Rebamipide gargle and benzydamine gargle in prevention and management of chemo-radiotherapy and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients (randomized clinical trial).

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the preventive and therapeutic effects of rebamipide gargle in comparison with benzydamine in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Phase III randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 2021 till August 2022 on one hundred patients with head and neck cancer receiving high doses of radiotherapy. These patients were equally allocated into either rebamipide group or benzydamine group, The measured outcomes were the incidence of oral mucositis ≥ grade1, according to the WHO mucositis scale, in addition to the duration, and the onset of oral mucositis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups, regarding the incidence of a severe grade of oral mucositis (WHO grades 3), as well as the onset and duration of oral mucositis. Both gargles succeeded to prevent the development of WHO grade 4 oral mucositis. Side effects reported were mainly burning sensation in benzydamine group and nausea in rebamipide group. CONCLUSION: Rebamipide mouthwash was as beneficial as benzydamine mouthwash in minimizing the incidence of severe oral mucositis induced by treatment of head and neck cancer. However, rebamipide gargle proved to be superior to benzydamine in terms of reduction in the severity of the radiation-induced oral mucositis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered in the protocol Registration and Result system of Clinical Trials (Registration ID: NCT04685395)0.28-12-2020.

The Efficacy of Three Different Oral Hygiene Regimens in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Pediatric Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis is one of the side effects developed post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of a mouthwash mixture (lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, pheniramine) versus hyaluronic acid and a solution of sodium bicarbonate in terms of healing time and weight gain in the treatment of oral mucositis in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with hemato-oncological malignancies. METHODS: A total of 171 patients that received chemotherapy for the hematopoietic stem cell transplant were divided into three groups; group 1, treated with a mixed mouthwash of lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, and pheniramine; group 2, treated with hyaluronic acid; and group 3, treated with an aqueous solution of 5% sodium bicarbonate. Weight and mucositis scale scores derived from medical records of patients. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the mucositis scale scores between the groups on the transplant day and days 5, 10, 15 and 20 after the transplantation. At these measurement points, Group 2 (receiving hyaluronic acid) had a lower score, and Group 3 (who received sodium bicarbonate) had a higher score, especially on days 5 and 10 after the transplantation. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that hyaluronic acid is a more effective treatment option than the other oral care solutions that are frequently used for prophylaxis and treatment of oral mucositis.

Decision-making on peri-implant mucositis management and treatment approaches.

Peri-implant mucositis is characterised by inflammation of soft tissues surrounding a dental implant without associated bone loss beyond initial remodelling. Early detection and timely intervention are critical to prevent its progression to peri-implantitis. This paper focuses on various treatment options for treating peri-implant mucositis. The cornerstone of professional treatment lies in the mechanical disruption and removal of microbial biofilms around the implant. This can be achieved through careful use of manual or powered instruments, such as ultrasonic scalers or air polishing devices. However, there is a need for further research to determine the most effective single approach for treating peri-implant mucositis. Current evidence does not support the combination of mechanical debridement with locally administered antibiotics. Contrarily, evidence strongly supports the removal, cleaning, and modifications of prostheses to improve both self-performance and professional cleanability. The use of adjunctive therapies like photodynamic therapy and diode laser, in conjunction with mechanical instrumentation, is not currently recommended due to the limited strength of available evidence. Preventive measures emphasise the importance of comprehensive oral hygiene care, encompassing professional guidance and at-home practices, to manage biofilms effectively. This encompasses oral hygiene instruction, regular debridement, and maintenance care. Supporting peri-implant therapy is also vital for ongoing implant monitoring, preventing the recurrence of mucositis, and halting its progression to peri-implantitis. This multifaceted approach is key to effectively managing and treating peri-implant mucositis.

Clinical efficacy and applicability of natural products in the treatment and prevention of radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis: A systematic review.

The aim of this systematic review was to describe the efficacy and acceptability of natural products in the management of oral mucositis caused by radiation. From the day it started to August 7, 2023, a thorough search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was carried out among seven databases: the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, OVID, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and the CINAHL database. Only English-language articles were identified during the search. Using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, version 2, two researchers screened the articles, collected information on study characteristics, and appraised risks of bias. The data were analyzed and descriptively presented with a narrative synthesis methodology involving the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) reporting element applied in detail. The PROSPERO registration number of this study is CRD42023476932. Thirty-six clinical trials were included in the study; the included studies included a variety of 20 types of natural products. Honey and Curcuma longa were the most commonly assessed natural products. A total of 2,400 participants reported taking part in therapy with natural products for oral mucositis. Natural products demonstrated substantial efficacy in terms of influencing intensity, incidence, pain score, quality of life, and symptoms such as xerostomia and dysphagia. Except for manuka honey, most natural products were well accepted. Regarding the clinical trials' risk of bias, 2 clinical trials (5.56%) had a high risk of bias, 17 studies (47.2%) had a low risk of bias, and 17 studies (47.2%) were rated with "some concern." Natural remedies work well as alternate treatments for managing oral mucositis caused by radiation therapy. However, additional clinical trials are still needed. The safety of these conventional medications as well as their effectiveness and safety when used in combination with other conventional or naturopathic therapies should be fully examined.

Systemic Anti-Inflammatory Agents in the Prevention of Chemoradiation-Induced Mucositis: A Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Mucositis is a pathological condition characterised by inflammation and ulceration of the mucous membranes lining the alimentary canal, particularly in the mouth (oral mucositis) and the gastrointestinal tract. It is a common side effect of cancer treatments, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, and it is sometimes responsible for treatment interruptions. Preventing mucositis throughout the alimentary tract is therefore crucial. However, current interventions mainly target either oral or gastrointestinal side effects. This review aimed to investigate the use of systemically administered anti-inflammatory agents to prevent mucositis in cancer patients undergoing cancer treatment. PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov were screened to identify eligible randomised controlled trials (RCTs). The published literature on anti-inflammatory agents provides mixed evidence regarding the degree of efficacy in preventing/reducing the severity of mucositis in most anticancer treatments; however, sample size continued to be a significant limitation, alongside others discussed. Our review yielded a list of several anti-inflammatory agents that exhibit potential mucositis-preventive effects in cancer patients undergoing cancer treatment, which can be used to inform clinical practice.

Emerging pharmacotherapy trends in preventing and managing oral mucositis induced by chemoradiotherapy and targeted agents.

INTRODUCTION: The introduction of targeted therapy and immunotherapy has tremendously changed the clinical outcomes and prognosis of cancer patients. Despite innovative pharmacological therapies and improved radiotherapy (RT) techniques, patients continue to suffer from side effects, of which oral mucositis (OM) is still the most impactful, especially for quality of life. AREAS COVERED: We provide an overview of current advances in cancer pharmacotherapy and RT, in relation to their potential to cause OM, and of the less explored and more recent literature reports related to the best management of OM. We have analyzed natural/antioxidant agents, probiotics, mucosal protectants and healing coadjuvants, pharmacotherapies, immunomodulatory and anticancer agents, photobiomodulation and the impact of technology. EXPERT OPINION: The discovery of more precise pathophysiologic mechanisms of CT and RT-induced OM has outlined that OM has a multifactorial origin, including direct effects, oxidative damage, upregulation of immunologic factors, and effects on oral flora. A persistent upregulated immune response, associated with factors related to patients' characteristics, may contribute to more severe and long-lasting OM. The goal is strategies to conjugate individual patient, disease, and therapy-related factors to guide OM prevention or treatment. Despite further high-quality research is warranted, the issue of prevention is paramount in future strategies.

Implementation of a light therapy team to administer photobiomodulation therapy: A standardized protocol to prevent and treat oral mucositis in the pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant population.

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis (OM) is a painful and common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The Children's Oncology Group recently published guidelines recommending photobiomodulation (PBM) for preventing and treating OM in pediatric HSCT patients. However, this is a rarely used intervention in pediatric hospitals. PROCEDURE: Patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT, or autologous HSCT for a neuroblastoma diagnosis, had PBM administered from the first day of conditioning to transplant Day +20. We successfully developed a standardized treatment protocol and workflow to ensure consistent and uniform delivery of PBM. In addition, clinical patient data were compared before and after PBM implementation. RESULTS: The administration of PBM at our center was feasible, but required dedicated staff. A registered nurse (RN) was determined to be the best fit to deliver PBM. Sixty-two patients received PBM from October 2022 to September 2023; patients from 2021 before PBM implementation were used for comparison. Patients receiving PBM were more likely (p = .03) to engage in teeth brushing (56/62 = 90%) compared to baseline (61/81 = 75%). Mean days of OM decreased from 11.3 to 9 days; patients who received PBM were less likely (p < .001) to be discharged on total parental nutrition (TPN) (11/62 = 18%) compared to baseline (50/82 = 61%). OM-related supportive care costs (TPN and patient-controlled anesthesia [PCA]) were lower (p = .02) for those who received PBM (median cost = $31,229.87 vs. $37,370.66). CONCLUSION: PBM, as the standard of care in the pediatric HSCT population, is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated. At our center, a dedicated RN was critical to providing standardized treatment and ensuring sustainability.

Prevention and Treatment of Oral Mucositis in Pediatric Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common and serious side effect of cancer treatment. The incidence of chemotherapy-induced OM in pediatric patients can reach up to 91.5% and has a major impact on patients' quality of life. The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of current interventions and agents for the management of OM in children undergoing chemo/radiotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases from January 2000 until March 2023. Thirty-four randomized studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified and five RCTs investigating the efficacy of Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) intervention or the agent honey were included in the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The meta-analysis of two RCTs indicated that topical application of honey on oral mucosa was effective in shortening the mean duration of hospital stay in children with severe OM (MD=-4.33, p=0.002). However, LLLT was not found to be effective for the prevention or treatment of OM grade ≥II (RR=0.99, p=0.99). Moreover, the therapeutic application of LLLT did not show significant benefit for lower risk of OM grade ≥II (RR=0.48, p=0.58). CONCLUSION: Various interventions and agents were examined in the present study for the management of OM. Honey could be a promising candidate for the treatment of OM in pediatric patients. Further high-quality RCTs are required to enhance our findings.

Preventive versus curative photobiomodulation for oral mucositis in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: which approach is more effective?

PURPOSE: There is increasing evidence that photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy is both an effective and safe approach in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for both prevention and management of oral mucositis (OM), but its use in clinical practice is still limited and the timing of application is under discussion. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate possible differences between patients treated either with preventive or curative PBM therapy. METHODS: The retrospective case series included 24 patients suffering from multiple myeloma who underwent the same conditioning and transplantation protocol. Patients were treated either with preventive PBM starting from the first day of conditioning up to two days post-HSCT or with curative PBM (starting at OM onset for four consecutive days). OM score, pain, and functional parameters were recorded. RESULTS: All patients developed OM. Preventive PBM was significantly more effective in reducing OM severity (p < 0.0001) and pain (p < 0.0001) post-HSCT than curative PBM. Furthermore, we found a lower number of patients reporting discomfort in all subjective parameters (pain during swallowing, chewing, and speaking) in the preventive PBM group. No adverse events related to PBM therapy were recorded in both groups. CONCLUSION: The timing for PBM therapy in patients undergoing HSCT is crucial: when started on the first day of conditioning, it significantly reduces both pain and OM severity, providing an important benefit also in subjective oral functions such as speaking, swallowing, and chewing, thus increasing the overall adherence to the oncological therapies.

Effectiveness of intraoral stents in reducing oral adverse events during radiotherapy for maxillary or nasal cavity malignant tumors.

PURPOSE: Many patients experience oral adverse events during head and neck cancer radiotherapy (RT). The methods of management of such events are under debate. One such technique is the intraoral stent (IOS) technique, which removes normal tissue from the irradiation field. This retrospective study examined the factors associated with the occurrence of oral mucositis (OM) and dysgeusia and the efficacy of IOSs in preventing them. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients who underwent RT in the maxilla or nasal cavity between 2016 and 2022 were included. They were investigated for background characteristics, treatment factors (IOS and dose-volume histogram), and oral adverse events (OM and dysgeusia). RESULTS: Significant risk factors for the incidence of grade ≥ 2 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0) OM were the non-use of IOSs (p = 0.004) and diabetes (p = 0.025). A significant risk factor for the incidence of grade ≥ 1 dysgeusia was concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.019). The radiation dose to the tongue was significantly lower in the IOS group than in the non-IOS group. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the use of an IOS during RT reduces the severity of OM by reducing irradiation to the tongue. Therefore, the use of an IOS is recommended during RT performed in the maxilla or nasal cavity.

Effectiveness of gold nanoparticles in prevention and treatment of oral mucositis in animal models: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis remains a significant complication during cancer therapy with no effective treatment. Gold nanoparticles offer anti-inflammatory, antioxidant properties with low toxicity. This study systematically reviews the literature assessing gold nanoparticles in the management of oral mucositis in animal models. METHODS: A literature search was undertaken using MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, using the format for Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation. Prior to the review, the protocol was registered in the systematic review register, PROSPERO (registration no. CRD42021272169). Outcome measures included ulceration, histopathological scores, inflammatory mediators, microbial growth, and pain. Study quality was analysed by SYRCLE risk-of-bias tool. RESULTS: Only one study met the inclusion criteria, documenting reduction in ulceration, inflammatory, and oxidative biomarkers. Exposure to AuNPs prevented inflammatory response induced by 5-fluorouracil in oral mucosa of hamsters. However, a high risk of bias necessitates further research. CONCLUSION: This review identifies a potential therapeutic strategy for prevention and management of oral mucositis. It also provides future direction for gold nanoparticle research in oral mucositis; however, there is lack of sufficient evidence to derive any conclusion. Research with standardized parameters including nanoparticle size, capping agent, surface charge, and appropriate oral mucositis animal models will establish risk-benefit balance and margin of safety for therapeutic use of gold nanoparticles for oral mucositis.

Impact of photobiomodulation for prevention of oral mucositis on the quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review.

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the impact of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for the prevention of oral mucositis (OM) on the quality of life (QoL) of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) undergoing radiation therapy. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The search strategy was performed in five electronic databases (Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). The included studies assessed the QoL of patients undergoing radiation therapy (RT) for HNC and undergoing PBMT for the management of OM. Seven articles met the eligibility criteria. Data extraction was performed in the selected studies including the PBMT parameters (active medium, application procedure, wavelength, fluence, power, irradiance, irradiation time, spot size, energy per point, schedule of irradiation, and total energy). The included studies were qualitatively analyzed, and descriptive analyses were performed. Also, summary results were evaluated for group comparison analysis. All included studies confirmed a decrease in the QoL of the patients that developed OM throughout the RT progress when compared to baseline. Of the informed cases, most of the patients who received PBMT showed grades 1 and 2 OM, while the control group showed more individuals with severe forms of OM (grades 3 and 4). In this sense, patients submitted to PBMT reported better QoL at the end of the treatment compared with the control group. PBMT used for the management of OM preserves the QoL of patients with head and neck cancer.

Window therapeutic of extraoral photobiomodulation for prevention of oral mucositis in HSCT patients: additional arm.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 1W extraoral photobiomodulation (EOPBM) and to compare with our previous results of 2W EOPBM and intraoral photobiomodulation (IOPBM) protocols in the management of oral mucositis (OM) related to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). METHODS: A total of 30 patients underwent autologous or allogenic HSCT. Experimental protocol of 1W EOPBM was performed daily beginning in the first day of the conditioning regimen until 5 days after transplantation. The application areas included six points on the face and three points on the cervical area. Additional application of IOPBM was performed if patients had ulcered mucositis. Its severity was assessed daily according to WHO (World Health Organization) and NCI (National Cancer Institute) scales. Oral and oropharynx pains were scored daily by visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: The 1W EOPBM protocol was well tolerated without any complaints. Of total, 13 patients were male and 17 were female and the mean age was 49.3 years old. Most patients (21 patients - 70%) received autologous HSCT, and 24 patients (80%) underwent myeloablative conditioning (MAC) regime and 6 patients (20%) reduced intensive conditioning regime. Nineteen patients (63.3%) developed OM according to WHO criteria, 3 patients grade I, 10 grade II and 6 grade III. NCI mucositis grades were similar to WHO grades. OM outcomes of 1W EOPBM were similar when compared to our previous groups and no significant differences were observed. No differences were found between pain and the protocols (1W EOPBM, IOPBM and 2W EOPBM). CONCLUSION: This 1W EOPBM protocol seemed to be as effective as IOPBM and 2W EOPBM in the prevention of OM in HSCT patients. In addition, we might assume that there is a window of application on EOPBM.

Management of radiation-induced oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients: a real-life survey among 25 Italian radiation oncology centers.

AIM: Radiation-induced oral mucositis (RIOM) is the most frequent side effect in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with curative radiotherapy (RT). A standardized strategy for preventing and treating RIOM has not been defined. Aim of this study was to perform a real-life survey on RIOM management among Italian RT centers. METHODS: A 40-question survey was administered to 25 radiation oncologists working in 25 different RT centers across Italy. RESULTS: A total of 1554 HNC patients have been treated in the participating centers in 2021, the majority (median across the centers 91%) with curative intent. Median treatment time was 41 days, with a mean percentage of interruption due to toxicity of 14.5%. Eighty percent of responders provide written oral cavity hygiene recommendations. Regarding RIOM prevention, sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes, oral mucosa barrier agents, and hyaluronic acid-based mouthwashes were the most frequent topic agents used. Regarding RIOM treatment, 14 (56%) centers relied on literature evidence, while internal guidelines were available in 13 centers (44%). Grade (G)1 mucositis is mostly treated with sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes, oral mucosa barrier agents, and steroids, while hyaluronic acid-based agents, local anesthetics, and benzydamine were the most used in mucositis G2/G3. Steroids, painkillers, and anti-inflammatory drugs were the most frequent systemic agents used independently from the RIOM severity. CONCLUSION: Great variety of strategies exist among Italian centers in RIOM management for HNC patients. Whether different strategies could impact patients' compliance and overall treatment time of the radiation course is still unclear and needs further investigation.

A randomised trial of topical polaprezinc to prevent oral mucositis in patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ToPaZ study).

PURPOSE: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common complication in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Polaprezinc, an anti-ulcer drug, has been shown to be effective to prevent OM in several studies when administered topically and systemically. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of topical polaprezinc in patients undergoing HSCT. METHODS: This was an open-label randomised clinical trial comparing polaprezinc and sodium bicarbonate mouthwashes for the prevention of severe OM in HSCT patients. Adult patients who received conditioning regimens at moderate to high risk of developing OM were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of severe (WHO grades 3-4) OM. The secondary endpoints included duration of grades 3-4 OM, incidence and duration of grades 2-4 OM, patient-reported pain and functional limitations. RESULTS: In total, 108 patients (55 test arm and 53 control arm) were randomised. There was no difference in the incidence of grades 3 to 4 OM (35% test arm versus 36% control arm). The secondary endpoints were not significantly different. In both arms, patients reported more throat pain compared to mouth pain. CONCLUSIONS: Topical polaprezinc had no effect in the prevention of OM in HSCT patients. Further research is required to evaluate the effects of systemic polaprezinc. The OM assessment tool needs to be reviewed as throat mucositis was a main issue in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12320001188921 (Date Registered: 10th November 2020).

Uso da laserterapia de baixa intensidade na prevenção e tratamento da mucosite oral induzida por tratamentos antineoplásicos / Use of low-intensity lasertherapy in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis induced by antineoplastic treatments

Sabe-se que para o combate de células cancerígenas, é imprescindível a submissão de pacientes oncológicos a tratamentos antineoplásicos, sessões de quimioterapia e radioterapia são as terapêuticas mais utilizadas em pacientes neoplásicos, sendo capazes de originar inúmeras reações adversas, como a mucosite oral, que é considerada um dos principais efeitos adversos do tratamento com quimioterapia e radioterapia. A laserterapia vem sendo considerada um grande aliado na prevenção e tratamento da mucosite, visto que de forma preventiva retarda o aparecimento desta condição, e de forma terapêutica proporciona alívio da dor, além de reduzir a gravidade da mucosite oral. Dessa forma, a presente revisão de literatura teve por objetivo denotar os benefícios da laserterapia de baixa intensidade na prevenção e tratamento da mucosite oral induzida por tratamentos antineoplásicos. Para a confecção deste trabalho, foram pesquisados artigos científicos publicados entre 2012 e 2022, nas bases de dados PubMed, Portal BVS, Scielo e google acadêmico, nos idiomas inglês e português. Como resultado foram encontrados 59 trabalhos, onde após leitura dos títulos e resumos, e do tipo de estudo, foram excluídos 32 artigos. Sendo 27 selecionados para leitura integral do texto, onde dentre eles somente 19 se encaixaram nos critérios de inclusão e foram utilizados neste trabalho. Portanto, conclui-se que a literatura mostra que embora haja bastante discussão, a maior parte dos estudos mostram evidências que a laserterapia de baixa intensidade possui muitos benefícios na prevenção e no tratamento da mucosite oral devido sua capacidade moduladora nos eventos metabólicos por meio de processos fotofísicos e bioquímicos(AU)

It is known that in order to fight cancer cells, it is essential to submit cancer patients to antineoplastic treatments, chemotherapy and radiotherapy sessions are the most used therapies in cancer patients, being capable of causing numerous adverse reactions, such as oral mucositis, which is considered one of the main adverse effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment. Laser therapy has been considered a great ally in the prevention and treatment of mucositis, since in a preventive way it delays the onset of this condition, and in a therapeutic way it provides pain relief, in addition to reducing the severity of oral mucositis. Thus, the present literature review aims to denote the benefits of low-level laser therapy in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis induced by antineoplastic treatments. For the preparation of this work, scientific articles published between 2012 and 2022 were searched in PubMed, Portal BVS, Scielo and academic google databases, in English and Portuguese. As a result, 59 studies were found, where after reading the titles and abstracts, and the type of study, 32 articles were excluded. 27 were selected for full text reading, among which only 19 met the inclusion criteria and were used in this work. Therefore, it is concluded that the literature shows that, although there is a lot of discussion, most studies show evidence that low-level laser therapy has many benefits in the prevention and treatment of oral mucositis due to its modulating capacity in metabolic events through processes photophysical and biochemical(AU)

A randomized phase II study of acyclovir for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: To prove our hypothesis that acyclovir prophylaxis in autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) recipients with hematologic malignancies (HM) reduces the incidence of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (CIOM) by inhibiting the intraoral HSV reactivation during the neutropenic period, we conducted a randomized phase II study of acyclovir for the prevention of CIOM in adult HSV sero-positive AHSCT recipients. METHODS: Patients were randomized to either the study group (acyclovir 400 mg PO bid until neutrophil engraftment) or the control group (no prophylaxis) and received AHSCT. Oral examination and sampling for HSV were performed at three timepoints of AHSCT. RESULTS: In 54 patients who were randomized (for intention-to-analysis), the incidence of CIOM was 16.0% (4/25 patients) and 58.6% (17/29 patients) in the study group and the control group, respectively (P = 0.001). In 49 patients who completed the study (for per-protocol analysis), the incidence of CIOM was 13.0% (3/23 patients) and 61.5% (16/26 patients) in the study group and the control group, respectively (P = 0.001). In addition, HSV-1 PCR positivity in the study group was significantly lower than that the control group (4.3% vs. 46.2%, P = 0.001). A strong association between the HSV-1 reactivation status and CIOM was reconfirmed. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of oral acyclovir effectively reduced the incidence of CIOM in patients with HM who were undergoing AHSCT. TRIAL REGISTRATIONS: This trial was registered at the Clinical Research Information Service in the Republic of Korea under the number KCT0003885 (registration date 03/05/2019).

Monte Carlo based dosimetry of extraoral photobiomodulation for prevention of oral mucositis.

Photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) is recommended for prevention and treatment of oral mucositis, a painful condition that occurs in cancer patients. Intraoral PBMT is limited to treating distal oral mucosa and oropharynx. Extraoral PBMT may provide a more efficient intervention. The goal of this study was to develop a clinically viable protocol for extraoral PBMT. Monte Carlo modeling was used to predict the distribution of 850 nm light for four treatment sites, using anatomical data obtained from MRI and optical properties from the literature. Simulated incident light power density was limited to 399 mW/cm2 to ensure treatment safety and to prevent tissue temperature increase. The results reveal that total tissue thickness determines fluence rate at the oral mucosa, whereas the thickness of individual tissue layers and melanin content are of minor importance. Due to anatomical differences, the fluence rate varied greatly among patients. Despite these variations, a universal protocol was established using a median treatment time methodology. The determined median treatment times required to deliver efficacious dose between 1 and 6 J/cm2 were within 15 min. The developed PBMT protocol can be further refined using the combination of pretreatment imaging and the Monte Carlo simulation approach implemented in this study.

Preconditioning with Photobiomodulation as an Effective Method in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review.

Background: Given the suffering experienced by cancer patients, effective solutions must be found to prevent the most painful and debilitating side effects of anticancer treatment. The use of photobiomodulation (PBM) with specific parameters has been proposed to prevent oral mucositis in adults undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation as well as in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy alone without chemotherapy. No recommendations were possible for patients undergoing chemotherapy alone. This systematic review aims to analyze the effectiveness of preconditioning by PBM in preventing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Methods: This study was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, PRISMA, Checklist and registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). We searched and identified articles of the subsequent bibliographic databases: PubMed and Cochrane. Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias of studies included in this review. Results: There were only six clinical trials examining the efficacy of PBM therapy in the primary prevention of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis. All of the studies used lasers, except for one study that compared lasers with light-emitting diodes. The wavelength ranges from 630 to 830 nm. Irradiation parameters varied among the included studies. All studies showed good results for the use of PBM in the prevention of oral mucositis except for one study that found no benefit for the laser application. Conclusions: PBM has been shown to be effective in preventing oral mucositis when applied to healthy tissues. Finding the optimal protocol has been difficult due to the variability between studies, and therefore, further well-designed, controlled, blinded studies are recommended to precisely determine irradiation parameters and the number of sessions. This review has been registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under number CRD42023397771.