ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Acellular dermal matrix is used in most postmastectomy implant-based breast reconstructions in the United States. It is believed to be safe, despite a slightly increased complication rate. Although never established in a unifying study, the primary advantage of acellular dermal matrix is believed to be an enhanced aesthetic result, thus justifying the added expense. The purpose of this study was to assess the aesthetic benefits of acellular dermal matrix in expander-to-implant breast reconstruction. METHODS: A systematic review adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was performed including all original studies examining aesthetic outcomes of expander-to-implant breast reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix compared to muscular coverage. Direct-to-implant and prepectoral studies were excluded from the evaluation. The results were aggregated and reported as a summary. RESULTS: Among 883 studies identified, 49 full-text articles were reviewed and nine articles ultimately met inclusion criteria. All nine studies were not randomized. Of these, three articles (1448 total patients) evaluated reconstruction aesthetic outcomes by patient satisfaction, whereas six articles evaluated the aesthetic outcomes by external observer (504 total patients). None of the articles evaluating patient satisfaction reported a difference between acellular dermal matrix and muscular reconstruction. Five of the six articles using objective outcomes demonstrated significant improvement in aesthetic outcome in the acellular dermal matrix group. CONCLUSIONS: Although little evidence exists evaluating the aesthetic benefits of acellular dermal matrix for expander-to-implant breast reconstruction, the data suggest that objective observers consider acellular dermal matrix-assisted expander-to-implant breast reconstructions aesthetically superior to reconstruction with only muscular coverage, but patients appear to be equally satisfied with both reconstructive options.
Subject(s)
Acellular Dermis , Breast Implantation/methods , Esthetics , Tissue Expansion/methods , Breast Implantation/psychology , Breast Implants/psychology , Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Mastectomy/methods , Mastectomy/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Tissue Expansion/instrumentation , Tissue Expansion/psychology , Tissue Expansion Devices/psychologySubject(s)
Breast Implants/adverse effects , Carbon Dioxide/administration & dosage , Saline Solution/administration & dosage , Tissue Expansion Devices/adverse effects , Air Travel/statistics & numerical data , Breast Implants/psychology , Breast Implants/trends , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Patient Satisfaction , Perception/physiology , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Tissue Expansion Devices/economics , Tissue Expansion Devices/psychology , Tissue Expansion Devices/trendsABSTRACT
Breast cancer is the most common diagnosed cancer in women. One out of 8 women is diagnosed with this disease (). Today many women are candidates for breast reconstruction and opt for reconstructive surgery at the time of mastectomy. Plastic surgical nurses provide a vital link in assessing and assisting patients to acquire and assimilate the necessary information required to make informed decisions regarding reconstruction. Although there are a variety of options in breast reconstruction, the purpose of this article is to discuss tissue expansion after mastectomy for breast restoration. The article identifies the needs women may have both preoperatively and postoperatively. Orem's self-care theory model is used to describe roles nurses may assume to assist patients in decision making and performance of self-care activities during the reconstructive process.
