Investigation into MAO B-Mediated Formation of CC112273, a Major Circulating Metabolite of Ozanimod, in Humans and Preclinical Species: Stereospecific Oxidative Deamination of (S)-Enantiomer of Indaneamine (RP101075) by MAO B.

Ozanimod, recently approved for treating relapsing multiple sclerosis, produced a disproportionate, active, MAO B-catalyzed metabolite (CC112273) that showed remarkable interspecies differences and led to challenges in safety testing. This study explored the kinetics of CC112273 formation from its precursor RP101075. Incubations with human liver mitochondrial fractions revealed K Mapp, V max, and intrinsic clearance (Clint) for CC112273 formation to be 4.8 µM, 50.3 pmol/min/mg protein, and 12 µl/min/mg, respectively, whereas Michaelis-Menten constant (K M) with human recombinant MAO B was 1.1 µM. Studies with liver mitochondrial fractions from preclinical species led to K Mapp, V max, and Clint estimates of 3.0, 35, and 33 µM, 80.6, 114, 37.3 pmol/min/mg, and 27.2, 3.25, and 1.14 µl/min/mg in monkey, rat, and mouse, respectively, and revealed marked differences between rodents and primates, primarily attributable to differences in the K M Comparison of Clint estimates revealed monkey to be ∼2-fold more efficient and the mouse and rat to be 11- and 4-fold less efficient than humans in CC112273 formation. The influence of stereochemistry on MAO B-mediated oxidation was also investigated using the R-isomer of RP101075 (RP101074). This showed marked selectivity toward catalysis of the S-isomer (RP101075) only. Docking into MAO B crystal structure suggested that although both the isomers occupied its active site, only the orientation of RP101075 presented the C-H on the α-carbon that was ideal for the C-H bond cleavage, which is a requisite for oxidative deamination. These studies explain the basis for the observed interspecies differences in the metabolism of ozanimod as well as the substrate stereospecificity for formation of CC112273. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study evaluates the enzymology and the species differences of the major circulating metabolite of ozanimod, CC112273. Additionally, the study also explores the influence of stereochemistry on MAO B-catalyzed reactions. The study is of significance to the DMD readers given that this oxidation is catalyzed by a non-cytochrome P450 enzyme, and that marked species difference and notable stereospecificity was observed in MAO B-catalyzed biotransformation when the indaneamine enantiomers were used as substrates.

Bioequivalence Study of 2 Capsule Formulations of Fingolimod 0.5 mg Assessing Both Parent Drug and Active Metabolite in New Zealand Healthy Subjects (Truncated Design).

Fingolimod is indicated for the treatment of patients with the relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis. The primary study objective was to evaluate the bioequivalence of a test formulation, 0.5 mg fingolimod HCl capsule (Lebrina, Asofarma Sociedad Anónima Industrial y Comercial, Argentina) relative to a reference formulation, 0.5 mg fingolimod capsule (Gilenya, Novartis Pharmaceutical, Australia). In a single-center, randomized, single-dose, single-blinded, 2-way crossover study, 33 New Zealand healthy subjects of both sexes were enrolled to receive a 0.5-mg dose of 3 capsules of each fingolimod formulation under fasting conditions, with a 42-day washout period between administrations. Additional pharmacokinetic information regarding its main active metabolite, fingolimod phosphate, was also provided. The point estimate and 90% confidence intervals of the ratios of maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours were 99.07 (95.83-102.41) and 97.64 (95.33-100.00) for fingolimod, and 95.60 (90.95-100.49) and 98.54 (96.19-100.96), for fingolimod phosphate. Primary parameters, maximum concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours for fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate were found to have no significant difference when test and reference formulations were compared. Fingolimod and fingolimod phosphate of both formulations were within the accepted 90% confidence interval limits of 80.00% and 125.00%. No significant differences between the test and reference drug products were detected in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters estimated. Notwithstanding the primary conclusion of bioequivalence is focused on the measurement of the parent compound, compliance with the same criteria by the active metabolite reinforces the comparability between the pharmacokinetic profiles of both formulations (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03757338).

Siponimod pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability in combination with the potent CYP3A4 inhibitor itraconazole in healthy subjects with different CYP2C9 genotypes.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the PK and safety of siponimod, a substrate of CYP2C9/3A4, in the presence or absence of a CYP3A4 inhibitor, itraconazole. METHODS: This was an open-label study in healthy subjects (aged 18-50 years; genotype: CYP2C9 *1*2 [cohort 1; n = 17] or *1*3 [cohort 2; n = 13]). Subjects received siponimod 0.25-mg single dose in treatment period 1 (days 1-14), itraconazole 100 mg twice daily in treatment period 2 (days 15-18), and siponimod 0.25-mg single dose (day 19) with itraconazole until day 31 (cohort 1) or day 35 (cohort 2) in treatment period 3. PK of siponimod alone and with itraconazole and safety were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 29/30 subjects completed the study. In treatment period 1, geometric mean AUCinf, T1/2, and median Tmax were higher while systemic clearance was lower in cohort 2 than cohort 1. In treatment period 3, siponimod AUC decreased by 10% (geo-mean ratio [90% confidence intervals]: 0.90 [0.84; 0.96]) and 24% (0.76 [0.69; 0.82]) in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Siponimod Cmax was similar between treatment periods 1 and 3. In both cohorts, the Cmax and AUC of the metabolites (M17, M3, and M5) decreased in the presence of itraconazole. All adverse events were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The minor albeit significant reduction in plasma exposure of siponimod and its metabolites by itraconazole was unexpected. While the reason is unclear, the results suggest that coadministration of the two drugs would not cause a considerable increase of siponimod exposure independent of CYP2C9 genotype.