Interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever.

BACKGROUND: Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), a hereditary auto-inflammatory disease, mainly affects ethnic groups living in the Mediterranean region. Early studies reported colchicine may potentially prevent FMF attacks. For people who are colchicine-resistant or intolerant, drugs such as anakinra, rilonacept, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab or adalimumab might be beneficial. This is an update of the review last published in 2018. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in people with FMF. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and four Chinese databases on in August 2021. We searched clinical trials registries and references listed in relevant reports. The last search was 17 August 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people with FMF, comparing active interventions (including colchicine, anakinra, rilonacept, canakinumab, etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab, thalidomide, tocilizumab, interferon-α and ImmunoGuard (herbal dietary supplement)) with placebo or no treatment, or comparing active drugs to each other. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methodology. We assessed certainty of the evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: We included 10 RCTs with 312 participants (aged three to 53 years), including five parallel and five cross-over designed studies. Six studies used oral colchicine, one used oral ImmunoGuard, and the remaining three used rilonacept, anakinra or canakinumab as a subcutaneous injection. The duration of each study arm ranged from one to eight months. There were inadequacies in the design of the four older colchicine studies and the two studies comparing a single to a divided dose of colchicine. However, the four studies of ImmunoGuard, rilonacept, anakinra and canakinumab were generally well-designed.  We aimed to report on the number of participants experiencing an attack, the timing of attacks, the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis, adverse drug reactions and the response of a number of biochemical markers from the acute phase of an attack; but no study reported on the prevention of amyloid A amyloidosis. Colchicine (oral) versus placebo After three months, colchicine 0.6 mg three times daily may reduce the number of people experiencing attacks (risk ratio (RR) 0.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05 to 0.95; 1 study, 10 participants; low-certainty evidence). One study (20 participants) of colchicine 0.5 mg twice daily showed there may be no difference in the number of participants experiencing attacks at two months (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.23; low-certainty evidence). There may be no differences in the duration of attacks (narrative summary; very low-certainty evidence), or in the number of days between attacks: (narrative summary; very low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse drug reactions, one study reported loose stools and frequent bowel movements and a second reported diarrhea (narrative summary; both very low-certainty evidence). There were no data on acute-phase response. Rilonacept versus placebo There is probably no difference in the number of people experiencing attacks at three months (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.26; moderate-certainty evidence).  There may be no differences in the duration of attacks (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence) or in the number of days between attacks (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence). Regarding adverse drug reactions, the rilonacept study reported there may be no differences in gastrointestinal symptoms, hypertension, headache, respiratory tract infections, injection site reactions and herpes, compared to placebo (narrative summary; low-certainty evidence). The study narratively reported there may be no differences in acute-phase response indicators after three months (low-certainty evidence). ImmunoGuard versus placebo The ImmunoGuard study observed there are probably no differences in adverse effects (moderate-certainty evidence) or in acute-phase response indicators after one month of treatment (moderate-certainty evidence). No data were reported for the number of people experiencing an attack, duration of attacks or days between attacks. Anakinra versus placebo A study of anakinra given to 25 colchicine-resistant participants found there is probably no difference in the number of participants experiencing an attack at four months (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.07; moderate-certainty evidence).  There were no data for duration of attacks or days between attacks. There are probably no differences between anakinra and placebo with regards to injection site reaction, headache, presyncope, dyspnea and itching (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, anakinra probably reduced C-reactive protein (CRP) after four months (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). Canakinumab versus placebo Canakinumab probably reduces the number of participants experiencing an attack at 16 weeks (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.65; 1 study, 63 colchicine-resistant participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data for the duration of attacks or days between attacks. The included study reported the number of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years was probably 42.7 with canakinumab versus 97.4 with placebo among people with colchicine-resistant FMF (moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, canakinumab probably caused a higher proportion of participants to have a CRP level of 10 mg/L or less compared to placebo (68% with canakinumab versus 6% with placebo; 1 study, 63 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Colchicine single dose versus divided dose There is probably no difference in the duration of attacks at three months (MD -0.04 hours, 95% CI -10.91 to 10.83) or six months (MD 2.80 hours, 95% CI -5.39 to 10.99; moderate-certainty evidence). There were no data for the number of participants experiencing an attack or days between attacks. There is probably no difference in adverse events (including anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, vomiting and elevated liver enzymes) between groups (narrative summary; moderate-certainty evidence). For acute-phase response, there may be no evidence of a difference between groups (narrative summary; low- to moderate-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There were limited RCTs assessing interventions for people with FMF. Based on the evidence, three times daily colchicine may reduce the number of people experiencing attacks, colchicine single dose and divided dose may not be different for children with FMF, canakinumab probably reduces the number of people experiencing attacks, and anakinra or canakinumab probably reduce CRP in colchicine-resistant participants; however, only a few RCTs contributed data for analysis. Further RCTs examining active interventions, not only colchicine, are necessary before a comprehensive conclusion regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions for reducing inflammation in FMF can be drawn.

Ação da proteína amiloide sérica A em melanomas / Activity of serum amyloid A protein in melanomas

Concentrações séricas basais da proteína amiloide sérica A (SAA) estão significativamente aumentadas em pacientes com câncer e alguns autores sugerem uma relação causal. Trabalho anterior do grupo mostrou que a SAA induz a proliferação de duas linhagens de glioblastoma humano e afeta os processos de invasividade in vitro, sustentando um papel pró-tumoral para esta proteína. Com base nesse trabalho, investigamos a abrangência dos efeitos de SAA para outro tipo de célula tumoral e para isso escolhemos um painel de linhagens de melanoma humano e uma linhagem primária obtida a partir de aspirado de linfonodo de paciente com melanoma, por nós isolada. Observamos que apesar da célula precursora de melanomas, isto é, melanócito, não produzir SAA, todas as linhagens de melanoma produziram a proteína e expressaram alguns dos seus receptores. Além disso, quando estas células foram estimuladas com SAA houve uma inibição da proliferação em tempos curtos de exposição (48 horas) e efeitos citotóxicos após um tempo maior (7 dias). A SAA também afetou processos de invasividade e a produção das citocinas IL-6, IL-8 e TNF-α. Aos avaliarmos o efeito da SAA na interação das células de melanoma com células do sistema imune, vimos que a SAA ativou uma resposta imune anti-tumoral aumentando a expressão de moléculas co-estumolatórias, como CD69 e HLA-DR, e sua função citotóxica. Ainda, vimos que a produção de TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-1ß e IL-8 estimuladas por SAA podem contribuir com os efeitos desta. De forma geral estes resultados nos levam a crer que a SAA tem atividade anti-tumoral em melanomas. Finalizando, com base na importância do desenvolvimento da resistência às terapias atuais para o melanoma, observamos que em células resistentes ao PLX4032, um inibidor de BRAF, os efeitos imunomodulatórios induzidos pela SAA estão abolidos, possivelmente identificando um novo componente da resistência

Basal serum concentrations of the protein serum amyloid A are significantly increased in cancer patients and some authors suggest a causal relationship. Previous work of our research group showed that SAA induces proliferation of two cell lines of human glioblastoma and affects invasiveness processes in vitro, supporting a pro-tumor role for this protein. Based on this work, we investigated the extent of SAA effects to another type of tumor cell and we chose a panel of human melanoma cell lines and primary line obtained from a patient with melanoma by lymph node aspirate. Melanoma cells were isolated by us. We observed that while the precursor cells of melanoma, melanocytes, do not produce SAA, all melanoma cell lines expressed the protein and produced some of their receptors. Moreover, when these cells were stimulated with SAA there was an inhibition of proliferation in short exposure times (48 hours) and cytotoxic effects after a longer period (7 days). SAA also affected invasive procedures and the production of the cytokines IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α. To evaluate the SAA effect in the interaction of melanoma cells with immune system cells, we found that SAA activated an anti-tumor immune response by increasing the expression of co-estimulatory molecules such as CD69 and HLA-DR, and their cytotoxic function. Furthermore, we found that the production of TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-1ß and IL-8 stimulated by SAA can contribute to this effect. In general these results lead us to believe that the SAA has anti-tumor activity in melanomas. Finally, based on the importance of the resistance development to current therapies for melanoma we observed that in cells resistant to PLX4032, a BRAF inhibitor, the immunomodulatory effects induced by SAA are abolished, possibly identifying a new resistance component

Serum amyloid A promotes invasion of feline mammary carcinoma cells.

The serum amyloid A (SAA) concentration is higher in mammary tumors with metastases in both humans and animals. In the present study, the direct effects of recombinant feline SAA (rfSAA) protein on invasiveness of feline mammary carcinoma cells were evaluated. As an indicator of invasiveness, matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) expression was investigated in 4 feline mammary carcinoma cell lines of different origins. In 3 of 4 cell lines, MMP-9 expression was significantly increased by rfSAA stimulation. The invasive capacities of feline mammary carcinoma cells were also stimulated by rfSAA. The findings of this study have identified a novel role for SAA in mammary tumorigenesis and suggest that therapeutic strategies targeting SAA may provide new alternatives in treating tumor invasion and metastasis.

The acute-phase protein serum amyloid A induces endothelial dysfunction that is inhibited by high-density lipoprotein.

The acute-phase protein serum amyloid A (SAA) is elevated during inflammation and may be deposited in atheroma where it promotes atherosclerosis. We investigated the proatherogenic effects of SAA on the vascular endothelium and their regulation by high-density lipoprotein (HDL). Exposure of human aortic endothelial cells (HAEC) to SAA (0.25-25µg/ml) decreased nitric oxide ((•)NO) synthesis/bioavailability, although the endothelial NO synthase monomer-to-dimer ratio was unaffected. SAA (10µg/ml) stimulated a Ca(2+) influx linked to apocynin-sensitive superoxide radical anion (O(2)(•-)) production. Gene expression for arginase-1, nuclear factor κB (NF-κB), interleukin-8, and tissue factor (TF) increased within 4h of SAA stimulation. Enzymatically active Arg-1/2 was detected in HAEC cultured with SAA for 24h. Therefore, in addition to modulating (•)NO bioavailability by stimulating O(2)(•-) production in the endothelium, SAA modulated vascular l-Arg bioavailability. SAA also diminished relaxation of preconstricted aortic rings induced by acetylcholine, and added superoxide dismutase restored the vascular response. Preincubation of HAEC with HDL (100 or 200, but not 50, µg/ml) before (not after) SAA treatment ameliorated the Ca(2+) influx and O(2)(•-) production; decreased TF, NF-κB, and Arg-1 gene expression; and preserved overall vascular function. Thus, SAA may promote endothelial dysfunction by modulating (•)NO and l-Arg bioavailability, and HDL pretreatment may be protective. The relative HDL to SAA concentrations may regulate the proatherogenic properties of SAA on the vascular endothelium.

Effects of l-carnitine supplement on serum amyloid A and vascular inflammation markers in hemodialysis patients: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: We studied the effects of l-carnitine supplement on serum amyloid A (SAA), a systemic inflammation marker, and vascular inflammation markers in hemodialysis patients. DESIGN: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: The study was performed in Soodeh Hemodialysis Center in Islamshahr, Iran. PATIENTS: We included 36 hemodialysis patients (15 men and 21 women). INTERVENTION: The patients on hemodialysis were randomly assigned to either a carnitine or a placebo group. Patients in the carnitine group received 1,000 mg/day oral l-carnitine for 12 weeks, whereas patients in the placebo group received a corresponding placebo during the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum free carnitine, SAA, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule type 1, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule type 2, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule type 1, sE-selectin, sP-selectin, and oxidized low-density lipoprotein were measured at baseline and at the end of week 12 of the study. RESULTS: Mean serum free carnitine concentration increased significantly to 150% of baseline in the carnitine group at the end of week 12 (P < .001), whereas serum SAA showed a significant 32% decrease (P < .001). No significant changes were observed in the serum concentrations of free carnitine and SAA in the placebo group during the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean changes in serum soluble intercellular adhesion molecule type 1, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule type 2, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule type 1, sE-selectin, sP-selectin, and oxidized low-density lipoprotein concentrations. CONCLUSION: The study indicates that l-carnitine supplement reduces serum SAA, which is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in hemodialysis patients, but has no effect on vascular inflammation markers.