Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking among University Students in Three Eastern Mediterranean Countries: Patterns, Place, and Price.

Background: The objective of this study was to examine waterpipe tobacco smoking patterns, places of smoking, and prices paid among university students in the Eastern Mediterranean Region. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was administered to a convenience sample of university students in three countries. Participants were young adults (18-29 years) who were ever waterpipe smokers, from Egypt (n = 728), Jordan (n = 790), and Palestine (n = 722). Measures included past-30-day waterpipe smoking, frequency, intensity, place of smoking, and prices paid per waterpipe smoking session and for packaged waterpipe tobacco. Logistic regression models evaluated the factors associated with past-30-day waterpipe smoking. Results: Past-30-day waterpipe smoking (prevalence) was observed among 60.7%, 67.7% and 63.1% of students from Egypt, Jordan, and Palestine, respectively. Among past-30-day smokers, past-5-day waterpipe smoking (frequency) was observed among 28.9%, 51.5%, and 48.6% of participants, respectively. Smoking in a café was highest among participants from Egypt (74.0%), followed by those from Palestine (44.8%), and Jordan (43.0%). Mean price paid per session was USD 0.99 (Egypt), USD 8.07 (Jordan), USD 6.05 (Palestine). The corresponding mean prices per packet were USD 0.86, USD 4.96, and USD 5.55, respectively. Predictors of past-30-day waterpipe smoking included younger age of initiation, male gender, employment, and smoking waterpipe alone. Conclusions: This study contributes to our understanding of waterpipe smoking patterns, places of smoking, and prices paid among young adults in a region with alarmingly high smoking rates. Understanding waterpipe smoking behaviors can inform the design of policy and educational interventions to curb its rising threat.

Interventions for waterpipe tobacco smoking prevention and cessation: a systematic review.

Waterpipe tobacco smoking is growing in popularity despite adverse health effects among users. We systematically reviewed the literature, searching MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science, for interventions targeting prevention and cessation of waterpipe tobacco smoking. We assessed the evidence quality using the Cochrane (randomised studies), GRADE (non-randomised studies) and CASP (qualitative studies) frameworks. Data were synthesised narratively due to heterogeneity. We included four individual-level, five group-level, and six legislative interventions. Of five randomised controlled studies, two showed significantly higher quit rates in intervention groups (bupropion/behavioural support versus placebo in Pakistan; 6 month abstinence relative risk (RR): 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.8); group behavioural support versus no intervention in Egypt, 12 month abstinence RR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-8.9). Non-randomised studies showed mixed results for cessation, behavioural, and knowledge outcomes. One high quality modelling study from Lebanon calculated that a 10% increase in waterpipe tobacco taxation would reduce waterpipe tobacco demand by 14.5% (price elasticity of demand -1.45). In conclusion, there is a lack of evidence of effectiveness for most waterpipe interventions. While few show promising results, higher quality interventions are needed. Meanwhile, tobacco policies should place waterpipe on par with cigarettes.