Serum and CSF Anti-NMDAR Antibody Testing in Psychiatry.

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined and compared the clinical presentation of CSF positive and negative N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antibody. METHODS: The investigators performed a retrospective chart review of NMDAR-antibody-positive cases (serum or CSF) involving patients presenting to psychiatric services from 2010 to 2018 in Queensland, Australia. Presentation, progress, investigations, and efficacy of treatment are detailed. RESULTS: There were 24 serum or CSF NMDAR-antibody-positive cases and three equivocal serum results. High rates of prodromal cognitive deficits, catatonia, speech disturbance, and antipsychotic sensitivity were observed in the 16 CSF NMDAR-antibody-positive case patients and two CSF NMDAR-antibody-negative case patients, all evident before neurological deterioration with seizures, movement disorder, and autonomic disturbance occurring in the weeks following admission. The majority of these patients (N=17) were treated successfully with immunomodulatory therapy. The nine remaining patients, who were CSF NMDAR antibody negative or equivocal, did not demonstrate any of these features and improved with psychiatric care alone. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that traditional psychiatric care may be appropriate for patients with isolated psychiatric symptoms who have positive serum NMDAR testing when CSF is negative and there are no key clinical features such as cognitive deficits, catatonia, speech disturbance, and antipsychotic sensitivity. However, if these key features are present, a trial of immunomodulatory treatment should be considered with repeated examination of CSF for neuronal antibodies.

Laboratory diagnosis of creatine deficiency syndromes: a technical standard and guideline of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Disclaimer: These ACMG Standards and Guidelines are intended as an educational resource for clinical laboratory geneticists to help them provide quality clinical laboratory genetic services. Adherence to these standards and guidelines is voluntary and does not necessarily assure a successful medical outcome. These Standards and Guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of others that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, clinical laboratory geneticists should apply their professional judgment to the specific circumstances presented by the patient or specimen. Clinical laboratory geneticists are encouraged to document in the patient's record the rationale for the use of a particular procedure or test, whether or not it is in conformance with these Standards and Guidelines. They also are advised to take notice of the date any particular guideline was adopted, and to consider other relevant medical and scientific information that becomes available after that date. It also would be prudent to consider whether intellectual property interests may restrict the performance of certain tests and other procedures.Cerebral creatine deficiency syndromes are neurometabolic conditions characterized by intellectual disability, seizures, speech delay, and behavioral abnormalities. Several laboratory methods are available for preliminary and confirmatory diagnosis of these conditions, including measurement of creatine and related metabolites in biofluids using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry or gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, enzyme activity assays in cultured cells, and DNA sequence analysis. These guidelines are intended to standardize these procedures to help optimize the diagnosis of creatine deficiency syndromes. While biochemical methods are emphasized, considerations for confirmatory molecular testing are also discussed, along with variables that influence test results and interpretation.Genet Med 19 2, 256-263.