Cement-augmented locked plate fixation proximal humerus fractures in elderly patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systemic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of proximal humeral fracture in elderly patient fixation using locked plate with or without cement augmentation. METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched in August 2023 for literature comparing the clinical outcomes of patients with PHFs treated with locked plate alone and locked plate augmented with cement. Data describing study design; level of evidence; inclusion criteria; demographic information; final follow-up; revision rate; implant failure rate; avascular necrosis rate; total complication rate; constant score; and disability of arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score were collected. RESULTS: Eight studies (one randomized-controlled trial and seven observational studies), involving 664 patients, were identified. Compared with locked plates alone, using cement-augmented locked plates reduced the implant failure rate (odds ratio (OR) = 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10-0.39; P < 0.0001) and total complication rate (OR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.29-0.69; P = 0.0002) and improved DASH scores (mean difference (MD) = 2.99; 95% CI 1.00-4.98; P = 0.003). However, there was no significant difference in clinical outcomes, including revision rate, avascular necrosis rate, and constant score. CONCLUSION: In this review and meta-analysis, fixation of the PHFs in elderly patients using locked plates with or without cement augmentation has no significant difference in revision rate, but the implant failure and total complication rates may be lesser on using the cement-augmented locked plate for fixation than on using a locked plate alone. Good results are expected for most patients treated with this technique. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)21 guidelines were followed to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis and was registered as a protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42022318798).

Factors influencing shoulder stiffness after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to investigate the factors associated with shoulder stiffness following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of proximal humeral fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The retrospective study included a total of 151 patients who underwent ORIF of proximal humeral fractures between January 2016 and May 2021. Based on their shoulder joint motion at the latest follow-up, the patients were divided into two groups. The stiffness group (n=32; 8 males, 24 females; mean age: 62.4±9.3 years; range, 31 to 79 years), exhibited restricted shoulder forward flexion (<120°), limited arm lateral external rotation (<30°), and reduced back internal rotation below the L3 level. The remaining patients were included in the non-stiffness group (n=119; 52 males, 67 females; mean age: 56.4±13.4 years; range, 18 to 90 years). Various factors were examined to evaluate the association with shoulder stiffness following ORIF of proximal humeral fractures by multivariate unconditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 31.8±12.6 (range, 12 to 68) months. Based on the results of the multivariate regression analysis, it was found that high-energy injuries [compared to low-energy injuries; adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=7.706, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.564-15.579, p<0.001], a time from injury to surgery longer than one week (compared to a time from injury to surgery equal to or less than one week; aOR=5.275, 95% CI: 1.7321-9.472, p=0.031), and a body mass index (BMI) >24.0 kg/m2 (compared to a BMI between 18.5 and 24.0 kg/m2 ; aOR=4.427, 95% CI: 1.671-11.722, p=0.023) were identified as risk factors for shoulder stiffness following ORIF of proximal humeral fractures. CONCLUSION: High-energy injury, time from injury to surgery longer than one week, and BMI >24.0 kg/m2 were identified as independent risk factors for shoulder stiffness after proximal humeral fracture surgery, which should be treated with caution in clinical treatment.

[Bilateral Dorsal Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Humerus]. / Bilaterálna dorzálna luxacná zlomenina proximálneho humeru.

Fractures of the proximal humerus constitute approximately 5% of all fractures. Shoulder joint injuries without any external mechanical impact during seizures with the occurrence of spasms occur only sporadically. The occurrence rate is reported in approximately 0.4% of patients. Very rarely they occur in the form of epileptic seizure-induced dorsal fracturedislocation impacting both sides. The case report describes a case of a 48-year-old woman with no treatment for epileptic seizures in her medical history. During the first seizure she sustained a bilateral dorsal fracture-dislocation caused by a muscle spasm, without any other mechanical impact. The fractures were classified as a 3-fragment fracture on the right side and a 4-fragment fracture on the left side. After the patient's admission to the inpatient emergency department, reduction under anaesthesia was attempted. Subsequently, after preparation, open reduction and osteosynthesis using an angularly stable plate were performed as a two-stage surgery. No complications were observed postoperatively Currently, at 3 years after surgeries, the female patient has full mobility of her shoulder joints with no subjective difficulties. Key words: epilepsy, seizure, dorsal fracture-dislocation of the proximal humerus.

Quadruple Disruption of Superior Shoulder Suspensory Complex With Proximal Humerus Open Fracture-Dislocation: A Case Report.

CASE: A 34-year-old man was a restrained passenger involved in a high-speed rollover motor vehicle crash. The patient sustained a type 5 AC joint separation, severely comminuted intra-articular glenoid fracture with extension to the coracoid process base, displaced open scapular body fracture, a posterior shoulder dislocation of the glenohumeral joint, and a 2-part proximal humerus fracture. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report describing this injury pattern involving the superior shoulder suspensory complex with an associated open proximal humerus fracture-dislocation.

Early functional improvements using continuous passive motion therapy after angular-stable plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures - results of a prospective, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of continuous passive motion therapy (CPM) has led to promising results in the early phase of rehabilitation after surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears and arthrolysis of the elbow. However, its use has not been proven in other pathologies of the upper extremity. Therefore, the aim of the underlying study was to evaluate the use of CPM therapy after plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures. METHODS: 95 patients with isolated proximal humerus fractures were enrolled in a prospective, randomized study. Patients were assigned to a treatment group with (n = 48, CPM) or without CPM therapy (n = 47, CG). Four patients (2 of each cohort) violated the study protocol and were excluded. CPM therapy was used for 6 weeks after surgery 2-3 times daily. Functional (range of motion) and patient reported outcomes (PROM, Constant Score [CSS], QuickDASH, subjective shoulder value [SSV], pain on visual analogue scale [VAS]) were evaluated at 6 weeks, 3 and 12months. 60 patients completed the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: The average patient age was 65.3 years (min: 27, max: 88, SD: ± 14.7). Seventy-two patients were female (79%). There was no difference regarding injury severity (2/3/4 part-fracture: 6/32/7 vs. 9/26/11, p = 0.867) and sex (p = 0.08). However, patients in the CPM group were significantly younger (CPM: 67 [min: 34, max: 82], CG: 74 [min: 27, max: 88], p = 0.032). After 6 weeks we observed a better range of motion for forward flexion (CPM: 90° [min: 50°, max: 180°] vs. CG: 80° [min: 20°, max: 170°] p = 0.035) and abduction (CPM: 80° [min: 40°, max: 180°] vs. CG: 70° [min: 20°, max: 180°], p = 0.048) in the CPM group. There was no difference regarding the further planes of motion or the assessed PROMs at 6 weeks. At 3 and 12 months the results between the treatment groups equalized with no further significant differences. CONCLUSION: The treatment with CPM increases the range of motion after plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures in the first 6 weeks after surgery. This effect is not sustained after 3 and 12months. The evaluated PROMs are not being influenced by CPM therapy. Hence the results of this prospective randomized study suggest that CPM can be a beneficial asset in the early period of rehabilitation after proximal humerus plate osteosynthesis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered in the US National Institutes of Health's database ( http://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov ) registry under NCT05952622.

Acute-on-Chronic Axillary Artery Thrombus After Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty for Failed Proximal Humerus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: A Case Report.

CASE: A 71-year-old woman presented with post-traumatic arthritis 11 months after open reduction and internal fixation for a left proximal humerus fracture (PHF) dislocation. After revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA), the patient's left upper extremity was found to be avascular. An emergent thrombectomy was performed with restoration of arterial flow after removal of an acute-on-chronic axillary artery thrombus. CONCLUSION: Although rare, as rTSA becomes more common for management of PHF, incidence of associated vascular injuries is likely to rise. Screening methods and clinical vigilance in diagnosis are advised for patients with anterior PHF dislocations and arterial injury risk factors.

Converting to reverse shoulder arthroplasty from primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty and fracture hemiarthroplasty: a radiographic and clinical outcome analysis at 8-years.

INTRODUCTION: Revision shoulder arthroplasty can be challenging. One of the main considerations for surgeons is the type of implant that was placed in the initial surgery. Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty (ASA) is used for cases of osteoarthritis as well as for fractures of the humeral head. Hemiarthroplasty can be used for complex proximal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a difference in clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients that failed primary fracture hemiarthroplasty (FHA), or ASA for osteoarthritis and then required reoperation with a conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). METHODS: Patients with failed anatomic shoulder replacement, who had undergone conversion to RSA, were enrolled after a mean follow-up of 107 (85-157) months. Two different groups, one with failed ASA implanted for osteoarthritis and one with failed FHA, were created. At follow-up patients were assessed with standard radiographs and clinical outcome scores. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients (f = 17, m = 12; 51%) suffered from a failed ASA (Group A), while the remaining 28 patients (f = 21, m = 74; 49%) had been revised due to a failed FHA (Group B). Patients of Group B had a poorer Constant score (Group A: 60 vs. Group B: 46; p = 0.02). Abduction (Group A: 115° vs. Group B: 89°; p = 0.02) was worse after conversion of a failed FHA to RSA in comparison to conversions of failed ASA. The mean bone loss of the lateral metaphysis was higher in patients with failed FHA (Group A: 5 mm vs. Group B: 20 mm; p = 0.0). CONCLUSION: The initial indication for anatomic shoulder arthroplasty influences the clinical and radiological outcome after conversion to RSA. Conversion of failed FHA to RSA is related to an increased metaphyseal bone loss, decreased range of motion and poorer clinical outcomes when compared to conversions of failed ASA implanted for osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III Retrospective Cohort Comparison Study.

Clinical outcomes of conservative versus surgical treatment for patients with proximal humeral fracture before physiotherapy.

Fear of movement, pain, and loss of shoulder function are the most common problems irrespective of their approach to management after proximal humeral fracture (PHF). However, it has been unclear whether there could be differences between both treatments in early clinical outcomes. It can help physiotherapists to guide in choosing treatment approaches. This study aimed to compare kinesiophobia, pain, range of motion (ROM), shoulder function, and Quality of life (QoL) in patients treated with either conservative (CT) versus surgical (ST) after PHF. In addition, it aimed to determine correlations between fear of movement and seconder outcome measures. This cross-sectional study enrolled the patients having 5-6 weeks (being permitted active movement) after being treated either CT or ST and receiving no physical therapy. Pain, passive and active ROMs, shoulder function, fear of movement, and QoL were evaluated. 42 patients were recruited. Kinesiophobia scores were similar (p=0.55) and moderate in both groups. There was a significant difference in degrees of shoulder active flexion, active and passive abduction in favor of the CT group (p=0.05, p=0.02, p=0.04, respectively). However, there was no difference between groups regarding the remaining clinical outcomes. Furthermore, kinesiophobia showed a moderate negative correlation with energy/fatigue, social functioning, and general health. These findings showed that patients treated surgically did not have more kinesiophobia, less function, and QoL before starting physiotherapy, despite having soft tissue damage and different types of fractures. However, surgically treated patients had significantly less range of motion.

Primary stability in locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures may be increased by using an additional nail osteosynthesis in combination with locking plate osteosynthesis-A biomechanical comparison.

BACKGROUND: Stability is regarded as an important factor for proper healing and avoiding secondary dislocation in osteoporotic fractures of the proximal humerus. Several surgical techniques have been proposed for treatment, including intramedullary nail osteosynthesis and locking plate fixation. This study introduces a novel approach that combines both techniques and compares its primary stability with conventional methods. METHODS: The study involved 25 osteoporotic humeri with two-part fracture models, which were randomly assigned to locking-plate fixation, intramedullary nailing, or a combination of both techniques. The specimens were subjected to sinusoidal loading at 250 N in 20° abduction for 5000 cycles and then to quasi-static loading until failure. Fracture movement, failure mode, and failure load were measured and compared among the groups. FINDINGS: The groups fixated with intramedullary nailing and the groups fixated with intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation showed significantly lower fracture motion than the group using locking plate fixation only (p < 0.005) and significantly higher load to failure (p = 0.007 and p = 0.0062, respectively). There was no significant difference between the group using intramedullary nailing and the group using locking-plate fixation and intramedullary nailing in fracture movement or load-to-failure (p > 0.005). INTERPRETATION: The results indicate that locking plate fixation provides less primary stability than intramedullary nailing or the combined of both techniques. This combined approach may offer advantages as a treatment for complex proximal humeral fractures in osteoporotic bone, and specific implants should be developed to ensure optimal treatment.

[Clinical effect of allogeneic peroneal bone marrow support combined with plate fixation for the treatment of Neer type â £ proximal humeral fractures].

OBJECTIVE: To explore clinical effect of allogeneic peroneal bone marrow support combined with plate internal fixation in treating Neer type Ⅳproximal humeral fractures. METHODS: From December 2017 to December 2020,12 patients with Neer type Ⅳ proximal humeral fractures were treated with allogeneic peroneal bone marrow support combined with plate internal fixation,including 7 males and 5 females,aged from 56 to 78 years old;the time from injury to operation ranged from 1 to7 days. Operative time,fracture healing time and complications during follow-up were observed,and clinical efficacy was evaluated by Constant-Murley score at the latest follow-up. RESULTS: All patients were obtained follow up for 20 to 29 months. All patients got bone healing and incisicons were healed at stageⅠ,operative time ranged from 95 to 138 min,blood loss ranged from 210 to 275 ml,fracture healing time ranged from 14 to 18 weeks. Two patients occurred postoperative shoulder stiffness and recovered after 2 weeks of passive exercise. There were no complications such as infection,poor wound healing,and failure (fracture and loosening) of internal fixators occurred. Constant-Murley shoulder function score ranged from 69 to 89 at the latest follow up,2 patients got excellent results,9 good and 1 fair. CONCLUSION: The application of allogeneic fibular bone marrow placement could provide effective support for medial humerus,which is conducive to assisting reduction of fracture end,reducing occurrence of internal fixation failure caused by collapse of humerus head and screw perforation,and significantly improving function of shoulder joint.

[Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty - Current Concepts]. / Inverse Schulterendoprothetik ­ aktueller Stand.

Due to first promising long term outcome data, reverse shoulder arthroplasty experienced an immense increase of usage during the past decade. Moreover, the initial Grammont concept has constantly been refined and adapted to current scientific findings. Therefore, clinical and radiological problems like scapular notching and postoperative instability were constantly addressed but do still remain an area of concern.This article summarises current concepts in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and gives an overview of actual indications like cuff tear arthropathy, severe osteoarthritis, proximal humerus fractures, tumours, fracture sequelae as well as revision surgery and their corresponding clinical and radiological results.

Valgising angular stable plate fixation in the treatment of multifragmentary proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

INTRODUCTION: The frequency of proximal humeral fractures shows an increasing tendency, especially in the elderly, who are frequently affected by osteoporosis. The adequate treatment of complex, displaced fractures poses a serious challenge. Among surgical treatment options, osteosynthesis with an angular stable plate is preferred, however, the implant-related complication rate may be exceptionally high. In our present study, we report the short-term outcomes of our new method of valgising angular stable plate fixation which we use for multifragmentary, displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of 52 patients (46 female and 6 male, age: 71.9 ± 9.6) who suffered dislocated three- or four-part fractures and underwent valgising angular stable plate fixation. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 17.3 months, while the functional outcomes were as following: excellent in 26, good in 18, moderate in 5 and poor in 3 patients. The mean Constant-Murley Score was 82.5 ± 11.2. Functional outcomes only showed significant correlation (p = 0.031) with age and were proven unrelated to fracture type, BMI and known primary diseases. The cumulative complication rate was 9.6% and revision rate was 5.8%. Neurological deficit, pseudoarthrosis or avascular humeral head necrosis did not occur during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Valgising angular stable plate fixation that we apply for proximal humeral fractures provided favourable functional outcomes and a low postoperative complication rate due to the optimal head and plate placement. The method is especially effective for the treatment of displaced three- and four-part fractures with weakened, osteoporotic bone structure.

Outcomes of proximal humerus fractures in children: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Paediatric proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) have historically been treated non-operatively. However, the management of severely displaced PHFs in older children has been debated over the years, with contemporary studies advocating for surgery. The purpose of this study was to review the outcomes of a cohort of paediatric patients treated for a PHF to guide management of future paediatric PHFs. METHODS: The records of the Women's and Children's Hospital in South Australia were reviewed to identify paediatric PHFs occurring between 1 January 2010 and 1 June 2020. Participants completed the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the Paediatric Outcomes Data Collection Instrument via phone interview. Participants' shoulder range-of-motion was assessed via telehealth using Zoom. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify patient and clinical variables that were associated with a poorer outcome. RESULTS: Of 307 patients contacted, 125 participated. Forty-six patients met the definition of a poorer clinical outcome, defined as a QuickDASH score of ≥2. Fractures of greater severity were predictive of a poorer outcome, and patients aged ≥12 years old at the time of injury had higher total QuickDASH scores. The findings did not suggest that these subgroups of patients have superior outcomes if treated surgically. CONCLUSION: The majority of paediatric PHFs have an acceptable clinical outcome, irrespective of treatment methodology. Multicentre prospective studies are required to establish the indications for surgery for adolescent patients with severely displaced PHFs.

Three-dimensional printed models can reduce costs and surgical time for complex proximal humeral fractures: preoperative planning, patient satisfaction, and improved resident skills.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humeral fractures (PHFs) are still controversial with regards to treatment and are difficult to classify. The study's objective is to show that preoperative planning performed while handling a three-dimensional (3D) printed anatomical model of the fracture can ensure a better understanding of trauma for both surgeons and patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients (group A, cases) with complex PHF were evaluated preoperatively by reproducing life-size, full-touch 3D anatomical models. Intraoperative blood loss, radiographic controls, duration of surgery, and clinical outcomes of patients in group A were compared with 20 patients (group B, controls) who underwent standard preoperative evaluation. Additionally, senior surgeons and residents, as well as group A patients, answered a questionnaire to evaluate innovative preoperative planning and patient compliance. Cost analysis was evaluated. RESULTS: Intraoperative radiography controls and length of operation were significantly shorter in group A. There were no differences in clinical outcomes or blood loss. Patients claim a better understanding of the trauma suffered and the proposed treatment. Surgeons assert that the planning of the definitive operation with 3D models has had a good impact. The development of this tool has been well received by the residents. The surgery was reduced in length by 15%, resulting in savings of about EUR 400 for each intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer intraoperative radiography checks, shorter surgeries, and better patient compliance reduce radiation exposure for patients and healthcare staff, enhance surgical outcomes while reducing expenses, and lower the risk of medicolegal claims. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, prospective randomized case-control study.

Transitivity, coherence, and reliability of network meta-analyses comparing proximal humerus fracture treatments: a meta-epidemiological study.

BACKGROUND: Network meta-analyses can be valuable for decision-makers in guiding clinical practice. However, for network meta-analysis results to be reliable, the assumptions of both transitivity and coherence must be met, and the methodology should adhere to current best practices. We aimed to assess whether network meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing interventions for proximal humerus fractures provide reliable estimates of intervention effects. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for network meta-analyses comparing interventions for proximal humerus fractures. We critically assessed the methodology regarding the development of a protocol, search strategy, trial inclusion, outcome extraction, and the methods used to conduct the network meta-analyses. We assessed the transitivity and coherence of the network graphs for the Constant score (CS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score (DASH), and additional surgery. Transitivity was assessed by comparing probable effect modifiers (age, gender, fracture morphology, and comorbidities) across intervention comparisons. Coherence was assessed using Separating Indirect from Direct Evidence (SIDE) (Separating Indirect from Direct Evidence) and the design-by-treatment interaction test. We used CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-analyses) to assess the confidence in the results. RESULTS: None of the three included network meta-analyses had a publicly available protocol or data-analysis plan, and they all had methodological flaws that could threaten the validity of their results. Although we did not detect incoherence for most comparisons, the transitivity assumption was violated for CS, DASH, and additional surgery in all three network meta-analyses. Additionally, the confidence in the results was 'very low' primarily due to within-study bias, reporting bias, intransitivity, imprecision, and heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Current network meta-analyses of RCTs comparing interventions for proximal humerus fractures do not provide reliable estimates of intervention effects. We advise caution in using these network meta-analyses to guide clinical practice. To improve the utility of network meta-analyses to guide clinical practice, journal editors should require that network meta-analyses are done according to a predefined analysis plan in a publicly available protocol and that both coherence and transitivity have been adequately assessed and reported.

Assessing complications and functional outcomes in proximal humerus fracture management: a retrospective comparison between conservative and intramedullary nailing treatments.

INTRODUCTION: Fractures of the proximal end of the humerus (FPH) are the second most common fractures in the upper limb after fractures of the distal radius and are two to three times as common in women than in men. Therefore, the main objective of the present study was to compare and analyze the complications and the functional outcomes in patients with displaced FPH receiving conservative and surgical treatments with intramedullary nailing. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to establish the differences in complications risks between surgical and non-surgical treatment of the FPH. For this purpose, the clinical and radiological results of 67 consecutive patients were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were included in the non-surgically treated group. A total of 42 patients were included in the surgically treated group. Complications occurred in a total of 4 (16.0%) patients after the non-surgical treatment. Those included frozen shoulder (n = 2), nonunion (n = 1), and avascular necrosis of the humeral head (n = 1). Complications occurred in a total of 18 (42.6%) patients after the surgical treatment. Non-surgically treated patients had statistically significantly (p < 0.05) lower scores in the Constant-Murley scale in all of the categories. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates an overall prevalence of complications to be 16% in patients treated conservatively and 42.6% in patients treated surgically. In the non-surgical cohort, the frozen shoulder was the most frequently observed complication (8%). Interestingly, non-anatomical repositioning was the most prevalent complication in surgically treated patients. Due to the complexity of the FPH, we believe that the surgeon needs to have comprehensive knowledge regarding the characteristics of this fracture, the available treatment options, and the possible complications that may occur. This can enhance patient safety and provide satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Tuberosity refixation improves functional outcome following primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty in proximal humeral fracture.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this prospective study was to examine clinical results of tuberosity refixation in RSA for the treatment of displaced PHF in elderly patients. We hypothesized that tuberosity refixation would increase clinical outcome. METHODS: In this prospective study, 50 patients were included after receive a primary RSA for complex proximal humeral fracture between March 2013 and December 2015 for follow-up after three, 12 and 24 months. A functional and radiological assessment was performed on the patients. RESULTS: At final follow-up after a mean period of 25.1 months, data were available for 30 women and 6 men (74% of the included overall study collective) with a mean age of 77 years (range 55-93 years) at time of surgery. The tuberosities were refixated in 74% (n = 37) and in 26% (n = 13) resected. RSA with tuberosity refixation resulted in better clinical shoulder function compared to RSA with non-refixated tuberosities. The data show an external rotation with a significant difference (24.9° vs. 14°, p < 0.05) in favor of participants with refixation. The raw CMS was statistically significant (71.3 vs. 56.3, p < 0.05) after refixation, and SSV was significant improved (82.7% vs. 68%, p < 0.05) in the same group. Among 3 of 50 patients a total of 3 complications occurred with a total of 6% surgical revision. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective study, tuberosity refixation as part of fracture treatment using RSA results in better external rotation, subjective assessment of shoulder recovery (measured by SSV and by raw CMS) in elderly patients, compared with tuberosity excision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II, Prospective comparative study.

Great tuberosity fixation does not affect healing and clinical outcomes in RSA performed in proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.

PURPOSE: Aims of our study were to define whether the great tuberosity (GT) positioning fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) after proximal humeral fracture (PHF) could predict tuberosity healing and its impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: We enrolled 59 patients treated with cementless reverse shoulder arthroplasty after PHF in our institute between 2012 and 2018. The mean follow-up was 57 months (± 23.4). We divided patients into two groups according to GT positioning after fixation: Group 1 GT in contact and Group 2 GT detached at least 1 mm from humeral diaphysis. Clinical and radiographic evaluations were conducted at last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall GT healing rate was 64.4%, (Group 1 70.7%-Group 2 50%). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.047) was found in cortical thickness narrowing at one-third of stem length. We found a correlation between lateral cortical narrowing and GT fixation in non-anatomical position, but we observed no statistically significant differences about GT healing according to GT anatomical or non-anatomical fixation. No differences were found in shoulder function in patients whose tuberosity was healed or failed to heal. CONCLUSION: GT reduction is not a predictive factor for GT healing; external stress shielding, instead, seems to be decreased in patients with postoperative anatomically reduced GT. In our study, GT healing did not affect clinical outcomes or patient's satisfaction in elderly low-demanding patients.

Comparative efficacy and safety of medical treatments for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques and conservative therapies are useful tools for treating proximal humerus fractures (PHFs), but it is important to understand how to properly utilize them. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare and rank the efficacy and safety of medical treatments for PHF. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched for eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception until June 2022. Conservative therapy-controlled or head-to-head RCTs of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), hemiarthroplasty (HA), and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) used for the treatment of adult patients with PHF were included. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities were applied to compare and rank the effects of medical treatments for PHF. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs involving 1,182 patients with PHF were selected for the final analysis. Mostly baseline characteristics among groups were well balanced, and the imbalanced factors only included age, injury type, medial comminution, blood loss, and cognitive function in single trial. The SUCRA probabilities found that RTSA provided the best effect on the Constant-Murley score (SUCRA: 100.0%), and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score (SUCRA: 99.0%). Moreover, HA (SUCRA: 85.5%) and RTSA (SUCRA: 68.0%) had a relatively better effect on health-related quality of life than the other treatment modalities. Furthermore, conservative therapy (SUCRA: 84.3%) and RTSA (SUCRA: 80.7%) were associated with a lower risk of secondary surgery. Finally, the best effects on the risk of complications are varied, including infection was observed with conservative therapy (SUCRA: 94.2%); avascular necrosis was observed in HA (SUCRA: 78.1%), nonunion was observed in RTSA (SUCRA: 69.6%), and osteoarthritis was observed in HA (SUCRA: 93.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that RTSA was associated with better functional outcomes, while the comparative outcomes of secondary surgery and complications varied. Optimal treatment for PHF should consider patient-specific factors.