Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Appl Ergon ; 108: 103952, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36493677

ABSTRACT

This systematic review updates a previous systematic review on work-related physical and psychosocial risk factors for elbow disorders. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central and PsycINFO were searched for studies on associations between work-related physical or psychosocial risk factors and the occurrence of elbow disorders. Two independent reviewers selected eligible studies and assessed risk of bias (RoB). Results of studies were synthesized narratively. We identified 17 new studies and lateral epicondylitis was the most studied disorder (13 studies). Five studies had a prospective cohort design, eight were cross-sectional and four were case-control. Only one study had no items rated as high RoB. Combined physical exposure indicators (e.g. physical exertion combined with elbow movement) were associated with the occurrence of lateral epicondylitis. No other consistent associations were observed for other physical and psychosocial exposures. These results prevent strong conclusions regarding associations between work-related exposures, and the occurrence of elbow disorders.


Subject(s)
Elbow Joint , Occupational Diseases , Tennis Elbow , Humans , Elbow , Tennis Elbow/etiology , Tennis Elbow/epidemiology , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Prospective Studies , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology
2.
J Orthop Res ; 38(12): 2601-2607, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32761913

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to perform the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire to Spanish language and evaluate its reliability and validity. The translation and cultural adaptation into Spanish was done in accordance with the published guidelines. One-hundred fifty Spanish-speaking patients with unilateral chronic lateral epicondylalgia competed the questionnaire. Test-retest reliability was established by the intraclass correlation coefficient. Internal consistency was established with Cronbach's α. To establish convergent validity, we used the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire using the Spearman's correlation coefficient. Error estimation in the measurements was calculated with the standard error of measurement. Our results showed a high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .96) and high test-retest reliability (intraclass coefficient = .9; .89-.94; P < .001). The Spearman's correlation coefficient (r = .765; P < .001) showed a good relationship between the Spanish version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire. The standard error of measurement (11.9%) showed little variability of measurements. In conclusion, the Spanish version of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire is a valid and reliable tool that can be used to assess lateral epicondylalgia in Spanish-speaking individuals in order to implement the best treatment and reduce time with pain and disability.


Subject(s)
Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Translating
3.
Yonsei Med J ; 59(5): 669-676, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29869465

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders (UEMDs), such as rotator cuff tear, epicondylitis, and hand osteoarthritis, have a negative impact on quality of life (QOL). In this study, we evaluated the prevalence of rotator cuff tear, lateral and medial epicondylitis, and hand osteoarthritis in the dominant side and the impact of these UEMDs on the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) outcome measure, which assesses upper extremity-related QOL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 2013-2015, 987 participants from rural areas completed a questionnaire and underwent physical examinations, laboratory tests, simple radiographic evaluations of bilateral upper extremities, and magnetic resonance imaging studies of bilateral shoulders. Based on data from these participants, researchers evaluated DASH and performed a functional assessment of each region of the dominant side and related UEMDs. RESULTS: The prevalences of epicondylitis, rotator cuff tear, and hand osteoarthritis were 33.7%, 53.4%, and 44.6%, respectively. Univariate regression analysis results revealed that epicondylitis, epicondylitis+rotator cuff tear, epicondylitis+hand osteoarthritis, and epicondylitis+rotator cuff tear+hand osteoarthritis were significantly associated with DASH score. Multiple regression analysis, including DASH, UEMD, and regional functional assessments, showed that only epicondylitis and epicondylitis+rotator cuff tear were associated with DASH score. CONCLUSION: Epicondylitis significantly affected QOL, while other UEMDs, such as hand osteoarthritis and rotator cuff tear, had no significant impact. When a patient's QOL is affected by a UEMD, there is an increased possibility of the simultaneous presence of other UEMDs.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Rotator Cuff Injuries/epidemiology , Tennis Elbow/epidemiology , Upper Extremity/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Diseases/psychology , Osteoarthritis/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis/psychology , Physical Therapy Modalities , Prevalence , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Rotator Cuff , Rotator Cuff Injuries/physiopathology , Rotator Cuff Injuries/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennis Elbow/psychology
4.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 27(3): 387-392, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29433642

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The etiology of tennis elbow is multifactorial. Overuse of the wrist extensors along with anatomic factors, such as flexibility problems, aging, and poor blood circulation, may play a role. This study investigated whether patients with tennis elbow have a different psychological profile compared with healthy controls. METHODS: Patients with clinical signs of tennis elbow, consulting at the Ghent University Hospital between September 2015 and January 2017, were offered a paper-and-pencil questionnaire about Big Five personality traits, perfectionism, anxiety, depression, work satisfaction, and working conditions. Healthy controls in the same risk group were offered the same questionnaires. RESULTS: We recruited 69 patients (35 men, 34 women) and 100 controls (44 men, 56 women). Tennis elbow patients scored significantly lower on the personality traits extraversion and agreeableness. Men, in particular, scored significantly higher on perfectionism and were more likely to develop an anxiety disorder or a depression. Concerning work, patients indicated a significantly higher workload (especially men) and a significantly lower autonomy (especially women). Female patients also indicated less contact with colleagues. However, work satisfaction was relatively high in both groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that there is a relationship between complaints related to tennis elbow and psychological characteristics.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Belgium/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tennis Elbow/complications
5.
Br J Sports Med ; 51(9): 743-748, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27852585

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Fear, anxiety, depression, distress and catastrophisation are all factors known to affect pain and disability levels. To date, the association of such psychological factors has yet to be established in tendinopathy. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to determine if psychological variables are associated with tendinopathy and whether any such variables may be associated with pain and disability outcomes in conservative management of tendinopathy. DESIGN: A systematic review was undertaken and included studies were appraised for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Owing to heterogeneity of studies, a qualitative synthesis was undertaken. DATA SOURCES: An electronic search of MEDLINE, CiNAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, EMBASE and PsycARTICLES was undertaken from their inception to April 2016. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Any study design that incorporated psychological measures and clinical outcomes using participants with tendinopathy. RESULTS: Ten articles describing nine studies and 1108 participants were included. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the association of anxiety, depression and lateral epicondylalgia (LE). Strong evidence suggests LE is not associated with kinesiophobia. Moderate evidence links catastrophisation and distress with LE. Moderate evidence suggests distress is not associated with rotator cuff tendinopathy, but kinesiophobia and catastrophisation are. Limited evidence suggests patellar tendinopathy is not associated with anxiety or depression and kinesiophobia may be linked with suboptimal outcomes in Achilles tendinopathy. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: Tendinopathy requires an individualised approach to management. Clinicians should consider using validated screening tools for the presence of psychological variables as a part of their holistic management.


Subject(s)
Pain/psychology , Tendinopathy/psychology , Achilles Tendon/pathology , Anxiety/psychology , Catastrophization/psychology , Depression/psychology , Humans , Rotator Cuff/pathology , Tendinopathy/therapy , Tennis Elbow/psychology
6.
J Occup Environ Med ; 58(6): 588-93, 2016 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27206118

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The goal is to assess the relationships between psychosocial factors and both medial and lateral epicondylitis after adjustment for personal and job physical exposures. METHODS: One thousand eight hundred twenty-four participants were included in pooled analyses. Ten psychosocial factors were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-one (6.6%) and 34 (1.9%) participants have lateral and medial epicondylitis, respectively. Nine psychosocial factors assessed had significant trends or associations with lateral epicondylitis, the largest of which was between physical exhaustion after work and lateral epicondylitis with and odds ratio of 7.04 (95% confidence interval = 2.02 to 24.51). Eight psychosocial factors had significant trends or relationships with medial epicondylitis, with the largest being between mental exhaustion after work with an odds ratio of 6.51 (95% confidence interval = 1.57 to 27.04). CONCLUSIONS: The breadth and strength of these associations after adjustment for confounding factors demonstrate meaningful relationships that need to be further investigated in prospective analyses.


Subject(s)
Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Occupational Diseases/psychology , Tennis Elbow/physiopathology , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Adult , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fatigue/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
7.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 24(6): 365-9, 2016 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27077478

ABSTRACT

Enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin, generally known as tennis elbow, is a common condition arising in middle-aged persons. The diagnosis is typically clear based on the patient interview and physical examination alone; therefore, imaging and other diagnostic tests are usually unnecessary. The natural history of the disorder is spontaneous resolution, but it can last for >1 year. The patient's attitude and circumstances, including stress, distress, and ineffective coping strategies, determine the intensity of the pain and the magnitude of the disability. Despite the best efforts of medical science, no treatments, invasive or noninvasive, have been proven to alter the natural history of the condition. Given the lack of disease-modifying treatments for enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis origin, orthopaedic surgeons can benefit from learning effective communication strategies to help convey accurate information that is hopeful and enabling.


Subject(s)
Communication , Enthesopathy/psychology , Orthopedic Surgeons/psychology , Physician-Patient Relations , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Humans , Middle Aged
8.
Clin J Pain ; 32(12): 1069-1075, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26889612

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the acute effects of isometric exercise of different intensities on pain perception in individuals with chronic lateral epicondylalgia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants performed 3 experimental tasks completed in a randomized order on separate days: control (no exercise) and isometric wrist extension (10×15 s) at load 20% below (infrathreshold), and 20% above (suprathreshold) an individual's pain threshold. Self-reported pain intensity (11-point numeric rating scales), pressure pain threshold, and pain-free grip were assessed by a blinded examiner before, immediately after, and 30 minutes after task performance. Relation analysis between pain ratings and clinical variables, including pain and disability and kinesiophobia was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-four individuals with unilateral lateral epicondylalgia of median 3-month duration participated. Pain intensity during contraction was significantly higher during suprathreshold exercise than infrathreshold exercise (mean difference in numeric rating scale 1.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-1.5; P=0.002). Pain intensity during suprathreshold exercise was significantly correlated with pain and disability (R=0.435, P=0.034) and kinesiophobia (R=0.556, P=0.005). Pain intensity was significantly higher immediately after performance of suprathreshold exercise, compared with infrathreshold exercise (P=0.01) and control (P<0.001) conditions, whereas infrathreshold exercise and control conditions were comparable. Thirty minutes later, pain levels remained significantly higher for suprathreshold exercise compared with infrathreshold exercise (P=0.043). Pressure pain threshold and pain-free grip showed no significant effects of time, condition, or time×condition (P>0.05). DISCUSSION: Individuals with lateral epicondylalgia demonstrated increased pain intensity after an acute bout of isometric exercise performed at an intensity above, but not below, their individual pain threshold. Further investigation is needed to determine whether measurement of an individual's exercise induced pain threshold may be important in reducing symptom flares associated with exercise.


Subject(s)
Exercise/psychology , Isometric Contraction , Pain Perception , Pain Threshold/psychology , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Arm/physiopathology , Exercise/physiology , Female , Humans , Isometric Contraction/physiology , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain Perception/physiology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Random Allocation , Self Report , Single-Blind Method , Tennis Elbow/physiopathology
9.
Rheumatol Int ; 35(6): 1015-20, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25549600

ABSTRACT

To translate and culturally adapt the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), a widely used instrument for evaluating disability associated with elbow injuries, into Turkish (MEPS-T) and to determine psychometric properties of the translated version. The MEPS was translated into Turkish using published methodological guidelines. The measurement properties of the MEPS-T (construct validity and floor and ceiling effects) were tested in 91 patients with elbow pathology. The reproducibility of the MEPS-T was tested in 59 patients over 7-14 days. The responsiveness of the MEPS-T was tested in a subgroup of 46 patients diagnosed with lateral epicondylitis and who received conservative treatment for 6 weeks. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to estimate the test-retest reliability. The construct validity was analyzed with the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Effect size (ES) was used to assess the responsiveness. The distribution of floor and ceiling effects was determined. The MEPS-T showed very good test-retest reliability (ICC 0.89). The correlation coefficients between the MEPS-T and DASH and VAS were -0.61 and -0.53, respectively (p < 0.001). The highest correlations were between the MEPS-T and the mental component summary (r = 0.47, p = 0.001) and role emotional (r = 0.45, p = 0.001). The MEPS-T ES, 0.50, was moderate (95% CI 0.33-0.62). We observed no ceiling or floor effects. The MEPS-T represents a valid, reliable and moderately responsive instrument for evaluating patients with elbow disease.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Elbow Injuries , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennis Elbow/diagnosis , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Comprehension , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Emotions , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Recovery of Function , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Tennis Elbow/physiopathology , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Tennis Elbow/therapy , Time Factors , Translating , Treatment Outcome , Turkey
10.
Clin J Pain ; 31(1): 30-5, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24480912

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Predictors of outcome in lateral epicondylalgia, which is mainly characterized as a mechanical hyperalgesia, are largely limited to sociodemographic and symptomatic factors. Quantitative sensory testing is used to study altered pain processing in various chronic pain conditions and may be of prognostic relevance. METHODS: The predictive capacity of early measures of physical and psychological impairment on pain and disability and mechanical hyperalgesia, were examined using data from 41 patients assigned to placebo in a prospective randomized controlled trial of unilateral lateral epicondylalgia. Quantitative sensory testing (pressure, cold pain thresholds), motor function (pain-free grip), and psychological factors (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were measured at baseline. The outcome measures were the Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) scale and pressure pain threshold (PPT) measured by digital algometry at the affected elbow. Backward stepwise linear regression was used to predict PRTEE and PPT scores at 2 and 12 months. RESULTS: Cold pain threshold was the only consistent predictor for both PRTEE (P<0.034) and PPT (P<0.048). Initial PRTEE was the strongest single predictor of PRTEE at 2 months, whereas female sex was the strongest single predictor of PPT (P<0.002). At 1 year, final models explained 9% to 52% of the variability in pain and disability and mechanical hyperalgesia, respectively. DISCUSSION: Early assessment of cold pain threshold could be a useful clinical tool to help identify patients at risk of poorer outcomes and might provide direction for future research into mechanism-based treatment approaches for these patients.


Subject(s)
Cold Temperature/adverse effects , Functional Laterality/physiology , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Tennis Elbow/complications , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hand Strength/physiology , Humans , Hyperalgesia/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Physical Therapy Modalities , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennis Elbow/drug therapy , Tennis Elbow/rehabilitation
11.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 15: 270, 2014 Aug 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25112272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lateral Epicondylalgia (LE) is a common injury for which no reliable and valid measure exists to determine severity in the Dutch language. The Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) is the first questionnaire specifically designed for LE but in English. The aim of this study was to translate into Dutch and cross-culturally adapt the PRTEE and determine reliability and validity of the PRTEE-D (Dutch version). METHODS: The PRTEE was cross-culturally adapted according to international guidelines. Participants (n = 122) were asked to fill out the PRTEE-D twice with a one week interval to assess test-retest reliability. Internal consistency of the PRTEE-D was determined by calculating Crohnbach's alphas for the questionnaire and subscales. Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) were calculated for the overall PRTEE-D score, pain and function subscale and individual questions to determine test-retest reliability. Additionally, the Disabilities for the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores were obtained from 30 patients to assess construct validity; Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated between the PRTEE-D (subscales) and DASH and VAS-pain scores. RESULTS: The PRTEE was successfully cross-culturally adapted into Dutch (PRTEE-D). Crohnbach's alpha for the first assessment of the PRTEE-D was 0.98; Crohnbach's alpha was 0.93 for the pain subscale and 0.97 for the function subscale. ICC for the PRTEE-D was 0.98; subscales also showed excellent ICC values (pain scale 0.97 and function scale 0.97). A significant moderate correlation exists between PRTEE-D and DASH (0.65) and PRTEE-D and VAS pain (0.68). CONCLUSION: The PRTEE was successfully cross-culturally adapted and this study showed that the PRTEE-D is reliable and valid to obtain an indication of severity of LE. An easy-to-use instrument for practitioners is now available and this facilitates comparing Dutch and international research data.


Subject(s)
Cultural Characteristics , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Patients/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennis Elbow/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Pain Measurement , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Tennis Elbow/physiopathology , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Translating , Young Adult
12.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 23(4): 567-72, 2014 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24630548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Research suggests that phrases with negative content can affect patients' response to medical procedures and how they cope with medical illnesses. We hypothesized that patients with lateral epicondylitis who describe their condition in positive phrases cope better than those who do not. METHODS: We prospectively followed up 91 patients with lateral epicondylitis for 12 months. The patients indicated their baseline coping status based on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and were discharged with a wait-and-see policy. During follow-up interviews, the patients described the nature of their condition in their own words and were then categorized into either positive or negative phrasing groups. We compared these two groups regarding current coping status and whether they had sought additional treatment. We also analyzed for the factors associated with these outcomes. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline PCS scores between the two groups. At follow-up, patients in the positive phrasing group (n = 62) had significantly lower PCS scores and were less likely to seek additional treatment than those in the negative phrasing group (n = 29). Multivariable analyses showed that positive phrasing and low pain levels were independently associated with improvement in PCS scores and that negative phrasing and depression were independently associated with patients' seeking additional treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients' positive phrasing about their condition are associated with improvement in their coping status and with less use of medical resources in the case of lateral epicondylitis. This study suggests that patients with more positive attitudes toward their illness cope and comply better when a wait-and-see treatment is recommended by their physicians.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Competence , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physician-Patient Relations , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Tennis Elbow/therapy
13.
BMJ ; 347: f5160, 2013 Sep 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23999980

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of supplementing information and advice on analgesia and exercise from a general practitioner with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) as a non-drug form of analgesia to reduce pain intensity in patients with tennis elbow. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care. SETTING AND: 38 general practices in the West Midlands, UK. PARTICIPANTS: 241 adults consulting with a first or new (no consultation in previous six months) clinical diagnosis of tennis elbow. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to either primary care management alone, consisting of a consultation with a general practitioner followed by information and advice on exercises, or primary care management plus TENS to be used once a day for 45 minutes over six weeks (or until symptom resolution) for pain relief. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was self reported intensity of elbow pain (0-10 rating scale) at six weeks. Primary and secondary outcomes were measured at baseline and at six weeks, six months, and 12 months by postal questionnaire. Analysis was by intention to treat. RESULTS: 121 participants were randomised to primary care management plus TENS and 120 to primary care management only (first episode, n=197 (82%); duration <1-3 months, n=138 (57%)). Adherence to exercise and TENS recommendations reported at six weeks was low; only 42 participants in the primary care management plus TENS group met a priori defined adherence criteria. Both intervention groups showed large improvements in pain and secondary outcomes, especially during the first six weeks of follow-up. However, no clinically or statistically significant differences were seen between groups at any follow-up timepoint. At the primary endpoint (six weeks), the between group difference in improvement of pain was -0.33 (95% confidence interval -0.96 to 0.31; P=0.31) in favour of the primary care management only group, with adjustment for age, sex, and baseline pain score. CONCLUSIONS: This trial does not provide evidence for additional benefit of TENS as an adjunct to primary care management of tennis elbow. Poor adherence to interventions is evidence of the challenges of implementing self management treatment strategies in primary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN87141084.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia , Patient Compliance , Tennis Elbow , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods , Adult , Arthralgia/diagnosis , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/therapy , Exercise Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Self Care/psychology , Tennis Elbow/complications , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Tennis Elbow/therapy , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 95(1): 76-81, 2013 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23283376

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Upper-extremity-specific disability correlates with mood and coping strategies. The aim of this study was to determine if two psychological factors, kinesiophobia (fear of movement) and perceived partner support, contribute significantly to variation in upper-extremity-specific disability in a model that included factors known to contribute to variation such as depression, pain anxiety, and catastrophic thinking. METHODS: We performed an observational cross-sectional study of 319 patients who each had one of the following conditions: trigger finger (n = 94), carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 29), trapeziometacarpal arthrosis (n = 33), Dupuytren contracture (n = 31), de Quervain syndrome (n = 28), wrist ganglion cyst (n = 32), lateral epicondylosis (n = 41), and a fracture of the distal part of the radius treated nonoperatively six weeks previously (n = 31). Each patient completed the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and questionnaires measuring symptoms of depression, pain anxiety, catastrophic thinking, kinesiophobia, and perceived level of support from a partner or significant other. Stepwise multiple linear regression was used to determine significant independent predictors of the DASH score. RESULTS: Men had significantly lower (better) DASH scores than women (21 versus 31; p < 0.01). DASH scores also differed significantly by diagnosis (p < 0.01), marital status (p = 0.047), and employment status (p < 0.01). The DASH score correlated significantly with depressive symptoms (p < 0.01), catastrophic thinking (p < 0.01), kinesiophobia (p < 0.01), and pain anxiety (p < 0.01) but not with perceived partner support. The best multivariable model of factors associated with greater arm-specific disability (according to the DASH score) included sex, diagnosis, employment status, catastrophic thinking, and kinesiophobia and accounted for 55% of the variation. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample, kinesiophobia and catastrophic thinking were the most important predictors of upper-extremity-specific disability in a model that accounted for symptoms of depression, anxiety, and pathophysiology (diagnosis) and explained more than half of the variation in disability. Perceived partner support was not a significant factor. The consistent and predominant role of several modifiable psychological factors in disability suggests that patients may benefit from a multidisciplinary approach that optimizes mindset and coping strategies.


Subject(s)
Catastrophization/psychology , Disabled Persons/psychology , Movement , Muscular Diseases/psychology , Phobic Disorders/psychology , Adult , Aged , Arthritis/psychology , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disability Evaluation , Dupuytren Contracture/psychology , Fear/psychology , Female , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Metacarpus , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Trapezium Bone , Trigger Finger Disorder/psychology , Upper Extremity
15.
Appl Ergon ; 44(2): 241-53, 2013 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22939526

ABSTRACT

There is a serious lack of quantitative data regarding exposure-response relationships between occupational risk factors and musculoskeletal elbow and hand disorders. This paper explores such relationships in group-level data from our earlier cross-sectional studies. Prevalence of complaints (Nordic Questionnaire) and diagnoses (physical examination) were recorded in 19 groups of female workers (1891 individuals), and 8 groups of male workers (761 individuals), with highly similar work tasks within each group. Linear regression was performed on the group means of wrist postures and angular velocity (obtained by electrogoniometers), as well as muscular load (obtained using electromyography), recorded in representative sub-samples, and psychosocial exposure (Job Content Questionnaire). To tackle within-group variations in physical exposure, sensitivity analyses were performed by bootstrapping simulations, rendering confidence intervals. The sex-adjusted slope of the regression line (ß) for wrist angular velocity vs. complaints during the past 7 days was 0.6%/(°/s), (95% CI 0.3-0.9), and for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) 0.2%/(°/s), (0.1-0.3). For palmar flexion, p50, ß over the past 7 days was 0.8%/° (0.4-1.2); for CTS 0.3%/° (0.1-0.5); ß for muscular activity p90: 0.9%/%MVE (0.3-1.6), and 0.3%/%MVE (-0.03-0.6) respectively and finally ß for muscular rest: -1.2%/%time (-2.4-0.03) and -0.5%/%time (-0.9 to -0.01). Relationships were also demonstrated for low job control, job strain and isostrain. Women exhibited a higher prevalence of complaints than men. In conclusion, we have established quantitative exposure-response relationships between physical work load and elbow/hand disorders. Wrist angular velocity was the most consistent risk factor.


Subject(s)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/etiology , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Exposure , Tennis Elbow/etiology , Workload , Adult , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/physiopathology , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome/psychology , Data Collection , Elbow , Electromyography , Female , Hand , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Movement , Occupational Diseases/physiopathology , Occupational Diseases/psychology , Posture , Professional Autonomy , Social Support , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennis Elbow/physiopathology , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Workload/psychology , Wrist/physiology
16.
Am J Ind Med ; 56(4): 400-9, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23152138

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to assess the relationship between work-related combined physical and psychosocial factors and elbow disorders (lateral epicondylitis and non-specific disorders without lateral epicondylitis) in the working population. METHODS: A total of 3,710 workers (58% men) in a French region in 2002-2005 participated in physical examinations by occupational health physicians and assessed their personal factors and work exposure by self-administered questionnaire. Statistical associations between elbow disorders and risks factors were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 389 (10.5%) workers had elbow pain without lateral epicondylitis and 90 (2.4%) workers had lateral epicondylitis. Age, body mass index (>25), and low social support (only for men) were significant risks factors. Hard perceived physical exertion combined with elbow flexion/extension (>2 hr/day) and wrist bending (>2 hr/day) was a strong significant risk factor for elbow pain and epicondylitis: among men, adjusted Odds Ratio (ORa) = 2.6 (1.9-3.7) and ORa = 5.6 (2.8-11.3), respectively; among women, ORa = 1.4 (0.9-2.2) and ORa = 2.9 (1.3-6.5). CONCLUSIONS: This study emphasizes the strength of the associations between combined physical exertion and elbow movements and lateral epicondylitis. Certain observed differences in associations with lateral epicondylitis and elbow pain only indicate the need for additional longitudinal studies on different stages of elbow disorders and known risk factors.


Subject(s)
Cumulative Trauma Disorders/complications , Elbow , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Pain/etiology , Tennis Elbow/complications , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/epidemiology , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/psychology , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Tennis Elbow/epidemiology , Tennis Elbow/psychology
17.
Clin J Pain ; 28(7): 595-601, 2012 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22699135

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if sensory, motor, and psychological factors are different in severe lateral epicondylalgia compared with less severe cases and control. METHODS: A total of 164 patients with unilateral lateral epicondylalgia and 62 healthy control participants of comparable age and sex underwent the following testing: quantitative sensory testing (pressure, thermal pain thresholds), pain-free grip, quality of life (EuroQol), and psychological (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia) testing. Cluster analysis classified patients into mild, moderate, or severe subgroups using the Patient Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation. Data were then evaluated to determine differences between control and lateral epicondylalgia subgroups. RESULTS: Bilateral cold hyperalgesia (affected elbow, standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.14, P=0.000; unaffected elbow SMD -0.94, P=0.000) and unilateral heat hyperalgesia (SMD -1.06, P=0.001) were evident in severe lateral epicondylalgia in comparison to healthy controls. All patient groups regardless of severity demonstrated bilateral and widespread mechanical hyperalgesia relative to controls (P<0.003); however, only those with moderate and severe symptoms showed large differences (Absolute SMD>0.8) at all sites. Quality of life was significantly poorer in patients with severe symptoms, whereas anxiety, depression, and kinesiophobia did not differ between subgroups. DISCUSSION: Lateral epicondylalgia patients presenting with severe pain and disability could be distinguished by hypersensitivity to thermal stimuli, notably bilateral cold hyperalgesia. Findings may implicate a combination of central, peripheral, and sympathetic nervous system processes and may help explain the poorer outcomes found in this subpopulation.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/psychology , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Pain Threshold/physiology , Pain , Tennis Elbow , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Anxiety/etiology , Cold Temperature/adverse effects , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/etiology , Female , Functional Laterality , Humans , Hyperalgesia/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/complications , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/psychology , Pain Measurement , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Quality of Life , Tennis Elbow/complications , Tennis Elbow/diagnosis , Tennis Elbow/psychology
18.
Am J Ind Med ; 52(6): 479-90, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19347903

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lateral epicondylitis is a common work-related musculoskeletal disorder. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors associated with lateral epicondylitis among active workers. METHODS: Seven-hundred thirty-three workers in 12 Washington worksites participated in structured interviews, physical examinations, and individual exposure assessments of biomechanical and psychosocial factors. Multivariable logistic modeling was used. RESULTS: Thirty-eight subjects (5.2%) had lateral epicondylitis. Age (36-50 years-old), being female, and low social support at work were significant risk factors. Frequency of forceful exertion (> or =5 vs. < 1 times/min (OR 5.17, 95%CI 1.78-15.02), and > or =1 to <5 vs. <1 (OR 4.47, 95%CI 1.57-13.71)) and forearm supination at > or =45 degrees for > or =5% of the time with high lifting force (OR = 2.98, 95% CI 1.18-7.55) were significant physical load factors. CONCLUSIONS: Frequency of forceful exertion or a combination of forearm supination and forceful lifting were significant physical factors and should be considered for prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Industry , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Social Support , Tennis Elbow/epidemiology , Workload , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Occupational Diseases/psychology , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Tennis Elbow/etiology , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Washington , Young Adult
19.
Clin J Pain ; 23(6): 482-9, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17575487

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: First to compare pain and functional disability in tennis elbow (TE) patients with healthy controls. Second, to evaluate the relationship between the 2 major psychologic factors (anxiety and depression) and TE. METHODS: Sixteen TE patients were recruited from 46 consecutive attendees at an upper limb clinic: inclusion criteria were lateral epicondyle tenderness, pain with resisted wrist and middle finger extension and at least 3 months localized lateral elbow pain. Sixteen healthy controls with no upper limb problem were recruited from students and staff. Participants were given 4 questionnaires, together with instructions for completion: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Patient-Rated Forearm Evaluation Questionnaire, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The independent t test was used to compare the total and subscale scores between the groups. RESULTS: Significantly higher scores were found in TE for pain and function subscales and also total score for Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Patient-Rated Forearm Evaluation Questionnaire, and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Questionnaire. For Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, both anxiety and depression subscales (P<0.001) and the total score (P<0.01) were significantly higher in TE. According to the anxiety and depression subscales, 55% and 36% of patients, respectively, were classified as probable cases (score >11). DISCUSSION: TE patients showed markedly increased pain and functional disability. Significantly elevated levels of depression and anxiety pointed out the importance of psychologic assessment in TE patients. In the development of supportive and treatment strategies, we suggest the combination of "upper limb" and "psychologic" assessment tools.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Pain/etiology , Tennis Elbow/physiopathology , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Adult , Aged , Anxiety/psychology , Chronic Disease , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Depression/physiopathology , Depression/psychology , Fear/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/physiopathology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
Clin J Pain ; 21(4): 330-4, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15951651

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the early effects of local corticosteroid injection, naproxen, and placebo as treatments for tennis elbow in primary care. Specifically, to find out whether the extra pain reduction experienced by patients who are given the steroid injection in the short-term would be realized within the first 5 days of treatment and to attempt to assess how much extra pain may be associated with the injection initially. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial carried out in 23 family practices in the United Kingdom. A total of 164 patients aged 18 to 70 years presenting with a new episode of tennis elbow were recruited and invited to keep a daily record of their pain intensity and medication use over the first 5 days of randomized treatment using a "diary." RESULTS: On day 1, pain scores were higher in the injection group compared with the naproxen group and placebo group, and the injection group was also taking more painkillers. By day 4, the converse was true, pain scores were significantly lower in the injection group than the other 2 groups, and patients given an injection were less likely to be taking painkillers than those in the placebo group. DISCUSSION: Steroid injection was associated with an increase in reported pain for the first 24 hours of treatment, but the therapeutic benefits compared with naproxen and placebo were evident 3 to 4 days after the start of treatment.


Subject(s)
Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Methylprednisolone/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement/drug effects , Tennis Elbow/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Family Practice , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Medical Records , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Methylprednisolone/pharmacology , Middle Aged , Naproxen/pharmacology , Naproxen/therapeutic use , Placebos , Tennis Elbow/psychology , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...