Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
N Z Vet J ; 67(2): 105-108, 2019 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30557526

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To investigate the production responses and cost-benefit of administering a controlled-release anthelmintic capsule (CRC) to pregnant yearling ewes prior to lambing. METHODS: Yearling ewes from two commercial sheep flocks (A, n=489; B, n=248) in the North Island of New Zealand were enrolled in the study. Prior to lambing, CRC containing albendazole and abamectin were administered to half the ewes while the other half remained untreated. Ewe liveweights and body condition scores were measured prior to lambing, at weaning and, for Flock B, prior to subsequent mating. Lambs were matched to dams shortly after birth and the weight and number of lamb weaned per ewe were determined. A cost-benefit analysis was undertaken for Flock B considering the increased weight of lamb weaned per ewe, and the weight of ewes at the next mating and the benefit in terms of lambs born. RESULTS: The mean weight at weaning of treated ewes was greater for treated than untreated ewes by 2.76 (95% CI 0.64-4.88) kg in Flock A (p<0.001) and 2.35 (95% CI -0.41-5.12) kg in Flock B (p=0.003); the weight of lamb weaned per ewe was greater for treated than untreated ewes by 1.43 (95% CI -0.71 to -3.49) kg in Flock A (p=0.041) and 3.97 (95% CI 1.59-6.37) kg in Flock B (p<0.001), and ewe liveweight prior to subsequent mating was greater for treated than untreated ewes in Flock B by 4.60 (95% CI 3.6-5.6) kg (p<0.001). There was no difference in the percentage of lambs reared to weaning between treated and untreated ewes in either flock (p>0.8). The overall cost-benefit of treatment for Flock B was NZ$9.44 per treated ewe. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Pre-lambing CRC administration to yearling ewes resulted in increased ewe weaning weights and weight of lamb weaned in both the flocks studied. There was an economic benefit in the one flock where this was assessed.


Subject(s)
Albendazole/therapeutic use , Cobalt/therapeutic use , Helminthiasis, Animal/prevention & control , Ivermectin/analogs & derivatives , Selenium/therapeutic use , Sheep Diseases/prevention & control , Albendazole/administration & dosage , Albendazole/economics , Animals , Anthelmintics/economics , Anthelmintics/therapeutic use , Cobalt/administration & dosage , Cobalt/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delayed-Action Preparations , Female , Helminthiasis, Animal/economics , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Ivermectin/economics , Ivermectin/therapeutic use , New Zealand/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Selenium/administration & dosage , Selenium/economics , Sheep , Sheep Diseases/economics , Sheep Diseases/epidemiology
2.
Nutrients ; 10(2)2018 Feb 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29425127

ABSTRACT

The present study investigates consumers' acceptance of Se-biofortified apples, as well as Se health and nutrition claims that have been approved by the European Commission. Despite indications that such statements are more likely to be accepted if the carrier product itself has a healthy image, unprocessed fruits biofortified with Se have not been investigated in this context yet. Apples as the most frequently-consumed type of fresh fruit in Germany may offer the potential to improve the Se status of consumers when the produce is enriched with Se. Therefore, an online survey of 356 German adults was conducted to analyze different aspects that could affect the perception of and preference for the proposed product concept by consumers. The findings indicate a moderate acceptance of Se-biofortified apples, as well as of Se health and nutrition claims among the participants. Additional information about beneficial health effects of Se had a significant impact on consumer acceptance. People who regularly eat convenience food and prefer to buy apples at supermarkets were particularly attracted by the product idea. In conclusion, the results of the study indicate good prospects for a successful introduction of Se-rich apples in the German food market, if the produce is advertised with approved health and nutrition claims.


Subject(s)
Biofortification , Consumer Behavior , Food Preferences , Fruit , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Promotion , Malus , Adult , Consumer Behavior/economics , Diet, Healthy/economics , Diet, Healthy/ethnology , Female , Focus Groups , Food Labeling , Food Preferences/ethnology , Fruit/chemistry , Fruit/economics , Functional Food/analysis , Functional Food/economics , Germany , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Humans , Internet , Male , Malus/chemistry , Nutrition Surveys , Nutritive Value , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Qualitative Research , Selenium/administration & dosage , Selenium/analysis , Selenium/economics , Selenium/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...