Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 20(1): 33-37, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567315

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Benevolent injustice occurs when well-intentioned treatment efforts produce an outcome that limits the potential of a patient. The unintended harm can result in significant moral distress for the family and the healthcare team. CLINICAL FINDINGS: We discussed an ethical dilemma regarding a neonate who had suspected seizure and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after home birth delivery. The healthcare team experienced moral distress about the mother's desire to not use anti-seizure medications and instead trial other interventions such as cuddling. Subsequently, clinical analysis ruled out a seizure disorder. Genetic studies on this neonate confirmed hereditary hyperekplexia, which presented as exaggerated Moro reflex and apnea that mimicked seizure. INTERVENTION: We discussed how applying any one of the 4 basic ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, or justice could counteract benevolent injustice and moral distress. OUTCOMES: Discussions with the patient's mother and nurse allowed the team to overcome their reluctance to try the mother's treatment recommendations. This resulted in adopting the seemingly counterintuitive intervention of cuddling that turned out to be effective for this neonate with hereditary hyperekplexia. PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS: The moral distress associated with benevolent injustice should be identified early to minimize long-term consequences to the patient, family, and healthcare team. Healthcare teams should learn to apply ethical principles when discussing patient care concerns in an unbiased manner. Guided ethical discussions allow us to be more efficient in providing family-centered care that aligns with the patient's best interest.


Subject(s)
Beneficence , Hyperekplexia/therapy , Mothers/psychology , Neonatal Nursing/ethics , Neonatal Nursing/standards , Therapeutic Touch/ethics , Therapeutic Touch/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Relational Autonomy , Treatment Outcome
2.
BMC Nephrol ; 14: 129, 2013 Jun 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23799960

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Complementary and Alternative Medicines (CAMs) are increasingly practiced in the general population; it is estimated that over 30% of patients with chronic diseases use CAMs on a regular basis. CAMs are also used in hospital settings, suggesting a growing interest in individualized therapies. One potential field of interest is pain, frequently reported by dialysis patients, and seldom sufficiently relieved by mainstream therapies. Gentle-touch therapies and Reiki (an energy based touch therapy) are widely used in the western population as pain relievers.By integrating evidence based approaches and providing ethical discussion, this debate discusses the pros and cons of CAMs in the dialysis ward, and whether such approaches should be welcomed or banned. DISCUSSION: In spite of the wide use of CAMs in the general population, few studies deal with the pros and cons of an integration of mainstream medicine and CAMs in dialysis patients; one paper only regarded the use of Reiki and related practices. Widening the search to chronic pain, Reiki and related practices, 419 articles were found on Medline and 6 were selected (1 Cochrane review and 5 RCTs updating the Cochrane review). According to the EBM approach, Reiki allows a statistically significant but very low-grade pain reduction without specific side effects. Gentle-touch therapy and Reiki are thus good examples of approaches in which controversial efficacy has to be balanced against no known side effect, frequent free availability (volunteer non-profit associations) and easy integration with any other pharmacological or non pharmacological therapy. While a classical evidence-based approach, showing low-grade efficacy, is likely to lead to a negative attitude towards the use of Reiki in the dialysis ward, the ethical discussion, analyzing beneficium (efficacy) together with non maleficium (side effects), justice (cost, availability and integration with mainstream therapies) and autonomy (patients' choice) is likely to lead to a permissive-positive attitude. SUMMARY: This paper debates the current evidence on Reiki and related techniques as pain-relievers in an ethical framework, and suggests that physicians may wish to consider efficacy but also side effects, contextualization (availability and costs) and patient's requests, according also to the suggestions of the Society for Integrative Oncology (tolerate, control efficacy and side effects).


Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine/ethics , Renal Dialysis/ethics , Therapeutic Touch/ethics , Therapeutic Touch/statistics & numerical data , Complementary Therapies/ethics , Complementary Therapies/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Treatment Outcome
3.
Psychiatr Hung ; 27(3): 157-64, 2012.
Article in Hungarian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22781540

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The new bodymind theory describes unity of body and mind as a quantum process, which can go back to embryonic period of life. METHOD: Authors have worked out tandem hypnotherapy method regarding bodymind theory. Tandem has two meanings: (1) a multi-seater bicycle, (2) a mosaic word: Touch of Ancient and New generations with a Dialogue Experiencing Oneness of Minds (TANDEM). Hypnotherapy, psychodrama, family therapy, Hellinger's systemic-phenomenological approach, and, the holding-therapy can be viewed as precedents of the method. More than two persons in a physical closeness touching each other take part in therapy: (1) patient(s), (2) one or more co-therapists; one or more antagonists (in the latter case is of hypnodrama), (3) therapist, who is responsible to take the tandem of patient(s) and co-therapist(s) to trance, while (s)he keeps distance securing neutrality. RESULTS: The method will be illustrated with some case-vignettes. DISCUSSION: Sensory-motor level of development is supposed by the authors as stemmed from fetal period of life. It is suggested to be paralled to associative mode of experiencing, in which object and subject can't be viewed as differenciated from each other resulting unity or oneness experience. The most effective stimulus of associative mode of experiencing is regarded to be physical closeness and touching, which are seen in intimate situations. That is the reason why fundamental rules of therapeutic touching are to be kept. CONCLUSION: The new method can be viewed as a form of bodypsychotherapy having possibilities to resolve pathological consequences of either fetal or intergenerational traumas.


Subject(s)
Fetal Development , Hypnosis , Intergenerational Relations , Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical , Therapeutic Touch , Adult , Female , Humans , Hypnosis/methods , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Mothers/psychology , Nuclear Family/psychology , Parturition/psychology , Suggestion , Therapeutic Touch/ethics , Therapeutic Touch/methods , Therapeutic Touch/psychology , Twins/psychology
5.
Christ Bioeth ; 8(1): 25-42, 2002 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12956145
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...