A Novel and Reproducible Classification of Cervical Dumbbell Tumors to Inform Surgical Approach and Reconstruction Techniques.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: This study developed a novel classification system based on imaging and anatomy to select optimal surgical approaches and reconstruction strategies to achieve total resection of cervical dumbbell tumors and restore spinal stability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Total resection is necessary to decrease the recurrence rate of cervical dumbbell tumors. Previous cervical dumbbell tumor classifications are insufficient for determining surgical strategies; therefore, a practical classification is needed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 295 consecutive patients with cervical dumbbell tumors who underwent total surgical resection. A novel classification of cervical dumbbell tumors was developed based on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Continuous variables were expressed as mean±SD and were compared using an unpaired two-tailed Student t test. The χ 2 test or the Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. Kendall's W test assessed three independent raters' inter-rater and intrarater reliabilities on 140 cervical dumbbell tumors. RESULTS: The inter-rater and intrarater consistency coefficient was 0.969 (χ 2 =404.3, P <0.001) and 0.984 (χ 2 =273.7, P <0.001). All patients with type I and II tumors underwent single-posterior surgeries to achieve total resection. Of the patients in this study, 86.1%, 25.9%, 75.9%, and 76.9% underwent posterior surgeries for types IIIa, IIIb, IVa, and V tumors, respectively. All patients with type IVb tumors underwent a combined anterior and posterior approach. Posterior internal fixation was used for all patients in posterior surgery. Anterior reconstruction was applied for patients with type IVb tumors (20/20, 100%) and some with type V tumors (3/13, 23.1%). The mean follow-up duration was 93.6±2.6 months. A recurrence was observed in 19 (6.4%) patients. CONCLUSION: The authors describe a novel classification system that is of practical use for planning the complete resection of cervical dumbbell tumors.

Tumores primarios de la columna vertebral: sospecha, lineamientos terapéuticos y nuevas tecnologías / Primary tumors of the spine: suspicion, therapeutic guidelines and new technologies

Los tumores de la columna vertebral son de muy rara ocurrencia, la difícil anatomía de la columna vertebral y su íntima relación con estructuras neurales hacen que la cirugía de resección sea muy compleja. Un diagnóstico tardío, una mala planificación de la biopsia y una técnica quirúrgica poco especializada pueden tener un impacto muy negativo e irreversible en la calidad de vida y en la sobrevida del paciente. En este trabajo abordaremos los principios del estudio y tratamiento de los tumores primarios de la columna.

Spinal tumors are very rare, the difficult anatomy of the spine and their intimate relation with neural structures make resection surgery very complex. A late diagnosis, poor planning of the biopsy and an unskilled surgical technique can have a very negative and irreversible impact on the quality of life and the patient's survival. In this work we will address the principles of the study and treatment of primary tumors of the spine.

An Independent Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility Evaluation of Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score and Kostuik Classification Systems for Spinal Tumor.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with spinal tumors suffer no symptoms or have mild symptoms, but about 14% of patients have refractory pain caused by mechanical instability, or symptoms of spinal cord damage caused by epidural spinal cord compression. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) and Kostuik classification are commonly used to evaluate spinal stability, and help to make a more detailed operation plan. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of the SINS and Kostuik classification, and to explore their clinical application value. METHODS: All 80 patients with spinal tumors were enrolled. Six spine surgeons who have certain clinical experience were selected. Patients were scored according to the SINS scoring system and classification was determined according to the Kostuik system. We used Fleiss and Cohen κ values to check the coefficient consistency for multifactors. We used Cohen κ value to check the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility. After 12 weeks, we repeated the analysis. RESULTS: The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the SINS scoring system were near perfect with values of 0.831 and 0.874, respectively. The interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the Kostuik classification system were moderate with values of 0.505 and 0.595, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the Kostuik classification system, the SINS scoring system has better interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility, which can be widely used in clinical practice and has great significance in the decision-making of spinal tumor treatment. Although the Kostuik classification system is often used in clinical practice, it shows inferior reliability and reproducibility in our study.

Differentiation of Predominantly Osteoblastic and Osteolytic Spine Metastases by Using Susceptibility-weighted MRI.

Purpose To evaluate the use of susceptibility-weighted MRI for the differentiation of predominantly osteoblastic and osteolytic spine metastases. Materials and Methods For this prospective study, 53 study participants (mean age, 54.5 years ± 14.3 [range, 22-88 years]; 27 men with a mean age of 55.3 years ± 12.7 [range, 22-72 years] and 26 women with a mean age of 53.8 years ± 15.7 [range, 23-88 years]) with clinically suspected spine metastases underwent imaging with standard MRI sequences, susceptibility-weighted MRI, and CT. Sensitivities and specificities of MRI sequences for the detection of predominantly osteoblastic and osteolytic metastases were determined by using CT as the reference standard. The metastases-to-vertebral body signal intensity ratio (MVR) was calculated to compare modalities. Phantom measurements were obtained to correlate bone densities between MRI sequences and CT. Results A total of 64 metastases (38 predominantly osteoblastic, 26 predominantly osteolytic) were detected. Susceptibility-weighted MRI achieved a sensitivity of 100% (38 of 38) and specificity of 96% (25 of 26) for predominantly osteoblastic metastases and a sensitivity of 96% (25 of 26) and specificity of 100% (38 of 38) for predominantly osteolytic metastases. Standard MRI sequences achieved a sensitivity of 89% (34 of 38) and specificity of 73% (19 of 26) for predominantly osteoblastic metastases and a sensitivity of 73% (19 of 26) and specificity of 92% (35 of 38) for predominantly osteolytic metastases. MVR measurements obtained with susceptibility-weighted MRI demonstrated a strong correlation with those obtained with CT (R2 = 0.75), whereas those obtained with T1-weighted MRI, T2-weighted MRI, and turbo inversion-recovery magnitude MRI showed a weak to moderate correlation (R2 = 0.00, R2 = 0.35, and R2 = 0.39, respectively). Susceptibility-weighted MRI showed a strong correlation with CT with regard to metastases size (R2 = 0.91). In phantom measurements, susceptibility-weighted MRI enabled the reliable differentiation of different degrees of mineralization (R2 = 0.92 compared with CT). Conclusion Susceptibility-weighted MRI enables the reliable differentiation between predominantly osteoblastic and osteolytic spine metastases with a higher accuracy than standard MRI sequences. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Schweitzer in this issue.

Surgical management of spinal osteoblastomas.

OBJECTIVE Osteoblastoma is a rare primary benign bone tumor with a predilection for the spinal column. Although of benign origin, osteoblastomas tend to behave more aggressively clinically than other benign tumors. Because of the low incidence of osteoblastomas, evidence-based treatment guidelines and high-quality research are lacking, which has resulted in inconsistent treatment. The goal of this study was to determine whether application of the Enneking classification in the management of spinal osteoblastomas influences local recurrence and survival time. METHODS A multicenter database of patients who underwent surgical intervention for spinal osteoblastoma was developed by the AOSpine Knowledge Forum Tumor. Patient data pertaining to demographics, diagnosis, treatment, cross-sectional survival, and local recurrence were collected. Patients in 2 cohorts, based on the Enneking classification of the tumor (Enneking appropriate [EA] and Enneking inappropriate [EI]), were analyzed. If the final pathology margin matched the Enneking-recommended surgical margin, the tumor was classified as EA; if not, it was classified as EI. RESULTS A total of 102 patients diagnosed with a spinal osteoblastoma were identified between November 1991 and June 2012. Twenty-nine patients were omitted from the analysis because of short follow-up time, incomplete survival data, or invalid staging, which left 73 patients for the final analysis. Thirteen (18%) patients suffered a local recurrence, and 6 (8%) patients died during the study period. Local recurrence was strongly associated with mortality (relative risk 9.2; p = 0.008). When adjusted for Enneking appropriateness, this result was not altered significantly. No significant differences were found between the EA and EI groups in regard to local recurrence and mortality. CONCLUSIONS In this evaluation of the largest multicenter cohort of spinal osteoblastomas, local recurrence was found to be strongly associated with mortality. Application of the Enneking classification as a treatment guide for preventing local recurrence was not validated.

Current Incidence of Different Morphological Types of Malignant Metastases to the Spine Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

BACKGROUND: Malignant tumours particularly often metastasise to the spine, causing considerable pain and limiting the patient's physical function. Standard therapy consists in surgical treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy. The qualification for surgery is a multifaceted process and detailed analysis of the morphology of the metastasis is a key factor. Numerous types of classification of metastatic lesions exist, among which the Tomita system, based on MRI findings, appears to be the most practical. The aim of this paper is to present the current incidence of different morphological types of metastases as classified by the Tomita system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This work was based on cases treated at the Department of Oncological Orthopaedics of the Specialist Hospital in Brzozów - Podkarpacie Oncological Centre from 2010-2015. A total of 854 patients with spinal metastases were hospitalised at the department. All patients underwent a CT and MRI of the spine and their metastatic lesions were classified as one of the 7 types described by Tomita. The incidence of different morphological types of metastases per type of the primary tumour was also determined. RESULTS: Most patients treated at the department had advanced disease as a result of diagnostic delays. Types T3-T7 were found in 91% of the patients and T7 in 44%. The highest incidence of advanced disease was seen among patients with breast cancer and myeloma. Higher pain severity and incidence of neurological complications were noted in patients with multisite lesions. Neurological deficits were diagnosed in 228 patients, of whom 68% were classified as Type T6 or T7. Most of the T6/T7 patients were unable to walk unassisted and required constant help from their family or medical staff. CONCLUSIONS: The Tomita system allows for easy and clear classification of the morphology of malignant metastases. 66% of patients treated at our department had multisite T6 or T7 metastases.

[Diagnostics and treatment of benign spinal tumors]. / Diagnostik und Therapie benigner Tumoren der Wirbelsäule.

Benign tumors of the spine are rare and may lead to unspecific back pain. The classification of the lesion is typically achieved with a combination of imaging techniques (MRI and CT scans) and, in some cases, a histological sampling to allow differentiation from malignant processes. Both open and interventional (CT guided) biopsies are possible, depending on the localization of the tumor. Treatment strategies are diverse, require an interdisciplinary approach, and include operative and interventional procedures. The following article gives an overview of the most important benign tumors of the spine, the typical features in imaging, and treatment strategies.

An independent evaluation on the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of Toyama classification system for cervical dumbbell tumors.

Dumbbell tumors can not only cause the compression of cervical cord and nerve root, but also invade the important structures and the surrounding organs, causing great harm to the patient. Toyama classification that is commonly used has not been evaluated and still requires independent validation.The objectives of this study were to evaluate and analyze the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of Toyama classification system, explore the differences, discover the shortages, and evaluate the clinical value for diagnosis.One hundred sixty-five consecutive patients of a cervical dumbbell tumor with complete clinical and radiologic data were enrolled. Six surgeons determined the classification according to Toyama system. The classification was repeated 12 weeks later. Correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa coefficient (κ) test were used to determine interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.The interobserver reliability for Toyama classification was moderate with a value of 0.432. The interobserver reproducibility for Toyama classification was moderate with a value of 0.608.The Toyama classification has landmark value in clinical practice, but it is a relatively cumbersome system. This study shows that it has low reliability and reproducibility. Accordingly, surgical management of the resection of dumbbell cervical tumors raises several problems, including preservation of the cervical nerve root, control of the vertebral artery, and maintenance of spine. There is a need to optimize the classification in the future.

Surgical Strategy for Spinal Dumbbell Tumors: A New Classification and Surgical Outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: One hundred twenty-four patients with spinal dumbbell tumors were analyzed retrospectively using a new classification. OBJECTIVE: To recommend a novel classification of spinal dumbbell tumors based on the characteristics of surgical approach. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Current classifications of cervical dumbbell tumor are excessively convoluted with an impractical number of variables or lack of quantitative indicators for the choice of surgical approach, and there are few classifications described in the literature which related to thoracic or lumbar dumbbell tumors. An ideal classification must be simple and reproducible based on commonly identified clinical and radiographic parameters. METHODS: The clinical records of a series of 124 patients with spinal dumbbell tumors were analyzed retrospectively using a new classification. We divided the largest transverse section of the tumor into four areas, and different areas need different surgical procedures. RESULT: Ninety-two patients were treated using the posterior approach alone, 13 patients underwent surgery by lateral cervical approach, and 19 cases were excised using combined anterior and posterior approach. Tumors total removal was 123 cases, with partial resection in one patient. Concomitant spinal fixation and fusion was performed in 18 patients. A total of 97 cases had follow-up with clinical and radiographic outcome variables ranged from 12 to 52 months (mean, 46.3 months). Eighty-eight patients (90.7%) had clinical improvement, whereas clinical status was the same in seven (7.2%), two patients (2.1%) demonstrated neurologic deterioration, and magnetic resonance imaging at last follow-up revealed no recurrence in any patient. CONCLUSION: The new classification of spinal dumbbell tumors is a simple way of identifying patients who require a different surgical approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

MRI findings in intraspinal mature teratoma.

AIM: To characterise and evaluate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images for their clinical value in diagnosing and assessing intraspinal mature teratoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI images obtained from eight patients with a histopathologically verified intraspinal mature teratoma were analysed retrospectively regarding tumour location, size, and margins. Additionally, the signal intensity and enhancement pattern on MRI and other associated malformations were also assessed. RESULTS: Three cases that contained fatty tissue showed markedly heterogeneous hyperintense signalling on T1-weighted images, and mixed hyperintense and hypointense signalling on T2-weighted images and fat-suppression sequences. All three of those cases showed an irregular peripheral fatty tissue signal, and one case showed additional patches of an interspersed calcification signal. The remaining five cases without fatty tissue displayed heterogeneous hyperintense signalling on T1-weighted images and T2-weighted images, and also on fat-suppression sequences. Four of the five cases showed additional patches of interspersed nodular calcification signals. Contrast-enhanced MRI images showed only slight enhancement (n=3). CONCLUSIONS: MRI is regarded as the reference standard diagnostic technique to reveal the location of teratomas and the degree of spinal cord involvement. In most cases, MRI provides accurate anatomical and histological information, which is necessary for patients with suspected intraspinal mature teratoma.

Spine Instability Neoplastic Score: agreement across different medical and surgical specialties.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Spinal instability is an acknowledged complication of spinal metastases; in spite of recent suggested criteria, it is not clearly defined in the literature. PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess intra and interobserver agreement when using the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) by all physicians involved in its management. STUDY DESIGN: Independent multicenter reliability study for the recently created SINS, undertaken with a panel of medical oncologists, neurosurgeons, radiologists, orthopedic surgeons, and radiation oncologists, was carried out. PATIENT SAMPLE: Ninety patients with biopsy-proven spinal metastases and magnetic resonance imaging, reviewed at the multidisciplinary tumor board of our institution, were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for SINS score agreement. Fleiss kappa statistic was used to assess agreement on the location of the most affected vertebral level; agreement on the SINS category ("stable," "potentially stable," or "unstable"); and overall agreement with the classification established by tumor board. METHODS: Clinical data and imaging were provided to 83 specialists in 44 hospitals across 14 Spanish regions. No assessment criteria were pre-established. Each clinician assessed the SINS score twice, with a minimum 6-week interval. Clinicians were blinded to assessments made by other specialists and to their own previous assessment. Subgroup analyses were performed by clinicians' specialty, experience (≤7, 8-13, ≥14 years), and hospital category (four levels according to size and complexity). This study was supported by Kovacs Foundation. RESULTS: Intra and interobserver agreement on the location of the most affected levels was "almost perfect" (κ>0.94). Intra-observer agreement on the SINS score was "excellent" (ICC=0.77), whereas interobserver agreement was "moderate" (ICC=0.55). Intra-observer agreement in SINS category was "substantial" (k=0.61), whereas interobserver agreement was "moderate" (k=0.42). Overall agreement with the tumor board classification was "substantial" (κ=0.61). Results were similar across specialties, years of experience, and hospital category. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement on the assessment of metastatic spine instability is moderate. The SINS can help improve communication among clinicians in oncology care.

Assessment of scores in decision making in metastases of the spine / Avaliação de escores na tomada de decisão em metástases na coluna / Evaluación de las puntuaciones en la toma de decisiones en las metástasis de columna

Objective : The aim of this study is to assess the intra- and interobserver concordance of SINS, Harrington, Tokuhashi and Tomita scores among general orthopedic surgeons and spine surgeons with experience above 5 and 10 years in the evaluation of patients with spinal metastasis. Methods : Twenty cases of patients with metastatic lesion of the spine were presented to 10 examiners and the scores aforementioned have been applied. After six weeks, the cases were reintroduced in a different order and data were analyzed. Results : The intraobserver reliability showed better agreement in SINS score among examiners with less experience and Harrington and Tomita scores among those who had more than 10-year experience. The interobserver reliability of the examiners of the group with over 10-year experience showed higher precision when using these scores, especially Harrington and Tomita. The SINS score was the choice for daily practice and was able to modify the management more often. Conclusions : This study demonstrated that the use of predictive scores of instability, Harrington, and prognosis, Tomita, had a higher intra- and interobserver reliability particularly among spine surgeons with experience above 10 years.

Objetivo : O objetivo deste estudo é avaliar a concordância intra e interobservador dos escores SINS, Harrington, Tokuhashi e Tomita entre ortopedistas gerais e cirurgiões de coluna com experiência acima de cinco e 10 anos na avaliação de pacientes com metástase vertebral. Métodos : Foram apresentados 20 casos de pacientes com lesões metastáticas da coluna vertebral a 10 examinadores e os escores citados acima foram aplicados. Após seis semanas, os casos foram reapresentados em ordem diferente e os dados foram analisados. Resultados : A confiabilidade intraobservador apresentou melhor concordância no escore SINS entre os examinadores com menor experiência, e nos escores de Harrington e Tomita entre os que tinham experiência maior que 10 anos. A confiabilidade interobservador dos examinadores do grupo com experiência maior que 10 anos apresentou maior precisão na utilização desses escores, e com destaque para Harrington e Tomita. O escore SINS foi o de eleição para a prática diária e foi capaz de modificar a conduta com mais frequência. Conclusões : Este estudo demonstrou que o uso de escores preditores de instabilidade, Harrington, e prognóstico, Tomita, apresentam maior confiabilidade intra e interobservador, principalmente entre os cirurgiões de coluna com experiência superior a 10 anos.

Objetivo : El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la concordancia intra e interobservador en las puntuaciones SINS, Harrington, Tokuhashi y Tomita entre los ortopedistas generales y cirujanos de la columna vertebral con experiencia superior a 5 y 10 años en la evaluación de pacientes con metástasis vertebrales. Métodos : Se presentaron 20 casos de pacientes con lesiones metastásicas de la columna vertebral a 10 examinadores, quienes aplicaron las puntuaciones mencionadas. Luego de seis semanas, los casos fueron reintroducidos en un orden diferente y se analizaron los datos. Resultados : La fiabilidad intraobservador mostró mejor concordancia en la puntuación SINS entre los examinadores con menos experiencia y en los puntajes Harrington y Tomita en los que tenían experiencia de más de 10 años. La fiabilidad interobservador de los examinadores del grupo con más de 10 años de experiencia mostró una mayor precisión en el uso de estas puntuaciones, especialmente las puntuaciones Harrington y Tomita. La puntuación SINS fue de elección para la práctica diaria y ha sido capaz de modificar la conducta con más frecuencia. Conclusiones : Este estudio demostró que el uso de las puntuaciones de predicción de inestabilidad, Harrington, y del pronóstico, Tomita, presentan mayor fiabilidad intra e interobservador principalmente entre los cirujanos de columna con más de 10 años de experiencia.

Classification and Tie2 mutations in spinal and soft tissue vascular anomalies.

Vascular anomalies included hemangiomas and vascular malformations (VMs). VMs are mediated by mutations in the endothelial cell-specific receptor tyrosine kinase Tie2 (TEK),which is essential for angiogenesis and vascular stabilization. We identified five types of Tie2 mutations in 80 patients with soft tissue or spinal VMs by PCR including the previously detected missense mutations 2690A>G (Y897C), 2740C>T (L914F), 2743C>T (R915C), and two nonsense mutations 2763G>A, 2688C>T, we identified Tie2 mutation in primary spinal VMs for the first time. Tie2 mutations were found to be absent in 33 patients with hemangiomas and DNA samples of VMs. In addition, we showed that Tie2 mRNA expression in spinal VMs was similar to soft tissue VMs, but obviously lower than infant hemangiomas (P<0.01). This study provides new insights into spinal VMs, the association of Tie2 and vascular anomalies needs to be further discussed.

[Clinical classification and selection of surgical approaches for cervical spinal dumbbell tumors].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical classification and selection of surgical approaches for cervical spinal dumbbell tumors. METHODS: The clinical data of 87 patients with cervical spinal dumbbell tumors undergoing surgical operations from January 2005 to December 2012 at our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. According to the size of inner and outer parts of tumors and the presence or absence of spinal bone damage, the cervical spinal dumbbell tumors were divided into 4 types of intraspinal predominant (I, n = 48), extraspinal predominant (II, n = 1), intrapinal and extraspinal without damage of spinal bone (III, n = 15) and intrapinal and extraspinal type with damage of spinal bone (IV, n = 7). Different surgical approaches were selected on the basis of tumor classification: posterior median-hemilamina approaches for type I tumors, lateral-muscle gap approaches for type II tumors, ateral-muscle gap-hemilamina or lateral-muscle gap-posterior median-hemilamina approaches for type III tumors, posterior far lateral-muscle gap-hemilamina or posterior median-muscle gap-hemilamina approaches plus posterior occipital cervical or cervical spinal bone graft fusion and internal fixation for type IV tumors. RESULTS: Among them, 83 cases underwent total resection and another 4 subtotal resection in one-stage operation. The postoperative follow-up period had a range of 9 months to 6 years (mean, 3.2 years). There was no recurrence of tumors for total resection and 1 case of tumor recurrence for subtotal resection. During the follow-up period, the clinical manifestations of 85 patients improved while another 2 deteriorated. And there was no occurrence of spinal deformity. CONCLUSION: Clinical classification of cervical spinal dumbbell tumor plays an important guiding role in the selection of surgical approaches. Adopting appropriate surgical approaches based on tumor type can not only improve the rate of total resection of tumor but also reduce the incidence of postoperative spinal deformity.

Spinal angiolipoma: etiology, imaging findings, classification, treatment, and prognosis.

PURPOSE: To summarise our experience treating patients with spinal angiolipomas (SAs) and to evaluate factors relating to its prognosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with SAs who received surgical treatment from January 2001 to February 2013. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were described. We divide SAs into two types: "intraspinal" and "dumbbell-shaped". The former were further subclassified as "with lipomatosis" and "without lipomatosis". Overweight people are more likely to get the "with lipomatosis" type which needs different surgical strategy and/or a diet therapy to get better outcomes. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of SAs should be made with reference to clinical, radiological, and pathological findings. Application of different methods is needed to treat SAs.

The NOMS framework: approach to the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Spinal metastases frequently arise in patients with cancer. Modern oncology provides numerous treatment options that include effective systemic, radiation, and surgical options. We delineate and provide the evidence for the neurologic, oncologic, mechanical, and systemic (NOMS) decision framework, which is used at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center to determine the optimal therapy for patients with spine metastases. METHODS: We provide a literature review of the integral publications that serve as the basis for the NOMS framework and report the results of systematic implementation of the NOMS-guided treatment. RESULTS: The NOMS decision framework consists of the neurologic, oncologic, mechanical, and systemic considerations and incorporates the use of conventional external beam radiation, spinal stereotactic radiosurgery, and minimally invasive and open surgical interventions. Review of radiation oncology and surgical literature that examine the outcomes of treatment of spinal metastatic tumors provides support for the NOMS decision framework. Application of the NOMS paradigm integrates multimodality therapy to optimize local tumor control, pain relief, and restoration or preservation of neurologic function and minimizes morbidity in this often systemically ill patient population. CONCLUSION: NOMS paradigm provides a decision framework that incorporates sentinel decision points in the treatment of spinal metastases. Consideration of the tumor sensitivity to radiation in conjunction with the extent of epidural extension allows determination of the optimal radiation treatment and the need for surgical decompression. Mechanical stability of the spine and the systemic disease considerations further help determine the need and the feasibility of surgical intervention.

[Clinico-pathological and molecular aspects of diagnostic and prognostic value in gliomas]. / Aspectos clinicopatologicos y moleculares de valor diagnostico y pronostico en gliomas.

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse infiltrative gliomas, the most common primary brain tumours, account for almost 80% of malignant brain tumours. 60-70% of gliomas are astrocytic and over 80% of these tumours is considered high grade malignancy (grade III and IV) according to current World Health Organization classification. Infiltrating gliomas include diffuse astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas. AIM: To review the clinical and histological features of cerebral gliomas, and molecular alterations that add relevant information for novel approaches in diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. DEVELOPMENT: The current gold standard diagnosis of these tumours relies on histopathological classification, which provides a grading of malignancy as a predictor of biological behaviour. However emerging molecular abnormalities have been discovered in the last years and these molecular changes are playing an increasingly prominent role as predictive biomarkers or in the development of diagnostic and prognostic. Now the neuropathologist is in crossroads between pathology and molecular biology and he plays a significant role in implementation of treatments and/or clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: The study of proteomics and molecular biomarkers should complement the histopathological analysis and sometimes allows to determine direct or indirect predictive factors as well as the study of affected pathways which may become selective therapeutic targets.

Generalizable class solutions for treatment planning of spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: Spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) continues to emerge as an effective therapeutic approach to spinal metastases; however, treatment planning and delivery remain resource intensive at many centers, which may hamper efficient implementation in clinical practice. We sought to develop a generalizable class solution approach for spinal SBRT treatment planning that would allow confidence that a given plan provides optimal target coverage, reduce integral dose, and maximize planning efficiency. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We examined 91 patients treated with spinal SBRT at our institution. Treatment plans were categorized by lesion location, clinical target volume (CTV) configuration, and dose fractionation scheme, and then analyzed to determine the technically achievable dose gradient. A radial cord expansion was subtracted from the CTV to yield a planning CTV (pCTV) construct for plan evaluation. We reviewed the treatment plans with respect to target coverage, dose gradient, integral dose, conformality, and maximum cord dose to select the best plans and develop a set of class solutions. RESULTS: The class solution technique generated plans that maintained target coverage and improved conformality (1.2-fold increase in the 95% van't Riet Conformation Number describing the conformality of a reference dose to the target) while reducing normal tissue integral dose (1.3-fold decrease in the volume receiving 4 Gy (V(4Gy)) and machine output (19% monitor unit (MU) reduction). In trials of planning efficiency, the class solution technique reduced treatment planning time by 30% to 60% and MUs required by ∼20%: an effect independent of prior planning experience. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a set of class solutions for spinal SBRT that incorporate a pCTV metric for plan evaluation while yielding dosimetrically superior treatment plans with increased planning efficiency. Our technique thus allows for efficient, reproducible, and high-quality spinal SBRT treatment planning.

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours of the spine: clinical manifestations, classification, treatment, and prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To summarise our experience treating patients with spinal malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients diagnosed with spinal MPNSTs who received surgical treatment from January 1998 to December 2009. RESULTS: Postoperative follow-up data were available for 14/16 patients with spinal MPNSTs (7 men, 7 women; median age = 44 years [range: 23-68 years]). Eight of 14 (57.1%) patients had primary and 6/14 (42.9%) recurrent MPNSTs. A total of 12/14 (85.7%) patients underwent total tumour resection, whereas 2/14 (14.3%) patients underwent subtotal tumour resection. Malignancies were graded low in 4 (28.6%) and high in 10 (71.1%) cases. A total of 12/14 (85.7%) patients experienced tumour recurrence and 10/14 (71.4%) patients died during the course of follow-up. The 0.5- 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 64.3, 48.2, 32.1, and 21.4%, respectively. Overall survival was significantly associated with tumour malignant degree (P = 0.012). CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of spinal MPNSTs should be made with reference to clinical, radiological, and pathological findings. Surgical resection is the best available option for treating spinal MPNST; however, postoperative prognosis is poor.