Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 224(2): 219.e1-219.e15, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32798461

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Birth hospital has recently emerged as a potential key contributor to disparities in severe maternal morbidity, but investigations on its contribution to racial and ethnic differences remain limited. OBJECTIVE: We leveraged statewide data from California to examine whether birth hospital explained racial and ethnic differences in severe maternal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: This cohort study used data on all births at ≥20 weeks gestation in California (2007-2012). Severe maternal morbidity during birth hospitalization was measured using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention index of having at least 1 of the 21 diagnoses and procedures (eg, eclampsia, blood transfusion, hysterectomy). Mixed-effects logistic regression models (ie, women nested within hospitals) were used to compare racial and ethnic differences in severe maternal morbidity before and after adjustment for maternal sociodemographic and pregnancy-related factors, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics. We also estimated the risk-standardized severe maternal morbidity rates for each hospital (N=245) and the percentage reduction in severe maternal morbidity if each group of racially and ethnically minoritized women gave birth at the same distribution of hospitals as non-Hispanic white women. RESULTS: Of the 3,020,525 women who gave birth, 39,192 (1.3%) had severe maternal morbidity (2.1% Black; 1.3% US-born Hispanic; 1.3% foreign-born Hispanic; 1.3% Asian and Pacific Islander; 1.1% white; 1.6% American Indian and Alaska Native, and Mixed-race referred to as Other). Risk-standardized rates of severe maternal morbidity ranged from 0.3 to 4.0 per 100 births across hospitals. After adjusting for covariates, the odds of severe maternal morbidity were greater among nonwhite women than white women in a given hospital (Black: odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.31); US-born Hispanic: odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-1.29; foreign-born Hispanic: odds ratio, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.24; Asian and Pacific Islander: odds ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.32; Other: odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.50). Among the studied hospital factors, only teaching status was associated with severe maternal morbidity in fully adjusted models. Although 33% of white women delivered in hospitals with the highest tertile of severe maternal morbidity rates compared with 53% of Black women, birth hospital only accounted for 7.8% of the differences in severe maternal morbidity comparing Black and white women and accounted for 16.1% to 24.2% of the differences for all other racial and ethnic groups. CONCLUSION: In California, excess odds of severe maternal morbidity among racially and ethnically minoritized women were not fully explained by birth hospital. Structural causes of racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity may vary by region, which warrants further examination to inform effective policies.


Subject(s)
Birth Setting/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Obstetric Labor Complications/ethnology , Pregnancy Complications/ethnology , Puerperal Disorders/ethnology , Adult , Black or African American , Asian , Blood Transfusion/statistics & numerical data , California/epidemiology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/ethnology , Eclampsia/ethnology , Emigrants and Immigrants , Female , Gestational Age , Health Equity , Heart Failure/ethnology , Hispanic or Latino , Hospitals, Private/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Hysterectomy/statistics & numerical data , Indians, North American , Indigenous Peoples , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Obesity, Maternal , Pregnancy , Prenatal Care , Pulmonary Edema/ethnology , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Sepsis/ethnology , Severity of Illness Index , Shock/ethnology , Tracheostomy/statistics & numerical data , White People , Young Adult
2.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 25(9): 1530-6, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20796151

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No studies focus on the population with perforated peptic ulcer in southeastern Taiwan. The present study aimed to assess the differences between the different races and the risk factors related to mortality and morbidity in postoperative patients in southeastern Taiwan. METHODS: The medical records of 237 patients were reviewed retrospectively. The following factors were analyzed: patient profiles, coexisting illnesses, diagnostic method, fever, preoperative shock, clinical data at emergency room, delay operation, site of perforation, operative method, positive ascites culture, species of microbes in ascites culture, postoperative complications, death and the length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Aborigines were significantly different from non-aborigines in the ratio of female cases and in the habits of alcohol drinking and betel nut chewing. There were also four significantly different variables between them: fever, hemoglobin value, site of perforation and operative method. Total postoperative complication rate was 41.3% and 39 patients (16.6%) died. In multivariate analysis, age > or = 65 years, lipase > upper normal limit and preoperative shock were independent predictors of mortality. Significant risk factors associated with morbidity were NSAIDs use, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL and preoperative shock. CONCLUSION: Aborigines were different from non-aborigines in several categories. In southeastern Taiwan, NSAIDs use, creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL and preoperative shock were independent risk factors of morbidity, and age > or = 65 years, lipase > upper normal limit and preoperative shock were independent risk factors of mortality in postoperative perforated peptic ulcer. Lipase > upper normal limit is needed for further research on the influence on mortality.


Subject(s)
Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Duodenal Ulcer/ethnology , Duodenal Ulcer/surgery , Peptic Ulcer Perforation/ethnology , Peptic Ulcer Perforation/surgery , Stomach Ulcer/ethnology , Stomach Ulcer/surgery , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alcohol Drinking/ethnology , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Areca/adverse effects , Biomarkers/blood , Chi-Square Distribution , Comorbidity , Creatinine/blood , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/mortality , Duodenal Ulcer/mortality , Female , Gastrectomy/adverse effects , Hemoglobins/analysis , Humans , Lipase/blood , Logistic Models , Male , Mastication/ethnology , Middle Aged , Peptic Ulcer Perforation/mortality , Preoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Shock/ethnology , Shock/mortality , Stomach Ulcer/mortality , Taiwan/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Vagotomy/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...