Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 253
Filter
1.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 149(3): 581e-589e, 2022 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35196702

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The demographics of plastic surgeons and plastic surgery trainees are changing, reflecting an increase in the diversity of medical school graduates. The authors investigated the gender diversity of speakers at several plastic surgery conferences and evaluated temporal trends over a 10-year period. METHODS: The following societies' conferences and years were included based on the conference agendas available for review: American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Plastic Surgery Research Council, American Association of Plastic Surgeons, Northeastern Society of Plastic Surgeons, and American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery. Differences in the average amount of time spoken were analyzed using an independent one-tailed t test. RESULTS: The number of female speakers and the time allotted to speak increased for all conferences. There was not a consistent difference in the amount of time individual men and women were allotted to speak. Across the five conferences, there was no consistent relationship found between years since board certification and female participation in conference. Gender diversity among speakers at plastic surgery conferences has not kept pace with the increase in female plastic surgery trainees because those who are selected to speak are overwhelmingly men. The hypothesis that a paucity of female speakers reflects the relatively shorter duration of career experience of female plastic surgeons was not supported by these findings. CONCLUSION: It is imperative that conferences increase the participation of women and strive toward more accurately reflecting the burgeoning role that female surgeons have in the field at present and will have in the future.


Subject(s)
Congresses as Topic/trends , Gender Equity/trends , Leadership , Physicians, Women/trends , Societies, Medical/trends , Surgeons/trends , Surgery, Plastic/trends , Congresses as Topic/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Male , Physicians, Women/organization & administration , Sexism/trends , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Surgeons/organization & administration , Surgery, Plastic/organization & administration , United States
2.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 58-63, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373086

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Perception of a surgeon based on physical attributes in the operating room (OR) environment has not been assessed, which was our primary goal. METHODS: A common OR scenario was simulated using 8 different actors as a lead surgeon with combinations of age (<40 vs. >55), race (white vs. black), and gender (male vs. female). One video scenario with a survey was electronically distributed to surgeons, residents, and OR nurses/staff. The overall rating, assessment, and perception of the lead surgeon were assessed. RESULTS: Of 974 respondents, 64.5% were females. There were significant differences in the rating and assessment based upon surgeon's age (p = .01) favoring older surgeons. There were significant differences in the assessments of surgeons by the study group (p = .03). The positive assessments as well as perceptions trended highest towards male, older, and white surgeons, especially in the stressful situation. CONCLUSION: While perception of gender bias may be widespread, age and race biases may also play a role in the OR. Inter-professional education training for OR teams could be developed to help alleviate such biases.


Subject(s)
Ageism/psychology , Operating Rooms/organization & administration , Racism/psychology , Sexism/psychology , Surgeons/psychology , Adult , Ageism/statistics & numerical data , Computer Simulation , Female , Humans , Leadership , Male , Middle Aged , Operating Rooms/statistics & numerical data , Perception , Racism/statistics & numerical data , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/organization & administration , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
3.
Surgery ; 171(2): 498-503, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34593253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As the healthcare needs of transgender patients become increasingly recognized and supported, gender-affirming surgery services are in increasing demand. However, establishing a gender-affirming surgery service is unlike many other surgical specialties and requires unique expertise and administrative support. The aim of this article is to outline the considerations for starting a gender-affirming surgery service and identify pearls for success. METHODS: In this article, we describe the critical components of building and maintaining a successful gender-affirming surgery service. We intersperse findings from our own experiences developing a gender-affirming surgery service. RESULTS: A successful gender-affirming surgery service starts by developing a clear vision of the patient population within your hospital system's area, as well as the design of your center. Establishing a center relies on early engagement of hospital administration and its continued support. A multidisciplinary team with intensive interpersonal and operative training offers the best patient experience and surgical outcomes. By following these steps, our service has been able to provide gender-affirming surgery to more than 200 patients since its inception. Future goals entail partnerships with other institutions and continued outcomes evaluation to ensure sustained success of all gender-affirming surgery services. CONCLUSION: Although there are unique challenges and considerations for establishing a gender-affirming surgery service, careful planning and stakeholder engagement allow providers to deliver high-quality care. We hope that our experience can serve as a model for future much needed gender-affirming surgery services.


Subject(s)
Gender Dysphoria/surgery , Sex Reassignment Surgery , Specialties, Surgical/organization & administration , Stakeholder Participation , Surgeons/organization & administration , Female , Gender Dysphoria/psychology , Humans , Male , Patient Care Planning , Quality of Health Care , Specialties, Surgical/methods , Transgender Persons/psychology
4.
Surgery ; 171(1): 252-258, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34598776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite increasing numbers of women in surgery, female underrepresentation in surgical societies remains an ongoing issue. We sought to determine the gender composition of presenters at the American Association of Endocrine Surgery annual meetings. METHODS: Utilizing previous meeting data, we collected gender information for presenters from 2010 to 2019, including first/senior author combinations. Awards winners and invited lecturers were also reviewed. We performed binomial testing to analyze proportions of male to female presenters, with significance set at P < .05. Temporal trends were analyzed via linear regression. RESULTS: Fifty-six percent of American Association of Endocrine Surgery fellows and 36% of members are female. Of 354 podium and 477 poster presentations, women were listed less often as first (42.7%, P = .007) and senior (30.6%, P < .0001) podium authors and less often as first (42.8%, P = .002) and senior (29.8%, P < .0001) poster authors. The most common combination of first/senior authors was male-male (43.1%), followed by female-male (26.8%), female-female (16.1%), and male-female (14.0%). Less than 15% of invited lecturers were women, and women represented a minority in nearly all award categories. We observed a positive trend in female first authorship over time (slope = 0.766, 95% confidence interval, 0.70%-2.23%, P = .26) but no change in female senior authorship over time (slope = 0.03348, 95% confidence interval, 1.086%-1.153%, P = .95). CONCLUSION: Women are underrepresented as American Association of Endocrine Surgery presenters and less likely to receive awards or deliver invited lectures. Although female first authorship increased over time, women continued to lag behind men as senior authors and mentors to trainees and junior faculty. Opportunities to improve speaker and awardee representation should be explored.


Subject(s)
Awards and Prizes , Endocrinology/statistics & numerical data , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Authorship , Congresses as Topic/statistics & numerical data , Endocrinology/organization & administration , Faculty/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Leadership , Male , Retrospective Studies , Sexism/prevention & control , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/organization & administration , United States
6.
J Vasc Surg ; 75(1): 296-300, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34314830

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, multidisciplinary "toe and flow" programs have gained great popularity, with proven benefits in limb salvage. Many vascular surgeons have incorporated podiatrists into their practices. The viability of this practice model requires close partnership, hospital support, and financial sustainability. We intend to examine the economic values of podiatrists in a busy safety-net hospital in the Southwest United States. METHODS: An administrative database that captured monthly operating room (OR) cases, clinic encounters, in-patient volume, and total work relative value units (wRVUs) in an established limb salvage program in a tertiary referral center were examined. The practice has a diverse patient population with >30% of minority patients. During a period of 3 years, there was a significant change in the number of podiatrists (from 1 to 4) within the program, whereas the clinical full-time employees for vascular surgeons remained relatively stable. RESULTS: The limb salvage program experienced >100% of growth in total OR volumes, clinic encounters, and total wRVUs over a period of 4 years. A total of 35,591 patients were evaluated in a multidisciplinary limb salvage clinic, and 5535 procedures were performed. The initial growth of clinic volume and operative volume (P < .01) were attributed by the addition of vascular surgeons in year one. However, recruitment of podiatrists to the program significantly increased clinic and OR volume by an additional 60% and >40%, respectively (P < .01) in the past 3 years. With equal number of surgeons, podiatry contributed 40% of total wRVUs generated by the entire program in 2019. Despite the fact that that most of the foot and ankle procedures that were regularly performed by vascular surgeons were shifted to the podiatrists, vascular surgeons continued to experience an incremental increase in operative volume and >10% of increase in wRVUs. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the value of close collaboration between podiatry and vascular in a limb salvage program extends beyond a patient's clinical outcome. A financial advantage of including podiatrists in a vascular surgery practice is clearly demonstrated.


Subject(s)
Limb Salvage/methods , Patient Care Team/economics , Podiatry/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Surgeons/economics , Amputation, Surgical/statistics & numerical data , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Intersectoral Collaboration , Limb Salvage/economics , Lower Extremity/blood supply , Lower Extremity/surgery , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Podiatry/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Retrospective Studies , Surgeons/organization & administration
7.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 71-75, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34315578

ABSTRACT

We aimed to analyze the representativeness of women surgeons in academic and leadership positions in Brazil. We investigated women representativeness across surgical departments of 25 Brazilian universities (2020); across boards of 10 Brazilian surgical societies (2020), and, as speakers, in 281 surgical events (Jan-2014 to Dec-2020). From 383 individuals in university departments, 43 (11.2 %) were women (p < 0.001). Only three universities had women as department chairs. From 163 positions in surgical societies, only 14 positions (8.6 %) were held by women (p < 0.001). The underrepresentation is worse in prestigious positions (presidency and vice-presidency), in which only 1 (5 %) were women. In 281 surgical events, there were 6686 speakers, of which only 886 (13.3 %) of these were women (p < 0.001). Further studies are needed to elucidate the possible causes for the gender gap in these scenarios in Brazil, so as to implement effective strategies to improve gender representativeness in surgery in the country.


Subject(s)
Faculty, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Leadership , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Brazil , Female , Humans , Male , Physicians, Women/organization & administration , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Surgeons/organization & administration
8.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 6-11, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332744

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Burnout, often regarded as an individual failing, rather than a systemic one, negatively impacts quality of care, patient safety and healthcare costs. Focusing on improving well-being can help mitigate burnout. This study examined protective factors that promote well-being and professional fulfillment in surgeons. METHODS: Using a purposive sample, 32 semi-structured 30-60-min interviews were conducted with surgeons of varying sub-specialties and rank. Abductive exploratory analysis was used to code and interpret interview transcripts and to build a conceptual model of surgeon well-being. RESULTS: Emergent protective factors were placed into one of three levels of implementation: individual, team-level, and institutional (figure). Individual factors for well-being included autonomy and adequate time to pursue non-clinical endeavors. Team-level factors consisted of adaptability, boundaries, and cohesion. Institutional factors related to diversifying performance evaluations and celebrating and recognizing individual value and contributions. CONCLUSIONS: The conceptual model developed from the results of this study highlights factors important to surgeons' professional well-being. This model can be used to guide quality improvement efforts.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Job Satisfaction , Specialties, Surgical/organization & administration , Surgeons/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Administrative Personnel/organization & administration , Burnout, Professional/psychology , Faculty, Medical/organization & administration , Faculty, Medical/psychology , Female , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Models, Organizational , Qualitative Research , Quality Improvement , Surgeons/organization & administration , Utah , Work-Life Balance/organization & administration
9.
Am J Surg ; 223(1): 47-52, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34332745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Women account for 19 % of practicing surgeons in the United States, with representation decreasing with higher academic rank. Less is known about the proportion of women in editorial leadership positions at surgical journals. The objective of this study was to examine gender representation among editorial leadership at high-impact surgical journals. METHODS: The five journals with the highest impact factors in general, cardiothoracic, plastics, otolaryngology, orthopedics, urology, vascular, and neurosurgery were identified. Data were abstracted on the proportion of women editors-in-chief (EIC) and editorial board members between 2010 and 2020 to determine how these demographics changed over time. RESULTS: Multiple fields had no women EIC over the past decade (orthopedics, urology, cardiothoracic, neurosurgery). In all other fields, women were a minority of EIC. In 2020, women made up 7.9 % of EIC and 11.1 % of editorial boards in surgical journals. CONCLUSIONS: Women remain under-represented among leadership at high-impact surgical journals, with varying improvement over the past decade among different subspecialties.


Subject(s)
Faculty, Medical/organization & administration , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Publishing/organization & administration , Sexism/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/organization & administration , Faculty, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Leadership , Publishing/statistics & numerical data , Sexism/prevention & control , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , United States
11.
Surgery ; 171(2): 437-446, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34728081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the New Zealand government instituted a 4-level alert system, which resulted in the rapid dissolution of nonurgent surgical services to minimize occupational exposure to both patients and staff, with the primary health sector bearing most of the diverted caseload. Consequently, the study authors sought to collate information around the establishment of a supportive nonacute surgical liaison role in a public hospital surgical department, with an interest in establishing this role in New Zealand. METHODS: The narrative review conducted systematically in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Databases searched included Pubmed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials. A deductive analysis was applied using a demand management model developed by the Institute for Innovation and Improvement at Waitemata District Health Board. All included studies were rated using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence tool. RESULTS: Collation of 19 studies resulted in 3 key findings: first, that a surgical liaison could be utilized at the primary care to specialist interface to improve communication and workflow between services. Second, a liaison could be utilized directly communicating with patients as a means of increasing engagement and self-management. Finally, this service can be offered through multiple modalities including a noncontact telehealth service. CONCLUSION: Evidence of nonacute surgical liaisons both internationally and specifically within New Zealand has been collated to provide evidence for its application.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Elective Surgical Procedures , Nurse's Role , Physician's Role , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Secondary Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Global Health , Humans , Nurse Practitioners/organization & administration , Surgeons/organization & administration , Workflow
13.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 107(3): e1096-e1105, 2022 02 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34718629

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Little is known about provider specialties involved in thyroid cancer diagnosis and management. OBJECTIVE: Characterize providers involved in diagnosing and treating thyroid cancer. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: We surveyed patients with differentiated thyroid cancer from the Georgia and Los Angeles County Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results registries (N = 2632, 63% response rate). Patients identified their primary care physicians (PCPs), who were also surveyed (N = 162, 56% response rate). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Patient-reported provider involvement (endocrinologist, surgeon, PCP) at diagnosis and treatment; (2) PCP-reported involvement (more vs less) and comfort (more vs less) with discussing diagnosis and treatment. RESULTS: Among thyroid cancer patients, 40.6% reported being informed of their diagnosis by their surgeon, 37.9% by their endocrinologist, and 13.5% by their PCP. Patients reported discussing their treatment with their surgeon (71.7%), endocrinologist (69.6%), and PCP (33.3%). Physician specialty involvement in diagnosis and treatment varied by patient race/ethnicity and age. For example, Hispanic patients (vs non-Hispanic White) were more likely to report their PCP informed them of their diagnosis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.68; 95% CI, 1.24-2.27). Patients ≥65 years (vs <45 years) were more likely to discuss treatment with their PCP (OR: 1.59; 95% CI, 1.22-2.08). Although 74% of PCPs reported discussing their patients' diagnosis and 62% their treatment, only 66% and 48%, respectively, were comfortable doing so. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs were involved in thyroid cancer diagnosis and treatment, and their involvement was greater among older patients and patients of minority race/ethnicity. This suggests an opportunity to leverage PCP involvement in thyroid cancer management to improve health and quality of care outcomes for vulnerable patients.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Quality Improvement , Thyroid Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Cohort Studies , Endocrinologists/organization & administration , Endocrinologists/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physicians, Primary Care/organization & administration , Physicians, Primary Care/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/organization & administration , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/organization & administration , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...