Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 136, 2021 03 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711933

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Abiraterone is a medication frequently used for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. We report a case of non-sustained episodes of TdP associated with severe hypokalemia due to androgen-deprivation therapy. Few case presentations describe this association; the novelty lies in the potentially lethal cardiovascular events among cancer patients receiving hormonal therapy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 70-year-old male presented with recurrent syncope without prodrome. ECG revealed frequent ventricular ectopy, non-sustained episodes of TdP, and severe hypomagnesemia and hypokalemia. During potassium and magnesium infusion for repletion, the patient underwent temporary transvenous atrial pacing. As part of the work-up, coronary angiography revealed a mild coronary artery disease, and transthoracic echocardiogram showed a moderately depressed ejection fraction. After electrolyte disturbances were corrected, the QT interval normalized, and transvenous pacing was no longer necessary. Abiraterone was discontinued during the admission, and the patient returned to baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer treatment is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach. We presented a case of non-sustained TdP associated with androgen-deprivation therapy in an elderly patient with mild coronary artery disease and moderately reduced ejection fraction. Close follow-up and increased awareness are required in patients with hormonal treatment, especially in the setting of other cardiovascular risk factors.


Subject(s)
Abiraterone Acetate/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Heart Rate/drug effects , Long QT Syndrome/chemically induced , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Syncope/chemically induced , Torsades de Pointes/chemically induced , Aged , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial , Fluid Therapy , Humans , Long QT Syndrome/diagnostic imaging , Long QT Syndrome/physiopathology , Long QT Syndrome/therapy , Male , Syncope/diagnosis , Syncope/physiopathology , Syncope/therapy , Torsades de Pointes/diagnosis , Torsades de Pointes/physiopathology , Torsades de Pointes/therapy , Treatment Outcome
3.
Lancet Oncol ; 20(5): 686-700, 2019 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30987939

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the interim analyses of the LATITUDE study, the addition of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) led to a significant improvement in overall survival and radiographic progression-free survival compared with placebos plus ADT in men with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). Here, we present long-term survival outcomes and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and ADT from the final analysis of the LATITUDE study. METHODS: This is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial done at 235 sites in 34 countries. Eligible patients (men aged ≥18 years) had newly diagnosed, histologically or cytologically confirmed prostate cancer with metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2, and at least two of the three high-risk prognostic factors (Gleason score of ≥8, presence of three or more lesions on bone scan, or presence of measurable visceral metastasis except lymph node metastasis). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive abiraterone acetate (1000 mg) once daily orally plus prednisone (5 mg) once daily orally and ADT (abiraterone acetate plus prednisone group) or matching placebos plus ADT (placebo group); each treatment cycle was 28 days. Randomisation was done by a centralised interactive web response system in a country-by-country scheme using permuted block randomisation, stratified by presence of visceral disease and ECOG performance status. The coprimary endpoint of overall survival was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01715285 and is complete. FINDINGS: Between Feb 12, 2013, and Dec 11, 2014, 1209 patients were screened, of whom ten were ineligible because of study site violations. 1199 patients were randomly assigned to either the abiraterone acetate plus prednisone group (n=597) or placebo group (n=602). After the results of the first interim analysis (cutoff date Oct 31, 2016), the study was unmasked to patients and investigators, and patients in the placebo group were allowed to cross over to receive abiraterone acetate and prednisone plus ADT treatment as per a protocol amendment (Feb 15, 2017) in an open-label extension phase of the study (up to 18 months from the protocol amendment). This final analysis (data cutoff Aug 15, 2018) was done after a median follow-up of 51·8 months (IQR 47·2-57·0) and 618 deaths (275 [46%] of 597 in the abiraterone acetate plus prednisone group and 343 [57%] of 602 in the placebo group). Overall survival was significantly longer in the abiraterone acetate plus prednisone group (median 53·3 months [95% CI 48·2-not reached]) than in the placebo group (36·5 months [33·5-40·0]), with a hazard ratio of 0·66 (95% CI 0·56-0·78; p<0·0001). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension (125 [21%] in the abiraterone acetate plus prednisone group vs 60 [10%] in the placebo group vs three [4%] in the 72 patients who crossed over from placebo to abiraterone acetate plus prednisone) and hypokalaemia (70 [12%] vs ten [2%] vs two [3%]). Serious adverse events of any grade occurred in 192 (32%) of 597 patients in the abiraterone acetate plus prednisone group, 151 (25%) of 602 in the placebo group, and four (6%) of 72 in the crossover group. The most common treatment-related serious adverse event was hypokalaemia (four [1%] patients in the abiraterone acetate plus prednisone group and none in the other groups). Treatment-related deaths occurred in three (<1%) patients each in the abiraterone acetate plus prednisone group (gastric ulcer perforation, sudden death, and cerebrovascular accident) and the placebo group (sudden death, cerebrovascular accident, and pneumonia), with none in the crossover group. INTERPRETATION: The combination of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone with ADT was associated with significantly longer overall survival than placebos plus ADT in men with newly diagnosed high-risk mCSPC and had a manageable safety profile. These findings support the use of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone as a standard of care in patients with high-risk mCSPC. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.


Subject(s)
Abiraterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Abiraterone Acetate/adverse effects , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Metastasis , Orchiectomy , Progression-Free Survival , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Time Factors
7.
Value Health ; 21(4): 416-422, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29680098

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Treatment landscape in prostate cancer has changed dramatically with the emergence of new medicines in the past few years. The traditional survival partition model (SPM) cannot accurately predict long-term clinical outcomes because it is limited by its ability to capture the key consequences associated with this changing treatment paradigm. The objective of this study was to introduce and validate a discrete-event simulation (DES) model for prostate cancer. METHODS: A DES model was developed to simulate overall survival (OS) and other clinical outcomes based on patient characteristics, treatment received, and disease progression history. We tested and validated this model with clinical trial data from the abiraterone acetate phase III trial (COU-AA-302). The model was constructed with interim data (55% death) and validated with the final data (96% death). Predicted OS values were also compared with those from the SPM. RESULTS: The DES model's predicted time to chemotherapy and OS are highly consistent with the final observed data. The model accurately predicts the OS hazard ratio from the final data cut (predicted: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64-0.85 and final actual: 0.74; 95% CI 0.6-0.88). The log-rank test to compare the observed and predicted OS curves indicated no statistically significant difference between observed and predicted curves. However, the predictions from the SPM based on interim data deviated significantly from the final data. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that a DES model with properly developed risk equations presents considerable improvements to the more traditional SPM in flexibility and predictive accuracy of long-term outcomes.


Subject(s)
Abiraterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Computer Simulation , Decision Support Techniques , Models, Theoretical , Process Assessment, Health Care , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Abiraterone Acetate/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Clinical Decision-Making , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Patient Selection , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Reproducibility of Results , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
8.
Trials ; 18(1): 457, 2017 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28978327

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The value of continuation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains controversial and clear evidence is lacking. Argumentation for cessation of LHRH therapy is the prolonged suppression of testosterone levels after the withdrawal of LHRH analogues and the fact that disease progression occurs despite castration levels of testosterone. Especially upon treatment with the life-prolonging cytochrome P450 17-alpha-hydroxylase (Cyp17)-inhibitor, abiraterone, which has the ability to further suppress testosterone serum levels over LHRH therapy alone, continuation of LHRH therapy seems to be negligible. However, the proven increase of luteinizing hormone levels after LHRH withdrawal, which is even further increased by abiraterone, may counteract the effects of abiraterone by the induction of enzymes of steroidogenesis. Therefore, cessation of LHRH therapy when starting treatment with abiraterone in CRPC may display an unpredictable hazard to the patients. This study will explore the role of continuation of LHRH therapy when starting treatment with abiraterone in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, chemotherapy-naïve CPRC. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial will assess radiographic progression-free survival after 12 months of treatment with abiraterone/prednisone in patients who will be randomized to receive continuing LHRH therapy versus LHRH withdrawal at the time of starting abiraterone therapy. DISCUSSION: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, exploratory phase-II trial will bring about new data regarding the efficacy and safety of abiraterone/prednisone treatment with or without continuation of LHRH therapy. In addition, further insight into the complex hormonal changes under treatment will be gained and the results of this trial may give rise to a larger phase-III trial to examine the possibility of withdrawing LHRH therapy in patients with CRPC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02077634 . Registered on 9 December 2013.


Subject(s)
Abiraterone Acetate/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/administration & dosage , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Abiraterone Acetate/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Germany , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Risk Factors , Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase/antagonists & inhibitors , Steroid 17-alpha-Hydroxylase/metabolism , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur Urol ; 72(1): 10-13, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28314611

ABSTRACT

In the COU-AA-302 trial, abiraterone acetate plus prednisone significantly increased overall survival for patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Limited information exists regarding response to subsequent androgen signaling-directed therapies following abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with mCRPC. We investigated clinical outcomes associated with subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (55 patients) and enzalutamide (33 patients) in a post hoc analysis of COU-AA-302. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response was assessed. Median time to PSA progression was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PSA response rate (≥50% PSA decline, unconfirmed) was 44% and 67%, respectively. The median time to PSA progression was 3.9 mo (range 2.6-not estimable) for subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone and 2.8 mo (range 1.8-not estimable) for subsequent enzalutamide. The majority of patients (68%) received intervening chemotherapy before subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide. While acknowledging the limitations of post hoc analyses and high censoring (>75%) in both treatment groups, these results suggest that subsequent therapy with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide for patients who progressed on abiraterone acetate is associated with limited clinical benefit. PATIENT SUMMARY: This analysis showed limited clinical benefit for subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following initial treatment with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone. This analysis does not support prioritization of subsequent abiraterone acetate plus prednisone or enzalutamide following initial therapy with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone.


Subject(s)
Abiraterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Phenylthiohydantoin/analogs & derivatives , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Abiraterone Acetate/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Benzamides , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Disease Progression , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Humans , Kallikreins/blood , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Neoplasm Metastasis , Nitriles , Phenylthiohydantoin/adverse effects , Phenylthiohydantoin/therapeutic use , Prednisone/adverse effects , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
11.
Eur Urol ; 68(4): 570-7, 2015 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25985882

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) often involves bone, and bone-targeted therapy (BTT) has become part of the overall treatment strategy. OBJECTIVE: Investigation of outcomes for concomitant BTT in a post hoc analysis of the COU-AA-302 trial, which demonstrated an overall clinical benefit of abiraterone acetate (AA) plus prednisone over placebo plus prednisone in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This report describes the third interim analysis (prespecified at 55% overall survival [OS] events) for the COU-AA-302 trial. INTERVENTION: Patients were grouped by concomitant BTT use or no BTT use. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Radiographic progression-free survival and OS were coprimary end points. This report describes the third interim analysis (prespecified at 55% OS events) and involves patients treated with or without concomitant BTT during the COU-AA-302 study. Median follow-up for OS was 27.1 mo. Median time-to-event variables with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs), 95% CIs, and p values for concomitant BTT versus no BTT were obtained via Cox models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: While the post hoc nature of the analysis is a limitation, superiority of AA and prednisone versus prednisone alone was demonstrated for clinical outcomes with or without BTT use. Compared with no BTT use, concomitant BTT significantly improved OS (HR 0.75; p=0.01) and increased the time to ECOG deterioration (HR 0.75; p<0.001) and time to opiate use for cancer-related pain (HR 0.80; p=0.036). The safety profile of concomitant BTT with AA was similar to that reported for AA in the overall intent-to-treat population. Osteonecrosis of the jaw (all grade 1/2) with concomitant BTT use was reported in <3% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: AA with concomitant BTT was safe and well tolerated in men with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. The benefits of AA on clinical outcomes were increased with concomitant BTT. PATIENT SUMMARY: Treatment of advanced prostate cancer often includes bone-targeted therapy. This post hoc analysis showed that in patients with advanced prostate cancer who were treated with abiraterone acetate and prednisone in combination with bone-targeted therapy, there was a continued trend in prolongation of life when compared with patients treated with prednisone alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00887198.


Subject(s)
Abiraterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Abiraterone Acetate/adverse effects , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw/etiology , Bone Density Conservation Agents/adverse effects , Bone Neoplasms/mortality , Bone Neoplasms/secondary , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Odds Ratio , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Proportional Hazards Models , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
12.
Eur J Endocrinol ; 172(6): R263-80, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25637072

ABSTRACT

Steroidogenesis enzyme inhibitors are the mainstay of medical therapy in Cushing's syndrome (CS). Ketoconazole (KTZ) and metyrapone are the most commonly used agents. Although there is considerable experience of their use in individual specialist centres, these drugs have not been rigorously tested in prospective clinical trials. Clinicians face uncertainties and concerns with respect to the safety profile of these agents, and best means to monitor effect. We review steroidogenesis inhibitors in the management of CS, including older agents (KTZ, metyrapone, etomidate and mitotane) and those currently under development (LCI699, non-racemic KTZ), and offer a practical approach for their use in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Cushing Syndrome/drug therapy , Etomidate , Imidazoles , Ketoconazole , Metyrapone , Mitotane , Pyridines , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors , Etomidate/administration & dosage , Etomidate/adverse effects , Etomidate/pharmacology , Humans , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Ketoconazole/administration & dosage , Ketoconazole/adverse effects , Ketoconazole/pharmacology , Metyrapone/administration & dosage , Metyrapone/adverse effects , Metyrapone/pharmacology , Mitotane/administration & dosage , Mitotane/adverse effects , Mitotane/pharmacology , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridines/pharmacology , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/pharmacology
13.
Eur Urol ; 67(3): 441-7, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24508071

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although abiraterone acetate (abiraterone) has proven efficacy in two randomised phase 3 trials in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), patients who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) ≥2 were either excluded or under-represented in these trials. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in ECOG PS 0-1 and ≥2 in mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cancer registries from three Canadian centres were used to retrospectively identify mCRPC patients (postdocetaxel and docetaxel-naïve) treated with abiraterone. ECOG PS, clinicopathologic characteristics, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, and survival data were collected. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to examine the effect of clinicopathologic characteristics on overall survival (OS) and time to PSA progression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 519 patients were identified; 61% (n=318) and 39% (n=201) were ECOG PS 0-1 and ≥2, respectively. ECOG PS 0-1 patients were significantly more likely than PS ≥2 patients to achieve a PSA decline ≥50% from baseline (45% vs 32%; p=0.003, Fisher exact test) and had significantly longer median time to PSA progression (5.2 mo vs 4.1 mo; p=0.023), median treatment duration (7.4 mo vs 4.5 mo; p<0.001), and median OS (20.0 mo vs 9.1 mo; p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, ECOG PS was a significant factor for OS (p<0.001), time to PSA progression (p=0.043), and PSA decline (p=0.002). Potential limitations include the retrospective study design and subjective nature of ECOG PS classification. CONCLUSIONS: ECOG PS ≥2 mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone have inferior outcomes compared with ECOG 0-1 patients, especially in regard to OS. These data indicate that early initiation of abiraterone prior to a decline in PS may be warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY: We found that advanced prostate cancer patients who have worse performance status (PS) derive less benefit from abiraterone, indicating that earlier treatment before PS declines could improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Abiraterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Health Status , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Abiraterone Acetate/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Canada , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors/adverse effects , Disease Progression , Humans , Kallikreins/blood , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/blood , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/pathology , Proportional Hazards Models , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
Clin Cancer Res ; 20(24): 6269-76, 2014 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25336698

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients previously treated with ketoconazole were excluded from phase III trials of abiraterone acetate due to potential overlapping mechanism of action. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical utility of abiraterone and its impact on circulating androgens following ketoconazole. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and prior ketoconazole therapy ≥28 days received abiraterone acetate 1,000 mg daily and prednisone 5 mg twice daily. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with PSA response, defined as ≥30% PSA decline at 12 weeks. H0 = 0.30 versus H1 = 0.50 (α = 0.05, power = 0.83). Circulating androgen levels were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were included in the final analysis. Twenty (51%; 95% confidence interval, 36%-66%) patients had ≥30% PSA decline; the null hypothesis was rejected. Sixteen (41%) had ≥50% PSA decline. Median PFS (progression-free survival) was 16 weeks; median radiographic PFS (rPFS) was 36 weeks. Samples for measurement of baseline androgens were available in 37 patients. The PSA response proportion was 59% in 29 patients with DHEA ≥ limit of quantitation (LOQ), compared with 13% in 8 patients with DHEA < LOQ (P = 0.042). Median PFS was 6 and 16 weeks in DHEA < LOQ and DHEA ≥ LOQ patients, respectively (P = 0.017); median rPFS was 14 and 36 weeks in DHEA < LOQ and DHEA ≥ LOQ patients, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Abiraterone demonstrates modest clinical efficacy in mCRPC patients previously treated with ketoconazole. Patients with DHEA ≥ LOQ were more likely to demonstrate PSA responses and longer PFS. Analysis of circulating androgens merits further investigation as a biomarker for response to androgen synthesis inhibitor therapy.


Subject(s)
Androgens/blood , Androstenes/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Abiraterone Acetate , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Androstenes/administration & dosage , Androstenes/adverse effects , Humans , Ketoconazole/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Retreatment , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Steroid Synthesis Inhibitors/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...