Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 106
Filter
1.
Molecules ; 27(15)2022 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35956791

ABSTRACT

The release of the FDA's guidance on Process Analytical Technology has motivated and supported the pharmaceutical industry to deliver consistent quality medicine by acquiring a deeper understanding of the product performance and process interplay. The technical opportunities to reach this high-level control have considerably evolved since 2004 due to the development of advanced analytical sensors and chemometric tools. However, their transfer to the highly regulated pharmaceutical sector has been limited. To this respect, data fusion strategies have been extensively applied in different sectors, such as food or chemical, to provide a more robust performance of the analytical platforms. This survey evaluates the challenges and opportunities of implementing data fusion within the PAT concept by identifying transfer opportunities from other sectors. Special attention is given to the data types available from pharmaceutical manufacturing and their compatibility with data fusion strategies. Furthermore, the integration into Pharma 4.0 is discussed.


Subject(s)
Drug Industry , Technology, Pharmaceutical , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Pharmaceutical Preparations/standards , Quality Control , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
2.
Health Secur ; 18(3): 241-249, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32348165

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic is a stark reminder of the heavy toll that emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) with epidemic and pandemic potential can inflict. Vaccine development, scale-up, and commercialization is a long, expensive, and risky enterprise that requires substantial upfront planning and offers no guarantee of success. EIDs are a particularly challenging target for global health preparedness, including for vaccine development. Insufficient attention has been given to challenges, lessons learned, and potential solutions to support and sustain vaccine industry engagement in vaccine development for EIDs. Drawing from lessons from the most recent Ebola epidemic in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, as well as the 2009 H1N1 influenza, 2014-2016 Ebola, and 2015-16 Zika outbreaks preceding it, we offer our perspective on challenges facing EID vaccine development and recommend additional solutions to prioritize in the near term. The 6 recommendations focus on reducing vaccine development timelines and increasing business certainty to reduce risks for companies. The global health security community has an opportunity to build on the current momentum to design a sustainable model for EID vaccines.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Global Health , Influenza Vaccines/pharmacology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Drug Approval , Drug Development , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Female , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Needs Assessment , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Public Health , Security Measures
3.
J Microbiol Biotechnol ; 29(10): 1495-1505, 2019 Oct 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31434364

ABSTRACT

The Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC) is capable of remaining viable in low-nutrient environments and harsh conditions, posing a contamination risk in non-sterile pharmaceutical products as well as a challenge for detection. To develop optimal recovery methods to detect BCC, three oligotrophic media were evaluated and compared with nutrient media for the recovery of BCC from autoclaved distilled water or antiseptic solutions. Serial dilutions (10-1 to 10-12 CFU/ml) of 20 BCC strains were inoculated into autoclaved distilled water and stored at 6°C, 23°C and 42°C for 42 days. Six suspensions of Burkholderia cenocepacia were used to inoculate aqueous solutions containing 5 µg/ml and 50 µg/ml chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) and 10 µg/ml benzalkonium chloride (BZK), and stored at 23°C for a further 199 days. Nutrient media such as Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) or Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB), oligotrophic media (1/10 strength TSA or TSB, Reasoner's 2nd Agar [R2A] or Reasoner's 2nd Broth [R2AB], and 1/3 strength R2A or R2AB) were compared by inoculating these media with BCC from autoclaved distilled water and from antiseptic samples. The recovery of BCC in water or antiseptics was higher in culture broth than on solid media. Oligotrophic medium showed a higher recovery efficiency than TSA or TSB for the detection of 20 BCC samples. Results from multiple comparisons allowed us to directly identify significant differences between TSA or TSB and oligotrophic media. An oligotrophic medium pre-enrichment resuscitation step is offered for the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) proposed compendial test method for BCC detection.


Subject(s)
Bacteriological Techniques/methods , Burkholderia cepacia complex/isolation & purification , Culture Media/chemistry , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Temperature , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Burkholderia cepacia complex/drug effects , Burkholderia cepacia complex/growth & development , Microbial Viability/drug effects , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Water Microbiology
4.
Yakugaku Zasshi ; 139(3): 411-414, 2019.
Article in Japanese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30828020

ABSTRACT

The Academy of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Japan (APSTJ) has contributed to advances in pharmaceutical sciences and progress in formulation technologies. The APSTJ has some 2000 individual members including pharmacists, researchers, technologists, and representatives of regulatory authorities. Remarkably, more than 800 individual members are from the industry. The APSTJ holds an annual meeting and several conferences or seminars on pharmaceutical technologies and skills. It has also set up 13 focus groups (FGs), including some working energetically on medical pharmacy research. For example, the FG on "personalized formulations" aims to develop a suitable dosage form for each individual patient to confirm the concept of personalized medication. To provide opportunities to hear the voices of patients and understand their medical needs, another FG has started a hospital-based internship program for industrial researchers. Furthermore, as an activity of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, an industry-university joint consortium for "pediatric drug formulations" was organized within an FG to develop suitable formulations for pediatric use. The mission of the APSTJ is to provide safe, effective, user-friendly drug products based on pharmaceutical science and technology and cooperation with clinical researchers and medical staff.


Subject(s)
Biopharmaceutics/organization & administration , Societies, Scientific/organization & administration , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Biopharmaceutics/trends , Dosage Forms , Drug Compounding , Focus Groups , Internship and Residency , Japan , Pediatrics , Precision Medicine , Technology, Pharmaceutical/trends
5.
Int J Pharm Pract ; 26(4): 364-368, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29732641

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), limited availability, substandard quality and high prices of pharmaceutical products lead to lack of access to essential medicines and poor health outcomes. Manufacturing pharmaceuticals in LMICs may improve access for patients while increasing the market size for manufacturers. METHODS: We present a tool for assessment of local manufacturing feasibility of pharmaceuticals, intended for use among key stakeholders during the business development process. The tool consists of five domains: product selection and capacity, market sizing, market entry, funding and quality assurance. KEY FINDINGS: The tool is intended to identify barriers and facilitators for local manufacturing and provide a roadmap for decision-making across multiple stakeholders. A case study in Namibia identified key barriers and facilitators to successful manufacturing in that county. CONCLUSIONS: Careful consideration of feasibility and potential for success may lead to improved health for the populations of LMIC as well as significant market potential for pharmaceutical manufacturers.


Subject(s)
Decision Making, Organizational , Developing Countries , Drug Costs , Drugs, Essential/economics , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Decision Support Techniques , Feasibility Studies , Health Care Sector/organization & administration , Humans , Technology, Pharmaceutical/economics
6.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 75(7): 465-472, 2018 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29572315

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Various incremental and disruptive healthcare innovations that are occurring or may occur are discussed, with insights on how multihospital health systems can prepare for the future and optimize the continuity of patient care provided. SUMMARY: Innovation in patient care is occurring at an ever-increasing rate, and this is especially true relative to the transition of patients through the care continuum. Health systems must leverage their ability to standardize and develop electronic health record (EHR) systems and other infrastructure necessary to support patient care and optimize outcomes; examples include 3D printing of patient-specific medication dosage forms to enhance precision medicine, the use of drones for medication delivery, and the expansion of telehealth capabilities to improve patient access to the services of pharmacists and other healthcare team members. Disruptive innovations in pharmacy services and delivery will alter how medications are prescribed and delivered to patients now and in the future. Further, technology may also fundamentally alter how and where pharmacists and pharmacy technicians care for patients. This article explores the various innovations that are occurring and that will likely occur in the future, particularly as they apply to multihospital health systems and patient continuity of care. CONCLUSION: Pharmacy departments that anticipate and are prepared to adapt to incremental and disruptive innovations can demonstrate value in the multihospital health system through strategies such as optimizing the EHR, identifying telehealth opportunities, supporting infrastructure, and integrating services.


Subject(s)
Diffusion of Innovation , Multi-Institutional Systems/organization & administration , Patient Care/methods , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Electronic Health Records , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Pharmacists/organization & administration , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Telemedicine/organization & administration
7.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 75(7): 473-481, 2018 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29572316

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The considerations that leaders of multihospital health systems must take into account in developing and implementing initiatives to build and maintain an exceptional pharmacy workforce are described. SUMMARY: Significant changes that require constant individual and organizational learning are occurring throughout healthcare and within the profession of pharmacy. These considerations include understanding why it is important to have a succession plan and determining what types of education and training are important to support that plan. Other considerations include strategies for leveraging learners, dealing with a large geographic footprint, adjusting training opportunities to accommodate the ever-evolving demands on pharmacy staffs in terms of skill mix, and determining ways to either budget for or internally develop content for staff development. All of these methods are critically important to ensuring an optimized workforce. Especially for large health systems operating multiple sites across large distances, the use of technology-enabled solutions to provide effective delivery of programming to multiple sites is critical. Commonly used tools include live webinars, live "telepresence" programs, prerecorded programming that is available through an on-demand repository, and computer-based training modules. A learning management system is helpful to assign and document completion of educational requirements, especially those related to regulatory requirements (e.g., controlled substances management, sterile and nonsterile compounding, competency assessment). CONCLUSION: Creating and sustaining an environment where all pharmacy caregivers feel invested in and connected to ongoing learning is a powerful motivator for performance, engagement, and retention.


Subject(s)
Learning , Multi-Institutional Systems/organization & administration , Pharmacy Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Workforce , Clinical Competence , Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Humans , Leadership , Staff Development/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration
8.
J Pharm Biomed Anal ; 151: 317-323, 2018 Mar 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29413980

ABSTRACT

The IgG activities of antigen recognition, Fc-mediated complement activation and cellular Fcγ-receptors (FcγRs) binding are critical for intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) immunotherapy in a variety of immune deficiency diseases. Further, these activities could be influenced by different plasma sources and the IVIg manufacturing processes of different manufacturers. This study evaluated and compared the biological activities of IgG in 7 IVIg preparations produced by different Chinese manufacturers. By using ELISA and two-dimensional immunoblotting, the binding capacity and antibody repertoire of IVIg against typical pathogenic antigens were investigated. Further, Fc-mediated complement activation and receptor binding activities were measured by the haemolysis method and flow-cytometric assay respectively. The results showed that all of the preparations tested have a broad spectrum of antibodies against the E. coli O157:H7 proteome, and each IVIg has its own distinct antibody repertoire. Compared to the European Pharmacopoeia IgG standard, the mean indices of the pathogenic antigen binding capacity, complement activation activity and FcγRs binding activity in Chinese preparations were 152%, 143% and 87%. The biological activities varied widely among the 7 IVIg preparations, and no significant differences were observed between the different batches of most IVIgs from the same manufacturer. This study will contribute to the improvement of the IVIg product quality evaluation system and an increased understanding of the variety of IgG biological activities in Chinese IVIg preparations.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Escherichia coli/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/pharmacology , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/pharmacology , Receptors, IgG/metabolism , Cell Line , China , Complement Activation/drug effects , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/immunology , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/drug therapy , Quality Improvement , Reference Standards , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Technology, Pharmaceutical/standards
9.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 103(1): 27-31, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29143971

ABSTRACT

Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies routinely use biomarkers to obtain quantitative metrics for drug exposure, efficacy, and safety and to inform clinical trial design with regard to patient selection, treatments, and outcomes. Biomarker science has the unique capability to catalyze precompetitive collaborations between academia, industry, regulatory agencies, and other stakeholders with the ultimate goal of accelerating the delivery of safe and effective medicines to patients, particularly in areas of high unmet need.


Subject(s)
Biotechnology , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Drug Industry , Technology, Pharmaceutical , Biomarkers/analysis , Biotechnology/methods , Biotechnology/organization & administration , Drug Industry/methods , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration
10.
Curr Pharm Teach Learn ; 9(4): 511-520, 2017 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29233422

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: A key element for pharmacy practice defined by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) is medication use systems management. A web-based community pharmacy simulation originally created for Australian pharmacy students was adapted for pharmacy students in the United States (US). The objective of this study was to collaboratively adapt an existing international simulation program for utility in the US and measure student perceptions of a web-based community pharmacy simulation program in three US schools of pharmacy. METHODS: An Australian development team in collaboration with US pharmacy school faculty modified the existing MyDispense software to create a virtual environment that accurately represented US community pharmacy practice. Students at three US schools of pharmacy used the newly adapted version of MyDispense and were surveyed on their prior experience in community pharmacy and their perceptions of MyDispense as a learning tool. RESULTS: Overall 241 (44%) students completed the satisfaction survey. Approximately 40% of these students worked in a community pharmacy before starting pharmacy school. Most students agreed or strongly agreed that MyDispense was straightforward to learn (76%), was more realistic than addressing similar paper cases (73%), and offered a learning opportunity to safely make errors (84%). Qualitative thematic analysis revealed that MyDispense allowed students to practice how to gather patient information and ask appropriate questions, counsel patients, and practice the dispensing process. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Response to the US version of My Dispense is positive and proves to be a viable option for introducing and reinforcing community pharmacy practice skills to students during in their pharmacy education.


Subject(s)
Education, Pharmacy/methods , Medication Systems/statistics & numerical data , Simulation Training/methods , Curriculum/trends , Education, Pharmacy/standards , Equipment Design/standards , Humans , Problem-Based Learning/methods , Problem-Based Learning/standards , Software Design , Surveys and Questionnaires , Technology, Pharmaceutical/instrumentation , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , United States
11.
Vaccine ; 35(23): 3041-3049, 2017 05 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28465097

ABSTRACT

Post-authorisation safety studies (PASS) of vaccines assess or quantify the risk of adverse events following immunisation that were not identified or could not be estimated pre-licensure. The aim of this perspective paper is to describe the authors' experience in the design and conduct of twelve PASS that contributed to the evaluation of the benefit-risk of vaccines in real-world settings. We describe challenges and learnings from selected PASS of rotavirus, malaria, influenza, human papillomavirus and measles-mumps-rubella-varicella vaccines that assessed or identified potential or theoretical risks, which may lead to changes to risk management plans and/or to label updates. Study settings include the use of large healthcare databases and de novo data collection. PASS methodology is influenced by the background incidence of the outcome of interest, vaccine uptake, availability and quality of data sources, identification of the at-risk population and of suitable comparators, availability of validated case definitions, and the frequent need for case ascertainment in large databases. Challenges include the requirement for valid exposure and outcome data, identification of, and access to, adequate data sources, and mitigating limitations including bias and confounding. Assessing feasibility is becoming a key step to confirm that study objectives can be met in a timely manner. PASS provide critical information for regulators, public health agencies, vaccine manufacturers and ultimately, individuals. Collaborative approaches and synergistic efforts between vaccine manufacturers and key stakeholders, such as regulatory and public health agencies, are needed to facilitate access to data, and to drive optimal study design and implementation, with the aim of generating robust evidence.


Subject(s)
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Technology, Pharmaceutical/legislation & jurisprudence , Vaccines/adverse effects , Chickenpox Vaccine/adverse effects , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/adverse effects , Malaria Vaccines/adverse effects , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/adverse effects , Papillomavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Rotavirus Vaccines/adverse effects , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Vaccination , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated , Vaccines, Combined/adverse effects
12.
Int J Pharm ; 516(1-2): 144-157, 2017 Jan 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27838294

ABSTRACT

Manufacturing is the bridge between research and patient: without product, there is no clinical outcome. Shortage has a variety of causes, in this paper we analyse only causes related to manufacturing technology and we use shortage as a paradigm highliting the relevance of Pharmaceutical Technology. Product and process complexity and capacity issues are the main challenge for the Pharmaceutical Industry Supply chain. Manufacturing Technology should be acknowledged as a R&D step and as a very important matter during University degree in Pharmacy and related disciplines, promoting collaboration between Academia and Industry, measured during HTA step and rewarded in terms of price and reimbursement. The above elements are not yet properly recognised, and manufacturing technology is taken in to consideration only when a shortage is in place. In a previous work, Panzitta et al. proposed to perform a full technology assessment at the Health Technological Assessment stage, evaluating three main technical aspects of a medicine: manufacturing process, physicochemical properties, and formulation characteristics. In this paper, we develop the concept of manufacturing appraisal, providing a technical overview of upcoming challenges, a risk based approach and an economic picture of shortage costs. We develop also an overall quality concept, not limited to GMP factors but broaden to all elements leading to a robust supply and promoting technical innovation.


Subject(s)
Drug Industry/organization & administration , Pharmaceutical Preparations/supply & distribution , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Cooperative Behavior , Drug Industry/economics , Drug Industry/standards , Humans , Pharmaceutical Preparations/economics , Research/organization & administration , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/standards
14.
Cad Saude Publica ; 32Suppl 2(Suppl 2): e00037415, 2016 Nov 03.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27828672

ABSTRACT

This article discusses the relations between healthcare systems and the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on state support for pharmaceutical innovation. The study highlights the experiences of the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany, developed countries and paradigms of modern health systems (liberal, universal, and corporatist), in addition to Japan, a case of successful catching up. The study also emphasizes the experiences of China, India, and Brazil, large developing countries that have tried different catching up strategies, with diverse histories and profiles in their healthcare systems and pharmaceutical industries. Finally, with a focus on state forms of support for health research, the article addresses the mechanisms for linkage between health systems and the pharmaceutical industry, evaluating the possibilities of Brazil strengthening a virtuous interaction, favoring the expansion and consolidation of the Brazilian health system - universal but segmented ‒ and the affirmation of the innovative national pharmaceutical industry. Resumo: O artigo discute as relações entre os sistemas de saúde e a indústria farmacêutica, concentrando-se no apoio do Estado à inovação farmacêutica. Salienta as trajetórias dos Estados Unidos, Reino Unido e Alemanha, países desenvolvidos, paradigmáticos dos modernos sistemas de saúde (liberais, universais e corporativos), além do Japão, um caso de emparelhamento bem-sucedido. Também enfatiza as trajetórias de China, Índia e Brasil, países em desenvolvimento, extensos, que experimentaram diferentes estratégias de emparelhamento, dispondo de sistemas de saúde e indústrias farmacêuticas com trajetórias e perfis diversos. Finalmente, com foco nas formas estatais de apoio à pesquisa em saúde, considera os mecanismos de conexão entre os sistemas de saúde e a indústria farmacêutica, avaliando as possibilidades, no Brasil, de fortalecer uma interação virtuosa que favoreça a expansão e consolidação do sistema de saúde brasileiro - universal, conquanto segmentado ‒ e a afirmação da indústria farmacêutica nacional inovadora.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care , Drug Discovery , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Health Policy , Organizational Innovation , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Humans
15.
Vaccine ; 34(45): 5425-5429, 2016 10 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27614783

ABSTRACT

Through its Global Action Plan for Influenza Vaccines (GAP), the World Health Organization (WHO) in collaboration with the United States Department of Health and Human Services has produced a checklist to support policy-makers and influenza vaccine manufacturers in identifying key technological, political, financial, and logistical issues affecting the sustainability of influenza vaccine production. This checklist highlights actions in five key areas that are beneficial for establishing successful local vaccine manufacturing. These five areas comprise: (1) the policy environment and health-care systems; (2) surveillance systems and influenza evidence; (3) product development and manufacturing; (4) product approval and regulation; and (5) communication to support influenza vaccination. Incorporating the checklist into national vaccine production programmes has identified the policy gaps and next steps for countries involved in GAP's Technology Transfer Initiative. Lessons learnt from country experiences provide context and insight that complement the checklist's goal of simplifying the complexities of influenza prevention, preparedness, and vaccine manufacturing.


Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Influenza Vaccines/supply & distribution , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Technology Transfer , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Drug Industry/economics , Government Programs/economics , Government Programs/organization & administration , Humans , Program Evaluation , Public Health , Technology, Pharmaceutical/economics , Technology, Pharmaceutical/legislation & jurisprudence , United States , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services , Vaccination , World Health Organization
16.
Vaccine ; 34(45): 5430-5435, 2016 10 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27484011

ABSTRACT

With the support of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services, PATH has contributed to the World Health Organization's (WHO's) Global Action Plan for Influenza Vaccines (GAP) by providing technical and clinical assistance to several developing country vaccine manufacturers (DCVMs). GAP builds regionally based independent and sustainable influenza vaccine production capacity to mitigate the overall global shortage of influenza vaccines. The program also ensures adequate influenza vaccine manufacturing capacity in the event of an influenza pandemic. Since 2009, PATH has worked closely with two DCVMs in Vietnam: the Institute of Vaccines and Medical Biologicals (IVAC) and VABIOTECH. Beginning in 2013, PATH also began working with Torlak Institute in Serbia; Instituto Butantan in Brazil; Serum Institute of India Private Ltd. in India; and Changchun BCHT Biotechnology Co. (BCHT) in China. The DCVMs supported under the GAP program all had existing influenza vaccine manufacturing capability and required technical support from PATH to improve vaccine yield, process efficiency, and product formulation. PATH has provided customized technical support for the manufacturing process to each DCVM based on their respective requirements. Additionally, PATH, working with BARDA and WHO, supported several DCVMs in the clinical development of influenza vaccine candidates progressing toward national licensure or WHO prequalification. As a result of the activities outlined in this review, several companies were able to make excellent progress in developing state-of-the-art manufacturing processes and completing early phase clinical trials. Licensure trials are currently ongoing or planned for several DCVMs.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines/chemistry , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Pandemics/prevention & control , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Clinical Trials as Topic , Developing Countries , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/standards , Influenza Vaccines/supply & distribution , Quality Control , Technology, Pharmaceutical/trends , United States , United States Dept. of Health and Human Services , World Health Organization
17.
Am J Manag Care ; 22(16 Suppl): S487-S495, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28719222

ABSTRACT

Drug manufacturers may employ various life-cycle management patent strategies, which may impact managed care decision making regarding formulary planning and management strategies when single-source, branded oral pharmaceutical products move to generic status. Passage of the Hatch-Waxman Act enabled more rapid access to generic medications through the abbreviated new drug application process. Patent expirations of small-molecule medications and approvals of generic versions have led to substantial cost savings for health plans, government programs, insurers, pharmacy benefits managers, and their customers. However, considering that the cost of developing a single medication is estimated at $2.6 billion (2013 dollars), pharmaceutical patent protection enables companies to recoup investments, creating an incentive for innovation. Under current law, patent protection holds for 20 years from time of patent filing, although much of this time is spent in product development and regulatory review, leaving an effective remaining patent life of 7 to 10 years at the time of approval. To extend the product life cycle, drug manufacturers may develop variations of originator products and file for patents on isomers, metabolites, prodrugs, new drug formulations (eg, extended-release versions), and fixed-dose combinations. These additional patents and the complexities surrounding the timing of generic availability create challenges for managed care stakeholders attempting to gauge when generics may enter the market. An understanding of pharmaceutical patents and how intellectual property protection may be extended would benefit managed care stakeholders and help inform decisions regarding benefit management.


Subject(s)
Drug Approval/economics , Drug Approval/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Formularies, Hospital as Topic , Patents as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Drug Costs , Drug Industry/economics , Drug Industry/legislation & jurisprudence , Drugs, Generic/economics , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , United States , United States Food and Drug Administration
18.
Cad. Saúde Pública (Online) ; 32(supl.2): e00037415, 2016. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-798199

ABSTRACT

Abstract: This article discusses the relations between healthcare systems and the pharmaceutical industry, focusing on state support for pharmaceutical innovation. The study highlights the experiences of the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany, developed countries and paradigms of modern health systems (liberal, universal, and corporatist), in addition to Japan, a case of successful catching up. The study also emphasizes the experiences of China, India, and Brazil, large developing countries that have tried different catching up strategies, with diverse histories and profiles in their healthcare systems and pharmaceutical industries. Finally, with a focus on state forms of support for health research, the article addresses the mechanisms for linkage between health systems and the pharmaceutical industry, evaluating the possibilities of Brazil strengthening a virtuous interaction, favoring the expansion and consolidation of the Brazilian health system - universal but segmented ‒ and the affirmation of the innovative national pharmaceutical industry.


Resumen: El artículo discute las relaciones entre los sistemas de salud y la industria farmacéutica, concentrándose en el apoyo del Estado a la innovación farmacéutica. Resalta las trayectorias de los Estados Unidos, Reino Unido y Alemania, países desarrollados, paradigmáticos de los modernos sistemas de salud (liberales, universales y corporativos), además de Japón, un caso de emparejamiento exitoso. También enfatiza las trayectorias de China, India y Brasil, países en desarrollo, extensos, que experimentaron diferentes estrategias de emparejamiento en este ámbito, disponiendo de sistemas de salud e industrias farmacéuticas con trayectorias y perfiles diversos. Finalmente, centrándose en las formas estatales de apoyo a la investigación en salud, se consideran los mecanismos de conexión entre los sistemas de salud y la industria farmacéutica, evaluando las posibilidades, en Brasil, de fortalecer una interacción virtuosa que favorezca la expansión y consolidación del sistema de salud brasileño -universal, pese a estar segmentado-, y la consolidación de la industria farmacéutica nacional innovadora.


Resumo: O artigo discute as relações entre os sistemas de saúde e a indústria farmacêutica, concentrando-se no apoio do Estado à inovação farmacêutica. Salienta as trajetórias dos Estados Unidos, Reino Unido e Alemanha, países desenvolvidos, paradigmáticos dos modernos sistemas de saúde (liberais, universais e corporativos), além do Japão, um caso de emparelhamento bem-sucedido. Também enfatiza as trajetórias de China, Índia e Brasil, países em desenvolvimento, extensos, que experimentaram diferentes estratégias de emparelhamento, dispondo de sistemas de saúde e indústrias farmacêuticas com trajetórias e perfis diversos. Finalmente, com foco nas formas estatais de apoio à pesquisa em saúde, considera os mecanismos de conexão entre os sistemas de saúde e a indústria farmacêutica, avaliando as possibilidades, no Brasil, de fortalecer uma interação virtuosa que favoreça a expansão e consolidação do sistema de saúde brasileiro - universal, conquanto segmentado ‒ e a afirmação da indústria farmacêutica nacional inovadora.


Subject(s)
Humans , Organizational Innovation , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care , Drug Industry/organization & administration , Drug Discovery , Health Policy
19.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61 Suppl 5: S396-403, 2015 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26553666

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2001, the Meningitis Vaccine Project (MVP) was tasked to develop, test, license, and introduce a group A meningococcal (MenA) conjugate vaccine for sub-Saharan Africa. African public health officials emphasized that a vaccine price of less than US$0.50 per dose was necessary to ensure introduction and sustained use of this new vaccine. METHODS: Initially, MVP envisioned partnering with a multinational vaccine manufacturer, but the target price and opportunity costs were problematic and formal negotiations ended in 2002. MVP chose to become a "virtual vaccine company," and over the next decade managed a network of public-private and public-public partnerships for pharmaceutical development, clinical development, and regulatory submission. MVP supported the transfer of key know-how for the production of group A polysaccharide and a new conjugation method to the Serum Institute of India, Ltd, based in Pune, India. A robust staff structure supported by technical consultants and overseen by advisory groups in Europe and Africa ensured that the MenA conjugate vaccine would meet all international standards. RESULTS: A robust project structure including a team of technical consultants and 3 advisory groups in Europe and Africa ensured that the MenA conjugate vaccine (PsA-TT, MenAfriVac) was licensed by the Drug Controller General of India and prequalified by the World Health Organization in June 2010. The vaccine was introduced in Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger in December 2010. CONCLUSIONS: The development, through a public-private partnership, of a safe, effective, and affordable vaccine for sub-Saharan Africa, PsA-TT, offers a new paradigm for the development of vaccines specifically targeting populations in resource-poor countries.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Vaccines/immunology , Meningococcal Vaccines/isolation & purification , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Africa South of the Sahara/epidemiology , Humans , India , International Cooperation , Public-Private Sector Partnerships , Technology Transfer , World Health Organization
20.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61 Suppl 5: S483-8, 2015 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26553678

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2002, the Meningitis Vaccine Project (MVP) chose the Serum Institute of India, Ltd (SIIL), as its manufacturing partner to establish a product development partnership (PDP) with the Meningitis Vaccine Project (MVP). MVP was a collaboration between PATH and the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop meningococcal conjugate vaccines for sub-Saharan Africa. METHOD: From the outset, SIIL recognized that a partnership with MVP carried some risk but also offered important opportunities for accessing new conjugate vaccine technology and know-how. Over 3 years, SIIL successfully accepted technology transfer for the group A meningococcal polysaccharide from SynCo Bio Partners and a conjugation method from the US Food and Drug Administration. RESULTS: SIIL successfully scaled up production of a group A meningococcal conjugate vaccine that used SIIL tetanus toxoid as the carrier protein. Phase 1 studies began in India in 2005, followed by phase 2/3 studies in Africa and India. A regulatory dossier was submitted to the Indian authorities in April 2009 and WHO in September 2009. Export license was granted in December 2009, and WHO prequalification was obtained in June 2010. Vaccine was introduced at public scale in Burkina Faso that December. The group A meningococcal conjugate vaccine was named MenAfriVac, and is the first internationally qualified vaccine developed outside of big pharma. CONCLUSIONS: The project proved to be a sound investment for SIIL and is a concrete example of the potential for PDPs to provide needed products for resource-poor countries.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Vaccines/immunology , Meningococcal Vaccines/isolation & purification , Technology, Pharmaceutical/methods , Technology, Pharmaceutical/organization & administration , Humans , India , International Cooperation , Technology Transfer , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...