Facing a request for assisted death - views of Finnish physicians, a mixed method study.

BACKGROUND: Assisted death, including euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), is under debate worldwide, and these practices are adopted in many Western countries. Physicians' attitudes toward assisted death vary across the globe, but little is known about physicians' actual reactions when facing a request for assisted death. There is a clear gap in evidence on how physicians act and respond to patients' requests for assisted death in countries where these actions are not legal. METHODS: A survey including statements concerning euthanasia and PAS and an open question about their actions when facing a request for assisted death was sent to all Finnish physicians. Quantitative data are presented as numbers and percentages. Statistical significance was tested by using the Pearson chi-square test, when appropriate. The qualitative analysis was performed by using an inductive content analysis approach, where categories emerge from the data. RESULTS: Altogether, 6889 physicians or medical students answered the survey, yielding a response rate of 26%. One-third of participants agreed or partly agreed that they could assist a patient in a suicide. The majority (69%) of the participants fully or partly agreed that euthanasia should only be accepted due to difficult physical symptoms, while 12% fully or partly agreed that life turning into a burden should be an acceptable reason for euthanasia. Of the participants, 16% had faced a request for euthanasia or PAS, and 3033 answers from 2565 respondents were achieved to the open questions concerning their actions regarding the request and ethical aspects of assisted death. In the qualitative analysis, six main categories, including 22 subcategories, were formed regarding the phenomenon of how physicians act when facing this request. The six main categories were as follows: providing an alternative to the request, enabling care and support, ignoring the request, giving a reasoned refusal, complying with the request, and seeing the request as a possibility. CONCLUSIONS: Finnish physicians' actions regarding the requests for assisted death, and attitudes toward euthanasia and PAS vary substantially. Open discussion, education, and recommendations concerning a request for assisted death and ethics around it are also highly needed in countries where euthanasia and PAS are not legal.

Creating a safer and better functioning system: Lessons to be learned from the Netherlands for an ethical defence of an autonomy-only approach to assisted dying.

The proposal to allow assisted dying for people who are not severely ill reignited the Dutch end-of-life debate when it was submitted in 2016. A key criticism of this proposal is that it is too radical a departure from the safe and well-functioning system the Netherlands already has. The goal of this article is to respond to this criticism and question whether the Dutch system really can be described as safe and well functioning. I will reconsider the usefulness of the suffering criterion, and I will ultimately argue this criterion should be rejected altogether. Instead, we should consider moving towards an autonomy-only approach to assisted dying. This would resolve some significant issues occurring under the current system of assisted dying in the Netherlands and ultimately make the process safer and better functioning. I will then consider some possible objections to adopting an autonomy-only approach and provide some preliminary responses to these also. I will finally highlight some potential areas where further research may be necessary, namely, how to mitigate the effect of external factors such as poverty or other life aspects that may have the potential to distort the individual's ability to make autonomous decisions. I will also consider some possible international lessons that can be taken from both current as well as the proposed practice in the Netherlands.

Rural healthcare professionals' participation in Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD): beyond a binary decision.

BACKGROUND: Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) was legalized in Canada in 2016 and amended in 2021. At the time that this study was conducted, the federal government was considering expanding the eligibility criteria to include patients whose death was not reasonably foreseeable. The purpose of this study was to better understand rural healthcare professionals' experiences with assisted dying set against the backdrop of legislative expansion. METHODS: A qualitative exploratory study was undertaken with general rural practice physicians, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, ethicists, patients, and patient families in rural Southern Alberta, Canada. For this paper, data from 18 audio-recorded and transcribed semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals were analyzed using thematic analysis. Categories and patterns of shared meaning that linked to an overarching theme were identified. RESULTS: Between the binary positions of full support for and conscientious objection to assisted dying, rural healthcare professionals' decisions to participate in MAiD was based on their moral convictions, various contextual factors, and their participation thresholds. Factors including patient suffering; personal and professional values and beliefs; relationships with colleagues, patients and family, and community; and changing MAiD policy and legislation created nuances that informed their decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: The interplay of multiple factors and their degree of influence on healthcare professionals' decision-making create multiple decision points between full support for and participation in MAiD processes and complete opposition and/or abstention. Moreover, our findings suggest evolving policy and legislation have the potential to increase rural healthcare professionals' uncertainty and level of discomfort in providing services. We propose that the binary language typically used in the MAiD discourse be reframed to reflect that decision-making processes and actions are often fluid and situational.

A Moratorium on the Euphemism MAID.

It is essential for high-quality health care for providers to adhere to the principle of truth telling, speaking with clarity and honesty. The euphemism medical aid in dying, MAID, is being mainstreamed in the medical literature by proponents of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. This trend is deleterious because MAID's proponents do not consistently express the meaning and intent of the practice, and the phrase downplays the fact that a provider is participating in the act of death for a patient. The euphemism blurs the differences between providing high-quality palliative care and participating in the death of a patient prior to a natural death. Some believe the term MAID is used exclusively for assisted suicide in patients with a terminal diagnosis with less than 6 months to live, when in fact it is being used for both assisted suicide and euthanasia and for patients who have no terminal diagnosis with potentially years to live. We are calling up on our colleagues to cease the use of this and other euphemisms in this ethically controversial practice. We recommend standardized language that accurately denotes the context and process. Provider Assisted Death by Prescription (PAD-P) and Provider Assisted Death by Administration (PAD-A) are terms that most accurately describe the process, taking into account who is prescribing or administering a lethal substance and the outcome of the actions. Literature that addresses this practice should be described as ending life literature. The standardized language needs to be used on death certificates so we can most accurately assess the impact that provider-assisted death is having on society. Emphasizing truth telling in morally controversial practices will foster trust among health care providers and with patients.

Assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders: a review of clinical-ethical arguments and recommendations.

Persons with mental disorders have the same right to self-determination as patients with somatic diseases, also regarding death and dying. However, there are several challenges that render persons with mental disorders especially vulnerable to inappropriate conduct of assisted suicide: their wish to die may be a symptom of their mental disease and not an autonomous choice, decision-making competence may be compromised by their illness and more difficult to assess, the severity of suffering may be more difficult to evaluate from an external perspective, the wish to die may be more variable over time and the prognostic uncertainty in mental illness makes it more difficult to determine whether the severe suffering is, in fact, treatment-resistant. After reviewing the clinical and ethical background of assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders, we assess each of these challenges to a medically and ethically justified practice of assisted suicide in mentally ill persons, based on relevant clinical and ethical literature. We conclude that the only ethically valid argument to exclude persons with mental disorders from suicide assistance is their potential inability to make a free, autonomous decision. However, the mentioned challenges should be taken into account in evaluating a person's request for assisted suicide and for promoting her well-informed and deliberated decision-making. In addition to assessing the person's decision-making capacity, the evaluation process should be guided by the goal to empower the person to make an autonomous choice between the available options. We conclude the paper with perspectives for a clinically and ethically justified practice of evaluating requests for assisted suicide in persons with mental disorders.

Residency Requirements for Medical Aid in Dying.

In 1997, when Oregon became the first U.S. jurisdiction authorizing medical aid in dying (MAID), its law included a requirement that patients be legal residents of the state. Other U.S. jurisdictions legalizing MAID followed Oregon in adopting residency requirements. Recent litigation challenges the legality, as well as the justification, for such requirements. Facing such challenges, Oregon and Vermont eliminated their MAID residency requirements. More states could follow this move, for, in certain circumstances, the U.S. Constitution's privileges and immunities clause protects citizens' right to travel to secure medical care. Policy considerations could also motivate states to reexamine whether such requirements are justified in light of existing evidence of how MAID laws have been applied.

No (true) right to die: barriers in access to physician-assisted death in case of psychiatric disease, advanced dementia or multiple geriatric syndromes in the Netherlands.

Even in the Netherlands, where the practice of physician-assisted death (PAD) has been legalized for over 20 years, there is no such thing as a 'right to die'. Especially patients with extraordinary requests, such as a wish for PAD based on psychiatric suffering, advanced dementia, or (a limited number of) multiple geriatric syndromes, encounter barriers in access to PAD. In this paper, we discuss whether these barriers can be justified in the context of the Dutch situation where PAD is legally permitted for those who suffer unbearably and hopelessly as a result of medical conditions. Furthermore, we explore whether there are options to address some of the barriers or their consequences, both within the Dutch legal framework or by adjusting the legal framework, and whether these options are feasible. We conclude that although there are insufficient arguments to overrule the doctor's freedom of conscience in the Netherlands, there are ways to address some of the barriers, mainly by offering support to doctors that would be willing to support a request. Moreover, we believe it is morally required to reduce or mitigate where possible the negative consequences of the barriers for patients, such as the long waiting time for those who suffer from psychiatric disorders, because it is unlikely the adjustments suggested to the system will ensure reasonable access for these patient groups.

The debate rages on: physician-assisted suicide in an ethical light.

The British Medical Association and some Royal Colleges have recently changed their stance on physician-assisted suicide from 'opposed' to forms of 'neutral'. The Royal College of Anaesthetists will poll members soon on whether to follow suit. Elsewhere neutrality amongst professional bodies has preceded legalisation of physician-assisted suicide. We examine the arguments relevant to the anaesthesia community and its potential impact in the UK.

Eutanásia Voluntária Ativa, Suicídio Assistido, Ortotanásia e os Cuidados Paliativos: um panorama das discussões no Poder Legislativo Federal Brasileiro / Eutanàsia Voluntària Activa, Suïcidi Assistit, Ortotanàsia i Cures Pal·liatives: un panorama de les discussions en el Poder Legislatiu Federal brasiler / Eutanasia Voluntaria Activa, Suicidio Asistido, Ortotanasia y Cuidados Paliativos: un panorama de las discusiones en el Poder Legislativo Federal brasileño / Voluntary Active Euthanasia, Assisted Suicide, Orthothanasia and Palliative Care: An overview of the discussions in the Brazilian Federal Legislative Power

No âmbito das proposições legislativas brasileiras, buscou-se compreender os desafiose obstáculos no percurso delimitativo das práticas de fim de vida. Analisou-se 193 documentos, desde 1981 até 2020, com base na metodologia hermenêutica-dialética. Evidenciou-se distintas propostas regulamentadoras das práticas de eutanásia e ortotanásia,na relação com os cuidados paliativos. As associações dos termos “cuidados paliativos” e “ortotanásia”, em oposição à “eutanásia/suicídio assistido, revelaram a conflituosa construção de valores que perpassa nossa sociedade. Com a tramitação de projetos relacionados à ortotanásia e eutanásia, compreendemos o sentido das decisões políticas que envolvem as possibilidades de escolhas e liberdade das pessoas, entre o direito à vida e o direito à morte digna. Compreendemos a problemática da legalização da ortotanásia, como forma do poder legislativo se furtar ao debate sobre a eutanásia/suicídio assistido, como alternativa à distanásia e ao sofrimento no processo de morrer.(AU)

En el context de les propostes legislatives brasileres, busquem comprendre els reptes i obstacles en el camí cap a la delimitació de les pràctiques al final de la vida. S'han analitzat 193 documents, des de 1981 fins a 2020, basant-se en la metodologia hermenèutica-dialèctica. S'han evidenciat diferents propostes normatives per a les pràctiques d'eutanàsia i ortotanàsia, en relació als cures pal·liatius. Les associacions dels termes "cures pal·liatius" i "ortotanàsia", en oposició a "eutanàsia/suïcidi assistit", revelen la construcció conflictiva de valors que impregna la nostra societat. Amb la tramitació dels projectes relacionats amb la ortotanàsia i l'eutanàsia, entenem el sentit de les decisions polítiques que implica les possibilitats de tria i llibertat de les persones, entre el dret a la vida i el dret a una mort digna. Comprenguem el problema de la legalització de la ortotanàsia com una forma que el poder legislatiu eviti el debat sobre l'eutanàsia/suïcidi assistit, com a alternativa a la distanàsia i al patiment en el procés de morir.(AU)

En el ámbito de las propuestas legislativas brasileñas, se buscó comprender los desafíos y obstáculos en el camino de la regulación de las prácticas al final de la vida. Se analizaron 193 documentos desde 1981 hasta 2020, utilizando la metodología hermenéutica-dialéctica. Se evidenciaron diferentes propuestas regulatorias relacionadas con la eutanasia y la ortotanasia, en relación con los cuidados paliativos. La asociación de los términos "cuidados paliativos" y "ortotanasia", en contraposición a "eutanasia/suicidio asistido", reveló la conflictiva construcción de valores que atraviesa nuestra sociedad. Con la tramitación de proyectos relacionados con la ortotanasia y la eutanasia, comprendemos el sentido de las decisiones políticas que involucran las posibilidades de elección y libertad de las personas, entre el derecho a la vida y el derecho a una muerte digna. También comprendemos la problemática de la legalización de la ortotanasia como una forma de que el poder legislativo evite el debate sobre la eutanasia/suicidio asistido, como una alternativa a la distanasia y al sufrimiento en el proceso de morir.(AU)

Within the scope of Brazilian legislative proposals, we sought to understand the challenges and obstacles in the delimiting path of end-of-life practices. 193 documents were analyzed, from 1981 to 2020, based on the hermeneutic-dialectical methodology. Different regulatory proposals for the practices of euthanasia and orthothanasia, in relation to palliative care, were evidenced. The associations of the terms “palliative care” and “orthothanasia”, as opposed to “euthanasia/assisted suicide, revealed the conflicting construction of values that permeates our society. With the processing of projects related to orthothanasia and euthanasia, we understand the meaning of political decisions that involve the possibilities of choices and freedom of people, between the right to life and the right to a dignified death. We understand the problem of legalizing orthothanasia as a way for the legislative power to evade the debate on euthanasia/assisted suicide, as an alternative to dysthanasia and suffering in the dying process.(AU)

A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Perspectives of Dignity and Assisted Dying.

INTRODUCTION: The debate on assisted dying and its components, euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide has evolved with the emergence of the right to dignity and the wish to hasten death (WTHD). Whilst shaped by local legal and sociocultural considerations, appreciation of how patients, healthcare professionals and lawmakers relate notions of dignity to self-concepts of personhood and the desire for assisted dying will better inform and direct support of patients. METHODS: Guided by the Systematic Evidence Based Approach, a systematic scoping review (SSR in SEBA) on perspectives of dignity, WTHD and personhood featured in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CINAHL, Scopus databases and four key Palliative Care journals was conducted. The review hinged on the following questions: "what is the relationship between dignity and the wish to hasten death (WTHD) in the assisted dying debate?", "how is dignity conceptualised by patients with WTHD?" and "what are prevailing perspectives on the role of assisted dying in maintaining a dying patient's dignity?" RESULTS: 6947 abstracts were identified, 663 full text articles reviewed, and 88 articles included. The four domains identified include 1) concepts of dignity through the lens of the Ring Theory of Personhood (RToP) including their various definitions and descriptions; 2) the relationship between dignity, WTHD and assisted dying with loss of dignity and autonomy foregrounded; 3) stakeholder perspectives for and against assisted dying including those of patient, healthcare provider and lawmaker; and 4) other dignity-conserving measures as alternatives to assisted dying. CONCLUSION: Concepts of dignity constantly evolve throughout the patient's end of life journey. Understanding when and how these concepts of personhood change and trigger the fear of a loss of dignity or intractable suffering could direct timely, individualised and appropriate person-centred dignity conserving measures. We believe an RToP-based tool could fulfil this role and further study into the design of this tool is planned.