Antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. It is the third leading cause of neonatal mortality globally constituting 13% of overall neonatal mortality. Despite the high burden of neonatal sepsis, high-quality evidence in diagnosis and treatment is scarce. Due to the diagnostic challenges of sepsis and the relative immunosuppression of the newborn, many neonates receive antibiotics for suspected sepsis. Antibiotics have become the most used therapeutics in neonatal intensive care units, and observational studies in high-income countries suggest that 83% to 94% of newborns treated with antibiotics for suspected sepsis have negative blood cultures. The last Cochrane Review was updated in 2005. There is a need for an updated systematic review assessing the effects of different antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis. OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of different antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following electronic databases: CENTRAL (2021, Issue 3); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase Ovid; CINAHL; LILACS; Science Citation Index EXPANDED and Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science on 12 March 2021. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs comparing different antibiotic regimens for late-onset neonatal sepsis. We included participants older than 72 hours of life at randomisation, suspected or diagnosed with neonatal sepsis, meningitis, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, or necrotising enterocolitis. We excluded trials that assessed treatment of fungal infections. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and our secondary outcomes were: serious adverse events, respiratory support, circulatory support, nephrotoxicity, neurological developmental impairment, necrotising enterocolitis, and ototoxicity. Our primary time point of interest was at maximum follow-up. MAIN RESULTS: We included five RCTs (580 participants). All trials were at high risk of bias, and had very low-certainty evidence. The five included trials assessed five different comparisons of antibiotics. We did not conduct a meta-analysis due to lack of relevant data. Of the five included trials one trial compared cefazolin plus amikacin with vancomycin plus amikacin; one trial compared ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid with flucloxacillin plus gentamicin; one trial compared cloxacillin plus amikacin with cefotaxime plus gentamicin; one trial compared meropenem with standard care (ampicillin plus gentamicin or cefotaxime plus gentamicin); and one trial compared vancomycin plus gentamicin with vancomycin plus aztreonam. None of the five comparisons found any evidence of a difference when assessing all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, circulatory support, nephrotoxicity, neurological developmental impairment, or necrotising enterocolitis; however, none of the trials were near an information size that could contribute significantly to the evidence of the comparative benefits and risks of any particular antibiotic regimen. None of the trials assessed respiratory support or ototoxicity. The benefits and harms of different antibiotic regimens remain unclear due to the lack of well-powered trials and the high risk of systematic errors. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is insufficient to support any antibiotic regimen being superior to another. RCTs assessing different antibiotic regimens in late-onset neonatal sepsis with low risks of bias are warranted.

ANTECEDENTES: La sepsis neonatal es una causa importante de morbilidad y mortalidad. Es la tercera causa de mortalidad neonatal a nivel mundial y constituye el 13% de la mortalidad neonatal total. A pesar de la elevada carga de la sepsis neonatal, la evidencia de alta calidad en el diagnóstico y el tratamiento es escasa. Debido a las dificultades de diagnóstico de la sepsis y a la relativa inmunosupresión del neonato, muchos reciben antibióticos por sospecha de sepsis. Los antibióticos se han convertido en el tratamiento más utilizado en las unidades de cuidados intensivos neonatales, y los estudios observacionales realizados en países de ingresos altos indican que entre el 83% y el 94% de los neonatos tratados con antibióticos por sospecha de sepsis tienen hemocultivos negativos. La última revisión Cochrane se actualizó en 2005. Se necesita una revisión sistemática actualizada que evalúe los efectos de los diferentes regímenes de antibióticos para la sepsis neonatal de inicio tardío. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar los efectos beneficiosos y perjudiciales de diferentes regímenes antibióticos para la sepsis neonatal de inicio tardío. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: Se hicieron búsquedas en las siguientes bases de datos electrónicas: CENTRAL (2021, número 3); Ovid MEDLINE; Embase Ovid; CINAHL; LILACS; Science Citation Index EXPANDED y Conference Proceedings Citation Index ­ Science el 12 de marzo de 2021. También se buscaron ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA) y cuasialeatorizados en las bases de datos de ensayos clínicos y en las listas de referencias de artículos identificados. CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Se incluyeron ECA que compararon diferentes regímenes de antibióticos para la sepsis neonatal de inicio tardío. Se incluyeron participantes mayores de 72 horas de vida en el momento de la asignación al azar, con sospecha o diagnóstico de sepsis neonatal, meningitis, osteomielitis, endocarditis o enterocolitis necrosante. Se excluyeron los ensayos que evaluaron el tratamiento de las infecciones micóticas. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Dos autores de la revisión, de forma independiente, evaluaron los estudios para inclusión, extrajeron los datos y evaluaron el riesgo de sesgo. Se utilizó el método GRADE para evaluar la certeza de la evidencia. El desenlace principal fue la mortalidad por todas las causas, y los desenlaces secundarios fueron: eventos adversos graves, asistencia respiratoria, apoyo circulatorio, nefrotoxicidad, deterioro del desarrollo neurológico, enterocolitis necrosante y ototoxicidad. El punto temporal principal de interés fue el seguimiento máximo. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: Se incluyeron cinco ECA (580 participantes). Todos los ensayos tuvieron alto riesgo de sesgo y evidencia de certeza muy baja. Los cinco ensayos incluidos evaluaron cinco comparaciones diferentes de antibióticos. No se realizó un metanálisis debido a la falta de datos relevantes. De los cinco ensayos incluidos, un ensayo comparó cefazolina más amikacina con vancomicina más amikacina; un ensayo comparó ticarcilina más ácido clavulánico con flucloxacilina más gentamicina; un ensayo comparó cloxacilina más amikacina con cefotaxima más gentamicina; un ensayo comparó meropenem con atención estándar (ampicilina más gentamicina o cefotaxima más gentamicina); y un ensayo comparó vancomicina más gentamicina con vancomicina más aztreonam. Ninguna de las cinco comparaciones encontró evidencia de una diferencia al evaluar la mortalidad por todas las causas, los eventos adversos graves, el apoyo circulatorio, la nefrotoxicidad, el deterioro del desarrollo neurológico o la enterocolitis necrosante; sin embargo, ninguno de los ensayos se acercó a un tamaño de información que pudiera contribuir significativamente a la evidencia de los beneficios y los riesgos comparativos de cualquier régimen antibiótico en particular. Ninguno de los ensayos evaluó la asistencia respiratoria o la ototoxicidad. Los efectos beneficiosos y perjudiciales de los diferentes regímenes de antibióticos aún no están claros debido a la falta de ensayos con un poder estadístico adecuado y al alto riesgo de errores sistemáticos. CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: La evidencia actual no es suficiente para apoyar que un régimen de antibióticos sea superior a otro. Se justifica la realización de ECA con bajo riesgo de sesgo que evalúen diferentes regímenes antibióticos en la sepsis neonatal de inicio tardío.

Brainstem auditory evoked responses in 37 dogs with otitis media before and after topical therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine whether intra-aural administration of aqueous solutions of marbofloxacin, gentamicin, tobramycin and ticarcillin (used off-licence) was associated with changes in hearing as measured by brainstem auditory evoked responses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dogs diagnosed with otitis media (n=37) underwent brainstem auditory evoked response testing and then were treated for their ear disease. First, the external ear canal and middle ear were flushed with sterile saline followed by EDTA tris with 0·15% chlorhexidine. Then, a combination of aqueous antibiotic mixed with an aqueous solution of EDTA tris was instilled into the middle ear. Follow-up examinations were undertaken for each dog, and treatment was continued until there were no detected infectious organisms or inflammatory infiltrate. Brainstem auditory evoked response testing was repeated after resolution of the infection and discontinuation of therapy. RESULTS: Brainstem auditory evoked responses in dogs treated with aqueous solutions of marbofloxacin or gentamicin remained unchanged or improved after therapy of otitis media but were impaired in dogs treated with ticarcillin or tobramycin. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: If off-licence use of topical antibiotics is deemed necessary in cases of otitis media, aqueous solutions of marbofloxacin and gentamicin appear to be less ototoxic than aqueous solutions of ticarcillin or tobramycin.

Higher risk of neutropenia associated with piperacillin-tazobactam compared with ticarcillin-clavulanate in children.

BACKGROUND: A series of cases of piperacillin-tazobactam (P/T)-associated neutropenia has been observed recently in children in our center. Because neutropenia was seldom observed in children treated with ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (T/C), we conducted a study to determine if there is an increased risk of neutropenia in children exposed to P/T in comparison with T/C. METHODS: Medical records of subjects aged <18 years who received at least 1 dose of P/T or T/C between 1 January 2008 and 30 June 2011 were reviewed. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine episodes of treatment (65 P/T, 234 T/C) met inclusion criteria. Among those episodes, 213 had data allowing complete white blood cell count analysis and were included in the final analysis. Thirteen cases of neutropenia were observed during the study period. The average time to onset was 17.6 days and all patients were aged <13 years. Seven cases (10.8%) occurred in the P/T group and 6 (2.6%) in the T/C group (unadjusted odds ratio, 4.59; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-14.17). Although a statistically significant correlation was observed between age, treatment duration, and total dose and the development of neutropenia (r = -0.121, P = .037; r = 0.267, P < .001; r = 0.260, P < .001, respectively), this was not the case for sex, indications, neutrophil count at initiation, and concomitant drug treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Although our results need to be confirmed, they suggest that children receiving long courses of therapy (>2 weeks) with P/T may be at increased risk of neutropenia, compared with T/C.

High dose intermittent ticarcillin-clavulanate administration in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients.

BACKGROUND: The Intermountain Cystic Fibrosis Pediatric Center utilizes ticarcillin-clavulanate 400mg/kg/day divided every 6h, (maximum 24 g/day). This dosing strategy is higher than the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) recommendations and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved package labeling. The purpose is to determine the safety of this dosing regimen. METHODS: A retrospective study of pediatric cystic fibrosis (CF) patients admitted from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2009 who received the dosing regimen for at least 7 days. Baseline and follow-up laboratory parameters were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: 127 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean (+ or - SD) ticarcillin dose was 3.5 g (+ or - 2.16) every 6 h; while the mean (+ or - SD) total ticarcillin dose was 13.5 g (+ or - 6.5) per day. No significant differences occurred in liver function tests, white blood count, and platelet count from baseline. Serum creatinine showed a statistically significant decrease from baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Higher than FDA approved doses of ticarcillin-clavulanate may be safely used in the treatment of exacerbations in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients.

Continuous infusion of ticarcillin-clavulanate for home treatment of serious infections: clinical efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Continuous infusion (CI) ticarcillin-clavulanate is a potential therapeutic improvement over conventional intermittent dosing because the major pharmacodynamic (PD) predictor of efficacy of beta-lactams is the time that free drug levels exceed the MIC. This study incorporated a 6-year retrospective arm evaluating efficacy and safety of CI ticarcillin-clavulanate in the home treatment of serious infections and a prospective arm additionally evaluating pharmacokinetics (PK) and PD. In the prospective arm, steady-state serum ticarcillin and clavulanate levels and MIC testing of significant pathogens were performed. One hundred and twelve patients (median age, 56 years) were treated with a CI dose of 9.3-12.4g/day and mean CI duration of 18.0 days. Infections treated included osteomyelitis (50 patients), septic arthritis (6), cellulitis (17), pulmonary infections (12), febrile neutropenia (7), vascular infections (7), intra-abdominal infections (2), and Gram-negative endocarditis (2); 91/112 (81%) of patients were cured, 14 (13%) had partial response and 7 (6%) failed therapy. Nine patients had PICC line complications and five patients had drug adverse events. Eighteen patients had prospective PK/PD assessment although only four patients had sufficient data for a full PK/PD evaluation (both serum steady-state drug levels and ticarcillin and clavulanate MICs from a bacteriological isolate), as this was difficult to obtain in home-based patients, particularly as serum clavulanate levels were found to deteriorate rapidly on storage. Three of four patients with matched PK/PD assessment had free drug levels exceeding the MIC of the pathogen. Home CI of ticarcillin-clavulanate is a safe, effective, convenient and practical therapy and is a therapeutic advance over traditional intermittent dosing when used in the home setting.

Once-daily, high-dose levofloxacin versus ticarcillin-clavulanate alone or followed by amoxicillin-clavulanate for complicated skin and skin-structure infections: a randomized, open-label trial.

This study tested whether levofloxacin, at a new high dose of 750 mg, was effective for the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections (SSSIs). Patients with complicated SSSIs (n=399) were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to 2 treatment arms: levofloxacin (750 mg given once per day intravenously [iv], orally, or iv/orally) or ticarcillin-clavulanate (TC; 3.1 g given iv every 4-6 hours) followed, at the investigator's discretion, by amoxicillin-clavulanate (AC; 875 mg given orally every 12 hours). In the clinically evaluable population, therapeutic equivalence was demonstrated between the levofloxacin and TC/AC regimens (success rates of 84.1% and 80.3%, respectively). In the microbiologically evaluable population, the overall rate of eradication was 83.7% in the levofloxacin treatment group and 71.4% in the TC/AC treatment group (95% confidence interval, -24.3 to -0.2). Both levofloxacin and TC/AC were well tolerated. These data demonstrate that levofloxacin (750 mg once per day) is safe and at least as effective as TC/AC for complicated SSSIs.

Antibiotic-induced recurring interstitial nephritis.

Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is often induced by drug therapy and accounts for 1%-3% of adult cases of renal failure. A 13-year-old white female with cystic fibrosis developed two episodes of biopsy proven AIN following antibiotic use over a 5-year period. The first episode resolved with pulse steroid therapy and the second resolved without intervention. Steroid therapy may play a role in aborting subsequent AIN attacks.

[A trial of using timentin (ticarcillin/clavulanate) in treating abdominal surgical infection]. / Opyt primeneniia timentina (tikartsillin/klavulanata) v lechenii abdominal'noi khirurgicheskoi infektsii.

Efficacy of timentin was studied in the treatment of 19 patients with peritonitis of various etiology and clinical and laboratory signs of systemic inflammatory reaction characteristic of abdominal sepsis. The clinical and bacteriological effects were recorded in 84.2 and 87.5 per cent of the cases respectively. The drug was administered intravenously dropwise for 30 minutes in a dose of 3.1 g every 4 hours. The treatment course was 4-11 days. The treatment failed in 3 patients. One of them had general peritonitis of gynecological etiology. In the other no significant regression of abdominal sepsis was observed, Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains were isolated from the abdominal cavity, the antibiotic was changed, still incurable polyorganic insufficiency developed and the patient died. The third patient had perforation of the large intestine due to tumor. No adverse reactions to the use of timentin in any of the cases was observed.

[The clinical efficacy of ticarcillin/clavulanate in severe pneumonia]. / Klinicheskaia éffektivnost' tikartsillin/klavulanata pri tiazheloi pnevmonii.

Efficacy of ticarcillin/clavulanate was studied in the treatment of 11 patients with severe community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia in an open controlled trial. The drug was administered in a dose of 3.1 g every 4 or 6 hours depending on the infection severity. When pneumonia was due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa, amikacin was additionally used. The positive clinical effect of ticarcillin/clavulanate was stated in 73 per cent of the patients. The pathogen eradication was stated in all the patients. However, in 2 cases superinfection due to P.aeruginosa developed. Mild adverse effects were observed in 2 cases. It is concluded that ticarcillin/clavulanate is highly efficient in the treatment of patients with severe or complicated pneumonia. In cases with ventilator-associated pneumonia it is advisable to use ticarcillin/clavulanate in combination with an aminoglycoside.

A randomized comparison of the safety and efficacy of once-daily gentamicin or thrice-daily gentamicin in combination with ticarcillin-clavulanate.

PURPOSE: The primary purpose of the clinical trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of once-a-day compared with three-times-a-day gentamicin in patients with serious infections who had protocol-determined peak serum aminoglycoside concentrations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 249 hospitalized patients with suspected or proven serious infections were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to gentamicin given three times a day with ticarcillin-clavulanate (TC), gentamicin once a day with TC, or ticarcillin-clavulanate (TC) alone. The gentamicin once-a-day dosage for patients with estimated creatinine clearance values of > or =80 mL/min was 5.1 mg/kg. With lower creatinine clearance estimates, the mg/kg dosage of gentamicin was decreased, and the dosage intervals (once daily or three times a day) were maintained. Evaluability required documentation of achievement of protocol-defined peak serum gentamicin levels. RESULTS: Of the total 175 evaluable patients, there were no significant differences found between treatment regimens with respect to clinical or microbiologic efficacy. Bedside audiometry proved impractical due to the frequency of altered mental state in ill patients. Based on the traditional increase in serum creatinine values from baseline values, no differences in renal toxicity between the treatment groups was identified. When changes in renal function were reanalyzed based on maintaining, as opposed to worsening, of renal function, preservation of renal function was better in the gentamicin once-a-day patients as opposed to the gentamicin three-times-a-day patients, P <0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Gentamicin once a day plus TC, gentamicin three times a day plus TC, and TC alone had similar effects in seriously ill hospitalized patients. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was similar in the three treatment groups. Using a nonvalidated post-hoc analysis, renal function was better preserved in gentamicin once-a-day + TC and TC-only patients as opposed to gentamicin three-times-a-day + TC.

Positive direct antiglobulin tests and haemolytic anaemia following therapy with beta-lactamase inhibitor containing drugs may be associated with nonimmunologic adsorption of protein onto red blood cells.

A high incidence (39%) of positive direct antiglobulin tests (DATs) has been reported in patients taking Unasyn [ampicillin sodium plus sulbactam sodium (a beta-lactamase inhibitor)]. Three of four patients, with positive DATs, receiving Unasyn or Timentin [ticarcillin disodium plus clavulanate potassium (also a beta-lactamase inhibitor)] developed a haemolytic anaemia (HA) associated with a positive DAT, which resolved when drug therapy was stopped. The patients' sera did not react with red blood cells (RBCs) in the presence of Unasyn or Timentin, but when drug-treated RBCs were tested, patients' sera and normal sera reacted equally by indirect antiglobulin test. Following incubation in normal sera, RBCs treated with Unasyn, Timentin, Augmentin (amoxicillin + clavulanate), sulbactam and clavulanate reacted with anti-human globulin and anti-human albumin (an index of non-specific adsorption); RBCs treated with ampicillin and amoxicillin were nonreactive. The beta-lactamase inhibitors sulbactam and clavulanate seem to cause nonimmunologic adsorption of protein onto RBCs in vitro. This may explain the high incidence of positive DATs detected in patients taking Unasyn, which contains sulbactam. It was not possible to prove that there was a direct association between the nonspecific uptake of protein onto drug-treated RBCs in vitro with the positive DATs or the HA.

Agranulocytosis induced by vancomycin or ticarcillin/clavulanate.

OBJECTIVE: To reacquaint clinicians with a reportedly rare adverse event of agranulocytosis occurring after long-term administration of vancomycin and ticarcillin/clavulanate, with a subsequent review of other reported cases in the literature. CASE SUMMARY: A 45-year-old white woman with spina bifida developed agranulocytosis (2.7 x 10(3)/mm3 white blood cells with only 3% polymorphonuclear leukocytes and no reported eosinophils or basophils) after long-term administration of vancomycin and ticarcillin/clavulanate for decubitus ulcers and chronic osteomyelitis. Consequently, the cell counts rebounded rapidly on discontinuation of both medications and returned to normal within 1 week. DISCUSSION: The incidence of vancomycin-associated neutropenia is presumably rare, but the increased use of vancomycin may disclose a more frequent occurrence. It is suggested that the mechanism for the reaction is immunologically mediated, yet this remains unclear. Although it is difficult to determine the causative agent in this case, vancomycin was most suspect clinically. Ticarcillin/clavulanate is less likely because our patient has since been readmitted and treated with oxacillin, imipenem/cilastatin, and amoxicillin/clavulanate without affecting the white blood cell count. In that regard, it could be reasoned that an immunologic reaction to ticarcillin would have resulted in a similar outcome with other penicillins. CONCLUSIONS: This case serves as a reminder to clinicians that patients receiving long-term treatment with vancomycin should have their white blood cell count monitored at least weekly.

Assessment of the enzymuria resulting from gentamicin alone and combinations of gentamicin with various beta-lactam antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the propensity of beta-lactam antimicrobials to ameliorate or potentiate aminoglycoside-induced renal enzymuria. DESIGN: Two open, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group studies were conducted in young, healthy, male volunteer subjects. Using a common protocol, 24-hour urine collections were analyzed for the renal tubular enzymes alanine aminopeptidase (AAP) and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), as well as for creatinine. Antimicrobial combinations studied included gentamicin plus placebo and gentamicin plus ticarcillin/clavulanate (protocol 1); and gentamicin plus placebo, gentamicin plus piperacillin, and gentamicin plus ceftazidime (protocol 2). The antimicrobial regimens were administered for 7 days. Eight subjects completed each treatment group. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between treatment groups with regard to urine creatinine excretion or serum gentamicin concentrations in either protocol. Enzymuria (AAP [p = 0.039] and NAG [p = 0.337]) was decreased in the gentamicin plus ticarcillin/clavulanate treatment compared with that in the gentamicin plus placebo treatment. Increased enzymuria, as indicated by increased urine concentrations of AAP and NAG, was observed in the gentamicin plus ceftazidime treatment (p < 0.05) compared with the other two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Based on relative enzymuria, ticarcillin/clavulanate may be renal protective. Piperacillin neither potentiated nor ameliorated aminoglycoside-induced enzymuria. Since acute elevations in AAP and NAG reflect insults to the kidney, these studies suggest that ceftazidime may enhance aminoglycoside-induced renal injury. Piperacillin had no effect on enzymuria and would appear not to enhance or protect against aminoglycoside-induced renal injury.

Considerations for therapy of mixed infections: focus on intraabdominal infection.

Intraabdominal infections are a wide range of diseases that include penetrating abdominal trauma, appendicitis, peritonitis, and abscess. Most are polymicrobic, involving aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. The primary treatment is surgery, but important issues regarding administration of antimicrobials may affect patient outcome. Evaluation of an antimicrobial regimen must include consideration of outcomes--survival, organ failure, adverse drug effects, and superinfection. Single-agent regimens have demonstrated benefit in patients with acute intraabdominal contamination and established infections. Guidelines for selecting antimicrobial agents are available from the Surgical Infection Society. Regimens are effective when active against most bacteria isolated from the focus of abdominal infection. The patient's clinical response, not culture results independent of clinical findings, is the primary guide for directing changes in therapy.

Piperacillin/tazobactam compared with ticarcillin/clavulanate in community-acquired bacterial lower respiratory tract infection.

The efficacy and safety of a new combination parenteral antibiotic, piperacillin/tazobactam, was compared with that of parenteral ticarcillin/clavulanate in the treatment of adult patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. A total of 299 patients were enrolled in this multicentre, double-blind, comparative study; 177 received piperacillin/tazobactam and 122 received ticarcillin/clavulanate. Of these, 119 met the evaluability criteria (69, piperacillin/tazobactam and 50, ticarcillin/clavulanate). The study drugs (piperacillin/tazobactam 3 g/375 mg or ticarcillin/clavulanate 3 g/100 mg) were given every 6 h by slow iv infusion for a minimum of 5 days. The favourable clinical response (cured and improved) rates of evaluable patients were 84% and 64% at endpoint (P < 0.01) for piperacillin/tazobactam and ticarcillin/clavulanate, respectively. The favourable bacteriological response at the early follow-up (eradicated and presumed eradicated) were 91% and 67% for piperacillin/tazobactam and ticarcillin/clavulanate, respectively (P < 0.01). At endpoint, 84% and 64%, respectively (P = 0.02) had a favourable response. The most common adverse experiences involved the gastrointestinal tract and occurred in 31.6% of the piperacillin/tazobactam group compared with 20.5% in the ticarcillin/clavulanate group (P = 0.02). These events were mild and generally did not affect therapy. Piperacillin/tazobactam appears to be more effective than ticarcillin/clavulanate in this patient population and is generally well tolerated.

Ticarcillin-clavulanic acid pharmacokinetics in preterm neonates with presumed sepsis.

The objective of the reported study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of ticarcillin and clavulanic acid in premature low-birth-weight (less than 2,200 g) neonates with presumed sepsis. Eleven infants received 12 courses of ticarcillin-clavulanic acid at 75 mg/kg of body weight intravenously every 12 h. Blood samples were collected at 0.5, 1.5, 4, and 8 h following the infusion of the initial dose. The concentrations of ticarcillin and clavulanic acid were determined by a microbiologic assay. Median (interpatient coefficients of variation) values for the volume of the central compartment, total steady-state volume, distributional clearance, total clearance, and terminal elimination half-life for ticarcillin were 0.030 liter/kg (21%), 0.26 liter/kg (48%), 0.41 liter/h/kg (47%), 0.047 liter/h/kg (47%), and 4.2 h (45%), respectively. For clavulanic acid the parameters were 0.28 liter/kg (32%), 0.36 liter/kg (34%), 11 liters/h/kg (36%), 0.12 liters/h/kg (72%), and 1.95 h (40%), respectively. Our results suggest that the current dosing recommendations of 75 mg/kg every 12 h risk subtherapeutic clavulanic acid concentrations and that 50 mg/kg every 6 h is a more rational dosing strategy.