Spinal cord ischaemia following the gluteal injection of Benzathine benzylpenicillin.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord injury is a devastating complication, though rare but possible following the intramuscular injection of the Penicillin. The spinal cord injury can be permanent, leaving the patient with paralysis, bowel and bladder incontinence, and with other associated morbidities. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a 25-year-old gentleman who developed anterior spinal cord syndrome following the benzathine benzylpenicillin injection. In this case report, we discuss the clinical details, possible hypothesis behind spinal cord ischaemia and literature review. DISCUSSION: Spinal cord ischaemia or infarction occurs due to embolism of the Penicillin products. The products following injection are carried as emboli retrogradely through the superior gluteal artery and can cause infarction to the cord's anterior part.

[Infarction of the spinal cord and of cervical vertebral bodies following consumption of sildenafil]. / Infarto medular y de cuerpos vertebrales cervicales tras consumo de sildenafilo.

TITLE: Infarto medular y de cuerpos vertebrales cervicales tras consumo de sildenafilo.

Infarto medular y de cuerpos vertebrales cervicales tras consumo de sildenafilo / Infarction of the spinal cord and of cervical vertebral bodies following consumption of sildenafil

No disponible

Digital subtraction angiography does not reliably prevent paraplegia associated with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection.

Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) has been touted as a radiologic adjunct to interventional neuraxial procedures where it is imperative to identify vascular compromise during the injection. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESI) are commonly performed interventions for treating acute and chronic radicular spine pain. We present a case of instantaneous and irreversible paraplegia following lumbar TFESI wherein a local anesthetic test dose, as well as DSA, were used as adjuncts to fluoroscopy. An 80-year-old man with severe lumbar spinal stenosis and chronic L5 radiculopathic pain was evaluated at a university pain management center seeking symptomatic pain relief. Two prior lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections (LESI) provided only transient pain relief, and a decision was made to perform right-sided L5-S1 TFESI. A 5-inch, 22-gauge Quincke-type spinal needle with a curved tip was used. Foraminal placement of the needle tip was confirmed with anteroposterior, oblique, and lateral views on fluoroscopy. Aspiration did not reveal any blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Digital subtraction angiography was performed twice to confirm the absence of intravascular contrast medium spread. Subsequently, a 0.5 mL of 1% lidocaine test dose was performed without any changes in neurological status. Two minutes later, a mixture of one mL of 1% lidocaine with 80 mg triamcinolone acetonide was injected. Immediately following the completion of the injection, the patient reported extreme bilateral lower extremity pain. He became diaphoretic, followed by marked weakness in his bilateral lower extremities and numbness up to his lower abdomen. The patient was transferred to the emergency department for evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar and thoracic spine was completed 5 hours postinjection. It showed a small high T2 signal focus in the thoracic spinal cord at the T7-T8 level. The patient was admitted to the critical care unit for neurological observation and treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone. Follow-up MRI revealed a hyper-intense T2 and short-tau inversion recovery signal in the central portion of the spinal cord beginning at the level of the T6 superior endplate and extending caudally to the T9-T10 level with accompanying development of mild spinal cord expansion. The patient was diagnosed with paraplegia from acute spinal cord infarction. At discharge to an acute inpatient rehabilitation program, the patient had persistent bilateral lower extremity paralysis, and incontinence of bowel and bladder functions. In the present patient, DSA performed twice and an anesthetic test dose did not prevent a catastrophic spinal cord infarction and resulting paraplegia. DSA use is clearly not foolproof and may not be sufficient to identify potentially life-or-limb threatening consequences of lumbar TFESI. We believe that this report should open further discussion regarding adding the possibility of these catastrophic events in the informed consent process for lumbar TFESIs, as it has for cervical TFESI. Utilizing blunt needles or larger bevel needles in place of sharp, cutting needles may minimize the chances of this event occurring. Considering eliminating use of particulate steroids for TFESI should be evaluated, although the use of nonparticulate agents remains controversial due to the perception that their respective duration of action is less than that of particulate steroids.

A medical-legal review regarding the standard of care for epidural injections, with particular reference to a closed case.

Interventional pain management is an evolving field, with a primary focus on the safety of the patient. One major source of risk to patients is intraarterial or intraneural injections. Interventional pain physicians have considerable interest in identifying techniques which avoid these complications. A recent article has reviewed complications associated with interventional procedures and concluded that the complications were due to deviation from a specific prescribed protocol. One of the cases reviewed went to jury trial and the record of that case is in the public domain. Two of the authors of the recent review were expert witnesses in the trial. They provided conflicting testimony as to alleged violations of the standard of care. Their criticisms also differed from a third criticism contained in the article as well as the protocol being advocated in the article, thus contravening the claim that there is one prescribed protocol which must be followed. The definition of standard of care varies amongst jurisdictions, but is generally defined as either that care which a reasonably well-trained physician in that specialty would provide under similar circumstances or as what would constitute reasonable medical care under the circumstances presented. Analysis of the case which went to trial indicates that there is not one prescribed protocol which must be followed; the definition of standard of care is broader than that. Interventional pain management is an evolving field and the standard of care is broadly defined.

Retrograde filling of a thoracic spinal artery during transforaminal injection.

INTRODUCTION: Transforaminal injection of steroids has been associated with infrequent but devastating neurological complications and death. Direct injection of particulate steroids into the vertebral artery or medullary arteries is the leading theory in the majority of these complications. Practice guidelines have been published to minimize the likelihood of directly encountering vulnerable arterial structures. However, retrograde flow into a vertebral or medullary artery has not been considered in the literature. CASE: This case demonstrates retrograde flow into a common arterial trunk with subsequent antegrade flow of intravenous contrast into a thoracic spinal artery during thoracic transforaminal injection. DISCUSSION: Antegrade flow of particulate steroids through direct cannulation of a vertebral or medullary artery has been advocated as one explanation for complications involving brain or spinal cord infarction. The possibility of retrograde flow into a common arterial trunk with subsequent antegrade flow into vulnerable arteries should also be considered as a possible mechanism by which embolic spinal cord or brain injury may occur. CONCLUSION: Retrograde flow into medullary or vertebral arteries without direct cannulation can occur, and provides an alternative mechanism of potential injury to the spinal cord or brain during transforaminal injections.

Simultaneous posterior ischemic optic neuropathy, cerebral border zone infarction, and spinal cord infarction after correction of malignant hypertension.

A 31-year-old woman developed bilateral posterior ischemic optic neuropathy and infarctions of the cerebral arterial border zones and spinal cord after correction of malignant hypertension. Although a few reports have described patients with neurologic abnormalities after treatment of malignant hypertension, full clinical and neuroimaging documentation of this combination of findings has not occurred. This case report suggests that the relative hypotension of autoregulatory failure induced by treatment of malignant hypertension may give rise to these neurologic complications.

[Spinal cord ischaemia and preoperative clopidogrel withdrawal in an arteriosclerotic patient]. / Accident ischémique médullaire associé à l'arrêt du clopidogrel chez une patiente artéritique.

We report the case of a motor impairment associated with bladder dysfunction several days after clopidogrel withdrawal in an arteriosclerotic woman scheduled for thoracotomy under general and thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Even if spinal artery syndrome may have a lot of aetiologies, we believe in a direct link between clopidogrel withdrawal and medulla ischaemia.

[Acute spinal cord ischemia following deep injection therapy of the neck]. / Akuter zervikaler Rückenmarkinfarkt nach paravertebraler Infiltrationsbehandlung.

We report the case of a 40-year-old woman suffering from neck pain due to mild cervical spine injury. During conventional faceted infiltration therapy with crystalline steroids, the patient developed weakness in both arms and paresthesia of the left arm. While the weakness resolved within a few seconds, a mild deficit in motor coordination and paresthesia of the left arm were still present after 2 months. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine depicted a small hyperintense lesion at the C6 level most likely reflecting embolic infarction due to injection of crystalline steroids into a myelon-feeding artery, which has of late repeatedly been reported. We discuss potential pathomechanisms of this very rare complication and give a review of the literature.

[Spinal cord protection and opioids].

Opioids, when administered in large doses, were reported to produce brain damage primarily in limbic system and association areas in animals. We recently found the result that intrathecal (IT) morphine after a short interval of aortic occlusion in the rodent model induced transient spastic paraparesis via opioid receptor-coupled effects in the spinal cord. Histopathological analysis revealed the possibility that IT morphine could induce degeneration of spinal ventral neurons even after a short lasting of spinal cord ischaemia in rats, and this degeneration was associated with the activation of spinal N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors by elevation of glutamate release in cerebrospinal fluid after IT morphine. Therefore, we would like to emphasize that all anesthesiologists should be aware of the possibility of morphine-induced paraplegia after thoracic aortic surgery and that we should carefully select appropriate analgesic agents from the several available opioids for these patients.

Spinal cord infarction secondary to cocaine use.

A 27-yr-old woman recreationally inhaled cocaine. Several hours later, she noted chest tightness, back and neck pain, and later bilateral upper-extremity weakness. Physical examination revealed flaccid paresis of the upper extremities. Spasticity at 2 mos after injury, but no detectable weakness, developed in the lower extremities. Cocaine was detected in her urine. Magnetic resonance imaging showed hyperintensity in the anterior cervicothoracic spinal cord. Electrodiagnostic studies of the upper extremities were consistent with anterior horn cell death. Cocaine abuse is associated with cerebrovascular events; spinal cord effects are rarely reported. The patient seems to have an infarct in the anterior spinal artery distribution, with clinical, imaging, and electrodiagnostic findings of upper-extremity lower-motor neuron injury, accompanied by spasticity of the lower extremities. Gray matter has increased susceptibility to ischemia compared with white matter, producing flaccid weakness in the cervical region with isolated arm weakness. Although uncommon, cocaine abuse can cause spinal cord infarction.