ABSTRACT
The management of type 1 diabetes in infancy presents significant challenges. Hybrid closed loop systems have been shown to be effective in a research setting and are now available for clinical use. There are relatively little reported data regarding their safety and efficacy in a real world clinical setting. We report two cases of very young children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes at ages 18 (Case 1) and 7 months (Case 2), who were commenced on hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery using the CamAPS FX™ system from diagnosis. At diagnosis, total daily dose (TDD) was 6 and 3.3 units for Case 1 and 2, respectively. Closed loop was started during the inpatient stay and weekly follow up was provided via video call on discharge. Seven months from diagnosis, Case 1 has an HbA1C of 49 mmol/mol, 61% time in range (TIR, 3.9-10 mmol/L) with 2% time in hypoglycemia (<3.9 mmol/L) with no incidents of very low blood glucose (BG; <3 mmol/L, 54 mg/dL) over 6 months. Given the extremely small TDD of insulin in Case 2, we elected to use diluted insulin (insulin aspart injection, NovoLog, Novo Nordisk Inc., Plainsboro, NJ, Diluting Medium for NovoLog®). Six months from diagnosis, the estimated HbA1c is 50 mmol/mol, TIR 76% with 1% hypoglycemia and no incidents of very low BG (<3 mmol/L, 54 mg/dL) over 6 months. We conclude that the use hybrid closed-loop can be safe and effective from diagnosis in children under 2 years of age with type 1 diabetes.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Teach-Back Communication/methods , Blood Glucose/drug effects , Cross-Over Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Infant , Insulin/administration & dosage , Insulin/therapeutic use , Male , Teach-Back Communication/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
In this study, we examined the effectiveness of a self-management intervention delivered to people with heart failure in Vietnam. It used teach-back, a cyclical method of teaching content, checking comprehension, and re-teaching to improve understanding. A single-site cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted, and six hospital wards were randomized into two study groups. On the basis of ward allocation, 140 participants received either usual care or the teach-back heart failure self-management intervention plus usual care. The intervention involved, prior to discharge, an individual educational session on heart failure self-care, with understanding reinforced using teach-back, a heart failure booklet, weighing scales, diary, and a follow-up phone call 2 weeks post-discharge. The control group received usual care and the booklet. Outcomes were heart failure knowledge, self-care (maintenance, management and confidence), and all-cause hospitalizations assessed at 1 and 3 months (end-point). Upon completion of the study, the intervention group had significantly greater knowledge and self-care maintenance than the control group. Other outcomes did not differ between the two groups. The teach-back self-management intervention demonstrated promising benefits in promoting self-care for heart failure patients.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Self-Management/methods , Teach-Back Communication/standards , Adult , Aged , Cluster Analysis , Female , Heart Failure/psychology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/methods , Self-Management/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teach-Back Communication/methods , Teach-Back Communication/statistics & numerical data , VietnamABSTRACT
Health care professionals use teach-back to foster adherence to treatment recommendations and to improve safety and quality of care. This improvement project, conducted in one division of a home care agency, used a pretest-posttest design with an interprofessional group of hospice home care clinicians to incorporate teach-back into home visits to evaluate if the use of teach-back enhanced caregiver and patient-provider communication, improved caregivers' confidence in caring for hospice home care patients, and decreased hospitalizations. After the intervention, the teach-back group had zero hospitalizations compared with 2 for the non-teach-back group (0% and 1.97%, respectively), and patient-caregiver "confidence" increased from 58% to 81%, pre to post intervention. In conclusion, teach-back is a cost-effective teaching methodology that can be implemented by any discipline to improve patient-provider communication and patient outcomes.
