Subject(s)
General Surgery/history , General Surgery/legislation & jurisprudence , Homicide/history , Homicide/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/history , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Third-Party Consent/history , Third-Party Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Tissue and Organ Procurement/history , Tissue and Organ Procurement/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Germany , History, 20th Century , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION AND SOURCES OF DATA: This paper briefly outlines the history of research on the recently dead, before critically exploring 1. In what sense can we harm the dead? 2. What are the justificatory arguments for employing family or parental consent for medical research on dead relatives? AREAS OF AGREEMENT, CONTROVERSY, GROWING POINTS OF INTEREST AND AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: The controversy surrounding harm in relation to research on dead bodies largely depends on how dead people are perceived. That is, 1. As Cadavers. 2. As Ante-mortem persons. 3. By Significant others. Controversy over whether we need to have consent from significant others (bereaved relatives) depends on the weight we give to the bereaved and their experience of the dead. Understanding this is timely in developing research and is relevant to the issue of consent around organ donation for transplants.
