Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 313
Filter
1.
Int J Public Health ; 69: 1606962, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698912

ABSTRACT

Objectives: We explored characteristics of people with an accumulation of health problems related to old age requesting euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (EAS) and identified characteristics associated with granting EAS requests. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire study among Dutch physicians on characteristics of these people requesting EAS (n = 123). Associations between characteristics and granting a request were assessed using logistic regression analyses. Results: People requesting EAS were predominantly >80 years old (82.4%), female (70.0%), widow/widower (71.7%), (partially) care-dependent (76.7%), and had a life expectancy >12 months (68.6%). The most prevalent health problems were osteoarthritis (70.4%) and impaired vision and hearing (53.0% and 40.9%). The most cited reasons to request EAS were physical deterioration (68.6%) and dependence (61.2%). 44.7% of requests were granted. Granting a request was positively associated with care dependence, disability/immobility, impaired vision, osteoporosis, loss of control, suffering without prospect of improvement and a treatment relationship with the physician >12 months. Conclusion: Enhanced understanding of people with an accumulation of health problems related to old age requesting EAS can contribute to the ongoing debate on the permissibility of EAS in people without life-threatening conditions.


Subject(s)
Physicians , Suicide, Assisted , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Netherlands , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Surveys and Questionnaires , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/psychology , Middle Aged , Euthanasia/statistics & numerical data
2.
CMAJ Open ; 10(1): E19-E26, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35042691

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is little evidence describing the technical aspects of medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada, such as medications, dosages and complications. Our objective was to describe clinical practice in providing MAiD in Ontario and Vancouver, Canada, and explore relations between medications used, time until death and complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of a sample of adult (age ≥ 18 yr) patients who received MAiD in Ontario between 2016 and 2018, and patients who received MAiD in 1 of 3 Canadian academic hospitals (in Hamilton and Ottawa, Ontario, and Vancouver, British Colombia) between 2019 and 2020. We used de-identified data for 2016-2018 from the Office of the Chief Coroner for Ontario MAiD Database and chart review data for 2019-2020 from the 3 centres. We used multivariable parametric survival analysis to identify relations between medications, dosages and time from procedure start until death. RESULTS: The sample included 3557 patients (1786 men [50.2%] and 1770 women [49.8%] with a mean age of 74 [standard deviation 13] yr). The majority of patients (2519 [70.8%]) had a diagnosis of cancer. The medications most often used were propofol (3504 cases [98.5%]), midazolam (3251 [91.4%]) and rocuronium (3228 [90.8%]). The median time from the first injection until death was 9 (interquartile range 6) minutes. Standard-dose lidocaine (40-60 mg) and high-dose propofol (> 1000 mg) were associated with prolonged time until death (prolonged by a median of 1 min and 3 min, respectively). Complications occurred in 41 cases (1.2%), mostly related to venous access or need for administration of a second medication. INTERPRETATION: In a large sample of patients who died with medical assistance, certain medications were associated with small differences in time from injection to death, and complications were rare. More research is needed to identify the medication protocols that predict outcomes consistent with patient and family expectations for a medically assisted death.


Subject(s)
Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms , Palliative Care , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/adverse effects , Canada/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Drug Dosage Calculations , Female , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/mortality , Neoplasms/therapy , Palliative Care/methods , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Care Management/methods , Time-to-Treatment
4.
JAMA Intern Med ; 181(2): 245-250, 2021 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33284324

ABSTRACT

Importance: The Dutch Regional Euthanasia Review Committees (RTEs) reviewed and reported an increasing number of cases of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (EAS) requested by older people with multiple geriatric syndromes (MGS). Knowledge of the characteristics of cases of EAS for MGS is important to facilitate societal debate and to monitor EAS practice. Objective: To examine the accumulation of patient characteristics, geriatric syndromes, and other circumstances as reported in the case summaries of the RTEs that led to unbearable suffering associated with a request for EAS and to analyze the RTEs' assessments of these cases of EAS. Design, Setting, and Participants: A qualitative content analysis was conducted of all case summaries filed from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2019, under the category MGS and published in a national open access database. These case summaries were selected by the RTEs from the total of 1605 reported cases of EAS in the category MGS. Results: The RTEs published 53 cases (41 [77%] female) under the category MGS. A total of 28 patients (53%) had always perceived themselves as independent, active, and socially involved. None of the patients suffered from life-threatening conditions. Multiple geriatric syndromes, such as visual impairment (34 cases [64%]), hearing loss (28 cases [53%]), pain (25 cases [47%]), and chronic tiredness (22 cases [42%]), were common. The request for EAS was often preceded by a sequence of events, especially recurrent falls (33 cases [62%]). Although physical suffering could be determined in all cases, the case descriptions found that suffering occurred on multiple dimensions, such as the loss of mobility (44 [83%]), fears (21 [40%]), dependence (23 [43%]), and social isolation (19 [36%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This qualitative study suggests that an accumulation of geriatric syndromes leading to a request for EAS is often intertwined with the social and existential dimension of suffering. This leads to a complex interplay of physical, psychological, and existential suffering that changes over time.


Subject(s)
Euthanasia/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Chronic Conditions/epidemiology , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Accidental Falls , Aged, 80 and over , Disabled Persons , Female , Humans , Male , Mobility Limitation , Netherlands/epidemiology , Social Isolation
5.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 25(1): 2-18, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32729770

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Interest in the topic of termination of life has been growing for 2 decades. After legalisation of active euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS) in the Netherlands in 2002, movements to implement similar laws started in other European countries. However, many people objected to legalisation on the basis of the experiences in the Netherlands and as a matter of principal. METHODS: This selected and focussed review presents the theoretical discussions about EAS and describes the respective parliamentary discussions in Germany and the data and experiences in the Netherlands. It also considers people with mental disorders in the context of termination-of-life services. RESULTS: So far, only a few European countries have introduced legislation on EAS. Legalisation of EAS in the Netherlands resulted in an unexpectedly large increase in cases. The number of people with mental disorders who terminate their lives on request remains low. CONCLUSIONS: Experience from the Netherlands shows that widening criteria for EAS has problematic consequences.KEY POINTSTermination of life on request, which a subgroup of people support, is a matter of ongoing debate.Because of several problematic aspects, including ethical considerations, only a few countries in the world allow active euthanasia or assisted suicide.Even if euthanasia is well regulated, legalising it can have problematic consequences that are difficult to control, such as an unwanted excessive increase in euthanasia cases.The well-documented experiences with the euthanasia law in the Netherlands serve as an example of what is to be expected when euthanasia is legalised.We need to pay close attention to the relationship between suicide and suicide prevention on the one hand and euthanasia acts and promotion of euthanasia on the other.Further ethical, psychological and legal research is needed. In particular, the role of palliative medicine in societies' approach to end-of-life care must be explored in much more detail.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Attitude to Death , Euthanasia , Legislation, Medical , Mentally Ill Persons , Suicide, Assisted , Europe , Euthanasia/ethics , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Euthanasia/statistics & numerical data , Germany , Humans , Legislation, Medical/ethics , Legislation, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Mentally Ill Persons/legislation & jurisprudence , Mentally Ill Persons/statistics & numerical data , Netherlands , Suicide, Assisted/ethics , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data
6.
CMAJ Open ; 8(4): E825-E831, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33293332

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bill C-14, the legislation that legalized medical assistance in dying (MAiD) in Canada in 2016, outlines eligibility criteria and includes both a mandated 10-day reflection period and a requirement that the patient have capacity to consent at the time MAiD is provided. We examined clinical factors associated with shortened reflection periods or loss of capacity before provision of MAiD. METHODS: This retrospective database review involved patients who requested MAiD at a tertiary care hospital in Toronto, Canada, between June 2016 and April 2019. We used logistic regression analyses to examine the association between the combined outcome of unanticipated loss of decisional capacity, shortening of the reflection period or death and the clinical risk factors of interest (age, sex, location of MAiD request [inpatient v. outpatient], score on palliative performance scale [PPS] and diagnosis [cancer v. noncancer]). We generated receiver operating characteristic curves to identify the PPS score (encompassing 5 functional domains: ambulation, activity level, self-care, intake and level of consciousness) that best predicted loss of capacity, shortening of the reflection period or death. RESULTS: In total, 155 patients requested assessment for MAiD, and 136 of these were included in the statistical analyses. For 68 patients, the reflection period was not shortened; the other 68 patients lost capacity, died or required shortening of the reflection period. In contrast to the results for age, sex, location of request and diagnosis, the PPS score was associated with loss of capacity or shortening of the reflection period (odds ratio 4.63, 95% confidence interval 2.87-8.23, per 10-point decrease in PPS score). PPS scores less than or equal to 40% balanced sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value while emphasizing sensitivity to prevent false negative errors. INTERPRETATION: The PPS score at the time of MAiD request was strongly associated with loss of capacity or shortening of the reflection period, with lower scores incrementally increasing the risk of these outcomes. For patients with a PPS score of 40% or below, close monitoring is warranted, potentially with plans made to allow rapid provision of MAiD should their clinical condition deteriorate.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Palliative Care/standards , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mental Competency , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ontario , Physical Functional Performance , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Survival Rate , Tertiary Care Centers
7.
Dtsch Med Wochenschr ; 145(22): e123-e129, 2020 11.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33049787

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are controversially discussed in Germany. Empirical studies are missing to estimate their respective incidence, including passive and indirect euthanasia in German hospitals. Physicians and nurses in German hospitals were surveyed regarding their practice of euthanasia and possible influence factors. METHOD: Information on euthanasia practice was obtained using descriptive terms and related definitions in an anonymous online survey. Participants' objective and subjective occupational situations and support of euthanasia were recorded. The final samples comprised N = 2507 physicians and N = 2683 nurses. RESULT: The practice of passive and indirect euthanasia was reported by a large number of physicians and nurses during the last 24 months, active euthanasia and assisted suicide was reported by substantially less participants. Variance among the practice of active euthanasia could be explained by occupational factors and the respective advocacy of euthanasia amongst other variables, but not by subjective burden. DISCUSSION: Euthanasia is practiced by physicians and nurses in German hospitals. The Incidence of different types of euthanasia and relevant influence factors are discussed considering methodical limitations.


Subject(s)
Euthanasia/statistics & numerical data , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Attitude of Health Personnel , Germany , Humans , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 34(5): 518-520, sept.-oct. 2020. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-198876

ABSTRACT

El uso de estudios basados en encuestas online se ha extendido de manera notable. A pesar de tener tasas de respuesta especialmente pequeñas, permiten obtener con facilidad un gran tamaño de muestra. Sin embargo, esta estrategia puede conllevar un sesgo de selección que comprometa notablemente los resultados. Se comparan los resultados de dos encuestas sobre la regulación de la eutanasia y el suicidio asistido, una online con muestra autoseleccionada y la otra con muestreo aleatorio, realizadas en 2018 entre los/las colegiados/as del Colegio de Médicos de Bizkaia. Las tasas de respuesta fueron del 10,4% (encuesta online) y del 87,8% (encuesta aleatoria). No se encontraron diferencias en las características sociodemográficas, aunque sí en las de opinión, de manera que el porcentaje de personas contrarias a la regulación de la eutanasia estaba sobrestimado. Los resultados de este estudio muestran que dicha estrategia de muestreo genera sesgos en los resultados, alguno de ellos difícilmente detectable y reparable


The use of studies based on online surveys has expanded significantly. Despite having particularly small response rates, they allow a large sample size to be easily obtained. However, this strategy may entail a selection bias that significantly compromises the results. The results of two surveys on the regulation of euthanasia and assisted suicide are compared. One is an online survey with a self-selected sample and the other a survey with random sampling, conducted in 2018 among the members of the Medical Association of Bizkaia. The response rates were 10.4% (online survey) and 87.8% (random survey). No differences were found in sociodemographic characteristics, although there were differences in the opinion variables, so that the percentage of people who opposed euthanasia regulation was overestimated. The results of this study show that this sampling strategy generates biases in the results, some of which are difficult both to detect and to repair


Subject(s)
Humans , Surveys and Questionnaires/classification , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Euthanasia/statistics & numerical data , Internet Access/statistics & numerical data , Selection Bias , Sample Size , Data Collection/methods , Reproducibility of Results
9.
Med Care ; 58(8): 665-673, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32520768

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many people with terminal illness prefer to die in home-like settings-including care homes, hospices, or palliative care units-rather than an acute care hospital. Home-based palliative care services can increase the likelihood of death in a community setting, but the provision of these services may increase costs relative to usual care. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the incremental cost per community death for persons enrolled in end-of-life home care in Ontario, Canada, who died between 2011 and 2015. METHODS: Using a population-based cohort of 50,068 older adults, we determined the total cost of care in the last 90 days of life, as well as the incremental cost to achieve an additional community death for persons enrolled in end-of-life home care, in comparison with propensity score-matched individuals under usual care (ie, did not receive home care services in the last 90 days of life). RESULTS: Recipients of end-of-life home care were nearly 3 times more likely to experience a community death than individuals not receiving home care services, and the incremental cost to achieve an additional community death through the provision of end-of-life home care was CAN$995 (95% confidence interval: -$547 to $2392). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that a modest investment in end-of-life home care has the potential to improve the dying experience of community-dwelling older adults by enabling fewer deaths in acute care hospitals.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis/standards , Investments/standards , Suicide, Assisted/economics , Terminal Care/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Female , Home Care Services/economics , Home Care Services/trends , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Investments/statistics & numerical data , Male , Ontario , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/methods , Terminal Care/trends
10.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 163(4): 759-762, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32427518

ABSTRACT

A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using data from Oregon's Death with Dignity Act (DWDA) to characterize patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who seek physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Between 1998 and 2018, a total of 57 patients with HNC received DWDA prescriptions, of whom 39 (68.4%) died by administration of the prescribed medication. There were no associated complications with medication administration. The most commonly involved subsites were oral cavity (33.3%) and oropharynx (30.8%), and the most commonly cited end-of-life concerns were loss of ability to engage in activities that make life enjoyable (79.5%) and loss of autonomy (74.4%). There were no differences in age, race, marital status, or hospice enrollment rates between patients with HNC who died by administration and those who were prescribed but did not administer the medication. Patients who died by administration were generally less educated as compared to those who were prescribed but did not administer the medication (P = .015).


Subject(s)
Head and Neck Neoplasms , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Oregon , Retrospective Studies , Right to Die/legislation & jurisprudence , Socioeconomic Factors , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence
11.
CMAJ ; 192(8): E173-E181, 2020 02 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32051130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Medical assistance in dying (MAiD) was legalized across Canada in June 2016. Some have expressed concern that patient requests for MAiD might be driven by poor access to palliative care and that social and economic vulnerability of patients may influence access to or receipt of MAiD. To examine these concerns, we describe Ontario's early experience with MAiD and compare MAiD decedents with the general population of decedents in Ontario. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing all MAiD-related deaths with all deaths in Ontario, Canada, between June 7, 2016, and Oct. 31, 2018. Clinical and demographic characteristics were collected for all MAiD decedents and compared with those of all Ontario decedents when possible. We used logistic regression analyses to describe the association of demographic and clinical factors with receipt of MAiD. RESULTS: A total of 2241 patients (50.2% women) were included in the MAiD cohort, and 186 814 in the general Ontario decedent cohort. Recipients of MAiD reported both physical (99.5%) and psychologic suffering (96.4%) before the procedure. In 74.4% of cases, palliative care providers were involved in the patient's care at the time of the MAiD request. The statutory 10-day reflection period was shortened for 26.6% of people. Compared with all Ontario decedents, MAiD recipients were younger (mean 74.4 v. 77.0 yr, standardized difference 0.18);, more likely to be from a higher income quintile (24.9% v. 15.6%, standardized difference across quintiles 0.31); less likely to reside in an institution (6.3% v. 28.0%, standardized difference 0.6); more likely to be married (48.5% v. 40.6%) and less likely to be widowed (25.7% v. 35.8%, standardized difference 0.34); and more likely to have a cancer diagnosis (64.4% v. 27.6%, standardized difference 0.88 for diagnoses comparisons). INTERPRETATION: Recipients of MAiD were younger, had higher income, were substantially less likely to reside in an institution and were more likely to be married than decedents from the general population, suggesting that MAiD is unlikely to be driven by social or economic vulnerability. Given the high prevalence of physical and psychologic suffering, despite involvement of palliative care providers in caring for patients who request MAiD, future studies should aim to improve our understanding and treatment of the specific types of suffering that lead to a MAiD request.


Subject(s)
Income/statistics & numerical data , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Institutionalization/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Neurodegenerative Diseases/epidemiology , Ontario/epidemiology , Residence Characteristics , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Widowhood/statistics & numerical data
12.
BMC Palliat Care ; 19(1): 4, 2020 Jan 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31901225

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Austria has recently been embroiled in the complex debate on the legalization of measures to end life prematurely. Empirical data on end-of-life decisions made by Austrian physicians barely exists. This study is the first in Austria aimed at finding out how physicians generally approach and make end-of-life therapy decisions. METHODS: The European end-of-life decisions (EURELD) questionnaire, translated and adapted by Schildmann et al., was used to conduct this cross-sectional postal survey. Questions on palliative care training, legal issues, and use of and satisfaction with palliative care were added. All Austrian specialists in hematology and oncology, a representative sample of doctors specialized in internal medicine, and a sample of general practitioners, were invited to participate in this anonymous postal survey. RESULTS: Five hundred forty-eight questionnaires (response rate: 10.4%) were evaluated. 88.3% of participants had treated a patient who had died in the previous 12 months. 23% of respondents had an additional qualification in palliative medicine. The cause of death in 53.1% of patients was cancer, and 44.8% died at home. In 86.3% of cases, pain relief and / or symptom relief had been intensified. Further treatment had been withheld by 60.0%, and an existing treatment discontinued by 49.1% of respondents. In 5 cases, the respondents had prescribed, provided or administered a drug which had resulted in death. 51.3% of physicians said they would never carry out physician-assisted suicide (PAS), while 30.3% could imagine doing so under certain conditions. 38.5% of respondents supported the current prohibition of PAS, 23.9% opposed it, and 33.2% were undecided. 52.4% of physicians felt the legal situation with respect to measures to end life prematurely was ambiguous. An additional qualification in palliative medicine had no influence on measures taken, or attitudes towards PAS. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of doctors perform symptom control in terminally ill patients. PAS is frequently requested but rarely carried out. Attending physicians felt the legal situation was ambiguous. Physicians should therefore receive training in current legislation relating to end-of-life choices and medical decisions. The data collected in this survey will help political decision-makers provide the necessary legal framework for end-of-life medical care.


Subject(s)
Decision Making , Physicians/psychology , Suicide, Assisted/psychology , Terminal Care/trends , Adult , Aged , Attitude of Health Personnel , Austria , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Terminal Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Terminal Care/methods
13.
Psychiatr Pol ; 54(4): 661-672, 2020 Aug 31.
Article in English, Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33386719

ABSTRACT

Euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (E/PAS) in the context of unbearable psychological or emotional suffering related to psychiatric disorders (psychiatric E/PAS) is ahighly debated topic. In Belgium and The Netherlands, the law allows for psychiatric E/PAS since 2002. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the Belgian and Dutch experiences and the questions raised during the last decade of real-life experiences with psychiatric E/PAS. We use the available national data on psychiatric E/PAS to present a quantitative overview of the current situation. In addition, we identified different challenges; i.e. ethical, medicalpsychiatric and legal, that increasingly impact and change the attitudes within the medical and psychiatric professional community towards psychiatric E/PAS.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary/ethics , Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Suicide, Assisted/ethics , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary/legislation & jurisprudence , Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary/psychology , Humans , Mental Disorders/psychology , Mentally Ill Persons , Netherlands , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Suicide, Assisted/psychology
14.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry ; 28(4): 466-477, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31537470

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of persons with dementia receiving euthanasia/assisted suicide (EAS) and how the practice is regulated in the Netherlands. DESIGNS: Qualitative directed content analysis of dementia EAS reports published by the Dutch euthanasia review committees between 2011 and October 5, 2018. RESULTS: Seventy-five cases were reviewed: 59 concurrent requests and 16 advance requests. Fifty-three percent (40/75) were women, and 48% (36/75) had Alzheimer disease. Advance request EAS patients were younger, had dementia longer, and more frequently had personal experience with dementia. Some concurrent request EAS patients were quite impaired: 15% (9/59) were deemed incompetent by at least one physician; in 24% (14/59), patients' previous statements or current body language were used to assess competence. In 39% (29/75), patients' own physicians declined to perform EAS; in 43% (32/75), the physician performing EAS was new to them. Physicians disagreed about patients' eligibility in 21% (16/75). All advance request and 14 (25%) concurrent request patients had an advance euthanasia directive but the conditions of applicability often lacked specificity. In 5 of 16 advance request EAS and 2 of 56 concurrent request EAS cases, EAS procedure was modified (e.g., premedication). Twenty-five percent (4/16) of advance request cases did not meet legal due care criteria, in particular the "unbearable suffering" criterion. CONCLUSIONS: Advance and concurrent request EAS cases differ in age, duration of illness, and past experience. Advance request EAS cases were complicated by ambiguous directives, patients being unaware of the EAS procedure, and physicians' difficulty assessing "unbearable suffering." Notably, some concurrent request patients were quite impaired yet deemed competent by appeals to previous statements.


Subject(s)
Dementia/therapy , Euthanasia/statistics & numerical data , Mental Competency , Physicians/psychology , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chronic Disease , Decision Making , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Government Regulation , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Standard of Care , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data
15.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care ; 37(1): 58-64, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31256607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In June 2016, the Government of Canada passed Bill C-14 decriminalizing medically assisted death. Increasing numbers of Canadians are accessing medical assistance in dying (MAiD) each year, but there is limited information about this population. OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristic outcomes of MAiD requests in a cohort of patients at an academic tertiary care center in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients making a formal request for a MAiD eligibility assessment from July 16 to September 18. Data extracted included demographics, diagnosis, psychosocial characteristics, information relating to the MAiD request, and clinical outcome. RESULTS: We received 107 formal requests for MAiD assessment. Ninety-seven patients were found eligible, of whom 80 received MAiD. Cancer was the primary diagnosis for 78% and median age was 74 years. The majority of patients (64%) cited "functional decline or inability to participate in meaningful activities" as the main factor motivating their request for MAiD. Half of patients who received MAiD (46%) described their request as consistent with a long-standing, philosophical view predating their illness. The 10-day reflection period was reduced for 39% of provisions due to impending loss of capacity. Our cohort was very similar demographically to those described both nationally and internationally. CONCLUSION: Patients seeking MAiD at our institution were similar to those described in other jurisdictions where assisted dying is legal and represent a group for whom autonomy and independence is critical. We noted a very high rate of risk of loss of capacity, suggesting a need for both earlier assessments and regular monitoring.


Subject(s)
Physical Functional Performance , Social Participation , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ontario , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Sex Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Suicide, Assisted/psychology , Tertiary Care Centers
16.
Psychol Med ; 50(4): 575-582, 2020 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30829194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Euthanasia or assisted suicide (EAS) for psychiatric disorders, legal in some countries, remains controversial. Personality disorders are common in psychiatric EAS. They often cause a sense of irremediable suffering and engender complex patient-clinician interactions, both of which could complicate EAS evaluations. METHODS: We conducted a directed-content analysis of all psychiatric EAS cases involving personality and related disorders published by the Dutch regional euthanasia review committees (N = 74, from 2011 to October 2017). RESULTS: Most patients were women (76%, n = 52), often with long, complex clinical histories: 62% had physical comorbidities, 97% had at least one, and 70% had two or more psychiatric comorbidities. They often had a history of suicide attempts (47%), self-harming behavior (27%), and trauma (36%). In 46%, a previous EAS request had been refused. Past psychiatric treatments varied: e.g. hospitalization and psychotherapy were not tried in 27% and 28%, respectively. In 50%, the physician managing their EAS were new to them, a third (36%) did not have a treating psychiatrist at the time of EAS request, and most physicians performing EAS were non-psychiatrists (70%) relying on cross-sectional psychiatric evaluations focusing on EAS eligibility, not treatment. Physicians evaluating such patients appear to be especially emotionally affected compared with when personality disorders are not present. CONCLUSIONS: The EAS evaluation of persons with personality disorders may be challenging and emotionally complex for their evaluators who are often non-psychiatrists. These factors could influence the interpretation of EAS requirements of irremediability, raising issues that merit further discussion and research.


Subject(s)
Euthanasia/statistics & numerical data , Personality Disorders/epidemiology , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Psychological Trauma/epidemiology , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Young Adult
17.
Fam Pract ; 37(2): 269-275, 2020 03 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31677267

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Euthanasia and assisted suicide laws in the Netherlands require physicians meet clinical guidelines when performing the practice to ensure death is peaceful and painless. Despite oversight by the regional review committees over each case, little research exists into the frequency of guideline deviation and the reasons for nonadherence. METHODS: Cases reported and reviewed between 2012 and 2017 that did not meet due medical care were analysed for thematic content. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 Dutch physicians on their experience with the clinical and pharmacological elements of euthanasia and assisted suicide, their interaction and comportment with the recommended guidelines, and reasons why guideline deviation might occur. Reported case reviews and interviews were used to obtain themes and subthemes to understand how and why deviations from clinical guidelines happened. RESULTS: Violations of due medical care were found in 42 (0.07%) of reported cases. The regional review committees found physicians in violation of due medical care mostly for inadequate confirmation of coma-induction and deviations from recommended drug dosages. Physicians reported that they rarely deviated from the guidelines, with the most common reasons being concern for the patient's family, concern over the drug efficacy, mistrust in the provided guidelines, or relying on the poor advice of pharmacists or hospital administrators. CONCLUSIONS: Deviations from the guidelines and violations of due medical care are rare, but should nonetheless be monitored and prevented. A few areas for improvement include skills training for physicians, consistency between review committee rulings, and further clarity on dosage recommendations.


Subject(s)
Euthanasia/legislation & jurisprudence , Guideline Adherence , Physicians/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Decision Making , Education, Medical , Euthanasia/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Netherlands , Physician-Patient Relations , Physicians/legislation & jurisprudence , Qualitative Research , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data
19.
BMJ Open ; 9(10): e028868, 2019 10 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31666261

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate Australian pharmacists' views about their role in physician-assisted suicide (PAS), their ethical and legal concerns and overall thoughts about PAS in pharmacy. DESIGN: Semistructured interviews of pharmacists incorporating a previously validated vignette and thematic analysis. SETTING: Australia (face to face or phone call). PARTICIPANTS: 40 Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency registered pharmacists, majority women (65%) with varied experiences in community, hospital, industry, academia, government and other fields. RESULTS: Emergent themes from the interviews were: legal and logistical framework, ethical framework, training and guidance and healthcare budget. More than half the participants supported the role of pharmacists in the supply of medicines for PAS, while less than half were either against or unsure of the legislation of PAS in Australia. Shared concerns included transparency of prescribing practices and identification of authorised physicians involved in PAS, which were consistent with existing literature. Religious faith, emotion and professional autonomy were key indicators for the implementation of conscientious objection to the supply of medicines in PAS. Re-evaluation of current guidelines, pharmacist training and government reimbursement was also of significance from participants' perspectives. CONCLUSION: This study revealed current concerns of practising pharmacists in Australia, including previously undocumented perspectives on the pharmacoeconomic impact of and barriers relating to PAS. The need for training of all healthcare professionals involved, the provision of clear guidelines, including regulation around storage, administration and disposal of medicines dispensed for PAS and the updating of current therapeutic guidelines around end-of-life care were all issues delineated by this study. These findings highlighted the need for current and future policies to account for all stakeholders involved in PAS, not solely prescribers.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Ethics, Pharmacy , Health Personnel/education , Pharmacists/psychology , Suicide, Assisted/legislation & jurisprudence , Australia , Drug Prescriptions/standards , Female , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Physician's Role , Religion , Social Responsibility , Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data
20.
Dtsch Arztebl Int ; 116(33-34): 545-552, 2019 08 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31554543

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this research project, part of a program initiated by the Swiss Federal Council, was to trace the development of organized assisted suicide in Switzerland, starting from the very first case in 1985. METHODS: Retrospective data on 3666 death records from Swiss institutes of foren- sic medicine for the years 1985 to 2014 were systematically compiled, read into a database, and for the most part quantitatively evaluated. RESULTS: Alongside a marked increase in the overall number of assisted suicides since the turn of the century, the number of people traveling to Switzerland from other countries-predominantly Germany-for this purpose has risen steadily. The proportion of women was 60%, and the age at death ranged from 18 to 105 years (median 73). The largest diagnostic category was malignancy overall, neurological disease for those from other countries. The next largest category was age-related functional limitation, e.g., sensory impairment (loss of sight and hearing), the conse- quences of which were stated in writing as the reason for the wish to die. Following the Swiss Federal Court's promulgation of binding requirements in 2006, the docu- mentation contained in the death records for the subsequent period up to 2014 is much more detailed, but still not uniform or even necessarily complete. CONCLUSION: The number of candidates for organized assisted suicide increased steadily during the study period, but no standard procedures were followed. The question therefore arises of whether further regulation or the introduction of a cen- tral registration office to maximize standardization and promote transparency would lead to improved quality assurance.


Subject(s)
Suicide, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Academies and Institutes , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Death Certificates , Female , Forensic Medicine , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Switzerland , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...