Return on Investment Analysis of Health Experts onLine at Portsmouth: A 2-Year Review of the Navy's Newest Teleconsultation System.

BACKGROUND: Health Experts onLine at Portsmouth (HELP) is a web-based teleconsultation system launched in June 2014 to facilitate communication between specialists at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth and providers assigned to both the fleet forces and primary care clinics across the eastern United States, Europe, and the Middle East. Specialist consultations through the HELP system purport to improve access to care for patients who otherwise might be referred to the civilian network or medically evacuated (MEDEVACed) to Naval Medical Center Portsmouth for specialized care. If HELP-facilitated communications help avoid civilian referrals or MEDEVACs, the associated costs of that care should be reduced. METHODS: We evaluated cost savings associated with prevented MEDEVACs by analyzing both tangible savings (prevented costs of flights, per diems, and consults) and intangible savings (reduced lost productivity time). We compared these savings to the costs of maintaining and utilizing the HELP system: startup costs, administrative costs, and provider time costs. We used patient and provider data from the HELP database to evaluate clinical consult cases. Before this analysis, a panel of 3 physicians associated with HELP reviewed each consult to determine whether a case qualified as a prevented MEDEVAC. Data from the Military Health System (MHS) Management and Analysis Reporting Tool and the MHS Data Repository were used to estimate costs associated with provider time, patient time, and direct care medical encounters. FINDINGS: The HELP program delivered measurable, positive returns on investment (ROIs) between June 2014 and December 2015. In that time frame, 559 consult cases occurred in the HELP system. Of the 559 total consult cases, 50 consults prevented MEDEVACs. Incorporating only tangible savings, HELP produced an 80% ROI on the basis of prevented medical evacuations; the addition of intangible savings such as reduced lost productivity increased the ROI to 250%. The dollar values of these savings were $693,461 and $1,337,628, respectively. IMPACT: The HELP program produces considerable savings (both tangible and intangible) to the Military Healthcare System for small costs. It does this both by increasing access to care at previously inaccessibly remote medical treatment facilities and by consequently decreasing the forward provider's reliance on medical evacuation in questionable cases. This positive ROI was potentially underestimated as this analysis did not account for recapture of care that would otherwise have been sent to the civilian market. On the basis of this analysis, a low bandwidth, asynchronous, and internet accessible teleconsultation system is both a feasible and effective means of projecting quality care forward into the deployed setting. Future implementation of similar initiatives throughout the MHS can be expected, and will likely draw from the lessons learned during the successful implementation and execution of the HELP system.

Management of constipation in residents with dementia: sorbitol effectiveness and cost.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this report is to describe a cost-effective strategy for management of constipation in nursing home residents with dementia. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective observational quality improvement study of 41 residents with chronic constipation and receiving an osmotic laxative. Sorbitol was substituted for lactulose. SETTING: The study was conducted at a dementia special care unit at a Veterans Administration hospital. MEASUREMENT: We measured the number and amount of laxative use over a period of 4 weeks that were required to maintain regular bowel function. RESULTS: There was no difference in efficacy of lactulose and sorbitol. Use of additional laxatives was infrequent: Milk of Magnesia on approximately 10% of days/patient, bisacodyl suppository on 2% to 4% of days/patient, and Fleet enema only on 3 occasions. The cost of constipation management using routine administration of sorbitol and as-needed use of other laxatives was 27% to 55% lower than the cost of other constipation management strategies reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: Substitution of sorbitol for lactulose does not change efficacy of the treatment and decreases cost. Regular use of an osmotic laxative avoids the costs and discomforts of rectal laxatives.

Management of constipation in residents with dementia: sorbitol effectiveness and cost.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this report is to describe a cost-effective strategy for management of constipation in nursing home residents with dementia. DESIGN: We conducted a prospective observational quality improvement study of 41 residents with chronic constipation and receiving an osmotic laxative. Sorbitol was substituted for lactulose. SETTING: The study was conducted at a dementia special care unit at a Veterans Administration hospital. MEASUREMENT: We measured the number and amount of laxative use over a period of 4 weeks that were required to maintain regular bowel function. RESULTS: There was no difference in efficacy of lactulose and sorbitol. Use of additional laxatives was infrequent: Milk of Magnesia on approximately 10% of days/patient, bisacodyl suppository on 2% to 4% of days/patient, and Fleet enema only on 3 occasions. The cost of constipation management using routine administration of sorbitol and as-needed use of other laxatives was 27% to 55% lower than the cost of other constipation management strategies reported in the literature. CONCLUSION: Substitution of sorbitol for lactulose does not change efficacy of the treatment and decreases cost. Regular use of an osmotic laxative avoids the costs and discomforts of rectal laxatives.