UVA1 irradiation attenuates collagen production via Ficz/AhR/MAPK signaling activation in scleroderma.

Scleroderma is an autoimmune disease mainly characterized by progressive fibrosis of the skin. There are two types of scleroderma, namely localized scleroderma (LS) and systemic sclerosis (SSc); skin lesions in both types of scleroderma are histologically identical. Progressive skin sclerosis induces psychological and ecological burden for scleroderma patients. However, there is no effective treatment for scleroderma due to its unclear etiology. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is recognized as an environmental chemical effector that can respond to ultraviolet radiation, which has been demonstrated to participate in the pathogenesis of SSc in our previous study. In this study, we verify whether the anti-fibrosis effect of ultraviolet A1 (UVA1) phototherapy could be partially induced through Ficz/AhR/MAPK signaling activation for fibrotic lesions in both SSc and LS patients. This is the first study to show the association between the AhR pathway and the anti-fibrotic mechanism of UVA1 phototherapy, which provides additional evidence of the role of AhR in the fibrotic mechanism of systemic scleroderma from different perspectives. Ficz and other AhR agonists may replace UVA1 phototherapy as anti-fibrotic agents in scleroderma.

Clinical and laboratory characterization of patients with localized scleroderma and response to UVA-1 phototherapy: In vivo and in vitro skin models.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Localized scleroderma (LS) is a rare disease leading to progressive hardening and induration of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. LS is responsive to UVA-1 phototherapy, though its exact mechanism of action dermal fibrosis is yet to be fully elucidated. We aimed to investigate the molecular changes induced by UVA-1 rays in human primary fibroblasts cultures. METHODS: A total of 16 LS patients were treated with medium-dose UVA-1 phototherapy. At baseline, during and after therapy, Localized Scleroderma Assessment Tool, Dermatology Life Quality Index and lesions' staging and mapping were performed along with high-frequency ultrasound (HFUS) examination for dermal thickness assessment. Gene expression analysis for 23 mRNA transcripts, in vitro UVA-1 irradiation and viability tests were realized on lesional fibroblasts' primary cultures, before and 3 months after therapy. RESULTS: The dermal thickness, the LoSCAT and the DLQI progressively decreased starting from the last phototherapy session up to the 6 and 9 month follow-ups (-57% and -60%, respectively). Molecular gene analysis (rt-PCR) revealed that UVA-1 phototherapy exerts multiple effects: the activation of specific anti-fibrotic pathways (e.g., overexpression of CTHRC1 and metalloproteases 1, 2, 7, 8, 9, 12, suppression of TIMP-1), the downregulation of peculiar pro-fibrotic pathways (e.g., downregulation of TGF-ß, TGF-ßrII, Grb2, SMAD 2/3, TNRSF12A, CTGF) through a significant overexpression of IL-1ß; the stabilization of collagen synthesis acting on genes COL1A1, COL3A1, COL8A1, COL10A1, COL12A1. CONCLUSION: UVA-1 phototherapy adds significant benefits in local tissue remodeling, rebalancing the alteration between pro-fibrotic and anti-fibrotic pathways; these changes can be well monitored by HFUS.

Biological effects of a new ultraviolet A1 prototype based on light-emitting diodes on the treatment of localized scleroderma.

Ultraviolet A1 (UVA1 ) phototherapy (spectral range 340-400 nm) is a well-established treatment option for various skin diseases such as localized scleroderma. Recent improvements of conventional UVA1 light sources (metal-halide or fluorescent lamps) have brought attention to a new light-emitting diode (LED) technology with remarkable advantages in handling and clinical routine. This study provides a preclinical histological and molecular evaluation of an LED-based UVA1 prototype with a narrower spectral range (360-400 nm) for treating localized scleroderma. Scleroderma mouse models and fibroblasts in vitro were exposed to LED-based UVA1 phototherapy or to irradiation with a commercially available metal-halide lamp emitting low-dose (20, 40 J/cm2 ), medium-dose (60 J/cm2 ) and high-dose (80, 100 J/cm2 ) UVA1 light. Both UVA1 light sources affected inflammatory genes (IL-1α and IL-6) and growth factors (TGFß-1 and TGFß-2). Increased collagen type 1 was reduced after UVA1 phototherapy. Matrix metalloproteinase-1 was more enhanced after a medium dose of LED-based UVA1 phototherapy than after conventional treatment. In vivo, dermal thickness and the amount of collagen were reduced after both treatment methods. Remarkably, myofibroblasts were more effectively reduced by a medium dose of LED-based UVA1 phototherapy. The study indicates that LED-based UVA1 phototherapy yields similar or even better results than conventional treatment. In terms of biosafety and patient comfort, LED-based UVA1 phototherapy offers clear advantages over conventional treatment because of the use of a narrower and less harmful UVA1 spectrum, less heat generation and shorter treatment times at the same irradiation intensity. Clinical studies are required to confirm these results in patients with localized scleroderma.

Ultraviolet A1 phototherapy for the treatment of localized scleroderma.

Ultraviolet (UV)A1 phototherapy is effective for T-cell-mediated skin diseases such as atopic dermatitis and mast cell-mediated skin diseases such as mastocytoma. UVA1 phototherapy is also effective against the sclerotic lesions of systemic sclerosis and morphea. Currently, in Japan, access to UVA1 phototherapy is limited because the UVA1 phototherapy device has not yet been approved. On the basis of our experience, we report three patients with localized scleroderma who responded successfully to UVA1 phototherapy. Efficacy was assessed by histological analysis and elastography. UVA1 successfully ameliorated sclerotic lesions, including morphea, linear scleroderma and morphea lesions in a patient with limited cutaneous systemic sclerosis. No side-effects were observed during UVA1 phototherapy.

Clinical, histological and high-frequency ultrasonographic evaluation (50 MHz) of morphoea treated with ultraviolet A1 phototherapy.

BACKGROUND: There are few studies in the literature correlating the ultrasonographic findings, clinical scoring systems or histological findings in morphoea after ultraviolet (UV)A1 phototherapy. AIMS: To evaluate the quantitative and morphological aspects of high-frequency ultrasonography in the treatment of plaque morphoea in response to UVA1 phototherapy, and to correlate these with clinical and histological scores. METHODS: In total, 17 patients with morphoea were studied. Initially and at study end, high-frequency ultrasonography (50 MHz) was performed on the edge of a morphoea lesion treated with UVA1 phototherapy. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of dermal features was performed and compared with the features of healthy skin. Skin biopsy specimens were obtained from lesions analysed at the beginning and end of the study, assessing dermal sclerosis and dermal inflammatory infiltrate and their distribution. RESULTS: All affected skin showed a statistically significant increase in dermal thickness and hypoechogenicity, corresponding to a reduction in dermal density by ultrasonography compared with healthy skin. Morphological evaluation identified undulations of the dermis in 11 of 17 lesions (64.7%) and in 5 healthy skin areas (29.4%) (P = 0.08), while 'yoyo' figures were identified in 8 lesions (47%) but only 1 healthy skin area (5.9%) (P = 0.02). Ultrasonographic morphological analysis highlighted an improvement in dermal hyperechogenic bands and disappearance of yoyo figures after UVA1 treatment. Histology revealed a reduction in dermal sclerosis and inflammation, although this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic pattern analysis of morphoea is a suitable technique for monitoring UVA1 phototherapy response.

The safety and efficacy of light emitting diodes-based ultraviolet A1 phototherapy in bleomycin-induced scleroderma in mice.

PURPOSE: To define the efficacy and safety of narrowband ultraviolet A1 (UVA1) for the treatment of dermal fibrosis in bleomycin-induced mouse model of scleroderma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 42 DBA/2 strain mice were included in the study: healthy mice and mice with established scleroderma, treated with high or medium dose of UVA1. Non-treated groups served as control. The equipment emitting 365±5nm UVA1 radiation was used in the study. The average cumulative doses were 1200J/cm2 for high and 600J/cm2 for medium dose course. Histological analysis was performed for the evaluation of the dermal thickness and mast cells density. The expressions of p53 and Ki-67 proteins were assessed by immunohistochemical analyses. RESULTS: Skin thickness of mice with scleroderma, treated with high and medium dose of UVA1, were lower (272.9±113.2µm and 394±125.9µm, respectively) in comparison to the dermal thickness of non-treated animals (599±55.7µm). The dermal mast cells count in mice with scleroderma was reduced after high and medium dose treatment to 11±1.7 and 13±2.2, respectively, as compared to that in non-treated mice (23±3.0). No significant upregulation of p53 nor Ki-67 proteins was observed in the skin of healthy mice and mice with scleroderma after high- and medium-dose of UVA1. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that 365nm UVA1 with the cumulative doses of 1200J/cm2 and 600J/cm2 is safe and effective for the dermal fibrosis treatment.

The impact of high-dose narrowband ultraviolet A1 on dermal thickness, collagen and matrix-metalloproteinases in animal model of scleroderma.

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of the present study was to define the impact of high-dose of 365±5nm ultraviolet A1 (UVA1) on dermal fibrosis in the pre-established, bleomycin-induced mouse model of scleroderma. METHODS: DBA/2 strain mice with the pre-established, bleomycin-induced scleroderma were irradiated with cumulative UVA1 dose of 1200J/cm2 and in parallel were challenged with prolonged administration of bleomycin. Non-treated groups served as the control. Light source emitting a narrow band UVA1 light of 365±5nm and 21mW/cm2 power density was used in the study. Histological analysis was performed for the evaluation of dermal thickness. The expressions of matrix-metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1), matrix-metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), collagen types I and III were evaluated by immunohistochemical analyses. The Mann - Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Dermal thickness in mice injected with bleomycin during all the experiment (8weeks) and irradiated with UVA1 for the last 5weeks was significantly lower than that in mice challenged only with bleomycin for 8weeks (253.96±31.83µm and 497.43±57.83µm, respectively; P=0.002). The dermal thickness after phototherapy was lower as compared with the pre-existing fibrotic changes observed after 3weeks of bleomycin injections (253.96±31.83µm and 443.87±41.76µm, respectively; P=0.002). High-dose of UVA1 induced the 5.8- and 5.2-fold increase in MMP-1 and MMP-3 expressions, respectively, and the 1.2- and 1.4-fold decrease in collagen type I and collagen type III expressions in the pre-established, bleomycin-induced scleroderma model as compared to that in the control non-irradiated mice (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our study has demonstrated that a cumulative 365±5nm UVA1 radiation dosage of 1200J/cm2 not only prevents the progression of dermal fibrosis, but also induces a regression of pre-existing fibrotic changes.

Phototherapy for sclerosing skin conditions.

Phototherapy is an effective treatment strategy for a variety of sclerosing skin conditions. There are a number of phototherapeutic modalities used for the treatment of sclerosing skin conditions, including ultraviolet (UV)A1, broadband UVA, psoralen plus UVA, and narrowband UVB phototherapy. As controlled trials with validated outcome measures are lacking for these therapies, existing evidence is largely level II for morphea and is even more minimal for scleroderma and other sclerosing disorders (scleroderma, lichen sclerosus, and chronic graft-versus-host disease, among others). Studies do suggest that phototherapy may be effective for many of these disorders, including those that have been unresponsive to other therapies. Phototherapy remains an attractive therapeutic option for patients due to its efficacy and favorable risk-versus-benefit profile. Phototherapy also offers a therapeutic alternative to systemic immunosuppressives for patients who cannot tolerate these medications.

Fractional carbon dioxide laser versus low-dose UVA-1 phototherapy for treatment of localized scleroderma: a clinical and immunohistochemical randomized controlled study.

Morphea is a rare fibrosing skin disorder that occurs as a result of abnormal homogenized collagen synthesis. Fractional ablative laser resurfacing has been used effectively in scar treatment via abnormal collagen degradation and induction of healthy collagen synthesis. Therefore, fractional ablative laser can provide an effective modality in treatment of morphea. The study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser as a new modality for the treatment of localized scleroderma and to compare its results with the well-established method of UVA-1 phototherapy. Seventeen patients with plaque and linear morphea were included in this parallel intra-individual comparative randomized controlled clinical trial. Each with two comparable morphea lesions that were randomly assigned to either 30 sessions of low-dose (30 J/cm2) UVA-1 phototherapy (340-400 nm) or 3 sessions of fractional CO2 laser (10,600 nm-power 25 W). The response to therapy was then evaluated clinically and histopathologically via validated scoring systems. Immunohistochemical analysis of TGF-ß1 and MMP1 was done. Patient satisfaction was also assessed. Wilcoxon signed rank test for paired (matched) samples and Spearman rank correlation equation were used as indicated. Comparing the two groups, there was an obvious improvement with fractional CO2 laser that was superior to that of low-dose UVA-1 phototherapy. Statistically, there was a significant difference in the clinical scores (p = 0.001), collagen homogenization scores (p = 0.012), and patient satisfaction scores (p = 0.001). In conclusion, fractional carbon dioxide laser is a promising treatment modality for cases of localized morphea, with proved efficacy of this treatment on clinical and histopathological levels.

Ultraviolet phototherapy for cutaneous diseases: a concise review.

Phototherapy is the use of non-ionizing radiation, primarily in the ultraviolet spectrum, to treat disease. In dermatology, ultraviolet (UV) phototherapy remains an established, lower cost, and often preferred option for many common skin conditions, despite the introduction of newer potent biologics. This article introduces a principal therapeutic modality in the treatment of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis (eczema), vitiligo, and morphea among other diseases where oral manifestations may be present, providing basic information about the use of UVA, UVB, and PUVA. Practical considerations and side effects of phototherapy are described. Phototherapy is an effective treatment for many illnesses and carries a relatively benign side-effect profile.

Radiation-induced morphoea treated with UVA-1 phototherapy.

Morphoea is a localized inflammatory disorder of the dermis and subcutaneous fat and radiotherapy is a rarely reported cause (estimated incidence of 2 per 1000). Morphoea is commonly mistaken for an inflammatory recurrence of breast cancer, resulting in unnecessary investigations and treatment. We report the case of a 40-year-old woman who developed radiation-induced morphoea of the breast 7 months following adjuvant radiotherapy. She was treated with topical and systemic steroids as well as psoralen plus ultraviolet (UV)A before proceeding to UVA1 phototherapy. We also review the literature and discuss other management options.

Recurrence of morphea after successful ultraviolet A1 phototherapy: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Studies support efficacy of ultraviolet (UV)A1 phototherapy, but little is known about recurrence after successful UVA1 treatment. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the frequency of recurrent activity after UVA1 phototherapy and variables associated with recurrence. METHODS: This was a case series and prospective cohort study of patients treated with UVA1 phototherapy with minimum 6 months of follow-up. Demographics, clinical features, and cumulative UVA1 dose were analyzed for association with recurrence. RESULTS: Of 37 patients, 46% (n = 17) had recurrence of active morphea lesions after successful UVA1 phototherapy. Two-year and 3-year (after the last UVA1 phototherapy treatment) recurrence rates were 44.5% (95% confidence interval 30.1%-62.2%) and 48.4% (95% confidence interval 33.2%-66.1%), respectively. The only variable associated with recurrence was duration of morphea before UVA1 (P value = .02, hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 1.06-1.27). LIMITATIONS: The sample size limits conclusions. CONCLUSION: With the exception of increased duration of morphea, risk of recurrence is no different in adults and children, or between morphea subtypes, skin types, and medium- to high-dose regimens. This indicates treatment doses in the medium-high UVA1 range are adequate with respect to frequency of recurrence.

Pulsed dye laser in the treatment of localized scleroderma and its effects on CD34+ and factor XIIIa+ cells: an immunohistochemical study.

BACKGROUND: Localized scleroderma (morphea) is characterized by hardening and thickening of the dermis due to excessive collagen deposition. A decreased number of CD34+ cells and an increased number of Factor XIIIa+ cells are seen in the affected skin. The flashlamp pulsed dye laser (FLPDL) has been used in the treatment of localized morphea with promising results. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of the pulsed dye laser in localized scleroderma and to assess its effect on CD34+ cells, Factor XIIIa+ cells, and blood vessels. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty patients with plaque morphea were treated with a FLPDL (585 nm wavelength, 450 µs pulse duration). Fluence ranged from 7.5 to 8.5 J/cm(2). Sessions were performed biweekly for a maximum of 6 months. Clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical assessments were performed. RESULTS: Patients showed varying degrees of improvement of indurated skin. There was no worsening or further improvement at the treated sites during the follow-up assessments at 3, 6, and 12 months. An increased number of CD34+ cells were found in both the upper and the lower dermis, and a decreased number of Factor XIIIa+ cells were found in the lower dermis. CONCLUSION: The FLPDL is effective in the treatment of morphea, as confirmed by the changes in the pathologic tissue and levels of CD34+ and Factor XIIIa+ cells.

"Assessment of chronic sclerodermoid Graft-versus-Host Disease patients, using 20 MHz high-frequency ultrasonography and cutometer methods".

The development of an adverse graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) is a major complication of stem cell transplantations, which are widely used to cure increasing number of hematologic malignancies. Patients with chronic GvHD are at risk of joint contractures secondary to sclerodermatous skin changes. Several clinical scores or serologic markers have been used to assess skin sclerosis in scleroderma patients. Evaluation of sclerotic skin changes using biometric tools remains to be challenging. The purpose of this study was to illustrate and exemplify ultrasound measurement and measurement of skin elasticity of five chronic sclerodermoid GvHD patients. There is still a substantial lack of studies using objective and non-invasive methods helpful in assessment of patients with skin involvement of GvHD. Although ultrasound is not the ideal method, it is worth emphasizing that it is still useful, non-invasive, and repeatable device in monitoring patients suffering from GvHD. It should also be added, that it seems to be advisable to repeat USG examination at an interval of 3 months after the treatment. In addition, skin echogenicity may be a more sensitive parameter than skin thickness in assessment of cGvHD patients.

La radiación UVA-1: un nuevo aporte en la fototerapia dermatológica / Ultraviolet radiation A1 (UVA-1): therapeutic use in dermatology

La radiación ultravioleta ha sido usada durante décadas para el tratamiento de diversas enfermedades cutáneas. La radiación ultravioleta A1 (UVA-1) que tiene una longitud de onda entre los 340nm y 400 nm está disponible desde el año 1981, pero recién en las últimas dos décadas se ha estudiado, publicado y reportado su potencial uso terapéutico en la dermatología. Los primeros beneficios de su uso se reportaron en la dermatitis atópica donde se utilizaron dosis altas de UVA-1 para tratar las exacerbaciones severas de esta condición. Luego, nuevas indicaciones terapéuticas de su uso se fueron expandiendo a otras enfermedades cutáneas tales como: morfea, liquen escleroso, queratosis liquenoide, linfomacutáneo de células T y otras dermatopatías. La radiación UVA-1 al tener una longitud de onda más larga penetra a las capas más profundas de la dermis, lo que le permite una acción en la modificación de la respuesta inflamatoria, la respuesta inmunológica y los mecanismos de reparación cutánea.

Ultraviolet light radiation has been used for decades for the treatment of several cutaneous diseases. The ultraviolet radiation A1 (UVA-1) with a wave length between 340 nm-400 nm has been available since 1981, but only in the last two decades it has been studied and published for therapeutic use in dermatology. The first reported benefits of its use were reported in atopic dermatitis in which high doses of UVA-1were used to treat severe exacerbations of this condition. Thereafter, new therapeutic indications expanded its use for other cutaneous diseases like: morphea, lichen sclerosus, lichenoid keratosis, cutaneous T cell lymphoma and other skin conditions. The UVA-1 radiation has a long wavelength that make possible to reach the deep dermis and to modify the inflammatory response, immunological response and the cutaneous repair mechanisms.

Phototherapy in the age of biologics.

Dermatologists are presented with a diversity of therapeutic modalities for the treatment of inflammatory, sclerosing, and neoplastic conditions, but with the development of various new irradiation devices that utilize specific parts of the electromagnetic spectrum, phototherapy has become a more viable, accessible, and efficacious option in the treatment of these conditions. The ultraviolet (UV) range (10-400 nm) is further subdivided into UVA and UVB, each of which has been particularly useful in a number of skin conditions. The most commonly used forms of UV irradiation are UVA1, psoralen plus UVA (PUVA), and narrowband (NB) UVB. Each of these modalities differ in their mechanism of action, indications, and side effect profiles, and it is important that clinicians be familiar with these differences. Today, phototherapy is a valuable option in the treatment of many nonpsoriatic conditions including atopic dermatitis, sclerosing skin conditions such as morphea, vitiligo, and mycosis fungoides. Due to its relative safety, phototherapy may be used in most populations, including children and pregnant women. However, contraindications and side effects are known and should be considered before patients begin a phototherapeutic regimen.

Effectiveness of medium-dose ultraviolet A1 phototherapy in localized scleroderma.

BACKGROUND: Recently, ultraviolet (UV) A1 phototherapy has been suggested as an effective treatment for localized scleroderma (LS); however, the optimal dose of UVA1 still has not been determined. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of medium-dose (30 J/cm(2) ) UVA1 phototherapy and to show that 13MHz ultrasound is a valuable tool for assessing the results of UVA1 phototherapy in LS. METHODS: Thirty-five patients with LS were treated with medium-dose (30J/cm(2) ) UVA1. In total, 30-45 treatments and 900-1350J/cm(2) cumulative UVA1 doses were evaluated by clinical scoring in all patients. In 14 patients, skin thickness was also determined by 13MHz ultrasound examination. RESULTS: In all patients, medium-dose UVA1 therapy softened sclerotic plaques, and marked clinical improvement was observed in 29 of 35 (82. 85%) patients. Ultrasound measurements showed that skin thickness was significantly reduced. No side effects were observed during or after treatment. CONCLUSION: Medium-dose UVA1 phototherapy is a highly effective, safe, and well-tolerated therapeutic modality for treatment of all types of LS. A 13MHz ultrasound probe may be used for evaluating UVA1 phototherapy results.

A systematic review of morphea treatments and therapeutic algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Morphea (localized scleroderma) is a skin disorder with significant morbidity. No consistent recommendations exist for therapy, impeding patient care. OBJECTIVE: We sought to create an evidence-based therapeutic algorithm. METHODS: We reviewed English-language literature using search engines and hand searches for therapeutic interventions in morphea. Results were summarized. RESULTS: Narrowband ultraviolet B is appropriate for progressive or widespread superficial dermal lesions; broadband ultraviolet A/ultraviolet A-1 is appropriate for widespread or progressive deeper dermal lesions. Systemic treatment with methotrexate, corticosteroids, or both is indicated for deep or function-impairing lesions and rapidly progressive or widespread (severe) disease. Topical treatment with calcipotriene or tacrolimus is supported for limited, superficial, inflammatory lesions. Use of oral calcipotriol, D-penicillamine, interferon gamma, and antimalarials is not supported. LIMITATIONS: Limitations are publication bias; lack of adequately powered, controlled trials; and no validated outcome measures. CONCLUSION: Phototherapy, methotrexate/systemic corticosteroids, calcipotriene, and topical tacrolimus have the most evidence for efficacy in morphea. Treatment works best in inflammatory disease. Disease activity, severity, progression, and depth should play a role in therapeutic decision making.