Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg ; 37(5): 288-297, 2019 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31084561

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine effects of recently developed ultraviolet light-emitting diodes (UV LEDs) wavelengths on in vitro growth and gene expression of cultural periodontopathic bacteria, and on viability of experimental gingival fibroblasts. Materials and methods: Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, and Streptococcus oralis were irradiated by UV LEDs (265, 285, 310, 365, and 448 nm) at 600 mJ/cm2 and grown anaerobically in vitro. The colony forming units were counted after 1 week. Cell morphology was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to investigate gene expression changes by 310 nm irradiation. Viability of the irradiated human gingival fibroblasts was evaluated using WST-8 assay. Results: Both 265 and 285 nm resulted in the complete death of bacteria and fibroblasts, whereas 310 nm caused partial killing and suppression of bacterial growth and much less damage to the fibroblasts in vitro. Both 365 and 448 nm resulted in no significant change. SEM showed that P. gingivalis cells gradually degraded from day 2 or 3 and were severely destructed on day 5 for 265, 285, and 310 nm. The 310 nm irradiation transiently suppressed the transcripts of SOS response- and cell division-relative genes. Conclusions: Both 265 and 285 nm may induce powerful bactericidal effects and severe fibroblast phototoxicity, and 310 nm may induce partial killing or growth suppression of bacterial cells with much less fibroblast phototoxicity. UV lights may have potential for bacterial suppression, with situations dependent on wavelength, in periodontal and peri-implant therapy.


Subject(s)
Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans/radiation effects , Fusobacterium nucleatum/radiation effects , Porphyromonas gingivalis/radiation effects , Prevotella intermedia/radiation effects , Streptococcus oralis/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Therapy , Cell Culture Techniques , Fibroblasts/radiation effects , Gingiva/microbiology , Gingiva/pathology , Gingiva/radiation effects , Humans , Stem Cells
2.
J Biomed Mater Res A ; 105(8): 2321-2328, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28380676

ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the photocatalytic bactericidal effect of nanostructured anatase-rich titanium dioxide (TiO2 ) on microbial biofilms. Commercially pure titanium discs were spin-coated with photocatalytic TiO2 nanoparticles (P25). Uncoated discs were used as control (CTRL). Half of the CTRL and half of the P25-coated surfaces were coated with purified saliva (SAL) to give four different groups (CTRL, CTRL + SAL, P25 and P25 + SAL). Streptococcus oralis were allowed to form biofilms on the discs for 18 h and non-adherent cells were rinsed off. Bacterial viability was assessed at time 0 with Live/Dead BacLight staining and epifluorescence microscopy. The remaining discs were divided into a non-UV group and UVA-irradiated (+UV) group (irradiation time, 6 or 24 h). Thereafter, viability was assessed as above. Viability at time 0 was high and no dead cells were seen on any of the surfaces, even after 24 h, in the absence of UVA. However, after 24 h of exposure, the proportion of viable cells was reduced by 40% on the P25 discs compared to 0 and 6 h, and this effect was enhanced with a salivary pellicle. Members of mixed species biofilms differ in their susceptibility to the bactericidal effect of the surfaces tested and further investigations are needed to optimize the conditions. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 105A: 2321-2328, 2017.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/chemistry , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Biofilms/drug effects , Nanostructures/chemistry , Streptococcus oralis/drug effects , Titanium/chemistry , Titanium/pharmacology , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Biofilms/radiation effects , Catalysis , Humans , Streptococcal Infections/prevention & control , Streptococcus oralis/physiology , Streptococcus oralis/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Rays
3.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol ; 42(6): 20120353, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23420856

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess (1) antimicrobial efficiency of wiping intraoral phosphor plates with alcohol tissues based on ethanol or 2-propanol alcohols after contamination with Candida albicans and Streptococcus oralis, (2) a concept for autodisinfection with ultraviolet light of the transport ramp in a scanner for phosphor plates and (3) the impact of wiping with alcohol tissues on durability of the plate. METHODS: Suspensions of C. albicans and S. oralis were prepared in concentrations of 10(9) and 10(5) organisms per ml, and Digora (Digora(®) Optime Imaging Plate, size 2; Soredex, PalaDEx Group Brenntag Nordic A/S, Hellerup, Denmark) and Vista (VistaScan(®) Imaging Plate PLUS, size 2; Dürr Dental AG, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) plates were contaminated. The plates were wiped with ethanol or 2-propanol disinfectant tissues and imprints obtained on agar. Number of microbial colonies after culturing was recorded. The scanner ramp was contaminated with C. albicans or S. oralis, respectively, the ultraviolet light (UV light) disinfection in the scanner was activated and the number of colonies after culturing was recorded. Plates from each system were sequentially wiped (5-60 times) with ethanol and 2-propanol, exposed and scanned. 48 images from each system were scored blind: 1 = no artefact, 2 = small artefacts and 3 = severe artefacts. RESULTS: Ethanol eliminated C. albicans and S. oralis in high and low concentrations from both types of plates, whereas 2-propanol did not eliminate all micro-organisms at high concentrations. The UV light eliminated all micro-organisms from the ramp. Ethanol degraded the plates to a larger extent than did 2-propanol. Images from Vista plates showed severe artefacts after wiping with ethanol; those from Digora plates did not. CONCLUSIONS: Ethanol eliminated all micro-organisms but degraded phosphor plates, whereas 2-propanol did not eliminate all micro-organisms and still degraded plates from Vista but not from Digora.


Subject(s)
2-Propanol/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents/pharmacology , Dental Disinfectants/pharmacology , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Ethanol/pharmacology , Radiography, Dental, Digital/instrumentation , Artifacts , Bacterial Load , Candida albicans/drug effects , Candida albicans/radiation effects , Colony Count, Microbial , Disinfection/methods , Humans , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Streptococcus oralis/drug effects , Streptococcus oralis/radiation effects , Ultraviolet Rays
4.
Clin Oral Investig ; 15(6): 959-65, 2011 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20821262

ABSTRACT

Effective calculus and biofilm removal is essential to treat periodontitis. Sonic and ultrasonic technologies are used in several scaler applications. This was the first feasibility study to assess the potential of a shock wave device to remove calculus and biofilms and to kill bacteria. Ten extracted teeth with visible subgingival calculus were treated with either shock waves for 1 min at an energy output of 0.4 mJ/mm(2) at 3 Hz or a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler at medium power setting for 1 min, which served as a control. Calculus was determined before and after treatment planimetrically using a custom-made software using a grey scale threshold. In a second experiment, multispecies biofilms were formed on saliva-preconditioned bovine enamel discs during 64.5 h. They were subsequently treated with shock waves or the ultrasonic scaler (N = 6/group) using identical settings. Biofilm detachment and bactericidal effects were then assessed. Limited efficiency of the shock wave therapy in terms of calculus removal was observed: only 5% of the calculus was removed as compared to 100% when ultrasound was used (P ≤ 0.0001). However, shock waves were able to significantly reduce adherent bacteria by three orders of magnitude (P ≤ 0.0001). The extent of biofilm removal by the ultrasonic device was statistically similar. Only limited bactericidal effects were observed using both methods. Within the limitations of this preliminary study, the shock wave device was not able to reliably remove calculus but had the potential to remove biofilms by three log steps. To increase the efficacy, technical improvements are still required. This novel noninvasive intervention, however, merits further investigation.


Subject(s)
Biofilms , Dental Calculus/therapy , High-Energy Shock Waves/therapeutic use , Actinomyces/radiation effects , Animals , Bacterial Load/radiation effects , Biofilms/radiation effects , Candida albicans/radiation effects , Cattle , Dental Calculus/microbiology , Dental Pellicle/microbiology , Dental Scaling/instrumentation , Feasibility Studies , Fusobacterium nucleatum/radiation effects , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Photography, Dental/methods , Radiation Dosage , Streptococcus mutans/radiation effects , Streptococcus oralis/radiation effects , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ultrasonic Therapy/instrumentation , Veillonella/radiation effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...