Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 157
Filter
1.
Med Phys ; 47(2): e19-e51, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31574174

ABSTRACT

Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) and optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters (OSLD) are practical, accurate, and precise tools for point dosimetry in medical physics applications. The charges of Task Group 191 were to detail the methodologies for practical and optimal luminescence dosimetry in a clinical setting. This includes: (a) to review the variety of TLD/OSLD materials available, including features and limitations of each; (b) to outline the optimal steps to achieve accurate and precise dosimetry with luminescent detectors and to evaluate the uncertainty induced when less rigorous procedures are used; (c) to develop consensus guidelines on the optimal use of luminescent dosimeters for clinical practice; and (d) to develop guidelines for special medically relevant uses of TLDs/OSLDs such as mixed photon/neutron field dosimetry, particle beam dosimetry, and skin dosimetry. While this report provides general guidelines for TLD and OSLD processes, the report provides specific details for TLD-100 and nanoDotTM dosimeters because of their prevalence in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Equipment and Supplies/standards , Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry/methods , Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimetry/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Calibration , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Luminescence , Models, Theoretical , Neutrons , Photons , Remote Sensing Technology , Reproducibility of Results
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 186(2-3): 373-376, 2019 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31834932

ABSTRACT

In the Czech Republic, a more advanced version of postal audit in radiotherapy (RT) is available. It covers dose measurements with thermoluminescent dosemeters (TLD) in more complex conditions of irradiation, when dose distribution is affected by heterogeneities in the irradiated volume. Relative deviation between doses measured with TLDs and doses stated by RT centre should not exceed 3%. During 2015-2017, all Czech RT centres equipped with modern linear accelerators were subjected to this more advanced TLD audit. A total of  70% of participants complied with the limit of 3% in the first round of this audit.


Subject(s)
Particle Accelerators/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Czech Republic , Humans , Photons , Quality Control , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods
3.
Med Pr ; 70(6): 669-673, 2019 Dec 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31597982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The method of measuring doses based on the thermoluminescence phenomenon is not an absolute method. For this reason, to obtain correct results, it is necessary to calibrate detectors in the known radiation field. This paper presents a method for calibrating thermoluminescent detectors used in the measurement of personal dose equivalents (Hp(0.07)) obtained by nuclear medicine facility personnel when handling the 99mTc radionuclide. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The authors used self-developed high-sensitivity thermoluminescent detectors and a HF320C X-ray unit, as well as a rod phantom. Dosimeters were calibrated in accordance with the ISO 4037-3 standard. During the measurements a vial containing a 99mTc radionuclide with well-known activity was also used. The energy characteristics were supplemented by using a 137Cs source (irradiator 60Co/137Cs). RESULTS: The value of the calibration coefficient for 118 keV energy energy was (1.90±0.02)×10-5 mSv/imp. Taking into account the correction factor specified for of 140 keV energy at 0.962, the value of the calibration coefficient for 140 keV energy was determined as (1.83±0.02)×10-5 mSv/imp. CONCLUSIONS: Verification of the calibration coefficient determined for 140 keV energy carried out with a vial containing a 99mTc radionuclide confirmed the correctness of the procedure. Med Pr. 2019;70(6):669-73.


Subject(s)
Biological Monitoring/instrumentation , Biological Monitoring/methods , Calibration/standards , Gamma Rays/adverse effects , Luminescence , Nuclear Medicine/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Absorption, Radiation , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Occupational Exposure/standards
4.
Phys Med Biol ; 64(8): 08NT04, 2019 04 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30840946

ABSTRACT

Ge-doped silica fibre (GDSF) thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLD) are non-hygroscopic spatially high-resolution radiation sensors with demonstrated potential for radiotherapy dosimetry applications. The INTRABEAM® system with spherical applicators, one of a number of recent electronic brachytherapy sources designed for intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), presents a representative challenging dosimetry situation, with a low keV photon beam and a desired rapid dose-rate fall-off close-up to the applicator surface. In this study, using the INTRABEAM® system, investigations were made into the potential application of GDSF TLDs for in vivo IORT dosimetry. The GDSFs were calibrated over the respective dose- and depth-range 1 to 20 Gy and 3 to 45 mm from the x-ray probe. The effect of different sizes of spherical applicator on TL response of the fibres was also investigated. The results show the GDSF TLDs to be applicable for IORT dose assessment, with the important incorporated correction for beam quality effects using different spherical applicator sizes. The total uncertainty in use of this type of GDSF for dosimetry has been found to range between 9.5% to 12.4%. Subsequent in vivo measurement of skin dose for three breast patients undergoing IORT were performed, the measured doses being below the tolerance level for acute radiation toxicity.


Subject(s)
In Vivo Dosimetry/methods , Radiation Dosimeters/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Calibration , Female , Humans , In Vivo Dosimetry/standards , Radiotherapy Dosage , Silicon Dioxide/chemistry , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 185(2): 266-273, 2019 Dec 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30624748

ABSTRACT

The calibration of low energy X-ray experimental setup with strongly filtered beam dedicated to radiobiological research was performed using the absorbed dose calculated from the data collected by two types detectors. For this purpose a semiconductor (Amptek, USA) and a thermoluminescent (Institute of Nuclear Physics, Krakow, Poland) detectors were applied. The absorbed dose in water values estimated by both detectors are in good agreement.


Subject(s)
Phantoms, Imaging , Semiconductors/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Body Burden , Calibration , Humans , Monte Carlo Method , Relative Biological Effectiveness , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , X-Rays
6.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 141: 246-249, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29843989

ABSTRACT

Our research group has developed a thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD) based on pellets of LiF:Mg,Ti mixed with polytetrafluoroethylene (LiF:Mg,Ti +PTFE). This TLD can be used as a personal dosimeter. Extensive type testing, carried out with reference to the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) Standard, were performed for the purpose of accepting the LiF:Mg,Ti+PTFE as a personal TL dosimeter. Tests performed include repeatability, batch homogeneity, linearity, detection threshold, and light sensitivity. Results showed that locally made LiF:Mg,Ti+PTFE TLDs met all the standard requirements.


Subject(s)
Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Fluorides , Humans , Lithium Compounds , Magnesium , Polytetrafluoroethylene , Radiation Dosimeters/standards , Radiation Dosimeters/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/statistics & numerical data , Titanium
7.
J Radiol Prot ; 38(2): 549-564, 2018 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29498356

ABSTRACT

Fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures provide remarkable benefits to patients. However, medical staff working near the scattered radiation field may be exposed to high cumulative equivalent doses, thus requiring shielding devices such as lead aprons and thyroid collars. In this situation, it remains an acceptable practice to derive equivalent doses to the eye lenses or other unprotected soft tissues with a dosimeter placed above these protective devices. Nevertheless, the radiation backscattered by the lead shield differs from that generated during dosimeter calibration with a water phantom. In this study, a passive personal thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) was modelled by means of the Monte Carlo (MC) code Penelope. The results obtained were validated against measurements performed in reference conditions in a secondary standard dosimetry laboratory. Next, the MC model was used to evaluate the backscatter correction factor needed for the case where the dosimeter is worn over a lead shield to estimate the personal equivalent dose H p (0.07) to unprotected soft tissues. For this purpose, the TLD was irradiated over a water slab phantom with a photon beam representative of the result of a fluoroscopy beam scattered by a patient. Incident beam angles of 0° and 60°, and lead thicknesses between the TLD and phantom of 0.25 and 0.5 mm Pb were considered. A backscatter correction factor of 1.23 (independent of lead thickness) was calculated comparing the results with those faced in reference conditions (i.e., without lead shield and with an angular incidence of 0°). The corrected dose algorithm was validated in laboratory conditions with dosimeters irradiated over a thyroid collar and angular incidences of 0°, 40° and 60°, as well as with dosimeters worn by interventional radiologists and cardiologists. The corrected dose algorithm provides a better approach to estimate the equivalent dose to unprotected soft tissues such as eye lenses. Dosimeters that are not shielded from backscatter radiation might underestimate personal equivalent doses when worn over a lead apron and, therefore, should be specifically characterized for this purpose.


Subject(s)
Fluoroscopy/methods , Radiation Dosimeters/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Calibration , Equipment Design , Lead , Protective Clothing , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation
8.
Health Phys ; 114(5): 543-548, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29578903

ABSTRACT

The U.S. Navy uses the Harshaw 8840/8841 dosimetric (DT-702/PD) system, which employs LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs), developed and produced by Thermo Fisher Scientific (TFS). The dosimeter consists of four LiF:Mg,Cu,P elements, mounted in Teflon® on an aluminum card and placed in a plastic holder. The holder contains a unique filter for each chip made of copper, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), Mylar®, and tin. For accredited dosimetry labs, the ISO/IEC 17025:2005(E) requires an acceptance procedure for all new equipment. The Naval Dosimetry Center (NDC) has developed and tested a new non-destructive procedure, which enables the verification and the evaluation of embedded filters in the holders. Testing is based on attenuation measurements of low-energy radiation transmitted through each filter in a representative sample group of holders to verify that the correct filter type and thickness are present. The measured response ratios are then compared with the expected response ratios. In addition, each element's measured response is compared to the mean response of the group. The test was designed and tested to identify significant nonconformities, such as missing copper or tin filters, double copper or double tin filters, or other nonconformities that may impact TLD response ratios. During the implementation of the developed procedure, testing revealed a holder with a double copper filter. To complete the evaluation, the impact of the nonconformities on proficiency testing was examined. The evaluation revealed failures in proficiency testing categories III and IV when these dosimeters were irradiated to high-energy betas.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Dosimeters/standards , Radiation Protection/instrumentation , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Calibration , Equipment Design , Humans , Military Personnel , Radiation Dosage , Technology Assessment, Biomedical/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , United States
9.
Appl Radiat Isot ; 138: 45-49, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28780202

ABSTRACT

In the modern clinical practice of diagnostic radiology there is a growing demand for radiation dosimetry, it also being recognized that with increasing use of X-ray examinations additional population dose will result, accompanied by an additional albeit low potential for genetic consequences. At the doses typical of diagnostic radiology there is also a low statistical risk for cancer induction; in adhering to best practice, to be also implied is a low but non-negligible potential for deterministic sensitive organ responses, including in regard to the skin and eyes. Risk reduction is important, in line with the principle of ALARP, both in regard to staff and patients alike; for the latter modern practice is usually guided by Dose Reference Levels (DRL) while for the former and members of the public, legislated controls (supported by safe working practices) pertain. As such, effective, reliable and accurate means of dosimetry are required in support of these actions. Recent studies have shown that Ge-doped-silica glass fibres offer several advantages over the well-established phosphor-based TL dosimeters (TLD), including excellent sensitivity at diagnostic doses as demonstrated herein, low fading, good reproducibility and re-usability, as well as representing a water impervious, robust dosimetric system. In addition, these silica-based fibres show good linearity over a wide dynamic range of dose and dose-rate and are directionally independent. In the present study, we investigate tailor made doped-silica glass thermoluminescence (TL) for applications in medical diagnostic imaging dosimetry. The aim is to develop a dosimeter of sensitivity greater than that of the commonly used LiF (Mg,Ti) phosphor. We examine the ability of such doped glass media to detect the typically low levels of radiation in diagnostic applications (from fractions of a mGy through to several mGy or more), including, mammography and dental radiology, use being made of x-ray tubes located at the Royal Surrey County Hospital. We further examine dose-linearity, energy response and fading.


Subject(s)
Germanium , Glass , Silicon Dioxide , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Humans , Mammography , Radiation Dosage , Radiography , Radiography, Dental , Reference Standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/statistics & numerical data
10.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 178(4): 364-373, 2018 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28981726

ABSTRACT

In view of the recommendations of International Commission on Radiological Protection for reduction of the occupational annual dose limit for eye lens from 150 mSv to 20 mSv/y, questions have been raised on the adequacy of monitoring for the quantities Hp(10) and Hp(0.07). As an immediate requirement, in the present situation, where there is no exclusive eye lens dosemeter in India, the existing chest TLD badge was modified to be used as head badge (head dosemeter) by including a strap to enable wearing on the forehead. In order to estimate the eye lens dose in terms of the operational quantity Hp(3), the prevalent algorithm of chest badge was also modified. The modified algorithm was applied to estimate Hp(3) for dosemeters irradiated to various beta and photon radiations including mixtures. The Q values (estimated/delivered dose equivalent) were found to be within ±20% for most of the photon beams.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Lens, Crystalline/radiation effects , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Calibration , Humans , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Protection/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards
11.
Health Phys ; 112(3): 237-245, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28121723

ABSTRACT

Optically-stimulated luminescent dosimeters are capable of being interrogated multiple times post-irradiation. Each interrogation removes a fraction of the signal stored within the optically-stimulated luminescent dosimeter. This signal loss must be corrected to avoid systematic errors in estimating the average signal of a series of optically-stimulated luminescent dosimeter interrogations and requires a minimum number of consecutive readings to determine an average signal that is within a desired accuracy of the true signal with a desired statistical confidence. This paper establishes a technical basis for determining the required number of readings for a particular application of these dosimeters when using certain OSL dosimetry systems.


Subject(s)
Artifacts , Guidelines as Topic , Lighting/standards , Optical Devices/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Calibration/standards , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Lighting/instrumentation , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Semiconductors , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Int J Radiat Biol ; 93(1): 65-74, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27584947

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In the EC-funded project RENEB (Realizing the European Network in Biodosimetry), physical methods applied to fortuitous dosimetric materials are used to complement biological dosimetry, to increase dose assessment capacity for large-scale radiation/nuclear accidents. This paper describes the work performed to implement Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) dosimetry techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: OSL is applied to electronic components and EPR to touch-screen glass from mobile phones. To implement these new approaches, several blind tests and inter-laboratory comparisons (ILC) were organized for each assay. RESULTS: OSL systems have shown good performances. EPR systems also show good performance in controlled conditions, but ILC have also demonstrated that post-irradiation exposure to sunlight increases the complexity of the EPR signal analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Physically-based dosimetry techniques present high capacity, new possibilities for accident dosimetry, especially in the case of large-scale events. Some of the techniques applied can be considered as operational (e.g. OSL on Surface Mounting Devices [SMD]) and provide a large increase of measurement capacity for existing networks. Other techniques and devices currently undergoing validation or development in Europe could lead to considerable increases in the capacity of the RENEB accident dosimetry network.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/instrumentation , Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy/instrumentation , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Triage/methods , Biological Assay/standards , Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy/standards , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Europe , Humans , Lymphocytes/radiation effects , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Systems Integration , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Triage/standards
13.
J BUON ; 21(5): 1104-1112, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27837611

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To investigate the accuracy of field junctioning planning techniques (monoisocentric and rotating couch technique) for 3D-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). METHODS: In vivo dosimetry has been performed using thermo- luminescence dosimeters (TLDs) in 10 head and neck cancer patients (treated with monoisocentric technique) and 10 breast cancer patients (treated with rotating couch technique) irradiated with a 6 MV photon beam. Entrance dose measurements were performed in selected regions including the field junction area. RESULTS: The mean deviation between measured and expected dose in the region of junction was significantly higher in breast cases compared to head and neck irradiation (-2.8±15.4% and 0.2±8.2% respectively; Mann-Whitney U test: p=0.002). A comparison between lateral head and neck fields and tangential breast fields revealed that the latter was associated with larger dose discrepancies (-2.2 ± 4.6% vs -3.5 ± 5.7% respectively; Mann-Whitney U test: p=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate the superiority of monoisocentric technique compared to the rotating couch technique in terms of dose delivery accuracy for treatments with field junctioning planning techniques.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiotherapy, Conformal , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Radiation Exposure/standards , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Radiotherapy, Conformal/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards
14.
Phys Med Biol ; 61(17): 6384-99, 2016 09 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27499104

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper is the characterization of four thermoluminescence detectors (TLD), namely, LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu for the measurement of the entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) and estimation of the mean glandular dose (MGD) in digital mammography examinations at hospitals and clinics. Low-energy x-ray beams in the typical energy ranges of mammography, produced with a tungsten target and additional 60 µm molybdenum filtration were implemented and characterized at the Laboratory of Metrology of Ionizing Radiation at Instituto Superior Técnico. These beams were used for the characterization of the TLDs in terms of sensitivity, linearity, reproducibility, energy dependence and fading at 40 °C. The energy dependence test was further extended using clinical beams produced by mammography units at hospitals and clinics. The method proposed by the International Atomic Energy Agency was used for the measurement of ESAK and assessment of MGD. The combined standard uncertainty for the measurement of ESAK (and MGD) was determined in accordance to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. The x-ray beams generated in the 23-40 kVp range presented HVL values from 0.36 to 0.46 mm Al. The beam produced at 28 kVp (HVL 0.39 mm Al) was considered as reference. The radiation field defined a circle with 84 mm diameter with a maximum variation of the beam intensity of less than 1% at the top flat (plateau) within 4 cm of the central axis. The estimated total uncertainty for the measurement of air kerma was 0.42%. All the TL detectors tested showed good performance except the commercial Li2B4O7:Mn (or TLD-800) which was excluded due to its poor sensitivity in our experimental set up. Both lithium fluorides showed better linearity and reproducibility as well as lower energy dependence and fading when compared to lithium borates. The stable behaviour of LiF:Mg,Ti and LiF:Mg,Cu,P detectors is reflected in the low combined standard uncertainty of ±5.6% and ±4.3% respectively (or ±5.1% and ±3.6% if fading is neglected). In general a total combined uncertainty lower than ±10% for the measurement of ESAK was obtained for the four TL materials studied.


Subject(s)
Mammography/methods , Radiation Dosimeters/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Female , Humans , Mammary Glands, Human/radiation effects , Mammography/standards , Radiation Dosimeters/classification , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , X-Rays
15.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 17(2): 145-152, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27538269

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to ensure accuracy in radiation dose delivery, external dosimetry quality audit has an equal importance with routine dosimetry performed at clinics. To do so, dosimetry quality audit was organized by the Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL) of Pakistan Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology (PINSTECH) at the national level to investigate and minimize uncertainties involved in the measurement of absorbed dose, and to improve the accuracy of dose measurement at different radiotherapy hospitals. A total of 181 dosimetry quality audits (i.e., 102 of Co-60 and 79 of linear accelerators) for teletherapy units installed at 22 different sites were performed from 1989 to 2015. The percent deviation between users' calculated/stated dose and evaluated dose (in the result of on-site dosimetry visits) were calculated and the results were analyzed with respect to the limits of ± 2.5% (ICRU "optimal model") ± 3.0% (IAEA on-site dosimetry visits limit) and ± 5.0% (ICRU minimal or "lowest acceptable" model). The results showed that out of 181 total on-site dosimetry visits, 20.44%, 16.02%, and 4.42% were out of acceptable limits of ± 2.5% ± 3.0%, and ± 5.0%, respectively. The importance of a proper ongoing quality assurance program, recommendations of the followed protocols, and properly calibrated thermometers, pressure gauges, and humidity meters at radiotherapy hospitals are essential in maintaining consistency and uniformity of absorbed dose measurements for precision in dose delivery.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Control , Radioisotope Teletherapy/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Radiotherapy/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Calibration , Clinical Audit , Hospitals , Humans
16.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 17(4): 430-441, 2016 07 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27455485

ABSTRACT

A new design of 125I (Model IR-Seed2) brachytherapy source has been manufactured recently at the Applied Radiation Research School, Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute in Iran. The source consists of six resin beads (0.5 mm diameter) that are sealed in a cylindrical titanium capsule of 0.7 mm internal and 0.8 mm external diameters. This work aims to evaluate the dosimetric parameters of the newly designed 125I source using experimental measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Dosimetric characteristics (dose rate constant, radial dose function, and 2D and 1D anisotropy functions) of the IR-Seed2 were determined using experimental measurements and MC simulations following the recommendations by the Task Group 43 (TG-43U1) report of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). MC simulations were performed using the MCNP5 code in water and Plexiglas, and experimental measurements were carried out using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-GR207A) in Plexiglas phantoms. The measured dose to water in Plexiglas data were used for verification of the accuracy of the source and phantom geometry in the Monte Carlo simulations. The final MC simulated data to water in water were recommended for clinical applications. The MC calculated dose rate constant (Λ) of the IR-Seed2 125I seed in water was found to be 0.992 ± 0.025 cGy h-1U-1. Additionally, its radial dose function by line and point source approximations, gL(r) and gp(r), calculated for distances from 0.1 cm to 7 cm. The values of gL(r) at radial distances from 0.5 cm to 5 cm were measured in a Plexiglas phantom to be between 1.212 and 0.413. The calculated and measured of values for 2D anisotropy function, F(r, θ), were obtained for the radial distances ranging from 1.5 cm to 5 cm and angular range of 0°-90° in a Plexiglas phantom. Also, the 2D anisotropy function was calculated in water for the clinical application. The results of these investigations show that the uncertainty of the experimental data is within ± 7% between the measured and simulated data in Plexiglas. Based on these results, the MC-simulated dosimetric parameters of the new 125I source model in water are presented for its clinical applications in brachytherapy treatments.


Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/instrumentation , Brachytherapy/standards , Iodine Radioisotopes , Monte Carlo Method , Palladium , Phantoms, Imaging , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Anisotropy , Humans , Radiotherapy Dosage
17.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 170(1-4): 132-5, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27150516

ABSTRACT

Many individual monitoring services (IMSs) have long experience in delivering high-quality dosimetry, and many follow rigorous quality assurance (QA) procedures. Typically, these procedures have been developed through experience and are highly effective in maintaining high-quality dose measurements. However, it is not always clear how the range of QA procedures normally followed by IMSs maps on to the various requirements of ISO 17025. The Personal Dosimetry Service of Public Health England has interpreted its QA procedures both in operating existing services and in developing a new one.


Subject(s)
Radiometry/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Calibration , England , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care/standards , Quality Control , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Dosimeters , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiometry/standards , Radiotherapy Dosage , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Uncertainty
18.
Phys Med Biol ; 61(11): 4168-82, 2016 06 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27192093

ABSTRACT

Many organ dose calculation tools for computed tomography (CT) scans rely on the assumptions: (1) organ doses estimated for one CT scanner can be converted into organ doses for another CT scanner using the ratio of the Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI) between two CT scanners; and (2) helical scans can be approximated as the summation of axial slices covering the same scan range. The current study aims to validate experimentally these two assumptions. We performed organ dose measurements in a 5 year-old physical anthropomorphic phantom for five different CT scanners from four manufacturers. Absorbed doses to 22 organs were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters for head-to-torso scans. We then compared the measured organ doses with the values calculated from the National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for CT (NCICT) computer program, developed at the National Cancer Institute. Whereas the measured organ doses showed significant variability (coefficient of variation (CoV) up to 53% at 80 kV) across different scanner models, the CoV of organ doses normalised to CTDIvol substantially decreased (12% CoV on average at 80 kV). For most organs, the difference between measured and simulated organ doses was within ±20% except for the bone marrow, breasts and ovaries. The discrepancies were further explained by additional Monte Carlo calculations of organ doses using a voxel phantom developed from CT images of the physical phantom. The results demonstrate that organ doses calculated for one CT scanner can be used to assess organ doses from other CT scanners with 20% uncertainty (k = 1), for the scan settings considered in the study.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiation Dosage , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Child , Humans , Phantoms, Imaging , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards
19.
Acta Oncol ; 55(7): 909-16, 2016 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26934916

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has a long tradition of supporting development of methodologies for national networks providing quality audits in radiotherapy. A series of co-ordinated research projects (CRPs) has been conducted by the IAEA since 1995 assisting national external audit groups developing national audit programs. The CRP 'Development of Quality Audits for Radiotherapy Dosimetry for Complex Treatment Techniques' was conducted in 2009-2012 as an extension of previously developed audit programs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The CRP work described in this paper focused on developing and testing two steps of dosimetry audit: verification of heterogeneity corrections, and treatment planning system (TPS) modeling of small MLC fields, which are important for the initial stages of complex radiation treatments, such as IMRT. The project involved development of a new solid slab phantom with heterogeneities containing special measurement inserts for thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) and radiochromic films. The phantom and the audit methodology has been developed at the IAEA and tested in multi-center studies involving the CRP participants. RESULTS: The results of multi-center testing of methodology for two steps of dosimetry audit show that the design of audit procedures is adequate and the methodology is feasible for meeting the audit objectives. A total of 97% TLD results in heterogeneity situations obtained in the study were within 3% and all results within 5% agreement with the TPS predicted doses. In contrast, only 64% small beam profiles were within 3 mm agreement between the TPS calculated and film measured doses. Film dosimetry results have highlighted some limitations in TPS modeling of small beam profiles in the direction of MLC leave movements. DISCUSSION: Through multi-center testing, any challenges or difficulties in the proposed audit methodology were identified, and the methodology improved. Using the experience of these studies, the participants could incorporate the auditing procedures in their national programs.


Subject(s)
Radiometry/methods , Radiometry/standards , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans , International Agencies , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Control , Radiation Dosimeters , Radiometry/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/standards , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/methods , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards
20.
Radiat Res ; 185(2): 163-8, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26771174

ABSTRACT

Interest in standardized dosimetry for radiobiological irradiators has expanded over the last decade. At a symposium held at NIST, "The Importance of Standardization of Dosimetry in Radiobiology", a set of 12 criteria necessary for adequate irradiation was developed by the authors. Here we report on our review of dosimetry methods from various peer-reviewed publications and found that none of them satisfied all 12 criteria set forth by the authors of the NIAD/NCI/NIST proceedings. The inadequate reporting of dosimetry methods in the literature raises questions regarding the accuracy of the dose delivered to animal test subjects and the resulting experimental results. For this reason, we investigated the level of accuracy of dose delivery in radiation biology studies. We performed an irradiator output verification study of 12 radiation biology laboratories (7 gamma and 5 X-ray units) using polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) mouse phantoms and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) readouts at the University of Wisconsin Medical Radiation Research Center (UWMRRC). The laboratories housing each of these irradiators were asked to deliver specific doses to individual mouse phantoms. Simultaneously, mouse phantoms at the UWMRRC were irradiated with NIST-traceable reference beams representative of the subject laboratories' beam energies. The irradiated mouse phantoms were returned from the various institutions to the UWMRRC and the TLDs were processed, with their measured dose response compared to the known dose response of the calibration phantom TLDs. Of the five facilities using X-ray irradiators, only one delivered an output within 5% of the target dose. The dose differences for the other four X-ray irradiators ranged from 12 to 42%. These results indicate the potential need for standardization of dose determination and additional oversight of radiobiology investigations.


Subject(s)
Biological Assay/instrumentation , Biological Assay/standards , Laboratories/standards , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/instrumentation , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry/standards , Equipment Design , Equipment Failure Analysis , Guideline Adherence , Radiation Dosage , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...