Association of atrial fibrillation in patients with interatrial block over prospectively followed controls with comparable echocardiographic parameters.

Interatrial block (IAB) (P wave >or=110 ms) is a potential risk of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, few investigations have assessed the relevance of echocardiographic parameters, particularly the contribution of its known correlate, left atrial enlargement in this regard. We identified 32 consecutive patients with comparable echocardiographic parameters, such as left atrial dimension and left ventricular ejection fraction. Patients were evaluated for IAB and followed for 15 months for cardiovascular events (heart failure, transient ischemic attacks, and stroke), atrial tachyarrhythmias (AF/atrial flutter), and death. Preexisting AF and IAB (p = 0.02) were significantly associated with future AF events. However, logistic regression analysis indicated that IAB was not an independent predictor of future AF, only preexisting atrial tachyarrhythmias was (hazard ratio 39.5, 95% confidence interval 2.7 to 576.3, p = 0.007). In conclusion, in patients with comparable echocardiographic parameters, such as left atrial size and left ventricular ejection fraction, IAB remained associated with AF after a 15-month follow-up. Additional investigation is needed to confirm the extent of the association.

Limited utility of interatrial block in predicting ischemia on coronary angiography in patients with suboptimal exercise performance.

INTRODUCTION: Interatrial block (P waves > or = 110 ms) is thought to be associated with underlying myocardial ischemia during exercise but has not been extensively investigated in patients with suboptimal or borderline exercise tolerance tests (< 3 min exercise). We utilized coronary angiography to assess the relationship of both, the resting baseline and exercise induced increase in P-wave duration with coronary artery disease among patients who had undergone such tests. METHODS: We prospectively identified 51 consecutive patients with interatrial block who had coronary artery disease and hypertension but not atrioventricular valvular heart disease, and had undergone coronary angiography to evaluate myocardial ischemia after a suboptimal exercise tolerance test. A control group of 64 consecutive exercise tolerance test patients with similar preliminary characteristics but without interatrial block at rest was used for comparison. Patients from both groups were then appraised for significant obstructive lesions (> 70%) on coronary angiography that were suggestive of myocardial ischemia. RESULTS: Obstructive coronary artery lesions suggestive of myocardial ischemia were more frequent among interatrial block patients but this was not statistically significant (p=0.25). However, change in P-wave duration of > 20 ms occurred more frequently in interatrial block patients in the presence of a positive exercise tolerance test. Among patients without interatrial block at baseline, more patients who developed new interatrial block had significant disease on coronary angiography. CONCLUSION: The utility of using interatrial block toward predicting myocardial ischemia among patients with suboptimal exercise tolerance tests is limited. However, further investigation on the early change in P-wave duration in patients with interatrial block and the development of new interatrial block during exercise could be helpful in optimizing exercise tolerance tests, particularly when borderline or suboptimal.