Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Dalton Trans ; 51(3): 1099-1111, 2022 Jan 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34935812

ABSTRACT

Four new ruthenium(II) polypyridine complexes bearing 18ß-glycyrrhetinic acid derivatives, [Ru(bpy)2L](PF6)2 (Ru1), [Ru(dmb)2L](PF6)2 (Ru2), [Ru(dtb)2L](PF6)2 (Ru3) and [Ru(phen)2L](PF6)2 (Ru4) (bpy = 2,2-bipyridine, dmb = 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine, dtb = 4,4'-di-tert-butyl-2,2'-bipyridine, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline and L is the GA modified new ligand) were designed and synthesized. Their antimicrobial activities against Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) were evaluated and all complexes showed an obvious inhibitory effect, especially, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of Ru2 was 3.9 µg mL-1. Moreover, Ru2 was found to significantly inhibit the formation of biofilms. The membrane-compromising action mode was suggested to be their potential antibactericidal mechanism. In hemolysis experiments, Ru2 hardly showed cytotoxicity to mammalian erythrocytes. Furthermore, the synergism between Ru2 and common antibiotics, such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, tetracyclines and ofloxacin, against S. aureus was also detected using the checkerboard method. Finally, a mouse skin infection model was established to evaluate the antibacterial activity of Ru2in vivo, and the results showed that Ru2 could effectively promote wound healing in mice infected with S. aureus. Moreover, the results of histopathological research were consistent with the results of the hemolysis test, indicating that the Ru2 complex was almost non-toxic. Thus, it was demonstrated that the polypyridine ruthenium complexes modified with glycyrrhetinic acid (GA) are a promising strategy for developing interesting antibacterial agents.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemical synthesis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Glycyrrhetinic Acid/pharmacology , Ruthenium Compounds/chemical synthesis , Ruthenium Compounds/pharmacology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Animals , Biofilms/drug effects , Mice , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Molecular Structure , Ruthenium Compounds/adverse effects , Skin/drug effects , Skin Irritancy Tests
2.
Met Ions Life Sci ; 182018 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29394025

ABSTRACT

There has been much recent interest in the development of therapeutic transition metal-based complexes in part fueled by the clinical success of the platinum(II) anticancer drug, cisplatin. Yet known platinum drugs are limited by their high toxicity, severe side-effects, and incidences of drug resistance. Organometallic ruthenium-arene complexes have risen to prominence as a pharmacophore due to the success of other ruthenium drug candidates in clinical trials. In this chapter, we highlight higher order multinuclear ruthenium-arene complexes and their respective investigations as chemotherapeutic agents. We discuss their unique structural properties and the associated biochemical evaluation in the context of anticancer drug design. We also review the structural considerations for the design of these scaffolds and new therapeutic applications that are uncovered for this class of complexes.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Design , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Organometallic Compounds/therapeutic use , Ruthenium Compounds/therapeutic use , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/metabolism , Coordination Complexes , Humans , Models, Molecular , Molecular Structure , Neoplasms/metabolism , Neoplasms/pathology , Organometallic Compounds/adverse effects , Organometallic Compounds/chemistry , Organometallic Compounds/metabolism , Protein Binding , Ruthenium Compounds/adverse effects , Ruthenium Compounds/chemistry , Ruthenium Compounds/metabolism , Structure-Activity Relationship
3.
PLoS One ; 12(8): e0183833, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28859118

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To report on radiation-related side effects and complications after ruthenium-106 plaque brachytherapy of uveal melanomas. METHODS: Medical records of 143 eyes with uveal melanoma, treated by ruthenium-106 brachytherapy between 1997 and 2012 at a single center, were analyzed. We evaluated the occurrence of radiation-related side effects on the anterior and posterior segment of the eye. The influence of patient, tumor and treatment parameters on outcome was analyzed by multivariate time to event analysis considering competing risks. RESULTS: The median overall follow-up was 37.9 months. After treatment, the estimated risk at 12, 24 and 48 months for developing anterior segment complications was 25.3%, 37.5% and 50.3% for cataract formation and 5.4%, 6.4% and 8.1% for secondary glaucoma, respectively. The estimated risk for the occurrence of posterior segment complications 12, 24 and 48 months after treatment was 3.1%, 6.7% and 18.3% for radiation retinopathy, 18.3%, 27.1% and 42.6% for radiation maculopathy and 16.5%, 21.0% and 32.8% for radiation neuropathy, respectively. The risk of an increase in retinal detachment after treatment was 14.7%, 14.7% and 17.4% at 12, 24 and 48 months, respectively. The risk of vitreous hemorrhage occurring after treatment was 6.2%, 8.1% and 12.7%, and the risk of tumor vasculopathy was 15.4%, 17.4% and 19.0%. Scleral necrosis was observed in one patient. CONCLUSION: Radiation-related side effects and complications are common among patients treated with ruthenium brachytherapy for uveal melanoma. However, the risk for those largely depends on individual tumor parameters. Before treatment, patients should be informed of their specific risks to develop various side effects. Patient information before treatment should cover not only general information about the treatment and possible complications and side effects but should also give details on the specific risks of the patient in her individual situation. This also includes elucidating the patient's individual resources and expectations and her willingness for long-term regular follow-up examinations and secondary adjunct treatments.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Melanoma/radiotherapy , Ruthenium Compounds/adverse effects , Uveal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Visual Acuity/radiation effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cataract/etiology , Cataract/pathology , Eye/pathology , Eye/radiation effects , Female , Humans , Male , Melanoma/complications , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Optic Nerve Diseases/etiology , Optic Nerve Diseases/pathology , Retinal Detachment/etiology , Retinal Detachment/pathology , Uveal Neoplasms/complications , Uveal Neoplasms/pathology , Vitreous Hemorrhage/etiology , Vitreous Hemorrhage/pathology
4.
J Inorg Biochem ; 169: 1-12, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28088012

ABSTRACT

In this study, we have developed a series of new monofunctional Ru(II) complexes of the general formula mer-[Ru(Cl-Ph-tpy)(N-N)Cl]Cl in which Cl-Ph-tpy is 4'-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2':6',2″-terpyridine, N-N is a bidentate chelating ligand (1,2-diaminoethane (en, 1), 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (dach, 2) or 2,2'-bipyridine (bpy, 3)). All complexes were fully characterized by elemental analysis and spectroscopic techniques (IR, UV-Vis, 1D and 2D NMR). Their chemical behavior in aqueous solution was studied by UV-Vis and NMR spectroscopy showing that all compounds are relatively labile leading to the formation of the corresponding aqua species 1aq-3aq. Their DNA binding ability was evaluated by UV-Vis spectroscopy, fluorescence quenching measurements and viscosity measurements. Competitive studies with ethidium bromide (EB) showed that the complexes can displace DNA-bound EB, suggesting strong competition with EB (Ksv=1.1-2.7×104M-1). These experiments show that the ruthenium complexes interact with DNA via intercalation. The complexes bind to serum protein albumin displaying relatively high binding constants (Ksv=104-105M-1). Compound 3 displayed from high to moderate cytotoxicity against two cancer cell lines HeLa and A549 (with IC50ca. 12.7µM and 53.8µM, respectively), while complexes 1 and 2 showed only moderate cytotoxicity (with IC50ca. 84.8µM and 96.3µM, respectively) against HeLa cells. The cell cycle analysis (by flow cytometry) of HeLa and A549 cells treated with complex 3 shows minor changes on the cell cycle phase distribution.


Subject(s)
DNA/metabolism , Intercalating Agents/chemistry , Intercalating Agents/chemical synthesis , Ruthenium Compounds/chemistry , Ruthenium Compounds/chemical synthesis , Ruthenium/chemistry , Serum Albumin, Bovine/metabolism , A549 Cells , Animals , Cattle , Cell Cycle/drug effects , Cell Survival/drug effects , DNA/chemistry , HeLa Cells , Humans , Intercalating Agents/adverse effects , Protein Binding , Ruthenium Compounds/adverse effects , Serum Albumin, Bovine/chemistry
5.
J Inorg Biochem ; 146: 89-96, 2015 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25708310

ABSTRACT

The antitumor activity of a ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex, Δ-[Ru(bpy)2(HPIP)](ClO4)2 (Δ-Ru1, where bpy=2,2'-bipyridine, HPIP=2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline), was evaluated. The in vivo experiments showed that Δ-Ru1 inhibited the growth of a human cervical carcinoma cell line (HeLa) xenotransplanted into nude mice with efficiency similar to that of cisplatin. Histopathology examination of the tumors from treated xenograft models was consistent with apoptosis in tumor cells. Importantly, in striking contrast with cisplatin, Δ-Ru1 did not cause any detectable side effects on the kidney, liver, peripheral neuronal system, or the hematological system at the pharmacologically effective dose. The preclinical studies reported here provide support for the clinical use of Δ-Ru1 as an exciting new drug candidate with lower toxicity than cisplatin, endowed with proapoptotic properties.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Organometallic Compounds/adverse effects , Ruthenium Compounds/adverse effects , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/toxicity , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cisplatin/adverse effects , Female , HeLa Cells , Humans , Kidney/drug effects , Liver/drug effects , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Nude , Organometallic Compounds/chemistry , Organometallic Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Organometallic Compounds/pharmacology , Organometallic Compounds/toxicity , Peripheral Nerves/drug effects , Ruthenium Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Ruthenium Compounds/toxicity
6.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ; 13(7): 3293-8, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22994750

ABSTRACT

The present study was conducted to evaluate in vivo anticancer activity of two novel mononuclear ruthenium(II) compounds, namely Ru(1,10-phenanthroline)2(2-nitro phenyl thiosemicarbazone)Cl2 (Compound R1) and Ru (1,10-phenanthroline)2(2-hydroxy phenyl thiosemicarbazone)Cl2 (Compound R2) against Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) mice and in vitro cytotoxic activity against IEC-6 (small intestine) cell lines and Artemia salina nauplii using MTT [(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)] and BLT [brine shrimp lethality] assays respectively. The test ruthenium compounds at the doses 2 and 4 mg/kg body weight showed promising biological activity, especially in decreasing tumor volume, viable ascites cell counts and body weights. These compounds prolonged the life span (% ILS), mean survival time (MST) of mice bearing-EAC tumor. The results for in vitro cytotoxicity against IEC-6 cells showed the ruthenium compound R2 to have significant cytotoxic activity with a IC50 value of 20.0 µg/mL than R1 (IC50=78.8 µg/mL) in the MTT assay and the LC50 values of R1 and R2 compounds were found to be 38.3 and 43.8 µg/mL respectively in the BLT assay. The biochemical and histopathological results revealed that there was no significant hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity associated with the ruthenium administration to mice.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor/drug therapy , Ruthenium Compounds/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Body Weight/drug effects , Carcinoma, Ehrlich Tumor/mortality , Cell Line, Tumor , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Male , Mice , Phenanthrolines/chemistry , Phenanthrolines/pharmacology , Ruthenium Compounds/adverse effects , Thiosemicarbazones/chemistry , Thiosemicarbazones/pharmacology
7.
J Inorg Biochem ; 104(9): 967-77, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20605217

ABSTRACT

The complexes [Ru(eta(6)-p-cymene)(CQ)Cl(2)] (1), [Ru(eta(6)-benzene)(CQ)Cl(2)] (2), [Ru(eta(6)-p-cymene)(CQ)(H(2)O)(2)][BF(4)](2) (3), [Ru(eta(6)-p-cymene)(en)(CQ)][PF(6)](2) (4), [Ru(eta(6)-p-cymene)(eta(6)-CQDP)][BF(4)](2) (5) (CQ = chloroquine base; CQDP = chloroquine diphosphate; en = ethylenediamine) interact with DNA to a comparable extent to that of CQ and in analogous intercalative manner with no evidence for any direct contribution of the metal, as shown by spectrophotometric and fluorimetric titrations, thermal denaturation measurements, circular dichroism spectroscopy and electrophoresis mobility shift assays. Complexes 1-5 induced cytotoxicity in Jurkat and SUP-T1 cancer cells primarily via apoptosis. Despite the similarities in the DNA binding behavior of complexes 1-5 with those of CQ the antitumor properties of the metal drugs do not correlate with those of CQ, indicating that DNA is not the principal target in the mechanism of cytotoxicity of these compounds. Importantly, the Ru-CQ complexes are generally less toxic toward normal mouse splenocytes and human foreskin fibroblast cells than the standard antimalarial drug CQDP and therefore this type of compound shows promise for drug development.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/drug effects , DNA/chemistry , Ruthenium Compounds/chemistry , Ruthenium Compounds/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/chemical synthesis , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Cell Line, Tumor , Cells, Cultured , Chloroquine/adverse effects , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Mice , Ruthenium Compounds/adverse effects , Ruthenium Compounds/chemical synthesis
8.
Anticancer Drugs ; 20(2): 97-103, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19209025

ABSTRACT

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study was carried out with the new ruthenium complex indazolium trans-[tetrachlorobis(1H-indazole)ruthenate(III)] (KP1019, FFC14A). Seven patients with various types of solid tumours refractory to standard therapy were treated with escalating doses of KP1019 (25-600 mg) twice weekly for 3 weeks. No dose-limiting toxicity occurred. Ruthenium plasma concentration-time profiles after the first dose and under multiple-dose conditions were analysed using a compartmental approach. The pharmacokinetic disposition was characterised by a small volume of distribution, low clearance and long half-life. Only a small fraction of ruthenium was excreted renally. The area under the curve values increased proportionally with dose indicating linear pharmacokinetics.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Indazoles/administration & dosage , Indazoles/pharmacokinetics , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ruthenium Compounds/administration & dosage , Ruthenium Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Aged , Algorithms , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Area Under Curve , Female , Humans , Indazoles/adverse effects , Infusions, Intravenous , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Biological , Organometallic Compounds , Ruthenium Compounds/adverse effects
9.
Chem Biodivers ; 5(10): 2140-2155, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18972504

ABSTRACT

The promising drug candidate indazolium trans-[tetrachlorobis(1H-indazole)ruthenate(III)] (KP1019) is the second Ru-based anticancer agent to enter clinical trials. In this review, which is an update of a paper from 2006 (Hartinger et al., J. Inorg. Biochem. 2006, 100, 891-904), the experimental evidence for the proposed mode of action of this coordination compound is discussed, including transport into the cell via the transferrin cycle and activation by reduction. The results of the early clinical development of KP1019 are summarized in which five out of six evaluated patients experienced disease stabilization with no severe side effects.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Indazoles , Ruthenium Compounds , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Apoptosis/drug effects , Blood Proteins/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Drug Stability , Humans , Indazoles/adverse effects , Indazoles/pharmacokinetics , Indazoles/therapeutic use , Organometallic Compounds , Oxidation-Reduction , Protein Binding , Ruthenium Compounds/adverse effects , Ruthenium Compounds/pharmacokinetics , Ruthenium Compounds/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...