Platelet membrane glycoproteins: a historical review.

The search for the components of the platelet surface that mediate platelet adhesion and platelet aggregation began for earnest in the late 1960s when electron microscopy demonstrated the presence of a carbohydrate-rich, negatively charged outer coat that was called the "glycocalyx." Progressively, electrophoretic procedures were developed that identified the major membrane glycoproteins (GP) that constitute this layer. Studies on inherited disorders of platelets then permitted the designation of the major effectors of platelet function. This began with the discovery in Paris that platelets of patients with Glanzmann thrombasthenia, an inherited disorder of platelet aggregation, lacked two major GP. Subsequent studies established the role for the GPIIb-IIIa complex (now known as integrin αIIbß3) in binding fibrinogen and other adhesive proteins on activated platelets and the formation of the protein bridges that join platelets together in the platelet aggregate. This was quickly followed by the observation that platelets of patients with the Bernard-Soulier syndrome, with macrothrombocytopenia and a distinct disorder of platelet adhesion, lacked the carbohydrate-rich, negatively charged, GPIb. It was shown that GPIb, through its interaction with von Willebrand factor, mediated platelet attachment to injured sites in the vessel wall. What follows is a personal reflection on the studies that were performed in the early pioneering days.

Assessing efficacy and therapeutic claims in emerging indications for recombinant factor VIIa: regulatory perspectives.

When compared with the evidence-based, cost-effectiveness criteria underpinning most government reimbursement schemes in the social market economies, the three regulatory hurdles of safety, quality and efficacy are probably of modest impact in influencing increased usage of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa; NovoSeven, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark). Nevertheless, efficacy claims must be supported if regulatory approval is to be granted for the wider range of indications that have been proposed for rFVIIa. With the refinement of clinical trial designs over the past 40 years, the randomized controlled trial (RCT) has assumed the role of gold standard, providing the highest level of evidence for therapeutic efficacy. However, it is incorrect to assume that regulatory authorities give sole credence to RCTs in assessing claims. It is noteworthy that the indications already accepted for rFVIIa by international regulatory authorities--including the treatment of inhibitors to factor VIII and factor IX, substitution for FVII deficiency, and treatment of Glanzmann's thrombasthenia--were supported not by RCTs but by studies conventionally considered to provide modest evidence levels. Therefore, the use of studies other than RCTs for the more recently proposed indications for rFVIIa in a range of conditions requiring hemostatic correction is perfectly feasible. What regulators expect are well-conducted and well-described studies adhering to principles of good clinical practice, which can be scrutinized for evidence of clinical efficacy and which are based on the initially proven principle for the drug. This paper discusses the regulatory history of rFVIIa in the major regulatory authorities and assesses the route needed to support claims being made in the mainstream literature. Recent episodes where post-market events have forced regulators to be more than usually cautious will be used as examples to suggest possible pitfalls to the extension of approved claims for rFVIIa. The major paths for enhancing access for indications in small patient numbers, where RCTs are even more difficult to perform, will be described and their use for possible extension of rFVIIa indications will be discussed.

Molecular basis of Glanzmann's Thrombasthenia and current strategies in treatment.

Glanzmann Thrombasthenia, an exceptional inherited platelet disorder is characterized by a complete lack of platelet aggregation due to a defect in the alpha(IIb)beta(3) complex or to a qualitative abnormality of this complex. Advances in molecular biology have permitted to precise the molecular abnormality on alpha(IIb) or beta(3) genes responsible for the disease and have also contributed to a better knowledge of normal platelet physiology. Hemorrhages are the main clinical problem. Current principles of therapeutic management are proposed, with special reference to the risk of platelet alloimmunisation.