Metastatic sarcomas of the oral cavity: A systematic review.

Oral metastatic sarcomas (OMSs) occur only occasionally, and information about their characteristics is based on the restricted number of cases reported in the literature. This study aims to systematically review the English literature to recognize the clinicopathologic characteristics of OMSs. An electronic search was performed in PubMed Central and Scopus databases. The search included all the published articles (human case reports and case series) up till April 2023, with no time restrictions. OMSs were slightly more prevalent in males in their fifth to seventh decades of life. However, a high percentage of OMSs has been reported in the second decade of life. Lower extremities, breasts and uterus are the most common primary origin of metastatic sarcoma. Gingiva and mandible were common locations in the oral cavity for metastatic deposits. Generally, they demonstrated widespread affliction. The mean time interval between primary tumor detection and diagnosis of the oral metastasis was about 33.54 ± 36.19 months. Death was reported in 83 patients (67.48 %) with a mean survival rate of 7.98 ± 10.30 months. The most common microscopic tumor types were leiomyosarcoma (n = 21, 17 %), followed by angiosarcoma (n = 20, 16.26 %) and osteosarcoma (n = 18, 14.63 %). In conclusion, while oral metastases of sarcomas are not common, those should be considered in the differential diagnosis of the oral lesions. Although OMSs show a high occurrence in the 7th decade of the life, the average age of patients with oral involvement is lower than the overall metastatic lesions. OMSs may present as widespread disease with poor prognosis.

Indications and outcomes of palliative major amputation in patients with metastatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with stage IV cancer often experience diminished quality of life and pain. Although palliative amputation (PA) can reduce pain, it is infrequently performed because of the morbidity associated with amputation and the limited life expectancy in this population. Here, we describe the indications for PA in patients with stage IV carcinoma or sarcoma and discuss their clinical courses and outcomes. We hypothesized that PA would be associated with reduced pain and improved quality of life in these patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of all patients who underwent major amputation (proximal to the ankle or wrist) for metastatic sarcoma or carcinoma from January 1995 to April 2021. We excluded patients who underwent amputation for indications other than palliation. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with survival after PA. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients underwent PA (11 for carcinoma, 15 for sarcoma). The most common indications for PA were pain (all patients) and fungating tumor (16 patients). PA was the initial surgery in 7 patients. Forequarter amputations were the most common procedure (6 patients). All patients reported reduced pain after PA, with the mean (±standard deviation) visual analog pain score (on a 10-point scale) decreasing from 5.7 ± 2.9 preoperatively to 0.43 ± 1.3 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative ECOG score was 1.9 ± 0.2 compared with 1.3 ± 0.1 postoperatively (p < 0.001). Fourteen patients were fitted for prostheses (6 upper extremity, 8 lower extremity). Two patients had local recurrence, both within 6 months after PA. The mean survival time after PA was 13 ± 12 months, and mean follow-up was 28 ± 29 months. Mean survival time after PA was not significantly different between patients with sarcoma (11 ± 11 months) versus carcinoma (15 ± 14 months) (p = 0.51). Adjuvant chemotherapy was positively associated with survival; no other factors were associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: PA was associated with significantly reduced pain in all patients with stage IV cancer. PA should be considered for those with intractable pain, fungating tumors, or symptoms that diminish quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Pseudoendocrine Sarcoma: Clinicopathologic Analysis of 23 Cases of a Distinctive Soft Tissue Neoplasm With Metastatic Potential, Recurrent CTNNB1 Mutations, and a Predilection for Truncal Locations.

The number of recognized epithelioid soft tissue neoplasms continues to increase and includes epithelioid schwannoma, sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma, and emerging entities such as sarcomas with GLI1 alterations. Here, we describe 23 cases of a previously unrecognized entity, provisionally termed "pseudoendocrine sarcoma." Pseudoendocrine sarcoma is a rare, distinctive tumor of uncertain lineage with a predilection for paravertebral soft tissue in older adults. Fifteen patients (65%) were male and 8 were female. Age at presentation ranged from 29 to 78 years (median: 62 y). Nineteen tumors (83%) occurred in truncal locations, including 15 tumors (65%) in paravertebral soft tissue; other locations included the posterior head (2 tumors), thigh (1), and orbit (1). Tumor size ranged from 2 to 19 cm (median: 6.35 cm). Pseudoendocrine sarcoma is composed of sheets, trabeculae, and nests of epithelioid or ovoid cells with indistinct borders, palely eosinophilic cytoplasm, and highly monomorphic, round nuclei with speckled chromatin. Pseudoglandular architecture was at least focally present in 16 tumors (70%), large extracellular hyaline globules were identified in 12 tumors (52%), and psammomatous calcifications were present in 8 (35%). Metaplastic ossification was identified in 2 tumors, and myxoid stroma was present in 1. Lymphovascular invasion was present in 5 of 18 tumors (28%). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated that most tumors showed nuclear positivity for ß-catenin (20/21 tumors; 95%), and some showed at least focal positivity for S-100 (9/22; 41%), desmin (3/8; 38%), or CD34 (2/8; 25%). All tumors were negative for neuroendocrine and epithelial markers, including synaptophysin (21 tumors), chromogranin (19), INSM1 (4), pan-K (16), CAM5.2 (13), AE1/AE3 (6), epithelial membrane antigen (20), and E-cadherin (13). DNA sequencing detected CTNNB1 point mutations in all 6 sequenced tumors: D32H, S33C, S33F, S37A, S37C, and S37F. RNA sequencing was negative for gene fusions in all 6 sequenced tumors. Clinical follow-up was available for 17 patients (74%; range: 4 mo to 20 y; median: 3.5 y), including 14 patients with >1 year of follow-up. Six of 14 patients with long-term follow-up experienced local recurrence (43%, at intervals of 3 to 6 y). One tumor showed a local lymph node metastasis within the primary excision specimen, and 3 patients developed distant lung metastases (21%). No patient died of the disease as yet. Despite its bland morphology and resemblance to the well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor, pseudoendocrine sarcoma is best considered an intermediate-grade sarcoma, given its pathologic characteristics and clinical behavior.

Surgical resection of primary tumor in the extremities improves survival for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a population-based study of the SEER database

Purpose The objectives of this study were to clarify whether resection of primary tumor in the extremities for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) improves survival, and to clarify patient groups for whom primary tumor resection should be considered. Methods/patients Using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database, we identified 1453 patients with metastatic STS of the extremities at initial presentation between 1983 and 2016. Of these 1453 patients, 898 patients underwent primary tumor resection (Surgery group), and 555 patients did not (No-surgery group). Results After adjusting for patient background by propensity score matching, a total of 804 patients were included for analysis. Patients in the Surgery group showed improved survival (cancer-specific survival (CSS) hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.71 overall survival rate (OS) HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.51–0.70). In subclass analysis, patients with high-grade STS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, or synovial sarcoma showed improved survival in the Surgery group (high grade—CSS HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45–0.72, OS HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.48–0.71; undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma—CSS HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.42–0.84, OS HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.46–0.82; leiomyosarcoma—CSS HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.33–0.75, OS HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.35–0.72; synovial sarcoma—CSS HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31–0.68, OS HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.30–0.62). Conclusions Our results indicated that primary tumor resection in metastatic STS exerts positive impacts on survival. Further clinical research is needed to confirm these results (AU)

Brain Metastasis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma at Initial Presentation.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Brain metastasis is a rare condition among patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS), and its precise incidence remains unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate which patients should be screened for brain metastasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified all patients with STS diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 in the SEER database. Incidence of brain metastasis at initial presentation and higher incidence of brain metastasis by histological subtype were investigated. In addition, risk factors for brain metastasis were examined. RESULTS: A total of 26,676 patients were included for analysis, of whom 162 patients (0.6%) had brain metastasis. Alveolar soft part sarcoma (6.3%), malignant hemangioendothelioma (3.1%) and malignant schwannoma (2.6%) showed higher incidence of brain metastasis. Deep-rooted tumor, trunk tumor, and histological high-grade tumor tended to show higher incidence of brain metastasis. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for brain metastasis were deep location, trunk development and histologically high-grade tumor, or specific histological subtypes.

Proton radiotherapy for recurrent or metastatic sarcoma with palliative quad shot.

Patients with previously treated, recurrent or metastatic sarcomas who have progressed on multiples lines of systemic therapy may have limited options for local control. We evaluated outcomes of palliative proton therapy with the quad shot regimen to unresectable disease for patients with recurrent and/or metastatic sarcoma. From 2014 to 2018, 28 patients with recurrent or metastatic sarcomas were treated to 40 total sites with palliative proton RT with quad shot (14.8 Gy/4 twice daily). Outcomes included toxicity, ability to receive further systemic therapy, and subjective palliative response. Univariate analysis was performed for local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS). Of the 40 total sites, 25 (62.5%) received ≥3 cycles with median follow up of 12 months (IQR 4-19). The most common histologies were GIST (9; 22.5%) and leiomyosarcoma (7; 17.5%). A total of 27 (67.5%) sites were located in the abdomen or pelvis. Seventeen (42.5%) treatments involved concurrent systemic therapy and 13 (32.5%) patients received further systemic therapy following proton therapy. Overall subjective palliative response was 70%. Median LPFS was 11 months and 6-month LPFS was 66.1%. On univariate analysis, receipt of four cycles of quad shot (HR 0.06, p = 0.02) and receipt of systemic therapy after completion of radiation therapy (HR 0.17, p = 0.02) were associated with improved LPFS. Three grade 3 acute toxicities were observed. The proton quad shot regimen serves as a feasible alternative for patients with previously treated, recurrent or metastatic sarcomas where overall treatment options may be limited.

Open Thrombectomy for Acute Abdominal Aortic Occlusion Due to Tumor Embolism after Lung Resection.

Arterial tumor embolization is a rare but often catastrophic complication of lung resection for malignancy. This case describes tumor embolization to the abdominal aorta in a patient with metastatic sarcoma. After partial pneumonectomy he developed acute kidney injury, bilateral lower limb ischemia and spinal cord ischemia. Computed tomography angiogram demonstrated complete occlusion of the paravisceral aorta. Perfusion was restored with open thromboembolectomies of the abdominal aorta, superior mesenteric artery and bilateral lower limbs. For perioperative lung cancer patients with acute arterial occlusion intraluminal tumor should be considered and thereby an open approach to revascularisation adopted.

Surgical Stabilization for Patients with Mechanical Back Pain Secondary to Metastatic Spinal Disease is Associated with Improved Objective Mobility Metrics: Preliminary Analysis in a Cohort of 26 Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of surgical stabilization for patients with metastatic spinal disease on objective mobility metrics. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified patients who had mechanical back pain from metastatic spinal disease and underwent spinal stabilization during 2017. Mobility metrics, the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) inpatient mobility short form (IMSF) and the Johns Hopkins Highest Level of Mobility (JH-HLM), were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients were included in the analysis with median hospital stay of 8 days. Preoperative JH-HLM scores were available for 17 patients with a mean score of 5.4, increasing to mean score of 6.6 at last follow-up (P = 0.036). Preoperative AM-PAC IMSF scores were available for 14 patients with a mean score of 19.4, decreasing slightly to a mean score of 18.7 at last follow-up (P = 0.367). Last follow-up with mobility metrics occurred a median of 6.5 days postoperatively (range: 3-66 days). Multivariable analysis showed that American Spinal Injury Association and Karnofsky Performance Status scores were significantly associated with both JH-HLM and AM-PAC mobility scores at last follow-up. A higher JH-HLM or AM-PAC score was significantly associated with direct home discharge and a higher AM-PAC score was associated with shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical stabilization for patients with mechanical back pain secondary to metastatic spinal disease might lead to an objective improvement in JH-HLM score. JH-HLM and AM-PAC scores may be correlated with length of hospital stay and discharge disposition. Future studies are encouraged to further characterize the role of these mobility metrics in the management plan of these patients.

Surgical resection of primary tumor in the extremities improves survival for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a population-based study of the SEER database.

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were to clarify whether resection of primary tumor in the extremities for patients with metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) improves survival, and to clarify patient groups for whom primary tumor resection should be considered. METHODS/PATIENTS: Using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database, we identified 1453 patients with metastatic STS of the extremities at initial presentation between 1983 and 2016. Of these 1453 patients, 898 patients underwent primary tumor resection (Surgery group), and 555 patients did not (No-surgery group). RESULTS: After adjusting for patient background by propensity score matching, a total of 804 patients were included for analysis. Patients in the Surgery group showed improved survival (cancer-specific survival (CSS) hazard ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50-0.71 overall survival rate (OS) HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.70). In subclass analysis, patients with high-grade STS, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, or synovial sarcoma showed improved survival in the Surgery group (high grade-CSS HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45-0.72, OS HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.71; undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma-CSS HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.42-0.84, OS HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.46-0.82; leiomyosarcoma-CSS HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.75, OS HR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.35-0.72; synovial sarcoma-CSS HR = 0.46, 95% CI 0.31-0.68, OS HR = 0.43, 95% CI 0.30-0.62). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that primary tumor resection in metastatic STS exerts positive impacts on survival. Further clinical research is needed to confirm these results.

Interim Analysis of the Phase II Study: Noninferiority Study of Doxorubicin with Upfront Dexrazoxane plus Olaratumab for Advanced or Metastatic Soft-Tissue Sarcoma.

PURPOSE: To report the interim analysis of the phase II single-arm noninferiority trial, testing the upfront use of dexrazoxane with doxorubicin on progression-free survival (PFS) and cardiac function in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable STS who were candidates for first-line treatment with doxorubicin were deemed eligible. An interim analysis was initiated after 33 of 65 patients were enrolled. Using the historical control of 4.6 months PFS for doxorubicin in the front-line setting, we tested whether the addition of dexrazoxane affected the efficacy of doxorubicin in STS. The study was powered so that a decrease of PFS to 3.7 months would be considered noninferior. Secondary aims included cardiac-related mortality, incidence of heart failure/cardiomyopathy, and expansion of cardiac monitoring parameters including three-dimensional echocardiography. Patients were allowed to continue on doxorubicin beyond 600 mg/m2 if they were deriving benefit and were not demonstrating evidence of symptomatic cardiac dysfunction. RESULTS: At interim analysis, upfront use of dexrazoxane with doxorubicin demonstrated a PFS of 8.4 months (95% confidence interval: 5.1-11.2 months). Only 3 patients were removed from study for cardiotoxicity, all on > 600 mg/m2 doxorubicin. No patients required cardiac hospitalization or had new, persistent cardiac dysfunction with left ventricular ejection fraction remaining below 50%. The median administered doxorubicin dose was 450 mg/m2 (interquartile range, 300-750 mg/m2). CONCLUSIONS: At interim analysis, dexrazoxane did not reduce PFS in patients with STS treated with doxorubicin. Involvement of cardio-oncologists is beneficial for the monitoring and safe use of high-dose anthracyclines in STS.See related commentary by Benjamin and Minotti, p. 3809.

Development and Validation of Novel Nomograms for Predicting Specific Distant Metastatic Sites and Overall Survival of Patients With Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study is to construct nomograms to effectively predict the distant metastatic sites and overall survival (OS) of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. METHODS: STS case data between 2010 and 2015 for retrospective study were gathered from public databases. According to the chi-square and multivariate logistic regression analysis determined independent predictive factors of specific metastatic sites, the nomograms based on these factors were consturced. Subsequently, combined metastatic information a nomogram to predict 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS of STS patients was developed. The performance of models was validated by the area under the curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision curve analyses (DCA). RESULTS: A total of 7001 STS patients were included in this retrospective study, including 4901 cases in the training group and the remaining 2,100 patients in the validation group. Three nomograms were established to predict lung, liver and bone metastasis, and satisfactory results have been obtained by internal and external validation. The AUCs for predicting lung, liver, and bone metastases in the training cohort were 0.796, 0.799, and 0.766, respectively, and in the validation cohort were 0.807, 0.787, and 0.775, respectively, which means that the nomograms have good discrimination. The calibration curves showed that the models have high precision, and the DCA manifested that the nomograms have great clinical application prospects. Through univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses, 8 independent prognosis factors of age, grade, histological type, tumor size, surgery, chemotherapy, radiatiotherapy and lung metastasis were determined. A nomogram was then constructed to predict the 1-, 2-, and 3-years OS, which has a good performance in both internal and external validations. CONCLUSION: The nomograms for predicting specific metastatic sites and OS have good discrimination, accuracy and clinical applicability. The models could accurately predict the metastatic risk and survival information, and help clinical decision-making.

Interstitial single fraction brachytherapy for malignant pulmonary tumours.

PURPOSE: Interstitial brachytherapy for pulmonary tumours is an alternative to stereotactic radiotherapy, allowing high conformity despite it being an invasive technique. The aim of the study was the analysis of dose distribution, toxicity and tumour response rates. METHODS: In the years 2014-2019, 27 patients with pulmonary tumours received 36 interstitial brachytherapies with Ir-192: 11 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, 16 patients with pulmonary metastases of other entities. RESULTS: Patients were treated with a median (interquartile range) prescription dose of 20 (20-26) Gy in a single fraction. Mean lung dose to the ipsilateral lung was 2.8 (1.6-4.7) Gy. Maximum doses to the heart, oesophagus, thoracic wall and spinal cord were 2.4 (1.8-4.6) Gy, 2.0 (1.2-6.2) Gy, 12.6 (8.0-18.2) Gy and 1.5 (0.6-3.9) Gy. Median survival after treatment was 15 months, with a 1- and 2­year local control of 84% and 60%. Median overall survival after initial cancer diagnosis was 94 months; 2 years following brachytherapy, 75% of patients with colorectal cancer vs. 37% with other histologies were alive; p = 0.14. In 69% (n = 25), brachytherapy could be performed without acute complications. A self-limiting bleeding occurred in 8% (n = 3), fever in 3% (n = 1), pneumothorax in 17% (n = 6), and pulmonary failure in 3% (n = 1). Patients with > 20 Gy in 95% of planning target volume had higher pneumothorax rates needing intervention (31% vs. 5%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Interstitial brachytherapy for pulmonary tumours is a highly conformal therapy with minimal doses to the organs at risk. For the majority of patients, treatment can be performed without relevant complications in a single fraction with a satisfactory local control.

Should metastatic lymph nodes be considered at the same clinical stage as distant metastasis in soft tissue sarcomas?

INTRODUCTION: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) in soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are uncommon, occurring in only 3% - 5% of all sarcomas, and are classified as Stage IV, along with distant metastasis (DM). This paper compares the prognosis of patients with lymphatic and DM, in extremity STS (eSTS). METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out in a high-volume sarcoma center; 853 patients with eSTS sarcomas were identified and classified from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2017. Cases with pathological confirmation of LNM were included. Five-year survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: LNM was present in 46 of the cases (5.4%), with an overall survival of 21 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.7 - 25.2), compared to 18 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.2 - 21.7) in those with only DM. Median recurrence-free survival was 21 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.7 - 22.4), vs. 20 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.2- 23.7), respectively. LNM only and DM only had also a similar OS of 21 months (95% CI 16.7-25.2) vs 18 months (95% CI 14.2-21.7. N1M1 cases had the worse median OS with 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.9-19.7) CONCLUSIONS: Overall survival and recurrence free survival in patients with lymph node disease and metastatic disease are similar. However prognosis is worse in N1M1. Use of systemic treatment in patients with LNM is not as common as in metastatic cases, this difference in treatment and the fact that prognosis is similar suggests that both biological behavior and effect of treatment have been underestimated. A subclassification of clinical stage IV might be the next step.

Real-world outcomes of patients with locally advanced or metastatic epithelioid sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the real-world effectiveness and safety of systemic therapies for advanced (surgically unresectable and/or metastatic) epithelioid sarcoma (ES). METHODS: A retrospective medical records review was conducted in patients with advanced ES who were initiating first-line or ≥2 lines of systemic therapy (2000-2017) at 5 US cancer centers. The real-world overall response rate (rwORR), the duration of response (rwDOR), the disease control rate (rwDCR) (defined as stable disease for ≥32 weeks or any duration of response), and progression-free survival (rwPFS) were assessed by radiology reports. Overall survival (OS), rwDOR, and rwPFS were estimated from the time therapy was initiated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Serious adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Of 74 patients (median age at diagnosis, 33 years; range, 10.6-76.3 years), 72% were male, and 85% had metastatic disease. The median number of lines of therapy was 2 (range, 1-7 lines of therapy), and 46 patients (62%) received ≥2 lines of systemic therapy. First-line regimens were usually anthracycline-based (54%) or gemcitabine-based (24%). For patients receiving first-line systemic therapy, the rwORR was 15%, the rwDCR was 20%, the median rwDOR was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.1-5.2 months), the median rwPFS was 2.5 months (95% CI, 1.7, 6.9 months), and the median OS was 15.2 months (95% CI, 11.4-21.7 months). For those who received ≥2 lines of systemic therapy, the rwORR was 9%, the rwDCR was 20%, the median rwDOR was 4.5 months (95% CI, 0.7-5.6 months), and the median rwPFS was 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.2-7.4 months). Over one-half of patients (51.4%) experienced an adverse event, most frequently febrile neutropenia (14%), pain (10%), anemia, dyspnea, fever, thrombocytopenia, or transaminitis (5% each). CONCLUSIONS: Systemic therapies demonstrate limited efficacy in patients with advanced ES and have associated toxicities.

A case of primary distal-type epithelioid sarcoma of the lumbar vertebra with a review of literature.

Epithelioid sarcoma (EpS) is a rare malignant neoplasm that accounts for < 1% of adult soft tissue sarcomas. Primary EpS of the bone is extremely rare and only a few cases have been reported to date. We report a case of primary distal-type EpS of the lumbar vertebra. A 30-year-old man without any history of malignant tumors had complained of lumbago for 3 months before visiting the hospital. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine showed a high signal intensity on the fat-suppressed T2-weighted image (WI) and a low signal on the T1WI at the L1 vertebral body. The tumor protruded toward the anterior components. Systemic radiological examination revealed no other lesion. A biopsy revealed a primary malignant tumor with epithelioid features. After chemotherapy, total en bloc spondylectomy was performed. Macroscopically, the tumor replaced the entire L1 with necrosis. Histologically, the tumor showed nodules of epithelioid cells that were strongly positive for epithelial markers, but a lack of INI1 expression. Central necrosis in the tumor nodule was also observed. This tumor showed loss of heterozygosity at the SMARCB1 locus but without the SMARCB1 mutation. The result of Foundation One ®CDx showed no actionable mutations. Seven months after surgery, a subcutaneous metastasis to the left cheek and bilateral lung metastasis with pleural dissemination were observed on radiological examination. A final diagnosis of distal-type EpS was made based on these findings. The patient died of the disease 8 months after surgery.

Surgical Outcomes and Risk Analysis of Primary Pulmonary Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Primary pulmonary sarcoma (PPS) is a rare malignant lung neoplasm, and there is very little medical evidence about treatment of PPS. The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcome of patients who underwent surgical resection for PPS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent surgical resection for PPS in our institution between 1995 and 2014. Cases who only underwent biopsy were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 24 patients (18 males, 6 females), with a median age of 60 (interquartile range: 44-67) years, were analyzed. The surgical procedures performed in these patients were pneumonectomy (n = 10), lobectomy (n = 11), and wedge resection (n = 3). Complete resection was achieved in 16 patients. The pathological stages (tumor, node, metastases lung cancer classification, 8th edition) of the patients were I (n = 4), II (n = 12), III (n = 2), and IV (n = 5), and there were four cases of lymph node metastasis. The 5-year overall survival rate of the patients was 50% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29-72). Adverse prognostic factors for overall survival were incomplete resection (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.1-42), advanced pathological stage (HR 14, 95% CI: 2.8-66), higher pathological grade (HR 4.5, 95% CI: 1.2-17), and tumor size ≥ 7 cm (HR 4.7, 95% CI: 1.1-21). CONCLUSIONS: Our series of PPS revealed that incomplete resection, advanced pathological stage, higher pathological grade, and tumor size were unfavorable factors for long-term survival.

A review of staging chest CT in trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of pulmonary metastases on chest CT in trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma based on two size criteria, and to identify factors associated with metastases. METHODS: Retrospective review of chest CT studies in patients with trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma over an 18-month period. Data collected included patient age/sex, tumour location, size and relationship to fascia. All chest CTs were reviewed for the presence of metastases which were diagnosed according to two size criteria: multiple nodules > 5 mm in size or multiple nodules > 10 mm in size. Follow-up CT studies were reviewed in cases initially considered indeterminate. RESULTS: 127 males and 73 females were included (mean age 57.1 years; range 10-90 years). 147 (73.5%) tumours were deep to the fascia and 53 (26.5%) superficial. Tumour size classified according to the 12 AJCC 2019 criteria was: T1 = 52, T2 = 76, T3 = 39, T4 = 33. Based on nodule size >5 mm, 73 (36.5%) patients had no metastases, 42 (21%) had metastases, while 85 (42.5%) studies were indeterminate. Based on nodule size >10 mm, 73 (36.5%) patients had no metastases, 28 (14%) had metastases, while 99 (49.5%) studies were indeterminate. Larger maximum dimension of the primary tumour was a risk factor for pulmonary metastases using both size criteria. CONCLUSION: The incidence of pulmonary metastases at presentation in trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma is 14-21%. 42.5-49.5% of chest CTs were indeterminate. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The incidence of pulmonary metastases at presentation in trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma is 14-21%. Indeterminate pulmonary nodules are also very common.