Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.093
Filter
1.
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen ; 144(7)2024 06 04.
Article in English, Norwegian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832603

ABSTRACT

Spinal cord stimulation is an important modality of treatment for some patients with chronic pain. Patient satisfaction following this treatment is comparable to outcomes from spine surgery in Norway.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Chronic Pain/therapy , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Pain Management/methods
3.
Physiol Rep ; 12(9): e16039, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740563

ABSTRACT

Evaluating reciprocal inhibition of the thigh muscles is important to investigate the neural circuits of locomotor behaviors. However, measurements of reciprocal inhibition of thigh muscles using spinal reflex, such as H-reflex, have never been systematically established owing to methodological limitations. The present study aimed to clarify the existence of reciprocal inhibition in the thigh muscles using transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS). Twenty able-bodied male individuals were enrolled. We evoked spinal reflex from the biceps femoris muscle (BF) by tSCS on the lumber posterior root. We examined whether the tSCS-evoked BF reflex was reciprocally inhibited by the following conditionings: (1) single-pulse electrical stimulation on the femoral nerve innervating the rectus femoris muscle (RF) at various inter-stimulus intervals in the resting condition; (2) voluntary contraction of the RF; and (3) vibration stimulus on the RF. The BF reflex was significantly inhibited when the conditioning electrical stimulation was delivered at 10 and 20 ms prior to tSCS, during voluntary contraction of the RF, and during vibration on the RF. These data suggested a piece of evidence of the existence of reciprocal inhibition from the RF to the BF muscle in humans and highlighted the utility of methods for evaluating reciprocal inhibition of the thigh muscles using tSCS.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Stimulation , Thigh , Humans , Male , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Adult , Thigh/physiology , Thigh/innervation , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Muscle, Skeletal/innervation , Muscle Contraction/physiology , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods , Young Adult , H-Reflex/physiology , Femoral Nerve/physiology , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , Quadriceps Muscle/innervation , Hamstring Muscles/physiology , Electromyography
4.
BMC Neurol ; 24(1): 167, 2024 May 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postural abnormalities (PA) are common in the advanced stages of Parkinson's disease (PD), but effective therapies are lacking. A few studies suggested that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) could be a potential therapy whereas its effect is still uncertain. We aimed to investigate whether SCS had potential for benefiting PD patients with PA. METHODS: T8-12 SCS was operated on six PD patients with PA and all patients were followed for one year. Evaluations were made before and after SCS. Moreover, three patients were tested separately with SCS on-state and off-state to confirm the efficacy of SCS. RESULTS: Improvements in lateral trunk flexion degree, anterior thoracolumbar flexion degree and motor function were found after SCS. The improvements diminished while SCS was turned off. CONCLUSIONS: Lower thoracic SCS may be effective for improving PA in PD patients, but further studies are needed to confirm this conclusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1900024326, Registered on 6th July 2019; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=40835 .


Subject(s)
Parkinson Disease , Postural Balance , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Parkinson Disease/therapy , Parkinson Disease/complications , Parkinson Disease/physiopathology , Pilot Projects , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Prospective Studies , Postural Balance/physiology , Treatment Outcome
5.
Phys Med Biol ; 69(12)2024 Jun 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38788727

ABSTRACT

Objective. Focused ultrasound spinal cord neuromodulation has been demonstrated in small animals. However, most of the tested neuromodulatory exposures are similar in intensity and exposure duration to the reported small animal threshold for possible spinal cord damage. All efforts must be made to minimize the risk and assure the safety of potential human studies, while maximizing potential treatment efficacy. This requires an understanding of ultrasound propagation and heat deposition within the human spine.Approach. Combined acoustic and thermal modelling was used to assess the pressure and heat distributions produced by a 500 kHz source focused to the C5/C6 level via two approaches (a) the posterior acoustic window between vertebral posterior arches, and (b) the lateral intervertebral foramen from which the C6 spinal nerve exits. Pulse trains of fifty 0.1 s pulses (pulse repetition frequency: 0.33 Hz, free-field spatial peak pulse-averaged intensity: 10 W cm-2) were simulated for four subjects and for ±10 mm translational and ±10∘rotational source positioning errors.Main results.Target pressures ranged between 20%-70% of free-field spatial peak pressures with the posterior approach, and 20%-100% with the lateral approach. When the posterior source was optimally positioned, peak spine heating values were below 1 ∘C, but source mispositioning resulted in bone heating up to 4 ∘C. Heating with the lateral approach did not exceed 2 ∘C within the mispositioning range. There were substantial inter-subject differences in target pressures and peak heating values. Target pressure varied three to four-fold between subjects, depending on approach, while peak heating varied approximately two-fold between subjects. This results in a nearly ten-fold range between subjects in the target pressure achieved per degree of maximum heating.Significance. This study highlights the utility of trans-spine ultrasound simulation software and need for precise source-anatomy positioning to assure the subject-specific safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound spinal cord therapies.


Subject(s)
Ultrasonic Therapy , Humans , Ultrasonic Therapy/adverse effects , Ultrasonic Therapy/methods , Safety , Cervical Cord/diagnostic imaging , Pressure , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Spinal Cord Stimulation/instrumentation , Models, Biological
6.
J Neural Eng ; 21(3)2024 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38772354

ABSTRACT

Objective. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established treatment for managing certain chronic pain conditions. More recently, it has also garnered attention as a means of modulating neural activity to restore lost autonomic or sensory-motor function. Personalized modeling and treatment planning are critical aspects of safe and effective SCS (Rowald and Amft 2022 Front. Neurorobotics 16 983072, Wagneret al2018 Nature 563 65-71). However, the generation of spine models at the required level of detail and accuracy requires time and labor intensive manual image segmentation by human experts. This study aims to develop a maximally automated segmentation routine capable of producing high-quality anatomical models, even with limited data, to facilitate safe and effective personalized SCS treatment planning.Approach. We developed an automated image segmentation and model generation pipeline based on a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture trained on feline spinal cord magnetic resonance imaging data. The pipeline includes steps for image preprocessing, data augmentation, transfer learning, and cleanup. To assess the relative importance of each step in the pipeline and our choice of CNN architecture, we systematically dropped steps or substituted architectures, quantifying the downstream effects in terms of tissue segmentation quality (Jaccard index and Hausdorff distance) and predicted nerve recruitment (estimated axonal depolarization).Main results. The leave-one-out analysis demonstrated that each pipeline step contributed a small but measurable increment to mean segmentation quality. Surprisingly, minor differences in segmentation accuracy translated to significant deviations (ranging between 4% and 13% for each pipeline step) in predicted nerve recruitment, highlighting the importance of careful workflow design. Additionally, transfer learning techniques enhanced segmentation metric consistency and allowed generalization to a completely different spine region with minimal additional training data.Significance. To our knowledge, this work is the first to assess the downstream impacts of segmentation quality differences on neurostimulation predictions. It highlights the role of each step in the pipeline and paves the way towards fully automated, personalized SCS treatment planning in clinical settings.


Subject(s)
Neural Networks, Computer , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Spinal Cord , Animals , Cats , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Spinal Cord/physiology , Spinal Cord/diagnostic imaging , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
7.
Nat Med ; 30(5): 1276-1283, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769431

ABSTRACT

Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) leads to permanent impairment of arm and hand functions. Here we conducted a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, open-label, non-significant risk trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ARCEX Therapy to improve arm and hand functions in people with chronic SCI. ARCEX Therapy involves the delivery of externally applied electrical stimulation over the cervical spinal cord during structured rehabilitation. The primary endpoints were safety and efficacy as measured by whether the majority of participants exhibited significant improvement in both strength and functional performance in response to ARCEX Therapy compared to the end of an equivalent period of rehabilitation alone. Sixty participants completed the protocol. No serious adverse events related to ARCEX Therapy were reported, and the primary effectiveness endpoint was met. Seventy-two percent of participants demonstrated improvements greater than the minimally important difference criteria for both strength and functional domains. Secondary endpoint analysis revealed significant improvements in fingertip pinch force, hand prehension and strength, upper extremity motor and sensory abilities and self-reported increases in quality of life. These results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of ARCEX Therapy to improve hand and arm functions in people living with cervical SCI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04697472 .


Subject(s)
Arm , Hand , Quadriplegia , Spinal Cord Injuries , Humans , Quadriplegia/therapy , Quadriplegia/physiopathology , Male , Hand/physiopathology , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Arm/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Treatment Outcome , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Chronic Disease , Aged , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Electric Stimulation Therapy/adverse effects
8.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 9654, 2024 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38670988

ABSTRACT

Several neurologic diseases including spinal cord injury, Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis are accompanied by disturbances of the lower urinary tract functions. Clinical data indicates that chronic spinal cord stimulation can improve not only motor function but also ability to store urine and control micturition. Decoding the spinal mechanisms that regulate the functioning of detrusor (Detr) and external urethral sphincter (EUS) muscles is essential for effective neuromodulation therapy in patients with disturbances of micturition. In the present work we performed a mapping of Detr and EUS activity by applying epidural electrical stimulation (EES) at different levels of the spinal cord in decerebrated cat model. The study was performed in 5 adult male cats, evoked potentials were generated by EES aiming to recruit various spinal pathways responsible for LUT and hindlimbs control. Recruitment of Detr occurred mainly with stimulation of the lower thoracic and upper lumbar spinal cord (T13-L1 spinal segments). Responses in the EUS, in general, occurred with stimulation of all the studied sites of the spinal cord, however, a pronounced specificity was noted for the lower lumbar/upper sacral sections (L7-S1 spinal segments). These features were confirmed by comparing the normalized values of the slope angles used to approximate the recruitment curve data by the linear regression method. Thus, these findings are in accordance with our previous data obtained in rats and could be used for development of novel site-specific neuromodulation therapeutic approaches.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord , Animals , Cats , Male , Spinal Cord/physiopathology , Electric Stimulation/methods , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Urinary Bladder/physiopathology , Decerebrate State/physiopathology , Urinary Tract/physiopathology , Urethra/physiopathology , Urination/physiology , Epidural Space
9.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(8)2024 Apr 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38674065

ABSTRACT

Transcutaneous multisegmental spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has shown superior efficacy in modulating spinal locomotor circuits compared to single-site stimulation in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). Building on these findings, we hypothesized that administering a single session of tSCS at multiple spinal segments may yield greater enhancements in muscle strength and gait function during stimulation compared to tSCS at only one or two segments. In our study, tSCS was applied at single segments (C5, L1, and Coc1), two segments (C5-L1, C5-Coc1, and L1-Coc1), or multisegments (C5-L1-Coc1) in a randomized order. We evaluated the 6-m walking test (6MWT) and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) and assessed the Hmax/Mmax ratio during stimulation in ten individuals with incomplete motor SCI. Our findings indicate that multisegmental tSCS improved walking time and reduced spinal cord excitability, as measured by the Hmax/Mmax ratio, similar to some single or two-site tSCS interventions. However, only multisegmental tSCS resulted in increased tibialis anterior (TA) muscle strength. These results suggest that multisegmental tSCS holds promise for enhancing walking capacity, increasing muscle strength, and altering spinal cord excitability in individuals with incomplete SCI.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Injuries , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Walking , Humans , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/rehabilitation , Walking/physiology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Muscle Strength , Spinal Cord/physiopathology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Gait/physiology
10.
Presse Med ; 53(2): 104231, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636785

ABSTRACT

Neuropathic pain occurs in people experiencing lesion or disease affecting the somatosensorial system. It is present in 7 % of the general population and may not fully respond to first- and second-line treatments in up to 40 % of cases. Neuromodulation approaches are often proposed for those not tolerating or not responding to usual pharmacological management. These approaches can be delivered surgically (invasively) or non-invasively. Invasive neuromodulation techniques were the first to be employed in neuropathic pain. Among them is spinal cord stimulation (SCS), which consists of the implantation of epidural electrodes over the spinal cord. It is recommended in some guidelines for peripheral neuropathic pain. While recent studies have called into question its efficacy, others have provided promising data, driven by advances in techniques, battery capabilities, programming algorithms and software developments. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is another well-stablished neuromodulation therapy routinely used for movement disorders; however, its role in pain management remains limited to specific research centers. This is not only due to variable results in the literature contesting its efficacy, but also because several different brain targets have been explored in small trials, compromising comparisons between these studies. Structures such as the periaqueductal grey, posterior thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, ventral striatum/anterior limb of the internal capsule and the insula are the main targets described to date in literature. SCS and DBS present diverse rationales for use, mechanistic backgrounds, and varying levels of support from experimental studies. The present review aims to present their methodological details, main mechanisms of action for analgesia and their place in the current body of evidence in the management of patients with neuropathic pain, as well their particularities, effectiveness, safety and limitations.


Subject(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation , Neuralgia , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Neuralgia/therapy , Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Pain Management/methods
11.
J Neurophysiol ; 131(6): 1101-1111, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656134

ABSTRACT

Transspinal (or transcutaneous spinal cord) stimulation is a noninvasive, cost-effective, easily applied method with great potential as a therapeutic modality for recovering somatic and nonsomatic functions in upper motor neuron disorders. However, how transspinal stimulation affects motor neuron depolarization is poorly understood, limiting the development of effective transspinal stimulation protocols for rehabilitation. In this study, we characterized the responses of soleus α motor neurons to single-pulse transspinal stimulation using single-motor unit (SMU) discharges as a proxy given the 1:1 discharge activation between the motor neuron and the motor unit. Peristimulus time histogram, peristimulus frequencygram, and surface electromyography (sEMG) were used to characterize the postsynaptic potentials of soleus motor neurons. Transspinal stimulation produced short-latency excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) followed by two distinct phases of inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in most soleus motor neurons and only IPSPs in others. Transspinal stimulation generated double discharges at short interspike intervals in a few motor units. The short-latency EPSPs were likely mediated by muscle spindle group Ia and II afferents, and the IPSPs via excitation of group Ib afferents and recurrent collaterals of motor neurons leading to activation of diverse spinal inhibitory interneuronal circuits. Further studies are warranted to understand better how transspinal stimulation affects depolarization of α motor neurons over multiple spinal segments. This knowledge will be seminal for developing effective transspinal stimulation protocols in upper motor neuron lesions.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Transspinal stimulation produces distinct actions on soleus motor neurons: an early short-latency excitation followed by two inhibitions or only inhibition and doublets. These results show how transspinal stimulation affects depolarization of soleus α motor neurons in healthy humans.


Subject(s)
Motor Neurons , Muscle, Skeletal , Humans , Motor Neurons/physiology , Male , Adult , Muscle, Skeletal/physiology , Female , Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials/physiology , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Inhibitory Postsynaptic Potentials/physiology , Electromyography , Young Adult , Spinal Cord/physiology
12.
World Neurosurg ; 186: e432-e439, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561030

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulators (SCSs) are commonly implanted via a laminotomy or laminectomy. Revision surgery may be necessary in instances of hardware failure or loss of efficacy. It is uncommon for leads to have been initially misplaced in a suboptimal position and revision in these cases necessitates additional dissection for appropriate repositioning. Accordingly, there is concern with a more extensive revision for a potentially higher risk of associated complications. This study aims to describe a series of patients with failed paddle SCS electrodes due to misplacement who underwent revision and replacement. METHODS: Patients who underwent SCS paddle replacement for misplaced paddles between 2021 and 2023 were identified. Medical charts were reviewed for demographic data, operative details, and incidence of complications. RESULTS: Sixteen patients underwent thoracic SCS paddle revision and replacement. The mean age was 59.6 ± 12.6 years, with 11 females and 5 males. Misplaced paddles were too lateral (n = 12), too high (n = 2), or incompletely within the epidural space (n = 2). The mean duration from initial implantation to revision surgery was 44.8 ± 47.5 months. The mean operative duration was 126.1 ± 26.9 minutes and all patients required a "skip" laminectomy or laminotomy. No complications were encountered. The mean length of follow-up was 18.4 ± 7.3 months. Mean preoperative pain intensity was 7.9 ± 1.5 and at last follow-up was 3.6 ± 1.7 (P < 0.001). All but 1 patient continued to use their device in follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The revision and replacement of misplaced paddle SCS electrodes is a feasible and durable revision strategy, even in long-term implants with extensive scarring.


Subject(s)
Electrodes, Implanted , Equipment Failure , Laminectomy , Reoperation , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Spinal Cord Stimulation/instrumentation , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Electrodes, Implanted/adverse effects , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Adult
13.
Trials ; 25(1): 223, 2024 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) is estimated to be 10-30% in patients with chronic low back pain. Numerous conservative and surgical treatment modalities for SIJP have been described with limited evidence regarding long-term pain relief. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a well-established technique to treat patients with chronic low back pain. However, the effect on patients with SIJP is not consistent. Therefore, peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) for chronic SIJP was implemented in experimental trials. Clinical data on PNS for SIJP is still lacking. The authors present a case series and a protocol for a prospective, multicenter study to determine the effect of PNS in patients with chronic intractable SIJP. METHOD: A multicenter, prospective randomized controlled trial was designed. Patients with chronic intractable SIJP will be recruited and randomized in a 4:3 ratio to either the peripheral nerve stimulation group or to the best medical treatment group. A total of 90 patients are planned to be enrolled (52 in the PNS group and 38 in the BMT group). Patients in the intervention group receive a percutaneous implantation of a unilateral or bilateral lead which is externalized for a trial phase for 3-14 days. After trial phase only patients with at least 50% reduction of pain receive an impulse generator for permanent stimulation. Regular visits for participants are planned on day 0, after 3 months (± 30 days), 6 months (± 30 days), and 12 months (± 60 days). The primary outcome measurements is the difference in Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRS) between baseline and after 6 months. Secondary outcomes is improvement of pain associated disability (ODI) and improvement of health-related quality of life after 6 and 12 months. DISCUSSION: We have described the protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial evaluating the influence of PNS on patients with chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome. We believe that PNS on patients with chronic sacroiliac joint syndrome will show promising results regarding pain relief and quality of life in comparison to BMT after 12 months. The design of this trial promises high evidence in comparison to the data to date. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05357300. Registered on April 26, 2022.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Low Back Pain , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Low Back Pain/therapy , Sacroiliac Joint , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/therapy , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Peripheral Nerves , Treatment Outcome , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Multicenter Studies as Topic
14.
Exp Neurol ; 376: 114754, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38493983

ABSTRACT

Spasticity is a complex and multidimensional disorder that impacts nearly 75% of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) and currently lacks adequate treatment options. This sensorimotor condition is burdensome as hyperexcitability of reflex pathways result in exacerbated reflex responses, co-contractions of antagonistic muscles, and involuntary movements. Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has become a popular tool in the human SCI research field. The likeliness for this intervention to be successful as a noninvasive anti-spastic therapy after SCI is suggested by a mild and transitory improvement in spastic symptoms following a single stimulation session, but it remains to be determined if repeated tSCS over the course of weeks can produce more profound effects. Despite its popularity, the neuroplasticity induced by tSCS also remains widely unexplored, particularly due to the lack of suitable animal models to investigate this intervention. Thus, the basis of this work was to use tSCS over multiple sessions (multi-session tSCS) in a rat model to target spasticity after SCI and identify the long-term physiological improvements and anatomical neuroplasticity occurring in the spinal cord. Here, we show that multi-session tSCS in rats with an incomplete (severe T9 contusion) SCI (1) decreases hyperreflexia, (2) increases the low frequency-dependent modulation of the H-reflex, (3) prevents potassium-chloride cotransporter isoform 2 (KCC2) membrane downregulation in lumbar motoneurons, and (4) generally augments motor output, i.e., EMG amplitude in response to single pulses of tSCS, particularly in extensor muscles. Together, this work displays that multi-session tSCS can target and diminish spasticity after SCI as an alternative to pharmacological interventions and begins to highlight the underlying neuroplasticity contributing to its success in improving functional recovery.


Subject(s)
Homeostasis , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Reflex, Abnormal , Spinal Cord Injuries , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Animals , Spinal Cord Injuries/complications , Spinal Cord Injuries/physiopathology , Spinal Cord Injuries/therapy , Rats , Homeostasis/physiology , Reflex, Abnormal/physiology , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Female , Chlorides/metabolism , Muscle Spasticity/etiology , Muscle Spasticity/therapy , Neuronal Plasticity/physiology
15.
A A Pract ; 18(3): e01766, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502524

ABSTRACT

Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) is a relatively new neuromodulation technique that has shown promising results in the treatment of chronic pain conditions. We present a case of a difficult lead extraction during the explantation of a DRG-S device. The lead was unable to be removed despite multiple attempts until a sheath and stylet were used to facilitate extraction. As DRG-S utilization becomes more widespread, DRG-S device explantation will inevitably become more common. The technique described in this report may be beneficial in certain cases of difficult DRG-S lead extraction.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Neuralgia , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Ganglia, Spinal/physiology , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Chronic Pain/therapy , Neuralgia/therapy , Pain Management/methods
17.
World Neurosurg ; 185: e820-e826, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432508

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine if the use of an antibacterial envelope (TYRX) decreases the rate of postoperative infection in chronic pain patients undergoing treatment with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) involving device implantation. METHODS: Single-center retrospective cohort study comparing postoperative infections rates in non-TYRX recipients from 2018 to 2020 with recipients of a TYRX antibacterial envelope from 2020 to 2021. Infection was registered if a patient received any form of antibiotic treatment after hospital discharge within a follow-up period of 100 days. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients were included: 100 in the TYRX group and 98 in the non-TYRX group. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, diabetes, and use of immunosuppression. The overall infection rate was 5.6%. The infection rate was 4% in the TYRX group and 7.1% in the non-TYRX group (P = 0.6). However, the 4 cases of postoperative infection in the TYRX group could be effectively managed with oral antibiotics alone, whereas 6 out of the 7 patients in the non-TYRX group required intravenous antibiotics. Moreover, device explantation was necessary in 3 of these patients suggesting the event of more severe infections in the non-TYRX group (P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: The TYRX antibacterial envelope displayed infection rates reducing capabilities, along with a clear tendency to reduce revision surgeries and system removals due to infections.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Adult , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/therapy , Cohort Studies
18.
Ann Neurol ; 95(5): 966-983, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38450773

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Neuropathic pain poses a persistent challenge in clinical management. Neuromodulation has emerged as a last-resort therapy. Conventional spinal cord stimulation (Con SCS) often causes abnormal sensations and provides short analgesia, whereas high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (HF SCS) is a newer therapy that effectively alleviates pain without paresthesia. However, the modes of action of 10kHz HF SCS (HF10 SCS) in pain relief remain unclear. To bridge this knowledge gap, we employed preclinical models that mimic certain features of clinical SCS to explore the underlying mechanisms of HF10 SCS. Addressing these issues would provide the scientific basis for improving and evaluating the effectiveness, reliability, and practicality of different frequency SCS in clinical settings. METHODS: We established a preclinical SCS model to examine its effects in a neuropathic pain rat model. We conducted bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing in the spinal dorsal horn (SDH) to examine cellular and molecular changes under different treatments. We employed genetic manipulations through intrathecal injection of a lentiviral system to explore the SCS-mediated signaling axis in pain. Various behavioral tests were performed to evaluate pain conditions under different treatments. RESULTS: We found that HF10 SCS significantly reduces immune responses in the SDH by inactivating the Kaiso-P2X7R pathological axis in microglia, promoting long-lasting pain relief. Targeting Kaiso-P2X7R in microglia dramatically improved efficacy of Con SCS treatment, leading to reduced neuroinflammation and long-lasting pain relief. INTERPRETATION: HF10 SCS could improve the immunopathologic state in the SDH, extending its benefits beyond symptom relief. Targeting the Kaiso-P2X7R axis may enhance Con SCS therapy and offer a new strategy for pain management. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:966-983.


Subject(s)
Inflammation , Microglia , Neuralgia , Rats, Sprague-Dawley , Receptors, Purinergic P2X7 , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Animals , Neuralgia/therapy , Neuralgia/metabolism , Rats , Microglia/metabolism , Spinal Cord Stimulation/methods , Male , Receptors, Purinergic P2X7/metabolism , Receptors, Purinergic P2X7/genetics , Inflammation/therapy , Disease Models, Animal
19.
Am J Occup Ther ; 78(2)2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38477681

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulation technique that can improve paresis in individuals with spinal cord injury. SCS is emerging as a technique that can address upper and lower limb hemiparesis. Little is understood about its effectiveness with the poststroke population. OBJECTIVE: To summarize the evidence for SCS after stroke and any changes in upper extremity and lower extremity motor function. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and CINAHL. The reviewers used hand searches and reference searches of retrieved articles. There were no limitations regarding publication year. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA COLLECTION: This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. The inclusion and exclusion criteria included a broad range of study characteristics. Studies were excluded if the intervention did not meet the definition of SCS intervention, used only animals or healthy participants, did not address upper or lower limb motor function, or examined neurological conditions other than stroke. FINDINGS: Fourteen articles met the criteria for this review. Seven studies found a significant improvement in motor function in groups receiving SCS. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results indicate that SCS may provide an alternative means to improve motor function in the poststroke population. Plain-Language Summary: The results of this study show that spinal cord stimulation may provide an alternative way to improve motor function after stroke. Previous neuromodulation methods have targeted the impaired supraspinal circuitry after stroke. Although downregulated, spinal cord circuitry is largely intact and offers new possibilities for motor recovery.


Subject(s)
Spinal Cord Stimulation , Stroke , Animals , Humans , Paresis , Checklist , Hand
20.
Article in Russian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38465825

ABSTRACT

Postherpetic neuralgia is a chronic and debilitating condition that can occur following an episode of herpes zoster (shingles). It is characterized by severe, persistent pain in the area where the shingles rash occurred. While various treatment approaches exist, including medications and non-invasive therapies, some cases of postherpetic neuralgia may require neurosurgical intervention. Neurosurgical treatment options for postherpetic neuralgia aim to alleviate the pain by targeting the affected nerves or neural pathways. One common approach is spinal cord stimulation (SCS). In SCS, electrodes are implanted along the spinal cord, and electrical impulses are delivered to interfere with the transmission of pain signals. This technique can modulate pain perception and significantly reduce the intensity and frequency of postherpetic neuralgia symptoms. Neurosurgical treatment of postherpetic neuralgia is typically considered when conservative measures have failed to provide sufficient relief. However, it is crucial for patients to undergo a comprehensive evaluation and consultation with a neurosurgeon to determine the most appropriate treatment approach based on their specific condition and medical history. The risks, benefits, and potential outcomes of neurosurgical interventions should be carefully discussed between the patient and their healthcare provider to make an informed decision.


Subject(s)
Herpes Zoster , Neuralgia, Postherpetic , Spinal Cord Stimulation , Humans , Neuralgia, Postherpetic/surgery , Spinal Cord , Electrodes
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...