Sulfonylurea receptor 1 expression is variable in adult and pediatric brain tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Edema is a significant cause of neuromorbidity in children and adults with brain tumors. Agents used to control this effect, such as corticosteroids, have their own associated morbidities. Sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) is a transmembrane protein that regulates the activity of ion channels in neurons, glia, and endothelial cells. SUR1 expression is upregulated in neuroinflammatory conditions. Inhibition of SUR1 with glyburide decreases edema and neuroinflammation by countering cytotoxic edema and apoptosis in rodent models of subarachnoid hemorrhage, stroke, trauma, and cerebral metastases. However, the expression of SUR1 in human brain tumors has not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to determine SUR1 expression and cellular colocalization in a variety of human brain tumor specimens. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six glioblastoma, 12 cerebral metastases, 11 medulloblastoma, 9 supratentorial ependymoma, and 8 posterior fossa ependymoma specimens were analyzed using immunofluorescence. SUR1 expression and colocalization with blood vessels, neurons, and glial cells was analyzed and compared using ANOVA. RESULTS: SUR1 expression was found in all specimens examined as a percentage of the total tissue area (mean ± SD): glioblastoma 3.9 ± 4, cerebral metastases 4.1 ± 3.1, medulloblastoma 8.2 ± 7.2, supratentorial ependymoma 9.1 ± 7, and posterior fossa ependymoma 8.1 ± 5.9. SUR1 expression was greater in supratentorial ependymoma compared to glioblastoma and metastases (p < 0.05) and greater in medulloblastoma compared to glioblastoma (p < 0.05). SUR1 colocalized most reliably with the neuronal marker, NeuN, in glioblastoma, metastases, and posterior fossa ependymoma samples (p < 0.05). SUR1 colocalized most reliably with the endothelial cell marker, CD31, in medulloblastoma samples (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: SUR1 is a putative therapeutic target to reduce neuroinflammation in adult and pediatric brain tumors. Inhibition of SUR1 may result in neuronal stabilization in glioblastoma, cerebral metastases, and posterior fossa ependymoma and reduced edema in medulloblastoma.
.

Mithramycin A Improves Functional Recovery by Inhibiting BSCB Disruption and Hemorrhage after Spinal Cord Injury.

After spinal cord injury (SCI), blood-spinal cord barrier (BSCB) disruption and progressive hemorrhage lead to secondary injury, subsequent apoptosis and/or necrosis of neurons and glia, causing permanent neurological deficits. Growing evidence indicates that mithramycin A (MA), an anti-cancer drug, has neuroprotective effects in ischemic brain injury and Huntington's disease (HD). However, the precise mechanism underlying its protective effects is largely unknown. Here, we examined the effect of MA on BSCB breakdown and hemorrhage as well as subsequent inflammation after SCI. After moderate spinal cord contusion injury at T9, MA (150 µg/kg) was immediately injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) and further injected once a day for 5 days. Our data show that MA attenuated BSCB disruption and hemorrhage, and inhibited the infiltration of neutrophils and macrophages after SCI. Consistent with these findings, the expression of inflammatory mediators was significantly alleviated by MA. MA also inhibited the expression and activation of matrix metalloprotease-9 (MMP-9) after injury, which is known to disrupt BSCB and the degradation of tight junction (TJ) proteins. In addition, the expression of sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) and transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (TRPM4), which are known to mediate hemorrhage at an early stage after SCI, was significantly blocked by MA treatment. Finally, MA inhibited apoptotic cell death and improved functional recovery after injury. Thus, our results demonstrated that MA improves functional recovery by attenuating BSCB disruption and hemorrhage through the downregulation of SUR1/TRPM4 and MMP-9 after SCI.

Salutary effects of glibenclamide during the chronic phase of murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.

BACKGROUND: In multiple sclerosis (MS) and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), inflammation is perpetuated by both infiltrating leukocytes and astrocytes. Recent work implicated SUR1-TRPM4 channels, expressed mostly by astrocytes, in murine EAE. We tested the hypothesis that pharmacological inhibition of SUR1 during the chronic phase of EAE would be beneficial. METHODS: EAE was induced in mice using myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) 35-55. Glibenclamide (10 µg/day) was administered beginning 12 or 24 days later. The effects of treatment were determined by clinical scoring and tissue examination. Drug within EAE lesions was identified using bodipy-glibenclamide. The role of SUR1-TRPM4 in primary astrocytes was characterized using patch clamp and qPCR. Demyelinating lesions from MS patients were studied by immunolabeling and immunoFRET. RESULTS: Administering glibenclamide beginning 24 days after MOG35-55 immunization, well after clinical symptoms had plateaued, improved clinical scores, reduced myelin loss, inflammation (CD45, CD20, CD3, p65), and reactive astrocytosis, improved macrophage phenotype (CD163), and decreased expression of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), B-cell activating factor (BAFF), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2) and nitric oxide synthase 2 (NOS2) in lumbar spinal cord white matter. Glibenclamide accumulated within EAE lesions, and had no effect on leukocyte sequestration. In primary astrocyte cultures, activation by TNF plus IFNγ induced de novo expression of SUR1-TRPM4 channels and upregulated Tnf, Baff, Ccl2, and Nos2 mRNA, with glibenclamide blockade of SUR1-TRPM4 reducing these mRNA increases. In demyelinating lesions from MS patients, astrocytes co-expressed SUR1-TRPM4 and BAFF, CCL2, and NOS2. CONCLUSIONS: SUR1-TRPM4 may be a druggable target for disease modification in MS.

ABC gene expression profiles have clinical importance and possibly form a new hallmark of cancer.

Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette proteins constitute a large family of active transporters through extracellular and intracellular membranes. Increased drug efflux based on adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette protein activity is related to the development of cancer cell chemoresistance. Several articles have focused on adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette gene expression profiles (signatures), based on the expression of all 49 human adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette genes, in individual tumor types and reported connections to established clinicopathological features. The aim of this study was to test our theory about the existence of adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette gene expression profiles common to multiple types of tumors, which may modify tumor progression and provide clinically relevant information. Such general adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette profiles could constitute a new attribute of carcinogenesis. Our combined cohort consisted of tissues from 151 cancer patients-breast, colorectal, and pancreatic carcinomas. Standard protocols for RNA isolation and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction were followed. Gene expression data from individual tumor types as well as a merged tumor dataset were analyzed by bioinformatics tools. Several general adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette profiles, with differences in gene functions, were established and shown to have significant relations to clinicopathological features such as tumor size, histological grade, or clinical stage. Genes ABCC7, A3, A8, A12, and C8 prevailed among the most upregulated or downregulated ones. In conclusion, the results supported our theory about general adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette gene expression profiles and their importance for cancer on clinical as well as research levels. The presence of ABCC7 (official symbol CFTR) among the genes with key roles in the profiles supports the emerging evidence about its crucial role in various cancers. Graphical abstract.

What's next after metformin? Focus on sulphonylurea: add-on or combination therapy / Qué viene después de la metformina? Foco en sulfonilureas: adicionar o tratamiento en combinación

Introduction: The pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) mainly focused on insulin resistance and insulin deficiency over the past decades. Currently, the pathophysiologies expanded to ominous octet and guidelines were updated with newer generation of antidiabetic drug classes. However, many patients had yet to achieve their target glycaemic control. Although all the guidelines suggested metformin as first line, there was no definite consensus on the second line drug agents as variety of drug classes were recommended. Objectives: The aim of this review was to evaluate the drug class after metformin especially sulphonylurea and issues around add-on or fixed dose combination therapy. Methods: Extensive literature search for English language articles, clinical practice guidelines and references was performed using electronic databases. Results: Adding sulphonylurea to metformin targeted both insulin resistance and insulin deficiency. Sulphonylurea was efficacious and cheaper than thiazolidinedione, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue and insulin. The main side effect of sulphonylurea was hypoglycaemia but there was no effect on the body weight when combining with metformin. Fixed dose sulphonylurea/metformin was more efficacious at lower dose and reported to have fewer side effects with better adherence. Furthermore, fixed dose combination was cheaper than add-on therapy. In conclusion, sulphonylurea was feasible as the second line agent after metformin as the combination targeted on two pathways, efficacious, cost-effective and had long safety history. Fixed dose combination tablet could improve patient’s adherence and offered an inexpensive and more efficacious option regardless of original or generic product as compared to add-on therapy (AU)

Introducción: La fisiopatología de la diabetes tipo 2 (T2DM) se centró en las pasadas décadas principalmente en la resistencia a la insulina y al déficit de insulina. Actualmente, la fisiopatología se ha expandido hacia el octeto ominoso y se actualizaron las guías con las nuevas generaciones de clases terapéuticas de antidiabéticos. Sin embargo, muchos pacientes aún tienen que alcanzar sus objetivos terapéuticos de control de glucemia. Aunque todas las guías sugieren a la metformina como primera línea, no hay un consenso establecido sobre los agentes de segunda línea, ya que se recomiendan una gran variedad de clases terapéuticas. Objetivos: El objetivo de esta revisión fue evaluar las clases terapéuticas después de la metformina, especialmente la sulfonilureas, y los problemas asociados a la adición o a los tratamientos con combinaciones en dosis fija. Método: Serealizó una búsqueda extensiva de artículos en inglés, guías de práctica clínica y referencias utilizando bases de datos electrónicas. Resultados: Añadir sulfonilurea a la metformina tiene como objetivo tanto la resistencia a la insulina como el déficit de insulina. La sulfonilurea fue eficaz y más barata que la tiazolidindiona, inhibidores de la dipeptidil peptidasa-4, análogos del péptido de tipo glucagón e insulina. El principal efecto adverso de las sulfonilureas fue la hipoglucemia, pero no hubo efectos en el peso corporal cuando se combinaba con metformina. La combinación de sulfonilurea/metformina era más eficaz a baja dosis y reportó menos efectos adversos con mejor adherencia. Además, la combinación a dosis fija era más barata que el tratamiento en asociación. En conclusión, la sulfonilurea es factible como tratamiento de segunda línea después de la metformina como tratamiento de combinación en las dos líneas de tratamiento, eficaz, coste-efectivo, y tienen una historia de seguridad mayor. Los comprimidos con combinaciones a dosis fija podría mejorar la adherencia del paciente y ofrecer una opción barata y más eficaz, independientemente de que fuese genérico u original, en comparación con el tratamiento en asociación (AU)

Sur1-Trpm4 Cation Channel Expression in Human Cerebral Infarcts.

The nonselective monovalent cation channel transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (Trpm4) is transcriptionally upregulated in neural and vascular cells in animal models of brain infarction. It associates with sulfonylurea receptor 1 (Sur1) to form Sur1-Trpm4 channels, which have critical roles in cytotoxic edema, cell death, blood-brain barrier breakdown, and vasogenic edema. We examined Trpm4 expression in postmortem brain specimens from 15 patients who died within the first 31 days of the onset of focal cerebral ischemia. We found increased Trpm4 protein expression in all cases using immunohistochemistry; transcriptional upregulation was confirmed using in situ hybridization of Trpm4 messenger RNA. Transient receptor potential melastatin 4 colocalized and coassociated with Sur1 within ischemic endothelial cells and neurons. Coexpression of Sur1 and Trpm4 in necrotic endothelial cells was also associated with vasogenic edema indicated by upregulated perivascular tumor necrosis factor, extravasation of serum immunoglobulin G, and associated inflammation. Upregulated Trpm4 protein was present up to 1 month after the onset of cerebral ischemia. In a rat model of middle cerebral artery occlusion stroke, pharmacologic channel blockade by glibenclamide, a selective inhibitor of sulfonylurea receptor, mitigated perivascular tumor necrosis factor labeling. Thus, upregulated Sur1-Trpm4 channels and associated blood-brain barrier disruption and cerebral edema suggest that pharmacologic targeting of this channel may represent a promising therapeutic strategy for the clinical management of patients with cerebral ischemia.