Testicular cancer follow-up costs in Germany from 2000 to 2015.

PURPOSE: Advances in testicular cancer screening and therapy increased 10-year survival to 97% despite a rising incidence; eventually expanding the population of survivors requiring follow-up. We analyzed 10-year follow-up costs after testicular cancer treatment in Germany during 2000, 2008, and 2015. METHODS: Testicular cancer follow-up guidelines were extracted from the European Association of Urology. Per patient costs were estimated with a micro-costing approach considering direct and indirect medical expenses derived from expert interviews, literature research, and official scales of tariffs. Three perspectives covering costs for patients, providers, and insurers were included to estimate societal costs. Cost progression was compared across cancer histology, stage, stakeholders, resource use, and follow-up years. RESULTS: Mean 10-year follow-up costs per patient for stage I seminomatous germ-cell tumors (SGCT) on surveillance declined from EUR 11,995 in 2000 to EUR 4,430 in 2015 (p < 0.001). Advanced SGCT spending shrank from EUR 13,866 to EUR 9,724 (p < 0.001). In contrast, expenditure for stage II SGCT increased from EUR 7,159 to EUR 9,724 (p < 0.001). While insurers covered 32% of costs in 2000, only 13% of costs were reimbursed in 2015 (p < 0.001). 70% of SGCT follow-up resources were consumed by medical imaging (x-ray, CT, ultrasound, FDG-PET). Spending was unevenly distributed across follow-up years (years 1-2: 50%, years 3-5: 39%, years 5-10: 11%). CONCLUSIONS: The increasing prevalence of testicular cancer survivors caused German statutory insurers to cut per patient cost by up to 80% by budgeting services and decreasing reimbursement rates. The economic burden was gradually redistributed to patients and providers.

Testicular self-examination and testicular cancer: a cost-utility analysis.

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) has recommended against testicular self-examinations (TSE) or clinical examination for testicular cancer screening. However, in this recommendation there was no consideration of the significant fiscal cost of treating advanced disease versus evaluation of benign disease. In this study, a cost-utility validation for TSE was performed. The cost of treatment for an advanced-stage testicular tumor (both seminomatous and nonseminomatous) was compared to the cost of six other scenarios involving the clinical assessment of a testicular mass felt during self-examination (four benign and two early-stage malignant). Medicare reimbursements were used as an estimate for a national cost standard. The total treatment cost for an advanced-stage seminoma ($48,877) or nonseminoma ($51,592) equaled the cost of 313-330 benign office visits ($156); 180-190 office visits with scrotal ultrasound ($272); 79-83 office visits with serial scrotal ultrasounds and labs ($621); 6-7 office visits resulting in radical inguinal orchiectomy for benign pathology ($7,686) or 2-3 office visits resulting in treatment and surveillance of an early-stage testicular cancer ($17,283: seminoma, $26,190: nonseminoma). A large number of clinical evaluations based on the TSE for benign disease can be made compared to the cost of one missed advanced-stage tumor. An average of 2.4 to 1 cost benefit ratio was demonstrated for early detected testicular cancer versus advanced-stage disease.

What is the value of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma after paraaortic radiotherapy?: an analysis of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) in 675 prospectively followed patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Routine posttreatment surveillance is recommended after adjuvant radiotherapy for stage I seminoma. However, systematic studies on the value of follow-up in these patients are missing. This report addresses the efficiency of routine follow-up in stage I seminoma with particular reference to the mode of detection of relapse and the costs of posttreatment screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All follow-up investigations of a prospectively followed cohort of 675 patients with stage I seminoma treated with PA radiotherapy were analyzed with respect to the first indications of relapse, patterns of recurrence, risk factors of relapse, and cost-efficiency of the different technical examinations of the follow-up schedule over a 10-year period. RESULTS: With a median time to follow-up of 61 months, recurrence was diagnosed by symptoms or physical examination in 14 out of 26 relapsing patients. Among the technical follow-up investigations abdominopelvic imaging had the highest detection rate for relapse, while thoracic imaging and marker analysis were inefficient. Abdominal sonography had the highest cost-efficiency of all technical follow-up investigations, while computed tomography (CT) scans were responsible for approximately 60% of all costs. The authors failed to identify risk factors predictive of relapse after adjuvant irradiation. CONCLUSION: Routine technical investigations during follow-up after PA radiotherapy for stage I seminoma yield only a low detection rate of relapse from cancer. The data presented here provide no evidence for the value of technical follow-up beyond the 3rd year after treatment or routine screening of the chest. Thorough physical examination of the patients should be encouraged. Patients should be informed about potential symptoms indicative of recurrence. Restrictive use of abdominopelvic CT scans will reduce exposure to ionizing radiation and considerably increase the cost-efficiency of follow-up.

A comprehensive systematic review of testicular germ cell tumor surveillance.

BACKGROUND: Testicular cancer is the most common malignancy in men aged 15-34, and its incidence has been increasing over the past half-century. Survival for stage I testis cancer approaches 100% regardless of management strategy which is often dictated by other factors such as perceived morbidity. Advances in treatment have attempted to decrease morbidity and surveillance is thought to achieve this goal. METHODS: An English language literature search of MEDLINE from 1966 to December 2005 and CINAHL from 1982 to December 2005 was conducted using a broad search strategy. Comparative and descriptive original articles on outcomes of seminoma or NSGCT surveillance would be deemed eligible and review articles containing no original data were omitted. One hundred and thirty-eight articles were selected for formal review, during which a database was compiled that documented the first author, publication year, tumor histologic type, study purpose or topic(s), methodology, sample size, median follow-up, and relevant results. RESULTS: Most evidence for the efficacy of surveillance is from descriptive series or non-experimental comparative studies. Relapse occurs in approximately 28% and 17% of surveillance patients in NSGCT and seminoma, respectively, and cause-specific survival is approximately 98% and 100%, respectively. Compliance with surveillance ranges from poor to adequate, however there is no evidence that compliance impacts clinical outcome. Cost analyses have yielded inconsistent results when comparing treatment modalities. There is scant literature on quality of life and psychosocial issues and results are inconsistent. Active surveillance appears to be appropriate and perhaps optimal first line management of clinical stage I seminoma and non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Further quantitative and qualitative research is warranted to deepen understanding of these issues that may impact treatment decision-making.

Long term outcome and cost in the management of stage I testicular seminoma.

PURPOSE: To validate the use of surveillance as an alternative to adjuvant RT in clinical stage I seminoma, we analyzed our experience with the two approaches in terms of long term outcome and cost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1981 and December 1994, 471 patients with stage I testicular seminoma were treated at our institution. Of these, 245 patients received post-operative RT (25 Gy) to the retroperitoneal lymph nodes, and 226 have been managed with surveillance following orchidectomy. Two patients were included in this series twice; both had RT previously for seminoma, were placed on surveillance for a contralateral seminoma and were analyzed for outcome of both primary tumors. The costs associated with both approaches were estimated in 1994 Canadian dollars (C$). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 7.7 years in the surveillance patients, and 9.7 years in the adjuvant RT cohort, the 5 year actuarial survival for all patients was 97% and the cause-specific survival (CSS) was 99.8%. Of the 226 patients on surveillance 37 patients have relapsed to date; five of those developed a second relapse. One patient has died of disease. Of the 245 patients treated with adjuvant RT, 14 patients have relapsed and none had a second relapse. The CSS was 100%. Thirteen patients on surveillance (5.7%) and 10 patients treated with post-operative RT (4.1%) have received chemotherapy as part of their management. One hundred and eighty-nine patients on surveillance have received no post-orchidectomy treatment to date. Surveillance was more expensive with an average additional cost per patient per year of Can$2620 over 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: Both adjuvant RT and surveillance give excellent results in stage I seminoma. The documented increased risk of second malignant tumors following RT must be taken into account when considering the additional cost of surveillance. The routine use of post-operative RT in stage I seminoma should be reconsidered and a surveillance program offered to all patients as an alternative management option.

Cost-effectiveness of posttreatment surveillance after radiation therapy for early stage seminoma.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of posttreatment surveillance after radiation therapy for early stage seminoma. METHODS: From 1988-1995, 47 patients with Stage I, and 11 patients with Stage II seminoma (based on the Royal Marsden staging system) received paraaortic and pelvic lymph node radiation after radical orchiectomy. Patient records were reviewed and patients surveyed to determine the tests ordered for posttreatment surveillance. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 55 months, there were 2 recurrences among the 58 patients. Eight-year actuarial disease free survival was 93%, with 100% overall survival. Information concerning follow-up screening was available for 56 patients. The follow-up tests ordered included 842 physical examinations, 815 chest X-rays, 839 serum markers, 250 computerized tomography scans, and 112 abdominal plain films. The total cost of these examinations according to 1996 private sector charges and 1996 Medicare reimbursement rates, respectively, was $602,673.01 (average $10,762.02 per patient) and $282,746.52 (average $5049.05 per patient). The two patients who experienced recurrence were diagnosed independently of their posttreatment screening program. One patient recurred 7.5 months after his original diagnosis with an isolated spinal cord compression. The second patient had a mediastinum recurrence > 6 years after treatment. At last follow-up, both patients were disease free after salvage treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with early stage seminoma treated with orchiectomy and radiation have excellent disease free survival rates. The cost of the surveillance program studied does not appear to be justifiable.

Postsurgical policy in stage I testicular seminoma: cost and benefit of prophylactic irradiation in a long-term experience.

The definitive cure rate for clinical stage 1 testicular seminoma is very close to 100%, and prophylactic irradiation of the regional lymph nodes is associated with a low morbidity. Nevertheless, in recent years a "wait-and-see" policy has been proposed by some researchers. We analysed the cost/benefit ratio of radiotherapy (RT) by review of the case histories of 299 patients treated at the Department of Radiotherapy of the Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori in Milan from January 1968 to December 1989. The 5-year overall survival was 99% (97.5% at 10 years), while the 10-year disease-free survival was 96%. The recurrence rate was 2.3%, but no patient relapsed in the irradiated areas. Acute toxicity was very moderate with only 4 (1.3%) serious radiation sequelae occurring 6 to 27 years after treatment. However, 9 second malignancies (3%) were observed. Lastly, we have calculated the costs for our National Health Service comparing surveillance policy and prophylactic irradiation.

Adjuvant radiation versus observation: a cost analysis of alternate management schemes in early-stage testicular seminoma.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare costs of adjuvant radiation versus observation in the management of early-stage testicular seminoma after inguinal orchiectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A line-by-line inspection of the charges generated during a course of adjuvant pelvic and paraaortic radiotherapy and of three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and platinum salvage chemotherapy was performed for five patients who received irradiation and five patients who received salvage chemotherapy. The average charge for either treatment was then calculated. Only those charges directly associated with the diagnosis of seminoma were included in the analysis. Follow-up charges were also generated from the patients' billing records. The optimum follow-up regimen for either management option was derived from a synthesis of the international literature. A 5% rate of failure was assumed if adjuvant irradiation was administered, and a 15% rate of failure was assumed if observation was the option chosen. Charges were truncated at 5 years. RESULTS: The total charge generated over 5 years based on following a policy of observation is $27,223 per patient versus $19,557 if the option of adjuvant irradiation in chosen. Using University of Wisconsin institutional reimbursement rates, the estimated costs were $20,487 and $14,722 for the option of observation and adjuvant radiation, respectively. The cost equivalence point between the two options occurs at 2.5 years, when the initial cost of adjuvant radiotherapy is matched by the cost generated during the period of observation. The maximum cost difference is achieved by 5 years. CONCLUSION: Following a policy of observation postorchiectomy for early-stage testicular seminoma generates 39% more medical costs per patient over a 5-year follow-up period than does following the standard policy of adjuvant irradiation to the pelvic and paraaortic regions, with no reported difference in outcome.