Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.237
Filter
1.
Rev Int Androl ; 22(1): 17-22, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735873

ABSTRACT

Obtaining sperm from the testis surgically and using these sperm with the intracytoplasmic sperm injection technique, has opened the way for the possibility of biological fathering in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). We aimed to evaluate our sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in NOA patients with solitary testis. In this retrospective case-control study, fortyfive patients with NOA who had a congenital or acquired solitary testis were included, between September 2003 and January 2022. These patients were randomly matched with patients with NOA who had bilateral testes, using a 1:3 matching ratio. We found that SRR by micro-TESE in patients with solitary testis was similar to NOA patients with bilateral testis (51.1% vs. 50.4%). Age, infertility period, ejaculate volume, serum levels of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone, history of varicocelectomy, history of orchiopexy, testicular stimulation therapy before micro-TESE, testicular volume, genetic status, TESE side, micro-TESE success, complications and histopathological evaluation results of both groups were evaluated, there was a statistically significant difference in only serum FSH and LH levels. There was no difference between the groups in terms of complications and hormonal effects in the early postoperative period. Micro-TESE in NOA patients with solitary testis has similar sperm retrieval and complication rates as NOA patients with bilateral testis.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Microdissection , Sperm Retrieval , Testis , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Microdissection/methods , Case-Control Studies , Adult , Testis/surgery , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Luteinizing Hormone/blood , Follicle Stimulating Hormone/blood
2.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1364285, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812814

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Although the effectiveness of pentoxifylline (PF) as a selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase to enhance sperm motility through increasing cyclic nucleotide in cases of absolute asthenozoospermia has been demonstrated for ICSI, data related to babies born from the PF-ICSI are still severely lacking. Concerns have been raised regarding the potential embryotoxicity of PF due to the controversial results obtained from the analysis of this compound on animal embryo development. This study aimed to determine whether the application of PF to trigger frozen-thawed TESA (testicular sperm aspiration) spermatozoa increases the risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes compared with non-PF frozen-thawed TESA ICSI and conventional ICSI using fresh ejaculation. Materials and methods: A total of 5438 patients were analyzed in this study, including 240 patients underwent PF-TESA ICSI (ICSI using PF triggered frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa), 101 patients underwent non-PF TESA ICSI (ICSI using frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa) and 5097 patients underwent conventional ICSI using fresh ejaculation. Propensity score matching was executed to control the various characteristics of patients. Results: No significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were observed among the three groups (PF-TESA ICSI, non-PF TESA ICSI and conventional ICSI), including biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, and live birth, following propensity score matching. Additionally, neonatal outcomes were found to be similar among the three groups, with no statistical differences observed in the birth defect, birth weight, gestational age, preterm birth, and early-neonatal death. Discussion and conclusion: PF-ICSI may be an alternative treatment in patients using frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa, resulting in comparable pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation , Pentoxifylline , Pregnancy Outcome , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Spermatozoa , Humans , Pentoxifylline/therapeutic use , Pregnancy , Female , Male , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Adult , Spermatozoa/drug effects , Cryopreservation/methods , Infant, Newborn , Pregnancy Rate , Sperm Retrieval , Retrospective Studies , Semen Preservation/methods
3.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1349000, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38689732

ABSTRACT

Recent advancements in reproductive medicine have guided novel strategies for addressing male infertility, particularly in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Two prominent invasive interventions, namely testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and microdissection TESE (micro-TESE), have emerged as key techniques to retrieve gametes for assisted reproduction technologies (ART). Both heterogeneity and complexity of NOA pose a multifaceted challenge to clinicians, as the invasiveness of these procedures and their unpredictable success underscore the need for more precise guidance. Seminal plasma can be aptly regarded as a liquid biopsy of the male reproductive tract, encompassing secretions from the testes, epididymides, seminal vesicles, bulbourethral glands, and prostate. This fluid harbors a variety of cell-free nucleic acids, microvesicles, proteins, and metabolites intricately linked to gonadal activity. However, despite numerous investigations exploring potential biomarkers from seminal fluid, their widespread inclusion into the clinical practice remains limited. This could be partially due to the complex interplay of diverse clinical and genetic factors inherent to NOA that likely contributes to the absence of definitive biomarkers for residual spermatogenesis. It is conceivable that the integration of clinical data with biomarkers could increase the potential in predicting surgical procedure outcomes and their choice in NOA cases. This comprehensive review addresses the challenge of sperm retrieval in NOA through non-invasive biomarkers. Moreover, we delve into promising perspectives, elucidating innovative approaches grounded in multi-omics methodologies, including genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. These cutting-edge techniques, combined with the clinical and genetics features of patients, could improve the use of biomarkers in personalized medical approaches, patient counseling, and the decision-making continuum. Finally, Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential in the realm of combining biomarkers and clinical data, also in the context of identifying non-invasive biomarkers for sperm retrieval.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Biomarkers , Sperm Retrieval , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/metabolism , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Biomarkers/metabolism , Biomarkers/analysis , Infertility, Male/metabolism , Infertility, Male/diagnosis , Infertility, Male/therapy , Semen/metabolism , Spermatogenesis/physiology
4.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1327800, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654926

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Azoospermia, characterized by an absence of sperm in the ejaculate, represents the most severe form of male infertility. While surgical sperm retrieval in obstructive azoospermia (OA) is successful in the majority of cases, patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) show retrieval rates of only about 50% and thus frequently have unnecessary surgery. Surgical intervention could be avoided if patients without preserved spermatogenesis are identified preoperatively. This prospective study aimed to discover biomarkers in seminal plasma that could be employed for a non-invasive differential diagnosis of OA/NOA in order to rationalize surgery recommendations and improve success rates. Methods: All patients signed written informed consent, underwent comprehensive andrological evaluation, received human genetics to exclude relevant pathologies, and patients with azoospermia underwent surgical sperm retrieval. Using label-free LC-MS/MS, we compared the proteomes of seminal plasma samples from fertile men (healthy controls (HC), n=8) and infertile men diagnosed with 1) OA (n=7), 2) NOA with successful sperm retrieval (mixed testicular atrophy (MTA), n=8), and 3) NOA without sperm retrieval (Sertoli cell-only phenotype (SCO), n=7). Relative abundance changes of two candidate markers of sperm retrieval, HSPA2 and LDHC, were confirmed by Western Blot. Results: We found the protein expression levels of 42 proteins to be significantly down-regulated (p ≤ 0.05) in seminal plasma from SCO NOA patients relative to HC whereas only one protein was down-regulated in seminal plasma from MTA patients. Analysis of tissue and cell expression suggested that the testis-specific proteins LDHC, PGK2, DPEP3, and germ-cell enriched heat-shock proteins HSPA2 and HSPA4L are promising biomarkers of spermatogenic function. Western blotting revealed a significantly lower abundance of LDHC and HSPA2 in the seminal plasma of men with NOA (SCO and MTA) compared to controls. Discussion: The results indicate that certain testis-specific proteins when measured in seminal plasma, could serve as indicators of the presence of sperm in the testis and predict the success of sperm retrieval. Used in conjunction with conventional clinical assessments, these proteomic biomarkers may assist in the non-invasive diagnosis of idiopathic male infertility.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Biomarkers , Proteomics , Semen , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/metabolism , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Semen/metabolism , Semen/chemistry , Biomarkers/metabolism , Biomarkers/analysis , Biomarkers/blood , Adult , Proteomics/methods , Prospective Studies , Sperm Retrieval , Case-Control Studies , Spermatogenesis/physiology
5.
Soc Sci Med ; 349: 116870, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631234

ABSTRACT

Terror Management Theory (Tmt, solomon et al., 1991) claims that individuals use three anxiety buffer mechanisms to regulate their death awareness - cultural worldviews, self-esteem, and proximity seeking. In this article, we use these three TMT anxiety buffers to explain the phenomenon of posthumous sperm retrieval, requested by spouses or parents, usually of young soldiers who died during their military service. Whereas this phenomenon has been known for some time, it increased dramatically in the initial days following the massacre conducted by the Hamas terrorist organization in Israel on October 7, 2023. We claim that this was an immediate reaction to this terror event, which posed a direct, existential threat to those who were exposed to the massacre and the soldiers who defended the country, but also to the entire Israeli society, as well as for Jews around the globe. We use interpretive phenomenology to qualitatively examine the phenomenon of retrieving sperm from dead young men, analyzing the requests to retrieve sperm posthumously as a sign of the need to provide these young men with symbolic immortality, on both personal and national levels. We integrate this explanation with the military ethos and the tendency of Israeli society to endorse familyist and pronatalist values to expand our understanding of this contemporary phenomenon in Israel.


Subject(s)
Military Personnel , Sperm Retrieval , Humans , Male , Israel , Military Personnel/psychology , Sperm Retrieval/psychology , Posthumous Conception/psychology , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Young Adult , Warfare/psychology , Attitude to Death , Terrorism/psychology , Qualitative Research
6.
JBRA Assist Reprod ; 28(2): 349-352, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38530764

ABSTRACT

This comprehensive review delves into the moral and ethical dilemmas surrounding post-mortem sperm retrieval (PMSR) and its implications for creating new individuals. The paper examines the challenges posed by unusual requests for sperm retrieval from the deceased's widow and parents, as well as the broader socio-ethical considerations associated with PMSR. These requests have often been denied due to the absence of established laws and guidelines governing posthumous sperm retrieval and subsequent births, which were once deemed impossible. While some countries have implemented institutional policies to regulate its use to some extent, there remains a lack of standardized rules and procedures for the collection and retrieval of sperm after death. It is essential to introduce institutional guidelines to facilitate requests for assisted reproductive technology (ART) following successful sperm retrieval. Additionally, the development of PMSR legislation is necessary to ensure a proper balance between the moral rights and fundamental rights of the deceased, their family, and any current or future offspring, while providing adequate protection for all parties involved.


Subject(s)
Sperm Retrieval , Humans , Male , Sperm Retrieval/ethics , Sperm Retrieval/legislation & jurisprudence , Posthumous Conception/ethics , Posthumous Conception/legislation & jurisprudence , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/ethics , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence
7.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 41(5): 1307-1317, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430325

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify the genetic cause of a cryptorchidism patient carrying a non-canonical splicing variant highlighted by SPCards platform in RXFP2 and to provide a comprehensive overview of RXFP2 variants with cryptorchidism correlation. METHODS: We identified a homozygous non-canonical splicing variant by whole-exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing in a case with cryptorchidism and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). As the pathogenicity of this non-canonical splicing variant remained unclear, we initially utilized the SPCards platform to predict its pathogenicity. Subsequently, we employed a minigene splicing assay to further evaluate the influence of the identified splicing variant. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed. PubMed and Human Genome Variant Database (HGMD) were queried to search for RXFP2 variants. RESULTS: We identified a homozygous non-canonical splicing variant (NM_130806: c.1376-12A > G) in RXFP2, and confirmed this variant caused aberrant splicing of exons 15 and 16 of the RXFP2 gene: 11 bases were added in front of exon 16, leading to an abnormal transcript initiation and a frameshift. Fortunately, the patient successfully obtained his biological offspring through micro-TESE combined with ICSI. Four cryptorchidism-associated variants in RXFP2 from 90 patients with cryptorchidism were identified through a literature search in PubMed and HGMD, with different inheritance patterns. CONCLUSION: This is the first cryptorchidism case carrying a novel causative non-canonical splicing RXFP2 variant. The combined approach of micro-TESE and ICSI contributed to an optimal pregnancy outcome. Our literature review demonstrated that RXFP2 variants caused cryptorchidism in a recessive inheritance pattern, rather than a dominant pattern.


Subject(s)
Cryptorchidism , Pregnancy Outcome , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Humans , Cryptorchidism/genetics , Cryptorchidism/pathology , Male , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic/methods , Pregnancy , Female , Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled/genetics , Pregnancy Outcome/genetics , Adult , Azoospermia/genetics , Azoospermia/pathology , Sperm Retrieval , Exome Sequencing , RNA Splicing/genetics
8.
J Urol ; 211(5): 678-686, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38375822

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluate microscopic (micro) testicular sperm extraction (TESE) timing relative to oocyte retrieval on intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Couples with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection with freshly retrieved spermatozoa were analyzed based on whether micro-TESE was performed at least 1 day prior to oocyte retrieval (TESE-day-before group) or on the day of oocyte retrieval (TESE-day-of group). Embryology and clinical outcomes were compared. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who underwent a successful testicular sperm retrieval was significantly lower in the TESE-day-before cohort (62%) than in the TESE-day-of cohort (69%; odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% CI [1.1, 1.7], P < .001). The fertilization rate was also found to be significantly lower in the TESE-day-before group (45%) than in the TESE-day-of group (53%; OR 1.4, 95% CI [1.2, 1.7], P = .01). Although the association between the cleavage rate and TESE timing was not statistically significant, the implantation rate was found to be significantly higher in the day-before cohort (28%) than in the day-of cohort (22%; OR 0.7, 95% CI [0.6, 0.9], P = .01). Nevertheless, it was found that the clinical pregnancy and delivery rates were not statistically significantly associated with the TESE timing. CONCLUSIONS: Although sperm retrieval and fertilization rates were lower in the TESE-day-before cohort, the 2 cohorts showed comparable embryologic and clinical outcomes. Micro-TESE can be performed before oocyte harvesting to provide physicians ample time to decide between cancelling oocyte retrieval or retrieving oocytes for cryopreservation.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Oocyte Retrieval , Testis/pathology , Semen , Azoospermia/therapy , Azoospermia/pathology , Spermatozoa/pathology , Sperm Retrieval , Biopsy , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Assist Reprod Genet ; 41(4): 1111-1124, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403804

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To identify germline mutations related to azoospermia etiology and reproductive potential of surgically retrieved spermatozoa, and to investigate the feasibility of predicting seminiferous tubule function of nonobstructive azoospermic men by transcriptomic profiling of ejaculates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sperm specimens were obtained from 30 men (38.4 ± 6 years) undergoing epididymal sperm aspiration for obstructive azoospermia (OA, n = 19) acquired by vasectomy, or testicular biopsy for nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA, n = 11). To evaluate for a correlation with azoospermia etiology, DNAseq was performed on surgically retrieved spermatozoa, and cell-free RNAseq on seminal fluid (n = 23) was performed to predict spermatogenesis in the seminiferous tubule. RESULTS: Overall, surgically retrieved sperm aneuploidy rates were 1.7% and 1.8% among OA and NOA cohorts, respectively. OA men carried housekeeping-related gene mutations, while NOA men displayed mutations on genes involved in crucial spermiogenic functions (AP1S2, AP1G2, APOE). We categorized couples within each cohort according to ICSI clinical outcomes to investigate genetic causes that may affect reproductive potential. All OA-fertile men (n = 9) carried mutations in ZNF749 (sperm production), whereas OA-infertile men (n = 10) harbored mutations in PRB1, which is essential for DNA replication. NOA-fertile men (n = 8) carried mutations in MPIG6B (stem cell lineage differentiation), whereas NOA-infertile individuals (n = 3) harbored mutations in genes involved in spermato/spermio-genesis (ADAM29, SPATA31E1, MAK, POLG, IFT43, ATG9B) and early embryonic development (MBD5, CCAR1, PMEPA1, POLK, REC8, REPIN1, MAPRE3, ARL4C). Transcriptomic assessment of cell-free RNAs in seminal fluid from NOA men allowed the prediction of residual spermatogenic foci. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm genome profiling provides invaluable information on azoospermia etiology and identifies gene-related mechanistic links to reproductive performance. Moreover, RNAseq assessment of seminal fluid from NOA men can help predict sperm retrieval during testicular biopsies.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Sperm Retrieval , Spermatogenesis , Spermatozoa , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/genetics , Azoospermia/pathology , Adult , Spermatozoa/pathology , Spermatogenesis/genetics , Infertility, Male/genetics , Infertility, Male/pathology , Testis/pathology , Mutation/genetics , Middle Aged , Genetic Profile
10.
Fertil Steril ; 121(6): 1069-1071, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38403108

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the intraoperative surgical techniques required for simultaneous radical orchiectomy and microscopic oncotesticular sperm extraction (m-OncoTESE) in a step-by-step fashion. DESIGN: Video presentation. SETTING: University Hospital (University of Chicago). PATIENTS: A 37-year-old man (status after right orchiectomy at another institution for stage II-C testicular seminoma with positive preoperative tumor markers) was referred for contralateral orchiectomy of multifocal left testis mass and fertility preservation. Semen analysis before, microscopic testicular sperm extraction during, and semen or testicular specimen analysis after the first orchiectomy were unable to identify any sperm. A postoperative analysis of the m-OncoTESE performed on the left testis resulted in the cryopreservation of 200,000 motile sperm for future assisted reproductive technology (i.e., in vitro fertilization or in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection). INTERVENTIONS: Left radical orchiectomy and left m-OncoTESE. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A comprehensive visual documentation of m-OncoTESE surgical techniques with concurrent commentary detailing the reasons behind each surgical step. A brief discussion on the background of m-OncoTESE and alternative fertility preservation methods accompanies the procedure. RESULTS: This video provides a step-by-step guide to performing an m-OncoTESE (proceeding a radical orchiectomy in a patient with testicular cancer) as a means of fertility preservation in an azoospermic patient. Successful extraction and cryopreservation of testicular spermatozoa were achieved after targeted ex-vivo testicular microdissection. CONCLUSIONS: Sperm extraction via m-OncoTESE is a viable option for azoospermic patients with testicular cancer undergoing radical orchiectomies. The use of preoperative imaging and microsurgical techniques facilitates and optimizes surgical dissection and sperm recovery.


Subject(s)
Fertility Preservation , Orchiectomy , Sperm Retrieval , Testicular Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Orchiectomy/methods , Adult , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/pathology , Fertility Preservation/methods , Seminoma/surgery , Seminoma/pathology , Cryopreservation , Treatment Outcome
13.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(8): e37201, 2024 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394502

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Testicular cancer (TC) mostly occurs in men aged 14 to 44. Studies have shown that TC seriously damages male fertility, and 6% to 24% of patients with TC were even found to suffer from azoospermia when they are diagnosed. At present, some studies have pointed out that onco-microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) can extract sperm from tumor testicles. However, there are almost no reports on remedial measures after onco-mTESE failure. Given the valuable opportunity for fertility preservation in patients with TC and azoospermia, it is necessary to provide effective remedial methods for patients with failed onco-mTESE. METHODS: Two young men, who were diagnosed with TC and also found to have azoospermia, tried onco-mTESE while undergoing radical orchiectomy for fertility preservation. However, sperm extraction failed in both patients. Subsequently, the isolated testicular tissue of the patient in case 1 suffered from TC again, and the patient in case 2 was scheduled to receive multiple cycles of gonadotoxic chemotherapy. Because both had a plan to have a birth in the future, we performed remedial mTESE. RESULTS: Sperm was successfully extracted from both patients. The patient recovered well, without complications. The patient couple in case 1 underwent 1 intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle but did not achieve clinical pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: There is still an opportunity to extract sperm successfully using onco-mTESE, despite the difficulty of fertility preservation in TC patients with azoospermia. If sperm extraction from the tumor testis fails, implementing remedial mTESE as early as possible would likely preserve the last chance of fertility for these patients.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal , Testicular Neoplasms , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/therapy , Azoospermia/complications , Testicular Neoplasms/surgery , Testicular Neoplasms/complications , Microdissection/methods , Sperm Retrieval , Semen , Spermatozoa/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Testis/surgery , Testis/pathology
14.
Andrology ; 12(1): 30-44, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37172416

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze and summarize the predictive factors of successful sperm extraction in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the factors predicting the result of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who failed the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for literature that described the characteristics of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failing the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction published prior to June 2022. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included four retrospective studies with 332 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent a failed initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction and three retrospective studies with 177 non-obstructive azoospermia patients who underwent a failed conventional testicular sperm extraction. The results were as follows: among non-obstructive azoospermia patients whose first surgery was microdissection testicular sperm extraction, younger patients (standard mean difference: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.55 to -0.01) and those with smaller bilateral testicular volume (standard mean difference: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.15), lower levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (standard mean difference: -0.86, 95% CI: -1.18 to -0.54) and luteinizing hormone (standard mean difference: -0.68, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.19), and whose testicular histological type was hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.30-9.53) were more likely to retrieve spermatozoa successfully, while patients with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73) were more likely to fail again in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Additionally, in patients who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after a failed initial conventional testicular sperm extraction, those with testicular histological type of hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 30.35, 95% CI: 8.27-111.34) were more likely to be successful, while those with maturation arrest (odds ratio: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.83) rarely benefited. CONCLUSION: We found that age, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, hypospermatogenesis, Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, and maturation arrest were valuable predictors of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction, which will assist andrologists in clinical decision-making and minimize unnecessary injury to patients.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Oligospermia , Sertoli Cell-Only Syndrome , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/surgery , Azoospermia/pathology , Oligospermia/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Microdissection/methods , Sperm Retrieval , Semen , Testis/surgery , Testis/pathology , Spermatozoa/pathology , Follicle Stimulating Hormone , Luteinizing Hormone , Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human
15.
Andrology ; 12(1): 137-156, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37245055

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive molecular biomarkers for classifying azoospermia by origin into either obstructive or non-obstructive/secretory azoospermia, as well as for inferring the spermatogenic reserve of the testis of non-obstructive/secretory azoospermia patients, are of great interest for testicular sperm retrieval outcome prediction for assisted reproduction. Prior analyses of semen small non-coding RNA expression in azoospermia have focused on microRNAs, but there has been a lack of attention on other regulatory small RNA species. In this regard, studying more in-depth expression changes of small non-coding RNA subtypes in small extracellular vesicles from semen of azoospermic individuals could be useful to select additional non-invasive biomarkers with diagnostic/prognostic purposes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A high-throughput small RNA profiling analysis to determine the expression pattern of seminal small extracellular vesicle microRNAs (analyzed at the isomiR level), PIWI-interacting RNAs, and transfer RNA-derived small RNAs in normozoospermic (n = 4) and azoospermic (obstructive azoospermia because of pathological occurring obstruction in the genital tract, n = 4; secretory azoospermic individuals with positive testicular sperm extraction value, n = 5; secretory azoospermic individuals with negative testicular sperm extraction value, n = 4) individuals was carried out. Reverse transcriptase-quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction validation analysis of selected microRNAs was additionally performed in a larger number of individuals. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Clinically relevant quantitative changes in the small non-coding RNA levels contained in semen small extracellular vesicles can be used as biomarkers for the origin of azoospermia and for predicting the presence of residual spermatogenesis. In this regard, canonical isoform microRNAs (n = 185) but also other isomiR variants (n = 238) stand out in terms of numbers and fold-change differences in expression, underlining the need to consider isomiRs when investigating microRNA-based regulation. Conversely, although transfer RNA-derived small RNAs are shown in our study to represent a high proportion of small non-coding RNA sequences in seminal small extracellular vesicle samples, they are not able to discriminate the origin of azoospermia. PIWI-interacting RNA cluster profiles and individual PIWI-interacting RNAs with significant differential expression were also not able to discriminate. Our study demonstrated that expression values of individual and/or combined canonical isoform microRNAs (miR-10a-5p, miR-146a-5p, miR-31-5p, miR-181b-5p; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve >0.8) in small extracellular vesicles provide considerable clinical value in identifying samples with a high likelihood of sperm retrieval while discriminating azoospermia by origin. Although no individual microRNA showed sufficient discriminating power on its own to identify severe spermatogenic disorders with focal spermatogenesis, multivariate microRNA models in semen small extracellular vesicles have the potential to identify those individuals with residual spermatogenesis. Availability and adoption of such non-invasive molecular biomarkers would represent a great improvement in reproductive treatment decision protocols for azoospermia in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Extracellular Vesicles , MicroRNAs , RNA, Small Untranslated , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Azoospermia/genetics , Azoospermia/metabolism , Semen/metabolism , Sperm Retrieval , Testis/metabolism , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Biomarkers/metabolism , Extracellular Vesicles/metabolism , RNA, Transfer/metabolism , Protein Isoforms
16.
Andrology ; 12(1): 157-163, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37210678

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cryptorchidism is considered to be one of the most common causes of non-obstructive azoospermia. There are several surgical techniques to retrieve sperm in these patients. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (m-TESE) is a recent sperm retrieval technique which is considered to be a safe, non-blind, and feasible method. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate sperm retrieval rate (SRR) by the mTESE method in patients who have undergone orchidopexy due to bilateral cryptorchidism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 56 ex-cryptorchid patients, who underwent mTESE due to post orchidopexy azoospermia, were included. Patients with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, Klinefelter syndrome, azoospermia factors (AZF) microdeletion, or chromosomal translocation were excluded from the study. Data were obtained from medical files. RESULTS: SRR in this study was 46%. Patients were divided into two groups of negative (n = 30) and positive (n = 26) based on the sperm extraction outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference between two groups regarding the mean age at mTESE, mean age at orchidopexy, testicular size, and serum testosterone concentration. However, testicular location, histological patterns, FSH, and LH level showed to have statistically significant relation with sperm retrieval results. But, according to our logistic regression, none of the included variable in the model including FSH, LH, histopathology, and testis location have a significant effect on the presence of the sperm. DISCUSSION: In the present study, SRR was significantly higher in patients with scrotal testis and low level of FSH and LH. CONCLUSIONS: Performing mTESE could be recommended in ex-cryptorchid patients with post orchidopexy NOA. Preoperative testicular biopsy seems to be unnecessary while clinical criteria can perfectly define NOA.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Cryptorchidism , Klinefelter Syndrome , Humans , Male , Orchiopexy , Retrospective Studies , Microdissection/methods , Semen , Testis/surgery , Testis/pathology , Spermatozoa/pathology , Cryptorchidism/surgery , Cryptorchidism/pathology , Sperm Retrieval , Follicle Stimulating Hormone
17.
Andrology ; 12(2): 422-428, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37377245

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most financially optimal surgical approach for testicular sperm retrieval for men with non-obstructive azoospermia. DESIGN: A decision tree was created examining five potential surgical approaches for men with non-obstructive azoospermia pursuing one cycle of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. An expected financial net loss was determined for each surgical option based on couples' willingness to pay for one cycle of intracytoplasmic sperm injection resulting in pregnancy. The branch with the lowest expected net loss was defined as the most optimal financial decision (minimizing loss to a couple). Fresh testicular sperm extraction implied testicular sperm extraction was performed in conjunction with programmed ovulation induction. Frozen testicular sperm extraction implied testicular sperm extraction was performed initially, and ovulation induction/intracytoplasmic sperm injection was canceled if sperm retrieval failed.  The surgical options included fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction, with and without "back-up" sperm cryopreservation, fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, with and without "back-up" sperm cryopreservation, and frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction. Success was defined as pregnancy after one intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Probabilities of successful sperm retrieval with conventional testicular sperm extraction/microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, post-thaw sperm cellular loss following frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, ovulation induction/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle out-of-pocket costs, intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy rates for men with non-obstructive azoospermia, standard conventional testicular sperm extraction cost and average willingness to pay for intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle were gathered from the systematic literature review. Costs were in USD and adjusted to inflation (as of April 2020). Two-way sensitivity analysis was performed on varying couples' willingness to pay for one cycle of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and varying microsurgical testicular sperm extraction out-of-pocket costs. RESULTS: According to our decision tree analysis (assuming minimum microsurgical testicular sperm extraction cost of $1,000 and willingness to pay of $8,000), the expected net loss for each branch was as follows: -$17,545 for fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction, -$17,523 for fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, -$9,624 for frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, -$17,991 for fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction with "backup", and -$18,210 for fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction with "backup". Two-way sensitivity analysis with a variable willingness to pay values and microsurgical testicular sperm extraction and in-vitro fertilization costs confirmed that frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction consistently presented the lowest net loss compared to other options. Interestingly, when directly comparing fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction and conventional testicular sperm extraction with "back-up", scenarios with decreasing willingness to pay and lower microsurgical testicular sperm extraction costs demonstrated fresh conventional testicular sperm extraction with "back-up" as more optimal than fresh microsurgical testicular sperm extraction with "back-up". CONCLUSIONS: For those couples who must pay out of pocket, our study suggests that frozen microsurgical testicular sperm extraction is the most financially optimal decision for the surgical management of non-obstructive azoospermia, regardless of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction cost and the couple's willingness to pay.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , United States , Azoospermia/surgery , Sperm Retrieval , Testis , Retrospective Studies , Semen , Spermatozoa , Decision Support Techniques
18.
Reprod Sci ; 31(2): 366-374, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37749447

ABSTRACT

Patients with Idiopathic non-obstructive azoospermia (iNOA) can achieve fertility by extracting testicular sperm through microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). But more than half of iNOA patients still cannot benefit from mTESE. In recent years, some studies had reported that serum hormones may be related to the outcome of sperm retrieval, but few had been verified. We hope to obtain a predictive method that is convenient for clinical application and can help judge the outcome of sperm extraction before implementing mTESE. We performed a retrospective analysis of NOA patients who underwent mTESE in the same andrology center from June 2020 to November 2022. A total of 261 patients with complete data were collected, logistic regression analysis was performed and a predictive model was constructed. Then, from December 2022 to May 2023, one prospective cohort of 48 NOA patients who met the inclusion criteria from the same center was recruited to validate the risk prediction model. We successfully constructed a logistic regression model to predict the outcome of iNOA patients undergoing mTESE and found that higher serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were associated with failure sperm retrieval, resulting in an AMH cut-off of 2.60 ng/ml. The area under the receiver operating curve was 0.811, the sensitivity was 0.870, and the specificity was 0.705. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the threshold probability was above 4%, and unnecessary mTESE could be reduced using this model. In a prospective cohort at the same center, 85.42% (41/48) of iNOA patients correctly identified the mTESE outcome using this model. A logistic regression model with AMH as an independent predictor can predict mTESE outcomes in iNOA patients. Preoperative selection of mTESE in patients with iNOA using this model had clinical benefit in reducing unnecessary surgery. The model demonstrated good accuracy in a small prospective cohort validation.


Subject(s)
Azoospermia , Humans , Male , Azoospermia/diagnosis , Azoospermia/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Microdissection/methods , Prospective Studies , Sperm Retrieval , Semen , Testis/surgery , Spermatozoa
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...