Novel System of Simulation Models for Aneurysm Clipping Training: Description of Models and Assessment of Face, Content, and Construct Validity.

BACKGROUND: Aneurysm clipping simulation models are needed to provide tactile feedback of biological vessels in a nonhazardous but surgically relevant environment. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel system of simulation models for aneurysm clipping training and assess its validity. METHODS: Craniotomy models were fabricated to mimic actual tissues and movement restrictions experienced during actual surgery. Turkey wing vessels were used to create aneurysm models with patient-specific geometry. Three simulation models (middle cerebral artery aneurysm clipping via a pterional approach, anterior cerebral artery aneurysm clipping via an interhemispheric approach, and basilar artery aneurysm clipping via an orbitozygomatic pretemporal approach) were subjected to face, content, and construct validity assessments by experienced neurosurgeons (n = 8) and neurosurgery trainees (n = 8). RESULTS: Most participants scored the model as replicating actual aneurysm clipping well and scored the difficulty of clipping as being comparable to that of real surgery, confirming face validity. Most participants responded that the model could improve clip-applier-handling skills when working with patients, which confirms content validity. Experienced neurosurgeons performed significantly better than trainees on all 3 models based on subjective (P = .003) and objective (P < .01) ratings and on time to complete the task (P = .04), which confirms construct validity. Simulations were used to discuss clip application strategies and compare them to prototype clinical cases. CONCLUSION: This novel aneurysm clipping model can be used safely outside the wet laboratory; it has high face, content, and construct validity; and it can be an effective training tool for microneurosurgery training during aneurysm surgery courses.

Implementation of an Intraoperative Instructional Timeout Just Prior to Stapler Use Improves Proficiency of Surgical Stapler Usage by Surgery Residents.

INTRODUCTION: With the fragmented rotational structure of training, exposure to surgical staplers is not uniform across surgical residents. Traditionally, educational sessions dedicated to instruction in surgical staplers have taken place outside the operating room. This study implemented and evaluated an intraoperative timeout immediately prior to stapler use in cases with surgical residents. METHODS: During general surgery cases from June 1, 2017 until December 31, 2017, surgical teams, including the surgical attending, surgical resident, and scrub nurse participated in an intraoperative instructional timeout, during which proper use of linear or circular staplers was reviewed. At the conclusion of the timeout, residents were required to demonstrate proper stapler assembly and verbalize all technical steps involved in stapler use. Duration of each timeout was recorded. Immediately following the case, a pre-post survey was administered to each participating junior (R1-R2) or senior (R4-R5) surgical resident. The primary outcome was change in stapler use knowledge by surgical residents. Survey questions with Likert scale responses were analyzed using paired ttests, and responses from junior residents were compared to those from senior residents with independent t tests. RESULTS: Forty-three general surgery cases involved stapler use during the study period and implemented an intraoperative instructional timeout. The educational intervention increased stapler use knowledge significantly in all surgical residents. Prior to the timeout, junior residents reported significantly higher anxiety related to stapler usage compared to their senior counterparts; anxiety scores in junior residents decreased significantly for use of both linear and circular staplers. The mean timeout duration was 2.9 minutes (standard deviation 0.9 minutes, range 1.2-4.6 minutes). All participating surgical residents recommended routine implementation of an instructional timeout prior to intraoperative stapler use. CONCLUSIONS: An intraoperative timeout dedicated to stapler teaching is effective in increasing proficiency and easing anxiety in all levels of surgical residents. Further research is warranted to determine whether this educational intervention would translate into fewer stapler use errors and decreased intraoperative complications.

One stage functional end-to-end stapled intestinal anastomosis and resection performed by nonexpert surgeons for the treatment of small intestinal obstruction in 30 dogs.

OBJECTIVES: To describe stapled 1-stage functional end-to-end intestinal anastomosis for treatment of small intestinal obstruction in dogs and evaluate outcome when the technique is performed by nonexpert surgeons after limited training in the technique. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. ANIMALS: Dogs (n=30) with intestinal lesions requiring an enterectomy. METHODS: Stapled 1-stage functional end-to-end anastomosis and resection using a GIA-60 and a TA-55 stapling devices were performed under supervision of senior residents and faculty surgeons by junior surgeons previously trained in the technique on pigs. Procedure duration and technical problems were recorded. Short-term results were collected during hospitalization and at suture removal. Long-term outcome was established by clinical and ultrasonographic examinations at least 2 months after surgery and from written questionnaires, completed by owners. RESULTS: Mean±SD procedure duration was 15±12 minutes. Postoperative recovery was uneventful in 25 dogs. One dog had anastomotic leakage, 1 had a localized abscess at the transverse staple line, and 3 dogs developed an incisional abdominal wall abscess. No long-term complications occurred (follow-up, 2-32 months). CONCLUSION: Stapled 1-stage functional end-to-end anastomosis and resection is a fast and safe procedure in the hand of nonexpert but trained surgeons.

Face, content and construct validity of a new realistic trainer for conventional techniques in digestive surgery.

PURPOSE: Surgical simulation modules for "open" surgery are limited in contrast to well-studied and validated laparoscopic trainers. In this study, face, content and construct validity of a devised simulation module (Berlin Operation Trainer, BOPT) for handsewn anastomoses in digestive surgery were analysed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants of a skills course for digestive surgery (novices: 1-3 years of training; experts: more than 5 years of training) were timed on performing four defined handsewn digestive anastomoses on formalin fixed porcine intestine in the BOPT. Questionnaires were answered regarding impression with the simulation module concerning appearance and realism using a five-point Likert and a three-point forced choice scale. Face and content validities were evaluated based on the responses of participants and construct validity by comparing novices to experts. Data collected were analysed with Fisher's exact test and two-sample t test. RESULTS: Twenty-two novices (median: second postgraduate year) and 26 experts (median: seventh postgraduate year) were enrolled in the study. The BOPT showed strong face and content validities with average scores for satisfaction parameters above 4.2 +/- 0.41 and 4.1 +/- 0.22, respectively. Construct validity was adequate for anastomosis simulation in the BOPT based on different percentages of anastomosis complete during set time between novices and experts as shown for simple (68.2% vs. 92.3%, p = 0.038) and for difficult anastomosis (18.2% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.021). CONCLUSIONS: The BOPT is a suitable instrument for advanced surgical training for novices and experienced colleagues creating a realistic and demanding situation. Further studies have to evaluate if a more realistic preoperative training will support an effective transfer of learned techniques to the operating room.

Face, content, and construct validities of inanimate intestinal anastomoses simulation.

PURPOSE: Surgical simulation modules for "open" surgery are limited and not well studied or validated. Available simulation modules use either synthetic material, which is convenient but may not mimic what is observed or felt in the operating room, or live animal laboratories, which can simulate human tissue but are costly and not readily available. An intestinal anastomosis simulation was devised with thawed porcine intestine. In this study, the face, content, and construct validities of this simulation module were analyzed for both hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses. METHODS: Participants were timed on performing a 2-layered, hand-sewn anastomosis, as well as a side-to-side, functional, end-to-end, stapled anastomosis on thawed porcine small bowel. Anastomoses were examined for adequacy and measured for luminal narrowing and bursting pressure by intraluminal saline infusion. Questionnaires were answered regarding impressions with the simulation modules. Face, content, and construct validities were evaluated by comparing junior residents to senior residents and faculty. Data collected were analyzed with 2-sample t-tests. RESULTS: Both hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses showed strong face and content validity. Overall impressions of these inanimate simulation modules were a positive experience as reflected by the comments of participants. For hand-sewn anastomoses, a significant difference was found between junior and senior group times (50.0 +/- 17.2 vs 33.0 +/- 9.7 minutes, p = 0.013) as well as PGY-1 and faculty times (64.0 +/- 7.2 vs 28.0 +/- 3.8 minutes, p = 0.001). Bursting pressures varied between both groups and were not significant. For stapled anastomoses, no difference was noted between the various groups in completion time or bursting pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-sewn and stapled inanimate intestinal anastomoses are a valid simulation of intraoperative experience based on the face and content validities. Although stapled anastomosis does not have good construct validity, the more challenging hand-sewn anastomosis does differentiate between various skill levels.

Skills acquisition for laparoscopic gastric bypass in the training laboratory: an innovative approach.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is a technically demanding procedure, with a long learning curve. The aim of this study was three-fold: to develop a task-based approach to training in LRYGBP, define a tool for objective technical skills assessments, and objectively determine the efficacy of this approach. METHODS: Videos of expert and novice surgeons performing LRYGBP on patients and anesthetised porcine models were analyzed to define an appropriate task for skills assessment. Subsequently, a jejuno-jejunostomy model was developed using cadaveric porcine small bowel, placed into a video-box trainer. 27 surgeons of varying experience levels in advanced laparoscopic procedures performed the task. Assessments of technical skill were by hand motion analysis and video-based scoring. A further 16 surgeons inexperienced in LRYGBP attended a task-based hands-on training course and performed the jejuno-jejunostomy task at start and end of the course. RESULTS: The jejuno-jejunostomy model differentiated between surgeons of varying experience levels for time taken (P<0.001), economy of movement (P=0.001) and video scores (P<0.001). Surgeons attending the training course made significant improvements in time taken (P=0.002) and economy of movement (P=0.006), although not for generic video scores (P=0.243) by the end of course. CONCLUSIONS: The structured, task-based approach for commencement of training in LRYGBP leads to objective improvements in the technical skills of inexperienced surgeons at the end of a short course. The next stage of the curriculum should be to achieve proficiency in the complete procedure on an anesthetised porcine model, prior to preceptorship on human cases.