Transoral removal of submandibular hilar lithiasis: results on the salivary duct system, glandular parenchyma, and quality-of-life recovery.

OBJECTIVE(S): To confirm that hilar transoral submandibular sialolitectomy (TOSL) is the first treatment option for submandibular hilar lithiasis (SHL) in terms of glandular parenchyma recovery, salivary system restoration, and patient quality of life (QoL) improvement. METHODS: Depending on whether the stone was easily palpable, TOSL was carried out with or without sialendoscopy. For the first time in the literature, Magnetic Resonance Sialography (MR-Si) was performed before and after TOSL, to evaluate stone characteristics, glandular parenchyma status, hilum dilation and main duct recanalization. Radiological data was examined independently by two radiologists. COSQ, a recently validated and specific questionnaire, was used to assess associated QoL. RESULTS: Between 2017 and 2022, 29 TOSL patients were examined. With a high interobserver correlation, MR-Si was confirmed as a very useful radiological test in the pre- and post-surgical evaluation of SHL. The salivary main duct was completely recanalized in all cases. The presence of lithiasis was found in 4 patients (13.8%). After surgery, the majority of patients (79.31%) had hilum dilation. There was a statistically significant improvement in parenchyma status, but no significant progression to glandular atrophy. After surgery, COSQ mean values always improved (22.5 to 4.5). CONCLUSIONS: TOSL is the ideal surgical technique for the management of SHL, resulting in improved parenchymal inflammatory changes, recanalization of Wharton's duct, and enhancement patients' QoL. As a result, before removing the submandibular gland, TOSL should be considered as the first treatment option for SHL.

Giant submandibular sialolith: a case report.

Introduction: Salivary glands lithiasis (Sialolithiasis) is defined as calcified concretions in the salivary glands. Most common localization is in submandibular gland. Usually, submandibular stones are mainly located in Wharton's duct, whereas parotid stones are more often located in the gland parenchyma. Sialoliths are usually 5-10 mm in size, and stones more than 10 mm are unusual sizes. Exact etiology of sialolith formation is still unknown. Case Report: We discuss a case of a 70-year-old patient, presenting painful swelling and a giant submandibular gland sialolith successfully treated with open surgery. Conclusions: A careful anamnesis and physical examination of the patient are important in the diagnosis of sialolithiasis. In addition, several imaging techniques, such as panoramic X-rays and Ultrasound, can be applied. The management can be both medical and surgical.

Combined sialendoscopic/mini-preauricular microscopic approach for large proximal parotid sialolithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and evaluate a combined approach for sialendoscopic stone localization with microscopic mini-preauricular incision external stone extraction as a gland-sparing minimally invasive surgical management in cases of large proximal duct or intraparenchymal parotid gland sialolithiasis. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of a single primary surgeon's patient series of 21 cases operated in a 5-year period in a tertiary care university and private practice hospitals. RESULTS: Study included 16 males and five females, with age range 12-68 years (mean 40.9 ± 14.5). Nineteen out of the 21 patients had their stones completely removed (90.5%), with two not completing the procedure due to inability of intraoperative endoscopic stone visualization. In total 25 stones were extracted with six patients having two stones. Longest diameter of single (or first) stone was 5-16 mm (mean 9.1 ± 2.9) and second was 3-5 mm (mean, 3.9 ± 0.6). Endoscopic findings showed 14/25 stones in the proximal main parotid duct and 11/25 in one of its secondary parenchymal branches. Stents were used in 4/19 cases (21.1%). No major complications occurred. Minor complications included two postoperative conservatively managed seromas. All 19 cases had completely intact facial nerve function, good parotid salivary flow and acceptable esthetic result after median follow-up period of 26 months (range 6-62). CONCLUSION: The combined sialendoscopic/microscopic mini-preauricular approach is a highly effective and safe gland-preserving method for large proximal parotid sialolithiasis management with a main limitation being inability to visualize the stone endoscopically.

Concurrent giant sialoliths within the submandibular gland parenchyma and distal segment of Wharton's duct: Novel case report.

OBJECTIVE: This article discusses the clinical significance of an unusual case of the simultaneous occurrence of 2 giant sialoliths within the ipsilateral submandibular gland and distal aspect of Wharton's duct in a 63-year-old patient. BACKGROUND: The majority of submandibular gland sialoliths are found in Wharton's duct, with fewer within the gland parenchyma. Giant sialoliths (exceeding 15 mm in size) are rare. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An asymptomatic, otherwise healthy older patient sought dental care and underwent a comprehensive oral and radiographic examination. RESULTS: A panoramic radiograph revealed 2 incidental radiopaque structures, representing giant sialoliths within the submandibular gland and along the distal segment of Wharton's duct. This synchronous finding apparently represents the first case reported in the geriatric literature. CONCLUSIONS: The detection of 1 salivary stone should heighten the scrutiny for additional stones. Practitioners should carefully weigh the risk of sialolith removal versus deferment of treatment in older medically compromised patients.

Ultrasound-guided sialo-irrigation for the treatment of chronic sialodochitis with sialolithiasis.

Sialolithiasis is one of the most common causes of salivary duct obstruction. In the last 20 years, minimally invasive procedures like sialendoscopy, extracorporeal lithotripsy, and basket snaring are increasingly being used for the treatment of salivary gland duct stones. Sialo-irrigation of the salivary gland is an effective procedure for treating inflammation and providing symptomatic relief. This procedure can be employed for the treatment of sialolithiasis using the back pressure of instilled saline. Sialo-irrigation under ultrasound (US) guidance allows for dynamic studies showing real-time images during diagnostic or surgical procedure and can be used for the removal of sialoliths. In addition, it can also be used to remove primitive sialoliths and microliths by washing out the ductal system, which prevents the recurrence of sialoliths. The aim of this study was to propose a minimally invasive technique for sialolithiasis using US-guided sialo-irrigation.

In Vivo Accuracy of Ultrasound for Sizing Salivary Ductal Calculi.

OBJECTIVES: The present study was developed to evaluate the accuracy of in vivo ultrasound sizing for parotid and submandibular salivary gland calculi, as compared with ex vivo pathology sizing with a standard plastic ruler after extraction. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Ultrasound is frequently used to size salivary calculi and make treatment decisions, but the accuracy of measurements from this modality has not been validated. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We evaluated and reviewed the charts and ultrasound examinations of 167 patients who underwent procedures for the treatment of sialolithiasis involving the parotid and submandibular glands. US examinations were performed between 2009 and 2016 in a tertiary-level hospital setting by the senior author. Measurements were collected from ultrasound evaluation before sialolithotomy, and pathology measurements were taken after removal. Ultrasound measurements in millimeters were compared with the measurements collected with a ruler. The differences were calculated and compared. RESULTS: A total of 167 calculi measurements were compared. Good concurrent validity between pathology and ultrasound measurements was suggested by a Pearson correlation of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.887-0.937). On Bland-Altman plot, correlation of the difference between US and pathology measurements showed a mean difference of 0.095 mm (95% CI, -0.19 to 0.38 mm) with a limit of agreement ranging from -3.59 mm (95% CI, -3.84 to -3.34 mm) to +3.78 mm (95% CI, +3.53 to +4.03 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is an accurate, relatively precise, and minimally invasive imaging tool for salivary gland sialolithiasis. Preoperative size of calculi can be used to guide management and clinical decision making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2C.

Treatment strategy of hilar and intraglandular stones in wharton's duct: A 12-year experience.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To suggest a strategy for transoral removal of hilar and intraparenchymal submandibular stones. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation was performed for 514 consecutive patients with hilar and intraparenchymal submandibular stones treated via endoscopy-assisted surgery from January 2006 to June 2018. Three patients had bilateral stones. The stones were classified as: hilar (type I), posthilar (type II), intraparenchymal (type III), and multiple stones (type IV). RESULTS: The affected glands included 311 with type I, 84 with type II, 65 with type III, and 57 with type IV stones. Stones were successfully removed in 478 glands (92.5%, 478/517). Main treatment techniques included hilum ductotomy in 311 glands, intraparenchymal ductotomy in 68, submandibulotomy in 14, intraductal retrieval in 74, and hilum ductotomy accompanied by intraductal retrieval in 11. At a mean 40-months follow-up of 478 successful cases, clinical outcomes were good in 425, fair in 27, and poor in 26 glands. Postoperative sialograms in 75 stone-free patients were categorized as: type I, normal (n = 6); type II, ectasia or stenosis in the main duct and no persistent contrast on functional films (n = 44); type III, ectasia or stenosis in the main duct and mild contrast retention (n = 15); and type IV, poor shape of the main duct and evident contrast retention (n = 10). Postoperative sialometry of 32 patients revealed no significant differences of the gland function between the two sides. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate use of various endoscopy-assisted approaches helps preserve the gland and facilitates recovery of gland function in patients with different depths of hilo-parenchymal submandibular stones. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:2360-2365, 2020.

Analysis of efficiency of sialendoscopy in patients with sialolithiasis

The aim of this research was to analyze 106 clinical observations in which sialendoscopy was performed for diagnosis and treatment patients with sialolithiasis. This research showed, that endoscopy of the major salivary gland ductal system allows to obtain information not only on a sialolith, but also on a condition of ductal system. The obtained data define a method of further treatment. Sialendoscopy can be used not only as diagnostic method, but also as an independent method for sialolith removing or as an assistance. The possibility of sialolith removing depends on its mobility, the size of salivary stone, localization and a salivary duct condition.

Wireless mobile ultrasonography-assisted parotid duct stone removal.

Ultrasonography is highly sensitive for the diagnosis of sialoliths. Recently, wireless mobile ultrasonography was developed. We describe the case of a 49-year-old man who presented with painful postprandial left cheek swelling. Computed tomography detected a solitary 5-mm parotid duct stone with infection at the anterior portion of the left masseter muscle. Transoral stone removal was planned, although difficulty was expected in view of the surrounding infection. Surgery was performed under the guidance of mobile ultrasonography, and the stone was removed safely.

Prognostic factors for therapeutic sialendoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To review our experience with therapeutic sialendoscopy in both the submandibular and parotid glands in order to determine prognostic factors and improve successful outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Single-centre, retrospective chart review. METHOD: The medical records of patients who had undergone sialendoscopy for sialolithiasis were reviewed, and demographic details, stone data (location, size, multiplicity, mobility), and operative technique and success were recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included: 70 patients with submandibular stones and 15 with parotid stones. Sialendoscopy was successful in all cases. Complete endoscopic removal was successful in 51 per cent of patients with submandibular stones and 47 per cent of those with parotid stones. Size (less than 5 mm) and distance from the papilla (less than 3 cm) were significant factors affecting success for patients with submandibular duct stones. However, this was not the case for patients with parotid duct stones, with neither variable achieving significance; nevertheless, numbers were small. CONCLUSION: Stone size and location significantly affect the success of therapeutic sialendoscopy in submandibular glands.

Sialendoscopic removal of fish bone-induced sialoliths in the duct of the submandibular gland.

Obstructive sialadenitis of the submandibular gland is commonly caused by sialoliths, but more rarely by foreign body-induced sialoliths. Here, we report minimally invasive sialendoscopic removal of fish bone-induced sialoliths in the duct of the submandibular gland. A 43-year-old woman presented with recurrent swelling of the right submandibular gland at other hospital. Computed tomography (CT) showed an 8-mm linear calcification in the posterior part of Wharton's duct. The lesion was deemed difficult to remove and she was followed up. However, because the lesion did not resolve spontaneously within 9 months and chronic sialadenitis symptoms persisted, she was referred to our department for endoscopic removal. CT showed a linear calcification (5.6×1.2×0.8mm) connecting 2 spherical calcifications (2.3×2.1×1.9mm; 1.8×1.4×1.1mm) in the anterior part of Wharton's duct. The patient underwent endoscopic removal of the lesion using a 1.6-mm-diameter sialendoscope under local anesthesia. The specimen contained a fish bone connecting 2 sialoliths. The patient was unaware of the fish-bone injury. After removal, there was no recurrence of submandibular gland swelling during 6 months follow-up.

Treatment outcomes of sialendoscopy for submandibular gland sialolithiasis: The minor axis of the sialolith is a regulative factor for the removal of sialoliths in the hilum of the submandibular gland using sialendoscopy alone.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the general guidelines for the removal of sialoliths for submandibular gland sialolithiasis using sialendoscopy alone. METHODS: We analyzed 61 sialoliths treated using sialendoscopy in 42 patients with submandibular gland sialolithiasis. We evaluated the submandibular gland sialoliths and divided each case based upon the location: the Wharton's duct or the hilum. We measured the major and minor axes of the sialoliths using a soft tissue computed-tomography (CT) scan and evaluated the removal rate of the sialoliths using sialendoscopy alone. RESULTS: The removal rate of the sialoliths in the Wharton's duct (52.6%) was significantly higher than that in the hilum of the submandibular gland (26.1%) (P=0.042). The minor axis was significantly correlated to the treatment outcome of sialendoscopy alone for all cases (P=0.030). A significant correlation was observed for cases involving the hilum of the submandibular gland and the measurement of the minor axes of the sialoliths for the treatment outcome of sialendoscopy alone (P=0.009). The major axis showed no correlation with the treatment outcomes of sialendoscopy alone. CONCLUSION: The measurement of the minor axes of the sialoliths with a soft tissue CT scan was correlated with treatment outcome of sialendoscopy alone for all cases, particularly sialoliths in the hilum. The easurement of the major axis showed no correlation with outcomes of sialendoscopy alone.

The landmark for removal of sialoliths using sialendoscopy alone in parotid gland sialolithiasis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the general guidelines for removal of sialoliths in parotid gland sialolithiasis using sialendoscopy alone. METHODS: We analyzed 34 sialoliths treated using sialendoscopy in 26 patients with parotid gland sialolithiasis. We divided the Stensen's duct and parotid gland into for parts using computed tomography findings: (A) front of the masseter, (B) anterior and lateral to the center (anterolateral) of the masseter, (C) posterior and lateral to the center (posterolateral) of the masseter, (D) behind of the masseter. The location and size of each sialolith was assessed. RESULTS: The removal rates of sialoliths in the different locations by sialendoscopy alone were as follows: front of the masseter, 68.8%; anterolateral of the masseter, 60.0%; posterolateral of the masseter, 0%; and behind of the masseter, 33.3%. The removal rate using sialendoscopy alone was significantly higher in the sections anterior to the center of the masseter than in those posterior to the center of the masseter (66.7% [14/21] vs. 20.0% [2/10]; P=0.019). The size of the sialolith was not correlated to the removal rate by sialendoscopy alone. CONCLUSION: Sialoliths of the parotid gland located in positions anterior to the center of the masseter are significantly easier to remove by sialendoscopy alone. The center of the masseter is a general landmark for removal of sialoliths from the parotid gland using sialendoscopy alone. The size of the sialolith is not correlated with removal, except rare huge sialoliths.

Giant Sialolith of Submandibular Duct.

Sialolithiasis is one of the most common diseases of salivary glands and commonly involves submandibular gland and ducts. "Giant sialoliths" typically measure more than 15 mm in any dimension. Here, an unusual case of sialolith in submandibular duct is reported which progressed into a giant sialolith in six months' time is reported. A 42-year-old man presented with complaints of recurrent pain and swelling in the right submandibular area. A large stone was palpable intraorally within the Wharton's duct and intra-operatively, an elongated giant sialolith of 50 mm length was found which is the second largest to be published till date.

Evaluation of the prevalence of residual sialolith fragments after transoral approach of Wharton's duct.

Transoral submandibular duct sialolith removal is a simple technique with very few complications. Nevertheless, following this procedure, we have observed long-term calculus recurrence in a number of patients. We therefore elected to evaluate these cases. This was a monocentric prospective study performed between November 2013 and June 2014. All patients received surgery for submandibular gland lithiasis by intraoral removal of submandibular duct calculi. Between the day following the procedure and 3 months postsurgery, these patients systematically underwent an ultrasound examination of the submandibular gland. The study comprised 15 males and 15 females aged between 19 and 87 years, of which one male presented with bilateral calculi (n = 31). Asymptomatic sialolith fragments were found in 16% of patients. A statistically significant risk (p < 0.05) of residual sialolith was demonstrated in cases in which the calculus or multiple calculi fragmented perioperatively. Our aim was to remove the sialolith as non-traumatically as possible and to perform sialendoscopy at the end of the procedure to check the patency of the anterior ductal segment and to ensure that no residual calculus fragments were present despite the loss of fluid tightness subsequent to the opening of the hilum.

Chronic parotitis with multiple calcifications: Clinical and sialendoscopic findings.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To characterize clinical, imaging, and sialendoscopy findings in patients with chronic parotitis and multiple parotid calcifications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Clinical history, radiographic images and reports, lab tests, and operative reports were reviewed for adult patients with chronic parotitis and multiple parotid calcifications who underwent parotid sialendoscopy. RESULTS: Thirteen of 133 (10%) patients undergoing parotid sialendoscopy for chronic sialadenitis had more than one calcification in the region of the parotid gland. Seven patients (54%) were diagnosed with immune-mediated disease from autoimmune parotitis (positive Sjögren's antibodies or antinuclear antibodies) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. The six patients (46%) who did not have an immune-mediated disorder had most calcifications located anterior or along the masseter muscle. Eight of 13 patients (61%) had at least one calculus found in the parotid duct on sialendoscopy. Four patients (38%) had multiple punctate calcifications within the parotid gland, all of whom had either autoimmune parotitis or HIV. None of the proximal or punctate parotid calcifications posterior to the masseter were visualized on sialendoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic parotitis in conjunction with multiple parotid calcifications is uncommon and was identified in 10% of our cohort. We contrast two classifications of parotid calcifications: 1) intraductal stones that cause recurrent duct obstruction and are often located within the main parotid duct along or anterior to the masseter and 2) punctate intraparenchymal parotid gland calcifications that are not visualized on sialendoscopy and may represent underlying inflammatory disease. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 127:1565-1570, 2017.

[Giant sialolithiasis: Diagnosis and management. Case reports]. / Óriásnyálkövek: Diagnózis és kezelés.

Sialolithiasis is one of the most frequent form of calcifications in the maxillofacial area. 0.45% of the population is affected by symptoms caused by salivary calculi, though the estimated frequency including asymptomatic form may exceed 1% in adult population. Radiographs presenting a large portion of the maxillofacial region (panoramic radiography, computed tomography) could detect salivary calculi with high accuracy. The size of the sialoliths is usually less than 10 mm in diameter. Salivary calculi larger than 15 mm (considering the largest diameter) are classified as giant sialoliths and most of them are located in the submandibular gland or in its duct. Two unusually large submandibular salivary calculi cases are represented (diameters of 27 and 34 mm), whereas in one of the cases development and dimensional changes of the calculus are described via a seven years period. This case report represents diagnostic and therapeutic consequences in giant sialolithiasis and demonstrates possible differential diagnostic difficulties. Orv. Hetil., 2016, 157(49), 1967-1972.