ABSTRACT
Intradermal (ID) injection of the natural tachykinins substance P (SP), neurokinin A (NKA), and neurokinin B (NKB) (0.3-30 nmol) resulted in a marked and dose-related rat paw edema, with mean ED50 values of 2.68 nmol, 1.17 nmol, and 0.80 nmol, respectively. The ID injection of the selective NK1, SP methyl-ester (1-30 nmol), NK2, [beta-Ala8]-neurokinin A4-10) (beta-Ala, 0.3-30 nmol), or NK3, senktide (1-10 nmol) agonists, caused extensive edema formation with mean ED50s of 0.48 nmol, 0.41 nmol, and 0.18 nmol, respectively. The ID injection of the selective NK1 antagonist FK888 (0.1-3 nmol) produced marked inhibition (94%, 52%, and 66%, respectively) of rat paw edema induced by SP, NKA, or SP methyl-ester. The ID co-injection of the NK2 receptor antagonist SR 48968 elicited a graded inhibition (52%, 67%, and 35%, respectively) of rat paw edema induced by NKA, beta-Ala and, to a lesser extent, the edema caused by SP. Finally, the ID co-injection of the NK, receptor antagonist SR 142801 significantly inhibited (53%, 76%, 53%, and 100%, respectively) the edema formation caused by NKB and NKA or by SP and senktide. Together, the data of the present study suggest that tachykinin-mediated rat paw edema depends on the activation of NK1, NK2 and NK3 receptor subtypes, with apparent major involvement of NK1 receptors subtypes.
Subject(s)
Edema/physiopathology , Receptors, Tachykinin/physiology , Tachykinins/toxicity , Animals , Edema/chemically induced , Male , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Receptors, Tachykinin/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
We have investigated the effects of actinomycin D on mouse ear oedema induced by capsaicin, neuropeptides, and established inflammatory mediators. Actinomycin D (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.) significantly (P < 0.01) inhibited ear oedema induced by topical application of capsaicin, while adriamycin (6.0 mg/kg, i.v.) and cycloheximide (6.0 mg/kg, i.v.) had no effect on oedema. The ear oedema induced by intradermal injection of neuropeptides such as mammalian tachykinins, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), was markedly (P < 0.05, P < 0.01 or P < 0.001) suppressed by actinomycin D. The drug was also effective (P < 0.01 or P < 0.001) in inhibiting bradykinin (BK)- and compound 48/80-induced ear oedema, but did not inhibit oedema induced by histamine, 5-HT, leukotriene C4 (LTC4), and platelet activating factor (PAF) at a dose of 1 mg/kg. In mast cell-deficient W/WV mice, actinomycin D (1.0 mg/kg, i.v.) failed to inhibit substance P (SP)-induced ear oedema whereas spantide (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.) was an effective (P < 0.01) inhibitor of oedema formation. Furthermore, actinomycin D (10-100 microM) dose-dependently prevented histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells evoked by SP, compound 48/80, and the ionophore A23182, respectively. These results strongly suggest that an inhibitory effect of actinomycin D on neurogenic inflammation is due primarily to the prevention of mast cell activation mediated by neuropeptides, rather than an interaction with DNA or receptors of neuropeptides.