Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 7.437
Filter
1.
Vaccine ; 42(16): 3578-3584, 2024 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704259

ABSTRACT

The smallpox vaccine developed by Jenner in 1798 was successfully introduced in France in 1800 with the support of Napoleon Bonaparte. The medals and tokens (coin-like medals) issued to encourage early-day vaccination activities are described in the context of the changing political situation in that country. In 1800 a private society of subscribers, led by the Duke of La Rochefoucauld-Liancourt was created, along with a Vaccine Committee charged with evaluating the safety and efficacy of vaccination before deciding if vaccination should be extended to the entire population. The Vaccine Committee published a positive report in 1803, and in 1804, the Ministry of the Interior established the "Society for the extinction of smallpox in France by means of the propagation of the vaccine". The creation of the Society made smallpox vaccination an official activity of the empire, facilitating collaboration between government agencies. The vaccine institution, established by Napoleon in 1804, continued its functions until 1820 when the Royal Academy of Medicine was created and took over those functions. This case exemplifies the collaboration that was needed between science and politics to rapidly bring the recently developed smallpox vaccine to the needed population.


Subject(s)
Smallpox Vaccine , Smallpox , Vaccination , Smallpox Vaccine/history , France , Humans , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/history , History, 19th Century , History, 18th Century , Vaccination/history
2.
Emerg Microbes Infect ; 13(1): 2356153, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767199

ABSTRACT

Men who have sex with men and people living with HIV are disproportionately affected in the 2022 multi-country monkeypox epidemic. The smallpox vaccine can induce cross-reactive antibodies against the monkeypox virus (MPXV) and reduce the risk of infection. Data on antibodies against MPXV induced by historic smallpox vaccination in people with HIV are scarce. In this observational study, plasma samples were collected from people living with and without HIV in Shenzhen, China. We measured antibodies binding to two representative proteins of vaccinia virus (VACV; A27L and A33R) and homologous proteins of MPXV (A29L and A35R) using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We compared the levels of these antibodies between people living with and without HIV. Stratified analyses were performed based on the year of birth of 1981 when the smallpox vaccination was stopped in China. Plasma samples from 677 people living with HIV and 746 people without HIV were tested. A consistent pattern was identified among the four antibodies, regardless of HIV status. VACV antigen-reactive and MPXV antigen-reactive antibodies induced by historic smallpox vaccination were detectable in the people born before 1981, and antibody levels reached a nadir during or after 1981. The levels of smallpox vaccine-induced antibodies were comparable between people living with HIV and those without HIV. Our findings suggest that the antibody levels against MPXV decreased in both people living with and without HIV due to the cessation of smallpox vaccination.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , HIV Infections , Monkeypox virus , Smallpox Vaccine , Humans , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Male , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/administration & dosage , HIV Infections/immunology , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/virology , Adult , Female , China/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Smallpox/immunology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/epidemiology , Smallpox/history , Vaccination , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/history , Cross Reactions/immunology , Young Adult , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Vaccinia virus/immunology
3.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 139-149, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801576

ABSTRACT

Variola virus is an anthroponotic agent that belongs to the orthopoxvirus family. It is an etiological agent of smallpox, an ancient disease that caused massive mortality of human populations. Twentieth century has witnessed the death of about 300 million people due to the unavailability of an effective vaccine. Early detection is the primary strategy to prevent an outbreak of smallpox. Variola virus forms the characteristic pus-filled pustules and centrifugal rash distribution in the infected patients while transmission occurs mainly through respiratory droplets during the early stage of infection. No antiviral drugs are approved for variola virus till date. Generation of first-generation vaccines helped in the eradication of smallpox which was declared by the World Health Organization.


Subject(s)
Smallpox , Variola virus , Humans , Variola virus/pathogenicity , Variola virus/genetics , Variola virus/physiology , Smallpox/virology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/transmission , Animals , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control
4.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 239-252, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801582

ABSTRACT

Although WHO-led global efforts led to eradication of smallpox over four decades ago, other poxviruses, especially monkeypox, have re-emerged to occupy the ecological niche vacated by smallpox. Many of these viruses produce similar lesions thus mandating a prompt laboratory confirmation. There has been considerable evolution in the techniques available to diagnose these infections and differentiate between them. With the 2022 multi-country outbreak of monkeypox, significant efforts were made to apprise the laboratory diagnosis of the virus and numerous real-time-PCR-based assays were made commercially available. This chapter discusses the sample collection and biosafety aspects along with the repertoire of diagnostic modalities, both traditional and emerging, for poxviruses which a special focus on monkeypox. The advantages and disadvantages of each technique have been illustrated. We have also reflected upon the newer advances and the existing lacunae.


Subject(s)
Poxviridae Infections , Humans , Poxviridae Infections/diagnosis , Poxviridae Infections/virology , Poxviridae/genetics , Poxviridae/isolation & purification , Animals , Smallpox/diagnosis , Smallpox/virology , Smallpox/epidemiology , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Mpox (monkeypox)/diagnosis , Mpox (monkeypox)/virology , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology
5.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 183-204, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801579

ABSTRACT

Poxviridae family includes several viruses that infecting humans usually causes skin lesions only, but in some cases their clinical course is complicated by viral pneumonia (with or without bacterial superinfections). Historically variola virus has been the poxviridae most frequently associated with the development of pneumonia with many large outbreaks worldwide before its eradication in 1980. It is still considered a biological threat for its potential in biological warfare and bioterrorism. Smallpox pneumonia can be severe with the onset of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and death. Vaccinia virus, used for vaccination against smallpox exceptionally, in immunocompromised patients, can induce generalized (with also lung involvement) severe disease after vaccination. MPXV virus occasionally can cause pneumonia particularly in immunocompromised patients. The pathophysiology of poxviridae pneumonia is still an area of active research; however, in animal models these viruses can cause both direct damage to the lower airways epithelium and a hyperinflammatory syndrome, like a cytokine storm. Multiple mechanisms of immune evasion have also been described. The treatment of poxviridae pneumonia is mainly based on careful supportive care. Despite the absence of randomized clinical trials in patients with poxviridae pneumonia there are antiviral drugs, such as tecovirimat, cidofovir and brincidofovir, FDA-approved for use in smallpox and also available under an expanded access protocol for treatment of MPXV. There are 2 (replication-deficient modified vaccinia Ankara and replication-competent vaccinia virus) smallpox vaccines FDA-approved with the first one also approved for prevention of MPXV in adults that are at high risk of infection.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Poxviridae Infections , Humans , Animals , Poxviridae Infections/drug therapy , Poxviridae Infections/virology , Poxviridae Infections/immunology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Poxviridae/pathogenicity , Poxviridae/physiology , Poxviridae/genetics , Vaccinia virus/pathogenicity , Vaccinia virus/physiology , Smallpox/virology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Variola virus/pathogenicity , Variola virus/genetics
6.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 273-287, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801584

ABSTRACT

Smallpox was a significant cause of mortality for over three thousand years, amounting to 10% of deaths yearly. Edward Jenner discovered smallpox vaccination in 1796, which rapidly became a smallpox infection preventive practice throughout the world and eradicated smallpox infection by 1980. After smallpox eradication, monkeypox vaccines have been used primarily in research and in outbreaks in Africa, where the disease is endemic. In the present, the vaccines are being used for people who work with animals or in high-risk areas, as well as for healthcare workers treating patients with monkeypox. Among all orthopoxviruses (OPXV), monkeypox viral (MPXV) infection occurs mainly in cynomolgus monkeys, natural reservoirs, and occasionally causes severe multi-organ infection in humans, who were the incidental hosts. The first case of the present epidemic of MXPV was identified on May 7, 2022, and rapidly increased the number of cases. In this regard, the WHO declared the outbreak, an international public health emergency on July 23, 2022. The first monkeypox vaccine was developed in the 1960s by the US Army and was based on the vaccinia virus, which is also used in smallpox vaccines. In recent years, newer monkeypox vaccines have been developed based on other viruses such as Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA). These newer vaccines are safer and can provide longer-lasting immunity with fewer side effects. For the future, there is ongoing research to improve the current vaccines and to develop new ones. One notable advance has been the development of a recombinant vaccine that uses a genetically modified vaccinia virus to express monkeypox antigens. This vaccine has shown promising results in pre-clinical trials and is currently undergoing further testing in clinical trials. Another recent development has been the use of a DNA vaccine, which delivers genetic material encoding monkeypox antigens directly into cells. This type of vaccine has shown effectiveness in animal studies and is also undergoing clinical testing in humans. Overall, these recent advances in monkeypox vaccine development hold promise for protecting individuals against this potentially serious disease.


Subject(s)
Smallpox Vaccine , Humans , Animals , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/immunology , Smallpox/epidemiology , Smallpox/history , History, 21st Century , History, 20th Century , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Poxviridae Infections/prevention & control , Poxviridae Infections/immunology , Poxviridae Infections/epidemiology , Poxviridae/immunology , Poxviridae/genetics , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Monkeypox virus/genetics , Vaccination , Viral Vaccines/immunology , Vaccine Development
7.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 301-316, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801586

ABSTRACT

The smallpox infection with the variola virus was one of the most fatal disorders until a global eradication was initiated in the twentieth century. The last cases were reported in Somalia 1977 and as a laboratory infection in the UK 1978; in 1980, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared smallpox for extinct. The smallpox virus with its very high transmissibility and mortality is still a major biothreat, because the vaccination against smallpox was stopped globally in the 1980s. For this reason, new antivirals (cidofovir, brincidofovir, and tecovirimat) and new vaccines (ACAM2000, LC16m8 and Modified Vaccine Ankara MVA) were developed. For passive immunization, vaccinia immune globulin intravenous (VIGIV) is available. Due to the relationships between orthopox viruses such as vaccinia, variola, mpox (monkeypox), cowpox, and horsepox, the vaccines (LC16m8 and MVA) and antivirals (brincidofovir and tecovirimat) could also be used in the mpox outbreak with positive preliminary data. As mutations can result in drug resistance against cidofovir or tecovirimat, there is need for further research. Further antivirals (NIOCH-14 and ST-357) and vaccines (VACΔ6 and TNX-801) are being developed in Russia and the USA. In conclusion, further research for treatment and prevention of orthopox infections is needed and is already in progress. After a brief introduction, this chapter presents the smallpox and mpox disease and thereafter full overviews on antiviral treatment and vaccination including the passive immunization with vaccinia immunoglobulins.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents , Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Smallpox , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/epidemiology , Smallpox/immunology , Smallpox/history , Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Smallpox Vaccine/therapeutic use , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/prevention & control , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology , Vaccination/methods , Variola virus/immunology , Variola virus/genetics , Animals , Cytosine/analogs & derivatives , Cytosine/therapeutic use , Monkeypox virus/immunology , Monkeypox virus/pathogenicity , Monkeypox virus/genetics , Immunization, Passive/methods , Organophosphonates/therapeutic use , Isoindoles/therapeutic use , Cidofovir/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Benzamides , Phthalimides
8.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1451: 399-412, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801593

ABSTRACT

Historically, biological agents have been used to target various populations. One of the earliest examples could be the catastrophic effect of smallpox in Australia in the eighteenth century (as alleged by some historians). Modern biological techniques can be used to both create or provide protection against various agents of biological warfare. Any microorganism (viruses, bacteria, and fungi) or its toxins can be used as biological agents. Minnesota Department of Health has listed Smallpox (variola major) as a category A bioterrorism agent, even though it has been eradicated in 1980 through an extensive vaccination campaign. Category A agents are considered the highest risk to public health. Laboratory-associated outbreaks of poxviruses could cause unprecedented occupational hazards. Only two WHO-approved BSL-4 facilities in the United States and Russia are allowed to perform research on the variola virus. So, poxviruses present themselves as a classical case of a dual-use dilemma, since research with them can be used for both beneficial and harmful purposes. Although the importance of ethics in scientific research requires no further elaboration, ethical norms assume greater significance during experimentation with poxviruses. In this chapter, we will update the readers on the sensitive nature of conducting research with poxviruses, and how these viruses can be a source of potential biological weapons. Finally, specified ethical guidelines are explored to ensure safe research practices in virology.


Subject(s)
Biological Warfare Agents , Biological Warfare , Humans , Biological Warfare Agents/ethics , Biological Warfare/ethics , Poxviridae/genetics , Bioterrorism/ethics , Bioterrorism/prevention & control , Animals , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/virology , Poxviridae Infections/virology , Poxviridae Infections/prevention & control , Biomedical Research/ethics
9.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(6): e0046524, 2024 Jun 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700327

ABSTRACT

Smallpox is a highly contagious human disease caused by the variola virus. Although the disease was eliminated in 1979 due to its highly contagious nature and historical pathogenicity, with a mortality rate of up to 30%, this virus is an important candidate for biological weapons. Currently, vaccines are the critical measures to prevent this virus infection and spread. In this study, we designed a peptide vaccine using immunoinformatics tools, which have the potential to activate human immunity against variola virus infection efficiently. The design of peptides derives from vaccine-candidate proteins showing protective potential in vaccinia WR strains. Potential non-toxic and nonallergenic T-cell and B-cell binding and cytokine-inducing epitopes were then screened through a priority prediction using special linkers to connect B-cell epitopes and T-cell epitopes, and an appropriate adjuvant was added to the vaccine construction to enhance the immunogenicity of the peptide vaccine. The 3D structure display, docking, and free energy calculation analysis indicate that the binding affinity between the vaccine peptide and Toll-like receptor 3 is high, and the vaccine receptor complex is highly stable. Notably, the vaccine we designed is obtained from the protective protein of the vaccinia and combined with preventive measures to avoid side effects. This vaccine is highly likely to produce an effective and safe immune response against the variola virus infection in the body. IMPORTANCE: In this work, we designed a vaccine with a cluster of multiple T-cell/B-cell epitopes, which should be effective in inducing systematic immune responses against variola virus infection. Besides, this work also provides a reference in vaccine design for preventing monkeypox virus infection, which is currently prevalent.


Subject(s)
Computational Biology , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte , Smallpox Vaccine , Smallpox , Vaccines, Subunit , Variola virus , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte/immunology , Epitopes, B-Lymphocyte/chemistry , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/immunology , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/chemistry , Epitopes, T-Lymphocyte/genetics , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/chemistry , Vaccines, Subunit/genetics , Humans , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , Variola virus/immunology , Variola virus/genetics , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Molecular Docking Simulation , Peptides/immunology , Peptides/chemistry , Immunoinformatics
10.
Washington, D.C.; OPAS; 2024-05-03. (OPAS/CIM/23-0010).
Non-conventional in Portuguese | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-59559

ABSTRACT

A erradicação da varíola humana (mpox em inglês) foi certificada em 1980. A varíola símia (mpox em inglês) é endêmica nos países da África Central e Ocidental desde a sua primeira detecção, em 1958. Trata-se de uma zoonose cujos casos geralmente ocorrem perto de florestas tropicais, onde diversos animais são portadores do ortopoxvírus causador da doença. A maioria das infecções em seres humanos pelo vírus da varíola símia em países onde a doença é endêmica é resultado de transmissão primária de animais para humanos. A transmissão de pessoa a pessoa pode ocorrer por meio de contato próximo com secreções respiratórias ou lesões cutâneas de uma pessoa infectada ou com objetos recém-contaminados. A transmissão também pode ocorrer através da placenta da mãe para o feto ou por contato direto durante ou após o parto. Até 21 de maio de 2022, 12 países onde não há varíola símia endêmica, em 2 regiões da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS), haviam notificado 92 casos confirmados da doença. Até 26 de agosto de 2022, 96 países sem endemicidade, de todas as 6 regiões da OMS, haviam notificado 45.198 casos confirmados de varíola símia, incluindo 6 óbitos. No mesmo período, os países onde a doença é endêmica notificaram 350 casos confirmados e 6 óbitos. Na Região das Américas, 29 países e territórios notificaram 23.479 (48%) casos confirmados e 3 óbitos. Diversos estudos observacionais sobre as vacinas de primeira geração demonstraram que a eficácia da vacinação contra a varíola humana na prevenção da varíola símia é de aproximadamente 85%. Atualmente, as vacinas originais (de primeira geração) contra a varíola humana não estão mais disponíveis.


Subject(s)
Vaccines , Disease Transmission, Infectious , Smallpox , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases
11.
Nat Commun ; 15(1): 3265, 2024 Apr 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627363

ABSTRACT

The eradication of smallpox was officially declared by the WHO in 1980, leading to discontinuation of the vaccination campaign against the virus. Consequently, immunity against smallpox and related orthopoxviruses like Monkeypox virus gradually declines, highlighting the need for efficient countermeasures not only for the prevention, but also for the treatment of already exposed individuals. We have recently developed human-like monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from vaccinia virus-immunized non-human primates. Two mAbs, MV33 and EV42, targeting the two infectious forms of the virus, were selected for in vivo evaluation, based on their in vitro neutralization potency. A single dose of either MV33 or EV42 administered three days post-infection (dpi) to BALB/c female mice provides full protection against lethal ectromelia virus challenge. Importantly, a combination of both mAbs confers full protection even when provided five dpi. Whole-body bioimaging and viral load analysis reveal that combination of the two mAbs allows for faster and more efficient clearance of the virus from target organs compared to either MV33 or EV42 separately. The combined mAbs treatment further confers post-exposure protection against the currently circulating Monkeypox virus in Cast/EiJ female mice, highlighting their therapeutic potential against other orthopoxviruses.


Subject(s)
Orthopoxvirus , Poxviridae Infections , Smallpox , Vaccinia , Humans , Female , Animals , Mice , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Poxviridae Infections/prevention & control , Vaccinia virus , Antibodies, Viral
16.
Viruses ; 16(4)2024 04 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38675961

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To evaluate whether antibodies specific for the vaccinia virus (VV) are still detectable after at least 45 years from immunization. To confirm that VV-specific antibodies are endowed with the capacity to neutralize Mpox virus (MPXV) in vitro. To test a possible role of polyclonal non-specific activation in the maintenance of immunologic memory. METHODS: Sera were collected from the following groups: smallpox-vaccinated individuals with or without latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), unvaccinated donors, and convalescent individuals after MPXV infection. Supernatant of VV- or MPXV-infected Vero cells were inactivated and used as antigens in ELISA or in Western blot (WB) analyses. An MPXV plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) was optimized and performed on study samples. VV- and PPD-specific memory T cells were measured by flow cytometry. RESULTS: None of the smallpox unvaccinated donors tested positive in ELISA or WB analysis and their sera were unable to neutralize MPXV in vitro. Sera from all the individuals convalescing from an MPXV infection tested positive for anti-VV or MPXV IgG with high titers and showed MPXV in vitro neutralization capacity. Sera from most of the vaccinated individuals showed IgG anti-VV and anti-MPXV at high titers. WB analyses showed that positive sera from vaccinated or convalescent individuals recognized both VV and MPXV antigens. Higher VV-specific IgG titer and specific T cells were observed in LTBI individuals. CONCLUSIONS: ELISA and WB performed using supernatant of VV- or MPXV-infected cells are suitable to identify individuals vaccinated against smallpox at more than 45 years from immunization and individuals convalescing from a recent MPXV infection. ELISA and WB results show a good correlation with PRNT. Data confirm that a smallpox vaccination induces a long-lasting memory in terms of specific IgG and that antibodies raised against VV may neutralize MPXV in vitro. Finally, higher titers of VV-specific antibodies and higher frequency of VV-specific memory T cells in LTBI individuals suggest a role of polyclonal non-specific activation in the maintenance of immunologic memory.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , B-Lymphocytes , Cross Reactions , Smallpox Vaccine , Vaccinia virus , Humans , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Smallpox Vaccine/immunology , B-Lymphocytes/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Neutralizing/blood , Cross Reactions/immunology , Vaccinia virus/immunology , Middle Aged , Immunologic Memory , Neutralization Tests , Smallpox/immunology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Animals , Male , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Female , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Orthopoxvirus/immunology , Vaccination , Chlorocebus aethiops , Adult , Lymphocyte Activation , Vero Cells
17.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(6): 956-960, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38608456

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: After the eradication of smallpox, there have been no specific public health measures for any Orthopoxviruses (OPXVs). Therefore, it is necessary to countermeasure OPXV infections after Mpox (formerly monkeypox) occurrences, such as the latest global outbreak in 2022-2023. This study aimed to provide crucial insights for the development of effective public health policy making against mpox in populations residing in regions where the virus is not prevalent. METHODS: This study used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to examine smallpox and mpox antibodies in Koreans with three different age groups. We analyzed 56 sera obtained from a tertiary care hospital in South Korea between September 2022 and April 2023. Plasma levels of antibodies against the viral proteins of smallpox (variola cytokine response-modifying protein B) and MPXV (A29) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. RESULTS: Plasma samples from participants in their early 40 s and older exhibited higher reactivity to viral antigens than those from younger participants. Furthermore, there was a strong positive correlation in antibody positivity for the two different viruses across the sera. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of low antibody levels in participants ˂40 years may hinder their ability to defend against OPXV. Therefore, it is imperative to implement effective public health measures to mitigate the transmission of OPXV within the community. These findings serve as fundamental information for devising strategies to combat mpox efficiently, particularly in regions where the virus is not prevalent.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Orthopoxvirus , Humans , Adult , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Female , Orthopoxvirus/immunology , Age Factors , Public Health , Aged , Adolescent , Antibody Formation , Smallpox/prevention & control , Smallpox/immunology , Poxviridae Infections/immunology , Poxviridae Infections/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Mpox (monkeypox)/immunology
18.
AIDS ; 38(5): 768-771, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38482909

ABSTRACT

Due to the start of the monkeypox epidemic in 2022, we retrospectively analyzed the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported in France after monkeypox vaccinations with the third-generation smallpox vaccine. Ninety-eight cases, representing 172 ADRs, were reported. ADRs were mostly expected reactogenicity reactions occurring within days after the first dose of vaccine and having a quick favorable outcome. Unexpected facial palsy and vaccination failure are discussed.


Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox Vaccine , Smallpox , Humans , Smallpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Mpox (monkeypox)/epidemiology , Smallpox/epidemiology , Smallpox/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , Vaccination/adverse effects , France/epidemiology
19.
Glob Public Health ; 19(1): 2326011, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38471037

ABSTRACT

Certification is an essential stage in disease eradication efforts, encompassing epidemiological, managerial, and political complexities. The certification of smallpox eradication in the People's Republic of China (PRC, or China) exemplifies the multifaceted nature of the certification. Despite eradicating smallpox in the early 1960s, before the Global Smallpox Eradication Programme (SEP) intensified in 1967, China was one of the last countries certified as smallpox-free by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 1979. The WHO encountered notable resistance during the certification of smallpox eradication in China. This article examines the underlying motivations propelling China's resistance, the factors that contributed to the shifts in its stance, the challenges navigated by the WHO, and the ultimate achievement of certification despite controversies surrounding its transparency and credibility. Through the case of the certification of smallpox eradication, the article provides a historical context of China's selective engagement in global health governance, emphasising the critical importance of building a trusting relationship between the WHO and its member states. It offers insights for fostering effective collaboration among diverse stakeholders driven by varied political agendas in addressing shared global health challenges such as the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.


Subject(s)
Smallpox , Humans , Global Health , World Health Organization , Disease Eradication , Certification , China
20.
Eval Program Plann ; 103: 102414, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38452410

ABSTRACT

Brazil ranked third in the number of Monkeypox infected worldwide in early September 2022 and eighth in multiple deaths. Brazilian Ministry of Health prepared a public policy to face the smallpox outbreak. This paper aims to analyze the governmental public policy' impacts on Monkeypox using survival analysis. The information in the database was collected from epidemiological bulletins on the official websites of the Brazilian Ministry of Health and the World Health Organization (WHO). The survival analysis with parametric statistical analysis, semiparametric with Cox regression, and nonparametric analysis were used. The inference of causality was perceived by the impact caused by the national public policy with the proportional reduction in the number of cases in the treatment group (Chi-sq = 117.783, p < 0.001), contrary to what was perceived in the control group, as well as survival about the time of the states that elaborated their plans based on what was made available by the government. The need to evaluate government projects should be within the scope of project management in Brazilian states and provide for more assertive decision-making in the fight against smallpox.


Subject(s)
Mpox (monkeypox) , Smallpox , Humans , Brazil , Smallpox/prevention & control , Program Evaluation , Public Policy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...