Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 13.844
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e078198, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38830732

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the correlation between uncertainty stress (US) and depression among healthcare professionals (HCPs) in China. DESIGN, SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted by recruiting HCPs from three provinces in China (central, eastern and western) through purposive sampling between 29 September 2022 and 18 January 2023. US was measured using the Life Stress Questionnaire and depression was measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. In total, 2976 questionnaires were deemed valid. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME: This study examined the prevalence of US and depression among HCPs in China; the correlating sociodemographic traits; and the correlation between US and depression. RESULTS: The prevalence of US and depression among HCPs in China was 26.54% (790 out of 2976) and 71.63% (2132 out of 2976). Binary logistic analysis revealed that individuals with graduate degrees (OR: 1.83; 95% CI 1.07 to 3.11; p<0.05), central China (OR: 1.75; 95% CI 1.36 to 2.24; p<0.01), primary medical institutes (OR: 1.33; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.72; p<0.05), secondary medical institutes (OR: 1.30; 95% CI 1.01 to 1.68; p<0.05), an annual income of less than ¥50 000 (OR: 1.85; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.73; p<0.01) and an income range of ¥50 000-¥99 999 (OR: 1.49; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.03; p<0.05) were associated with a higher likelihood of US. The adjusted logistic regression model demonstrated that HCPs with higher US had a greater likelihood of depression (adjusted OR: 5.02; 95% CI 3.88 to 6.50; p<0.01). The increase in the US score was paralleled by an increased depression score (beta (B): 1.32; 95% CI 1.25 to 1.39; p<0.01). CONCLUSION: These findings reveal a significant correlation between US and depression among HCPs and suggest that improving the management of US may help reduce the prevalence of depression among HCPs.


Subject(s)
Depression , Health Personnel , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , China/epidemiology , Female , Male , Adult , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Uncertainty , Depression/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Young Adult , Logistic Models
2.
J Health Popul Nutr ; 43(1): 76, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831331

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stress, depression and anxiety are prevalent mental health concerns that are getting worse every day in the context of rapidly expanding megacities, where a rising number of people live in slums. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the state of mental health and related variables underlying mental health issues among the impoverished population. METHODOLOGY: A total of 384 slum residents from the Khulna division responded to our questionnaire, which included the DASS-21 and other pertinent questions. Using ordinal logistic regression, the significant factors were extracted. RESULTS: The Cronbach's reliability coefficient for the DASS-21 scale lies between 0.79 and 0.89 which indicates the high reliability of the DASS-21 scales. According to the findings, roughly 72.7%, 84.1%, and 69% of participants slum dwellers experienced anxiety, depression, and anxiety problems respectively. The result of ordinal logistic regression shows, slum dwellers of female gender (B = 0.669*, 95% CI 0.141, 1.197), married (B = 1.506*, 95% CI 0.119, 2.893), having only one earning member in the family (B = 1.224*, 95% CI 0.526, 1.922), day laborers (B = 2.294*, 95% CI 1.115, 3.473), not being able to educate children due to financial problem (B = 0.558*, 95% CI 0.183, 0.932) were more likely to report high levels of anxiety, depression, and stress. CONCLUSION: The study finds that a significant portion of people who live in slums struggle with mental health issues. It also points to the need for further support, intervention, and study on Khulna's slum inhabitants who are experiencing mental health issues. The authors anticipate that the results will spur policymakers and government representatives to enhance financing for slum dwellers and employ psychological intervention strategies, both of which will aid in achieving the Sustainable Development Goal.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Depression , Mental Health , Poverty Areas , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Logistic Models , Depression/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Reproducibility of Results , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent
3.
BMC Psychol ; 12(1): 323, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38824561

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical and health sector employees are always exposed to physical and psychological risk factors, which affects their personal, social and professional performance. It's important to explores the intricate interplay between personality traits, stress levels, and psychosomatic symptoms among nurses as one of the most sensitive jobs in society. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigating the relationship between the personality traits of hardiness and perfectionism with stress and psychosomatic symptoms among nurses. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 340 nurses in Mazandaran, Iran in 2022-2023. The instruments utilized to collect data included four questionnaires, namely Cubasa Hardiness Questionnaire, Tehran Multidimensional Perfectionism Questionnaire, Nursing Stress Questionnaire and Takata and Sakata Psychosomatic Questionnaire. The structural equations modeling was used for path analysis. All analyzes were done using SPSS V.25.0 and AMOS V.24.0 software. RESULTS: The results of the present study revealed that the prevalence of psychosomatic symptoms and stress in nurses was high, and all path coefficients were significant, except for the paths of commitment to stress, challenge to psychosomatic symptoms, self-orientation to psychosomatic symptoms, and community-orientation to psychosomatic symptoms. The results showed that in the final model, the highest coefficient (0.807) is assigned to the other-oriented perfectionism path to psychosomatic symptoms. The weakest coefficient (-0.276) is related to the path of the hardiness component of the challenge to stress. The current research examined the fitting of the proposed model and the suitability of the proposed model was confirmed. CONCLUSION: The results of the present study revealed that psychological factors such as personality traits of hardiness, and perfectionism are among the important and influencing parameters on occupational stress, and psychosomatic symptoms and as a result the efficiency and effectiveness of nurses in working environments. Therefore, it is absolutely necessary to implement mitigating and control measures to reduce the mentioned risk factors among nurses in medical settings.


Subject(s)
Occupational Stress , Perfectionism , Psychophysiologic Disorders , Humans , Iran , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Female , Psychophysiologic Disorders/epidemiology , Psychophysiologic Disorders/psychology , Male , Occupational Stress/psychology , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Nurses/psychology , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Personality , Surveys and Questionnaires , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Resilience, Psychological
4.
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem ; 32: e4173, 2024.
Article in English, Spanish, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695430

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between death distress, psychological adjustment, optimism, pessimism and perceived stress among nurses working during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: this study was designed as cross-sectional/cohort. The population of the study involved 408 nurses from Northern Cyprus, which are registered as full members of the Nurse Council. The sample comprised 214 nurses, who volunteered to participate in the study. The study data was collected using a web-based online survey (Demographic form, the Coronavirus Stress Measure, The Optimism and Pessimism Questionnaire, The Brief Adjustment Scale-6, The Death Distress Scale). RESULTS: the results indicated that perceived stress significantly and negatively predicted optimism (ß = -0.21, p < 0.001) and pessimism (ß = 0.38, p < 0.001). Perceived stress had significant and positive predictive effects on psychological adjustment (ß = 0.31, p < 0.001) and death distress (ß = 0.17, p < 0.01). Further analysis results revealed that pessimism mediates the association of stress with psychological adjustment and death distress; however, optimism only mediates the effect of stress on psychological adjustment among nurses. CONCLUSION: a low level of pessimism is effective in strengthening nurses' psychological adjustment skills againt perceived stress and death distress. Nurses should consider behavioral strategies to help reduce the level of pessimism during periods such as pandemics. BACKGROUND: (1) High levels of perceived stress increased higher score of psychological adjustment. (2) Pessimism mediates the association of stress with adjustment and death distress. (3) Optimism only mediates the effect of stress on psychological adjustment among nurses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Optimism , Pandemics , Pessimism , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Optimism/psychology , Female , Adult , Male , Pessimism/psychology , Middle Aged , Emotional Adjustment , Nurses/psychology , Cyprus , Attitude to Death , Adaptation, Psychological , Cohort Studies , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Psychological Distress , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
5.
Psychooncology ; 33(5): e6343, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697780

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: It is widely acknowledged that emotional states can influence skin conditions, yet limited research has delved into the impact of stress on skin cancer development. This retrospective study sought to expand the perspective on skin cancer risk factors by investigating the complex relationship between stressful life events and the incidence of skin cancer. METHODS: The sample included 268 individuals followed-up in a dermatological clinic, in three groups: Patients who had previously been diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma and are currently in remission (32%), those who had been diagnosed with non-melanoma skin cancer (30%), and a control group who are at risk for skin cancer (38%). Participants filled in questionnaires regarding childhood and adulthood life events, and loss and gain of resources following their subjectively most stressful event in adulthood. Multinomial logistic regression was used to examine the associations of life events with skin cancer occurrence, and mediating and moderating effects of resource loss/gain. RESULTS: Adverse childhood experiences were associated with melanoma occurrence, with the melanoma group reporting significantly more such experiences compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Resource loss from subjectively significant stressful life events in adulthood partially mediated the association between adverse childhood experiences and melanoma incidence. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that there may be intricate connections between stress, life events, adaptation to change, and skin cancer, which future research may further unravel. This study underscores the need for a more comprehensive approach to stress management, coping strategies development, and skin cancer prevention in healthcare settings.


Subject(s)
Life Change Events , Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Female , Male , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/psychology , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Melanoma/epidemiology , Melanoma/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Incidence , Risk Factors , Adaptation, Psychological , Adverse Childhood Experiences/statistics & numerical data
6.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302266, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701039

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Mothers faced an increased risk of adverse mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to other populations. However, there is little data on the factors that placed mothers at increased risk of distress. AIMS: The present study explored a range of individual, familial, and environmental factors associated with psychological distress in mothers during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: This repeated cross-sectional study was composed of a convenience sample of mothers who completed an online survey that included a demographic questionnaire, an emotion regulation questionnaire, and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress scale. The survey was administered during the second and third lockdowns in Israel in 2020-2021. RESULTS: The study included 575 mothers (M age = 39). The findings of a hierarchical regression indicated that individual-level factors, composed of age and emotion regulation tendencies predicted psychological distress. The family-level factors of household income and number of children in the family also predicted distress. In terms of environmental-level factors, COVID-19-related media consumption and school status (open or closed) were also significant predictors of psychological distress. Importantly, the results showed that the most important predictors of psychological distress in mothers during the COVID-19 outbreak were school closures, household income, and the use of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight the intersection of individual, familial, and environmental factors in mothers' mental health during crises.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mothers , Psychological Distress , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Female , Adult , Mothers/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Israel/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Mental Health , Pandemics , Emotional Regulation
7.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302020, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701106

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic changed the future of work sustainably and led to a general increase in mental stress. A study conducted during the second and third pandemic wave with a retrospective survey of the first wave among 1,545 non-healthcare workers confirmed an increase in anxiety and depression symptoms and showed a correlation with the occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk. This online follow-up survey aims to examine changes in mental distress as the pandemic progressed in Germany and to identify factors influencing potential changes. METHODS: Longitudinal data from 260 subjects were available for this analysis. Mental distress related to anxiety and depression symptoms, assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), and occupational risk factors were solicited at the end of 2022 and retrospectively at the fifth wave. Categorized PHQ-4 scores were modelled with mixed ordinal regression models and presented with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). RESULTS: A previous diagnosis of a depressive or anxiety disorder was a strong risk factor for severe symptoms (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.71-7.11). The impact of occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk on mental distress was increased, albeit failing to reach the formal level of statistical significance (high risk OR 1.83, 95% CI 0.59-5.63; probable risk OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.93-3.15). Mental distress was more pronounced in those with a previous diagnosis of anxiety and depression. Confirmed occupational risk factors were protective measures against occupational SARS-CoV-2 infection perceived as inadequate, chronic work-related stress, overcommitment, reduced interactions with fellow-workers, and work-privacy conflicts. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic had a negative impact on anxiety and depression symptoms among the studied non-healthcare workers, particularly early in the pandemic, although this effect does not appear to be permanent. There are modifiable risk factors that can protect workers' mental health, including strengthening social interactions among employees and reducing work-privacy conflicts.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , COVID-19 , Depression , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Germany/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Psychological Distress , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Longitudinal Studies
8.
Rev Colomb Psiquiatr (Engl Ed) ; 53(1): 47-54, 2024.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724170

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The prolongation and consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to an uncertain and devastating panorama in many populations, and the evidence shows a high prevalence of mental health problems in medical students. The objective was to evaluate the association between mood disorders and sleep quality (SQ) in Peruvian medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 310 medical students from a private university in Peru. The SQ was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), while mood disorders were evaluated using the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). All information was collected by online surveys and then analysed in the R programming language. RESULTS: The SQ results measured by PSQI were poor in 83.9% of the medical students. In the Poison regression analysis, the results of the bivariate analysis in men show that all mood disorders found the prevalence of poor SQ. However, in the multivariate analysis only stress (PRa=1.30; 95% CI, 1.08-1.57; P<0.01) and anxiety (PRa=1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.56; P <0.01) increased the prevalence of poor SQ. Women had a similar pattern in bivariate analysis, whereas in multivariate analysis, only severe stress (PRa=1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.29; P <0.05) increased the prevalence of poor SQ. CONCLUSIONS: This study allows us to observe the consequences that the COVID-19 pandemic is having on medical students in Peru. It also revealed a population group vulnerable to poor quality of sleep and bad mood, which in the future will impact on health. It is suggested to educate medical students about the importance of proper sleep hygiene and the consequences of poor sleep hygiene practices.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , COVID-19 , Mood Disorders , Sleep Quality , Students, Medical , Humans , Peru/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Students, Medical/psychology , Students, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Young Adult , Prevalence , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Adult , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Sex Factors , Adolescent
9.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10171, 2024 05 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702409

ABSTRACT

Mental health issues are intricately linked to socioeconomic background, employment and migration status. However, there remains a gap in understanding the mental health challenges faced by graduate youth in India, particularly in Kolkata City. This study aims to assess the prevalence and associated risk factors of depression, anxiety, and stress among higher-educated migrant youth. A survey was conducted on four hundred migrant graduate youths aged 21-35 residing in Kolkata. Measures included socio-demographics and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Chi-square tests and binary logistic regression were employed to identify factors associated with mental health issues. The overall prevalence rates were 54.4% for depression, 61.8% for anxiety, and 47.9% for stress. Unemployed youths exhibited significantly more symptoms of depression and anxiety than their employed counter parts. The logistic regression model showed that unemployed youth, female sex, never married, and second- and third-time migrant youths were risk factors for high scores on the DASS-21. This study showed that mental health issues were alarming in the higher educated migrant youth. The study suggests the implementation of skill-based, job-oriented, and professional courses at the graduation level to prevent graduates from being rendered unproductive and jobless. Beside these, regular psychological support should be provided to the higher educated youth by the local governments.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Depression , Transients and Migrants , Unemployment , Humans , Female , Male , India/epidemiology , Transients and Migrants/psychology , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Unemployment/psychology , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Young Adult , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Risk Factors , Prevalence , Mental Health , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Educational Status
10.
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao ; 44(4): 795-800, 2024 Apr 20.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708515

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of insomnia in college students and analyze the correlation between insomnia and perceived stress. METHODS: A cluster sampling method was used to investigate the prevalence of insomnia and stress levels in 3702 college students using Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10). RESULTS: Insomnia was detected in 31.4% of the college students, and the symptoms were more severe in male students (t=2.047, P=0.041) and in those with poorer family economic conditions (F=20.423, P<0.001). Insomnia was positively correlated with perceived stress, perceived distress, and perceived coping ability, with correlation coefficients of 0.42, 0.38, and 0.31, respectively (P<0.001). The students with higher levels of perceived stress had higher insomnia scores (F=203.03, P<0.001) and higher detection rate of insomnia (χ2=359.784, P<0.001), and those with moderate or severe insomnia also had higher levels of perceived stress (F=293.569, P<0.001). The types of perceived stress among college students included incontrollable (15.3%), nervous (8.3%), vulnerable (23.0%) and the relaxed types (53.5%). The incontrollable type was associated with the highest insomnia scores, followed by the nervous type and susceptible type, and the relaxed type had the lowest insomnia scores (F= 185.969, P<0.001). The prevalence rates of insomnia in students with the 4 types of perceived stress were 57.3%, 43.3%, 39.3%, and 18.7%, respectively (χ2=368.876, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a close correlation between perceived stress and insomnia, and identification of the high-risk population for insomnia from the perspectives of perceived stress level and perceived stress type can facilitate the management and prevention of insomnia.


Subject(s)
Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Stress, Psychological , Students , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/psychology , Students/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Male , Female , Universities , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Adaptation, Psychological , Perception
11.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(6): 329, 2024 May 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38709308

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychological distress is a prevalent unpleasant experience faced by many cancer patients. However, the psychological distress among gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients is scarcely explored. Moreover, the association between psychological distress and quality of life in different genders has yet to be explored. AIMS: To explore the psychological distress among GI cancer patients and examine its association with quality of life among different genders. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional study. A total of 237 gastrointestinal cancer patients completed the distress thermometer and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General. RESULTS: The mean score of psychological distress of the participants was 3.04 (SD = 2.90). A greater proportion of female gastrointestinal cancer patients (52.8%) had clinically relevant psychological distress compared to males (35.9%). The quality of life was negatively associated with their psychological distress (B = - 1.502, 95%CI: - 2.759 to - 0.245, p = 0.019) among gastrointestinal cancer patients. Such association was stronger among males compared to females in gastrointestinal cancer patients (Interaction term, B = - 1.713, 95%CI: - 3.123 to - 0.303, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that healthcare providers should attach their attention to gastrointestinal cancer patients' psychological distress, especially females. Longitudinal studies could adopted to track the changes in psychological distress and its association with quality of life over time among different genders. In future intervention studies, the focus of psychological interventions needs to be gender-specific.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Psychological Distress , Quality of Life , Humans , Male , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/psychology , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , Sex Factors , Aged , Adult , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
12.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0297169, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38713693

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study examined the potential influence of pre-pandemic psychological resilience on use of approach or avoidant coping styles and strategies to manage stress during the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized that higher resilience would be associated with more approach coping and less avoidant coping. DESIGN AND METHODS: Longitudinal cohort data were from the Nurses' Health Study II, including 13,143 female current and former healthcare professionals with pre-pandemic lifetime trauma. Pre-pandemic resilience was assessed between 2018-2019 and current coping during the outbreak of the pandemic in the United States (May-August 2020). Multiple linear regression model results identified associations between continuous pre-pandemic resilience scores and use of approach and avoidant coping styles, as well as individual coping strategies, adjusting for relevant covariates. RESULTS: Greater resilience was associated with higher use of approach coping (ß = 0.06, 95% CI 0.05, 0.08) and lower use of avoidant coping styles (ß = -0.39, 95% CI -0.41, -0.38). Higher pre-pandemic resilience was also associated with use of eight (distraction [ß = -0.18, 95% CI -0.20, -0.16], substance use [ß = -0.15, 95% CI -0.17, -0.13], behavioral disengagement [ß = -0.29, 95% CI -0.30, -0.27], self-blame [ß = -0.44, 95% CI -0.45, -0.42], emotional support (ß = 0.03, 95% CI 0.01, 0.05), positive reframing [ß = 0.13, 95% CI 0.12, 0.15], humor [ß = 0.03, 95% CI 0.01, 0.05] and religion [ß = 0.06, 95% CI 0.04, 0.08]) of the nine coping strategies in expected directions. CONCLUSION: Findings have important implications for intervention or even prevention efforts to support vulnerable groups, such as women with prior trauma histories, during this and other immensely stressful times. Supporting or building psychological resilience following trauma may promote effective coping in times of future stress.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , COVID-19 , Pandemics , Resilience, Psychological , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Longitudinal Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology
13.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 409, 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720258

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to (1) determine the reliability and validity of the interRAI Chinese Self-reported Carer Needs (SCaN) assessment among informal Chinese caregivers of older adults, (2) identify predictors of caregiving distress in Asian regions with long-standing Confucian values of filial piety and family responsibility. METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 531 informal Chinese caregivers of older adults in Hong Kong, Shanghai, Taiwan, and Singapore. The scale reliability was examined using Cronbach's alphas (α) and McDonald's omega coefficient (ω). The concurrent validity and discriminant validity were assessed using Spearman rank correlations (rho). To examine the predictors of caregiving distress among informal caregivers of older adults, we employed hierarchical linear regression analyses informed by the Model of Carer Stress and Burden and categorized the predictors into six domains. RESULTS: Results revealed good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.83-0.96) and concurrent validity (rho = 0.45-0.74) of the interRAI Chinese SCaN assessment. Hierarchical linear regression analysis revealed that entering the background factors, primary stressors, secondary stressors, appraisal, and exacerbating factors all significantly enhanced the model's predictability, indicating that the source of caregiving distress is multidimensional. In the full model, caregivers with longer informal care time, lack of support from family and friends, have unmet needs, experience role overload, have sleep problems, and low IADL functioning are at a higher risk of caregiving distress. CONCLUSIONS: The interRAI Chinese SCaN Assessment was found to be a reliable and valid tool among the Chinese informal caregivers of older adults. It would be useful for determining family caregivers' strengths, needs, and challenges, and tailoring interventions that address the potentially modifiable factors associated with caregiving distress and maximize support. Healthcare providers working in home and community settings should be aware of the early identification of caregiving distress and routine assessment of their needs and empower them to continue taking care of their needs and providing adequate care to the care recipient.


Subject(s)
Caregivers , Needs Assessment , Self Report , Humans , Caregivers/psychology , Male , Female , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Middle Aged , China/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Reproducibility of Results , Aged, 80 and over , Adult , Taiwan/epidemiology , East Asian People
14.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 594, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714981

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Student midwives deliver care for women under challenging job demands, which may affect their mental health- thus creating a high need for health promotion. Given the lack of research addressing this topic, the aim of this study is to examine the links between stress perception, coping behaviors, work-privacy conflict, and perception of COVID-19 pandemic impact on studies of student midwives in northern Germany. METHODS: Data were collected using a cross-sectional online-survey at nine midwifery study sites in northern Germany from October 2022 to January 2023. 342 student midwives (response rate: 61.3%) were surveyed on stress perception, coping behaviors, work-privacy conflict, and perceived impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their studies. Descriptive, linear regression and moderation analyses were run to test explorative assumptions. RESULTS: Results revealed that higher levels of perceived stress were reported by 13.4% of student midwives. Social support (M = 13.76, SD = 2.19) and active stress coping (M = 10.72, SD = 2.01) were identified as most prevalent coping behaviors in the present sample. It was found that work-privacy conflict was positively associated with stress perception (ß = 0.53, p =.001) and maladaptive coping behaviors (alcohol and cigarette consumption: ß = 0.14, p =.015), and negatively associated with adaptive coping behaviors (positive thinking: ß = - 0.25, p =.001, social support: ß = - 0.23, p =.001). Students with children reported significantly lower levels of social support than students without children. 55.6% of student midwives perceived a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their studies (mostly on lectures, seminars, and contact with fellow students). CONCLUSIONS: Key findings highlighted moderate stress levels among student midwives during theoretical study stage. Based on current research, prevalence of high stress levels among student midwives remains unclear. Given the overall heterogeneous, limited research on student midwives' stress perception, coping behaviors, work-privacy conflict and perceptions of COVID-19 pandemic impact on studies, implications for research are suggested, e.g. longitudinal studies at different time points and settings and interventional studies. Findings provide a starting point for implementation of workplace health promotion in theoretical and practical stages of midwifery science study programs, e.g. training courses on stress prevention and adaptive coping, and for improvement of working conditions.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , COVID-19 , Midwifery , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Germany/epidemiology , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Students, Nursing/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Male , Coping Skills
15.
J Affect Disord ; 358: 1-11, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38705521

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Childhood trauma experience is closely associated with depression, anxiety, stress, and problematic smartphone use (PSU). However, few studies have explored the complex symptom-level relations between these variables among people with and without trauma experiences, leaving a gap in treating and alleviating these mental disorders among individuals with childhood trauma. METHODS: The current study used a convenience sampling method and recruited 2708 participants who completed Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF), Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS-21), and Mobile Phone Addiction Tendency Scale (MPATS), dividing them into trauma (n = 1454, Mean age = 19.67) and no-trauma (n = 1254, Mean age = 19.57) groups according to the cut-off scores of CTQ-SF. Symptom network analysis and network comparison test were conducted to construct and compare the network models between trauma and no-trauma groups. RESULTS: The findings indicate that the trauma group and females exhibit greater average levels of DASS-21 and PSU symptoms compared to the no-trauma group and males, respectively. Additionally, the edge between "Stress" and "Anxiety" is the strongest across trauma and no-trauma groups. "Social comfort" is a bridge symptom of the trauma group network and the results of bridge symptoms in the no-trauma group are not stable. LIMITATIONS: This study did not categorize all individuals according to specific types of trauma experiences and it is a cross-sectional design. The prevalences calculated in this study may not be generalizable. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions targeting different bridge symptoms in the trauma and no-trauma network models may help reduce the severity of symptoms.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Depression , Smartphone , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Female , Male , Young Adult , Adult , Anxiety/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Adverse Childhood Experiences/statistics & numerical data , Internet Addiction Disorder/epidemiology , Internet Addiction Disorder/psychology , Adolescent , Surveys and Questionnaires , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
16.
Narra J ; 4(1): e212, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38798845

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a negative impact on the mental health of health workers worldwide. Many studies examined the mental health of the frontline health workers in hospitals, but similar research on health workers at the port entries has yet to be found. The aim of this study was to determine the mental health issue and its associated factors and to determine the psychological resilience factors of port health workers in Sabang, Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. A retrospective mixed-method study was conducted among 38 port health officers. Total sampling included those working from January 2020 to March 2023. The information on age, gender, qualification, working time and working place of the respondents were collected and the mental health was assessed using the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). The correlation and association between the socio-demographic data and mental health were tested with Spearman and chi-squared tests, respectively. The qualitative study on psychological resilience factors were performed with interviews and analyzed with NVivo. This study indicated that 47.4% of port health officers experienced depression, 63.1% anxiety and 50.0% stress. Age and working time significantly affected the mental health. Age correlated positively and significantly with anxiety (p<0.0001) and stress (p<0.0001), while working time significantly affected the anxiety (p=0.003). The psychological resilience factors identified were spirituality, positive emotions, official support, and personal well-being that helped the workers taking away learn lessons. In conclusion, mental health issues are high among frontline workers during the pandemic highlighting the importance of the prevention measures to ensure the work performance among employees.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Health Personnel , Mental Health , Resilience, Psychological , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Indonesia/epidemiology , Male , Female , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Health Personnel/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Pandemics , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2
17.
Inquiry ; 61: 469580241248124, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38712804

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has presented a globally challenging situation for human physical and mental health. Healthcare workers (HCWs) are affected by increased levels of anxiety, stress, and insomnia. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 on HCWs anxiety, stress, and insomnia levels. This cross-sectional study employed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Perceived Stress Scale 10, and Insomnia Severity Index to assess anxiety, stress, and insomnia among HCWs at 10 COVID-19 isolation and treatment hospitals/centers after the first COVID-19 wave in Jordan. A web-based survey was used to collect data from 183 participants. Statistical analysis of factors affecting the mean scores of anxiety, stress, and insomnia was carried using student t-test or ANOVA while factors associated with differences in anxiety, stress, and insomnia frequencies were tested using Chi-square/Fisher exact test. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent risk factors. Among participants, 97.3% reported moderate to severe levels of stress, 68% reported borderline to high abnormal levels of anxiety, and 32% had moderate to severe insomnia. The mean of anxiety total score was 9.8 ± 4.8, stress total score was 22.7 ± 4.5, and insomnia total score was 11.0 ± 7.1. Significant positive correlations were noted between anxiety, stress, and insomnia (P < .005). Female gender, migraine, less working years, increased time spent with patients, lower workforce, clinical insomnia and high stress were significant independent factors associated with anxiety (P < .05). Younger age, being single or divorced, heart disease, smoking, occupation (nurses), lower workforce, vaccination dose, and anxiety were significant independent factors associated with insomnia (P < .05). Increased time spent with patients, lower workforce, lower spouse and colleagues support, sadness due to isolation and anxiety were significant independent factors associated with stress. HCWs at COVID-19 centers had high levels of stress, anxiety, and insomnia. Appropriate interventions to maintain HCWs mental health are recommended.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , COVID-19 , Mental Health , SARS-CoV-2 , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Female , Adult , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Jordan/epidemiology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Depression/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Risk Factors , Health Personnel/psychology
18.
J Pak Med Assoc ; 74(4): 666-671, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751259

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To identify sexual dysfunction in married women of reproductive age, and to examine its relationship with stress coping styles. METHODS: The cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted between February and June 2019 at the obstetrics and gynaecology outpatient clinic of Gulhane Training and Research Hospital in Ankara, Turkiye. The sample comprised married women aged 18-49 years who had an active sexual life over the preceding month, and were neither pregnant nor in the postpartum phase. Data was collected using the Female Sexual Function Index, and the Stress Coping Styles Scale. Data was analysed using SPSS 22. RESULTS: There were 216 women with mean age 33.58±6.77 years. The mean Female Sexual Function Index score was 22.29±6.08. The mean Stress Coping Styles Scale subscale scores were: self-confident 20.71±3.53, helpless 18.07±4.27, submissive 12.13±3.00, optimistic 13.70±2.35, and seeking social support 11.89±2.01. The total Female Sexual Function Index score had a positive, significant correlation with self-confidence (r=0.15; p=0.03) and seeking social support subscales (r=0.18; p=0.01) and a negative, significant correlation with submissive subscale (r=-0.17; p=0.02) of the Stress Coping Styles Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Establishing awareness among women about sexual dysfunction and improving effective coping styles may contribute to improved sexual health among women.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Female , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Young Adult , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/psychology , Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological/epidemiology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/psychology , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Turkey/epidemiology , Adolescent , Marriage/psychology , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10688, 2024 05 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724683

ABSTRACT

Diabetes-related distress (DRD) refers to the psychological distress specific to living with diabetes. DRD can lead to negative clinical consequences such as poor self-management. By knowing the local prevalence and severity of DRD, primary care teams can improve the DRD evaluation in our daily practice. This was a cross-sectional study conducted in 3 General Out-patient Clinics (GOPCs) from 1 December 2021 to 31 May 2022. A random sample of adult Chinese subjects with T2DM, who regularly followed up in the selected clinic in the past 12 months, were included. DRD was measured by the validated 15-item Chinese version of the Diabetes Distress Scale (CDDS-15). An overall mean score ≥ 2.0 was considered clinically significant. The association of DRD with selected clinical and personal factors was investigated. The study recruited 362 subjects (mean age 64.2 years old, S.D. 9.5) with a variable duration of living with T2DM (median duration 7.0 years, IQR 10.0). The response rate was 90.6%. The median HbA1c was 6.9% (IQR 0.9). More than half (59.4%) of the subjects reported a clinically significant DRD. Younger subjects were more likely to have DRD (odds ratio of 0.965, 95% CI 0.937-0.994, p = 0.017). Patients with T2DM in GOPCs commonly experience clinically significant DRD, particularly in the younger age group. The primary care clinicians could consider integrating the evaluation of DRD as a part of comprehensive diabetes care.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Primary Health Care , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/psychology , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Psychological Distress , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...