Clostridium difficile infection after stoma reversal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been described in the early post-operative phase after stoma reversal. This systematic review aimed to describe the incidence of CDI after stoma reversal and to identify pre-operative variables correlated with an increased risk of infection. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines in March 2024. Manuscripts were included if reported at least one patient with CDI-associated diarrhoea following stoma reversal (colostomy/ileostomy). The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of CDI; the secondary outcome was the comparison of clinical variables (age, sex, time to stoma reversal, neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapies after index colorectal procedure) in CDI-positive versus CDI-negative patients. A meta-analysis was performed when at least three studies reported on those variables. RESULTS: Out of 43 eligible manuscripts, 1 randomized controlled trial and 10 retrospective studies were selected, including 17,857 patients (2.1% CDI). Overall, the mean age was 64.3 ± 11.6 years in the CDI group and 61.5 ± 12.6 years in the CDI-negative group (p = 0.51), with no significant difference in sex (p = 0.34). Univariable analyses documented that the mean time to stoma reversal was 53.9 ± 19.1 weeks in CDI patients and 39.8 ± 15.0 weeks in CDI-negative patients (p = 0.40) and a correlation between neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatments with CDI (p < 0.001). A meta-analysis was performed for time to stoma reversal, age, sex, and neo-adjuvant therapies disclosing no significant differences for CDI (stoma delay, MD 11.59; 95%CI  24.32-1.13; age, MD 0.97; 95%CI 2.08-4.03; sex, OR1.11; 95%CI 0.88-1.41; neo-adjuvant, OR0.81; 95%CI 0.49-1.35). Meta-analysis including patients who underwent adjuvant therapy evidenced a higher risk of CDI (OR 2.88; 95%CI 1.01-8.17, p = 0.11). CONCLUSION: CDI occurs in approximately 2.1% of patients after stoma reversal. Although a trend of increased delay in stoma reversal and a correlation with chemotherapy were documented in CDI patients, the use of adjuvant therapy was the only possible risk factor documented on meta-analysis. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023484704.

Analysis of the Stomal Microbiota of a Percutaneous Osseointegrated Prosthesis: A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study.

Percutaneous osseointegrated (OI) prostheses (POPs) are used to skeletally attach artificial limbs in amputees. While any permanent percutaneous interface is at risk of becoming infected by the resident microbiota colonizing the stoma, most of these patients remain infection-free. Avoidance of infection likely depends upon a mechanically and/or biologically stable skin-to-implant interface. The ultimate question remains, "why do some stomata become infected while others do not?" The answer might be found in the dynamic bacterial communities of the patient and within the stomal site itself. This study is an appendix to the first Food and Drug Administration approved prospective early feasibility study of OI prosthetic docking, in which, 10 transfemoral amputees were implanted with a unique POP device. In this analytical, longitudinal cohort study, each patient's skin and stomal microbiota were analyzed from the initial surgery to 1 year following the second-stage surgery. During each follow-up visit, three swab samples-stomal, device thigh skin and contralateral thigh skin-were obtained. DNA was extracted, and bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes were amplified and sequenced to profile microbial communities. The stomal microbiota were distinct from the microbiota on the adjacent thigh skin and the skin of the contralateral thigh, with a significantly increased abundance of Staphylococcus aureus within the stoma. Early on stomal microbiota were characterized by high diversity and high relative abundance of obligate anaerobes. Over time, the stomal microbiota shifted and stabilized in communities of lower diversity dominated by Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and/or Staphylococcus spp. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2645-2654, 2019.

Prospective Assessment of Peristomal Infections Using Objective Criteria.

BACKGROUND: Enteral nutrition (EN) is a safe and cost-effective intervention with significant morbidity and mortality benefit that can also be associated with complications. Peristomal infections can occur in 5%-30% of cases after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. Despite this common occurrence, widespread use of objective diagnostic criteria is not prevalent, possibly leading to overuse of antibiotics. METHODS: All patients who were reporting symptoms consistent with peristomal infection were evaluated. Criteria based on erythema, induration, and exudates were applied with cumulative score ≥8 indicating peristomal infection. All patients were followed, with additional factors being collected if available. RESULTS: Forty-three patients noted complaints consistent with peristomal infection. In patients with a score <8 (n = 16), only 2 required antibiotics (12.5%) and 1 patient was hospitalized (6.3%). In patients with a score ≥8 (n = 27), 16 had a score of 8 or 9; all patients responded to antibiotics (100%), and 1 was hospitalized (6.3%). In patients with a score ≥10, all (100%) were treated with antibiotics. Five of 11 (45%) patients were hospitalized, with the most common diagnosis being sepsis. Of the baseline variables analyzed, higher body mass index correlated with score ≥10 (26.36 ± 2.94 vs 22.91 ± 4.35 in score <9, P = .0128). CONCLUSIONS: Objective criteria were effective in risk stratifying patients who presented with reports of peristomal infection. Patients with a score <8 tended to be at low risk, scores of 8-9 were of moderate risk, and patients with a score ≥10 were at high risk and required very close monitoring or hospitalization.

Effects of 3 Different Methods of Care on the Peristomal Skin Integrity of Children with Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: There are a limited number of studies examining the effects of products used in stoma care. This study compares the effects of 3 different methods of care on the peristomal skin integrity of children with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes. METHODS: In this randomized controlled study, 60 children were allocated to the 3 study groups (group 1: hydrogel, group 2: soap and water, group 3: saline solution). Dressings were changed daily for all groups during the first week, then weekly for group 1 and daily for groups 2 and 3. The evaluations were performed using a PEG Region Peristomal Skin Integrity Observation Form and devices measuring stoma region pH, moisture, and temperature. One evaluation was performed in a hospital and 4 during home visits in the first month after PEG insertion. MAIN RESULTS: Moisture levels in the stoma region were normal in the saline solution group, high in the hydrogel group, and low in the soap and water group (P < .05). Complications potentially affecting peristomal skin integrity in the stoma region (erythema, drainage, hemorrhage, hypergranulation tissue) were observed most frequently in the soap and water group (5%-45%) and least frequently in the hydrogel group (15%-25%). However, there was no statistically significant difference among the groups with respect to these complications (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: Because the dressing requires 6 times fewer changes per month, and wound site infection in the stoma site is minimized, the use of glycerin hydrogel should be considered for inclusion in pediatric stoma care procedures.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site infections-Incidence and risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement is the modality of choice for long-term enteral nutrition in view of technical ease and cost-effectiveness. Peristomal infection (PI) remains the most common complication following PEG tube placement. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and risk factors for PI and outline a microbiological profile that can aid in prophylactic and therapeutic strategies. METHODS: A retrospective study of 781 patients who underwent PEG placement (Cook PEG-Pull-S-20Fr/24Fr) from 2010 to 2015 at our tertiary care center were included. Relevant data were collected from the hospital electronic medical records. The incidence of PI was computed and potential risk factors were assessed using univariate analysis. The microbiological profile was created along with sensitivity patterns after reviewing the culture reports. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20.0. RESULTS: PEG tube placement was performed in 781 patients (mean age 55.9 ± 36.1; M:F = 2:75). The major indication was oropharyngeal malignancies. PI was seen in 171 patients (21.9%). Diabetes mellitus, duration of hospital stay more than 7 days, and hypoalbuminemia were found to be significant risk factors for the development of PI (p < 0.05). Patients who had chemotherapy or radiotherapy before PEG placement had a higher incidence of peristomal infections (p 0.00). Pseudomonas and Klebsiella were the most common organisms causing infection. CONCLUSIONS: PI remains a significant complication of PEG placement. Pseudomonas and Klebsiella are the most common organisms and prophylactic antibiotic protocols should be tailored accordingly. Elective PEG before the institution of chemotherapy/radiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal malignancies is recommended.

Pioderma gangrenoso periestomal tras adenocarcinoma de recto en el contexto de enfermedad de Crohn de localización colónica y perianal compleja / Peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum after rectal adenocarcinoma in the context of colonic and complex perianal Crohn's disease

No disponible

Rare Complication of Stomas: Peristomal Necrotizing Fasciitis.

INTRODUCTION: A stoma formation is a frequently performed procedure in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Although stoma formation is a simple process, it should be performed with caution. The aim of this study was to attract physicians' attention to this rare disease and also to identify the surgical and medical treatment options for peristomal necrotizing fasciitis as a rare complication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Risk factors including age, sex, additional diseases, previous surgical procedures, source of infection, physical findings, and vital signs of 14 patients with peristomal necrotizing fasciitis over a period of 10 years from 2005 to 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 14 patients, 9 were men and 5 were women. The average age was 63.28 years (range, 45-85 years). Risk factors were also observed: diabetes mellitus, 4 (28.57%); obesity, 3 (21.42%); alcoholism, 1 (7.14%); and malignancy, 10 (71.42%). Prophylactic antibiotic treatment was given to all patients, and they all underwent debridement and stoma replacement. CONCLUSION: Peristomal necrotizing fasciitis is an urgent and mortal disease. Risk factors, physical findings, and infection sources should be determined, and treatment modalities should be applied immediately. Medical treatment and surgical options should be performed, and vacuum devices should also be considered when treating this complication.

Candida species isolation in peristomal skin in patients with abdominal stomas and correlation to clinical signs: a descriptive pilot study.

The reported prevalence of candidiasis in peristomal skin varies greatly. Very few studies exist that correlate the clinical findings around the peristomal skin to the mycology. In this study, the authors report on Candida species prevalence, clinical correlation, and mycology.

Effect of Helicobacter pylori on marginal ulcer and stomal stenosis after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data have been published regarding whether Helicobacter pylori (HP) positivity is associated with increased complication rates in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). METHODS: We retrospectively examined the rate of complications in patients undergoing RYGB according to preoperative HP positivity and persistent post-treatment positivity to determine whether a correlation exists. RESULTS: A total of 228 patients underwent RYGB during a 2-year period (2009-2011). No patient had evidence of active ulcer disease on preoperative endoscopy. Of the 228 patients, 68 tested positive for HP on serum antigen screening and were treated with omeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxillin. After treatment, 24 patients were persistently positive on repeat endoscopic biopsy. Of the 228 patients, 12 experienced a total of 13 complications (stomal stenosis in 8, marginal ulcer in 5, and none with anastomotic leak or gastrointestinal bleeding). Of the 68 patients with HP positivity preoperatively, 1 complication (2.3%) developed in the 44 patients who had responded to triple therapy, and no complications occurred in the 24 patients who had remained positive after treatment (P = 1.00), showing no difference. Also, no significant difference was found in the rate of complications (P = .11) between patients who were HP negative preoperatively (11 of 160, 6.9%) and those who were positive preoperatively (1 of 68, 1.5%). CONCLUSION: HP status, whether positive preoperatively or persistently positive after treatment, had no effect on the marginal ulcer or stomal stenosis rates in patients undergoing RYGB in the present study.

Peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a 7-year surveillance of 297 patients / Infecção peristomal na gastrostomia endoscópica percutânea: estudo de 297 doentes gastrostomizados ao longo de 7 anos

CONTEXT: Healthcare-associated infection represents the most frequent adverse event during care delivery. Medical advances like percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy have brought improvement on quality of life to patients but an increased risk of healthcare-associated infection. Predictive risk factors for peristomal wound infection are largely unknown but evidence suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis and preventive strategies related to infection control may reduce infection rates. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to evaluate the global prevalence rate of peristomal infection. Secondary objectives were to characterise the positive culture results, to evaluate the prophylactic antibiotic protocol and to identify potential risk factors for peristomal infection. METHODS: Retrospective study of 297 patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy performed at a general hospital between January 2004 and September 2010. Patients received prophylactic cefazolin before the endoscopic gastrostomy procedure. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, underling disease conditions to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and patient potential intrinsic risk factors. Statistical analysis was made with the statistical program SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: A total of 297 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes were inserted. Wound infection occurred in 36 patients (12.1%). Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant was the most frequently isolated microorganism (33.3%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.6%). The incidence rate had been rising each year and differ from 4.65% in 2004/2007 to 17.9% in 2008/2010. This finding was consistent with the increasing of prevalence global infection rates of the hospital. Most of the infections (55.6%) were detected in the first 10 days post procedure. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index values, mean survival time and duration of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding between patients with and without periostomal infection. Institutional factors, namely global prevalence infection rates and the endemic character of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant, play an important role in peristomal infection rates. Traditional antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin is not adequate due to the prevalence of resistant organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Peristomal infection is a frequent problem with clinical impact in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy patients and should be considered a healthcare associated infection. The antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens using cephalosporins are not adequate and need to be reviewed due to the high prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant and other resistant organisms in hospitals and nursing homes.

CONTEXTO: As infeções associadas aos cuidados de saúde constituem o mais frequente efeito adverso observado durante a prestação de cuidados de saúde. Os avanços clínicos como a gastrostomia endoscópica percutânea melhoraram a qualidade de vida dos doentes mas trouxeram um risco acrescido de infeções associadas aos cuidados de saúde. Os fatores de risco para a infecção peristomal são pouco conhecidos, mas a profilaxia antibiótica e outras estratégias profiláticas parecem reduzir a infeção peristomal. OBJETIVOS: O objetivo primário foi a avaliação global da taxa de infecção peristomal e a caracterização microbiológica dos agentes infetantes. Foram objetivos secundários a avaliação do protocolo de profilaxia antibiótica utilizado e a identificação de potenciais fatores de risco para a infeção peristomal. MÉTODO: Estudo retrospetivo em doentes submetidos a gastrostomia endoscópica entre janeiro de 2004 e setembro de 2010. Os doentes receberam profilaxia antibiótica com cefazolina antes do procedimento. Os processos clínicos foram revistos obtendo-se os dados demográficos, diagnóstico da doença subjacente e potenciais fatores de risco para infeção. A análise estatística foi feita com recurso ao programa SPSS 17.0. RESULTADOS: Foram gastrostomizados 297 doentes adultos. A infeção peristomal afetou 36 doentes (12,1%). O Staphylococcus aureus resistente à metacilina foi o micro-organismo mais frequentemente isolado (33,3%) seguido pela Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30,6%). A incidência de infeção peristomal aumentou progressivamente ao longo dos anos de 4,65% em 2004/2007 até 17,9% em 2008/2010. Este achado foi consistente com o crescimento global da infeção hospitalar. A maioria das infeções peristomais (55,6%) foi identificada nos primeiros 10 dias após a gastrostomia. Não encontramos diferenças significativas na prevalência da infeção peristomal relacionáveis com a idade, índice de massa corporal, sobrevida e duração da nutrição por gastrostomia endoscópica percutânea. Fatores institucionais, como a prevalência global da infeção hospitalar e o caráter endêmico do MRSA, são importantes na infeção peristomal e a profilaxia tradicional com cefazolina não é adequada num contexto de elevada prevalência de micro-organismos resistentes. CONCLUSÕES: A infeção peristomal é um problema frequente e clinicamente significativo que deve ser encarado como infeção associada aos cuidados de saúde. A profilaxia usando cefalosporinas pode não ser adequada e deve ser revista em hospitais e outras instituições com elevada prevalência de micro-organismos resistentes.

A glycerin hydrogel-based wound dressing prevents peristomal infections after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): a prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics, peristomal infection is the most common complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). A new glycerin hydrogel (GHG) wound dressing has been proposed to possess more effective antimicrobial properties but has not been tested in a larger trial. The aim of the study was therefore to assess the superiority of GHG regarding the incidence of peristomal wound infections during a 30-day postprocedure follow-up. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with cancer undergoing PEG were recruited from 1 university and 2 general hospitals between January 2007 and December 2008. Patients were randomized to group 1 (34 patients), which received GHG, or group 2 (34 patients), which received a traditional wound dressing. Dressing changes were done at day 1 and weeks 1, 2, and 4 (group 1) vs daily changes during week 1 and at weeks 2 and 4 (group 2). The PEG site was assessed by using 2 different infection scores. RESULTS: At the end of the first and second weeks, a statistically significant reduction of the mean infection scores was seen in patients with GHG wound dressings (first week: 1.64 ± 1.6 vs 3.12 ± 2.69, P < .008; second week: 1.37 ± 1.11 vs 2.53 ± 2.37, P < .02). After 7 days, wound reactions occurred in 14.7% in the GHG group vs 47.05% in the traditional group (p <0.005). The GHG wound dressing required 5 times less frequent dressing changes. CONCLUSION: The GHG wound dressing significantly reduces peristomal wound infections and is a convenient, cost-effective alternative for wound management following PEG.

Peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a 7-year surveillance of 297 patients.

CONTEXT: Healthcare-associated infection represents the most frequent adverse event during care delivery. Medical advances like percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy have brought improvement on quality of life to patients but an increased risk of healthcare-associated infection. Predictive risk factors for peristomal wound infection are largely unknown but evidence suggests that antibiotic prophylaxis and preventive strategies related to infection control may reduce infection rates. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim was to evaluate the global prevalence rate of peristomal infection. Secondary objectives were to characterise the positive culture results, to evaluate the prophylactic antibiotic protocol and to identify potential risk factors for peristomal infection. METHODS: Retrospective study of 297 patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy performed at a general hospital between January 2004 and September 2010. Patients received prophylactic cefazolin before the endoscopic gastrostomy procedure. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data, underling disease conditions to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and patient potential intrinsic risk factors. Statistical analysis was made with the statistical program SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: A total of 297 percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes were inserted. Wound infection occurred in 36 patients (12.1%). Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant was the most frequently isolated microorganism (33.3%) followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30.6%). The incidence rate had been rising each year and differ from 4.65% in 2004/2007 to 17.9% in 2008/2010. This finding was consistent with the increasing of prevalence global infection rates of the hospital. Most of the infections (55.6%) were detected in the first 10 days post procedure. There was no significant difference in age, body mass index values, mean survival time and duration of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding between patients with and without periostomal infection. Institutional factors, namely global prevalence infection rates and the endemic character of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant, play an important role in peristomal infection rates. Traditional antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin is not adequate due to the prevalence of resistant organisms. CONCLUSIONS: Peristomal infection is a frequent problem with clinical impact in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy patients and should be considered a healthcare associated infection. The antimicrobial prophylaxis regimens using cephalosporins are not adequate and need to be reviewed due to the high prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus methicillin resistant and other resistant organisms in hospitals and nursing homes.

Role of oxidized regenerated cellulose in preventing infections at the surgical site: prospective, randomized study in 98 patients affected by a dirty wound.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether oxidized regenerated cellulose (ORC), applied to "dirty" surgical wounds, is able to reduce the microbial load and, consequently, the infection rate as compared to conventional local wound treatment. METHODS: The study included 98 patients who underwent intestinal recanalization procedures between December 2003 and December 2008, with the stoma as the surgical site. Authors considered several risk factors for SSI. The patients were divided into two groups. In group A (50 patients), the surgical wound, previous site of the stoma, was packed with ORC, whereas in group B (48 patients) gauze soaked in iodine was used. Microbial contamination was evaluated with three swabs (in subcutaneous tissue and the dermis), in the operating room before wound packing and on the 2nd and 3rd postoperative day (before suturing the skin). RESULTS: There were no cases of wound dehiscence and no clinically evident superficial or deep surgical site infections in either group. Analysis of all data revealed that there was no or reduced bacterial contamination in the second and third swab in 33 patients (66%) of Group A versus 12 patients (25%) of Group B. CONCLUSION: Although it is necessary to consider all factors which can have an influence on SSI and use all the means shown to be effective to reduce the risk of SSI, there is a rationale for using ORC to prevent this kind of infection, especially in patients who undergo "dirty" surgery.

The buried bumper syndrome: the usefulness of retrieval PEG tubes in its management.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is a safe and easy method and carries a low mortality and complication rate. The buried bumper syndrome is a rare and late complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. An 80-year-old man with bilateral basal ganglia bleeding was unable to swallow safely and required tube feeding. A Flexiflo Inverta percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube was successfully inserted by pull technique. One year later, he was readmitted to our clinic because of nonfunctioning tube and peristomal cellulites. Endoscopy demonstrated dimpling of the gastric mucosa on the anterior wall of the stomach. Abdominal computed tomography revealed the bumper to be buried in the abdominal wall. The tube was removed by external traction, without any abdominal incision, and a different site was used for the insertion of a new percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube. No further problems were encountered over the follow-up period of nine months. As a result, the Flexiflo Inverta percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes with externally removable internal bumpers were found useful in the treatment of buried bumper syndrome, and the buried bumper was easily removed by external traction without any endoscopic or surgical methods.

Cardiac device infections complicated by erosion.

BACKGROUND: Implantation of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can be complicated by infection and device erosion. It is unclear if the clinical features of patients who have device erosion differ from those without erosion. METHODS: We retrospectively examined the records of all patients referred for explantation of a pacemaker or defibrillator from January 2000 to May 2005. We examined demographic variables including age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) as well as clinical variables related to erosion and procedural variables. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients with infected pacemakers or ICDs were identified. Of these cases, 30 (42%) developed infection complicated by erosion, of which 8/28 (29%) were related to ICDs, and 22/44 (50%) were related to pacemakers. CONCLUSIONS: Device erosion was significantly associated with the presence of a non-systemic infection as opposed to cases without erosion. This finding may have implications in the timing of device re-implantation.

High rate of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy site infections due to oropharyngeal colonization.

We prospectively analyzed peristomal infection agents during the first week following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement by the pull technique in patients with head and neck cancer. Nasal and pharyngeal swabs were obtained from a consecutive series of cancer patients prior to PEG placement. All patients underwent antibiotic prophylaxis with cefotaxime and oral disinfection. PEG site infection was prospectively evaluated at days 2, 3, and 7 after insertion. Twenty-eight patients (25 males; mean age, 58 years) were included. Oropharyngeal or nasal colonization were observed in 68% (19/28) and 19% (5/28) of patients, respectively. Early infections occurred in 36% (10/28) of the patients, all with oropharyngeal colonization and concordance between agents (P=0.01). Three patients required hospital admission and 1 required surgery. Head and neck cancer patients with oropharyngeal colonization have a high risk of early PEG site infection with substantial morbidity owing to oral-stomal spread.

Covering the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube prevents peristomal infection.

BACKGROUND: Because oropharyngeal bacteria can be brought through the abdominal wall during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), peristomal infection is one of the most frequent complications in patients who undergo the procedure. This study aimed to determine whether covering the PEG tube with a sheath that could be detached in the stomach could help prevent peristomal infection. METHODS: In three community hospitals in Japan, data from 449 patients with swallowing dysfunction were prospectively collected between March 2000 and February 2002 for non-covered PEG (n=206) and between March 2002 and February 2004 for covered PEG (n=243). RESULTS: After adjusting for hospital, age, gender, and underlying diseases, covering the PEG significantly reduced peristomal purulent infection compared with non-covered PEG (odds ratio: 0.05; 95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.13). Body temperature, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein at day 3 after PEG placement, as well as duration of antibiotics usage, were significantly lower or shorter in patients treated with covered PEG than non-covered PEG. In spite of the same frequencies in the two groups of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in oropharyngeal cultures before PEG placement, these organisms were detected significantly less frequently in peristomal lesions of patients who underwent covered PEG. Moreover, 28 patients treated with covered PEG received no antibiotic therapy, and 27 of them had no signs of peristomal infection. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that covering the PEG tube, with or without providing antibiotic therapy, may prevent peristomal infection in spite of the presence of oropharyngeal bacterial flora after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.