Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
3.
J Affect Disord ; 118(1-3): 113-7, 2009 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19272652

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The 8-item "Scale for Atypical Symptoms" (SAS) and its structured interview, the SIGH-SAD, have been developed to assess atypical symptoms of depression in winter depression. Although they are commonly used, no validation study has yet been conducted. METHODS: 270 consecutive depressed inpatients were assessed prospectively. Pearson's correlation coefficients between fulfilment of Liebowitz criteria for atypical depression and both the SAS score and the atypical balance [ratio of the AS score to the total score on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 29-item (HDRS-29)] were calculated. The SAS was evaluated against Liebowitz criteria using binary logistic regression. A ROC curve was performed with the atypical balance against the fulfilment of Liebowitz criteria. RESULTS: 18.5% of patients met the criteria for atypical depression. The presence of an atypical depression was significantly correlated with both the atypical score (r=0.42) and the atypical balance (r=0.51). The logistic regression showed that a higher score on the SAS, the absence of a somatic syndrome (ICD-10) and a lower HDRS-21 score were independent predictors of an atypical depression while age, gender and bipolarity were not. The ROC curve showed that an atypical balance of 29% was the optimal threshold for the diagnosis of atypical depression (sensitivity=0.86, specificity=0.79). LIMITATION: Patients with bipolar I and II were not distinguished. CONCLUSION: Atypical depression is relatively frequent in hospitalised patients. The concurrent validity of the French version of the SAS and its structured interview, the SIGH-SAD is satisfactory.


Subject(s)
Cross-Cultural Comparison , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Language , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Seasonal Affective Disorder/diagnosis , Adult , Affective Disorders, Psychotic/classification , Affective Disorders, Psychotic/diagnosis , Affective Disorders, Psychotic/psychology , Aged , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , Depressive Disorder/classification , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , France , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/psychology , Somatoform Disorders/classification , Somatoform Disorders/diagnosis , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Translating
4.
Bipolar Disord ; 10(1 Pt 2): 144-52, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18199233

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: There are currently no accepted diagnostic criteria for bipolar depression for either research or clinical purposes. This paper aimed to develop recommendations for diagnostic criteria for bipolar I depression. METHODS: Studies on the clinical characteristics of bipolar and unipolar depression were reviewed. To identify relevant papers, literature searches using PubMed and Medline were undertaken. RESULTS: There are no pathognomonic characteristics of bipolar I depression compared to unipolar depressive disorder. There are, however, replicated findings of clinical characteristics that are more common in both bipolar I depression and unipolar depressive disorder, respectively, or which are observed in unipolar-depressed patients who 'convert' (i.e., who later develop hypo/manic symptoms) to bipolar disorder over time. The following features are more common in bipolar I depression (or in unipolar 'converters' to bipolar disorder): 'atypical' depressive features such as hypersomnia, hyperphagia, and leaden paralysis; psychomotor retardation; psychotic features, and/or pathological guilt; and lability of mood. Furthermore, bipolar-depressed patients are more likely to have an earlier age of onset of their first depressive episode, to have more prior episodes of depression, to have shorter depressive episodes, and to have a family history of bipolar disorder. The following features are more common in unipolar depressive disorder: initial insomnia/reduced sleep; appetite, and/or weight loss; normal or increased activity levels; somatic complaints; later age of onset of first depressive episode; prolonged episodes; and no family history of bipolar disorder. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than proposing a categorical diagnostic distinction between bipolar depression and major depressive disorder, we would recommend a 'probabilistic' (or likelihood) approach. While there is no 'point of rarity' between the two presentations, there is, rather, a differential likelihood of experiencing the above symptoms and signs of depression. A table outlining draft proposed operationalized criteria for such an approach is provided. The specific details of such a probabilistic approach need to be further explored. For example, to be useful, any diagnostic innovation should inform treatment choices.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Models, Statistical , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Anxiety Disorders/classification , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major/classification , Depressive Disorder, Major/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/diagnosis
5.
Bipolar Disord ; 10(1 Pt 2): 163-78, 2008 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18199235

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: As a commitment to the International Society for Bipolar Disorders (ISBD), a Task Force was developed to investigate the diagnostic value of bipolar II disorder. METHODS: Task Force members worked jointly reviewing all relevant literature (original articles, reviews, letters, book chapters and congress presentations) that included 'bipolar II disorder' and/or 'hypomania' as key words. RESULTS: Bipolar II disorder appears to be a reasonably valid and reliable diagnostic category yet often underdiagnosed or misdiagnosed as unipolar disorder or personality disorder. Moreover, it is officially recognized as a mental disorder in DSM-IV-TR but not in ICD-10, and many clinicians still regard it as a milder form of manic-depressive illness, despite data supporting high morbidity and mortality rates. In fact, bipolar II may be the most prevalent bipolar phenotype, although current diagnostic boundaries are seen as quite restrictive concerning the required duration for hypomania (4 days), the exclusion of hypomanic episodes potentially triggered by antidepressants and other substances, and the negligence of hypomanic mixed states. The course of bipolar II disorder is characterized by depressive predominant polarity, and its treatment is still controversial and poorly evidence-based. CONCLUSIONS: Bipolar II disorder is supported as a distinct category within mood disorders, but the definition and boundaries deserve a greater clarification in the DSM-V and ICD-11.


Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Societies, Medical , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder/classification , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , Humans , International Classification of Diseases , Lithium Carbonate/therapeutic use , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/diagnosis , Seasonal Affective Disorder/drug therapy , Seasonal Affective Disorder/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Affect Disord ; 85(3): 267-73, 2005 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15780696

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although there have been numerous reports in personality of mood disorders, there have been few reports in regard with personality of winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD). Furthermore, no reports have been published concerning summer SAD personality characteristics. Thus, this study was conducted to assess the personality of winter and summer SAD using Tri-dimensional Personality Questionnaire (TPQ) that have been used in a variety of mental disorders. METHODS: A total of 6135 Japanese were evaluated with TPQ, the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ) and the Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS). Winter, summer and non-SAD groups were classified by SPAQ. We compared the difference of personality trait among these three groups in consideration of gender, age and SDS score influence. RESULTS: Winter SAD demonstrated higher "Novelty Seeking" and "Harm Avoidance"; summer SAD showed higher "Harm Avoidance" than the non-SAD group. "Harm Avoidance" in both SAD groups was re-analyzed using SDS score as a covariate, and "Novelty Seeking" in winter SAD using age as a covariate. As a result, the significance of high "Novelty Seeking" and high "Harm Avoidance" in winter SAD was excluded. However, "Harm Avoidance" remained the significant difference between summer and non-SAD. LIMITATION: SAD was diagnosed only by SPAQ and not by interview. The state-dependency of "Harm Avoidance" was not confirmed in identical patients over lapse of time. CONCLUSION: Patients with winter SAD have high "Harm Avoidance" dependent on the depressive state that is in accordance with non-seasonal depression. Patients with summer SAD have high "Harm Avoidance" possibly independent from the depressive state.


Subject(s)
Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Seasonal Affective Disorder/diagnosis , Temperament , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Arousal , Exploratory Behavior , Female , Harm Reduction , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Motivation , Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Reward , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/psychology , Seasons , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
9.
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol ; 14(4): 347-51, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15163447

ABSTRACT

Bright light therapy (BLT) has been proposed as treatment of choice for seasonal affective disorder (SAD). However, conventional antidepressants have also been found to be effective in this condition. We examined the psychopharmacologic medication in a clinical sample of 553 SAD patients, who had been treated with BLT, to assess the importance of drug treatment and to critically question the effectiveness of BLT. Forty-nine percent of our patients received psychopharmacologic treatment and about one third (35.4%) was treated with antidepressants, suggesting that BLT does not suffice as only antidepressant regimen for all SAD patients. Furthermore, our results show that only few patients with bipolar affective disorder were willing to accept long-term medication. Opposed to treatment guidelines, patients with several depressive episodes did not receive antidepressant maintenance medication or mood stabilizers more often than patients with only a few episodes.


Subject(s)
Phototherapy/methods , Seasonal Affective Disorder/therapy , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Chi-Square Distribution , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification
10.
Biol Psychiatry ; 54(7): 682-6, 2003 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14512207

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Heterotrimeric G proteins play a pivotal role in the intracellular transduction of many transmitter-receptor interactions. Alterations in signal transduction and in G protein concentrations have been reported in seasonal and nonseasonal affective disorder. A single-nucleotide polymorphism (C825T) in the G protein beta3-subunit gene has been shown to influence intracellular response to G protein-coupled stimuli, and the T-allele of this polymorphism has been associated with hypertension and major depression. METHODS: We genotyped deoxyribonucleic acid from peripheral mononuclear cells of 172 patients with seasonal affective disorder, winter type (SAD), and 143 healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Patients with SAD were significantly more likely to be either homo- or heterozygous for the G(beta)3 T-allele when compared with healthy control subjects (p =.001), and they displayed a higher frequency of the G(beta)3 C825T T-allele (p =.021). The polymorphism was not associated with seasonality, which is the tendency to experience variations in mood and behavior with changing of the seasons. CONCLUSIONS: The G(beta)3 C825T polymorphism was associated with SAD in our study sample. This finding strengthens the evidence for the involvement of G protein-coupled signal transduction in the pathogenesis of affective disorder.


Subject(s)
Heterotrimeric GTP-Binding Proteins/genetics , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Seasonal Affective Disorder/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Alleles , Chi-Square Distribution , Cysteine/genetics , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Threonine/genetics
12.
J Health Soc Behav ; 42(3): 221-34, 2001 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11668771

ABSTRACT

This essay considers the dual roles occupied by the sociologist of mental health. These roles involve the articulation of social causation in the study of mental health outside of the discipline, coupled with the articulation within the discipline of the importance of mental health in the study of sociology. I consider these roles both through examples and speculation, emphasizing the unique combination of conceptual and methodological tools that define the intellectual terrain of this area of sociology. The advantage of this dual role--of looking outward while also looking inward--is that we are able to draw from the essential developments and innovations from one source and "move" these insights toward the other. The difficulties of this position are also clear: As an area, we may be structurally marginal from both perspectives, at the same time that we offer considerable analytic power that could significantly impact the direction of research involving mental health in both realms.


Subject(s)
Mental Health , Sociology , Causality , Humans , Psychology, Social , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/physiopathology
13.
J Affect Disord ; 63(1-3): 123-32, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11246088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In DSM-IV, winter seasonal affective disorder (SAD) is classified as a seasonal pattern of recurrent major depressive episodes in winter with full remission of symptoms in summer. However, other groups with "winter depression" have been identified, including patients with incomplete summer remission (ISR) and subsyndromal SAD (sub-SAD, winter depressive symptoms that do not meet criteria for major depression). In this study, we compare the clinical characteristics of these three seasonal groups and their response to light therapy. METHOD: 558 patients assessed at a specialized SAD Clinic were diagnosed using DSM-III-R or DSM-IV criteria. Clinical information was recorded using a checklist at index assessment. A subset of patients (N=192) were treated with an open, 2 week trial of light therapy using a 10000 lux fluorescent light box for 30 min per day in the early morning. Patients were assessed before and after treatment with the 29 item modified Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and clinical response was defined as greater than 50% improvement in scores. RESULTS: The rates of some melancholic symptoms, anxiety, panic, suicidal ideation, and family history of mood disorder were lowest in the sub-SAD group. The clinical response rates to light therapy were highest in the sub-SAD group (N=32, 78%), intermediate in the SAD group (N=113, 66%), and lowest in the ISR group (N=47, 51%). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study of patients seen in a specialty clinic, although information was obtained in a standardized format. The light therapy trial had an open design so that placebo response could not be determined. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in both the patterns of clinical symptoms and the response to light therapy in these three groups with winter depression. These results are consistent with a dual vulnerability hypothesis that considers these groups to result from interaction of separate factors for seasonality and depression.


Subject(s)
Phototherapy , Seasonal Affective Disorder/psychology , Seasonal Affective Disorder/therapy , Adult , Affect , Anxiety , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Panic Disorder , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Suicide/psychology , Treatment Outcome
14.
West J Med ; 170(1): 35-40, 1999 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9926734

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to assess medical residents' knowledge of symptom criteria and subtypes of major depressive episode and their accuracy in diagnosing major depressive disorders and classifying episode severity and subtype according to criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. Thirty-five third-year internal medicine residents completed a self-administered, written instrument containing 2 open-ended questions and 21 hypothetical scenarios. The sensitivity for recognizing major depressive disorder was 64%, and the specificity was 69%. The sensitivity for classifying severity was 86% for mild, 66% for moderate, 71% for severe, and 66% for severe with psychosis. Misclassification of severity was most commonly to a less severe class. For scenarios with a diagnosable subtype of a major depressive disorder, the sensitivity for classification was 34% for atypical, 51% for catatonic, 74% for melancholic, 100% for postpartum, and 94% for seasonal depression. When asked to enumerate the criteria symptoms for depression, 80% or more of the residents listed sad mood, loss of interest, weight change, and sleep disturbances; 14 to 21 (40%-60%) listed thoughts of death and worthlessness; other criteria were listed by 7 to 11 (20%-31%). When asked to list the episode subtypes, none was listed by more than 3 (9%) residents, although 13 (37%) residents volunteered psychotic as a subtype. Residents frequently failed to recognize the presence or absence of major depressive disorder and often misclassified episode severity and subtype on scenarios. Few could spontaneously list the episode subtypes. Methods must be developed to improve the recognition and classification of major depressive episodes to better direct treatment.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency , Affect , Attitude , Body Weight , Catatonia/classification , Catatonia/diagnosis , Death , Depressive Disorder/classification , Female , Humans , Psychiatry/education , Psychotic Disorders/classification , Psychotic Disorders/diagnosis , Puerperal Disorders/classification , Puerperal Disorders/diagnosis , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/diagnosis , Self Concept , Self-Evaluation Programs , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sleep Wake Disorders/classification , Sleep Wake Disorders/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 59 Suppl 16: 5-12; discussion 40-2, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9796860

ABSTRACT

The complexity of subtyping depression and the implications that such subtyping has on treatment choices are discussed in this article. The most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) directs clinicians to classify the mood disorders in depressed patients as unipolar, bipolar, due to a general medical condition, or due to substance abuse. The focus of this article is unipolar (major depression and dysthymia) and bipolar I and II disorders with and without feature specifiers for atypical depression, seasonal affective disorder, psychotic depression, and postpartum depression. Anxious depression, which is not a DSM-IV classification, is also reviewed.


Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder/classification , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/classification , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Dysthymic Disorder/classification , Dysthymic Disorder/diagnosis , Dysthymic Disorder/drug therapy , Humans , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Phototherapy , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/diagnosis , Seasonal Affective Disorder/drug therapy , Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sleep Deprivation , Treatment Outcome
16.
J Affect Disord ; 42(2-3): 113-6, 1997 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9105952

ABSTRACT

We examined the consistency reliability of the widely used Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire (SPAQ). In total, 587 questionnaires from a random sample of the general population were analysed. The 6 items of the Seasonality Scale Index (SSI) correlated fairly well, and consequently this scale proved to have a high internal consistency (alpha = 0.82). Items from the SSI that measure seasonal variations in sleep and weight were consistent with other SPAQ scales that also measure these dimensions. Since the questionnaires analysed were from an epidemiological study, the high consistency reliability shows that the symptoms probed for by the SSI, tend to cluster in susceptible individuals in the general population.


Subject(s)
Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Seasonal Affective Disorder/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Iceland/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/epidemiology , Seasonal Affective Disorder/psychology , Seasons
18.
J Affect Disord ; 41(3): 193-9, 1996 Dec 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8988451

ABSTRACT

The SPAQ is a widely used tool for identifying possible cases of recurrent major depressive disorders with a seasonal pattern. However, its test-retest reliability, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, efficiency and predictive validity have not previously been formally assessed. Forty-seven subjects who fulfilled the DSMIIIR criteria for a major depressive disorder with a seasonal pattern were traced and re-interviewed after five to eight years. The SPAQ was found to have a positive predictive value of 48% and an efficiency of 57% in identifying cases of SAD confirmed by follow-up. The test-retest reliability was low. There was a mean difference in seasonality score between the first and second test of 3.17 +/- 4.7 (mean +/- 1 S.D.). Although the SPAQ is a rapid method of collecting information about recent seasonal variation, it has low test-retest reliability and on its own is unable to predict the seasonality of the future course of illness.


Subject(s)
Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Seasonal Affective Disorder/diagnosis , Seasons , Depressive Disorder/classification , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/psychology , England , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Psychometrics , Recurrence , Reproducibility of Results , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/psychology
19.
Compr Psychiatry ; 37(6): 375-83, 1996.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8932961

ABSTRACT

Atypical depression has been included in the DSM-IV as an episode specifier of major depressive episodes and dysthymia. This report will review evidence for the clinical validity of atypical depression using operational criteria for the validation of clinical syndromes. English language articles between 1969 and March 1996 were found using a computerized and manual reference search and were selected according to the following criteria: (1) primary research, (2) definition of atypical depression, which includes depression and not anxiety alone, and (3) relevance of data for validation of atypical depression. Studies were evaluated on Kendall's six criteria for establishing clinical validity. There are supporting data for diagnostic validity of atypical depression in the criteria of clinical description and differential treatment response, with atypical depression having a superior response to monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors compared to tricyclic antidepressants. There is still only limited support for the validity of atypical depression in the criteria of pathophysiology, points of rarity with other similar diagnoses, distinctive course and outcome, and genetics. Based on the current evidence, atypical depression is a useful diagnostic concept, particularly for predicting differential drug response, but further research is required to conclusively demonstrate its validity as a clinical syndrome.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder/classification , Manuals as Topic , Antidepressive Agents/pharmacology , Depressive Disorder/diagnosis , Depressive Disorder/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder/genetics , Depressive Disorder/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder/psychology , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Reproducibility of Results , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/psychology
20.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 184(9): 530-4, 1996 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8831642

ABSTRACT

The seasonality of depressed mood was examined in 70 men and women who spent the 1991 austral winter at three American research stations in Antarctica. Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire global seasonality scores increased significantly from late summer (February/March) to midwinter (July/August; p < .001). Only one case of seasonal affective disorder (SAD) was found during midwinter, but the prevalence of subsyndromal SAD increased significantly, from 10.5 to 28.4 per 100, during this period. Station latitude was significantly associated with SAD-specific symptoms and global Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-Seasonal Affective Disorders Version scores in midwinter and in early spring (October). The results suggest that even clinically normal individuals are likely to experience symptoms of subsyndromal SAD in high latitude environments, that these variations become more pronounced with increasing latitude, and that they can be detected through repeated administrations of instruments such as the Seasonal Pattern Assessment Questionnaire and Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-Seasonal Affective Disorders Version.


Subject(s)
Seasonal Affective Disorder/epidemiology , Adult , Antarctic Regions/epidemiology , Female , Geography , Humans , Male , Military Personnel , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Psychometrics , Seasonal Affective Disorder/classification , Seasonal Affective Disorder/diagnosis , Seasons
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...