Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.304
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 19(6): e0304782, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38833447

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Pathological angiogenesis and vascular instability are observed in diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular edema (DME), and wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD). Many receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs) contribute to angiogenesis, whereas the RTK TIE2 is important for vascular stability. Pan-VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as vorolanib, sunitinib, and axitinib are of therapeutic interest over current antibody treatments that target only one or two ligands. This study compared the anti-angiogenic potential of these TKIs. METHODS: A kinase HotSpot™ assay was conducted to identify TKIs inhibiting RTKs associated with angiogenesis and vascular stability. Half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) for VEGFRs and TIE2 was determined for each TKI. In vitro angiogenesis inhibition was investigated using a human umbilical vein endothelial cell sprouting assay, and in vivo angiogenesis was studied using the chorioallantoic membrane assay. Melanin binding was assessed using a melanin-binding assay. Computer modeling was conducted to understand the TIE2-axitinib complex as well as interactions between vorolanib and VEGFRs. RESULTS: Vorolanib, sunitinib, and axitinib inhibited RTKs of interest in angiogenesis and exhibited pan-VEGFR inhibition. HotSpot™ assay and TIE2 IC50 values showed that only axitinib potently inhibited TIE2 (up to 89%). All three TKIs effectively inhibited angiogenesis in vitro. In vivo, TKIs were more effective at inhibiting VEGF-induced angiogenesis than the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab. Of the three TKIs, only sunitinib bound melanin. TKIs differ in their classification and binding to VEGFRs, which is important because type II inhibitors have greater selectivity than type I TKIs. CONCLUSIONS: Vorolanib, sunitinib, and axitinib exhibited pan-VEGFR inhibition and inhibited RTKs associated with pathological angiogenesis. Of the three TKIs, only axitinib potently inhibited TIE2 which is an undesired trait as TIE2 is essential for vascular stability. The findings support the use of vorolanib for therapeutic inhibition of angiogenesis observed in DR, DME, and wAMD.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Axitinib , Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells , Imidazoles , Indazoles , Indoles , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Pyrroles , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor , Sunitinib , Axitinib/pharmacology , Humans , Sunitinib/pharmacology , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/pharmacology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Pyrroles/pharmacology , Indoles/pharmacology , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor/metabolism , Indazoles/pharmacology , Animals , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Receptor, TIE-2/metabolism , Receptor, TIE-2/antagonists & inhibitors , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Neovascularization, Pathologic/metabolism
2.
J Cell Mol Med ; 28(9): e18329, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693863

ABSTRACT

Therapy failure with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sunitinib remains a great challenge in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Growing evidence indicates that the tumour subpopulation can enter a transient, non-mutagenic drug-tolerant state to endure the treatment underlying the minimal residual disease and tumour relapse. Drug tolerance to sunitinib remains largely unexplored in RCC. Here, we show that sunitinib-tolerant 786-O/S and Caki-2/S cells are induced by prolonged drug treatment showing reduced drug sensitivity, enhanced clonogenicity, and DNA synthesis. Sunitinib-tolerance developed via dynamic processes, including (i) engagement of c-MET and AXL pathways, (ii) alteration of stress-induced p38 kinase and pro-survival BCL-2 signalling, (iii) extensive actin remodelling, which was correlated with activation of focal adhesion proteins. Remarkably, the acute drug response in both sensitive and sunitinib-tolerant cell lines led to dramatic fine-tuning of the actin-cytoskeleton and boosted cellular migration and invasion, indicating that the drug-response might depend on cell state transition rather than pre-existing mutations. The drug-tolerant state was transiently acquired, as the cells resumed initial drug sensitivity after >10 passages under drug withdrawal, reinforcing the concept of dynamic regulation and phenotypic heterogeneity. Our study described molecular events contributing to the reversible switch into sunitinib-tolerance, providing possible novel therapeutic opportunities in RCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Cell Movement , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Kidney Neoplasms , Sunitinib , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/metabolism , Sunitinib/pharmacology , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Cell Movement/drug effects , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/metabolism , Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2/genetics , Axl Receptor Tyrosine Kinase , Pyrroles/pharmacology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/metabolism , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Indoles/pharmacology
3.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 650, 2024 May 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802739

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the effect of CD276 expression on the sunitinib sensitivity of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) cell and animal models and the potential mechanisms involved. METHODS: CD276 expression levels of ccRCC and normal samples were analyzed via online databases and real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). CD276 was knocked down in ccRCC cell models (sunitinib-resistant 786-O/R cells and sunitinib-sensitive 786-O cells) using shRNA transfection, and the cells were exposed to a sunitinib (2 µM) environment. Cells proliferation was then analyzed using MTT assay and colony formation experiment. Alkaline comet assay, immunofluorescent staining, and western blot experiments were conducted to assess the DNA damage repair ability of the cells. Western blot was also used to observe the activation of FAK-MAPK pathway within the cells. Finally, a nude mouse xenograft model was established and the nude mice were orally administered sunitinib (40 mg/kg/d) to evaluate the in vivo effects of CD276 knockdown on the therapeutic efficacy of sunitinib against ccRCC. RESULTS: CD276 was significantly upregulated in both ccRCC clinical tissue samples and cell models. In vitro experiments showed that knocking down CD276 reduced the survival rate, IC50 value, and colony-forming ability of ccRCC cells. Knocking down CD276 increased the comet tail moment (TM) values and γH2AX foci number, and reduced BRCA1 and RAD51 protein levels. Knocking down CD276 also decreased the levels of p-FAK, p-MEK, and p-ERK proteins. CONCLUSION: Knocking down CD276 effectively improved the sensitivity of ccRCC cell and animal models to sunitinib treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , DNA Damage , DNA Repair , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Kidney Neoplasms , Mice, Nude , Sunitinib , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/metabolism , Humans , Sunitinib/pharmacology , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Animals , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism , Mice , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , DNA Damage/drug effects , MAP Kinase Signaling System/drug effects , Focal Adhesion Kinase 1/metabolism , Focal Adhesion Kinase 1/genetics , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Gene Knockdown Techniques , Male , B7 Antigens
4.
Eur J Cancer ; 204: 114089, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703618

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The development of reliable biomarkers for the prediction of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) response in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and urothelial carcinoma (mUC) remains an unresolved challenge. Conventional ICI biomarkers typically focus on tumor-related factors such as PD-L1 expression. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the predictive value of serum electrolyte levels, a so far widely unexplored area, is still pending. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of baseline sodium, potassium, chloride, magnesium and calcium levels in two independent phase 3 clinical trials: IMvigor211 for mUC comparing atezolizumab to chemotherapy, and IMmotion151 for mRCC comparing atezolizumab+bevacizumab to sunitinib. This analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive value of these electrolyte levels in these clinical settings. A total of 1787 patients (IMvigor211 n = 901; IMmotion151 n = 886) were analyzed. RESULTS: We found a linear correlation of baseline serum sodium and chloride with prognosis across both trials, which was not found for potassium, magnesium and calcium. In multivariate analysis, the prognostic capacity of sodium was limited to patients receiving ICI as compared to the control group. Interestingly, in both studies, the chance of achieving an objective response was highest in the patient subgroup with high baseline serum sodium levels of > 140 mmol/L (IMmotion151: Complete response in 17.9% versus 2.0% in patients with mRCC with baseline sodium < 135 mmol/L). Serum sodium outperformed tumor PD-L1 expression as a predictor for immunotherapy efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients exhibiting elevated serum sodium levels derive the greatest benefit from immunotherapy, suggesting that baseline serum concentration could serve as a valuable and cost-effective predictive biomarker for immunotherapy across entities.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Sodium , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/blood , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/immunology , Male , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/blood , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/immunology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Female , Sodium/blood , Aged , Middle Aged , Immunotherapy/methods , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/blood , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/secondary , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/immunology
5.
Cancer Treat Rev ; 127: 102745, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723394

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The average five-year survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) is 71%. However, there is significant variability in patient prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been introduced into the treatment landscape of mRCC. This meta-analysis aimed to estimate progression-free and overall survival probabilities and identify possible outcome predictors of mRCC patients treated with ICI combination as first-line treatment. METHODS: Studies comparing the combination of ICI combinations versus standard of therapy for first-line treatment of advanced renal-cell carcinoma were searched in MEDLINE, CANCERLIT, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, and the Cochrane Library from inception through September 2023. Data on patient populations and outcomes were extracted from each study by three independent observers and combined using the DerSimonian and Laird methods. RESULTS: Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Globally, 5121 patients were included in this meta-analysis: 2556 patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and 2565 with sunitinib as control. The ICI combination was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.68; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.56-0.81, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, ICI combination was also associated with OS improvement (HR 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.78-0.92, p = 0.001). There is no statistical increase in adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that PFS and OS are statistically increased in mRCC with ICI combination treatment by 32% and 15%, respectively.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Kidney Neoplasms , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Sunitinib/therapeutic use
6.
Anticancer Res ; 44(6): 2377-2392, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821582

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/AIM: Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is characterized by early metastasis, clinical resistance and poor prognosis. Recently, we showed that aggressive OSCC cells co-express endothelial cell markers and can form tube-like structures, known as vasculogenic mimicry (VM), a process associated with poor prognosis in head and neck cancers. Given the limited success of current antiangiogenic therapy in treating OSCC, this study sought to explore the efficiency of these drugs in targeting an ex vivo model of VM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: OSCC cell lines from the tongue and floor of the mouth in addition to human endothelial cells were used. The treatments comprised a set of clinically relevant antiangiogenic drugs: sorafenib, sunitinib, and axitinib, which were administered in different doses. Multiple ex vivo approaches including cell tubulogenesis, proliferation, apoptosis, and migration assays were used. RESULTS: Although these drugs inhibited the formation of endothelial cell capillaries, they showed clear differential effects on OSCC cell-derived VM and cell morphology. Sorafenib inhibited the tubulogenesis of aggressive OSCC cells compared with the limited effect of sunitinib and axitinib. Furthermore, our data consistently demonstrated a preferential efficacy of certain drugs over others. Sorafenib and sunitinib exhibited anti-cancer effects on tumor cell proliferation, apoptosis, and cell migration, compared with the limited effect of axitinib. CONCLUSION: The antiangiogenic drugs, except sorafenib, had limited effect on VM formation in vitro and exhibited varying anti-cancer effects on OSCC cells. These data support the notion that VM formation may in part explain the development of drug resistance in OSCC cells.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Axitinib , Cell Movement , Cell Proliferation , Mouth Neoplasms , Neovascularization, Pathologic , Sorafenib , Sunitinib , Humans , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/pharmacology , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Mouth Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mouth Neoplasms/pathology , Mouth Neoplasms/blood supply , Mouth Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Neovascularization, Pathologic/drug therapy , Neovascularization, Pathologic/pathology , Sorafenib/pharmacology , Sorafenib/therapeutic use , Sunitinib/pharmacology , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Cell Movement/drug effects , Axitinib/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/blood supply , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/metabolism , Endothelial Cells/drug effects , Endothelial Cells/pathology , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Phenylurea Compounds/pharmacology , Phenylurea Compounds/therapeutic use , Niacinamide/analogs & derivatives , Niacinamide/pharmacology , Niacinamide/therapeutic use
7.
Biochem Pharmacol ; 224: 116247, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697311

ABSTRACT

Current therapeutic options for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are very limited, which is largely due to inadequate comprehension of molecular pathological mechanisms as well as RCC's resistance to chemotherapy. Dual-specificity phosphatase 6 (DUSP6) has been associated with numerous human diseases. However, its role in RCC is not well understood. Here, we show that diminished DUSP6 expression is linked to RCC progression and unfavorable prognosis. Mechanistically, DUSP6 serves as a tumor suppressor in RCC by intervening the TAF10 and BSCL2 via the ERK-AKT pathway. Further, DUSP6 is also transcriptionally regulated by HNF-4a. Moreover, docking experiments have indicated that DUSP6 expression is enhanced when bound by Calcium saccharate, which also inhibits RCC cell proliferation, metabolic rewiring, and sunitinib resistance. In conclusion, our study identifies Calcium saccharate as a prospective pharmacological therapeutic approach for RCC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Dual Specificity Phosphatase 6 , Glycolysis , Kidney Neoplasms , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt , Sunitinib , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/metabolism , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Sunitinib/pharmacology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/metabolism , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Glycolysis/drug effects , Glycolysis/physiology , Cell Line, Tumor , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-akt/metabolism , Animals , Dual Specificity Phosphatase 6/metabolism , Dual Specificity Phosphatase 6/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Mice , Mice, Nude , MAP Kinase Signaling System/drug effects , MAP Kinase Signaling System/physiology , Male
8.
PLoS Comput Biol ; 20(5): e1012088, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701089

ABSTRACT

Clinical trials involving systemic neoadjuvant treatments in breast cancer aim to shrink tumors before surgery while simultaneously allowing for controlled evaluation of biomarkers, toxicity, and suppression of distant (occult) metastatic disease. Yet neoadjuvant clinical trials are rarely preceded by preclinical testing involving neoadjuvant treatment, surgery, and post-surgery monitoring of the disease. Here we used a mouse model of spontaneous metastasis occurring after surgical removal of orthotopically implanted primary tumors to develop a predictive mathematical model of neoadjuvant treatment response to sunitinib, a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (RTKI). Treatment outcomes were used to validate a novel mathematical kinetics-pharmacodynamics model predictive of perioperative disease progression. Longitudinal measurements of presurgical primary tumor size and postsurgical metastatic burden were compiled using 128 mice receiving variable neoadjuvant treatment doses and schedules (released publicly at https://zenodo.org/records/10607753). A non-linear mixed-effects modeling approach quantified inter-animal variabilities in metastatic dynamics and survival, and machine-learning algorithms were applied to investigate the significance of several biomarkers at resection as predictors of individual kinetics. Biomarkers included circulating tumor- and immune-based cells (circulating tumor cells and myeloid-derived suppressor cells) as well as immunohistochemical tumor proteins (CD31 and Ki67). Our computational simulations show that neoadjuvant RTKI treatment inhibits primary tumor growth but has little efficacy in preventing (micro)-metastatic disease progression after surgery and treatment cessation. Machine learning algorithms that included support vector machines, random forests, and artificial neural networks, confirmed a lack of definitive biomarkers, which shows the value of preclinical modeling studies to identify potential failures that should be avoided clinically.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Machine Learning , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Animals , Female , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Mice , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Sunitinib/pharmacology , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Computational Biology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Models, Biological
9.
Eur J Med Res ; 29(1): 236, 2024 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38622715

ABSTRACT

Glycolysis-related metabolic reprogramming is a central hallmark of human cancers, especially in renal cell carcinoma. However, the regulatory function of glycolytic signature in papillary RCC has not been well elucidated. In the present study, the glycolysis-immune predictive signature was constructed and validated using WGCNA, glycolysis-immune clustering analysis. PPI network of DEGs was constructed and visualized. Functional enrichments and patients' overall survival were analyzed. QRT-PCR experiments were performed to detect hub genes' expression and distribution, siRNA technology was used to silence targeted genes; cell proliferation and migration assays were applied to evaluate the biological function. Glucose concentration, lactate secretion, and ATP production were measured. Glycolysis-Immune Related Prognostic Index (GIRPI) was constructed and combined analyzed with single-cell RNA-seq. High-GIRPI signature predicted significantly poorer outcomes and relevant clinical features of pRCC patients. Moreover, GIRPI also participated in several pathways, which affected tumor immune microenvironment and provided potential therapeutic strategy. As a key glycolysis regulator, PFKFB3 could promote renal cancer cell proliferation and migration in vitro. Blocking of PFKFB3 by selective inhibitor PFK-015 or glycolytic inhibitor 2-DG significantly restrained renal cancer cells' neoplastic potential. PFK-015 and sunitinib could synergistically inhibit pRCC cells proliferation. Glycolysis-Immune Risk Signature is closely associated with pRCC prognosis, progression, immune infiltration, and therapeutic response. PFKFB3 may serve as a pivotal glycolysis regulator and mediates Sunitinib resistance in pRCC patients.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Sunitinib/pharmacology , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Multiomics , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Tumor Microenvironment , Phosphofructokinase-2/genetics , Phosphofructokinase-2/metabolism
11.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(4): e244898, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38568688

ABSTRACT

Importance: Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare cancer treated with the tyrosine kinase inhibitors imatinib mesylate or sunitinib malate. In general, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), access to these treatments is limited. Objective: To describe the demographic characteristics, treatment duration, and survival of patients with GIST in LMICs treated with imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective database cohort analysis included patients in 2 access programs administered by The Max Foundation: the Glivec International Patient Assistance Program (GIPAP), from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2016, and the Max Access Solutions (MAS) program, January 1, 2017, to October 12, 2020. Sixty-six countries in which The Max Foundation facilitates access to imatinib and sunitinib were included. Participants consisted of patients with approved indications for imatinib, including adjuvant therapy in high-risk GIST by pathologic evaluation of resected tumor or biopsy-proven unresectable or metastatic GIST. All patients were reported to have tumors positive for CD117(c-kit) by treating physicians. A total of 9866 patients received treatment for metastatic and/or unresectable disease; 2100 received adjuvant imatinib; 49 received imatinib from another source and were only included in the sunitinib analysis; and 53 received both imatinib and sunitinib through The Max Foundation programs. Data were analyzed from October 13, 2020, to January 30, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Demographic and clinical information was reported by treating physicians. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS). An imputation-based informed censoring model estimated events for patients lost to follow-up after treatment with adjuvant imatinib. Patients who were lost to follow-up with metastatic or unresectable disease were presumed deceased. Results: A total of 12 015 unique patients were included in the analysis (6890 male [57.6%]; median age, 54 [range, 0-100] years). Of these, 2100 patients were treated with imatinib in the adjuvant setting (median age, 54 [range 8-88] years) and 9866 were treated with imatinib for metastatic or unresectable disease (median age, 55 [range, 0-100] years). Male patients comprised 5867 of 9866 patients (59.5%) with metastatic or unresectable disease and 1023 of 2100 patients (48.7%) receiving adjuvant therapy. The median OS with imatinib for unresectable or metastatic disease was 5.8 (95% CI, 5.6-6.1) years, and the median TTD was 4.2 (95% CI, 4.1-4.4) years. The median OS with sunitinib for patients with metastatic or unresectable GIST was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-2.5) years; the median TTD was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.0-2.1) years. The 10-year OS rate in the adjuvant setting was 73.8% (95% CI, 67.2%-81.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with GIST who were predominantly from LMICs and received orally administered therapy through the GIPAP or MAS programs, outcomes were similar to those observed in high-resource countries. These findings underscore the feasibility and relevance of administering oral anticancer therapy to a molecularly defined population in LMICs, addressing a critical gap in cancer care.


Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors/drug therapy , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Developing Countries , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Retrospective Studies , Adjuvants, Immunologic
12.
Clin Nucl Med ; 49(5): e208-e210, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574256

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a leading cause of mortality among genitourinary malignancies with limited therapeutic options. The hematogenous route, lymphatic spread, and direct invasion have been documented in RCC. Usually, metastases are regional lymph nodes, lungs, bone, liver, adrenal glands, contralateral kidney, and brain. Metastases to the rare sites such as skin, breast, head and neck were documented in the literature. In the present case, we describe the synchronous metastases to the base of the tongue and thyroid gland in RCC and the response to sunitinib therapy on 18F-FDG PET/CT.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Thyroid Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Follow-Up Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Tongue/pathology
13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38636134

ABSTRACT

Herein, a simple, sensitive, and reliable dispersive solid phase extraction was reported for the efficient extraction of sunitinib from biological samples. To facilitate the extraction of the desired analyte from urine and plasma samples, magnetic MIL-101Cr (NH2) @SiO2 @ NiFe2O4 was synthesized by a hydrothermal method and applied as an effective sorbent during the extraction process. After adsorption of the drug using 10 mg of MIL-101Cr (NH2) @ SiO2 @ NiFe2O4 nanoparticles through vortexing (1 min), the sorbent was separatedfrom the sample solution using a magnet. To eluate the drug, the sorbent containing the sunitinib was contacted with 100 µL dimethylformamide. The eluent was analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Reasonable validation data consisting of low limits of detection (0.14, 0.35, and 0.70 ng mL-1 in deionized water, plasma, and urine) and quantification (0.48, 1.2, and 2.4 ng mL-1 in deionized water, plasma, and urine, respectively), a wide linear range of the calibration curve (0.48-200, 1.2-200, and 2.4-100 ng mL-1 in deionized water, plasma, and urine, respectively) good extraction recovery (76 %), and low relative standard deviations for inter- and intra-day precisions (6.9 %) were obtained by the method. Eventually, the proposed procedure was effectively implemented on both plasma and urine samples, yielding successful outcomes.


Subject(s)
Limit of Detection , Metal-Organic Frameworks , Solid Phase Extraction , Sunitinib , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods , Solid Phase Extraction/methods , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Sunitinib/blood , Sunitinib/urine , Sunitinib/analysis , Sunitinib/chemistry , Sunitinib/isolation & purification , Humans , Metal-Organic Frameworks/chemistry , Reproducibility of Results , Linear Models , Magnetite Nanoparticles/chemistry
14.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 132: 111963, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38560962

ABSTRACT

We aimed in this study to investigate the possible cardioprotective effects of sacubitril/valsartan against sunitinib-induced cardiac fibrosis (CF) and oxidative stress via targeting thioredoxin-interacting protein/thioredoxin (TXNIP/TRX) system and nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)/Wingless-related MMTV integration site (Wnt)/ß-catenin/Sex-determining region Y box 9 (SOX9) signaling. CF was induced in male Wistar albino rats by cumulative dose of sunitinib (300 mg/kg, given over 4 weeks as: 25 mg/kg orally, three times a week), which were co-treated with sacubitril/valsartan (68 mg/kg/day, orally) for four weeks. Significant elevation in blood pressure, cardiac inflammatory and fibrotic markers besides cardiac dysfunction were observed. These alterations were associated with disruption of TXNIP/TRX system, upregulation of NF-κB/Wnt/ß-catenin/SOX9 pathway along with marked increase in lysyl oxidase (LOX) and matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP-1) expressions and extensive deposition of collagen fibers in cardiac tissues. Luckily, sacubitril/valsartan was able to reverse all of the aforementioned detrimental effects in sunitinib-administered rats. These findings illustrate a potential role of sacubitril/valsartan in alleviating CF and oxidative stress induced by sunitinib via antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic properties. These remarkable effects of sacubitril/valsartan were mediated by its ability to improve TXNIP/TRX system and downregulate NF-κB/Wnt/ß-catenin/SOX9 signaling in addition to decreasing LOX and MMP-1 expressions in cardiac tissues. In summary, this study highlights sacubitril/valsartan as a potential therapeutic agent in mitigating CF and oxidative stress especially in cancer cases treated with sunitinib.


Subject(s)
Aminobutyrates , Biphenyl Compounds , Drug Combinations , Fibrosis , NF-kappa B , Oxidative Stress , Rats, Wistar , Sunitinib , Tetrazoles , Thioredoxins , Valsartan , Wnt Signaling Pathway , Animals , Valsartan/pharmacology , Valsartan/therapeutic use , Male , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Biphenyl Compounds/therapeutic use , Biphenyl Compounds/pharmacology , NF-kappa B/metabolism , Aminobutyrates/pharmacology , Aminobutyrates/therapeutic use , Rats , Tetrazoles/pharmacology , Tetrazoles/therapeutic use , Thioredoxins/metabolism , Wnt Signaling Pathway/drug effects , Carrier Proteins/metabolism , Down-Regulation/drug effects , Myocardium/pathology , Myocardium/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/genetics
15.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 47(5): 661-669, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609583

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Antiangiogenic agents have been used for many years as a first-line systemic treatment for advanced HCC. Embolization with cytostatic drugs on the other hand is the first-line treatment for intermediate HCC. The two types of drugs have not been combined for intraarterial delivery yet. The loading and release dynamics and the in vitro effect of their combination are tested in this experimental study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drug-eluting beads were loaded with doxorubicin, sunitinib and sunitinib analogue piperazine (SAP) alone and with their combinations. Diameter change, loading, release, and effect in cellular proliferation were assessed. RESULTS: The average microsphere diameter after loading was 473.7 µm (µm) for Doxorubicin, 388.4 µm for Sunitinib, 515.5 µm for SAP, 414.8 µm for the combination Doxorubicin/Sunitinib and 468.8 µm for the combination Doxorubicin /SAP. Drug release in 0.9% NaCl was 10% for Doxorubicin, 49% for Sunitinib, 25% for SAP, 20%/18% for the combination Doxorubicin/Sunitinib, and 18%/23% for the combination Doxorubicin/SAP whereas in human plasma it was 56%, 27%, 13%, 76%/63% and 62%/15%, respectively. The mean concentration of Doxorubicin that led to inhibition of 50% of cellular proliferation in an HCC Huh7 cell line was 163.1 nM (nM), for Sunitinib 10.3 micromolar (µΜ), for SAP 16.7 µΜ, for Doxorubicin/Sunitinib 222.4 nM and for Doxorubicin/SAP 275 nM. CONCLUSIONS: Doxorubicin may be combined with antiangiogenic drugs with satisfactory in vitro loading and release outcomes and effect on cellular lines.


Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Doxorubicin , Indoles , Liver Neoplasms , Sunitinib , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/pharmacology , Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Humans , Microspheres , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Pyrroles/administration & dosage , Piperazines/therapeutic use , Cell Line, Tumor , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/methods , In Vitro Techniques , Drug Liberation
16.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(4): 183, 2024 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594593

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate. Management has drastically changed with the new era of immunotherapy, and novel strategies are being developed; however, identifying systemic treatments is still challenging. This paper presents an update of the expert panel consensus from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group on advanced renal cell carcinoma management in Brazil. METHODS: A panel of 34 oncologists and experts in renal cell carcinoma discussed and voted on the best options for managing advanced disease in Brazil, including systemic treatment of early and metastatic renal cell carcinoma as well as nonclear cell tumours. The results were compared with the literature and graded according to the level of evidence. RESULTS: Adjuvant treatments benefit patients with a high risk of recurrence after surgery, and the agents used are pembrolizumab and sunitinib, with a preference for pembrolizumab. Neoadjuvant treatment is exceptional, even in initially unresectable cases. First-line treatment is mainly based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the choice of treatment is based on the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMCD) risk score. Patients at favourable risk receive ICIs in combination with TKIs. Patients classified as intermediate or poor risk receive ICIs, without preference for ICI + ICIs or ICI + TKIs. Data on nonclear cell renal cancer treatment are limited. Active surveillance has a place in treating favourable-risk patients. Either denosumab or zoledronic acid can be used for treating metastatic bone disease. CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are the standards of care for advanced disease. The utilization and sequencing of these therapeutic agents hinge upon individual risk scores and responses to previous treatments. This consensus reflects a commitment to informed decision-making, drawn from professional expertise and evidence in the medical literature.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Latin America , Consensus , Sunitinib
17.
Eur J Cancer ; 204: 114048, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653033

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) is associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) outcomes across different solid tumors, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer. Data regarding the prognostic and/or predictive role of LIPI in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are still scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether LIPI could be predictive of survival in mRCC patients. METHODS: We used patient level data from three different prospective studies (NIVOREN trial: nivolumab; TORAVA trial: VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy (TT); CheckMate 214: nivolumab-ipilimumab vs sunitinib). LIPI was calculated based on a derived neutrophils/(leukocyte-neutrophil) ratio > 3 and lactate-dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal, classifying patients into three groups (LIPI good, 0 factors;LIPI intermediate (int), 1 factor;LIPI poor, 2 factors) and/or into two groups (LIPI good, 0 factors;LIPI int/poor, 1-2 factors) according to trial sample size. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: In the Nivolumab dataset (n = 619), LIPI was significantly associated with OS (LIPI-good 30.1 vs 13.8 months in the LIPI int/poor; HR= 0.47) and PFS (HR=0.74). In the VEGF/VEGFR-TT dataset (n = 159), only a correlation with PFS was observed. In the CheckMate214 dataset (n = 1084), LIPI was significantly associated with OS (nivolumab-ipilimumab OS LIPI good vs int/poor: HR=0.55, p < 0.0001; sunitinib: OS LIPI good vs int/poor: 0.38, p < 0.0001) in both treatment groups in univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment-LIPI correlated with worse survival outcomes in mRCC treated with either ICI or antiangiogenic therapy, confirming LIPI's prognostic role in mRCC irrespective of systemic treatment used.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Lung Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/immunology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/secondary , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/immunology , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Prognosis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/immunology , Prospective Studies , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Adult
18.
ESMO Open ; 9(5): 102994, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642472

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab plus cabozantinib (NIVO + CABO) was approved for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) based on superiority versus sunitinib (SUN) in the phase III CheckMate 9ER trial (18.1 months median survival follow-up per database lock date); efficacy benefit was maintained with an extended 32.9 months of median survival follow-up. We report updated efficacy and safety after 44.0 months of median survival follow-up in intent-to-treat (ITT) patients and additional subgroup analyses, including outcomes by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic risk score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with treatment-naïve aRCC received NIVO 240 mg every 2 weeks plus CABO 40 mg once daily or SUN 50 mg for 4 weeks (6-week cycles), until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (maximum NIVO treatment, 2 years). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) per BICR, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: Overall, 323 patients were randomised to NIVO + CABO and 328 to SUN. Median PFS was improved with NIVO + CABO versus SUN [16.6 versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.71]; median OS favoured NIVO + CABO versus SUN (49.5 versus 35.5 months; HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.87). ORR (95% CI) was higher with NIVO + CABO versus SUN [56% (50% to 62%) versus 28% (23% to 33%)]; 13% versus 5% of patients achieved complete response, and median duration of response was 22.1 months versus 16.1 months, respectively. PFS and OS favoured NIVO + CABO over SUN across intermediate, poor and intermediate/poor IMDC risk subgroups; higher ORR and complete response rates were seen with NIVO + CABO versus SUN regardless of IMDC risk subgroup. Any-grade (grade ≥3) treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% (67%) versus 93% (55%) of patients treated with NIVO + CABO versus SUN. CONCLUSIONS: After extended follow-up, NIVO + CABO maintained survival and response benefits; safety remained consistent with previous follow-ups. These results continue to support NIVO + CABO as a first-line treatment for aRCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03141177.


Subject(s)
Anilides , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Nivolumab , Pyridines , Sunitinib , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/mortality , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Sunitinib/pharmacology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Anilides/therapeutic use , Anilides/pharmacology , Female , Middle Aged , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/pharmacology , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyridines/pharmacology , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Adult , Follow-Up Studies , Progression-Free Survival
19.
Cancer Invest ; 42(4): 278-296, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644691

ABSTRACT

This study aims to develop a prognostic signature based on m6A-related lncRNAs for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Differential expression analysis and Pearson correlation analysis were used to identify m6A-related lncRNAs associated with patient outcomes in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Our approach led to the development of an m6A-related lncRNA risk score (MRLrisk), formulated using six identified lncRNAs: NFE4, AL008729.2, AL139123.1, LINC02154, AC124854.1 and ARHGAP31-AS1. Higher MRLrisk was identified as a risk factor for patients' prognosis in ccRCC. Furthermore, an MRLrisk-based nomogram was developed and demonstrated as a reliable tool for prognosis prediction in ccRCC. Enrichment analysis and tumor mutation signature studies were conducted to investigate MRLrisk-related biological phenotypes. The tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) score was employed to infer patients' response to immunotherapy, indicating a negative correlation between high MRLrisk and immunotherapy response. Our focus then shifted to LINC02154 for deeper exploration. We assessed LINC02154 expression in 28 ccRCC/normal tissue pairs and 3 ccRCC cell lines through quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Functional experiments, including EdU incorporation, flow cytometry and transwell assays, were performed to assess the role of LINC02154 in ccRCC cell functions, discovering that its downregulation hinders cancer cell proliferation and migration. Furthermore, the influence of LINC02154 on ccRCC cells' sensitivity to Sunitinib was explored using CCK-8 assays, demonstrating that decreased LINC02154 expression increases Sunitinib sensitivity. In summary, this study successfully developed an MRLrisk model with significant prognostic value for ccRCC and established LINC02154 as a critical biomarker and prospective therapeutic target in ccRCC management.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , RNA, Long Noncoding , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , RNA, Long Noncoding/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Prognosis , Disease Progression , Cell Line, Tumor , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Cell Proliferation/genetics , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Sunitinib/pharmacology , Male , Female , Cell Movement/genetics , Adenosine/analogs & derivatives
20.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(3): 102073, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626661

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hand foot skin reaction (HFSR) is a common dose-limiting adverse effect of multi kinase inhibitors (MKI) whose mechanism is not fully understood, and the prophylaxis is inadequate. OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, a double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of topical urea in secondary prevention of sunitinib-induced HFSR in renal cell cancer patients. METHODS: Out of 55 screened patients, 14 were randomized to receive topical urea or placebo for four weeks. The association of HFSR with drug levels of sunitinib and its metabolite (n-desethyl sunitinib), genetic polymorphism of VEGFR2 gene, quality of life (QOL) and biochemical markers was also assessed. RESULTS: The results showed that urea-based cream was not superior to placebo (P = .075). There was no change in the QOL in both the groups. Single nucleotide polymorphism was checked for two nucleotides rs1870377 and rs2305948 located in VEGFR2 gene on chromosome 4. SNP (variant T > A) at rs1870377 was associated with appearance of new HFSR as compared to the wild type, although the association was not statistically significant (OR 0.714). There was no statistically significant difference between mean plasma levels of sunitinib and N-desethyl sunitinib in urea arm as compared to placebo arm as compared to placebo. The best fit population pharmacokinetic model for sunitinib was one compartment model with first order absorption and linear elimination. The median (IQR) of population parameters calculated from the population pharmacokinetics model for Ka, V and Cl was 0.22 (0.21-0.24) h-1, 4.4 (4.09-4.47) L, 0.049 (0.042-0.12) L/hr, respectively. CONCLUSION: The study suggested that the urea-based cream was not superior to placebo in decreasing the appearance of new HFSR in renal cancer patients receiving 4:2 regimen of sunitinib.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Hand-Foot Syndrome , Kidney Neoplasms , Sunitinib , Urea , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2 , Humans , Sunitinib/administration & dosage , Sunitinib/pharmacokinetics , Sunitinib/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Urea/analogs & derivatives , Urea/pharmacokinetics , Urea/administration & dosage , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Hand-Foot Syndrome/etiology , Hand-Foot Syndrome/prevention & control , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-2/genetics , Pilot Projects , Aged , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Administration, Topical , Adult , Indoles/administration & dosage , Indoles/pharmacokinetics , Indoles/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...