ABSTRACT
Understanding the immune response generated by SARS-CoV-2 is critical for assessing efficient therapeutic protocols and gaining insights into the durability of protective immunity. The current work was aimed at studying the specific humoral responses against SARS-CoV-2 in Cuban COVID-19 convalescents. We developed suitable tools and methods based on ELISA methodology, for supporting this evaluation. Here, we describe the development of an ELISA for the quantification of anti-RBD IgG titers in a large number of samples and a similar test in the presence of NH4SCN as chaotropic agent for estimating the RBD specific antibody avidity. Additionally, a simple and rapid ELISA based on antibody-mediated blockage of the binding RBD-ACE2 was implemented for detecting, as a surrogate of conventional test, the levels of anti-RBD inhibitory antibodies in convalescent sera. In a cohort of 273 unvaccinated convalescents, we identified higher anti-RBD IgG titer (1 : 1,330, p < 0.0001) and higher levels of inhibitory antibodies blocking RBD-ACE2 binding (1 : 216, p < 0.05) among those who had recovered from severe illness. Our results suggest that disease severity, and not demographic features such as age, sex, and skin color, is the main determinant of the magnitude and neutralizing ability of the anti-RBD antibody response. An additional paired longitudinal assessment in 14 symptomatic convalescents revealed a decline in the antiviral antibody response and the persistence of neutralizing antibodies for at least 4 months after the onset of symptoms. Overall, SARS-CoV-2 infection elicits different levels of antibody response according to disease severity that declines over time and can be monitored using our homemade serological assays.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Immunity, Humoral , Immunoglobulin G , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Cuba , Male , Female , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Middle Aged , Adult , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Aged , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/metabolism , Antibody Affinity/immunologyABSTRACT
Influenza circulation was significantly affected in 2020-21 by the COVID-19 pandemic. During this time, few influenza cases were recorded. However, in the summer of 2021-22, an increase in atypical influenza cases was observed, leading to the resurgence of influenza in the southernmost state of Brazil, Rio Grande do Sul (RS). The present study aimed to identify the circulation of FLUAV, FLUBV and SARS-CoV-2 and characterize the influenza genomes in respiratory samples using high-throughput sequencing technology (HTS). Respiratory samples (n = 694) from patients in RS were selected between July 2021 and August 2022. The samples were typed using reverse transcriptase real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) and showed 32% (223/694) of the samples to be positive for SARS-CoV-2, 7% for FLUAV (H3) (49/694). FLUBV was not detected. RT-qPCR data also resulted in FLUAV and SARS-CoV-2 co-infections in 1.7% (4/223) of samples tested. Whole genome sequencing of FLUAV produced 15 complete genomes of the H3N2 subtype, phylogenetically classified in the 3C.2a1b.2a.2a.3 subclade and revealing the dominance of viruses in the southern region of Brazil. Mutation analysis identified 72 amino acid substitutions in all genes, highlighting ongoing genetic evolution with potential implications for vaccine effectiveness, viral fitness, and pathogenicity. This study underscores limitations in current surveillance systems, advocating for comprehensive data inclusion to enhance understanding of influenza epidemiology in southern Brazil. These findings contribute valuable insights to inform more effective public health responses and underscore the critical need for continuous genomic surveillance.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Genome, Viral , Influenza, Human , Phylogeny , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/classification , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Middle Aged , Adult , Female , Genome, Viral/genetics , Male , Young Adult , Aged , Adolescent , Disease Outbreaks , Whole Genome Sequencing , Child , Child, Preschool , Infant , Coinfection/epidemiology , Coinfection/virology , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Aged, 80 and over , GenomicsABSTRACT
Objective: To evaluate whether there were differences in the presentation of patients with tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP) during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of all cases of tubal EP between March 2019 and March 2020 (pre-pandemic) and between March 2020 and March 2021 (pandemic). We compared between these two groups the risk factors, clinical characteristics, laboratory data, sonographic aspects, treatment applied and complications. Results: We had 150 EP diagnoses during the two years studied, of which 135 were tubal EP. Of these, 65 were included in the pre-pandemic and 70 in the pandemic period. The prevalence of lower abdominal pain was significantly higher in the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (91.4% vs. 78.1%, p=0.031). There was no significant difference in shock index, initial beta-hCG level, hemoglobin level at diagnosis, days of menstrual delay, aspect of the adnexal mass, amount of free fluid on ultrasound, and intact or ruptured presentation between the groups. Expectant management was significantly higher during the pandemic period (40.0% vs. 18.5%, p=0.008), surgical management was lower during the pandemic period (47.1% vs. 67.7%, p=0.023), and number of days hospitalized was lower in the pandemic period (1.3 vs. 2.0 days, p=0.003). Conclusion: We did not observe a significant difference in patient history, laboratory and ultrasound characteristics. Abdominal pain was more common during the pandemic period. Regarding treatment, we observed a significant increase in expectant and a decrease in surgical cases during the pandemic period.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy, Tubal , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adult , Pregnancy, Tubal/surgery , Pregnancy, Tubal/epidemiology , Pregnancy, Tubal/diagnosis , Pregnancy, Tubal/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Risk Factors , Pandemics , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Young Adult , Cohort StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 infection has become a major international issue, not only from a medical point of view, but also social, economic and political. Most of the available information comes from the United States, Europe, and China, where the population and the socioeconomic status are very different from Latin American countries. This study evaluates the effect of regional socioeconomic characteristics on mortality due SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) from Argentina, Mexico and Brazil. METHODS: Data from three national registries, SAR-COVID (Argentina), CMR-COVID (Mexico) and ReumaCoV-Brasil (Brazil), were combined. Adult IMRD patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection were recruited. National data for each province/state, including population density, number of physicians per inhabitant, income, unemployment, GINI index, Municipal Human Development Index (MHDI), stringency index, vaccination rate and most frequent viral strains per period were assessed as risk factors for mortality due to COVID-19. RESULTS: A total of 4744 patients were included, 2534 (53.4%) from SAR-COVID, 1166 (24.6%) from CMRCOVID and 1044 (22.0%) from ReumaCoV-Brasil. Mortality due to COVID-19 was 5.4%. In the multivariable analysis, higher number of physicians per 1000 inhabitants and being infected during the vaccination period of each country were associated with lower mortality. After adjustment for socioeconomic factors, there was no association with country of residence and mortality. CONCLUSION: These findings corroborate the complex interplay between socioeconomic factors, rheumatic disease activity, and regional disparities as determinants of death due to COVID-19 in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico. Thus, this research provides valuable insights for guiding public health policies and clinical practice in the ongoing fight against the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Socioeconomic Factors , Humans , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/epidemiology , Rheumatic Diseases/mortality , Brazil/epidemiology , Mexico/epidemiology , Argentina/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , SARS-CoV-2 , Risk Factors , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Registries , Population DensityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic, diagnostic testing of the general population proved challenging due to limitations of the gold-standard diagnostic procedure using reverse transcription real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) for large-scale testing on the centralised model, especially in low-resource areas. OBJECTIVES: To address this, a point-of-care (PoC) diagnostic protocol for COVID-19 was developed, providing fast, reliable, and affordable testing, particularly for low-mid develop areas. METHODS: The PoC diagnostic process combines a simple paper-based RNA extraction method housed within a 3D-printed plastic device with a colorimetric reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) assay. Nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swabs (NOS) and saliva samples were tested between 2020 and 2021, with the assistance of Santa Catarina's State Health Secretary, Brazil. FINDINGS: The developed diagnostic protocol showed a limit of detection of 9,900 copies and an overall diagnostic specificity of 98% for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from 1,348 clinical analysed samples. The diagnostic sensitivity was 95% for NOS samples, 85% for early morning saliva, and 69% for indiscriminate saliva. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the developed device successfully extracted SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA from swabs and saliva clinical samples. When combined with colorimetric RT-LAMP, it provides results within 45 min using minimal resources, thus delivering a diagnostic kit protocol that is applicable in large-scale sampling.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Point-of-Care Testing , SARS-CoV-2 , Saliva , Sensitivity and Specificity , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Saliva/virology , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , Pandemics , Brazil , Nasopharynx/virology , Reproducibility of Results , COVID-19 Testing/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) is known for its pro-inflammatory properties and association with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity. However, existing detection methods for COVID-19 severity assessment often lack consideration of organs and tissues other than the lungs, which limits the accuracy and reliability of these predictive models. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective study included data from 515 COVID-19 patients (Cohort 1, n=415; Cohort 2, n=100) from two centers (Shanghai Public Health Center and Brazil Niteroi Hospital) between January 2020 and July 2020. Firstly, a three-stage EAT segmentation method was proposed by combining object detection and segmentation networks. Lung and EAT radiomics features were then extracted, and feature selection was performed. Finally, a hybrid model, based on seven machine learning models, was built for detecting COVID-19 severity. The hybrid model's performance and uncertainty were evaluated in both internal and external validation cohorts. RESULTS: For EAT extraction, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of the two centers were 0.972 (±0.011) and 0.968 (±0.005), respectively. For severity detection, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of the hybrid model increased by 0.09 (p<0.001), 19.3 % (p<0.05), and 18.0 % (p<0.05) in the internal validation cohort, and by 0.06 (p<0.001), 18.0 % (p<0.05) and 18.0 % (p<0.05) in the external validation cohort, respectively. Uncertainty and radiomics features analysis confirmed the interpretability of increased certainty in case prediction after inclusion of EAT features. CONCLUSION: This study proposed a novel three-stage EAT extraction method. We demonstrated that adding EAT radiomics features to a COVID-19 severity detection model results in increased accuracy and reduced uncertainty. The value of these features was also confirmed through feature importance ranking and visualization.
Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue , COVID-19 , Pericardium , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , Adipose Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Pericardium/diagnostic imaging , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Machine Learning , Brazil/epidemiology , Aged , China , Reproducibility of Results , Adult , Epicardial Adipose Tissue , RadiomicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: At the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, some workers had the opportunity to work from home, while others remained in on-site work. The aim of the present study was to compare the psychosocial work aspects, work ability, mental health conditions and SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of Brazilian workers in remote and on-site work through a longitudinal study with quarterly follow-up assessments over a 12-month period. METHOD: A convenience sample of 1,211 workers from different economic sectors participated in the study, 897 of whom (74.1%) worked from home and 314 (25.9%) remained in on-site work. Psychosocial work aspects were assessed using the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ). Work ability was assessed using the Work Ability Index (WAI) and the Work Ability Score (WAS). Mental health conditions and SARS-CoV-2 infection rate were recorded based on self-reported medical diagnoses. Online questionnaires were answered from June 2020 to September 2021, involving two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. The groups were compared using chi-square tests, t-tests, and two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: In the first wave of the pandemic, remote workers reported more quantitative demands and work-family conflicts, whereas on-site workers reported more emotional demands, low development of new skills, low commitment, low predictability, low recognition, and low satisfaction. They also reported greater occurrences of unwanted sexual attention, threats of violence, and physical violence. In the second wave, the remote group continued to report high work-family conflicts, whereas the on-site group reported - in addition to the results of the 1st wave - low influence at work, low quality of leadership, and burnout. No significant difference was found between groups with regards to the WAI in either wave. A significant difference was found for the WAS between the 3rd and 12th months (P < 0.01) in both groups. No significant differences were found between groups for the prevalence of anxiety, depression, burnout/stress, insomnia, panic syndrome, and eating disorders, except for the prevalence of insomnia at the 12-month follow-up, with higher rates in the remote group (P = 0.03). SARS-CoV-2 infection was significantly lower in the remote group (11.3%) compared to the on- site (16.9%) group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Psychosocial work aspects differed between remote and on-site workers. Work ability and mental health conditions were similar between groups. Remote work might have played a role in limiting the spread of the virus in Brazil had it been more widely available.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Brazil/epidemiology , Male , Longitudinal Studies , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Mental Health/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teleworking , Work Capacity Evaluation , PandemicsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In the European Union and peripheral countries, the availability of physicians working in primary health care services (PHCS) varies greatly and all countries report shortages and difficulties in recruiting more. The broad consensus that giving access to PHCS to all is a policy priority, reinforced by the lessons learned during the COVID-19 pandemic, implies that a sufficient fit-for-purpose workforce is available. This article focuses on physicians and reports on what countries have done, and with what success, to attract more medical students to a career in PHCS. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of articles in PubMed and Cochrane Library, and of grey literature in websites of international agencies, think-tanks, international non-governmental organizations, and European Commission-funded projects, published between January 2018 and February 2024. RESULTS: The search retrieved 1,143 records, of which 45 were eligible for the scoping review; 25 focused on medical students. The documents report interventions in 12 countries, 14 by individual education institutions, mostly in the form of exposure of diverse duration to general/family practice in the medical curriculum (specific modules, residencies, rotations, placements, mentorship), and 11 policy interventions at national level, such as increases in the number of training places for primary health care (PHC) specialties and improvement of working conditions. CONCLUSION: Accessible PHCS require the availability of a fit-for-purpose workforce of multiprofessional teams, in which specially trained physicians play a central role. To address shortages, many countries increased training opportunities, a necessary step, but not sufficient. More students must accept to opt for a PHC specialty, in a context of competition with other fields of practice also in need of more students, such as public health, geriatrics, or mental health. Success requires the collaboration of numerous actors, including professional councils and organizations, and regulation bodies that specialists tend to dominate. By making PHCS a political and policy priority, decision-makers can help make attraction more effective, but to do so, they need access to convincing evidence and information on good practices that only research can produce.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Career Choice , European Union , Primary Health Care , Students, Medical , Humans , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Infant vaccination coverage rates in Peru have declined in recent years, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Introduction of the fully-liquid diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP)-inactivated polio vaccine (IPV)-hepatitis B (HB)-Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib) hexavalent vaccine (DTaP-IPV-HB-Hib) in Peru's infant National Immunization Program may help improve coverage. We evaluated costs and healthcare outcomes, including coverage, of switching from a pentavalent vaccine containing whole-cell pertussis component (DTwP-HB-Hib) plus IPV/oral polio vaccine (IPV/OPV) to the hexavalent vaccine for the primary vaccination scheme (2, 4 and 6 months). METHODS: The analysis was performed over a 5-year period on a cohort of children born in Peru in 2020 (N = 494,595). Four scenarios were considered: the pentavalent plus IPV/OPV scheme (S1); replacing the pentavalent plus IPV/OPV scheme with the hexavalent scheme (S2); expanded delivery of the pentavalent plus IPV/OPV scheme (S3); expanded delivery of the hexavalent scheme (S4). Vaccine coverage and incidence of adverse reactions (ARs) were estimated using Monte Carlo simulations and previous estimates from the literature. Cases of vaccine-preventable diseases were estimated using a Markov model. Logistical and healthcare costs associated with these outcomes were estimated. Impact of key variables (including coverage rates, incidence of ARs and vaccine prices) on costs was evaluated in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The overall cost from a public health payer perspective associated with the pentavalent plus IPV/OPV vaccine scheme (S1) was estimated at $56,719,350, increasing to $61,324,263 (+ 8.1%), $59,121,545 (+ 4.2%) and $64,872,734 (+ 14.4%) in scenarios S2, S3 and S4, respectively. Compared with the status quo (S1), coverage rates were estimated to increase by 3.1% points with expanded delivery alone, and by 9.4 and 14.3% points, if the hexavalent vaccine is deployed (S2 and S4, respectively). In both scenarios with the hexavalent vaccine (S2 and S4), pertussis cases would also be 5.7% and 8.7% lower, and AR rates would decrease by 32%. The cost per protected child would be reduced when the hexavalent vaccine scheme. Incidence of ARs was an important driver of cost variability in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the hexavalent vaccine in Peru's National Immunization Program has a positive public health cost consequence.
Subject(s)
Haemophilus Vaccines , Immunization Programs , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated , Vaccination Coverage , Vaccines, Combined , Humans , Peru/epidemiology , Infant , Haemophilus Vaccines/economics , Haemophilus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Coverage/economics , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/economics , Poliovirus Vaccine, Inactivated/administration & dosage , Immunization Programs/economics , Vaccines, Combined/economics , Hepatitis B Vaccines/economics , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/economics , Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine/administration & dosage , Male , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/economics , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/economics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , SARS-CoV-2 , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Whooping Cough/economics , Whooping Cough/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has driven the search for alternative therapies, including convalescent plasma, historically used in infectious diseases. Despite results in other diseases, its effectiveness against COVID-19 remains uncertain with conflicting results in clinical trials. A pragmatic, single-center, prospective, and open randomized controlled trial was carried out in a hospital in Brazil, with the aim of evaluating the impact of convalescent plasma on the clinical improvement of patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The World Health Organization (WHO) ordinal scale was used to measure clinical improvement, focusing on the reduction in disease severity by up to 2 points, while antibody and C-reactive protein levels were monitored over time. After hospital admission, participants were randomized 1:1 to receive convalescent plasma and standard treatment or to be part of the control group with standard treatment. Follow-up was carried out on days 1, 3, 7, 14 and/or at discharge. From January 14 to April 4, 2022, 38 patients were included, but 3 were excluded due to protocol deviations, resulting in a total of 35 patients: 19 in the control group and 16 in the plasma group. There was no significant difference in clinical improvement between the convalescent plasma group and the control group, nor in secondary outcomes. The study had limitations due to the small number of patients and limited representation of COVID-19 cases. Broader investigations are needed to integrate therapies into medical protocols, both for COVID-19 and other diseases. Conducting randomized studies is challenging due to the complexity of medical conditions and the variety of treatments available.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Serotherapy , COVID-19 , Hospitalization , Immunization, Passive , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , Immunization, Passive/methods , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Brazil , Aged , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , Severity of Illness Index , Antibodies, Viral/bloodABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: to analyze the legislation issued during the COVID-19 pandemic for nursing education and immediate consequences. METHODS: documentary research, whose source was the legislation issued for nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Thirty-two documents were analyzed and submitted to a collection instrument. RESULTS: contradictions and consequences for nursing education following the guidelines and law of guidelines and bases were revealed. The consequences of the law affected the quality of teaching, equal access, exemption from minimum school days and course abbreviation. Regarding the guidelines, there was a lack of conditions for developing skills, in addition to the attempt to update them. Concerning internships, acting during the pandemic put students at risk, and their abbreviation prevented them from consolidating knowledge and skills. FINAL CONSIDERATIONS: remote teaching did not guarantee the quality and equality of teaching, weakened the development of skills, not taking into account nursing's educational needs.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Nursing , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Education, Nursing/legislation & jurisprudence , Education, Nursing/methods , BrazilABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had significant impacts on society, particularly on children and adolescents, who have faced serious social, educational, and health consequences due to the loss of their primary caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female fertility rates were analyzed, and estimates of male fertility were made to calculate the number of children under 18 years old by age group. Demographic and mortality information from COVID-19 infection was used to calculate the resulting orphanhood in Argentina during the period 2020-2021, considering the loss of one or both parents or the main caregiver grandparent. RESULTS: A total of 25161 Argentine children and adolescents lost one of their primary caregivers due to COVID-19 during the pandemic. Of these, 22729 were orphaned by mother or father during the analyzed period. The majority of cases (79.5%) were related to the father's death. Specific age groups with higher incidence of orphanhood were identified. The loss of caregiver grandparents was also significant, affecting 2432 children and adolescents. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the need for specific policies and programs to address the comprehensive needs of children and adolescents affected by orphanhood during the pandemic. Potential long-term impacts on the physical, mental, educational, and socioeconomic health of these children and adolescents are highlighted.
Introducción: La pandemia de COVID-19 ha ejercido impactos significativos en la sociedad, particularmente en niños, niñas y adolescentes (NNA), quienes han enfrentado consecuencias sociales, educativas y de salud graves debido a la pérdida de sus cuidadores principales. Materiales y métodos: Se analizaron las tasas de fertilidad femenina y se realizaron estimaciones sobre la fertilidad masculina a fin de calcular los hijos menores de 18 años por grupo de edad. Se utilizó información demográfica y de mortalidad por infección por COVID-19 para calcular la orfandad resultante en Argentina durante el período 2020-2021, considerando la pérdida de uno o ambos progenitores o del cuidador principal abuelo/a. Resultados: Un total de 25161 NNA argentinos perdieron a uno de sus cuidadores principales por el COVID-19 durante la pandemia. De ellos, 22729 NNA quedaron huérfanos de madre o padre durante el periodo analizado. La mayoría de los casos (79.5%) estuvo relacionada con la muerte del padre. Se identificaron grupos de edad específicos con mayor incidencia de orfandad. La pérdida de abuelos cuidadores también fue significativa, afectando a 2432 NNA. Discusión: Los hallazgos subrayan la necesidad de políticas y programas específicos para abordar las necesidades integrales de los NNA afectados por la orfandad durante la pandemia. Se destacan los posibles impactos a largo plazo en la salud física, mental, educativa y socioeconómica de estos niños y adolescentes.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Child, Orphaned , Humans , Argentina/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Female , Male , Child, Orphaned/statistics & numerical data , Child, Preschool , Infant , Caregivers/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Infant, Newborn , Birth Rate/trends , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The definition of quaternary prevention as the set of interventions that avoids or mitigates the consequences of unnecessary or excessive activity of medical interventionism and the health system. The definition of a new disease is a complex process that involves the identification, characterization and description of a medical condition that has not been previously recognized or documented. Since mid-2020, the term chronic COVID/long COVID has been used to describe the presence of signs and symptoms after an acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, with multiple terminologies and definitions in international literature. Post-infectious syndromes, myalgia encephalomyelitis and fibromyalgia, are some of the diseases that have similarities with chronic COVID. This article presents an analysis relating the concepts of new disease and quaternary prevention with chronic COVID and other diseases described in the literature.
Se define prevención cuaternaria como el conjunto de intervenciones que evita o atenúa las consecuencias de la actividad innecesaria o excesiva del intervencionismo médico y del sistema sanitario. La definición de una nueva enfermedad es un proceso complejo que involucra la identificación, caracterización y descripción de un cuadro clínico que no ha sido previamente reconocida o documentada. Desde mediados del año 2020 se utiliza el término COVID crónico/long COVID para describir la presencia de signos y síntomas luego de una infección aguda por SARS-CoV-2, con múltiples terminologías y definiciones en la literatura internacional. Los síndromes posinfecciosos, la encefalomielitis mialgia y la fibromialgia, son algunas de las enfermedades que tienen similitudes con el COVID crónico. En este artículo se presenta un análisis relacionando los conceptos de nueva enfermedad y prevención cuaternaria con el COVID crónico y otras enfermedades descritas en la literatura.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Chronic Disease , FibromyalgiaABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed healthcare systems and triggered global economic downturns. While vaccines have reduced the lethality rate of SARS-CoV-2 to 0.9% as of October 2024, the continuous evolution of variants remains a significant public health challenge. Next-generation medical therapies offer hope in addressing this threat, especially for immunocompromised individuals who experience prolonged infections and severe illnesses, contributing to viral evolution. These cases increase the risk of new variants emerging. This study explores miniACE2 decoys as a novel strategy to counteract SARS-CoV-2 variants. Using in silico design and molecular dynamics, blocking proteins (BPs) were developed with stronger binding affinity for the receptor-binding domain of multiple variants than naturally soluble human ACE2. The BPs were expressed in E. coli and tested in vitro, showing promising neutralizing effects. Notably, miniACE2 BP9 exhibited an average IC50 of 4.9 µg/mL across several variants, including the Wuhan strain, Mu, Omicron BA.1, and BA.2 This low IC50 demonstrates the potent neutralizing ability of BP9, indicating its efficacy at low concentrations.Based on these findings, BP9 has emerged as a promising therapeutic candidate for combating SARS-CoV-2 and its evolving variants, thereby positioning it as a potential emergency biopharmaceutical.
Subject(s)
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , Antibodies, Neutralizing , COVID-19 , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , SARS-CoV-2 , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Humans , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19/immunology , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/metabolism , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2/chemistry , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/metabolism , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/chemistry , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Computer Simulation , Pandemics , Protein Binding , Betacoronavirus/immunology , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Neutralization TestsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The discovery of the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor and carrier protein in the testicles, along with the mandatory preventive social isolation during 2020 and subsequent immunization, prompted us to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on seminal variables in males seeking consultation at the laboratory. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analytical and observational experimental design was employed. Seminal variables from semen analyses and kinetic values were analyzed using a computer-assisted sperm analysis system in 409 semen samples collected from patients attending the laboratory between April and December 2019, and April and December 2021. COVID-positive patients were stratified based on the time elapsed since the illness into three groups: less than 3 months (acute phase), 4-12 months, and more than 1 year. RESULTS: A significant difference (p=0.013) was found in the total sperm count per ejaculate in the COVID-positive group compared to the prepandemic and COVID-negative groups (Median (Q1-Q3): 67.49 (26.42-139.44) vs. 102.48 (43.86-197.05) and 96.72 (38.22-189.27)). When stratifying the COVID-positive group based on the time since the illness, the significant decrease (p=0.038) occurred during the acute phase, with recovery over time to values similar to the prepandemic and COVID-negative groups. Social isolation and vaccination did not have significant effects on seminal variables. DISCUSSION: The study revealed reversible changes in testicular function reflected by a decrease in sperm count in the total ejaculate of patients who had experienced COVID-19. These changes appear to be related to fever and inflammation rather than the virus infection itself.
Introducción: El hallazgo en testículo del receptor y la proteína transportadora del virus SARS-CoV-2, el aislamiento social preventivo obligatorio durante 2020 y la inmunización, nos condujeron a evaluar el efecto de la pandemia COVID-19 sobre las variables seminales de varones que consultaron al laboratorio. Materiales y métodos: Diseño experimental analítico, observacional y retrospectivo. Se analizaron las variables seminales del espermograma y los valores cinéticos mediante un sistema computarizado, en 409 muestras de semen de pacientes que concurrieron al laboratorio durante abril-diciembre 2019 y abril-diciembre 2021. Los pacientes COVID positivos fueron estratificados según el tiempo transcurrido desde la enfermedad en tres grupos: menos de 3 meses (fase aguda), 4-12 meses y más de 1 año. Resultados: Se halló diferencia significativa (p=0.013) en el recuento total de espermatozoides/eyaculado en el grupo COVID positivo con respecto al grupo prepandemia y COVID negativo (Mediana (Q1-Q3): 67.49 (26.42-139.44) vs. 102.48 (43.86-197.05) y 96.72 (38.22-189.27). Al estratificar el grupo COVID positivo según el tiempo transcurrido desde la enfermedad, la disminución significativa (p= 0.038) fue durante la fase aguda, recuperándose en el tiempo hasta llegar a valores similares a los grupos prepandemia y COVID negativo. El aislamiento social y la vacunación no tuvieron efectos significativos en las variables seminales. Discusión: El estudio evidenció cambios reversibles en la función testicular reflejado por la disminución de los espermatozoides en el total eyaculado de pacientes que habían tenido COVID-19. Estos cambios parecen estar relacionados con la fiebre y la inflamación y no a causa de la infección por el virus.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Semen Analysis , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Sperm Count , Pandemics , Semen/virology , Time Factors , Sperm Motility , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: After the establishment of the public health emergency of international concern in 2020, health systems worldwide and in Brazil observed the need to apply more extraordinary logistical efforts and possibly resources to combat the imminent pandemic. METHODS: Using the historical series of public expenditures of the National Health Fund (FNS), 2015 to 2021, the number of confirmed cases of COVID-19, and a seasonal ARIMAX model, we sought to assess how the increase in the new virus infections affected the systematic financing of the SUS in Brazil. RESULTS: There were signs of seasonality and an increasing trend in the expenditure variable, which in practical terms, only indicated that the resource contributions followed an increasing trajectory already underway before the advent of the pandemic. The 1% increase in COVID-19 cases, with a one-month lag, contributes to the 0.062% increase in the variation in FNS expenditures but a decrease of 0.058% with a two-month lag. CONCLUSION: The tests showed no evidence to confirm a positive shift on FNS spending growth trajectory due to the increase of COVID-19 cases, only observing a significant increase one month after the occurrence of COVID cases, probably due to their worsening after this period, which was followed by a similar and comparable decrease in percentage of growth in the following month.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Expenditures , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/economics , Humans , Brazil/epidemiology , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics/economics , SARS-CoV-2 , National Health Programs/economics , Healthcare Financing , Financing, GovernmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although important information concerning COVID-19 vaccination is available, the effects of the CoronaVac and ChadOx-1 vaccines on immunity and the redox balance in the upper airway mucosa of the aged population are not fully understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the impacts of two doses of the CoronaVac or ChadOx-1 vaccine on immune/inflammatory responses and oxidative stress in the airway mucosa of older adults. METHODS: Seventy-six older adults of both sexes, with a mean age of 75.1 ± 6.4 years, were separated according to vaccination status into the CoronaVac (n = 52) and ChadOx-1 (n = 24) groups. Saliva samples were collected before (pre) and 30 days after (post) the administration of the second dose of the CoronaVac or ChadOx-1 vaccine to assess the levels of antibodies (sIgA and IgG), antimicrobial peptides, cytokines, and oxidant/antioxidant agents. RESULTS: The immunogenicity in the ChadOx-1 group was 37.5% for sIgA and 25% for IgG, while that in the CoronaVac group was 18.9% for sIgA and 13.2% for IgG. Intergroup analysis revealed that (1) lower levels of IFN-α, IFN-γ, and IL-10 and a greater IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio, in addition to a greater IL-6/IL-10 ratio, were found in both the pre- and postvaccination periods, and (2) lower levels of total sIgA, IL-12p70, IL-17A, TNF-α, and the IL-12p70/IL-10 ratio, in addition to higher levels of specific sIgA for SARS-CoV-2 antigens and lysozyme, were observed only in the postvaccination period in the ChadOx-1 group than in the CoronaVac group. Intragroup analysis revealed (1) a significant increase in the salivary levels of total peroxides in the postvaccination period compared to those in the prevaccination period in both volunteer groups; (2) a decrease in the levels of lysozyme and the ratio between total antioxidant capacity (TAC) and total peroxides in the postvaccination period in the CoronaVac group compared with those in the prevaccination period; and (3) decreases in the TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-12p70 levels, and the IL-12p70/IL-10 ratio in the ChadoX-1 group, as well as a higher lactoferrin concentration in the postvaccination period than in the prevaccination period. Several positive and negative correlations between the parameters assessed here were found. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the ChadOx-1 group exhibited improvements in both immune/inflammatory responses and redox balance and greater immunogenicity than did the CoronaVac group.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Oxidative Stress , Saliva , Humans , Female , Male , Aged , Oxidative Stress/physiology , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Saliva/metabolism , Saliva/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/immunology , Aged, 80 and over , Cytokines/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Immunoglobulin G , Inflammation/metabolism , Vaccines, InactivatedABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the well-being of millions of people around the globe. The evidence has shown that during the COVID-19 pandemic, the mental health of the population was affected, which means that there is an extra demand to implement different actions to mitigate and treat mental health disorders result of the pandemic. According to the literature it was expected that the prevalence of mental health disorders, such as anxiety and depression increased by 25 per cent worldwide, and Colombia was not the exception. However, there is not clear evidence on how much this increase might be. This study aims to estimate the prevalence of anxiety and depression for female and male adolescents and adults in Colombia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. It estimated the potential increase of the prevalence in each group as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. We used the Individual Registry of Health Services Delivery data from 2015-2021 to estimate the observed prevalence of anxiety and depression in Colombia for female and male adults. In addition, using the National Mental Health Survey 2015, we simulated the prevalence of anxiety and depression for adolescents (12 to 17 years) and adults (18 or older) in 2015 and using a static Monte Carlo simulation process we estimated the expected prevalence of depression and anxiety for each group from 2016 to 2021. The results of the analysis using revealed an important increase in the observed prevalence of depression and anxiety for adults and adolescents and men and women between 2015 and February 2020. When we simulated different scenarios using as a base line the National Mental Health Survey and estimated the prevalence of depression and anxiety for female and male adults and adolescents, we found that the prevalence of depression and anxiety has had an important increase in the last five years for all groups and had an important increase during 2020. This increase was greater for women compared to men, and adolescents than adults. Our results show the number of people who need potential attention from the health system in Colombia and highlight the importance to think about how to avoid and detect potential cases of anxiety and depression especially in female adolescents.
Subject(s)
Anxiety , COVID-19 , Depression , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Colombia/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adolescent , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Prevalence , Adult , Young Adult , Pandemics , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Child , Mental Health/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Places of worship serve as a venue for both mass and routine gathering around the world, and therefore are associated with risk of large-scale SARS-CoV-2 transmission. However, such routine gatherings also offer an opportunity to distribute self-tests to members of the community to potentially help mitigate transmission and reduce broader community spread of SARS-CoV-2. Over the past four years, self-testing strategies have been an impactful tool for countries' response to the COVID-19 pandemic, especially early on to mitigate the spread when vaccination and treatment options were limited. We used an agent-based mathematical model to estimate the impact of various strategies of symptomatic and asymptomatic self-testing for a fixed percentage of weekly routine gatherings at places of worship on community transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil, Georgia, and Zambia. Testing strategies assessed included weekly and bi-weekly self-testing across varying levels of vaccine effectiveness, vaccine coverage, and reproductive numbers to simulate developing stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Self-testing symptomatic people attending routine gatherings can cost-effectively reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2 within places of worship and the community, resulting in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $69-$303 USD. This trend is especially true in contexts where population level attendance at such gatherings is high, demonstrating that a distribution approach is more impactful when a greater proportion of the population is reached. Asymptomatic self-testing of attendees at 100% of places of worship in a country results in the greatest percent of infections averted and is consistently cost-effective but remains costly. Budgetary needs for asymptomatic testing are expensive and likely unaffordable for lower-middle income countries (520-1550x greater than that of symptomatic testing alone), promoting that strategies to strengthen symptomatic testing should remain a higher priority.