Risk factors for infection at the saphenous vein harvest site after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infection after saphenous vein harvest is common, with reported leg wound infection rates ranging from 2 to 24%. There have been few investigations into sex-related differences in complication rates. Moreover, varied effects of smoking have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors such as gender and smoking, associated with surgical site infection after vein graft harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. METHODS: We included 2,188 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting surgery with at least one vein graft at our centre from 2009 to 2018. All patients were followed up postoperatively. Risk factors for leg wound infection requiring antibiotic treatment and surgical revision were analysed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 374 patients (17.1%) received antibiotic treatment and 154 (7.0%) underwent surgical revision for leg wound infection at the harvest site. Female sex, high body mass index, diabetes mellitus, longer operation time, peripheral vascular disease and direct oral anticoagulants were independently associated with any leg wound infection at the harvest site. Among surgically revised patients, female sex and insulin or oral treatment for diabetes mellitus as well as longer operation time were independent risk factors. Smoking was not associated with leg wound infection. CONCLUSION: Female sex is associated with increased risk of leg wound infection. The underlying mechanism is unknown. In the current population, previous or current smoking was not associated with an increased risk of leg wound infection.

Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors.

BACKGROUND: Waiting lists for kidney transplantation continue to grow. Live kidney donation significantly reduces waiting times and improves long-term outcomes for recipients. Major disincentives to potential kidney donors are the pain and morbidity associated with surgery. This is an update of a review published in 2011. OBJECTIVES: To assess the benefits and harms of open donor nephrectomy (ODN), laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), hand-assisted LDN (HALDN) and robotic donor nephrectomy (RDN) as appropriate surgical techniques for live kidney donors. SEARCH METHODS: We contacted the Information Specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 31 March 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LDN with ODN, HALDN, or RDN were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for eligibility, assessed study quality, and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information where necessary. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies randomising 1280 live kidney donors to ODN, LDN, HALDN, or RDN were included. All studies were assessed as having a low or unclear risk of bias for selection bias. Five studies had a high risk of bias for blinding. Seven studies randomised 815 live kidney donors to LDN or ODN. LDN was associated with reduced analgesia use (high certainty evidence) and shorter hospital stay, a longer procedure and longer warm ischaemia time (moderate certainty evidence). There were no overall differences in blood loss, perioperative complications, or need for operations (low or very low certainty evidence). Three studies randomised 270 live kidney donors to LDN or HALDN. There were no differences between HALDN and LDN for analgesia requirement, hospital stay (high certainty evidence), duration of procedure (moderate certainty evidence), blood loss, perioperative complications, or reoperations (low certainty evidence). The evidence for warm ischaemia time was very uncertain due to high heterogeneity. One study randomised 50 live kidney donors to retroperitoneal ODN or HALDN and reported less pain and analgesia requirements with ODN. It found decreased blood loss and duration of the procedure with HALDN. No differences were found in perioperative complications, reoperations, hospital stay, or primary warm ischaemia time. One study randomised 45 live kidney donors to LDN or RDN and reported a longer warm ischaemia time with RDN but no differences in analgesia requirement, duration of procedure, blood loss, perioperative complications, reoperations, or hospital stay. One study randomised 100 live kidney donors to two variations of LDN and reported no differences in hospital stay, duration of procedure, conversion rates, primary warm ischaemia times, or complications (not meta-analysed). The conversion rates to ODN were 6/587 (1.02%) in LDN, 1/160 (0.63%) in HALDN, and 0/15 in RDN. Graft outcomes were rarely or selectively reported across the studies. There were no differences between LDN and ODN for early graft loss, delayed graft function, acute rejection, ureteric complications, kidney function or one-year graft loss. In a meta-regression analysis between LDN and ODN, moderate certainty evidence on procedure duration changed significantly in favour of LDN over time (yearly reduction = 7.12 min, 95% CI 2.56 to 11.67; P = 0.0022). Differences in very low certainty evidence on perioperative complications also changed significantly in favour of LDN over time (yearly change in LnRR = 0.107, 95% CI 0.022 to 0.192; P = 0.014). Various different combinations of techniques were used in each study, resulting in heterogeneity among the results. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: LDN is associated with less pain compared to ODN and has comparable pain to HALDN and RDN. HALDN is comparable to LDN in all outcomes except warm ischaemia time, which may be associated with a reduction. One study reported kidneys obtained during RDN had greater warm ischaemia times. Complications and occurrences of perioperative events needing further intervention were equivalent between all methods.

Asystolic donor warm ischemia time is associated with development of postreperfusion syndrome in donation after circulatory death liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Individual events during donation after circulatory death (DCD) procurement, such as hypotensive or hypoxic warm ischemia, or circulatory arrest are all a part of donor warm ischemia time (dWIT), and may have differing effects on the outcome of the liver graft. This study aimed to identify risk factors for postreperfusion syndrome (PRS), a state of severe hemodynamic derangement following graft reperfusion, and its impact on DCD liver transplantation (LT) outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis using 106 DCD LT. Detailed information for events during procurement (withdrawal of life support; systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg; oxygen saturation < 80%; circulatory arrest; aortic cold perfusion) and their association with the development of PRS were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: The overall incidence of PRS was 26.4%, occurring in 28 patients. Independent risk factors for PRS were asystolic dWIT (odds ratio (OR) 3.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-9.66) and MELD score (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.01-1.10). Total bilirubin was significantly higher in the PRS group at postoperative day (POD) 1 (p = .02; 5.2 mg/dL vs. 3.4 mg/dL), POD 3 (p = .049; 4.5 mg/dL vs. 2.8 mg/dL), and POD 7 (p = .04; 3.1 mg/dL vs. 1.9 mg/dL). Renal replacement therapy after LT was more likely to be required in the PRS group (p = .01; 48.2% vs. 23.1%). CONCLUSION: Asystolic dWIT is a risk factor for the development of PRS in DCD LT. Our results suggest that asystolic dWIT should be considered when selecting DCD liver donors.

Harvest of large fascia lata autograft: Outcomes in 108 patients.

PURPOSE: Due to the reclassification of transvaginal mesh as a high-risk device, there has been renewed interest in the use of fascia lata in pelvic floor reconstruction. Here we report our experience in 108 patients who underwent large fascia lata harvest for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. Our primary objective was to highlight the postoperative morbidity of the large fascia lata harvest in patients who underwent POP repair using fascia lata autograft. METHODS: Surgery involved harvesting a fascia lata graft through a small lateral upper thigh incision and was used for either autologous transvaginal POP repair or autologous sacrocolpopexy. To prevent seroma, a temporary Jackson-Pratt drain was intraoperatively placed and a mild compression wrap was applied to the area for 4-6 weeks postoperatively. Patient demographics were obtained preoperatively, while physical exam findings and postoperative outcomes related to the fascia lata harvest were collected at sequential follow up visits. RESULTS: One-hundred eight patients underwent 111 large fascia lata harvests for either transvaginal or abdominal/robotic POP repair from July 2016 to January 2022. Mean follow-up was 19.6 months (range: 1-65) with 38 patients having 24 months or more of follow-up. Mean Visual Analog Pain (VAP) score was 1 (range: 0-10). Sixteen patients developed asymptomatic thigh bulges, 16 patients developed harvest site seromas (of which 14 resolved), and 59 patients experienced mild, non-bothersome paresthesia near the incision. CONCLUSION: Large fascia lata harvest offers a robust autograft for transvaginal or transabdominal POP repair with minimal morbidity. Harvest site complications are minor and typically resolve with expectant management. This technique can be safely utilized in patients who desire graft-augmented repair of POP without the use of synthetic mesh, allograft, or xenograft.

Cosmetic and functional impact of fascia lata harvest for use in surgery for stress urinary incontinence.

INTRODUCTION: There has been increased interest in using autologous tissues since the Food and Drug Administration banned transvaginal mesh for pelvic organ prolapse in 2019. Our study aims to assess patients' perspective of functional and cosmetic impact on the fascia lata harvest site in patients undergoing fascia lata harvest for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: This is a prospective survey study of a retrospective cohort of patients who underwent a fascia lata pubovaginal sling between 2017 and 2022. Participants completed a survey regarding the functional and cosmetic outcomes of the harvest site. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-nine patients completed the survey for a completion rate of 40.3%. For functional symptoms, 24.1% (7/29) of patients reported leg discomfort, 10.3% (3/29) reported leg weakness, 10.3% (3/29) reported a bulge, 17.2% (5/29) reported scar pain, 14.8% (4/27) reported scar numbness, and 17.2% (5/29) reported paresthesia at the scar. For cosmetic outcomes, 72.4% (21/29) reported an excellent or good scar appearance. On the PGI-I, 75.9% (22/29) reported their condition as very much better (48.3%, 14/29) or much better (27.6%, 8/29). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients reported being satisfied with the functional and cosmetic outcomes of their harvest site as well as satisfied with the improvement in their SUI. Less than 25% of patients report harvest site symptoms, including leg weakness, scar bulging, scar pain, scar numbness, or paresthesia in the scar. This is important in the context of appropriate preoperative discussion and counseling regarding fascia lata harvest.

In vivo study to assess fat embolism resulting from the Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator 2 system compared to a novel aspirator-based concept for intramedullary bone graft harvesting.

INTRODUCTION: Fat embolism (FE) following intramedullary (IM) reaming can cause severe pulmonary complications and sudden death. Recently, a new harvesting concept was introduced in which a novel aspirator is used first for bone marrow (BM) aspiration and then for subsequent aspiration of morselized endosteal bone during sequential reaming (A + R + A). In contrast to the established Reamer-Irrigator-Aspirator (RIA) 2 system, the new A + R + A concept allows for the evacuation of fatty BM prior to reaming. In this study, we hypothesized that the risk of FE, associated coagulopathic reactions and pulmonary FE would be comparable between the RIA 2 system and the A + R + A concept. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intramedullary bone graft was harvested from intact femora of 16 Merino sheep (age: 1-2 years) with either the RIA 2 system (n = 8) or the A + R + A concept (n = 8). Fat intravasation was monitored with the Gurd test, coagulopathic response with D-dimer blood level concentration and pulmonary FE with histological evaluation of the lungs. RESULTS: The total number and average size of intravasated fat particles was similar between groups (p = 0.13 and p = 0.98, respectively). D-dimer concentration did not significantly increase within 4 h after completion of surgery (RIA 2: p = 0.82; A + R + A: p = 0.23), with an interaction effect similar between groups (p = 0.65). The average lung area covered with fat globules was similar between groups (p = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the RIA 2 system and the novel A + R + A harvesting concept which consists of BM evacuation followed by sequential IM reaming and aspiration of endosteal bone, resulted in only minor fat intravasation, coagulopathic reactions and pulmonary FE, with no significant differences between the groups. Our results, therefore, suggest that both the RIA 2 system and the new A + R + A concept are comparable technologies in terms of FE-related complications.

Morbidity Associated With Distal Tibial Autograft Harvest.

Distal tibial autograft harvesting has been studied in the past, but morbidity at the level of the donor site is unclear. The purpose of this retrospective review is to assess morbidity in distal tibial autograft harvesting associated with foot and ankle arthrodesis procedures. A retrospective analysis was performed utilizing patients treated in the last 13 years at a large, multicenter, academic, tertiary referral, research institution. Included patients were between the ages of 18 and 80 years old. One-hundred and seven patients (39 male; 68 female) underwent ipsilateral distal tibial bone graft (n = 110) harvesting to augment the index procedure. Patients were followed for an average of 11.2 months after surgery (Range: 1-73 months). The incidence rate of distal tibial stress fractures was 4.5%, with an overall postoperative complication rate of 8.2%. Overall, low complication rates associated with distal tibial autograft harvesting were found, supporting the use of the distal tibia as an appropriate site for autograft harvesting in foot and ankle surgery.

Laparo-Endoscopic Single-Site Left Donor Nephrectomy In Patients With Uncommon Renal Vascular Anatomy: Does the Technique Make a Difference?

BACKGROUND: To compare donor and recipient outcomes in patients with renal artery and ante-aortic renal vein vs unusual renal vascular anatomy undergoing laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESSDN). METHODS: A retrospective chart review of the comparative study of donor and recipient outcomes of LESSDN in donors with venous abnormality (n = 28, group A), arterial abnormality (n = 74, group B), and standard donors (n = 248, group C). RESULTS: From September 2016 to August 2022, 350 left LESSDN were performed. The most common anomalies in group A were the retro-aortic and 2 renal veins in 12 patients each. In group B, 72 and 2 patients had 2 and 3 renal arteries, respectively. Operative and warm ischemia times were significantly longer in donors with vascular anomalies. Moreover, patient creatinine on discharge was significantly higher in arterial anomalies; it was 1.61 ± 0.22 compared with 1.26 ± 0.43 and 1.25 ± 0.32 mg/dL for patients with no anomalies and venous anomalies, respectively (P < .001). However, serum creatinine levels recovered after 1 month and were comparable between the study groups. Recipients, operative time, and vascular anastomosis time were significantly longer in recipients with vascular anomaly. Slow graft function was higher in group B (6.9%) than in the other groups. One-year graft survival rates were 96.4%, 94.6%, and 97.1% (P = .496). CONCLUSION: With increased experience, LESSDN in multiple renal arteries and uncommon venous anatomy cases is feasible and safe. Moreover, it does not influence donor or recipient outcomes.

Lymphedema after saphenous harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery: case report and literature review.

Different causes have been described for secondary lymphedema as reported in this article. A 75-year-old man was diagnosed with lymphedema about one decade after saphenous harvesting for coronary artery bypass surgery. It took two years for him to find out his diagnosis and receive the proper treatment. After standard complete decongestive therapy, his volume and pain decreased and his quality of life was improved, especially its physical aspect. It is important to recognize the possibility of lymphedema development after saphenous harvesting among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery to prevent significant disturbance of quality of life with timely management.

Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy: Experience of 556 cases at Seoul National University Hospital.

Pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy (PLDH) has become a routine procedure at Seoul National University Hospital, and the pure laparoscopic method is now being applied to liver recipients as well. This study aimed to review the procedure and outcomes of PLDH to identify any areas that required improvement. Data from 556 donors who underwent PLDH between November 2015 and December 2021 and their recipients were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, 541 patients underwent pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy (PLDRH). The mean hospital stay of the donor was 7.2 days, and the rate of grade I, II, IIIa, and IIIb complications was 2.2%, 2.7%, 1.3%, and 0.9%, respectively, without any irreversible disabilities or mortalities. The most common early and late major complications in the recipient were intraabdominal bleeding (n = 47, 8.5%) and biliary problems (n = 198, 35.6%), respectively. Analysis of the PLDRH procedure showed that operative time, liver removal time, warm ischemic time, Δhemoglobin%, Δtotal bilirubin%, and postoperative hospital stay decreased significantly as the number of cases accumulated. In conclusion, the operative outcomes of PLDRH improved as the number of cases increased. However, continuous caution is needed because major complications still occur in donors and recipients even after hundreds of cases.

Paradigm Shift from Linear Strip to Follicular Unit Excision in Hair Restoration Surgery.

Follicular unit excision (FUE) is a very effective and valuable modality for obtaining donor hair follicles using manual, motorized, or robotic devices to harvest individual donor follicular units in situ without a linear donor scar or visible scarring making it ideal for patients who wish to wear their hair short and hide signs of surgery. Over the past two decades, FUE has become increasingly popular, and the rising demand for FUE has driven the worldwide market size of hair restoration surgery (HRS) to an unprecedented height.FUE has revolutionized the HRS industry and offers excellent cosmesis and high patient satisfaction. Unfortunately, a large part of the favorable appeal of FUE is due to false claims that it is "minimally invasive," "scarless," or "not even surgery." Most patients opt-in for FUE due to these misconceptions, which are advertised by "black-market" clinics offering low-cost FUE surgery performed by amateur, nonprofessional technicians on unsuspected patients. The technique appears deceptively simple, and many neophyte surgeons falsely believe that the learning curve of FUE is short because the barrier of entry is low and no previous surgical skill is required. Nevertheless, injuries on grafts are extremely easy to occur since FUE is a blind technique and can be minimized only with excellent technique, which takes years to master.FUE actually presents unique challenges for the surgeon and carries potential long-term permanent side effects if not performed properly. The surgeon must have a thorough understanding of the nuances of the FUE surgical technique to ensure consistent graft quality and favorable cosmesis of both donor and recipient areas. Efficient FUE requires dexterity, training, dedication, devotion, enthusiasm, cognitive clarity, scientific knowledge, experience, and an extended learning curve.FUE is an invaluable addition to the armamentarium of a hair restoration surgeon but has to be judiciously performed.

Complications with Follicular Unit Excision.

Hair restoration surgery (HRS) is typically a safe outpatient or office-based procedure when physicians follow high ethical standards and uphold community practice standards. Patients' clinical outcomes are mostly operator dependent, and temporary and permanent complications rarely occur. Follicular unit excision (FUE) donor harvesting, in particular, is a challenging harvesting technique requiring a long learning curve, physical stamina, higher than average hand-eye coordination and manual dexterity. The types of complications associated with FUE are comparable to linear strip excision (LSE). Similar to LSE donor harvesting, FUE complications may occur irrespective if standard precautions are followed by the physician. As in any skin and scalp procedure, injuries and poor cosmetic outcomes occur despite appropriate preoperative precautions and intraoperative technique. In increasing and greater instances, however, FUE complications are observed when the physician fails to follow hair restoration practice standards and routine surgical precautions. Physician induced, or iatrogenic complications occur more often when untrained licensed surgeons perform HRS, and who fail to meet practice standards and best practices. In the last decade, physician-influenced FUE complications, or iatrogenic cause of FUE injuries are increasingly observed which results in poor aesthetic outcomes. Higher than average FUE complication rates occur in cases involving inadequately trained physicians, as well as in cases where improper delegation of the FUE hair transplant procedure is performed by unlicensed and untrained individuals. In this chapter, we described commonly encountered HRS complications, as well as physician influenced, or iatrogenic causes of FUE complications.

Endoscopic Pedicle Saphenous Vein Graft Harvesting.

The excellent long-term patency of no-touch (NT) saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) makes the grafts very attractive for coronary artery bypass grafting; however, NT-SVG harvesting has a greater incidence of wound complications than conventional methods. Since 2009, we have performed endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) in our department with very few major wound complications. Because NT-SVG harvesting is expected to provide long-term patency, if performed with EVH, the incidence of wound complications will be reduced. Thus, we began performing endoscopic pedicle SVG harvesting (Pedicle-EVH) in March 2019. Herein, we report the early results obtained using our current Pedicle-EVH procedure. No major wound complications were reported, and the early results, including patency, were satisfactory. To harvest the pedicle SVG, however, we used a different method than the NT-SVG procedure, so careful monitoring will be needed to assess long-term outcomes.

Reduction of the scar burden at the donor area of the radial forearm flap with the aid of an endoscopic pedicle preparation.

BACKGROUND: The radial forearm flap is one of the most commonly used flaps of reconstructive microsurgery with its long pedicle and thin structure. The donor site at the forearm is a visible anatomic region that has high mobility and functional importance. In this study, a longitudinal and large scar was avoided on the forearm during pedicle dissection of the conventional radial forearm flap with the utilization of an endoscope. Furthermore, arterial, venous, and nervous injuries were avoided by performing a separate inci-sion of 2-3 cm at the cubital fossa to reduce flap failure and donor site morbidity. METHODS: The patients who underwent pedicle dissection of the radial forearm flap with the aid of an endoscope for head-neck reconstruction between 2014 and 2021 were included in this study. The flap was harvested from the subfascial plane. The cephalic vein was used in all of the patients. When the pedicle dissection reached the antecubital region, an incision of 2-3 cm was performed from the skin. Two vein anastomoses were performed for each patient. RESULTS: This retrospective study consists of 51 patients. While 45 of the patients were the result of head and neck cancer, six of them had a defect caused by trauma. The average area of skin islands was 40.3 cm2, while the full-thickness skin graft size was 24.2 cm2. An average of 2.6 cm of scar tissue was formed at the antecubital region. No venous or arterial compromise was observed in the post-operative period. There was no partial or total flap loss in any patient. Localized numbness persisted in the skin area where the superficial sensory branch of the radial nerve is located in 6 (11.7%) patients. CONCLUSION: With endoscopic radial forearm flap harvesting, the longitudinal incision in the forearm and wound healing prob-lems are avoided. The absence of partial or total flap loss has shown that endoscopic harvesting of the radial forearm flap is a safe and reliable method.

Vein Morphology in Endoscopic Vein Harvesting: 15-Year Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Long-term outcomes of vein morphologies in the endoscopic vein harvesting setting are lacking. We analyzed 15-year follow-up for endoscopic versus open vein harvesting and associated vein morphology outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting at a single center. METHODS: This single-center, prospectively collected, retrospective, observational study evaluated 15-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) of endoscopic versus open vein harvesting and associated vein morphologies. RESULTS: Among 729 patients, no differences were found between endoscopic and open vein harvesting in MACE hazard ratios despite increased risks with native Hawai'ian, Pacific Islander, and Filipino patients. Asian and Filipino patients had more thin-walled veins and Asian and multirace patients had more vasovasoral branches than White patients. Bifid veins were associated with increased risk of cardiac catheterization. Varicose veins were associated with myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and death. Thick-walled veins were associated with revascularization and dense adhesions with cardiac catheterization and revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Fifteen-year adjusted MACE was similar between endoscopic and open vein harvesting in small coronary targets despite increased risks with native Hawai'ian, Pacific Islander, and Filipino patients. Bifid, varicose, thick-walled veins, and dense adhesions had worse MACE.

[First experience of 3D-laparoscopy in donor nephrectomy]. / Nachal'nyi opyt ispol'zovaniya 3D-videosistem pri laparoskopicheskoi donorskoi nefrektomii.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the first experience of 3D imaging for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 28 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies and 28 subsequent transplantations to related recipients. Of these, 14 laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were performed using 3D camera. The main intraoperative parameters and information about postoperative period in donors and recipients were compared with similar data on previous laparoscopic donor nephrectomies and kidney transplantations with traditional 2D imaging. There were 15 left-sided and 13 right-sided nephrectomies. Twenty and eight laparoscopic nephrectomies were performed via retroperitoneal and transperitoneal access, respectively. There were no significant between-group differences in age, sex ratio, BMI, side of surgery and number of renal arteries. RESULTS: Surgery time (119.28±9.18 and 124.85±7.49 min, respectively) and blood loss (106.78±16.12 and 119.28±19.79 ml, respectively) were similar. Laparoscopic nephrectomy with 3D imaging was followed by significantly shorter primary warm ischemia (2.41±0.79 and 3.23±0.57 min, respectively, p=0.004) and time of extracorporeal preparation of the transplant (back table) under cold preservation (27.21±5.42 and 32.36±5.33 min, respectively, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Initial experience of video systems with 3D imaging in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy has not yet led to significant reduction of surgery time and improvement of transplant function compared to traditional 2D imaging. At the same time, there was a shorter period of primary warm ischemia and back table time. Further analysis is needed to assess possible benefits of 3D imaging in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.

Donor Safety and Risk Factors of Pure Laparoscopic Living Donor Right Hepatectomy: A Korean Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify safety and risk factors of living donor after pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy in a Korean multicenter cohort study. BACKGROUND: Pure laparoscopic donor right hepatectomy is not yet a standardized surgical procedure due to lack of data. METHODS: This retrospective study included 543 patients undergoing PLRDH between 2010 and 2018 in 5 Korean transplantation centers. Complication rates were assessed and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors of open conversion, overall complications, major complications, and biliary complications. RESULTS: Regarding open conversion, the incidence was 1.7% and the risk factor was body mass index >30 kg/m 2 [ P =0.001, odds ratio (OR)=22.72, 95% CI=3.56-146.39]. Rates of overall, major (Clavien-Dindo classification III-IV), and biliary complications were 9.2%, 4.4%, and 3.5%, respectively. For overall complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.007, OR=2.66, 95% CI=1.31-5.41), estimated blood loss ( P <0.001, OR=4.84, 95% CI=2.50-9.38), and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.01, OR=2.46, 95% CI=1.25-4.88). For major complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.002, OR=4.01, 95% CI=1.67-9.62) and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.003, OR=3.84, 95% CI=1.60-9.21). For biliary complications, risk factors were graft weight >700 g ( P =0.01, OR=4.34, 95% CI=1.40-13.45) and operation time >400 minutes ( P =0.01, OR=4.16, 95% CI=1.34-12.88). CONCLUSION: Careful donor selection for PLRDH considering body mass index, graft weight, estimated blood loss, and operation time combined with skilled procedure can improve donor safety.

How the websites of high-volume US centers address the risks of living kidney donation.

BACKGROUND: The websites of US transplant centers may be a source of information about the renal risks of potential living kidney donors. METHODS: To include only likely best practices, we surveyed websites of centers that performed at least 50 living donor kidney transplants per year. We tabulated how risks were conveyed regarding loss of eGFR at donation, the adequacy of long-term ESRD risk data, long-term donor mortality, minority donor ESRD risk, concerns about hyperfiltration injury versus the risk of end-stage kidney diseases, comparisons of ESRD risks in donors to population risks, the increased risks of younger donors, an effect of the donation itself to increase risk, quantifying risks over specific intervals, and a lengthening list of small post-donation medical risks and metabolic changes of uncertain significance. RESULTS: While websites had no formal obligation to address donor risks, many offered abundant information. Some conveyed OPTN-mandated requirements for counseling individual donor candidates. While actual wording often varied, there was general agreement on many issues. We occasionally noted clear-cut differences among websites in risk characterization and other outliers. CONCLUSIONS: The websites of the most active US centers offer insights into how transplant professionals view living kidney donor risk. Website content may merit further study.