Plazomicin: an intravenous aminoglycoside antibacterial for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections.

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance continues to be a major public health concern due to the emergence and spread of multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms, including extended spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) and carbapenemase producing Enterobacterales. Plazomicin is a novel aminoglycoside that demonstrates activity against MDR gram-negatives, including those producing ESBLs and most carbapenemases, and retains activity against aminoglycoside modifying enzymes as a result of structural modifications. The information discussed is meant to assist in identifying plazomicin's place in therapy and to expand the clinician's armamentarium. AREAS COVERED: Herein, we review the pharmacology, microbiology, clinical efficacy, and safety of plazomicin. To gather relevant information, a literature search was performed using PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar electronic databases. Search terms used include plazomicin, ACHN-490, extended spectrum ß-lactamase, ESBL, CRE, aminoglycoside modifying enzymes, and AME. Additional information was obtained from FDA review documents and research abstracts presented at international conferences. EXPERT OPINION: Plazomicin is a promising carbapenem or ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor-sparing alternative for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections caused by MDR Enterobacterales. Although robust data for bloodstream infections and bacterial pneumonias are lacking, plazomicin may be considered in individual clinical scenarios if combination therapy is warranted provided supportive microbiological data and therapeutic drug monitoring are available.

Plazomicin: A New Aminoglycoside.

Plazomicin (ACHN-490) is a novel parenteral aminoglycoside developed to target multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. It has recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the management of complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis caused by susceptible organisms. When compared with meropenem, plazomicin was not inferior. The adverse-event profile for plazomicin was comparable to meropenem except for an increased additional rise in serum creatinine in the plazomicin arm compared with the meropenem arm. This review focuses on the mode of action, antimicrobial activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical indications, and safety profile of this drug. Considerations for formulary addition and its place in therapy are also discussed.

Once-Daily Plazomicin for Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.

BACKGROUND: The increasing multidrug resistance among gram-negative uropathogens necessitates new treatments for serious infections. Plazomicin is an aminoglycoside with bactericidal activity against multidrug-resistant (including carbapenem-resistant) Enterobacteriaceae. METHODS: We randomly assigned 609 patients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), including acute pyelonephritis, in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous plazomicin (15 mg per kilogram of body weight once daily) or meropenem (1 g every 8 hours), with optional oral step-down therapy after at least 4 days of intravenous therapy, for a total of 7 to 10 days of therapy. The primary objective was to show the noninferiority of plazomicin to meropenem in the treatment of complicated UTIs, including acute pyelonephritis, with a noninferiority margin of 15 percentage points. The primary end points were composite cure (clinical cure and microbiologic eradication) at day 5 and at the test-of-cure visit (15 to 19 days after initiation of therapy) in the microbiologic modified intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: Plazomicin was noninferior to meropenem with respect to the primary efficacy end points. At day 5, composite cure was observed in 88.0% of the patients (168 of 191 patients) in the plazomicin group and in 91.4% (180 of 197 patients) in the meropenem group (difference, -3.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -10.0 to 3.1). At the test-of-cure visit, composite cure was observed in 81.7% (156 of 191 patients) and 70.1% (138 of 197 patients), respectively (difference, 11.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.7 to 20.3). At the test-of-cure visit, a higher percentage of patients in the plazomicin group than in the meropenem group were found to have microbiologic eradication, including eradication of Enterobacteriaceae that were not susceptible to aminoglycosides (78.8% vs. 68.6%) and Enterobacteriaceae that produce extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (82.4% vs. 75.0%). At late follow-up (24 to 32 days after initiation of therapy), fewer patients in the plazomicin group than in the meropenem group had microbiologic recurrence (3.7% vs. 8.1%) or clinical relapse (1.6% vs. 7.1%). Increases in serum creatinine levels of 0.5 mg or more per deciliter (≥40 µmol per liter) above baseline occurred in 7.0% of patients in the plazomicin group and in 4.0% in the meropenem group. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily plazomicin was noninferior to meropenem for the treatment of complicated UTIs and acute pyelonephritis caused by Enterobacteriaceae, including multidrug-resistant strains. (Funded by Achaogen and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority; EPIC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02486627.).

A Phase 1 Study of Intravenous Plazomicin in Healthy Adults to Assess Potential Effects on the QT/QTc Interval, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics.

Plazomicin is an aminoglycoside with in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, crossover study assessed the potential effects of plazomicin on cardiac repolarization (NCT01514929). Fifty-six healthy adults (24 men, 32 women) received a single therapeutic dose of plazomicin (15 mg/kg administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion), a single supratherapeutic dose of plazomicin (20 mg/kg administered by 30-minute intravenous infusion), placebo, or oral moxifloxacin (400 mg). The primary end point was the baseline-adjusted, placebo-corrected QTc interval using the Fridericia formula (ΔΔQTcF). Assay sensitivity was concluded if the lower limit of a 1-sided 95%CI (adjusted for multiplicity using the Hochberg procedure) for moxifloxacin ΔΔQTcF was >5 milliseconds at ≥1 prespecified time points. No QT prolongation effect for plazomicin was concluded if the largest mean effect was <5 milliseconds, and the upper limit of a 2-sided 90%CI for plazomicin ΔΔQTcF was <10 milliseconds at all time points. Assay sensitivity was demonstrated based on moxifloxacin ΔΔQTcF. No QT prolongation effect for plazomicin was concluded because the largest mean ΔΔQTcF for plazomicin was 3.5 milliseconds, and the highest upper limit was 5.6 milliseconds. No clinically relevant changes were observed in electrocardiograms. For the 15- and 20-mg/kg dose levels of plazomicin, mean peak plasma concentration values were 76.0 and 96.6 mg/L, and mean values of the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours were 263 and 327 mg·h/L, respectively. Model-derived pharmacokinetic parameters and safety findings were generally consistent with previously reported plazomicin studies. In conclusion, therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of plazomicin had no clinically significant effect on cardiac repolarization and were generally well tolerated.

Plazomicin: A Next-Generation Aminoglycoside.

Plazomicin is a novel aminoglycoside antibiotic that binds to the bacterial 30S ribosomal subunit, thus inhibiting protein synthesis in a concentration-dependent manner. Plazomicin displays a broad spectrum of activity against aerobic gram-negative bacteria including extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and organisms with aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. In a large phase III clinical trial, plazomicin was shown to be noninferior to meropenem in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) with respect to the coprimary efficacy end points of the microbiologically modified intent-to-treat composite cure rate at day 5 (plazomicin 88% [168/191 subjects] vs meropenem 91.4% [180/197]) and at the test-of-cure visit (plazomicin 81.7% [156/191] vs meropenem 70.1% [138/197]). In a small phase III clinical trial, plazomicin was shown to be effective in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. It was associated with a lower all-cause mortality or significant disease-related complication rate (23.5% [4/17]) compared with colistin (50% [10/20]). The most common adverse reactions associated with plazomicin are decreased renal function, diarrhea, hypertension, headache, nausea, vomiting, and hypotension. As with other aminoglycosides, plazomicin may cause neuromuscular blockade, ototoxicity, and fetal harm in pregnant women. Due to limited efficacy and safety data, plazomicin is indicated for the treatment of cUTIs in adults with limited or no alternative treatment options, using a dosage regimen of 15 mg/kg intravenously every 24 hours for 4-7 days. Dosage reductions and therapeutic drug monitoring are warranted in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. Plazomicin is not recommended in patients with severe renal impairment including those receiving renal replacement therapy. With the approval of plazomicin, clinicians now have an additional option for the treatment of adults with cUTIs, particularly those caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative rods.

Plazomicin for the treatment of patients with complicated urinary tract infection.

In June 2018, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved plazomicin, a novel neoglycoside, for the treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections who have limited or no alternative treatment options. This approval was based on substantial preclinical and clinical work, and marks an important advance in the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. This manuscript reviews the in vivo and in vitro work that led to the approval of plazomicin and examines how the drug may be used in the years ahead to treat patients with aggressive and life-threatening infections.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 2 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Plazomicin Compared with Levofloxacin in the Treatment of Complicated Urinary Tract Infection and Acute Pyelonephritis.

Increasing antimicrobial resistance among uropathogens limits treatment options for patients with complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI). Plazomicin, a new aminoglycoside, has in vitro activity against multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, including isolates resistant to currently available aminoglycosides, as well as extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae We evaluated the efficacy and safety of plazomicin in a double-blind, comparator-controlled, phase 2 study in adults with cUTI or acute pyelonephritis. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive intravenous plazomicin (10 or 15 mg/kg of body weight) or intravenous levofloxacin (750 mg) once daily for 5 days. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were microbiological eradication at the test of cure (TOC; 5 to 12 days after the last dose) in the modified intent-to-treat (MITT) and microbiologically evaluable (ME) populations. Overall, 145 patients were randomized to treatment. In the groups receiving plazomicin at 10 mg/kg, plazomicin at 15 mg/kg, and levofloxacin, microbiological eradication rates were, respectively, 50.0% (6 patients with microbiological eradication at TOC/12 patients treated [95% confidence interval {CI}, 21.1 to 78.9%]), 60.8% (31/51 [95% CI, 46.1 to 74.2%]), and 58.6% (17/29 [95% CI, 38.9 to 76.5%]) in the MITT population and 85.7% (6/7 [95% CI, 42.1 to 99.6%]), 88.6% (31/35 [95% CI, 73.3 to 96.8%]), and 81.0% (17/21 [95% CI, 58.1 to 94.6%]) in the ME population. In the MITT population, 66.7% (95% CI, 34.9 to 90.1%), 70.6% (95% CI, 56.2 to 82.5%), and 65.5% (95% CI, 45.7 to 82.1%) of the patients in the three groups, respectively, were assessed by the investigator to be clinically cured at TOC. Adverse events were reported in 31.8%, 35.1%, and 47.7% of the patients in the three groups, respectively. Serum creatinine values were generally stable over the course of the study. No plazomicin-treated patients with evaluable audiometry data had postbaseline sensorineural, conductive, or mixed hearing loss. In summary, plazomicin demonstrated microbiological and clinical success and an overall safety profile supportive of further clinical development. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT01096849.).

Plazomicin: an investigational therapy for the treatment of urinary tract infections.

INTRODUCTION: Living in the ever-expanding era of multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and even pandrug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms, the medical community is facing the approaching fear of the "End of Antibiotics." Plazomicin is a next-generation aminoglycoside designed to evade all clinically relevant aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes, the main mechanism of aminoglycoside resistance. A newer aminoglycoside active against several MDR-XDR microorganisms is herein presented and discussed. AREAS COVERED: Herein, the authors present the currently available information on plazomicin. This includes the current knowledge concerning plazomicin's: mechanisms of action, in vitro activity and interactions, its pharmacokinetics, its clinical efficacy in complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and acute pyelonephritis, and its toxicity issues. EXPERT OPINION: Plazomicin was developed to evade all clinically relevant aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Unfortunately, ribosomal enzymatic modification by ribosomal 16S-rRNA methyltransferases confers broad-spectrum high-level aminoglycoside resistance. Still, plazomicin demonstrates high activity against the Enterobacteriaceae including extended spectrum beta lactamase and most carbapenemase producers, as well as several of the non-fermenters. When compared to levofloxacin, the in vivo activity of plazomicin in complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) and in acute pyelonephritis in humans was very promising. Furthermore, regarding safety, no clinically significant effects on renal, vestibular, or cochlear function have been observed both at Phase I and II studies in humans, with mild to moderate adverse events being dose related. However, the authors believe that the real position of plazomicin in the MDR-XDR world will be revealed once pending Phase III studies are completed.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of single and multiple doses of ACHN-490 injection administered intravenously in healthy subjects.

ACHN-490 is an aminoglycoside with activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens, including those resistant to currently used aminoglycosides. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical studies investigated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of ACHN-490 injection in healthy subjects. Study 1 used a parallel-group design with escalating single (SD) and multiple doses (MD). Study 2 explored a longer duration of the highest dose tolerated in the first study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive either ACHN-490 injection or a placebo administered by a 10-min intravenous infusion. Study 1 enrolled 39 subjects (30 active and 9 placebo) and consisted of a single dose of 1 mg/kg body weight followed by ascending SD and MD cohorts of 4, 7, 11, and 15 mg/kg for 10, 10, 5, and 3 days, respectively. Study 2 enrolled 8 subjects (6 active and 2 placebo) who received 15 mg/kg for 5 days. Safety was assessed from adverse event (AE) reporting, standard clinical laboratory procedures, and testing for renal, cochlear, and vestibular function. ACHN-490 exhibited linear and dose-proportional PK, with agreement between the studies for PK parameters assessed. The 15-mg/kg dose did not accumulate with repeated dosing over 5 days. Mean steady-state (±standard deviation) area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)), maximum concentration of drug in serum (C(max)), half-life (t(1/2)), clearance, and volume of distribution at steady state (V(ss)) for the 15-mg/kg, day 5 dose were 239 ± 45 h·mg/liter, 113 ± 17 mg/liter, 3 ± 0.3 h, 1.1 ± 0.1 ml/min/kg, and 0.24 ± 0.04 liters/kg, respectively. AEs were mild to moderate and rapidly resolved. No evidence of nephrotoxicity or ototoxicity was observed.

Skin necrosis after injection of aminosides. Arthus reaction, local toxicity, thrombotic process or pathergy?

A case of extensive skin necrosis following intramuscular injections of sisomycin is described. Eight cases of necrosis following subcutaneous injections of aminoside antibiotics have been reported in elderly females under anticoagulant theray, but the pathogenic mechanisms of these lesions have not been investigated. Defective fibrinolysis and abnormalities of oxidative metabolism of neutrophils were noted in our patient. Four major mechanisms are discussed: an Arthus reaction, a thrombotic process, a direct toxicity of aminosides for subcutaneous tissue, or a pyoderma-like neutrophilic reaction. Subjects with a tendency to thrombosis and/or abnormalities of neutrophil functions may be predisposed to these skin necroses.

[Effect of ethyl ether of apovincaminic acid (Cavinton) on the ototoxic action of sisomicin in guinea pigs]. / Wplyw estru etylowego kwasu apowinkaminowego (cavintonu) na efekt ototoksyczny sisomycyny u swinek morskich.

The aim of this work was to evaluate the protective effect of etyl ether of apovincaminic acid (Cavinton) against the ototoxic effect of sisomycin in the experimental condition. The first group of guinea pigs were given 14 days sisomycin. The second sisomycin and cavinton. The third was the control group. Hearing acuity was tested by the shivering audiometry. The spiral ganglion function was tested by the microphonic potentials and the integrity of cochlea was diagnosed by scanning microscopy. The results pointed out the ototoxicity of sisomycin. There were the deterioration of hearing acuity, lowering of microphonic potentials and degenerative changes in spiral ganglion. The damages were lowered by use of cavinton before the administration of sisomycin.

[Clinical evaluation of sisomicin following intravenous drip infusion in respiratory tract infections].

The efficacy, safety and utility of sisomicin (SISO) followed intravenous infusion were evaluated in 35 cases with various respiratory infections. For many cases, SISO was given at a daily dosage of 100 mg, and a single dose was infused over about 1 hour. Clinical efficacy was evaluable in 28 cases including pneumonia (14 cases), bronchitis (8 cases), bronchiectasis (4 cases), pulmonary suppuration (1 case) and pulmonary abscess plus pyothorax (1 case). Almost cases had diagnosis of serious infection associated with various diseases. Clinical efficacy was evaluated as "excellent" in 2 cases, "good" in 15 cases, "fair" in 5 cases and "poor" in 6 cases, and efficacy rate in total case was 60.7%. Efficacy rate stratified by disease was calculated as 57.1% in pneumonia, 87.5% in bronchitis, 50.0% in bronchiectasis. Responses against pulmonary suppuration or pulmonary abscess with pyothorax were little or not. Bacteriologically, organisms isolated from sputum cleared in 7 out of 15 evaluable cases, thus the responses rate was 46.7%. Adverse reaction probably due to treatment observed in 2 cases with hepatic dysfunction. Blood levels of SISO at the end of infusion were ranged from 2.1 to 6.4 micrograms/ml, and no tendency of accumulation in blood after repeated infusion was showed.

Enzymuria in aminoglycoside-induced kidney damage. Comparative study of gentamicin, amikacin, sisomicin and netilmicin.

Forty-one patients with urinary tract infections were randomly assigned to receive for six days gentamicin, amikacin, sisomicin or netilmicin. The dose for each patient was calculated according to creatinine clearance and lean body mass in order to avoid overdosages. Urinary enzymes (alpha-glucosidase, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase and muramidase), serum creatinine and creatinine clearance, proteinuria and urinary sediment were evaluated for nephrotoxicity. None of the patients developed nephrotoxicity, but urinary enzymes rose significantly in all. The statistical analysis of enzymuria during the treatment permitted the definition of a rank order of the nephrotoxic potential of the aminoglycosides studied.

The aminoglycosides. Streptomycin, kanamycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, amikacin, netilmicin, sisomicin.

Despite their toxicity, the aminoglycosides remain useful and are often the first choice in the treatment of serious infections due to gram-negative bacilli. Nephrotoxicity has restricted the indications for neomycin to topical and oral use. Emergence of resistant organisms has limited the use of streptomycin to a few specific conditions. Gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin are effective against a broad spectrum of gram-negative bacilli including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Amikacin is the aminoglycoside of choice when gentamicin resistance is prevalent.

Gentamicin and sisomicin - induced renal tubular damage.

Early signs of aminoglycoside - induced renal tubular damage were detected in 26 patients given gentamicin and 23 given sisomicin. The urinary elimination of 3 low molecular weight proteins (LMWP) - beta 2 microglobulin, retinol binding protein and lysozyme (LZM), and the urinary activity of 2 enzymes - alanine aminopeptidase and N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase - was measured before, during and after treatment. In gentamicin - treated patients LMWP elimination increased, especially LZM which rose markedly during treatment and returned to normal values after its end. Enzyme activities also rose while gentamicin was being given. Sisomicin produced smaller changes. As neither the mean serum creatinine nor the mean urinary elimination of transferrin were increased, glomerular function was probably not affected. However, tubular damage was detected, as shown by the LMWP output (especially LZM) and increased enzyme activity. Urinary LMWP and enzyme measurements are presented as sensitive and reliable methods to monitor early aminoglycoside - induced tubular impairment. It is suggested that the different renal toxicities of gentamicin and sisomicin are related to differences in their accumulation in the renal cortex.