Economic burden of skin and skin structure infections due to Gram-positive bacteria in patients on hospital at home-based outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) / Carga económica de la infección de piel y partes blandas por microorganismos grampositivos en pacientes en unidades de hospitalización a domicilio con tratamiento antimicrobiano domiciliario endovenoso (TADE)

Objective: To describe and quantify resource use and direct health costs associated with skin and skin structure infections (SSSIs) caused by Gram-positive bacteria in adults receiving outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT), administered by Hospital at Home units (HaH) in Spain. Material and method: Observational, multicenter, retrospective study. We included patients of both sexes included in the HaH-based OPAT Registry during 2011 to 2017 who were hospitalized due to SSSIs caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Resource use included home visits (nurses and physician), emergency room visits, conventional hospitalization stay, HaH stay and antibiotic treatment. Costs were quantified by multiplying the natural units of the resources by the corresponding unit cost. All costs were updated to 2019 euros. Results: We included 194 episodes in 189 patients from 24 Spanish hospitals. The most frequent main diagnoses were cellulitis (26.8%) and surgical wound infection (24.2%), and 94% of episodes resulted in clinical improvement or cure after treatment. The median HaH stay was 13 days (interquartile range [IR]:8-22.7), and the conventional hospitalization stay was 5 days (IR: 1-10.7). The mean total cost attributable to the complete infectious process was €7,326 (95% confidence interval: €6,316-€8,416). Conclusions: Our results suggest that OPAT administered by HaH is a safe and efficient alternative for the management of these infections and could lead to lower costs compared with hospital admission. (AU)

Objetivo: Describir y cuantificar el uso de recursos y costes directos sanitarios asociados con las infecciones de piel y tejidos blandos (IPPB) causadas por microorganismos grampositivos en adultos que recibieron tratamiento antimicrobiano domiciliario endovenoso (TADE), administrado en unidades de hospitalización a domicilio (HaD) en España. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional, multicéntrico, retrospectivo. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos de ambos sexos, incluidos en el Registro TADE en el periodo 2011 a 2017y cuyo motivo de ingreso fue una IPPB causada por un microorganismo Grampositivo. El uso de recursos incluyó las visitas a domicilio (enfermería y médico), visitas a urgencias, estancia en hospitalización convencional, estancia en HaD y tratamiento antibiótico. Los costes se cuantificaron multiplicando las unidades naturales de los recursos por el coste unitario correspondiente. Todos los costes fueron actualizados a euros de 2019. Resultados: Se incluyeron 194 episodios (189 pacientes) procedentes de 24 centros españoles. Los diagnósticos principales más frecuentes fueron celulitis (26,8%) e infección por herida quirúrgica (24,2%). El 94% de los episodios resultaron en una mejoría o curación clínica al finalizar el tratamiento. La mediana de la estancia en HaD fue de 13 días (rango intercuartílico [RI]:8-22,7), con una estancia previa en hospitalización convencional de 5 días (RI: 1-10,7). El coste total promedio atribuible al proceso infecciosos completo fue de 7.326€ (intervalo de confianza del 95%: 6.316€-8.416€). Conclusiones: Este estudio sugiere que el TADE administrado en HaD es una alternativa segura y eficiente para el manejo de estas infecciones y podría conducir a menores costes en comparación con el ingreso hospitalario. (AU)

The economic and health burdens of diseases caused by group A Streptococcus in New Zealand.

OBJECTIVES: In preparation for the future arrival of a group A Streptococcus (GAS) vaccine, this study estimated the economic and health burdens of GAS diseases in New Zealand (NZ). METHODS: The annual incidence of GAS diseases was based on extrapolation of the average number of primary healthcare episodes managed each year in general practices (2014-2016) and on the average number of hospitalizations occurring each year (2005-2014). Disease incidence was multiplied by the average cost of diagnosing and managing an episode of disease at each level of care to estimate the annual economic burden. RESULTS: GAS affected 1.5% of the population each year, resulting in an economic burden of 29.2 million NZ dollars (2015 prices) and inflicting a health burden of 2373 disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Children <5 years of age were the most likely age group to present for GAS-related healthcare. Presentations for superficial throat and skin infections (predominantly pharyngitis and impetigo) were more common than other GAS diseases. Cellulitis contributed the most to the total economic and health burdens. Invasive and immune-mediated diseases disproportionately contributed to the total economic and health burdens relative to their frequency of occurrence. CONCLUSION: Preventing GAS diseases would have substantial economic and health benefits in NZ and globally.

Predictors of hospital readmission in United States adults with psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed a large inpatient burden of psoriasis in the United States. Less is known about the hospital readmission for psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the patterns and predictors of hospital readmission rates for psoriasis. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2012-2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database, a representative sample of hospital readmissions in the United States. RESULTS: Among 2606 admissions for psoriasis, 216 had ≥1 readmissions for psoriasis (prevalence [95% confidence interval]: 8.3% [6.6%-10.0%]) and 918 for all-causes (35.2% [32.2%-38.3%]). The mean annual cost of first readmission for any reason was $3,500,141, with $8,357,961 for subsequent readmissions. In multivariable regression models, readmission for psoriasis was associated with ≥6 day-long index hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.82 [1.06-3.12]), teaching hospital (1.93 [1.13-3.31]), comorbid skin infection (2.13 [1.11-4.08]), and hospitalization in the autumn (4.51 [2.54-8.00]), but inversely associated with other infections (0.49 [0.26-0.92]). Readmissions for psoriasis increased from 2012 to 2014 (1.93 [1.26-2.93]). LIMITATIONS: No data on psoriasis characteristics. CONCLUSION: Inpatients with psoriasis had high rates of readmission overall but low rates of readmission for psoriasis per se. A subset of psoriasis patients was hospitalized repeatedly and responsible for most inpatients costs. Future interventions are needed to lower readmission rates among psoriasis patients.

Economic burden of cutaneous infections in children and adults with atopic dermatitis.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory disease affecting both children and adults. AD is associated with multiple comorbidities and complications. In particular, AD patients are susceptible to developing cutaneous infections. Studies show that comorbidities have contributed significantly to increased health care utilization and costs in AD. However, evidence regarding the degree to which this increased health care utilization and expenditure in AD is attributable to cutaneous infections is lacking. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of skin infections on health care utilization and expenditures among patients with atopic dermatitis. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined health care utilization and expenditures for AD patients of all ages with and without skin infections in the United States using the nationally representative 1996-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data. RESULTS: In this study, a total of 4 825 668 (weighted) patients had a diagnosis of AD (mean age 5.7). Of these, 776 753 patients (16%) experienced skin infections (mean age 4.4). Compared to AD patients without skin infections, those with skin infections had more frequent visits to ambulatory clinics (P = 0.001) and the emergency department (P = 0.011), and increased hospitalization (P = 0.010), after adjustments for demographic and clinical factors. AD patients with skin infections were also given 3.3 more prescriptions (P < 0.0001). AD patients with skin infections incurred significantly greater health care costs, which included an additional $351/patient/year for ambulatory visits (P < 0.0001) and an additional $177/patient/year for prescription medications (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Atopic dermatitis patients with cutaneous infections incurred significantly greater health care utilization and expenditures than those without cutaneous infections.

Age-based health and economic burden of skin and soft tissue infections in the United States, 2000 and 2012.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) across healthcare settings and analyze direct healthcare expenditures related to SSTIs in 2000 and 2012 in the United States. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys. Population-based incidence rates were examined for all healthcare settings that include inpatient visits, emergency department visits and ambulatory visits for SSTIs. The direct costs of healthcare services utilization were reported. Population-based prescribing rates for each antimicrobial class during ambulatory visits were compared. RESULTS: A total of 2.4 million patients experienced an SSTI in 2000 compared to 3.3 million in 2012 (40% increase). From 2000 to 2012, the incidence of patients with at least one hospital visit for SSTIs increased 22%, ambulatory care visits increased 30%, and emergency department visits increased 40%. The incidence of SSTIs in children and adolescents declined 50% (from 150 to 76 per 10,000 person; RR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.38-0.67; p<0.001) whereas SSTIs in older adults (> 65 years of age) increased almost 2-fold (from 67 to 130 per 10,000 person; RR = 1.94, 95% CI: 1.44-2.61; p<0.001). The annual incidence of SSTI in adults did not change significantly from 2000 to 2012 (from 84 to 81 per 10,000 person; RR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.71-1.31; p = 0.41). The total estimated direct healthcare costs of SSTIs increased 3-fold from $4.8 billion in 2000 to $15.0 billion in 2012, largely driven by an 8-fold increase in ambulatory expenditures for SSTIs. Total population-based antimicrobial prescription rates for SSTIs increased 4-fold from 2000 to 2012 (from 59.5 to 250.4 per 10,000 person). CONCLUSIONS: The highest healthcare utilization for SSTI treatment occurred in the ambulatory care setting and also accounted for the largest increase in overall direct expenditures from 2000 to 2012.

Potential for Cost Saving with Iclaprim Owing to Avoidance of Vancomycin-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vancomycin is the most prescribed antibiotic for hospitalized adults with skin and skin structure infections. Vancomycin is associated with acute kidney injury. Iclaprim is an antibiotic under development for the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections and is not associated with acute kidney injury. This economic model sought to determine the potential cost saving with iclaprim owing to avoidance of vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury among hospitalized patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hospital cost-minimization model was developed to estimate the overall cost impact of replacing empiric vancomycin with iclaprim among hospitalized adult patients with skin and skin structure infections. The structural model included: vancomycin acquisition; vancomycin assay; incidence of vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury; excess hospital length of stay if acute kidney injury occurred; frequency/cost of specialty physician consults after occurrence of acute kidney injury; and probability/cost of acute dialysis as a result of acute kidney injury. Iclaprim treatment duration was 7 days and iclaprim acquisition cost was varied to determine the upper end of the daily iclaprim price that still conferred cost savings relative to vancomycin. Duration of hospitalization for iclaprim was assumed to be the same as patients with no acute kidney injury. RESULTS: Based on the overall acute kidney injury rate (9.2%), the neutral acquisition price threshold for iclaprim vs. vancomycin was US$1373.47/regimen. Across various subpopulations where acute kidney injury risk ranged between 9.2 and 16.7%, the daily iclaprim acquisition cost that still conferred cost savings was up to US$300/day. CONCLUSIONS: Iclaprim has the potential to reduce the economic burden of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in hospitalized patients at risk for vancomycin-associated acute kidney injury when iclaprim acquisition is US$300/day or less.

Epidemiology, treatment, and economics of patients presenting to the emergency department for skin and soft tissue infections.

OBJECTIVES: Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are among the most common bacterial diseases and represent a significant disease burden. The purpose of this study was to describe the real-world management of patients with SSTIs presenting to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study. Adult patients identified with a primary diagnosis of SSTI determined by ICD-9 codes were assessed from index presentation for up to 30 days. Records were reviewed 30 days prior to inclusion to ensure index hospitalization was captured. For recurrent visits, a similar strategy was implemented 30 days afterward. RESULTS: Of 446 encounters screened, 357 were included; 106 (29.7%) were admitted to the hospital and 251 (70.3%) were treated outpatient. Of patients with a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score two or greater, 60.9% were treated as inpatients, whereas admission rates were 30.1% and 14.1% for patients with a CCI score of one and zero, respectively. Inpatients had an average length of stay (LOS) of 7.3 ± 7.1 days. No difference was detected in overall re-presentation to the facility 22.6% and 28.3% (p > 0.05) or in SSTI related re-presentation 10.4% and 15.1% (p > 0.05) between inpatient and outpatients. The most common gram-positive organisms identified on wound/abscess culture were MSSA (37.1% inpatients) and MRSA (66.7% outpatients). Mean total cost of care was $13,313 for inpatients and $413 for outpatients. CONCLUSION: This analysis identifies opportunities to improve processes of care for SSTIs with the aim of decreasing LOS, reducing readmissions, and ultimately decreasing burden on the healthcare system.

Factors influencing drainage setting and cost for cutaneous abscesses among pediatric patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and microbiological factors associated with skin and soft tissue infections drained in the emergency department (ED) vs operative drainage (OD) in a tertiary care children's hospital. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study among children aged 2 months to 17 years who required incision and drainage (I&D). Demographic information, signs and symptoms, abscess size and location, and wound culture/susceptibility were recorded. Patient-specific charges were collected from the billing database. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine factors determining setting for I&D and the effect of abscess drainage location on cost. RESULTS: Of 335 abscesses, 241 (71.9%) were drained in the ED. OD for abscesses was favored in children with prior history of abscess (odds ratio [OR], 3.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-7.44; P = .01) and labial location (OR, 37.81; 95% CI, 8.12-176.03; P < .001). For every 1-cm increase in size, there was approximately a 26% increase in the odds of having OD (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.11-1.44, P < .001). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was identified in 72% of the 300 abscesses cultured and 12.3% were clindamycin resistant. OD was more expensive than I&D in the ED. Per abscess that underwent I&D, OD is $3804.29 more expensive than I&D in the ED while controlling for length of stay. DISCUSSION: Clinical factors associated with OD rather than I&D in the ED included history of abscess, increased abscess length, and labial location. Microbiological factors did not differ based on I&D setting. For smaller, nonlabial abscesses, ED drainage may result in significant cost savings.

Diabetes mellitus and infection: an evaluation of hospital utilization and management costs in the United States.

AIMS: The objective of this study is to evaluate the number of diabetics that seek medical treatment in emergency departments or require hospitalization for infection management in the United States. This study also assesses the socioeconomic impact of inpatient infection management among diabetics. METHODS: We accessed the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's Nationwide Emergency Department Sample database and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to perform a retrospective analysis on diabetics presenting to the emergency department or hospitalized for infection management from 2006 to 2011. RESULTS: Emergency Department: Since 2006, nearly 10 million diabetics were annually evaluated in the emergency department. Infection was the primary reason for presentation in 10% of these visits. Among those visits, urinary tract infection was the most common infection, accounting for over 30% of emergency department encounters for infections. Other common infections included sepsis, skin and soft tissue infections, and pneumonia. Diabetics were more than twice as likely to be hospitalized for infection management than patients without diabetes. Hospitalization: Since 2006, nearly 6 million diabetics were annually hospitalized. 8-12% of these patients were hospitalized for infection management. In 2011, the inpatient care provided to patients with DM, and infection was responsible for over $48 billion dollars in aggregate hospital charges. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetics commonly present to the emergency department and require hospitalization for infection management. The care provided to diabetics for infection management has a large economic impact on the United States healthcare system. More efforts are needed to develop cost-effective strategies for the prevention of infection in patients with diabetes.

Acute surgical treatment of cutaneous abscesses: cost savings from prioritisation in theatre.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of cutaneous abscesses is an important part of the acute surgical workload and most are treated with incision and drainage. Traditionally most are treated after major cases in theatre prioritisation and remain in hospital overnight. AIM: To examine the cost saved in patients after drainage of skin abscesses according to the time of surgery ('am' versus 'pm'). METHODS: The clinical records of all patients who underwent acute incision and drainage of cutaneous abscesses at North Shore Hospital (Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand) between 1 June-31 December 2011 were reviewed with respect to the time of day when surgery was performed [am (defined as 0730-12 noon of the day of surgery)] versus pm). Costs were calculated using standard tariffs set by our hospital. RESULTS: 339 patients (median age 34 yr, 164 female) were admitted for acute drainage of cutaneous abscesses with 149 operated in "am". There was no difference in patients undergoing am versus pm drainage in terms of age, sex, race, Charlson comorbidity score or smoking status although diabetic patients were more likely to undergo a pm drainage (p=0.008). The median cost per discharge was NZ$2397.39. The cost of the 'am' group was significantly less compared to the cost of the 'pm' group with NZ$2236.63 compared to NZ$2531.70 (p=0.0034) and saved a median of NZ$295.07 per patient. This amounted to the cost of an overnight bed stay. CONCLUSIONS: Prioritisation of abscess drainage in acute theatre management is safe and associated with significant cost savings.

Increasing national burden of hospitalizations for skin and soft tissue infections in children.

BACKGROUND: The number of children requiring treatment of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) has increased since the emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. METHODS: The 2000, 2003, and 2006 Kids' Inpatient Databases were queried for patients with a primary diagnosis of SSTI. Weighted data were analyzed to estimate temporal changes in incidence, incision and drainage (I&D) rate, and economic burden. Factors associated with I&D were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Pediatric SSTI admissions increased (1) in number, (2) as a fraction of all hospital admissions, and (3) in incidence per 100,000 children from the years 2000 (17,525 ± 838; 0.65%; 23.2) to 2003 (27,463 ± 1652; 0.99%; 36.2) and 2006 (48,228 ± 2223; 1.77%; 62.7). Children younger than 3 years accounted for 49.6% of SSTI admissions in 2006, up from 32.5% in 2000. Utilization of I&D increased during the study period from 26.0% to 43.8%. Factors most associated with requiring I&D were age less than 3 years and calendar year 2006 (both P < .001). Hospital costs per patient increased over time and were higher in the group of patients who required I&D ($4296 ± $84 vs $3521 ± $81; P < .001; year 2006). Aggregate national costs reached $184.0 ± $9.4 million in 2006. CONCLUSION: The recent spike in pediatric SSTIs has disproportionately affected children younger than 3 years, and an increasing fraction of these children require I&D. The national economic burden is substantial.

[Pharmacoeconomic assessment of daptomycin as first-line therapy for bacteraemia and complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive pathogens in Spain]. / Evaluación farmacoeconómica de daptomicina como terapia de primera línea en el tratamiento de bacteriemia e infecciones complicadas de piel y tejidos blandos causadas por microorganismos grampositivos en España.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficiency of daptomycin as firstline therapy (D) versus daptomycin as salvage therapy after vancomycin (V→D ) or linezolid (L→D) failure in gram-positive bacteraemia and complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSTIs). METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis of 161 bacteraemia and 84 cSSTIs patients comparing the above mentioned therapeutic alternatives was performed using the data from 27 Spanish hospitals involved in the EUCORE study. Direct medical costs were considered. Patients were observed from the first antibiotic dose for infection until either the end of daptomycin therapy or exitus. A multivariate Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis was applied for costs (lognormal distribution) and effectiveness (normal distribution). RESULTS: In terms of effectiveness there were no statistical differences between groups but referring total costs per patient, there were significant differences. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that D dominates over L→D between 44.2%-62.1% of simulations in bacteraemia and between 48.2%-67.5% in cSSTIs. In comparison to V→D, D dominance was detected in 29.2%-33.2% of simulations in bacteraemia and between 48.2%-59.3% in cSSTIs. CONCLUSIONS: Daptomycin as first-line therapy dominates over daptomycin as salvage therapy after linezolid failure both in bacteraemia and cSSTIs. Comparing daptomycin as first-line therapy with its use after vancomycin failure, in cSSTIs the former is dominant. In bacteremia daptomycin as first line therapy is as effective as daptomycin as salvage therapy after vancomycin failure and implies lower costs.

Evaluación farmacoeconómica de daptomicina como terapia de primera línea en el tratamiento de bacteriemia e infecciones complicadas de piel y tejidos blandos causadas por microorganismos grampositivos en España / Pharmacoeconomic assessment of daptomycin as first-line therapy for bacteraemia and complicated skin and skin structure infections caused by gram-positive pathogens in Spain

Objetivo: Evaluar la eficiencia de daptomicina como tratamiento de primera línea (D) frente a su uso como tratamiento de rescate tras fallo con vancomicina (V→D) o linezolid (L→D) en la terapia de bacteriemia e infecciones complicadas de piel y tejidos blandos (IcPTB) causadas por microorganismos grampositivos. Métodos: Análisis coste-efectividad de 161 pacientes con bacteriemia y 84 IcPTB procedentes de 27 hospitales españoles participantes en el estudio observacional, multicéntrico, retrospectivo EUCORE. Los costes directos médicos se registraron desde la primera dosis de tratamiento hasta su finalización o exitus. Se aplicó un análisis probabilístico de Monte Carlo para costes (distribución log-normal) y efectividad (distribución normal). Resultados: No se encontraron diferencias significativas en la efectividad de las distintas alternativas pero sí en los costes totales por paciente. En el análisis de sensibilidad, se confirmó que en bacteriemia e IcPTB la alternativa D fue dominante sobre L→D entre el 44,2% - 62,1% y del 48,2 - 67,5%, respectivamente. Respecto a D vs V→D, en bacteriemia la alternativa D fue dominante entre el 29,2% - 33,2% de las simulaciones y en IcPTB entre 48,2% - 59,3%. Conclusiones: Daptomicina como tratamiento de primera línea es la alternativa dominante sobre daptomicina como terapia de rescate tras fracaso de linezolid tanto en bacteriemia como en IcPTB. Daptomicina también es la alternativa dominante en IcPTB como tratamiento de primera línea sobre daptomicina como rescate tras el fallo de vancomicina, mientras que en bacteremia su uso en primera línea es similar en efectividad e implica costes menores (AU)

Objective: To assess the efficiency of daptomycin as firstline therapy (D) versus daptomycin as salvage therapy after vancomycin (V→D ) or linezolid (L→D) failure in gram-positive bacteraemia and complicated skin and skin-structure infections (cSSTIs). Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis of 161 bacteraemia and 84 cSSTIs patients comparing the above mentioned therapeutic alternatives was performed using the data from 27 Spanish hospitals involved in the EUCORE study. Direct medical costs were considered. Patients were observed from the first antibiotic dose for infection until either the end of daptomycin therapy or exitus. A multivariate Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis was applied for costs (lognormal distribution) and effectiveness (normal distribution). Results: In terms of effectiveness there were no statistical differences between groups but referring total costs per patient, there were significant differences. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that D dominates over L→D between 44.2%-62.1% of simulations in bacteraemia and between 48.2%-67.5% in cSSTIs. In comparison to V→D, D dominance was detected in 29.2%-33.2% of simulations in bacteraemia and between 48.2%-59.3% in cSSTIs. Conclusions: Daptomycin as first-line therapy dominates over daptomycin as salvage therapy after linezolid failure both in bacteraemia and cSSTIs. Comparing daptomycin as first-line therapy with its use after vancomycin failure, in cSSTIs the former is dominant. In bacteremia daptomycin as first line therapy is as effective as daptomycin as salvage therapy after vancomycin failure and implies lower costs(AU)

[Clinical and economic analysis of an internal medicine-infectious disease department at a university general hospital (2005-2006)]. / Valoración clinicoeconómica de un servicio de medicina interna-infecciosas en un hospital general universitario (2005-6).

OBJECTIVES: Comparative study in patients with infectious diseases admitted to a specialized Internal Medicine-Infectious Diseases Department (IMID) versus those admitted to other medical departments in a university general hospital, investigating quality and cost-effectiveness. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Analysis of patients in 10 principle diagnosis-related groups (DRGs) of infectious diseases admitted to the IMID were compared to those admitted to other medical departments (2005-2006). The DRG were divided in 4 main groups: respiratory infections (DGR 88, 89, 90, 540), urinary infections (DRG 320, 321), sepsis (DRG 416, 584), and skin infections (DRG 277, 278). For each group, quality variables (mortality and readmission rate), efficacy variables (mean hospital stay and mean DRG-based cost per patient) and complexity variables (case mix, relative weight, and functional index) were analyzed. RESULTS: 542 patients included in the 10 main infectious disease DRGs were admitted to IMID and 2404 to other medical departments. After adjusting for DRG case mix (case mix 0.99 for IMID and 0.89 for others), mean hospital stay (5.11 days vs. 7.65 days), mortality (3.5% vs. 7.9%) and mean DRG-based economic cost per patient (1521euro/patient vs. 2952euro/patient) was significantly lower in the group of patients hospitalized in IMID than the group in other medical departments (p<0.05). The readmission rate was similar in the 2 groups (5.5% and 6.5%, respectively). The results per each DRG group were similar to the overall results. CONCLUSIONS: For a similar case mix, hospitalization in IMID departments had a positive influence on the variables analyzed as compared to hospitalization in other departments, with a shorter mean stay, lower mortality, and lower mean DRG-based economic cost per patient. Creation and development of IMID departments should be an essential objective to improve healthcare quality and respond to social demands.

Daptomycin versus vancomycin for complicated skin and skin structure infections: clinical and economic outcomes.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of daptomycin compared with vancomycin on the clinical and economic outcomes in patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections. DESIGN: Prospective, open-label study. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center in Detroit, Michigan. PATIENTS: Fifty-three adult patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections at risk for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection who were treated with daptomycin and a matched cohort of 212 patients treated with vancomycin. INTERVENTION: Patients in the prospective arm received intravenous daptomycin 4 mg/kg every 24 hours for at least 3 days but not more than 14 days. Historical controls received at least 3 days of vancomycin dosed to achieve trough concentrations of 5-20 microg/ml. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Outcomes evaluated included blinded assessments of clinical resolution, duration of therapy, and costs. The most common diagnoses were cellulitis (31%), abscess (22%), and both cellulitis with abscess (37%). Microbiology differed significantly between groups, with S. aureus found in 27 patients (51%) in the daptomycin group and 167 patients (79%) in the vancomycin group and MRSA in 22 (42%) and 159 (75%), respectively (p<0.001). The proportions of patients with clinical improvement or resolution of their infections on days 3 and 5 were 90% versus 70% and 98% versus 81% in the daptomycin versus vancomycin groups, respectively (p<0.01 for both comparisons), and 100% at the end of therapy in both groups. Among patients with complete resolution of their infections (41 patients [77%] with daptomycin vs 89 patients [42%] with vancomycin, p<0.05), median duration of intravenous therapy was 4 and 7 days, respectively, (p<0.001), and hospital costs were $5027 and $7552 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving daptomycin achieved more rapid resolution of symptoms and clinical cure and had a decreased duration of inpatient therapy compared with those receiving vancomycin. This study suggests that daptomycin is a cost-effective alternative to vancomycin for complicated skin and skin structure infections.

Impact of linezolid on economic outcomes and determinants of cost in a clinical trial evaluating patients with MRSA complicated skin and soft-tissue infections.

BACKGROUND: In clinical trials, linezolid has demonstrated higher clinical cure rates and shorter hospital duration for patients than has vancomycin for the treatment of complicated skin and soft-tissue infections (cSSTIs). OBJECTIVE: To assess economic outcomes of linezolid versus vancomycin and evaluate determinants of treatment costs for cSSTIs. METHODS: Economic data were obtained from US subjects enrolled in a multinational, open-label, clinical trial of cSSTIs caused by suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Subjects were randomized to receive intravenous or oral linezolid or intravenous vancomycin for 7-21 days. Costs for each patient were evaluated by applying nationally representative per diem hospital costs by hospital ward. Intravenous administration costs were applied to the duration of intravenous treatment. Factors contributing to the cost of therapy were evaluated using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Seven hundred seventeen US patients were included in the study. Demographics were similar between treatment groups. Length of stay and duration of intravenous therapy were shorter for linezolid-treated patients. Mean +/- SD cost for intent-to-treat population patients treated with linezolid versus vancomycin was 4865 US dollars +/- 4367 versus 5738 US dollars +/- 5190, respectively (p = 0.017), and in the MRSA population was 4881 US dollars +/- 3987 versus 6006 US dollars +/- 5039, respectively (p = 0.041). Factors significantly associated with increased cost included vancomycin therapy, age, and comorbidities, including diabetes. After adjusting for all other factors, treatment with linezolid was associated with significantly lower treatment costs compared with vancomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid therapy was associated with improved clinical outcomes and significantly lower treatment costs than was vancomycin. The largest cost advantage was demonstrated in patients with documented MRSA cSSTIs.

Cost reduction after introduction of a multidisciplinary infectious disease service at a German university hospital.

BACKGROUND: In 1997 an infectious disease service (IDS) similar to those in the US was established at a university hospital in Munich, Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed the economic impact of the new policy by performing a cost comparison analysis. Inpatients with pneumonia, skin infections/cellulitis, urinary tract infections (UTI) and bacteremia/sepsis were assigned to two groups: patients from a 6-month period after the establishment of the IDS (post-IDS group) were compared with similar patients before the implementation of the ID-service (pre-IDS group). Costs of microbiological investigation (MB), antibiotic treatment (AB), clinical imaging (CI), total costs and length of antibiotic therapy were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with UTIs in the post-IDS group had 39% fewer MBs (p<0.05) than patients in the pre-IDS group, resulting in a 33% decrease in average MB costs (p<0.05). In the total group, in which subgroups with pneumonia, skin infection and UTI were summarized, the post-IDS group had 37% fewer MBs (p<0.05) resulting in MB cost reductions of 34% (p<0.05). There were no significant differences in expenditures for AB and CI and in the average length of antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: This study shows that continuous consultation by an IDS does not increase diagnostic and treatment costs, but results in significant cost reductions.

The financial and production impacts of bovine dermatophilosis in Zambia.

During October to December 1986, 365 traditional cattle herds in four provinces in Zambia were inspected and the owners interviewed. Information was collected on the treatment, management and disposal of cases of bovine dermatophilosis and on the effects of this disease on productivity for 1985. The contemporary financial cost per case of treatment and/or premature disposal, slaughter or death to the owners was K. 202 (US$91). The cost due to draft oxen being affected was estimated at K. 428 (US$193) per affected ox. The cost of reduced milk production, replacing affected cows and calf deaths, directly or indirectly from bovine dermatophilosis, was estimated at K. 132 (US$78) per affected milking cow. The total annual national cost of bovine dermatophilosis in 1985 was conservatively estimated to be some K. 6.9 million, (US$3 million). There were indications that the true financial cost in 1985 may have been up to 1.8 times the estimated cost.