The Cost of Medications at a Student-Run Free Clinic in New Haven, Connecticut, 2021-2023.

Introduction: Haven is a student-run free clinic in New Haven, Connecticut, that serves more than 500 patients annually. Haven's pharmacy department helps patients obtain medications by providing discount coupons or medications from the clinic's in-house pharmacy, directly paying for medications at local pharmacies, and delivering medications to patients' homes. This study aimed to identify prescriptions that have the highest cost among Haven patients. Methods: Our sample consisted of all Haven patients who attended the clinic from March 2021 through March 2023. Patients were eligible to be seen at Haven if they were aged 18 to 65 years, lacked health insurance, and lived in New Haven. We determined the lowest cost of each medication prescribed to Haven patients by comparing prices among local pharmacies after applying a GoodRx discount. We defined expensive medication as more than $20 per prescription. We excluded medical supplies. Results: Of the 594 Haven patients in our sample, 64% (n = 378) required financial assistance and 22% (n = 129) were prescribed at least 1 expensive medication. Among 129 patients prescribed an expensive medication, the mean (SD) age was 45.0 (12.3) years; 65% were women, and 87% were Hispanic or Latino. Median (IQR) household annual income was $14,400 [$0-$24,000]. We identified 246 expensive medications; the median (IQR) price per prescription was $31.43 ($24.00-$52.02). The most frequently prescribed expensive medications were fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (accounting for 6% of all expensive medications), medroxyprogesterone acetate (6%), albuterol sulfate (5%), and rosuvastatin (5%). Conclusion: The average Haven patient has an income well below the federal poverty level, and many have chronic cardiovascular and respiratory conditions that require expensive medications. Future research should work toward making medications universally affordable.

Student-run free clinics may enhance medical students' self-confidence in their clinical skills and preparedness for clerkships.

INTRODUCTION: Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) offer medical students a unique opportunity to develop their clinical, diagnostic, and social skills while providing care to medically underserved communities. This study aims to evaluate the value of SRFC involvement on students' self-reported confidence in various clinical domains and satisfaction with their medical education. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective pre-post assessment at an urban academic institution among second- to fourth-year medical students. We administered a 25-item questionnaire capturing the scope of clinic involvement and assessing self-reported confidence in multiple clinical domains following a one-year-long participation in student-run free clinics. RESULTS: Fifty-six students completed the survey. Participation in SRFCs significantly increased self-reported confidence in patient history-taking (p < 0.001), performing oral presentations (p < 0.001) and physical exams (p < 0.001). Students also reported significantly greater confidence in working with translators (p < 0.001) or as part of an interprofessional team (p < 0.001) and understanding the needs of the population served (p < 0.001). Students also found SRCs to significantly improve their confidence in preparedness for clerkships (p < 0.001). SRFC involvement can improve medical students' confidence in their clinical and interpersonal skills and enhance preparedness for clerkships and working with diverse patient groups. CONCLUSION: SRFCs are a useful tool in the medical school curriculum that help bridge the gap between classroom learning and clinic and may encourage practice in medically underserved communities. SRFCs also integrate classroom material and clinical practice, although standardized evaluation metrics need to be developed. SRFCs should be incorporated as a learning experience by medical schools nationwide.

The impact and user experience of a student-led clinic providing preventative services.

OBJECTIVES: Preventative services are required to address the risk factors for chronic conditions such as cardiovascular disease. The National Health Service Health Checks in England were introduced to provide such services. One School of Pharmacy established a student-led clinic to provide this service to the local community. The clinic was provided by undergraduate pharmacy students and delivered free of charge within a central city locality. The aim was to explore the impact of the clinic on user thoughts and motivations around healthy living and investigate user experience. METHODS: A sequential explanatory mixed methods approach was used consisting of a survey that measured users' thoughts about their health and well-being and experience of the clinic. Qualitative interviews explored the user experience and barriers and facilitators to making healthier lifestyle choices. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-four members of the public accessed the clinic over the evaluative period. Ninety-six (60%) completed the pre-post survey and 12 participated in follow-up interviews. Users reported statistically significant improvements in how informed, competent and motivated they felt towards making healthier lifestyle choices after the clinic consultation. Interview findings highlighted the positive user experience, reported appreciation for clinic accessibility, availability of healthy lifestyle education, and a desire for more preventative services being as readily available. CONCLUSIONS: The student-led clinic has demonstrated positive impacts on user experience, knowledge, competence, and motivation to make healthier lifestyle choices. The clinic provides proof-of-concept for pharmacy students to deliver preventative community services that aim to improve population health at a time when primary care is experiencing unprecedented challenges.

Evaluation of patient health outcomes of a student-run free clinic in East Harlem.

BACKGROUND: Most United States medical schools have affiliated student-run free clinics, but the quality of services provided in such contexts compared to national metrics is unknown. This study determines whether a student-run, attending-supervised free clinic servicing a low-income and minority race patient population in New York City can meet national metrics of care. METHODS: Through chart review from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020, patient outcomes and service utilization in the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set were examined and compared to national rates of patients using Medicaid HMO or Medicare. Patients are ≥ 21 years of age, residents of East Harlem, and ineligible for health insurance because of legal residency requirements. The majority identify as Hispanic and speak Spanish as their primary language. All patients who were seen in the clinic during the 2020 calendar year were included. The primary study outcome is the number of Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures in which patients, seen in a student-run free clinic, meet or exceed national comparisons. RESULTS: The healthcare outcomes of 238 patients, mean age 47.8 years and 54.6% female, were examined in 18 Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures. The student-run free clinic met or exceeded national metrics in 16 out of 18 categories. CONCLUSIONS: The student-run free clinic met or exceeded the national standard of care according to national metrics. Evidence-based priorities have been clarified for future improvement. Other student-run free clinics should similarly evaluate the quality of their services.

The Chicagoland Free Clinics Consortium: A Model for Student-Run Free Clinic Collaboration.

BACKGROUND: While student-run free clinics (SRFCs) play an important role in care for underserved populations, few mechanisms exist to promote collaboration among regional SRFCs. AIMS: To address this gap, the Chicagoland Free Clinics Consortium (CFCC) was formed to (1) facilitate collaboration between Chicagoland SRFCs, (2) provide innovation grant funding, and (3) host an annual conference. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In 2018, students from the Pritzker School of Medicine founded the CFCC and partnered with peers from area schools to implement programming. PROGRAM DESCRIPTION: Between 2018 and 2022, CFCC engaged 23 SRFCs representing all 6 Chicagoland schools, held 4 annual conferences, and distributed $15,423 in grants to 19 projects at 14 SRFC sites. PROGRAM EVALUATION: A total of 176 students from 5 schools attended the 4 conferences. In 2022, 82 unique participants were surveyed, and 66% (54/82) responded. Eighty percent (43/54) reported they were "more likely to collaborate with other Chicagoland free clinics." In 2022, all grant sites were surveyed and 84% (16/19) responded. Most (87%,14/16) agreed the grant "allowed them to implement a project that would not have otherwise been accomplished" and 21% (4/19) were inter-institutional collaborations. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, CFCC is the first student-led organization to promote sustained collaboration across SRFCs in a metropolitan area.

Quantifying the Educational Value of a Student-Run Free Clinic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) are settings in which students in health professions gain clinical experience, often while providing free or reduced-cost health care to the surrounding community. The current literature quantifies the many benefits these clinics provide to their patients and the impact they have on students' future careers; but few previous studies have assessed the financial impact of the education provided at an SRFC. We report on a net educational benefit, an educational benefit to educational cost ratio, and a net educational benefit to educational cost ratio of one SRFC from the perspective of the university. METHODS: We calculated the value of education by multiplying all student hours worked in the clinic by the associated value of 1 hour in the typical tuition-based curriculum. Clinic educational costs and student hours were obtained from clinic records from August 1, 2021 through July 31, 2022. RESULTS: We found the total educational value students received to be $73,571 over one academic year. The educational operating expenses of the clinic totaled $9,053, resulting in a benefit-cost ratio of 8.13. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated a potential financial advantage of operating an SRFC when assessing clinic education expenses in relation to the value of university-generated education. Our research may serve as a starting point to showcase the economic benefit of SRFCs to their parent institutions and encourage further analysis of other benefits SRFCs may provide to institutions of higher education.

Patient-Level Characteristics Associated with Tobacco Users and Nonusers at a Student-Run Free Clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Many tobacco users are motivated to quit but lack the resources to do so. To date, studies characterizing tobacco users at student-run free clinics have used small sample sizes, which may not be large enough to detect differences across key variables. As such, we assessed sociodemographic differences between tobacco users and nonusers at a student-run free clinic using a pooled cross-sectional design. METHODS: We used patient-level data from the electronic health records for all of the patients who were seen during January 2012 to February 2020 inclusive. Our dependent variable was whether patients self-reported tobacco use. We assessed for differences across age, sex, race/ethnicity, and education level using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Across 4264 patients, 28.7% reported tobacco use. When controlling for other factors, greater odds of tobacco use were observed in this cohort for patients who were male (odds ratio [OR] 1.690, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.468-1.944), those with educational attainment of 9th to 11th grade (OR 2.291, 95% CI 1.558-3.369), and those who were high school graduates/completed the General Education Development test (OR 1.849, 95% CI 1.295-2.638) compared with those with less than a high school education. Similarly, patients of older age had greater odds of tobacco use. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found patient-level differences that may need to be integrated into improving the reach of intervention methods. Future research should look at a broader set of metrics (eg, geographic location, socioeconomic status) and ascertain reasons for sociodemographic differences observed.

The Costs of Operating a Student-run Free Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Free clinics provide care for those who may otherwise not have access. While this care is often free for patients, it is not free to operate such clinics. This review will provide a budget and breakdown of all expenditures at a student-run free clinic along with average costs of services provided to patients. METHODS: Accounting data was used to categorize all expenses and generate an annual budget. An inventory tracking system was developed to measure the costs of all medical supplies and services accurately, providing information on costs per clinic and costs per patient for each provided service. RESULTS: The average cost per clinic was $53.55 (per patient: $2.14) for general clinic supplies, $43.74 (per patient: $7.29) for telehealth, $278.47 (per patient: $12.66) for laboratory services, $247.25 (per patient: $10.75) for pharmacy services, and $8.30 (per patient: $1.19) for social work. These costs contributed to a relative minority (< 33%) of the total costs to run a free clinic, where the highest costs were for volunteer appreciation and administrative overhead. Twelve categories of expenditures (administrative overhead, volunteer appreciation, medical and lab supplies, conferences and special projects, advertising and marketing, telehealth, pharmacy, specialty clinics, chronic care, patient transportation, social work, and accounting services) were ranked in order of necessity, and methods for cost reduction were discussed for each category. CONCLUSIONS: Categorizing costs can show where cost savings and cost-effective additions may be implemented. This study may serve as a financial and budgeting reference for other clinics.

Controlling Pharmaceutical Costs in a Student-Run Free Clinic in a Resource-Limited Patient Setting.

Our institution's student-run free clinic has been able to offer medication at no out-of-pocket cost to all patients since it opened in 2004. We have employed two strategies to manage prescription drug costs while simultaneously increasing medication coverage: (1) using Patient Drug Assistance Programs (PDAPs) and (2) developing an institutional-level partnership with pharmaceutical charities for medication subsidization. In this study, we aimed to analyze the financial impact of these measures on the clinic.A query of clinic data over the past 5 years identified 299 active PDAPs, corresponding to 299 fully-subsidized prescriptions. In 2017, there were 35 active PDAPs, increasing to 52 (2018), 62 (2019), and 82 (2020) before a decline to 68 PDAPs in 2021. The company affiliated with the most PDAPs varied annually: GlaxoSmithKline (2017), Lilly (2018, 2019, 2020), and both GlaxoSmithKline and Lilly (2021). The most frequent medications were sitagliptin (2017), insulin (2018, 2019), albuterol (2017, 2018), and dulaglutide (2020, 2021).In addition, data extracted from the private company subsidization program was analyzed for the year 2021. Program membership was $10,000 for institution-wide medication subsidization for all uninsured patients in the hospital system. In total, the clinic was able to acquire 220 medications with a 96% subsidy, corresponding to a direct clinic cost of $2,101.28. Comparatively, the market value of these medications was $52,401.51.Utilization of free drug acquisition programs and partnerships with pharmaceutical charities allowed for an increase in cost-savings and medications provided. Although the process for applying for medication assistance programs is complex, these programs serve as powerful tools for providing medications that may otherwise be unavailable due to cost. Other clinics and healthcare settings with uninsured patients should consider these programs as a means to ease medication cost burden.

Expanding Access to Psychiatric Care Through Universal Depression Screening: Lessons from an Urban Student-Run Free Clinic.

The purpose of this study is to report the utility of a universal depression screening in a student-run free clinic (SRFC) to improve bridging to psychiatric care. Patients (n = 224) seen by an SRFC between April 2017 and November 2022 were screened for depression in the patient's primary language using the standardized Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). A PHQ-9 score greater or equal to 5 prompted psychiatry referral. Retrospective chart review was conducted to determine clinical characteristics and length of psychiatry follow-up. Out of 224 patients screened, 77 patients had positive depression screens and were referred to the SRFC's adjacent psychiatry clinic. Of these 77 patients, 56 patients (73%) were female, the average age was 43.7 (SD = 14.5), and the mean PHQ score was 10 (SD = 5.13). Thirty-seven patients (48%) accepted referral, while 40 (52%) declined or were lost to follow-up. There were no statistical differences in age or number of medical comorbidities between the two groups. Patients who accepted referrals were more likely to be female, as well as to have psychiatric histories, higher PHQ-9 scores, and a history of trauma. Reasons for declining and being lost to follow-up included transition to insurance, geographic relocation and deferral due to hesitancy in seeking psychiatric care. Implementation of a standardized depression screening reveals a significant rate of depressive symptoms among an urban uninsured primary care population. Universal screening may serve as a tool to improve the delivery of psychiatric care to underserved patients.

Results of Leveraging Pharmaceutical Patient Assistance Programs to Expand Access to High Cost Medications in a Student-Run Free Clinic.

High costs make many medications inaccessible to patients in the United States. Uninsured and underinsured patients are disproportionately affected. Pharmaceutical companies offer patient assistance programs (PAPs) to lower the cost-sharing burden of expensive prescription medications for uninsured patients. PAPs are used by various clinics, particularly oncology clinics and those caring for underserved communities, to expand patients' access to medications. Prior studies describing the implementation of PAPs in student-run free clinics have demonstrated cost-savings during the first few years of using PAPs. However, there is a lack of data regarding the efficacy and cost savings of longitudinal use of PAPs across several years. This study describes the growth of PAP use at a student-run free clinic in Nashville, Tennessee over ten years, demonstrating that PAPs can be used reliably and sustainably to expand patients' access to expensive medications. From 2012 to 2021, we increased the number of medications available through PAPs from 8 to 59 and the number of patient enrollments from 20 to 232. In 2021, our PAP enrollments demonstrated potential cost savings of over $1.2 million. Strategies, limitations, and future directions of PAP use are also discussed, highlighting that PAPs can be a powerful tool for free clinics in serving underserved communities.

"Many people know nothing about us": narrative medicine applications at a student-run free clinic.

Narrative medicine is an approach to healthcare that acknowledges the stories of patients' lives both within and beyond the clinical setting. Narrative medicine has been increasingly recognized as a promising tool to support modern educational needs in health professions training, such as interprofessional practice, while enhancing quality of care. Here, we describe the development, implementation, and application of a narrative medicine program at the University of Minnesota Phillips Neighborhood Clinic. First, in a qualitative analysis of patient stories (n = 12) we identified themes regarding the value of the storytelling experience; patients' personal journeys; and patients' experiences in healthcare and other systems. Second, an interprofessional educational activity for student volunteers (n = 57) leveraging a patient narrative was observed to be satisfactory, significantly improve attitudes toward the underserved, and enhance quality of care from the perspectives of trainees. Together, findings from the two studies imply the potential benefits of broader incorporation of narrative medicine into interprofessional service settings, for both learners and patients.

Financial Impact of the Indiana University Student-Run Free Clinic.

Student-run free clinics (SRFCs) serve as an important public safety-net for un- and under-insured patients. Few studies have investigated their financial impact or return of investment to the community. The aim of this study was to estimate the financial impact of the Indiana University Student Outreach Clinic (IUSOC) using national market values of medical visits and lab services in 2021.From internal triage classification records maintained from March to December 2021, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were assigned corresponding to "New Patient," "Returning Quick or Long" and "Fast Track" visits. Total Work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) were calculated to then estimate the total monetary value for medical services. Similarly, the collection of laboratory services rendered from March to December 2021 were assigned costs using the 2021 Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) fee schedule.There were a total of 1475 medical visits identified in this study under the triage categories of interest, with 440 New Patient visits, 1032 Returning Quick and Long visits, and 3 Fast Track visits. From the calculated total wRVUs, the estimated monetary value for medical services was $95,413.79. Additionally, there were 3633 eligible lab tests ordered; almost half of these (1523, 41.9%) were categorized as routine lab tests (CMP, BMP, CBC, lipid panel). The estimated value of lab services was $56,296.81.Our estimates reveal that the IUSOC provided nearly $150,000 worth of free healthcare to the community in 2021. Further, most patients were seen for return visits, revealing the opportunity to streamline logistics.

Imaging Among the Underserved: Utilization and Expenditures in a Student-Run Free Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To determine imaging utilization and expenditures among an underserved population at a student-run free clinic. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of billing records for all radiology studies performed over a 4-year period at a student-run free clinic supervised by physician faculty. All imaging services were outsourced through either direct payment by the clinic to a local imaging group or through in-kind donations. Radiology studies were grouped by modality and diagnostic category. Data were analyzed to determine overall and average imaging utilization and expenditures. RESULTS: Across the 4-year study period, 413 radiology studies were performed with a yearly average of 103 (SD = 16). During this time, 192 (46%) ultrasounds, 123 (30%) radiographic studies, 40 (10%) MRIs, 37 (9%) CTs, 8 (2%) interventional procedures, and 5 (1%) nuclear imaging studies were obtained. Overall, expenditures were $157,888 with a yearly average of $39,472 (SD = $1982). In-kind donations accounted for $138,508 (88%) of expenditures. Across the 4-year study period, utilization increased by 15% with less than 1% increase in expenditures. DISCUSSION: Ultrasound was the most common imaging modality used. Overall imaging utilization was considerably less than that of published data in an ambulatory setting.

Assessing Spanish Health Literacy and Cervical Cancer Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors in a Student-Run Free Clinic.

While the incidence of cervical cancer continues to decrease, there is a significant discrepancy in incidence rates and screening behaviors among Hispanic and non-Hispanic white patients in the USA. This project examines the relationship between Spanish health literacy and cervical cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and practices among native Spanish-speaking patients at risk for cervical cancer at the USF BRIDGE Healthcare Clinic, a student-run free clinic in Tampa, FL. Spanish-speaking patients ≥21 years (n = 34) participated in a quality improvement project that included an assessment of Spanish health literacy and a written survey on cervical cancer knowledge. Chi-squared tests were performed to assess potential relationships between health literacy and cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, health behaviors, and demographics. Seven participants (20.6%) scored between 0 and 14 on the SAHL-S, indicating inadequate health literacy. A significant difference in cervical cancer health knowledge was found between patients with adequate health literacy compared to patients with inadequate health literacy (p = 0.002). There is a potential association between low Spanish health literacy and subsequent poorer understanding of cervical cancer in BRIDGE patients. This implies that patients of low health literacy may have poorer comprehension of other aspects of their care beyond cervical cancer screening. Strategies are discussed to improve communication with BRIDGE patients of low Spanish health literacy that may be applicable to other patient populations.

Women's Health Maintenance Efforts at a Student-Run Free Clinic in South Florida Exceeded National Trends During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic posed a setback to health maintenance screenings worldwide. These delays have impacted minorities and those of low socioeconomic status in the same way that disparities in cancer screenings have historically trended. Here, we evaluated the performance of a student-run free clinic in maintaining women up-to-date with cancer screenings before, during, and after the pandemic in relation to national trends. We identified all women eligible for screening mammography and cervical cancer screenings between 2018 and 2022 at the clinic (N = 185). Adequate adherence to screening was defined according to the American Cancer Society (ACS) recommendations for breast mammography, and the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines for cervical cancer screenings. For cervical cancer screening, 166 female patients seen between 2018 and 2022 were eligible, and up-to-date proportions were as follows: 81.3% in 2018; 90.9% in 2019; 83.3% in 2020; 93.3% in 2021; 93.8% in 2022. For breast surveillance, 143 women were eligible for screening mammography, and up-to-date proportions were as follows: 66.7% in 2018; 62.5% in 2019; 91.7% in 2020; 73.1% in 2021; 84.1% in 2022. These proportions were higher than or near national averages.In conclusion, adherence remained steady during the pandemic and was not subject to the declines seen nationally. Our clinic represents an effective model for promoting women's health maintenance and tempering the disparities seen among women of low socioeconomic status.

Breast and cervical cancer screening rates in student-run free clinics: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess rates of breast and cervical cancer screening at student-run free clinics to understand challenges and strategies for advancing quality and accessibility of women's health screening. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic search of publications in Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from database inception to 2020. English-language publications assessing rates of breast and cervical cancer screening in student-run free clinics were included. Structured data extraction was completed for each publication by two reviewers independently. Risk of bias was assessed using a modified Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality checklist. Results were synthesized qualitatively because of study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of 3634 references identified, 12 references met study inclusion criteria. The proportion of patients up-to-date on breast cancer screening per guidelines ranged from 45% to 94%. The proportion of patients up-to-date on cervical cancer screening per guidelines ranged from 40% to 88%. CONCLUSION: Student-run free clinics can match breast and cervical cancer screening rates among uninsured populations nationally, although more work is required to bridge the gap in care that exists for the underinsured and uninsured.