A Simple Method for Constructing Artificial Promoters Activated in Response to Ultrasound Stimulation.

It has been pointed out that ultrasound could be used as a controller for bioprocesses including gene expression since its energy can noninvasively reach deep in the body. Gene expression may be timely and spatially controlled by ultrasound, thus providing necessary bioactive proteins for the targeted tissue in a timely fashion. Although there are many processes involved in gene expression control, one of the most important processes is transcription, and the promoter plays an essential role in it. There are several promoters known to be activated in response to ultrasound irradiation . However, in our opinion, an artificial promoter is more suitable for clinical use. We herein describe simple methods to construct promoters that are responsive to ultrasound irradiation by randomly combining cis-elements (transcription factor binding motifs) and thereby improve its reactivity to ultrasound irradiation .

Regulation of gene expression in retrovirus vectors by X-ray and proton beam radiation with artificially constructed promoters.

BACKGROUND: We previously obtained an X-ray responsive promoter from 11 promoters that we constructed. In the present study, we aimed to determine the efficiency of our promoter construction method. In addition, the reactivity of the promoter to X-rays in vivo is also investigated. METHODS: Promoters constructed by linking the TATA box to randomly combined binding sequences of transcription factors activated by radiation were cloned to prepare a promoter library. Combinations of promoters and various genes were stably-transfected into HeLa cells to establish recombinant cell lines, which were then exposed to X-rays or a proton beam to observe gene expression enhancement with or without anti-oxidants. Tumors of luciferase-expressing recombinant cells on mice were exposed to X-rays and promoter activation was evaluated by detecting bioluminescence. As a model for in vitro suicide gene therapy, fcy::fur-expressing recombinant cells were exposed to X-rays before incubation with 5-fluorocytosin. Cell viability was determined with WST-8. RESULTS: Twenty-five of the 62 promoters in the library enhanced luciferase activity over five-fold, 6 h after receiving 10 Gy of X-ray irradiation, suggesting the effectiveness of our method. Luciferase activity in recombinant cells was enhanced by X-rays and, to a lesser extent, by a proton beam. Anti-oxidants attenuated the enhancement, suggesting the involvement of oxidative stress. Promoters were less reactive to X-rays in tumors on mice. In our suicide gene therapy model, survival of post-irradiated cells decreased dose-dependently with 5-fluorocytosin. CONCLUSIONS: Our method was efficient in generating radiation responsive promoters. Furthermore, we have successfully shown a potential therapeutic use for one of these promoters.

p53 Binding to the p21 promoter is dependent on the nature of DNA damage.

p53 Is a tumor suppressor that integrates signals from different stress induced signalling pathways, regulates cell cycle arrest, senescence, apoptosis and DNA repair. How p53 dictates cell fate is unclear. As a major transcriptional target of p53 in response to cellular stress, p21 is a key component in cell cycle control and apoptosis, directing an anti-apoptotic response following DNA damage. It is therefore likely that p53-dependent regulation of p21 contributes, at least in part, how p53 influences cellular outcome upon DNA damage. Here we compare the p53-dependent transcriptional regulation of p21 in response to DNA damage by ultraviolet (UV) radiation and ionizing radiation (IR). We demonstrate that despite comparable levels of p53 accumulation by both types of DNA damage, IR causes significant, early accumulation of p21 not seen in UV-damaged cells, with a substantially different cell cycle profile. Whereas UV and IR both target p21 protein for degradation immediately after DNA damage, differential post-damage p21 transcription is accountable for the disparity in p21 protein levels. Chromatin immunoprecipitation studies reveal that p53 displays a clear bias against the p21 promoter in UV-damaged cells compared to IR-damaged cells. We note differential post-translational modifications of nuclear p53 between UV and IR treatment. Furthermore we demonstrate that this disparity correlated with reduced histone acetylation on the TATA box within the p21 promoter following UV treatment. This suggests that the nature of DNA damage enables p53 to selectively discriminate between promoters in the induction of target genes, thereby regulating their expression and subsequent cellular outcome.