Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Brachytherapy ; 17(3): 517-523, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29496423

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate quality-of-life changes up to 10 years following three different radiotherapy concepts. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the years 2000-2003, 295 patients were treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; n = 135; 70.2 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions), low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT with I-125; n = 94; 145 Gy), and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT with Ir-192; n = 66; 18 Gy in two fractions using 4-6 needles) as a boost to EBRT (50.4 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions). Quality of life was assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite at median time of 2, 6, and 10 years after treatment. RESULTS: The urinary function score 2 years after EBRT (mean 93 points) was significantly higher in comparison to HDR-BT + EBRT (80 points, higher doses to the urethra relevant) and LDR-BT (88 points). After 10 years, only HDR-BT + EBRT (75 points) remained worse (LDR-BT 92 points; EBRT 91 points). Urinary incontinence score decreased from 83 to 76 points in the HDR-BT + EBRT group. No significant differences or changes resulted in the bowel domain. The mean sexual function score (i.e., sexuality score) was significantly higher after LDR-BT versus HDR-BT + EBRT and EBRT (30 vs. 19 and 24 points after 2 years and 25 vs. 13 and 15 points after 10 years, respectively)-a lower patient age and a lower percentage with hormonal treatment need to be considered. CONCLUSION: Apart from decreasing sexual function for all patients, decreasing urinary scores were found in the HDR-BT + EBRT group predominantly as a result of increasing incontinence. This study demonstrates the need for optimum BT treatment planning.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Iodine Radioisotopes , Iridium Radioisotopes , Male , Middle Aged , Radiotherapy Dosage , Sexuality/radiation effects , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence/epidemiology , Urinary Incontinence/etiology , Urination/radiation effects
2.
Brachytherapy ; 17(3): 524-529, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29482918

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine the acute toxicity and effect on health-related quality of life of a two-fraction regimen of high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer were treated with HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy in two implants of 13.5 Gy spaced 7-14 days apart. Patients completed International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaires at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, and 24 months after brachytherapy. Proportion of patients in each IPSS category (mild = 0-7, moderate = 8-18, severe = 19+) was evaluated at each of the intervals above. Paired t tests with baseline values were done for IPSS and EPIC scores. RESULTS: Thirty patients were accrued to the study. Median prostate-specific antigen was 8,7 (range 4.1-17.5). T stages were T1c = 65%, T2a = 21%, and T2b = 14%. Twenty-seven percent of patients had a Gleason score of 6 and 73% had a Gleason score of 7. IPSS categories at baseline, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were mild (81%, 43%, 58%, 62%, 76%, 64%), moderate (19%, 32%, 29%, 30%, 20%, 29%), and severe (0%, 25%, 13%, 7%, 4%, 6%), respectively. There was a significant decrease in EPIC sexual summary scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of 0 points (p < 0.001), 17 points (p = 0.01), 18 points (p = 0.02), and 17 points (p = 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first report of this cohort of patients treated with two-fraction HDR monotherapy. This regimen shows rates of toxicity and health-related quality of life that appear acceptable as compared to other treatment modalities. These results are also comparable with other reports with similar treatment regimens.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Aged , Brachytherapy/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrointestinal Diseases/epidemiology , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Radiation Dosage , Sexuality/radiation effects , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 87(5): 939-45, 2013 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24119836

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the early and late health-related quality of life (QOL) outcomes among prostate cancer patients following stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patient self-reported QOL was prospectively measured among 864 patients from phase 2 clinical trials of SBRT for localized prostate cancer. Data from the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) instrument were obtained at baseline and at regular intervals up to 6 years. SBRT delivered a median dose of 36.25 Gy in 4 or 5 fractions. A short course of androgen deprivation therapy was given to 14% of patients. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3 years and 194 patients remained evaluable at 5 years. A transient decline in the urinary and bowel domains was observed within the first 3 months after SBRT which returned to baseline status or better within 6 months and remained so beyond 5 years. The same pattern was observed among patients with good versus poor baseline function and was independent of the degree of early toxicities. Sexual QOL decline was predominantly observed within the first 9 months, a pattern not altered by the use of androgen deprivation therapy or patient age. CONCLUSION: Long-term outcome demonstrates that prostate SBRT is well tolerated and has little lasting impact on health-related QOL. A transient and modest decline in urinary and bowel QOL during the first few months after SBRT quickly recovers to baseline levels. With a large number of patients evaluable up to 5 years following SBRT, it is unlikely that unexpected late adverse effects will manifest themselves.


Subject(s)
Health Status , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Quality of Life , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Aged , Benchmarking , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Dosage , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/methods , Recovery of Function , Rectum/radiation effects , Self Report , Sexuality/radiation effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Bladder/radiation effects
4.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 87(5): 946-53, 2013 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24139077

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To report quality of life (QOL)/toxicity in men treated with proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer and to compare outcomes between passively scattered proton therapy (PSPT) and spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Men with localized prostate cancer enrolled on a prospective QOL protocol with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up were reviewed. Comparative groups were defined by technique (PSPT vs SSPT). Patients completed Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite questionnaires at baseline and every 3-6 months after proton beam therapy. Clinically meaningful differences in QOL were defined as ≥0.5 × baseline standard deviation. The cumulative incidence of modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) or genitourinary (GU) toxicity and argon plasma coagulation were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 226 men received PSPT, and 65 received SSPT. Both PSPT and SSPT resulted in statistically significant changes in sexual, urinary, and bowel Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite summary scores. Only bowel summary, function, and bother resulted in clinically meaningful decrements beyond treatment completion. The decrement in bowel QOL persisted through 24-month follow-up. Cumulative grade ≥2 GU and GI toxicity at 24 months were 13.4% and 9.6%, respectively. There was 1 grade 3 GI toxicity (PSPT group) and no other grade ≥3 GI or GU toxicity. Argon plasma coagulation application was infrequent (PSPT 4.4% vs SSPT 1.5%; P=.21). No statistically significant differences were appreciated between PSPT and SSPT regarding toxicity or QOL. CONCLUSION: Both PSPT and SSPT confer low rates of grade ≥2 GI or GU toxicity, with preservation of meaningful sexual and urinary QOL at 24 months. A modest, yet clinically meaningful, decrement in bowel QOL was seen throughout follow-up. No toxicity or QOL differences between PSPT and SSPT were identified. Long-term comparative results in a larger patient cohort are warranted.


Subject(s)
Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Scattering, Radiation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Intestines/radiation effects , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prostate/radiation effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Proton Therapy/methods , Seminal Vesicles/radiation effects , Sexuality/radiation effects , Urinary Bladder/radiation effects , Urination Disorders/etiology
5.
Soc Sci Med ; 76(1): 188-96, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23153544

ABSTRACT

Pelvic radiotherapy creates physical effects and psychological responses that negatively affect the sexual health of women and couples, yet these sexual consequences are not frequently researched or clinically assessed. This focused ethnographic study explored factors that influence the clinical assessment of treatment-induced female sexual difficulties after pelvic radiotherapy within routine medical follow-up. Participant observation of follow-up clinics (n = 69) and in-depth interviews with 24 women, 5 partners and 20 health professionals were undertaken at two cancer centres in the South East of England from 2005 to 2006. Thematic analysis of interview transcripts resulted in five emergent themes, two of which are explored in detail within this paper. A social constructionist approach to human sexuality was used to explore representations of female sexuality in oncology follow-up constructed by clinicians, women and their partners. Yet neither social constructionist nor biomedical (the predominant model in medical follow-up) perspectives on human sexuality provided an adequate interpretation of these study findings. This paper argues that the comprehensive study and practice of sexual rehabilitation in oncology requires a synthesis of both biomedical and social constructionist perspectives in order to capture the complex, subjective and embodied nature of the female sexual response in both health and illness.


Subject(s)
Pelvic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/rehabilitation , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/rehabilitation , Sexuality/radiation effects , Adult , Aged , England , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvic Neoplasms/psychology , Qualitative Research , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/etiology , Treatment Outcome
6.
Bone Marrow Transplant ; 47(5): 716-24, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21874054

ABSTRACT

In this paper we review evidence concerning the impact of hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) on sexuality. The aims are to determine: (1) the sexual changes experienced by patients following allogeneic or autologous HSCT, and its consequences; (2) changes in the sexual function over time and (3) the impact of physiological changes induced by intensive treatment with radiation and chemotherapy on sexual functioning. Four databases were searched for articles published between January 1995 and May 2011. A total of 14 studies were identified and analyzed. We found that (1) multiple aspects of sexuality were affected, and the impact and etiology of these sexual alterations were different between genders, and (2) recovery of sexual activity and pleasure occurred in the first 2 years after HSCT, although it appears that some survivors are more likely to experience sexual dysfunction even 5-10 years after HSCT as compared with controls; and (3) there was contradictory evidence concerning possible differences between allogeneic and autologous HSCT, although there was a significant relation between the sexual dysfunctions and the type of chemotherapy administrated as conditioning and chronic GVHD. Future prospective research in sexual dysfunction with specific reliable validated instruments and more adequate sample sizes will be required to definitively evaluate the impact of HSCT on sexuality.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/etiology , Sexuality , Adult , Body Image , Female , Graft vs Host Disease/complications , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Sex Factors , Sexuality/drug effects , Sexuality/radiation effects , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation, Autologous/adverse effects , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects
7.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 285(2): 505-14, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21769555

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess physical and psychological morbidity, sexual functioning and social and relationship satisfaction among women treated with pelvic radiotherapy. METHODS: Observational (case-control) study of 199 women: 98 submitted to pelvic radiotherapy for the treatment of uterine, rectal or anal cancers and 101 without a personal history of cancer and similar socio-demographic variables. These completed a socio-demographic and clinical questionnaire, and validated measures of psychological health (DASS: Lovibond and Lovibond in Behav Res Ther 33:353-343, 1995), sexual function (FSFI: Rosen et al. in J Sex Marital Ther 26:191-208, 2007), social support (ESSS: Ribeiro in Analise Psicologica 3:547-558, 1999) and relationship satisfaction (IMS: Hudson in The WALMYR assessment scales scoring manual 1992). RESULTS: Women submitted to pelvic irradiation reported a higher rate of adverse physical symptoms in the last month: fatigue 59 versus 25% (p < 0.001), lack of strength 42 versus 20% (p = 0.001), diarrhoea 24 versus 12% (p = 0.032), vaginal discharge 17 versus 7% (p = 0.024), skin erythema 9 versus 2% (p = 0.026). Levels of depression, anxiety and stress were higher among radiotherapy patients, but only reach statistical significance for the stress parameter (6.1 vs. 4.0, p = 0.012). Also these women reported lower scores of satisfaction with social support (57.2 vs. 62.2, p = 0.005) and sexual function (8.5 vs. 13.5, p = 0.049). No statistically significant differences occurred between the two groups regarding scores of relationship satisfaction (20.8 vs. 19.9, p = n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that pelvic radiotherapy had a negative impact on female sexuality. Thus, interventions that would help to reduce this impact need to be designed and integrated into routine clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/etiology , Sexuality/radiation effects , Uterine Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anus Neoplasms/psychology , Case-Control Studies , Diarrhea/etiology , Erythema/etiology , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Middle Aged , Muscle Weakness/etiology , Pelvis/radiation effects , Radiotherapy Dosage , Rectal Neoplasms/psychology , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/psychology , Sexuality/psychology , Social Support , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Uterine Neoplasms/psychology , Vaginal Discharge/etiology , Young Adult
8.
Maturitas ; 70(1): 42-57, 2011 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21764229

ABSTRACT

Research in the area of gynaecological cancer has increasingly examined changes to women's sexuality, with the impact of treatment on sexual wellbeing considered particularly important. The objective of this paper is to review research on gynaecological cancer and sexuality from the years 1990 to 2011. Research has documented a range of post-treatment anatomical and physical changes to women's sexual wellbeing, including changes to sexual desire, pleasure, orgasm, vaginal lubrication, genital sensitivity, arousal, and frequency of sex. Women's intrapsychic experiences of changes to sexuality include anxiety, depression, distress, and negative perceptions of sexual identity and body image. Socially constructed discourses surrounding gender and sexuality also shape women's experiences of their sexual wellbeing post-gynaecological cancer and treatment, with many women feeling a loss of womanhood and femininity with the removal of, or changes to, their reproductive organs. Finally, women's relationship context, pattern of couple communication, and partner support are associated with women's ability to cope with changes to sexuality post-gynaecological cancer. Given that sexuality is an important part of quality of life, it is important that health professionals actively communicate information to women and their partner about the effects of treatment on sexual wellbeing, in order to legitimate and normalise sexuality in this context. It is concluded that research in the area of gynaecological cancer and sexuality needs to acknowledge not only the physical/anatomical/material effects of cancer treatments, but also women's intrapsychic experiences of changes to sexuality, her relationship context, and the role of gendered discourses in shaping women's experiences of sexuality post-gynaecological cancer and treatment.


Subject(s)
Genital Neoplasms, Female/psychology , Sexuality/psychology , Body Image , Female , Femininity , Genital Neoplasms, Female/therapy , Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Interpersonal Relations , Sexuality/drug effects , Sexuality/radiation effects
11.
Semin Oncol Nurs ; 17(2): 90-100, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11383249

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To review the advances in radiation therapy for prostate cancer and the nursing care of patients with prostate cancer. DATA SOURCES: Peer-reviewed journal articles, including research studies and review articles. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation therapy is used to cure early stage prostate cancer, control locally advanced disease, and effectively palliate symptoms of metastasis. The three forms of treatment used include external beam radiation therapy, brachytherapy; and radiopharmaceutical treatments. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nursing care of patients receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer includes managing the symptoms associated with the disease and treatment, educating patients and families about self-care measures, and providing support throughout the course of the disease.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Brachytherapy/psychology , Combined Modality Therapy , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Staging , Oncology Nursing/education , Patient Compliance/psychology , Patient Education as Topic , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/psychology , Radiopharmaceuticals/pharmacokinetics , Radiopharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Conformal/psychology , Sexuality/radiation effects , Treatment Outcome
12.
Med Pediatr Oncol ; 35(1): 52-63, 2000 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10881008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Insofar as a majority of children with malignant diseases are cured, the late effects of treatment are of major importance. PROCEDURE: A retrospective study was conducted of gonadal and sexual function of 77 adult male survivors of childhood malignancies treated and cured at a single center from 1970 to 1989 and followed for a median of 13 years. The study included an interview, physical examination, sperm test, and hormonal analyses. RESULTS: One-third of the patients were treated for hematological malignancies, one-third for CNS tumors, and one-third for other malignancies. Eleven patients required androgen substitution after treatment for tumors of the pituitary-hypothalamic region or acute lymphoblastic leukemia including testicular irradiation and/or orchiectomy. In three patients the testicles were removed. The other eight had small testicles, and those providing sperm samples had azoospermia, and sexual function was disturbed in most of them. Most of the remaining 66 patients had small testicles. Normozoospermia was found in 63%, oligozoospermia in 20%, and azoospermia in 17%. Although there was a highly significant correlation between testicular volume and sperm test, 25% of patients with testicles of <10 ml had normozoospermia. Sexual function was normal in 46 patients, and they were married at a frequency comparable to the normal population. Twenty-one patients had no signs of gonadal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated for tumors in the hypothalamic-pituitary region or treated with testicular irradiation or with high doses of alkylating agents had severe gonadal and sexual dysfunction. Most of the other patients had good prospects for preserved gonadal and sexual function.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Sexuality , Testis/drug effects , Testis/radiation effects , Adolescent , Adult , Androgens/therapeutic use , Body Constitution , Gonadal Steroid Hormones/blood , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Sexuality/drug effects , Sexuality/radiation effects , Sperm Count/drug effects , Sperm Count/radiation effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survivors , Sweden , Testicular Diseases/etiology , Testicular Diseases/physiopathology , Testis/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...