TRAPEZE: a randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy with zoledronic acid, strontium-89, or both, in men with bony metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Bony metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer is associated with a poor prognosis and high morbidity. TRAPEZE was a two-by-two factorial randomised controlled trial of zoledronic acid (ZA) and strontium-89 (Sr-89), each combined with docetaxel. All have palliative benefits, are used to control bone symptoms and are used with docetaxel to prolong survival. ZA, approved on the basis of reducing skeletal-related events (SREs), is commonly combined with docetaxel in practice, although evidence of efficacy and cost-effectiveness is lacking. Sr-89, approved for controlling metastatic pain and reducing need for subsequent bone treatments, is generally palliatively used in patients unfit for chemotherapy. Phase II analysis confirmed the safety and feasibility of combining these agents. TRAPEZE aimed to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of each agent. METHODS: Patients were randomised to receive six cycles of docetaxel plus prednisolone: alone, with ZA, with a single Sr-89 dose after cycle 6, or with both. Primary outcomes were clinical progression-free survival (CPFS: time to pain progression, SRE or death) and cost-effectiveness. Secondary outcomes were SRE-free interval (SREFI), total SREs, overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL). Log-rank test and Cox regression modelling were used to determine clinical effectiveness. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from the NHS perspective and expressed as cost per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). An additional analysis was carried out for ZA to reflect the availability of generic ZA. PATIENTS: 757 randomised (median age 68.7 years; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale score 0, 40%; 1, 52%; 2, 8%; prior radiotherapy, 45%); median prostate-specific antigen 143.78 ng/ml (interquartile range 50.8-353.9 ng/ml). Stratified log-rank analysis of CPFS was statistically non-significant for either agent (Sr-89, p = 0.11; ZA, p = 0.45). Cox regression analysis adjusted for stratification variables showed CPFS benefit for Sr-89 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.845, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.99; p = 0.036] and confirmed no effect of ZA (p = 0.46). ZA showed a significant SREFI effect (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.63 to 0.93; p = 0.008). Neither agent affected OS (Sr-89, p = 0.74; ZA, p = 0.91), but both increased total cost (vs. no ZA and no Sr-89, respectively); decreased post-trial therapies partly offset costs [net difference: Sr-89 £1341; proprietary ZA (Zometa(®), East Hanover, NJ, USA) £1319; generic ZA £251]. QoL was maintained in all trial arms; Sr-89 (0.08 additional QALYs) and ZA (0.03 additional QALYs) showed slight improvements. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for Sr-89 was £16,590, with £42,047 per QALY for Zometa and £8005 per QALY for generic ZA. CONCLUSION: Strontium-89 improved CPFS, but not OS. ZA did not improve CPFS or OS but significantly improved SREFI, mostly post progression, suggesting a role as post-chemotherapy maintenance therapy. QoL was well maintained in all treatment arms, with differing patterns of care resulting from the effects of Sr-89 on time to progression and ZA on SREFI and total SREs. The addition of Sr-89 resulted in additional cost and a small positive increase in QALYs, with an ICER below the £20,000 ceiling per QALY. The additional costs and small positive QALY changes in favour of ZA resulted in ICERs of £42,047 (Zometa) and £8005 for the generic alternative; thus, generic ZA represents a cost-effective option. Additional analyses on the basis of data from the Hospital Episode Statistics data set would allow corroborating the findings of this study. Further research into the use of ZA (and other bone-targeting therapies) with newer prostate cancer therapies would be desirable. STUDY REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12808747. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 53. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

[The non-hormonal treatment of metastatic prostate cancer]. / Le traitement non hormonal de la maladie métastatique du cancer de la prostate.

AIM: To describe drugs used in the non-hormonal treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. MATERIAL: Bibliographical search was performed from the database Medline (National Library of Medicine, PubMed) and websites of the HAS and the ANSM. The search was focused on the characteristics, the mode of action, the efficiency and the side effects of the various drugs concerned. RESULTS: The metabolic radiotherapy although under-used for this indication, kept a place at the beginning of the disease. Radium-223 chloride seems to have to occupy an important place in the coming years. The chemotherapy, the only recourse until very recently in the castration-resistant prostate cancer, must redefine its place partially. The denosumab provide an interesting alternative to bisphosphonates. CONCLUSION: The non-hormonal treatment of the metastatic disease of the prostate cancer is changing rapidly with the emergence of new molecules. Urologist must know perfectly these new drugs.

Painful bone metastases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer: economic costs of strontium-89 and/or external radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: In a prospective randomized Canadian trial, addition of radionuclide strontium (89Sr) to external radiotherapy (ER) was found to prolong the time to further ER by 15 weeks (35 versus 20, P = 0.006) compared to ER alone in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer (HRMPC). The total direct lifetime costs within the Swedish health care system for the following two treatment strategies was estimated as follows: (a) ER initially and in the event of relapse and (b) ER + 89Sr initially and ER in the event of relapse. METHODS: Calculation of lifetime costs was based on the initial total treatment cost and the probability of future treatment costs. In a retrospective analysis, the average cost of a relapse treated with ER alone was calculated from the actual care consumption of 79 consecutive patients from the south of Sweden who received ER because of skeletal pain due to HRMPC. The costs related to ER included skeletal scintigraphy, ER, outpatient visits, inpatients days, and travel to the treatment center. When 89Sr was added, the cost also included the radionuclide and its administration. Costs in Swedish currency (SEK) were based on the regional tariff for 1993 (U.S. $1 = SEK 8.30). RESULTS: The initial cost for one relapse treated with ER alone was estimated to be SEK 31,011 (U.S. $3736) per patient resident within county (close to hospital) and SEK 48,585 (U.S. $5854) per patient resident out of county (far from hospital). The corresponding figure for initial addition of 89Sr to ER was SEK 43,426 (U.S. $5232) and 61,000 (U.S. $7349), respectively. However, comparison between estimated lifetime cost for the two treatment strategies indicated potential cost savings with initial addition of 89Sr to 3% SEK 2720 (U.S. $328) and 7% SEK 11,290 (U.S. $1360), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Strontium-89 as initial supplement to ER for palliation of pain in HRMPC is beneficial both from the patient and lifetime health service costs perspectives.

Strontium-89 for symptomatic metastatic prostate cancer to bone: recommendations for hospice patients.

In our institution, 4 mCi doses of the radiopharmaceutical strontium-89 (Sr89) have been given to 101 prostate cancer patients suffering from symptomatic bone metastases. Patients were prospectively analyzed for pain response, treatment-related hematologic toxicity, and survival. Pre-treatment clinical factors were correlated with outcome. Karnofsky Performance Scores (KPS) predicted for survival and pain response. Myelosuppression from the Sr89 treatment was minimal. Twenty-eight of the treated patients had a KPS of 60 or less. This group of patients had a median actuarial survival of 17.5 weeks, and collectively, met Hospice admission survival criteria. In a subset analysis of this group, patients with a KPS of 50 or less demonstrated a low pain response (40%) and average survival (12.5 weeks), both of which did not appear to justify the significant cost and risk of toxicity associated with Sr89 treatment. In these patients, opioids appeared to offer more cost-effective pain control. Patients with a pre-treatment KPS score of 60 had a mean survival of 20.5 weeks following Sr89 therapy, with 42 percent of patients experiencing a reduction in pain. We conclude that patients with a pretreatment KPS of 50 or less should not be treated with Sr89 and patients with a pretreatment KPS of 60 should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine whether or not Sr89 represents the most reasonable treatment option for palliation of their bone pain.

Strontium 89 therapy for the palliation of pain due to osseous metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To present the current state of systemic radiopharmaceutical therapy for the palliation of pain in individuals with metastatic cancer and to evaluate the palliative effect and degree of hemotoxicity of strontium chloride 89 (89Sr) in patients with painful osteoblastic metastases primarily from prostate and breast cancer. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: A MEDLINE search through December 1994 was performed to identify English-language studies that met the following criteria. All eligible studies reported treatment of patients with painful osteoblastic bony metastases primarily from prostate or breast cancer treated with intravenous 89Sr. For study eligibility, evaluation of clinical response as assessed by the Karnofsky index, need for pain medication, or changes in mobility or sleep patterns was required. Hemotoxicity data were a requirement. A minimum of 10 prostate cancer cases was necessary for study inclusion. Only those studies assessing clinical response following one injection of 89Sr were included. Preliminary reports of cooperative studies were not included. Doses of 89Sr ranged from 0.6 MBq/kg (16 microCi/kg) to 400 MBq (10.8 mCi) per patient. Evaluation of patients for at least 3 months following 89Sr treatment was required. In addition, two studies examining issues of cost with regard to 89Sr treatment were identified. DATA EXTRACTION: Baseline pain assessment and periodic pain estimates as measured by the Karnofsky index, medication diaries, changes in mobility, sleep patterns, and/or ability to work were the basis for assessment of response. Baseline and periodic complete blood cell counts were the basis for hemotoxicity evaluation. DATA SYNTHESIS: Palliation and hemotoxicity data were analyzed separately for each study. Some improvement occurred in as many as approximately 80% of patients. Several studies demonstrated complete relief of pain in at least 10% of patients The nadir of platelet and white blood cell counts appears at approximately 4 to 8 weeks following injection, with a partial return to baseline by 12 weeks. As many as 10 injections spaced 3 months apart have been given to some patients with repeated palliative effect and without serious hemotoxicity. Reinjection may be limited by a platelet count below 60 x 10(9)/L, a white blood cell count below 2.4 x 10(9)/L, or the absence of osteoblastic skeletal metastasis as seen on bone scan. Studies examining treatment costs suggest that 89Sr may decrease costs associated with palliation of pain due to metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: As many as 80% of selected patients with painful osteoblastic bony metastases from prostate or breast cancer may experience some pain relief following 89Sr administration. In addition, as many as 10% or more may become pain free. Duration of clinical response may average 3 to 6 months in some cases. Hemotoxicity is mild. A decrease in treatment costs with administration of 89Sr to patients with painful osteoblastic bony metastases from prostate cancer may occur. These observations reflect the preliminary nature of knowledge in this field and point to the need for larger clinical trials of the use of 89Sr palliation.