Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 132
Filter
1.
Head Neck ; 46(5): 1152-1159, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38494597

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Phase 1 CLOVER study (NCT03509012) assessed durvalumab in combination with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in patients with advanced solid tumors; we report results from the head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cohort. METHODS: Patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed locally advanced HNSCC, eligible for definitive cCRT and not considered for primary surgery, received durvalumab plus cisplatin and concurrent external beam radiation. Objectives were to assess safety/tolerability and preliminary efficacy. RESULTS: Eight patients were enrolled. The most frequent any-cause adverse events (AEs) were nausea and radiation skin injury (each n = 5); most frequent grade 3/4 AEs were lymphopenia and stomatitis (each n = 3). No patients had dose-limiting toxicities. Objective response rate was 71.4% (5/7 patients; four complete responses, one partial response); disease control rate was 85.7% at 18 weeks and 83.3% at 48 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Durvalumab plus cCRT was tolerable and active in patients with unresected, locally advanced HNSCC.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(4): 1913-1921, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38180604

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Treatment de-intensification for p16 + oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is an area of active research to reduce the side effects and improve patients' quality of life (QoL). In this paper we evaluated the Overall Survival (OS), the Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and the QoL of patients affected by p16 + OPSCC according to their prognostic stage group (PSG) and different treatments. METHODS: Patients were selected retrospectively through our Electronic Tumor Board Database according to prespecified inclusion criteria. Basic data of eligible patients were recorded and analyzed. Then, OS and DFS were evaluated according to the PSG and the treatments performed. Patients alive completed three questionnaires: the QoL Questionnaire Core 30 (QLQ-C30), the QoL Questionnaire Head & Neck 43 (QLQ-HN43) and the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) questionnaire. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were included in this study. Eight patients died from the disease and the remaining 53 patients completed the 3 questionnaires. Fifteen (25%) patients were treated with upfront surgery, 6 (10%) patients with definitive radiotherapy and 40 (65%) patients with concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Comparing the DFS and the OS of PSG I patients by the different treatments performed, no statistically significant difference was identified. Patients treated with upfront surgery showed better outcomes in some aspects of their QoL. CONCLUSION: For p16 + OPSCC PSG I patients, upfront surgery can be considered a valid alternative to radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy while maintaining a comparable DFS and OS and giving patients better results in terms of specific aspects of their QoL.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Disease-Free Survival , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/therapy , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology
3.
Head Neck ; 46(2): 321-327, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37997549

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The impact of concurrent chemotherapy and immunotherapy has been well characterized in patients with recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RM-SCCHN). Here, we report outcomes in patients treated sequentially with immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel. METHODS: Patients with RM-SCCHN treated with ICI followed by carboplatin/paclitaxel at a single institution were identified retrospectively. ICI therapy history, p16, and PD-L1 status were collected. The best overall response was assessed by RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Twelve patients met inclusion criteria. Eight patients received pembrolizumab, three durvalumab, and one nivolumab. The median duration of ICI was 3.44 months, median PFS was 5.8 months, and median OS was 15.2 months. 66.7% of patients had an objective response on carboplatin/paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: Carboplatin/paclitaxel can induce objective responses in patients with prior treatment with ICI and clinical outcomes in this small series compare favorably to those seen in ICI naïve patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Carboplatin , Paclitaxel , B7-H1 Antigen , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
4.
Radiother Oncol ; 190: 109977, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37922991

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Unilateral radiation therapy is appropriate for select patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The use of proton beam therapy (PBT) in the unilateral setting decreases the dose to the contralateral neck and organs at risk. This study aims to evaluate contralateral recurrences in patients who received ipsilateral PBT. METHODS: We evaluated the Proton Collaborative Group database for patients treated with PBT for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma between the years 2015-2020 at 12 institutions. Dosimetric analysis was performed in five cases. RESULTS: Our analysis included 41 patients that received ipsilateral PBT with a mean follow-up of 14.7 months. 37% patients (n = 15) were treated for recurrent disease, and 63% (n = 26) were treated for de novo disease. Oropharyngeal sites included tonsillar fossa (n = 30) and base of tongue (n = 11). The median dose and BED delivered were 69.96 CGE and 84 Gy, respectively. Eight (20%) patients experienced at least one grade 3 dysphagia (n = 4) or esophagitis (n = 4) toxicity. No grade ≥ 4 toxicities were reported. There was one (2.4%) failure in the contralateral neck. The 1-year locoregional control was 88.9% and the freedom from distant metastasis was 95.5% (n = 2). The dosimetric analysis demonstrated similar ipsilateral level II cervical nodal region doses, whereas contralateral doses were higher with photon plans, mean: 15.5 Gy and 0.7CGE, D5%: 25.1 Gy and 6.6CGE. CONCLUSIONS: Our series is the first to report outcomes for patients with OPSCC receiving unilateral PBT. The contralateral neck failure rate was excellent and comparable to failure rates with photon irradiation.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Proton Therapy , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Protons , Prospective Studies , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Proton Therapy/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Radiotherapy Dosage
5.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 45(1): 104074, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37865986

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: While there has been an increased understanding of the impact of visible neck scars in some patients with certain diseases, this has not yet been explored in the HPV+ OPSCC population. OBJECTIVE: To understand patients' perception of their scar and the impact on their quality of life (QOL) at least 6 months after neck dissection (ND) for HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In this retrospective case-control study, patients who underwent primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and ND for HPV+ OPSCC between 2016 and 2021 at a single tertiary care center were identified. Data analysis was performed in January 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Dermatology Life Quality Index was modified (mDLQI) to assess patients' perceptions of their scars. The primary outcome was the mean mDLQI survey score with higher scores corresponding to worse perceptions. Three questions adapted from the Self-Consciousness Scale (SCS) were also included to assess awareness of appearance. All questions were scaled on a 0-3 Likert Scale. Tweedie generalized linear model was used to understand the relationship between mDLQI score and patient- and procedure-specific factors (including the three SCS survey questions). An additional exploratory logistic regression was performed to understand the risk factors for clinically significant mDLQI score change. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients (response rate 57 %) completed the survey with a mean mDLQI survey score of 0.84 (max 30). Although there was a statistically significant negative association between private insurance and mDLQI survey score (95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: -2.72 - -0.38), and a positive association between the SCS score and mDLQI survey score (95 % CI: 0.23-0.81) (p < 0.05), these variables were not found to be risk factors for a clinically significant difference in mDLQI on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION: The majority of patients felt their neck scars did not interfere with their daily lives. Patient perceptions of neck scars were consistent despite differing patient characteristics and treatment regimens.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms , Papillomavirus Infections , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Neck Dissection/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Cicatrix/etiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Case-Control Studies , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/surgery , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Perception , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
6.
Head Neck ; 46(1): 46-56, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37867317

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Salvage total laryngectomy (STL) is a preferred treatment for patients with residual, recurrent, and second primary squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx/hypopharynx after (chemo)radiation. To individually estimate postoperative oncological outcomes, we designed and validated prognostic nomograms. METHODS: We used a dataset of 290 patients who underwent STL. Nomograms predicting 2- and 5-year OS, DFS, and DSS were developed, using variables which are identified pre- or postoperatively. The nomograms were externally validated on a dataset of 109 patients. RESULTS: The nomograms based on postoperative variables performed better than those based on preoperative variables (OS: C = 0.68 vs. 0.64; DFS: C = 0.70 vs. 0.64; DSS: C = 0.74 vs. 0.64). The nomogram predicting DSS based on postoperative variables performed best. CONCLUSIONS: The presented prognostic nomograms for predicting oncological outcomes in patients who undergo STL are tools which allow for a reliable prognostic assessment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms , Laryngeal Neoplasms , Humans , Prognosis , Laryngectomy/adverse effects , Nomograms , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/surgery , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Hypopharynx/pathology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Laryngeal Neoplasms/etiology , Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms/etiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy
7.
J Appl Oral Sci ; 31: e20230227, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38126564

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lip squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) accounts for 12% of all head and neck cancers. It is caused by chronic exposure to ultraviolet light solar radiation and related to previous actinic cheilitis (AC). This study aimed to investigate the immunostaining of the putative cancer stem cells (CSC) markers ALDH1 and CD44 in AC (n=30) and LSCC (n=20). ALDH1 positivity was found to be statistically higher in LSCC than in AC lesions (p=0.0045), whilst CD44 expression was statistically higher in AC than in LSCC lesions (p=0.0155). ALDH1+ cells in AC lesions were associated with specific clinical features: a younger age (<60 years old), the female gender, white skin, not smoking or consuming alcohol, and a fast evolution, and not associated with the chronic exposure to UV radiation (p<0.0001). CD44 positivity was associated with patients who were male, feoderm, smoked, consumed alcohol, underwent occupational exposure to UV-radiation, and demonstrated lesions with log-time evolution (p<0.0001). ALDH1 + cells were associated with mild dysplasia using a system from the World Health Organization (WHO), and with a low risk of malignant transformation, according to the binary system (p<0.0001). CD44+ cells were also associated with moderated dysplasia, according to the WHO system. In LSCC, ALDH1 + cells were positively associated with patients who were older (≥ 60 years old), smokers, and with those who consumed alcohol (p<0.0001). CD44 + cells in LSCC were associated with older (≥ 60 years old) patients as well, but also with female patients, white skin, non-smokers, and individuals who did not consume alcohol (p<0.0001), all of whom showed distinct patterns in pre- and malignant lesions of both markers. Additionally, in LSCC, both ALDH1 and CD44 staining were associated with smaller tumor sizes (T1/T2; p<0.0001). In summary, although both ALDH1 and CD44 were associated with the presence of dysplasia in AC lesions, the present findings suggest that ALDH1 and CD44 may be activated by different etiopathogenic pathways, predominantly in distinct steps of oral carcinogenesis. CD44 would thus be more significantly related to the potentially malignant lesion, while ALDH1 would be closely linked to malignancy.


Subject(s)
Lip Neoplasms , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family , Biomarkers, Tumor , Carcinogenesis , Hyaluronan Receptors/metabolism , Lip/metabolism , Lip/pathology , Lip Neoplasms/etiology , Lip Neoplasms/metabolism , Lip Neoplasms/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/metabolism , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology
8.
Oral Oncol ; 147: 106615, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37931493

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Cetuximab-based chemotherapy is a standard 1st-line treatment for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN). However, few studies have reported survival data for a treatment sequence consisting of a PCE regimen (paclitaxel + carboplatin + cetuximab) followed by an immune checkpoint inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 37 patients with R/M SCCHN from the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who received PCE as 1st-line treatment followed by nivolumab as 2nd-line at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between December 2016 and July 2021. For comparison, we also analyzed 14 patients who did not receive nivolumab after PCE. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients who received nivolumab, overall response rate (ORR) by PCE was 48.6%, and median time to response and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 2.1 months (range: 0.8-4.8) and 4.4 months, respectively. In the nivolumab phase, ORR was 10.8%. 23 patients received 3rd-line therapy. Median PFS2, PFS3, and overall survival (OS) were 6.8, 11.6, and 19.5 months, respectively. Subgroup analysis by PD-L1 expression showed no significant difference in OS. Analysis of the comparison group revealed a trend toward improved OS in those who received nivolumab compared to those who did not (HR 0.47, 95%CI [0.19-1.13], p = 0.084). CONCLUSION: PCE followed by nivolumab shows a favorable survival outcome, representing the potential for rapid tumor response with PCE and extension of OS by the addition of nivolumab regardless of combined positive score.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Nivolumab , Humans , Cetuximab/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Paclitaxel , Retrospective Studies , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
9.
Oral Oncol ; 147: 106587, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37925894

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the phase 3 KEYNOTE-040 study, pembrolizumab prolonged OS versus chemotherapy in previously treated recurrent or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC. We present a post hoc subgroup analysis by disease recurrence pattern: recurrent-only, recurrent and metastatic (recurrent-metastatic), and metastatic-only HNSCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients had HNSCC that progressed during or after platinum-containing treatment for R/M disease or had recurrence or progression within 3-6 months of previous platinum-containing definitive therapy for locally advanced disease. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or investigator's choice of standards of care (SOC): methotrexate, docetaxel, or cetuximab. Outcomes included OS, PFS, ORR, and DOR. The data cutoff was May 15, 2017. RESULTS: There were 125 patients (pembrolizumab, 53; SOC, 72) in the recurrent-only subgroup, 204 in the recurrent-metastatic subgroup (pembrolizumab, 108; SOC, 96), and 166 in the metastatic-only subgroup (pembrolizumab, 86; SOC, 80). The hazard ratio (95% CI) for death for pembrolizumab versus SOC was 0.83 (0.55-1.25) in the recurrent-only, 0.78 (0.58-1.06) in the recurrent-metastatic, and 0.74 (0.52-1.05) in the metastatic-only subgroups. PFS was similar between treatment arms in all subgroups. ORR was 22.6% for pembrolizumab versus 16.7% for SOC in the recurrent-only, 10.2% versus 6.3% in the recurrent-metastatic, and 15.1% versus 8.8% in the metastatic-only subgroups. DOR was numerically longer with pembrolizumab in all subgroups. CONCLUSION: Pembrolizumab provided numerically longer OS and durable responses in all subgroups compared with SOC, suggesting that patients with previously treated R/M HNSCC benefit from pembrolizumab regardless of recurrence pattern.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Methotrexate , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Cetuximab/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Platinum/therapeutic use , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
10.
Head Neck ; 45(12): 3119-3128, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37814926

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We prospectively assessed acute and late toxicity in post-operative oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (PO-OCSCC) treated with adjuvant dysphagia optimized intensity-modulated radiotherapy (Do-IMRT) versus standard IMRT (S-IMRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients of PO-SCC without indications of concurrent chemotherapy were alternatively allocated to adjuvant Do-IMRT (n = 28) versus S-IMRT (n = 28) arms. High- and low-risk planning target volume received 60 and 54 Gy, respectively, in 30 fractions over 6 weeks. Dysphagia aspiration-related structures (DARS) were contoured in both arms. While dosimetric constraints were given in Do-IMRT arm, doses to DARS were only observed without dose constraints in S-IMRT arm. Acute and late toxicity were assessed by common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) v5.0 and RTOG criteria, respectively. RESULTS: The primary site of disease was buccal mucosa (64% vs. 53%) and oral tongue (21% vs. 32%), in Do-IMRT and S-IMRT, respectively. The mean doses to DARS was significantly less with Do-IMRT (all p < 0.001) as compared to S-IMRT. Median follow-up was 24.2 months. Grade ≥2 oral pain was less in the Do-IMRT arm (50% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.05). Grade ≥2 late dysphagia at 2 years were significantly less in Do-IMRT arm (0% vs. 17.9%, p = 0.016). Two-year locoregional control was 89.2% in Do-IMRT and 78.5% in S-IMRT (p = 0.261). CONCLUSION: DARS can be spared in PO-OCSCC patients treated with Do-IMRT without compromising coverage of the target volumes. Limiting doses to DARS leads to lesser acute and late toxicity without compromising locoregional control.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Deglutition Disorders , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Deglutition Disorders/etiology , Prospective Studies , Mouth Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Mouth Neoplasms/etiology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Tongue/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Radiotherapy Dosage
11.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37830119

ABSTRACT

Objective:To evaluate the clinical significance of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of larynx preservation in locally advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods:Patients with locally advanced HPSCC(cT3-T4aN0-N3M0) were eligible. All received 2 cycles of pembrolizumab combined with docetaxel and platinum neoadjuvant induction therapy. After two cycles, the efficacy was evaluated, followed by radical chemoradiotherapy or surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy according to the efficacy. The primary endpoints were objective response rate(ORR) ,larynx-preservation(LP) rate at 3 months post-treatment and the adverse reactions during neoadjuvant therapy. Results:From December 2021 to December 2022, 10 patients with locally advanced HPSCC(cT3-T4aN0-N3M0) were enrolled. After 2 cycles of the neoadjuvant therapy, 2 patients achieved complete response(CR), 7 patients achieved partial response(PR), 1 patient was stable disease(SD), objective response rate(ORR) was 90%, and disease control rate(DCR) was 100%. 5 patients received radical chemoradiotherapy, 5 patients received surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, four of them received partial laryngectomy and partial hypopharyngeal resection surgery, and one of them received total laryngectomy and partial hypopharyngeal resection surgery. All patients were able to withstand adverse reactions of neoadjuvant therapy and successfully completed the whole treatment of HPSCC without grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse reactions. There was no recurrence or metastasis during 3-18 months of follow-up. 1 patient died of severe pneumonia 3 months after the completion of radical chemoradiotherapy. At 3 months after treatment, the larynx-preservation rate was 80%. Conclusion:Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has good short-term efficacy and the adverse reactions were tolerable. It can improve the larynx-preservation rate of patients with locally advanced HPSCC, thus improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Larynx , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Quality of Life , Cisplatin , Treatment Outcome , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy
12.
Head Neck ; 45(12): 3075-3085, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37792371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Identification of predictive biomarkers to Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in head and neck cancer (HNSCC) is an unmet need. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study including 25 patients with HNSCC treated with immunotherapy or chemotherapy after a prior platinum-based regimen. Low density neutrophils (LDNs) and serum markers were analyzed. RESULTS: In the immunotherapy cohort, patients with high LDN levels had a shorter progression free survival (PFS) (1.8 months vs. 10.9 months; *p = 0.034). Also, progressors showed higher percentage of LDNs compared to non-progressors although significance was not reached (mean 20.68% vs. 4.095%, p = 0.0875). These findings were not replicated in patients treated with chemotherapy. High levels of interleukin-7 (IL7) were correlated with a significantly longer overall survival (OS) (13.47 months 3.51 vs. months, *p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: High baseline circulating LDNs and low IL7 could identify a subset of patients intrinsically refractory to ICIs as monotherapy in HNSCC.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Interleukin-7 , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Neutrophils , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Biomarkers , Immunotherapy/adverse effects
13.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 72(12): 4209-4219, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37837458

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the antitumor activity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in conjunction with PD-1 inhibitors (neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy) among patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPHSCC) and compare its efficacy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from patients diagnosed with OPHSCC and treated at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between September 2012 and August 2022. We included patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or combined with PD-1 inhibitors. We assessed the clinical response using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Preliminary results demonstrate that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy exhibited robust antitumor activity in OPHSCC, with an impressive overall response rate (ORR) of 81.0%. Complete response and partial response rates were 14.9% and 65.9%, respectively. Notably, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated superior PFS and OS to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The 1-year PFS rate was 80.7%, and the 2-year rate was 61.1%. Additionally, the 1-year OS rate reached 92.3%. Finally, a multivariate analysis identified the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage reduction post-treatment as a favorable predictor of PFS. CONCLUSION: Our results underscore the promising potential of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in enhancing antitumor activity in patients with OPHSCC. The robust ORR, along with improved PFS and OS, supports the utility of this combined approach. These results pave the way for further investigations to validate and refine the application of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in this challenging clinical context.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
14.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37828879

ABSTRACT

Objective:The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tislelizumab in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Methods:Six patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who received tislelizumab monotherapy in our hospital from 2018 to 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The information of sex, age, TNM stage, efficacy, and adverse reactions were collected. All patients were recruited from the RATIONALE 102 study. The primary end point was the objective response rate, and other end points included progression-free survival and overall survival. We performed tumor immune-related gene sequencing and transcriptome sequencing analysis on the tumor tissues of the patient, and used bioinformatics methods to enrich immune cells and analyze signaling pathways. All analyses were performed using R 4.1. 0 software, SPSS Statistics 24.0 software and GraphPad Prism 8. Results:As of May 31, 2020, the median follow-up time was 26.35 months. The objective response rate with tislelizumab was 50.0%, the median progression-free survival was 6.44 months, and the estimated median survival was 20.07 months. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse reactions was 66.7%, including hyponatremia, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, etc. The expression of macrophage, Treg and neutrophil-related genes are higher in immune-sensitive patients, and the signaling pathways of the intestinal immune network for IgA production, graft versus host disease and autoimmune thyroid disease are significantly activated. Conclusion:Tislelizumab was found to be controllable and tolerable in patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The response to tislelizumab is related to immune cell infiltration and activation of immune-related signaling pathways.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
15.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1189752, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37583698

ABSTRACT

Background: This study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (LA-HNSCCs). Methods: In this prospective, single-arm, single-centre clinical trial, patients meeting the inclusion criteria were treated with preoperative neoadjuvant therapy with 200 mg pembrolizumab combined with 75 mg/m2 cisplatin and 175 mg/m2 paclitaxel. This was followed by surgery and postoperative adjuvant therapy. The primary endpoint was the postoperative pathological complete response (pCR) rate. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26. Results: A total of 22 patients were enrolled. The location of primary lesion showed: hypopharynx were 15 (68.2%), oropharynx were 6 (27.3%) and oral cavity was 1 (4.5%). The postoperative pCR rate, was 36.4% (8/22), and there was no delay to surgery due to adverse drug reactions. The rate of laryngeal function preservation was 90.9% (20/22). Delayed wound healing was the main surgical complication, with an incidence of 22.7% (5/22). The median follow-up time was 9.5 months, and only 1 patient (4.55%) suffered a regional recurrence. Conclusion: Preoperative treatment with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in resectable LA-HNSCC has a high pCR rate with no significant impact on surgical safety. This treatment was found to increase the rate of laryngeal function preservation. However, the effects of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on long-term prognosis in LA-HNSCCs require further study.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Prospective Studies , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/drug therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology
16.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol ; 190: 104112, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37633348

ABSTRACT

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in non-smoking and non-drinking (NSND) individuals appears to be distinct from the traditional head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The incidence of this subset is increasing, as are the number of studies examining its characteristics. NSND OSCC individuals tend to be younger (<45 years) compared to traditional HNSCC patients. The proportion of females in the NSND OSCC cohort is also higher. The tongue is the predominantly affected subsite. Studies have revealed several gene mutations and unique epigenomic profiles but no definitive genetic etiology. Transcriptomic analysis has not found any causative viral agents. Other proposed etiologies include chronic dental trauma, microbiome abnormalities, marijuana consumption, and genetic disorders. There are international efforts to determine the relative prognostic outcome of this unique cohort, but no consensus has been reached. Here, we review the incidence, demographics, subsite, possible etiologies, prognosis, and therapy implications of the NSND OSCC cohort.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/epidemiology , Mouth Neoplasms/etiology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/epidemiology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy
17.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1213716, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37457699

ABSTRACT

Head and neck cancer (HNC) ranks as the sixth most prevalent type of cancer globally and accounts for about 4% of all types of cancer. Among all HNC, most are head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with clinical therapies that include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and multimodal treatments. In recent years, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell immunotherapy has significantly transformed the therapeutic approaches for leukemia and lymphoma and has garnered increased attention as a potential treatment for a wide range of cancers. However, CAR-T immunotherapy in solid tumors, especially HNSCCs, lags significantly behind due to the paucity of tumor-specific antigens, high levels of tumor heterogeneity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, the risk of treatment-related toxicities and off-target adverse events in HNSCCs. The objective of this review is to explore the advancement of CAR-T cell therapy in the treatment of HNSCCs. We aim to outline the targeted antigens in HNSCCs, highlight the challenges and potential solutions, and discuss the relevant combination therapies. Our review presents a comprehensive overview of the recent developments in CAR-T cell therapy for HNSCCs, and provides valuable insights into future research avenues.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Humans , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen/metabolism , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/adverse effects , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Antigens, Neoplasm , Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy , Tumor Microenvironment
18.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1135489, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37153589

ABSTRACT

Mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are the seventh most common cancer, with approximately 50% of patients living beyond 5 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown promising results in patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) disease, however, only a subset of patients benefit from immunotherapy. Studies have implicated the tumor microenvironment (TME) of HNSCC as a major factor in therapy response, highlighting the need to better understand the TME, particularly by spatially resolved means to determine cellular and molecular components. Here, we employed targeted spatial profiling of proteins on a cohort of pre-treatment tissues from patients with R/M disease to identify novel biomarkers of response within the tumor and stromal margins. By grouping patient outcome categories into response or non-response, based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) we show that immune checkpoint molecules, including PD-L1, B7-H3, and VISTA, were differentially expressed. Patient responders possessed significantly higher tumor expression of PD-L1 and B7-H3, but lower expression of VISTA. Analysis of response subgroups indicated that tumor necrosis factor receptor (TNFR) superfamily members including OX40L, CD27, 4-1BB, CD40, and CD95/Fas, were associated with immunotherapy outcome. CD40 expression was higher in patient-responders than non responders, while CD95/Fas expression was lower in patients with partial response (PR) relative to those with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Furthermore, we found that high 4-1BB expression in the tumor compartment, but not in the stroma, was associated with better overall survival (OS) (HR= 0.28, p-adjusted= 0.040). Moreover, high CD40 expression in tumor regions (HR= 0.27, p-adjusted= 0.035), and high CD27 expression in the stroma (HR= 0.2, p-adjusted=0.032) were associated with better survival outcomes. Taken together, this study supports the role of immune checkpoint molecules and implicates the TNFR superfamily as key players in immunotherapy response in our cohort of HNSCC. Validation of these findings in a prospective study is required to determine the robustness of these tissue signatures.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Immune Checkpoint Proteins , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Immune Checkpoint Proteins/genetics , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , B7-H1 Antigen/metabolism , Tumor Microenvironment , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Immunotherapy/methods , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor
19.
Head Neck ; 45(7): 1761-1771, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37141438

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data about patient-reported outcomes (PROs) among patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are sparse. Our exploratory study evaluated PROs in patients with HNSCC starting treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy or combination therapy with cetuximab. METHODS: Patients were recruited prior to receipt of their first checkpoint inhibitor therapy infusion. Participants completed measures of checkpoint inhibitor toxicities and quality of life (QOL) at on-treatment clinic visits. RESULTS: Among patients treated with checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (n = 48) or combination therapy (n = 38) toxicity increased over time (p < 0.05), while overall QOL improved from baseline to 12 weeks, with stable or declining QOL thereafter (p < 0.05). There were no group differences in change in toxicity index or QOL. Toxicity index scores were significantly higher in the combination group at 18-20 weeks and 6 months post-initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (p < 0.05). There were no significant group differences at baseline, the 6-8 week (p = 0.13) or 3-month (p = 0.09) evaluations. The combination group reported better emotional well-being at baseline than the monotherapy group (p = 0.04), There were no other group differences QOL at baseline or later timepoints. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increasing patient-reported toxicity, checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy and combination therapy were associated with similar transient improvements, then worsening, of QOL in patients with HNSCC.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/etiology , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
20.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 25(10): 3032-3041, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37059932

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patients with recurrent inoperable squamous-cell head-neck cancer (HNSCC) after chemo-radiotherapy have an ominous prognosis. Re-irradiation can be applied with some efficacy and high toxicity rates. Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy is effective in 25% of patients. Immunogenic death produced by large radiotherapy (RT) fractions may enhance immune response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated the efficacy and tolerance of ultra-hypofractionated immuno-radiotherapy (uhypo-IRT) in 17 patients with recurrent HNSCC and 1 with melanoma. Four of HNSCC patients also had oligometastatic disease. Using a dose/time/toxicity-based algorithm, 7, 7 and 4 patients received 1, 2 and 3 fractions of 8 Gy to the tumor, respectively. Nivolumab anti-PD-1 immunotherapy was administered concurrently with RT and continued for 24 cycles, or until disease progression or manifestation of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). RESULTS: Early and late RT toxicities were minimal. Three patients developed irAEs (16%). After the 12th cycle, 7/17 (41.2%) and 5/17 (29.4%) patients with HNSCC showed complete (CR) and partial response (PR), respectively. CR was also achieved in the melanoma patient. The objective response rates in HNSCC patients were 57%, 86% and 66%, after 1, 2 and 3 fractions, respectively (overall response rate 70.6%). Most responders experienced an increase in peripheral lymphocyte counts. The median time to progression was 10 months. The 3-year projected locoregional progression-free survival was 35%, while the 3-year disease-specific overall survival was 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-PD1 uhypo-IRT is safe and effective in patients with recurrent HNSCC. The high objective response rates and the long survival without evidence of disease support further trials on uhypo-IRT.


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Melanoma , Re-Irradiation , Humans , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/etiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/therapy , Immunotherapy/adverse effects , Melanoma/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...